The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Orphan article. Over 50 references, but how many of those actually constitute significant coverage in reliable sources? I'm not sure I've seen enough here to be convinced this passes WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 15:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable actress with no significant coverage in reliable sources. The only significant coverage cited in the article are interviews, which lack independence; the rest of the articles cited are trivial mentions. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV. External links are not WP:INDEPENDENT, either. Maybe someone who has a grasp on Mandarin Chinese can speak upon this. TLA (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
This is the same article as the one found by 94rain ( talk · contribs) but is a non-paywalled copy of the article from the source that originally published it. The article notes: "纵观其履历,罗熹在农行任职时间最久,达22年,在工行工作4年,在中国出口信用保险公司工作3年,在华润集团工作将近3年,执掌太平集团2年时间。在任职太平集团一把手期间,罗熹还任太平保险集团(香港)公司、太平保险控股董事长,并兼任太平人寿、太平资产等多个太平子公司董事长。"
From Google Translate: "Looking at his resume, Luo Xi has worked at the Agricultural Bank of China for the longest time, reaching 22 years. He has worked at ICBC for 4 years, at China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation for 3 years, at China Resources Group for nearly 3 years, and at the helm of Taiping Group for 2 years. While serving as the top leader of Taiping Group, Luo Xi also served as the chairman of Taiping Insurance Group (Hong Kong) Company and Taiping Insurance Holdings, and concurrently served as the chairman of several Taiping subsidiaries such as Taiping Life Insurance and Taiping Assets."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 17:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 23:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Hazaras. Fails WP:NBOOKS. As part of WP:BEFORE, checked sourcing on interlanguage links as well but failed to turn up sources or coverage that would meet notability. Longhornsg ( talk) 06:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
From this 1 December 2016 obituary Internet Archive for Mary Ann Siegfried, the editor of the Afghanistan Forum: ""After two years, she returned home to Ohio via freighter and soon set out for New York City, where she landed a job with the Asia Society. The nonprofit’s mission was to introduce Americans to Asia, “since most people didn’t even know where it was,” she told The Star. Through editing the society’s newsletter on Afghanistan, The Afghanistan Forum, for more than 25 years, she became an expert on that country.""
The book review notes: "Poladi was not a polished scholar and the book has certain weaknesses. He has assembled and attempted to use virtually everything he could find on his subject; hence, the inclusion of some unnecessary material. The comments of poorly informed travelers are treated with the same respect as the measured reports of thorough scholars. Nevertheless, after extensive summaries of such diverse works he usually comes to defensible conclusions of his own, and, despite his evident apologetic purpose, he presents a reasonable and plausible image of the Hazara experience. Indeed, weaknesses aside, this book is a rich mine of information on the Hazaras, for Poladi's inclusion of everything that is known about them makes it an incomparable source on the subject. The book is a kind of final utterance of Hassan Poladi, "a project of the heart," as someone close to him put it, for he passed away in the same year his book was published."
The review notes: "This book is remarkable in a number of regards. Most importantly, being a Hazara from Pakistan, enjoying access to Hazara American informants, and having received his tertiary education in his adopted country America, Poladi is in the unique position to relate the subject matter both as an insider and as a Western-trained scholar. He deserves much credit for his sincere and mostly successful endeavor to depict the Hazara’s world in an unbiased fashion, despite his admitted difficulties in detaching himself emotionally at all times, particularly while dealing with his people’s suffering through slavery and war. The exclusive use of the author's own technical and financial resources — aside from other persons' occasional help (e.g. typing, editing, translating, and library access) — makes The Hazäras the rather impressive result of a virtually single-handed effort."
The review further notes: "The Härzaras has more than its fair share of grammatical and orthographic errors, inconsistencies and inadequacies. Inclusion of page headers would have facilitated quick reference. Captions in the body of the text ought to have been consistent with those in the List of Illustrations. The sporadic appearance of unexplained abbreviations in the bibliography ought to have been avoided. The subject index ought to have been extended to include all section headings. However, none of this lessens the value of Poladi's work to any significant degree. Being an important addition to the hitherto all too meager store of publications about this interesting nation, The Hazäras definitely deserves the attention of those interested in any Central-Asia-related aspect of Afghan studies."
The short review notes: "The Häzaras, by Hassan Poladi. Stockton, CA: Mughal Publishing, 1989. xvi + 431 pages. Append. Bibl. Index. $19.95. A detailed study of the Hazara people of Afghanistan. Examines social customs, religion, history, language, and economy. Also includes a chronology and commentaries on rulers from 1370. (JDM)"
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss sources Cunard identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 23:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:NPROF, unless the professional memberships are prestigious enough to carry the page on their own. I cleaned this article up a bit and removed non-RSes and sources that don't mention the subject. Some of the refs are still social media or screenshots of certificates or webpages though. BuySomeApples ( talk) 23:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::But he is considered to be a notable person as an academic isn't he? Maybe he is notable just not as an academic.
BulgarianCat (
talk) 10:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I suggest taking a look at the history of this page. I put a bunch of effort into trying to clear this up, but the amount of peacock editing and bullshit is just irreparable. Claiming to have founded things she's not credited for, lots of self-published sources, lots of awards by organisations she's connected to.
I've already removed the more offensive examples, but I actually think this article is unsaveably promotional and when you take it all away, I don't think there's anything left. For what it's worth, it's noted on the user page of the user who wrote the article that Hall asked them to write the article in the first place.
I've spent the last 30 minutes looking through mounds of shit for sigcov and I'm not seeing it. If anyone thinks there's something there, be my guest. BrigadierG ( talk) 23:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Restored from a long-ago PROD per request of the subject, but unsourced for the decade before that. BD2412 T 23:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
An Islamic Shia scholar and former representative of Shia marja' Abu-al-Qasim al-Khoei in the United States until 1982, article only lists two sources one of which is an Amazon link to one of his book, fails WP:GNG. Last two works mentioned in the article do not appear to be written by him, and all except for first ones are translations of other works. Lolekek ( talk) 23:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails to pass General notability guidelines Death Editor 2 ( talk) 22:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This does not preclude a rename or speedy renomination at a time when input might be forthcoming. Star Mississippi 03:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The tournament is a youth (Asian Asian Group) tournament, rather than the main continental swimming championship. The previous tournament for the main tournament was in 2016 Tokyo (10th) while the previous edition for the actual tournament in Bangalore, India (10th Asian Age Group). There's a lack of resources to create an article for theAsian Age Group Championships that would satisfy WP:GNG either. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 11:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Is there a procedure to at least move this page to it's accurate title "2024 Asian Group Championships" while still under AfD, the page has been under a inaccurate title for too long. I have to emphasize that this is a different tournament than the senior Asian Championship yet again. In restrospect, I should have moved this first before nominating for deletion. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 03:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable coach/player with only affiliated sources and social media posts used to establish article. After a search I cannot find any non-affiliated sources regarding the subject.
Additionally, it appears the article may have been created by the own individual. Grahaml35 ( talk) 19:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking for more feedback on newly presented sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Minor private equity firm without any sigcov that I can find. BrigadierG ( talk) 22:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While a majority of editors have !voted for keep, editors in favor of deletion continue to maintain that strict organizational notability guidelines have not been met. The difference in evaluation comes down to differing assessments over the degree of independence of various examples of coverage cited in this discussion, as well as assessments as to whether coverage is of the organization, of its reports, or of its founders. A few keep !votes also made IAR arguments to the effect that this organization's reports' prominence in coverage relating to Israel-Palestine is sufficient to establish notability despite the fact that this coverage is generally not of significant depth regarding the organization. signed, Rosguill talk 15:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP; no coverage which is independent, reliable, and significant,
While there is a small amount of independent coverage of some of the initiatives it has launched and the reports it has published, this is not sufficient to establish notability per both
WP:INHERITORG and
WP:NCORP#Significant coverage of the company itself; Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.
Note that this article was previously deleted under a different name at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor; it was then recreated by a Euro-Med HRM employee under a number of names ( The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, etc) before finally "sticking" under the current name. The current article has also been edited by at least nine different Euro-Med HRM employees, mostly WP:UPEs.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181211-euro-med-hrm-saudi-arabia-has-forcibly-disappeared-3-libyans/ | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.marsad.ly/en/2021/05/19/euro-med-hrm-calls-for-disclosure-of-maps-for-mine-sites-in-libya/ | ? | Significant coverage of a "call" from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.euromedmonitor.org/en/About | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122281718 | ? Unclear where these profiles come from; whether they are from the organization | One sentence of coverage of their aims, and a list of its structure | ✘ No | |
https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-palestine | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/report-special-rapporteur-situation-human-rights-palestinian-8 | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/israels-icc-rebuttal-admission-war-crimes-rights-group | Significant coverage of a statement from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://mondoweiss.net/2018/07/family-visits-imprisoned/ | Republication of a republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ~ | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/2890/Euro-Med-announces-changes-in-its-administrative-and-executive-structure | About-self | ? | ? | ✘ No |
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-targets-rights-defenders-un-council-hears/1992437 | WP:RSP for Anadolu Agency (controversial topics, international politics) | Significant coverage of a statement from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/author/ramy-abdu/ | ? | ? | Focused on Ramy Abdu; no significant coverage of Ramy Abdu or Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/ramy-abdu/ | ? | ? | Focused on Ramy Abdu; no significant coverage of Ramy Abdu or Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2019/08/27/as-mena-states-grow-increasingly-repressive-businesses-should-lead-reform/ | Published by Ramy Abdu | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/staff | About-self | ? | ? | ✘ No |
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/101164 | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://imemc.org/article/euro-med-monitor-report-suffocation-and-isolation-15-years-of-israeli-blockade-on-gaza/ | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://web.archive.org/web/20200407104742/https://www.soc.ucsb.edu/faculty/lisa-hajjar | Faculty page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://poli.ucalgary.ca/profiles/tareq-ismael | Faculty page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/michael-smith-uae-prison-mps-b1813663.html | Significant coverage of a letter organized by the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://exeter.academia.edu/TanyaNewburySmith | academia.edu page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/authors/3/Maha-Hussaini | About-self | ? | Maybe SIGCOV of Maha Hussaini, not sigcov of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/maha-hussaini/ | Author page for a Euro-Med HRM reporter | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/maha-hussaini-martin-adler-prize-win-rory-peck-trust | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.una-oic.org/page/public/news_details.aspx?id=328294&NL=True | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of an official complaint from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/ngo914.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Libya | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2021/ngo923.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2021/ngo927.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ngo942.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo950.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo953.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo959.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ngo933.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://kvinnatillkvinna.org/about-us/where-we-work/mena/palestine/ | Funded (?) a Euro-Med HRM Project | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/08/palestine-gaza-civil-society-women-leadership-incubator.html | ? | Significant coverage of Women's Leadership Incubator project, passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.launchgood.com/campaign/from_denial_to_defense_youth_for_rights#!/ | A "go fund me" equivilent for a Euro-Med HRM project | Significant coverage of the project, not of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
http://www.ju.edu.jo/Lists/NewsLetter/Disp_f.aspx?ID=1175&Issue=August%202016&order=8 | UJ Newsletter about a summer school hosted at UJ | ? | Passing mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://thepoliticain.co.uk/middle-east/201/ | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a summer school set up by Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.bnreport.com/en/wikirights-2/ | ? | Significant coverage of a program by Euro-Med HRM to edit Wikipedia, no significant coverage of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://law.ju.edu.jo/Lists/AcademicNews/Test.aspx?ID=78&ContentTypeId=0x0100FB3DD40023178C409CDBAC99DB39D980 | Copy of source 36, this time hosted on UJ's sharepoint | ? | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20211003105920/https://europebriefnews.com/2017/10/25/watering-the-seeds/ | Not discussed at RSN, but I'm convinced that it is not a reliable source. The source is obscure and now defunct, and its "about me" page only said "Europe Brief News (EBN) provides our readers with latest news from across Europe such as news, stories, politics, tourism, travel, food, health diet and many more topics" which does not indicate any level of editorial control or reliability. The specific article also raises questions; it is labeled as "news", but it is reads as an opinion piece. Note that there is a current organization using the name Europe Brief News that does appear reliable, but they are not the same entity - the current one was founded in 2020. |
? It could arguably contain WP:SIGCOV, but I'm not convinced; it uses a lot of words but says very little about Euro-Med HRM, and WP:NCORP requires that the coverage is sufficient to "makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization". However, this is a lesser issue than the reliability of the source. | ✘ No | |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/3190 | About-self | ? | Significant coverage of a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/11/career-assassination-dws-scapegoating-of-arab-employees | Passing mention of a press release from Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.nonviolenceinternational.net/many_faces_wann | Appears written by We Are Not Numbers | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.middleeasteye.net/features/deported-israels-war-against-palestine-solidarity-activists | Written by the secretary of Euro-Med HRM | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/128695 | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
We Are Not Numbers: Junge Stimmen aus Gaza | A book written by We Are Not Numbers | ? | ? | ✘ No |
http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/struggles-triumphs-palestinian/ | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20160824141709/http://www.daysofpalestine.com/news/israel-bans-right-activist-entering-gaza/ | ? | Single sentence of coverage of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.972mag.com/gaza-fence-stories-hebrew/ | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/5/german-court-rules-palestinian-ex-dw-journalist-sacking-unlawful | Passing mention of a Euro-Med HRM investigation | ✘ No | ||
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/5039/Euro-Med-Monitor%27s-We-Are-Not-Numbers-project-celebrates-graduation-of-new-batch-of-writers | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/5562/Euro-Med-Monitor%E2%80%99s-project-We-Are-Not-Numbers-launches-17th-cohort-of-writers | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://news.trust.org/item/20210902130009-tk186/ | ? | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM; syndicated from a Reuters article which is used seperately as a reference | ✘ No | |
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/they-told-us-they-hate-africans-hundreds-detained-deported-abu-dhabi-2021-09-02/ | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/tori-58446660 | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM. Appears to be identical to the two reuters and truth.org sources linked above, except translated into Pidgin | ✘ No | ||
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1437749/saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuse-minister-disappeared | ~ Most of the coverage related to Euro-Med HRM consists of quotes | WP:DAILYEXPRESS | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/risks-refugees-disabilities-face-turkey-how-mitigate-risks-and-challenges-shape-apt | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://europebriefnews.com/2017/12/09/euro-med-monitor/ | ? See earlier discussion of Europe Brief New's reliability | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/world/middleeast/fleeing-gaza-only-to-face-treachery-and-disaster-at-sea-.html | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1437749/saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuse-minister-disappeared | WP:DAILYEXPRESS | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jordan-arrests-hundreds-of-teachers-after-violent-clashes-zzg7ppsvh | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gaza-war-survivor-commemorates-victims-paintings-2022-05-26/ | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://palestine.unwomen.org/en/stories/feature-story/2022/05/zainab-al-qolaq-a-survivor-of-an-israeli-airstrike-on-gaza-in-may-2021-tells-her-story | ? | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.As an aside, while Common Dreams is not at RSP, discussions at RSN lean towards it being unreliable.
The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, a Geneva-based Human Rights NGO, reported that the law legitimized censorship and restricted freedom of expression (Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 2020).Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization.
PA Security also commonly targets opposition. The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor documented 1,274 arbitrary detentions in the West Bank in 2015 and 1,089 summonses by Palestinian Security Services. The human rights violations targeted mostly individuals affiliated with Hamas or who opposed PA policies, including about 35 journalists and human rights activists, 476 university students, and 67 teachers/professors (Euro-Med 2016).Again, not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. BilledMammal ( talk) 14:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Advocate for the human rights of all persons across Europe and the MENA region, particularly those who live under occupation, in the throes of war or political unrest and/or have been displaced due to persecution or armed conflict.Further, they normally provide
a profile in the words of the organization itself. The coverage is neither significant nor independent.
describ[ing] only a specific topic related to an organization. A report is not a "topic." Brusquedandelion ( talk) 02:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.BilledMammal ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Updated BilledMammal ( talk) 18:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor does not publish any financial date on its website, reflecting a complete lack of transparency and accountabilityand
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor (Euro-Med Monitor) consistently spreads blood libels and conspiracy theories about Israel, and accuses Israel of “apartheid,” genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” “collective punishment,” and “war crimes.”The rest is limited to quotes from Euro-Med and affiliated individuals and thus doesn't contribute to WP:SIGCOV as the quotes aren't independent coverage.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
ample references to it | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? Unknown |
this paper published in the Lancet | Authors include the founder and chairman of Euro-Med HRM | Coverage is limited to detailing Euro-Med HRM's activities in preparing the report: "The field researchers of Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor covered 338 (64%) of the total 530 children killed. They focused extensively on mass attacks because it was difficult to cover hundreds of attacks taking place at the same time for 50 days." No WP:SIGCOV of the Euro-Med HRM itself. | ✘ No | |
UNRWA published press releases 1 | Republished press release from Euro-Med HRM | ? | Coverage of a primary report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
UNRWA published press releases 2 | Republished press release from Euro-Med HRM | ? | Coverage of a statement from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
Their reports are routinely picked up by RS | Coverage of a call from Euro-Med HRM to free a Tunisian prisoner; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
) Watchdog Submits Evidence of Israeli Executions of Gaza Civilians to UN, ICC in Common Dreams | ~ While Common Dreams is not at RSP, discussions at RSN lean towards it being unreliable | Coverage of a report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
Rights at Stake and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Special Issues of the Journal of Human Rights Scholarly Citation. | Coverage is "The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, a Geneva-based Human Rights NGO, reported that the law legitimized censorship and restricted freedom of expression (Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 2020)." Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. | ✘ No | ||
National and International Civilian Protection Strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Schoarly Citation. | Coverage is "PA Security also commonly targets opposition. The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor documented 1,274 arbitrary detentions in the West Bank in 2015 and 1,089 summonses by Palestinian Security Services. The human rights violations targeted mostly individuals affiliated with Hamas or who opposed PA policies, including about 35 journalists and human rights activists, 476 university students, and 67 teachers/professors (Euro-Med 2016)." Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. | ✘ No | ||
Israel 'stealing organs' from bodies in Gaza, alleges human rights group | Coverage of an allegation from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
Allegations of Organ Theft by Israel Add Insult to Injury in Gaza | Coverage of a report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/euro-mediterranean-human-rights-monitor | ? | WP:CRUNCHBASE; source is deprecated | ? | ✘ No |
https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/datacard/euro-med-human-rights-monitor?rid=326186932081-66&sid=142920 | Mirrors other sources, which lack independence. For example, the significant coverage comes directly from the Euro-Med HRM's website, and other coverage comes from the EU transparency register, which is populated by submissions from the organization | ? | ✘ No | |
https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122281718 | They normally provide "a profile in the words of the organization itself" | ? | Only one sentence of coverage; "Advocate for the human rights of all persons across Europe and the MENA region, particularly those who live under occupation, in the throes of war or political unrest and/or have been displaced due to persecution or armed conflict." | ✘ No |
3 by Richard A. Falk | Richard A. Falk is the chairman of Euro-Med HRM's Board of Directors | ? | ✘ No | |
4 by Reliefweb | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | ✘ No | |
5 by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency | Coverage is of EuroMed Rights, not Euro-Med HRM - different organization, with a very similar name. | ✘ No | ||
NGO Monitor's article 6 | Editor who presented the source has !voted for it to be deprecated | Two sentences of coverage containing highly contentious claims. The closest we have to WP:SIGCOV, but not good enough - particularily given how the source is about to be found unreliable at RSN. | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Independence of the content (or intellectual independence): the content must not be produced by interested parties. Often a related party produces a narrative that is then copied, regurgitated, and published in whole or in part by independent parties (as exemplified by churnalism). Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
The information in the Register is provided by the registrants themselves, on the understanding that they are ultimately responsible for its accuracy. The Secretariat monitors the quality of the Register’s content and reserves the right to de-register ineligible registrants, including those found not to observe the code of conduct.Their disclaimer says information is
not necessarily comprehensive, complete, accurate or up to date.
As stated on its website, information on the official EU Register is provided by registrants themselves, making it the sole responsibility of those organisations. It is recognised that some entries in the official register are inaccurate, incomplete or otherwise misleading.Based on this information, the EU Transparency Register and those relying on them are not reliable sources because the register does not have reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. S0091 ( talk) 16:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.BilledMammal ( talk) 13:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm not seeing significant coverage of the organization
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor’s leadership routinely posts antisemitic and pro-Hamas content onlineas being
coverage of a specific topic related to the organization? And what topic might that be, may I ask?
The Geneva-based human rights group has been at the forefront of exposing Israel’s crimes against humanity committed in occupied Palestinian territories
Israeli institutions... have attempted to spoil Euro-Med’s standing
I suspect that the editors arguing to keep this article would also reject the UN Watch article.
notoriously biased and antisemitic, and
routinely posts antisemitic and pro-Hamas content online. That isn't significant coverage of the organization.
There is consensus that an article should not exist at this title. There are several conflicting suggestions as to where to merge or redirect to. I would consider "no consensus", resulting in an effective keep of the article which nobody seems to favour, to be a poor option. I have therefore slightly arbitrarily decided the closure should be to redirect to Freedom Township, Ellis County, Kansas as it seems to have slightly more support than others, but nothing should be taken as preventing editors from retargeting if it transpires that there's a better choice, nor from merging any content they may wish to merge. Stifle ( talk) 09:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
A blatant example of a 4th class post office not being a town, as it geolocates onto a farm that is still there. And no, redirecting to Pfeifer, Kansas is a bad idea as they are not the same place. Mangoe ( talk) 05:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 08:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Back in the 1980s, this database was available on magnetic tape and was even printed out on paper, bound, and sold in book form. Ironically, Google then digitized the books, so it's possible to find out what the feature classes, which were squashed a few years ago, used to be years ago. This has confused several people in past AFD discussions who don't realize that what's available on a WWW site was once available as this "National Gazetteer of the United States", being exactly the same thing and exactly as bogus, before the World Wide Web was invented, because the GNIS was invented in the 1970s.
Things to remind yourself about the reliability of GNIS data: It's a government computer database that is an index to where words occur(ed) on government maps, mostly maps as they were in the 1980s. Like other government projects it was ambitious but was de-funded before the all-important fixing-the-errors-from-state-sources phase of the original plan kicked in. The "historical" records were dropped from the database tables quite a while ago. More recently, all of the feature classes, which used to make distinctions amongst cemeteries, locales, populated places, flats, tanks, summits, gaps, and so forth, were largely squashed.
For an article that explains the rural post offices, see the one that I cited in Bulloch County, Georgia#Further reading a couple of days ago. It does a fair job of explaining, with that county as a case study, how actual history happened, and thus why a lot of this "ghost town" and "unincorporated community" synthesis that people do, in desperation at trying to flesh out crap from the GNIS, is utter tripe. Rennick has documented an entire state full of examples of how post offices moved around with people's private homes and stores that they were run from.
Schools were the same, and there was no rule that school districts were coterminous with post office service areas. Adding them together to make places is synthesis, just as the still fake ghost-townery of Monroe, Kansas ( AfD discussion) is. This is "settled" land, but these were and are rural places without population centres. "At Monroe" is how the mail is delivered and (when it's a store) the general store supplies are shipped.
And in several of the midwestern states the "communities" were the (civil, not survey) Townships. (In Rennick's state they were the Creeks.) The Townships were the legally recognized populated places, for people wanting that rule, with census figures and legal authority. The Fifth Biennial Report of the Kansas State Board of Agriculture doesn't give a population figure for Easdale post office, because the post offices aren't the legally recognized populated places despite what the desperate Wikipedia synthesizers and false ghost-townery writers think; nor does it give populations for the 44 school districts that it mentions; but it does say that 451 people lived in Wheatland Township in 1885, which you wouldn't know from our every-article-in-Kansas-is-the-same crappy boilerplate article on the place.
Equally as sad as the Monroe ghost-townery synthesis is the fact that if Kansas editors had been any good at this then rather than a bland sweep of boilerplate across loads of Kansas articles we would have for years now known a lot more about the Germans from the Ellis County, Kansas#History article, and it wouldn't be lopsidedly placed in Pfeifer, Kansas (because, for starters, they didn't just settle in Pfeifer), and we'd even know a tiny bit about Hog Back, Kansas ( AfD discussion) and why it's not a settlement (the German settlers choosing not to settle it), because it's all in Francis S. Laing's history of the German-Russian Settlements in Ellis County, Kansas.
Comments: Not a town, sure, but a known community in the papers 1880 to 1904. Several mentions of meetings at the Easdale school house, mostly a hotbed of Socialists ... (so they called my Republican grandad).
To be fair, I never knew of Easdale until this week, but then, I had never been in Pfeifer until last April. The first election I remember was Dad taking me with him when he voted at one of the sister schools to Easdale. I make no claim of notabilty, but I acknowledge the community of that time. IveGoneAway ( talk) 05:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to discuss potential Merge targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article about a film award, not
properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for events. As always, awards are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:ORGDEPTH on third-party media coverage about them -- analysis about their impact, evidence that the media consider the award to be significant enough to cover the presentation as news, etc. -- but apart from one media hit (which isn't enough by itself) this is otherwise referenced entirely to a
reference-bombed cluster of 248
primary sources, mostly its own self-published website about itself but occasionally streaming copies of the films on YouTube or Vimeo, none of which are valid support for notability at all.
Simply existing isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have proper GNG-worthy coverage about it in real media independent of its own self-created web presence.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 23:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 22:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ellis County, Kansas. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
A Union Pacific passing siding/station, not a town: even the only real source in the article says so. Mangoe ( talk) 05:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reference (2) in the article appears to originate from page 480 of the Collections of the Kansas State Historical Society [34], where it states that Hog Back is "now Yocemento." Jbt89 ( talk) 18:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Uncle G ( talk) 19:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)In 1906, I. M. Yost and Professor Erasmus Haworth met in Hays and decided to build a cement plant at the hogback.
— Cable, Ted T.; Maley, Wayne (2017). Driving across Kansas: A Guide to I-70. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 9780700624140., p.85
References
[picture of] Harvey and Lyle Luce at the elevator their father operated at Hog Back.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 08:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 21:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nea Salamis Famagusta FC#Women's football. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Cypriot women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2011, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2021, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 20:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking for reliable sources, I only find https://www2.northwestmuseum.org/museum/participant-fitch-alice-underwood-3477.htm. If that biography precedes the Wikipedia article then the Wikipedia article is a clear copyright violation. If the Wikipedia article precedes the posted biography at the Northwest Museum of Arts and Culture, then using it as a source would be circular. I am not finding much else in WP:BEFORE to bring this up to wiki standards. Bringing it to the group for consideration. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 22:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 20:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Obscure single with no elaboration or sources, should redirect to the song "Late" on Late Registration. As it exists, the article has no reason to exist. Same logic applies to Fade (Blue Angel song) and I Had a Love. -1ctinus📝 🗨 20:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Others on the talk page raised concerns about the credibility/validity of this article about 10 years ago [38].
Although I attempted to revamp the lead, it became extremely clear to me that this article's sources are only primary sources, and that this entire piece seems extremely self-promoation. In order for this to be possibly made into a credible/balanced wikipedia article a lot of work is needed, and that assumes that it even warrents a page. As far as I can tell, this is not a commonly used measure. (And I say that as someone who teaches classes about personality psychology and psychological testing.) Mason ( talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this meets WP:NPOL, she didn't win the republican primary and it looks like there's mostly just normal campaign coverage about her. BuySomeApples ( talk) 19:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 23:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:NFILM. Trailer and teaser were released in summer 2022, along with routine WP:NEWSORGINDIA coverage that the film was being made, but I can't find a single mention of it online since then in English or Malayalam (e വലയം), let alone a release date. WP:SPA article creator is an associate director of the film, and has declared at his user talk page that he's here to promote himself and his work. See also WP:Articles for deletion/Sreejith Mohandas. WP:TOOSOON at best. Wikishovel ( talk) 19:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
It has been suspected to be a hoax article. Although there is some coverage from some analog sources that mention a person of that name from the 17th Century, I thoroughly checked and the in-line sources listed fail verification of the claimed statements. I looked the subject up via Wikipedia Library for further sources and was unable to find any organized and detailed coverage of the subject. I don't see how it qualifies for an article (and there's dubious sourcing with failed verification spreading misinformation). X ( talk) 19:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Thanks to the research and work on the article Star Mississippi 04:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It's not clear that this promotional program is notable - the majority of sources in the article point to the program's own website. The article was created by a single purpose account banned for sockpuppetry who has ties to DISCUS, the organization that created this program.
There was discussion on the article's Talk page back in 2008 suggesting that the article should be deleted, but it was never nominated. Martey ( talk) 19:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The article notes: "So when the opportunity arose to travel to President George Washington's Mount Vernon estate, the starting point of the American Whiskey Trail (www.americanwhiskeytrail.com) ... The linking together of seven distilleries and half a dozen historical sites is in large part the brainchild of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS) ... It was a good note to end on, as my mind was already down river heading toward the second stop of the Whiskey Trail--Kentucky. ... My stops along this stretch of the American Whiskey Trail included four of Kentucky's finest: Jim Beam, Maker's Mark, Wild Turkey, and Woodford Reserve -- distilleries as unique to one another as the closely guarded yeast strains they use in their whiskey-making processes."
The article notes: "Aficionados and novices alike can avail themselves of this experience by visiting any or all the seven distilleries that are part of the American Whiskey Trail. Sponsored by the Distilled Spirits Council of the U.S., or DISCUS, the trail is spread over a five-state area from New York to Tennessee by way of Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. I recently traversed about 1,000 miles, often on twisting, narrow rural roads and byways, to hit the distilleries in a four-day span before taking in Mount Vernon, Va. ... The distilleries open to the public are in Kentucky (Jim Beam in Clermont; Maker's Mark in Loretto; Wild Turkey in Lawrenceburg; and Woodford Reserve in Versailles) and Tennessee (George Dickel in Tullahoma and Jack Daniel's in Lynchburg). ... Trying to sum up the allure of the American Whiskey Trail in a sentence is difficult. I ran into any number of nondrinkers who were visiting just out of curiosity about the culture of whiskey-making - a process often carried out in "dry" counties where liquor cannot be sold."
The book notes: "Nearly four thousand miles away in the New World, there is another historic trail-the American Whiskey Trail, which includes seven historic sites and six operating whiskey distilleries spread over a five-state arc between New York and Tennessee by way of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Kentucky. If that seems a slightly awkward physical construct, perhaps it is. But it shows the erratic progression of whiskey-making throughout America history, the watershed moment of which occurred before George Smith's rise to prominence. Traveling from the north, the American Whiskey Trail begins at historic Fraunces Tavern Museum in Manhattan. It was the site of General George Washington's farewell address to his troops in 1783 and operates as a commercial business to this day. The trail ends at the recently rebuilt site of the George Washington Distillery Museum on the grounds of private citizen Washington's home and farm at Mount Vernon, Virginia. There they refer to that site as the gateway to the trail. Geographic chauvinism obviously is dictated by where you live. In between, visitors take in a string of historic taverns, whiskey museums, and distillery centers. One of them is in the West Overton Museums complex in Scottdale, Pennsylvania, a former distillery center and part of what is billed as the only pre-Civil War village in Pennsylvania still intact. Its heritage links the Old World and the New."
The book notes: "The American Whiskey Trail, a list of whiskey-related sites collected by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, is a visible history of America's romance with distilled spirits. Some of the sites primarily associated with Bourbon and Tennessee whiskeys are listed in Chapter 6. The following list shows the locations associated primarily with American blended whiskey. Put the two together and you have one wonderful trip."
The book lists Gadsby's Tavern Museum, George Washington's Distillery, Oliver Miller Homestead, Oscar Getz Museum of Whisky, West Overton Museums, and Woodsville Plantation.
The book notes: "Once you have traveled the Kentucky Bourbon Trail, if you want to continue your “studies" on bourbon and American whiskey, you might consider a journey on the American Whiskey Trail. You can begin the trail wherever you like, but note that the George Washington Distillery in Mount Vernon, Virginia, is considered the “gateway” to the trail. There is some overlap between the Kentucky Bourbon Trail and the American Whiskey Trail, so you can decide to either revisit some locations or move on to those that you have not seen yet. Allegany Museum—Cumberland, Maryland. Angel's Envy—Louisville, Kentucky. Barton 1792 Distillery—Bardstown, Kentucky. Bradford House Museum—Washington, Pennsylvania. Buffalo Trace—Frankfort, Kentucky."
The book notes: "In 2004, the Distilled Spirits Council launched the American Whiskey Trail tourism initiative to celebrate the cultural heritage and history of spirits, such as moonshine, in America. The American Whiskey Trail includes museums, such as the Allegheny Museum in Cumberland, Maryland; Oscar Getz Museum of Whiskey History in Bardstown, Kentucky; and Whiskey Rebellion sites such as Oliver Miller Homestead in South Park, Pennsylvania, and Woodville Plantation, the John and Presley Neville House in Bridgeville, Pennsylvania. Distilleries are also part of the American Whiskey Trail. These include icons like Jack Daniel's in Lynchburg, Tennessee; Jim Beam in Clermont, Kentucky; Maker's Mark in Loretto, Kentucky; and Wild Turkey in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. Also included are George Washington's Distillery at Historic Mount Vernon in Alexandria, Virginia; George Dickel in Tullahoma, Tennessee; Stitzel-Weller Distillery in Louisville, Kentucky; and Woodford Reserve in Versailles, Kentucky."
The article notes: "To tell the story, the Distilled Spirits Council mapped a route it calls the American Whiskey Trail that runs in an arc from Washington, D.C., through Pennsylvania and Kentucky into Tennessee, and Dominic and I and a few other passionate whiskey-philes set out to follow it. The trail officially starts in Mount Vernon, Virginia, the home of America’s first president. ... the master distiller at George Dickel Whisky in Tullahoma, Tennessee, where we pick up the trail."
The article notes: "The American Whiskey Trail is pinging the radar of whiskey-loving tourists. ... Despite being distilled in the Appalachian foothills for centuries, the idea of a formal “trail” is a relatively new concept. The “American Whiskey Trail” only dates back to 2004, when the Distilled Spirits Council recognised the growing interest and realised there was a need for a more organised visitor experience. The trail is not a linear route, rather it snakes around points of interest, such as historic bars, museums, coopers, and still-makers. The distilleries remain the real focus, however. These five are the most interesting distilleries I visited on the trail, though I should also give a mention to cooperages such as Brown-Forman and still-maker Vendome Copper & Brass, both in Louisville."
The article notes: "The chief historian at Mount Vernon, the first president's Potomac-side mansion, disclosed plans Tuesday for the George Washington Distillery Museum, which will be become the gateway for a new American Whiskey Trail. The trail is meant to be enjoyed much like the spirit: slowly, as it will feature museums and historic sites in five states. ... The trail goes from the Fraunces Tavern Museum in New York City, where Washington bade farewell to his troops in 1783, through several museums and plantations in Pennsylvania. It includes distilleries in Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky. ... Distillers and historians toasted Tuesday's opening of the trail with a historic rye whiskey, the first made on the grounds of Mount Vernon since Washington's distillery closed in 1797. "
The article notes: "This is where our education on the drink that nursed a newborn nation begins, in the heart of the Bluegrass State, home to five stops on the American Whiskey Trail. Sponsored by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, the trail consists of more than a dozen public distillery tours, museums and cultural sites across five states. Most are within easy striking distance for troops stationed on the East Coast. Some of the more popular stops on the trail, begun in 2004 to showcase the long-standing distilling tradition in the U.S., draw more than 50,000 visitors each year. ... There is no real batting order for the American Whiskey Trail. Like baseball fans hoping to visit every major league city or hikers who set out to conquer the national parks, whiskey aficionados can start wherever they see fit."
The article notes: "The industry doesn't just rely on consumption, but tourism, something I recently witnessed first-hand while following the "American Whiskey Trail" on a press trip organized by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States. Admirers of Tennessee whisky or Kentucky bourbon can easily spend a week touring grand ol' distilleries like those of Jack Daniel's, Maker's Mark and Jim Beam.If the Whiskey Trail has a Disney World, it's Jack Daniel's sprawling distillery in Lynchburg, Tenn., which welcomes more than 250,000 tourists each year ... When you get past its quaint facade, the sheer scale of the 1,800-acre distillery becomes apparent; behind the old-timey buildings, folksy tour guides and magic cave spring (Whiskey Trail pilgrims soon learn that each distillery claims water superiority over the competition) ..."
There is enough information in the sources I found to support a standalone article that discusses each stop of the American Whiskey Trail. A merge to Distilled Spirits Council of the United States would lead to the loss of sourced content or be undue weight if everything is merged. Cunard ( talk) 10:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
a standalone article that discusses each stop of the American Whiskey Trailwould be encyclopedic. Per WP:N, an article needs to both meet GNG and WP:NOT. In this case, Wikipedia is not a travel guide, particularly where many of the sources you've cited are 5+ years old and some of the distilleries and other locations on the tour have very likely changed since those reviews were written. An article noting that the trail exists and describing each stop on the trail would quickly go out of date and would not be useful to readers. I think a redirect to DISCUS, perhaps merging a list of the current locations of the trial and citing to more recent reviews, would be appropriate. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 21:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Article is mostly promo added by IPs. Barely any encyclopedic content would remain if promo is removed. No sources found on this guy besides social media, IMDB, and self-published stuff. Catalyzzt ( talk) 19:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This place does not seem to exist. The map points to a place called Arabic: شياء, romanized: šyā and I can't find any place with a similar spelling on CityPopulation which has a complete database for Oman sourced from the Omani institute of statistics. Broc ( talk) 18:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm it meets WP:N or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I helped discover that the subject is probably running a sockpuppet farm; regardless, he’s a relentless self-promoter, but the claims to notability are decidedly slender. Most of the sourcing is more or less directly connected to him, which doesn’t encourage a finding of notability. — Biruitorul Talk 18:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. List on a random topic and a random geographic region with a random amount of elements (19). Are there reliable sources discussing the amount of airports in the Balkans or something like that that could show this article to be necessary? Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 18:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
the borders of the Balkans are, due to many contrasting definitions, disputed. As such, the inclusion criteria are not clear, which contravenes WP:LISTCRIT. Likewise,
one accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. I do not see evidence that airports specifically in the Balkans (regardless of the definition of the region) are a group that are discussed collectively in sources. -- Kinu t/ c 23:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBLP; some refs are WP:BLPSPS (instagram, linkedin) and most others only mention the subject in passing; possibly written by the subject ( WP:COI), etc. As written, this appears to be essentially a self-published CV. That said, the subject – who is a medical school student – sounds like a very serious and dedicated person who may well go on to accomplish great things that will lead to ample sources that could establish future WP:GNG. Cl3phact0 ( talk) 18:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. It's been suggested that there may be more coverage coming soon, but for now it's a delete. WP:REFUND is the place to go to get the article restored to draft when you're ready. Stifle ( talk) 09:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Since that removal, one more source has been added, but it's a mostly primary-source interview. Personally, I still don't see notability, and I don't think having her byline appear frequently on Wikipedia would be enough to get her there. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 16:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)I can find plenty of Rolling Stone bylines from Spanos, and she is a writer I'm familiar with (I even follow her on Twitter), but I don't see any reliable coverage that indicates major notability. Of the sources here, two are bios from her employers, and the third is WP:FORBESCON, and I couldn't find anything else.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Soft delete contested by recreation without improvement. Still [f]ails NLIST, CLN and NOTTVGUIDE. A massive unsourced programming guide, very very few wls, no CLN value, no sources showing this meets NLIST. Nothing sourced to merge, no proper redirect target
* Pppery *
it has begun... 16:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This topic lacks notability in academia. The article is essentially based on two references, ref1: "Optimal scheduling in film production to minimize talent hold cost" ( Cited by 52), ref2 "Iterative local search methods for the talent scheduling problem" (Cited by 7). Both references are lacking citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 桃花影落飞神剑 ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Been on the CAT:NN list for 10+ years and never been referenced correctly. Seems to be non-notable. Unable to identify anything about them. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 16:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
An accountant doing his job, hardly anything of note, fails WP:GNG. HistoriesUnveiler ( talk) 15:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Keith J. Krach as a viable ATD. While there is not currently consensus to merge, the history remains should that eventuate. Star Mississippi 04:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE. Previously soft-deleted, recreation was requested by the same editor, who has stated on their user page that their sole goal here on Wikipedia is to write an article on this topic, and has made no further improvements since restoration to the state of the last AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 15:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I don't understand why the deletion of this page is so important. I believe all the people here are well versed in Wikipedia and they can fix the page to help the readers and the Wikipedia community. I created this page to help people I don't know why its being portrayed like I committed some type of sin. I only tried to create a full informative page and why would I promote anything and what benefit I can get from it? I read and researched extensively about Wikipedia guidelines and tutorials then finalized the content, so I guess you can help by editing the page because I know it contains a lot of reliable sources and the subject is notable not sure why its being denied as something that is not notable, I feel maybe de to political aspect or I'm not sure. TBH I'm pretty disappointed at the moment.... Not a single person is interested in editing the page and fixing it to the level they think is fine... Anyway, I respect opinions and I won't mind the outcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tickingtime ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
And I read WP:ORGRITE the primary criteria already verifies its notability but I'll leave it maybe I'm knocking at the wrong door. Tickingtime ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 15:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage about the company. Sources are all either covering routine business transactions or are primary. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I won't vote without a BEFORE search, but I'm entirely unconvinced any of the sources in article are sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH Mach61 ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Provincial Court of Manitoba. ✗ plicit 00:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if sources are added to article that meet WP:SIGCOV and are not routine mill news. // Timothy :: talk 05:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No argument for deletion has been advanced except the nominating editor's. A merge can be proposed and discussed on the relevant talk page outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 03:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Article has been around for a long time. Footballer who perished before making his debut for a big club, brings WP:ONEEVENT and WP:NOTMEMORIAL into question. Despite there being a significant coverage cited in the article already, it doesn't necessarily mean that the subject should have its own article. A more natural place to discuss the subject would be at 1994–95 Liverpool F.C. season. Geschichte ( talk) 14:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a successful model but I couldn't find enough sources to verify she meets WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG criteria. The club has never played in a professional Czech competition (top two tiers) and only briefly appeared in the 3rd tier in 2010–11. FromCzech ( talk) 13:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus established for GNG and SIGCOV. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG criteria. The club has never played in a professional Czech competition (top two tiers), not even in the 3rd tier. FromCzech ( talk) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article likely suffers from major WP:OR (only linked sources are someone's genealogy page, other sources are hard to verify). The subject does not appear notable (the article is just a list of family relations, and in fact 90% of it seems to be about other people - her relatives). See related ongoing AfDs on articles created by the same author: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Skopovny, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubikowski family with Ostoja coat of arms. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The article has been pointed out as a possible hoax filled with misinformation. You can see the talk page. I couldn't find reliable coverage of the actual subject of the article without the ones copied from this article in mirror sites. The article's sources showcase that Google has a patent, but there's no proof or coverage where it establishes that it got developed. X ( talk) 12:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM. Has been lacking any sources since 2019. I have searched and can’t find any reliable independent secondary sources required to establish notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 12:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment - the article has been through the AfD process several times before - the result was Delete, however in both cases the article was re-created without addressing the issue of its lack of references. Given the article is about a 2008 album, if there are no sources for it now it is highly unlikely that there will ever be adequate sources and as such if at the conclusion of this AfD it is decided to delete there may be grounds to WP:SALT as well. Dan arndt ( talk) 01:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
She doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 11:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 13:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Ambiguous title, so redirect anywhere could be misleading. Non-notable author. Boleyn ( talk) 10:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO. All I can find in an online search in English is about the same as the current sources: a mix of interviews (WP:PRIMARY) in RS like Daily Trust, Daily Nigerian and Nigerian Tribune, and puff pieces on music blogs. The RS also pretty consistently describe her as "upcoming", "budding", etc. She's put out a single EP, with no charts in evidence, the sources cited for regular radio rotation are music blogs, and the station named isn't national per WP:MUSICBIO #11. Wikishovel ( talk) 09:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This article also raises concerns regarding its notability. Despite thorough research, I was unable to locate reliable sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, as stipulated by the guidelines outlined in WP:SIGCOV. Furthermore, the article fails to meet the mandatory requirement of WP:NSOFT. This policy ensures that articles of this nature adhere to specific criteria. Barseghian Lilia ( talk) 10:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Clear example of WP:COATRACK. Not notable except for WP:ONEEVENT which includes her sole published book No Turning Back and telemovie both about the event. No longer a suspect either since 2005 conviction of Murdoch. She is famous so has lots of coverage in reliable sources but this is not the same as being notable in her own right. This event has separate articles about Murder of Peter Falconio and Bradley John Murdoch who are the main victim and perpetrator respectively. Darrelljon ( talk) 10:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The TV program exits, but there is not a single independent source to consider it as a notable program. For those wishing to check in native language, use the translated title :"आफ्नो नेपाल आफ्नो गौरव" nirmal ( talk) 10:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even if we assume that WP:NJOURNALS, while being a non-binding essay, is currently our best-practice on the topic, the Keep views have still failed to establish how the article meets NJOURNALS (other than the sweeping Criterion 1.b, which failed to reach consensus), and have not adequately refuted the claims it fails even under these overly permissive criteria. Kudos to Ritchie333 for the final relist, which allowed participants another week to address the GNG and NJOURNALS concerns. This discussion is also echoed in a similar AfD - WP:Articles for deletion/European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Owen× ☎ 00:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but I couldn't find the sources to show it is notable. I may be missing something though from not reading Arabic. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can get this resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 20:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:NJOURNALS is not a notability guideline, and does not address nominator's implicit
WP:DEL-REASON#8 rationale. More discussion around established
policies and guidelines would be helpful in determining notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 18:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 15:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I closed this as "no consensus", but was challenged, so I am relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 10:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Moving to draft per consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 04:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Ranges from press releases, "community contributor"s, and other non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources. Aside from possible WP:UPE, idependent/reliable sources here only mention Bill Hutchens per WP:ROUTINE. TLA (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NBOOK Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them.See also MOS:WAF. The notability of the franchise is a red herring, as it has no bearing on whether this topic should have a stand-alone article. TompaDompa ( talk) 06:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
“ | Other paratexts followed, including the 1999 release of Sunnydale High Yearbook, co-authored by tie-in phenoms Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. The Yearbook is designed with verisimilitude in mind, as if it is an actual high school yearbook—complete with “signatures” on the inside front and back covers, “handwritten” notes throughout, and descriptions of school events from the show’s diegesis such as Halloween, the Talent Show, the Sadie Hawkins Dance, and the Spring Fling, accompanied, of course, with pictures from the corresponding episodes as if they had been taken by the yearbook committee. Transmedial by nature, both of these kinds of paratexts suggest a life for the show beyond its televisual borders. Obviously, BtVS did not invent these kind of paratexts; other shows such as Twin Peaks and The X-Files had companion books and guides, too, but situated temporally as it was within the nascent phenomenon of online fandom, the paratextual BtVS experience was highly influential in how later shows—particularly those aimed at the 18–35 demographic—were wooed through such cultural products. | ” |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The book notes: "Golden, Christopher, and Nancy Holder. Sunnydale High Yearbook. New York: Simon, 1999. Print. 112p. A fully realized fake yearbook for the Sunnydale High graduating class of '99, many of whom survived the graduation ceremony and went on to future careers. There are reports on Homecoming, including runners-up Cordelia Chase and Buffy Summers, Homecoming fashion perspectives from Harmony Kendall, and reports from the chess, computer, dance, and drama clubs. There are updates on prime student hangouts around Sunnydale, including The Bronze, the Zoo, Putters' Green, the Mall, and the Sun Cinema. The swim team had an unfortunate year, with the coach and several members mysteriously missing. The "In Memoriam” section at the back is inevitably rather long, and includes Herbert the Pig, school mascot. On the bright side, the school had the lowest annual mortality rate in recent history."
The review notes: "Ultimately, Yearbook scrapes the bottom of the trivia sarcophagus: Even having seen every episode, I couldn’t place some of the so-called key references, like the endless rosters of Sunnydale’s sports teams. About as informative as a rerun—and not nearly as entertaining. C-"
The article notes: "... this year there's one gift that will make you look smart, funny and cool. And, really, that's why we give gifts, isn't it? To look cool? It's "The Sunnydale High 1999 Yearbook" (Pocket Books, $16.95). That's the school that just graduated Buffy Summers, the once-in-a-generation slayer, enemy of vampires, demons and other evil creatures with bad skin. What we've got here is one of the best TV tie-in gifts in years, a clever connection to "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" that's as ironic as the series. To sum up the year, the yearbook gushes: "We're proud to say the class of '99 has the lowest mortality rate of any graduating class." It's hard to compete with that kind of achievement, but here are a few more gift ideas for people who just love TV. It comes with senior class photos and summaries, pictures of activities (proms, graduation, demon attacks), and autographs to Buffy (Willow wrote: "You made me grow. Not in a getting bigger way. Another way.")."
The book notes: "Other paratexts followed, including the 1999 release of Sunnydale High Yearbook, co-authored by tie-in phenoms Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. The Yearbook is designed with verisimilitude in mind, as if it is an actual high school yearbook—complete with "signatures" on the inside front and back covers, "handwritten" notes throughout, and descriptions of school events from the show's diegesis such as Halloween, the Talent Show, the Sadie Hawkins Dance, and the Spring Fling, accompanied, of course, with pictures from the corresponding episodes as if they had been taken by the yearbook committee. Transmedial by nature, both of these kinds of paratexts suggest a life for the show beyond its televisual borders."
The article notes: "Young adult. Sunnydale High Yearbook, by Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder, 1999. Even though Buffy and her crew have immersed themselves in college life, at times they will feel nostalgic for their former high school. Because the actual building is a huge mass of charred rubble, they will have to turn to the Sunnydale High Yearbook to relive their memories. And now so can you. Buffy's yearbook, complete with color pictures, messages from classmates and an "in memoriam" section that lists people who fell to the evil in Sunnydale, is available for you to look at."
The result was keep. More consensus for keep than drafify, as well as it passes guidelines after the major expansion. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Nikolay Atanasov
This biography of an Olympic athlete was created under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only reference is a database entry.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Primary, database bio | 1. "Николай Атанасов – СКЛА ЛОКОМОТИВ ПЛОВДИВ". atletikalokomotiv.com (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Interview, primary | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b "Джоко: Сега е моето време". Sportal.bg (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Database listing | 3. ^ "Bulgarian Indoor Championships". GBR Athletics. Athletics Weekly. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Database listing | 4. ^ "Bulgarian Championships". GBR Athletics. Athletics Weekly. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Database listing | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Nikolay Atanasov at World Athletics Edit this at Wikidata |
Database listing | 6. ^ "Senior 2003: Long Jump men". World Athletics. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Mill news about event | 7. ^ Blitz.bg/Sport. "Джоко шампион на България за седми път". Blitz.bg/sport (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Mill news about subject opening a business | 8. ^ "Джоко стана бизнесмен". BGathletic.com (in Bulgarian). |
Loved by some and reviled by others, Joko [Atanasov's nickname] is one of the most interesting and eccentric personalities– it is guaranteed that there is further coverage of this out there, but already we seem to have enough (expansion proves WP:NBASIC, plus the one random source I clicked on is WP:SPORTBASIC pass). WP:DRAFTIFY is effectively a death sentence for articles without an interested editor who will try to save it; not seeing the point of doing it here. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content? The fact that over 1,000 words can be written in the article make this a crystal clear pass of WP:NBASIC. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus among editors to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 08:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Stub politics article, the criteria for it being nominated are as follows: poorly sourced Content Fork WP:CF covered else where by Social Class, Political Class, Marxian class theory, and Class conflict... but also Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT.
Examples of poor sourcing are as follows: "Israel/Palestine : the quest for dialogue" (1991) [64] by Gordon & Gordon, does not contain the terms on 145 as claimed, likewise "Specters of Marx" (1994) [65], by Jacques Derrida, and "French intellectual nobility : institutional and symbolic transformations in the post-Sartrian era" (1996) [66] by Niilo Kauppi both do not contain the terms "Oppressor" and "Oppressed" at all. This leaves four disparate sources (two from Marxists, one from a conservative, and one about Israel Palestine) which technically pass verifiability, but don't seem to be discussing a unified concept or theory at all. Besides which, as mentioned earlier, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. RecardedByzantian ( talk) 06:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 22:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic. PROD removed. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 07:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable "list" topic. This was created as a spin-out/subpage of Michigan Technological University Winter Carnival by archivists at the school, and I agree that it is too long as currently formed to go back into that parent article. But I don't see that this content is of encyclopediac value at all (NOTDIR, and DUE even if it were to be merged back in). In order to merit an own page, it needs to be a notable actual topic, not just "overflow from some other notable-topic's article". DMacks ( talk) 05:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Wisconsin#District 3. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable WP:NPOL: candidate not elected to any office yet, currently one of three candidates running in a primary election for selection as a party's nominated candidate for a November 2024 election to national office. In a WP:BEFORE search I can find only routine local coverage. Wikishovel ( talk) 04:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect >>>> 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Wisconsin#District 3 Djflem ( talk) 07:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Did not find any sources about this composer and the only source used for his article is just a list of credits for games they composed. GamerPro64 04:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 03:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST. A google news search comes up with a namesake in Australia. LibStar ( talk) 02:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
It is unclear what the exact topic is here. Whether it is the concept of provable fairness / provably fair games, or a specific algorithm dubbed as "Provably Fair" sourced to a gambling site [74]. Either way, there does not seem to be significant coverage in reliable sources, especially for the later. MarioGom ( talk) 17:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Was just gonna leave tags on this, but they've been reverted, so I guess I may as well do this instead. Sources on this page consist of primaries (one from the game, two from Capcom's website), one database (Behind the Voice Actors), and a couple from what I believe are third party game guide books. I don't know the reliability of all of those sources (BtVA I can't imagine being reliable, and the non-primaries I wouldn't expect to be), but I know none of them convey notability. Otherwise, this page is full of what could probably be summarized as fancruft that is better left to fan sites than here, especially with none of it sourced. Could redirect to Darkstalkers#Characters, though I think deletion makes more sense since that section doesn't currently have any sort of list or significant detail on any individual characters. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 02:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep, agree that this is something to be handled with cleanup and not deletion. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 18:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Charlie Puth. Sandstein 18:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This song has not been the subject of "multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label" as required by WP:NSONGS. As such, it is unlikely to ever grow beyond stub status and the content to present it as a standalone article does not exist. The New Zealand "Hot Singles" entry does not constitute a significant national chart, and it is usually relegated to a footnote on the discography page. N Ø 18:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 01:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Small nucleolar RNA. Liz Read! Talk! 08:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; based off one source and WP:BEFORE was no help. One source has only very slight, passing coverage that I doubt even verifies most of the claims here anyway. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Transactions per second. Sandstein 20:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
scholar.google.com
search brings up a ton of articles discussing both. I really don't understand how/why the notability of this subject is being questioned.
Sohom (
talk) 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 04:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 01:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion on pl wiki ( pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2024:02:05:Hans Skopowny). Likely hoax or WP:OR on non-notable individual. Sources impossible to verify (no ISBNs/URLs, either false or translated from Ukrainian to a variant that doesn't exist outside Wikipedia). All other articles of the creator likely suffer from the same issue (over a dozen: [75]). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article speedy deleted from pl wiki for "Non-encyclopedic article: ahistorical family fantasies, misspelled". We should do the same. It does not seem this family is notable ( WP:GNG), and WP:OR is a major issue. Sources are not possible to verify - no URLs, no ISBNs for the book, the titles of the books and other information seem to be translated from Ukrainian/Russian making it impossible to verify they even exist since Wikipedia is the only place they are used in this version. Possible hoax - hard to guess whether this is indeed OR on one's family or something at the level of Zhemao hoaxes. Pretty much all other articles of that editor need to be deleted for the same reason, I'll be nominating them shortly. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[...] this Hierophant-Warrior dynasty, which ruled almost the all ancient World, bore the unique Devine kingship. It was a Universal Vedic Slovic-Aryan civilization existed for millennia in the territory from Dublin to Vladivostok [...].
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Orphan article. Over 50 references, but how many of those actually constitute significant coverage in reliable sources? I'm not sure I've seen enough here to be convinced this passes WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 15:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable actress with no significant coverage in reliable sources. The only significant coverage cited in the article are interviews, which lack independence; the rest of the articles cited are trivial mentions. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 03:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV. External links are not WP:INDEPENDENT, either. Maybe someone who has a grasp on Mandarin Chinese can speak upon this. TLA (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
This is the same article as the one found by 94rain ( talk · contribs) but is a non-paywalled copy of the article from the source that originally published it. The article notes: "纵观其履历,罗熹在农行任职时间最久,达22年,在工行工作4年,在中国出口信用保险公司工作3年,在华润集团工作将近3年,执掌太平集团2年时间。在任职太平集团一把手期间,罗熹还任太平保险集团(香港)公司、太平保险控股董事长,并兼任太平人寿、太平资产等多个太平子公司董事长。"
From Google Translate: "Looking at his resume, Luo Xi has worked at the Agricultural Bank of China for the longest time, reaching 22 years. He has worked at ICBC for 4 years, at China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation for 3 years, at China Resources Group for nearly 3 years, and at the helm of Taiping Group for 2 years. While serving as the top leader of Taiping Group, Luo Xi also served as the chairman of Taiping Insurance Group (Hong Kong) Company and Taiping Insurance Holdings, and concurrently served as the chairman of several Taiping subsidiaries such as Taiping Life Insurance and Taiping Assets."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 17:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 23:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Hazaras. Fails WP:NBOOKS. As part of WP:BEFORE, checked sourcing on interlanguage links as well but failed to turn up sources or coverage that would meet notability. Longhornsg ( talk) 06:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
From this 1 December 2016 obituary Internet Archive for Mary Ann Siegfried, the editor of the Afghanistan Forum: ""After two years, she returned home to Ohio via freighter and soon set out for New York City, where she landed a job with the Asia Society. The nonprofit’s mission was to introduce Americans to Asia, “since most people didn’t even know where it was,” she told The Star. Through editing the society’s newsletter on Afghanistan, The Afghanistan Forum, for more than 25 years, she became an expert on that country.""
The book review notes: "Poladi was not a polished scholar and the book has certain weaknesses. He has assembled and attempted to use virtually everything he could find on his subject; hence, the inclusion of some unnecessary material. The comments of poorly informed travelers are treated with the same respect as the measured reports of thorough scholars. Nevertheless, after extensive summaries of such diverse works he usually comes to defensible conclusions of his own, and, despite his evident apologetic purpose, he presents a reasonable and plausible image of the Hazara experience. Indeed, weaknesses aside, this book is a rich mine of information on the Hazaras, for Poladi's inclusion of everything that is known about them makes it an incomparable source on the subject. The book is a kind of final utterance of Hassan Poladi, "a project of the heart," as someone close to him put it, for he passed away in the same year his book was published."
The review notes: "This book is remarkable in a number of regards. Most importantly, being a Hazara from Pakistan, enjoying access to Hazara American informants, and having received his tertiary education in his adopted country America, Poladi is in the unique position to relate the subject matter both as an insider and as a Western-trained scholar. He deserves much credit for his sincere and mostly successful endeavor to depict the Hazara’s world in an unbiased fashion, despite his admitted difficulties in detaching himself emotionally at all times, particularly while dealing with his people’s suffering through slavery and war. The exclusive use of the author's own technical and financial resources — aside from other persons' occasional help (e.g. typing, editing, translating, and library access) — makes The Hazäras the rather impressive result of a virtually single-handed effort."
The review further notes: "The Härzaras has more than its fair share of grammatical and orthographic errors, inconsistencies and inadequacies. Inclusion of page headers would have facilitated quick reference. Captions in the body of the text ought to have been consistent with those in the List of Illustrations. The sporadic appearance of unexplained abbreviations in the bibliography ought to have been avoided. The subject index ought to have been extended to include all section headings. However, none of this lessens the value of Poladi's work to any significant degree. Being an important addition to the hitherto all too meager store of publications about this interesting nation, The Hazäras definitely deserves the attention of those interested in any Central-Asia-related aspect of Afghan studies."
The short review notes: "The Häzaras, by Hassan Poladi. Stockton, CA: Mughal Publishing, 1989. xvi + 431 pages. Append. Bibl. Index. $19.95. A detailed study of the Hazara people of Afghanistan. Examines social customs, religion, history, language, and economy. Also includes a chronology and commentaries on rulers from 1370. (JDM)"
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss sources Cunard identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 23:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this meets WP:NPROF, unless the professional memberships are prestigious enough to carry the page on their own. I cleaned this article up a bit and removed non-RSes and sources that don't mention the subject. Some of the refs are still social media or screenshots of certificates or webpages though. BuySomeApples ( talk) 23:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::But he is considered to be a notable person as an academic isn't he? Maybe he is notable just not as an academic.
BulgarianCat (
talk) 10:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I suggest taking a look at the history of this page. I put a bunch of effort into trying to clear this up, but the amount of peacock editing and bullshit is just irreparable. Claiming to have founded things she's not credited for, lots of self-published sources, lots of awards by organisations she's connected to.
I've already removed the more offensive examples, but I actually think this article is unsaveably promotional and when you take it all away, I don't think there's anything left. For what it's worth, it's noted on the user page of the user who wrote the article that Hall asked them to write the article in the first place.
I've spent the last 30 minutes looking through mounds of shit for sigcov and I'm not seeing it. If anyone thinks there's something there, be my guest. BrigadierG ( talk) 23:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Restored from a long-ago PROD per request of the subject, but unsourced for the decade before that. BD2412 T 23:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
An Islamic Shia scholar and former representative of Shia marja' Abu-al-Qasim al-Khoei in the United States until 1982, article only lists two sources one of which is an Amazon link to one of his book, fails WP:GNG. Last two works mentioned in the article do not appear to be written by him, and all except for first ones are translations of other works. Lolekek ( talk) 23:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails to pass General notability guidelines Death Editor 2 ( talk) 22:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. This does not preclude a rename or speedy renomination at a time when input might be forthcoming. Star Mississippi 03:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The tournament is a youth (Asian Asian Group) tournament, rather than the main continental swimming championship. The previous tournament for the main tournament was in 2016 Tokyo (10th) while the previous edition for the actual tournament in Bangalore, India (10th Asian Age Group). There's a lack of resources to create an article for theAsian Age Group Championships that would satisfy WP:GNG either. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 11:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Is there a procedure to at least move this page to it's accurate title "2024 Asian Group Championships" while still under AfD, the page has been under a inaccurate title for too long. I have to emphasize that this is a different tournament than the senior Asian Championship yet again. In restrospect, I should have moved this first before nominating for deletion. Hariboneagle927 ( talk) 03:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:28, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Non notable coach/player with only affiliated sources and social media posts used to establish article. After a search I cannot find any non-affiliated sources regarding the subject.
Additionally, it appears the article may have been created by the own individual. Grahaml35 ( talk) 19:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looking for more feedback on newly presented sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:26, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Minor private equity firm without any sigcov that I can find. BrigadierG ( talk) 22:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. While a majority of editors have !voted for keep, editors in favor of deletion continue to maintain that strict organizational notability guidelines have not been met. The difference in evaluation comes down to differing assessments over the degree of independence of various examples of coverage cited in this discussion, as well as assessments as to whether coverage is of the organization, of its reports, or of its founders. A few keep !votes also made IAR arguments to the effect that this organization's reports' prominence in coverage relating to Israel-Palestine is sufficient to establish notability despite the fact that this coverage is generally not of significant depth regarding the organization. signed, Rosguill talk 15:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP; no coverage which is independent, reliable, and significant,
While there is a small amount of independent coverage of some of the initiatives it has launched and the reports it has published, this is not sufficient to establish notability per both
WP:INHERITORG and
WP:NCORP#Significant coverage of the company itself; Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.
Note that this article was previously deleted under a different name at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor; it was then recreated by a Euro-Med HRM employee under a number of names ( The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, etc) before finally "sticking" under the current name. The current article has also been edited by at least nine different Euro-Med HRM employees, mostly WP:UPEs.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181211-euro-med-hrm-saudi-arabia-has-forcibly-disappeared-3-libyans/ | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.marsad.ly/en/2021/05/19/euro-med-hrm-calls-for-disclosure-of-maps-for-mine-sites-in-libya/ | ? | Significant coverage of a "call" from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.euromedmonitor.org/en/About | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122281718 | ? Unclear where these profiles come from; whether they are from the organization | One sentence of coverage of their aims, and a list of its structure | ✘ No | |
https://www.ohchr.org/en/special-procedures/sr-palestine | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/report-special-rapporteur-situation-human-rights-palestinian-8 | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/israels-icc-rebuttal-admission-war-crimes-rights-group | Significant coverage of a statement from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://mondoweiss.net/2018/07/family-visits-imprisoned/ | Republication of a republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ~ | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/2890/Euro-Med-announces-changes-in-its-administrative-and-executive-structure | About-self | ? | ? | ✘ No |
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-targets-rights-defenders-un-council-hears/1992437 | WP:RSP for Anadolu Agency (controversial topics, international politics) | Significant coverage of a statement from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/author/ramy-abdu/ | ? | ? | Focused on Ramy Abdu; no significant coverage of Ramy Abdu or Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/ramy-abdu/ | ? | ? | Focused on Ramy Abdu; no significant coverage of Ramy Abdu or Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2019/08/27/as-mena-states-grow-increasingly-repressive-businesses-should-lead-reform/ | Published by Ramy Abdu | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/staff | About-self | ? | ? | ✘ No |
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/101164 | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://imemc.org/article/euro-med-monitor-report-suffocation-and-isolation-15-years-of-israeli-blockade-on-gaza/ | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://web.archive.org/web/20200407104742/https://www.soc.ucsb.edu/faculty/lisa-hajjar | Faculty page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://poli.ucalgary.ca/profiles/tareq-ismael | Faculty page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/michael-smith-uae-prison-mps-b1813663.html | Significant coverage of a letter organized by the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://exeter.academia.edu/TanyaNewburySmith | academia.edu page for a member of the Euro-Med HRM Board of Trustees | ? | No mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/authors/3/Maha-Hussaini | About-self | ? | Maybe SIGCOV of Maha Hussaini, not sigcov of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/author/maha-hussaini/ | Author page for a Euro-Med HRM reporter | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/maha-hussaini-martin-adler-prize-win-rory-peck-trust | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.una-oic.org/page/public/news_details.aspx?id=328294&NL=True | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of an official complaint from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/ngo914.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Libya | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2021/ngo923.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2021/ngo927.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ngo942.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo950.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo953.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2023/ngo959.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Bahrain | ✘ No | |
https://press.un.org/en/2022/ngo933.doc.htm | UN press release about the UN granting Consultative Status to several NGO's | Single sentence of coverage about an objection from Israel | ✘ No | |
https://kvinnatillkvinna.org/about-us/where-we-work/mena/palestine/ | Funded (?) a Euro-Med HRM Project | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2017/08/palestine-gaza-civil-society-women-leadership-incubator.html | ? | Significant coverage of Women's Leadership Incubator project, passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.launchgood.com/campaign/from_denial_to_defense_youth_for_rights#!/ | A "go fund me" equivilent for a Euro-Med HRM project | Significant coverage of the project, not of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
http://www.ju.edu.jo/Lists/NewsLetter/Disp_f.aspx?ID=1175&Issue=August%202016&order=8 | UJ Newsletter about a summer school hosted at UJ | ? | Passing mention of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://thepoliticain.co.uk/middle-east/201/ | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a summer school set up by Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.bnreport.com/en/wikirights-2/ | ? | Significant coverage of a program by Euro-Med HRM to edit Wikipedia, no significant coverage of the Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://law.ju.edu.jo/Lists/AcademicNews/Test.aspx?ID=78&ContentTypeId=0x0100FB3DD40023178C409CDBAC99DB39D980 | Copy of source 36, this time hosted on UJ's sharepoint | ? | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20211003105920/https://europebriefnews.com/2017/10/25/watering-the-seeds/ | Not discussed at RSN, but I'm convinced that it is not a reliable source. The source is obscure and now defunct, and its "about me" page only said "Europe Brief News (EBN) provides our readers with latest news from across Europe such as news, stories, politics, tourism, travel, food, health diet and many more topics" which does not indicate any level of editorial control or reliability. The specific article also raises questions; it is labeled as "news", but it is reads as an opinion piece. Note that there is a current organization using the name Europe Brief News that does appear reliable, but they are not the same entity - the current one was founded in 2020. |
? It could arguably contain WP:SIGCOV, but I'm not convinced; it uses a lot of words but says very little about Euro-Med HRM, and WP:NCORP requires that the coverage is sufficient to "makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization". However, this is a lesser issue than the reliability of the source. | ✘ No | |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/3190 | About-self | ? | Significant coverage of a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/11/career-assassination-dws-scapegoating-of-arab-employees | Passing mention of a press release from Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.nonviolenceinternational.net/many_faces_wann | Appears written by We Are Not Numbers | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://www.middleeasteye.net/features/deported-israels-war-against-palestine-solidarity-activists | Written by the secretary of Euro-Med HRM | ? | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/128695 | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
We Are Not Numbers: Junge Stimmen aus Gaza | A book written by We Are Not Numbers | ? | ? | ✘ No |
http://mondoweiss.net/2016/07/struggles-triumphs-palestinian/ | ? | Significant coverage of We are Not Numbers, a project launched by Euro-Med HRM, but not of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20160824141709/http://www.daysofpalestine.com/news/israel-bans-right-activist-entering-gaza/ | ? | Single sentence of coverage of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.972mag.com/gaza-fence-stories-hebrew/ | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/5/german-court-rules-palestinian-ex-dw-journalist-sacking-unlawful | Passing mention of a Euro-Med HRM investigation | ✘ No | ||
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/5039/Euro-Med-Monitor%27s-We-Are-Not-Numbers-project-celebrates-graduation-of-new-batch-of-writers | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/5562/Euro-Med-Monitor%E2%80%99s-project-We-Are-Not-Numbers-launches-17th-cohort-of-writers | About-self | ? | ✘ No | |
https://news.trust.org/item/20210902130009-tk186/ | ? | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM; syndicated from a Reuters article which is used seperately as a reference | ✘ No | |
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/they-told-us-they-hate-africans-hundreds-detained-deported-abu-dhabi-2021-09-02/ | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/tori-58446660 | Two quotes from Euro-Med HRM. Appears to be identical to the two reuters and truth.org sources linked above, except translated into Pidgin | ✘ No | ||
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1437749/saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuse-minister-disappeared | ~ Most of the coverage related to Euro-Med HRM consists of quotes | WP:DAILYEXPRESS | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/risks-refugees-disabilities-face-turkey-how-mitigate-risks-and-challenges-shape-apt | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
https://europebriefnews.com/2017/12/09/euro-med-monitor/ | ? See earlier discussion of Europe Brief New's reliability | Significant coverage of a report from the Euro-Med HRM, but not of the Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/world/middleeast/fleeing-gaza-only-to-face-treachery-and-disaster-at-sea-.html | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1437749/saudi-arabia-human-rights-abuse-minister-disappeared | WP:DAILYEXPRESS | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | |
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jordan-arrests-hundreds-of-teachers-after-violent-clashes-zzg7ppsvh | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/gaza-war-survivor-commemorates-victims-paintings-2022-05-26/ | Passing mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No | ||
https://palestine.unwomen.org/en/stories/feature-story/2022/05/zainab-al-qolaq-a-survivor-of-an-israeli-airstrike-on-gaza-in-may-2021-tells-her-story | ? | ? | No mention of Euro-Med HRM | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.As an aside, while Common Dreams is not at RSP, discussions at RSN lean towards it being unreliable.
The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, a Geneva-based Human Rights NGO, reported that the law legitimized censorship and restricted freedom of expression (Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 2020).Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization.
PA Security also commonly targets opposition. The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor documented 1,274 arbitrary detentions in the West Bank in 2015 and 1,089 summonses by Palestinian Security Services. The human rights violations targeted mostly individuals affiliated with Hamas or who opposed PA policies, including about 35 journalists and human rights activists, 476 university students, and 67 teachers/professors (Euro-Med 2016).Again, not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. BilledMammal ( talk) 14:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Advocate for the human rights of all persons across Europe and the MENA region, particularly those who live under occupation, in the throes of war or political unrest and/or have been displaced due to persecution or armed conflict.Further, they normally provide
a profile in the words of the organization itself. The coverage is neither significant nor independent.
describ[ing] only a specific topic related to an organization. A report is not a "topic." Brusquedandelion ( talk) 02:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization.BilledMammal ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Updated BilledMammal ( talk) 18:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor does not publish any financial date on its website, reflecting a complete lack of transparency and accountabilityand
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor (Euro-Med Monitor) consistently spreads blood libels and conspiracy theories about Israel, and accuses Israel of “apartheid,” genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” “collective punishment,” and “war crimes.”The rest is limited to quotes from Euro-Med and affiliated individuals and thus doesn't contribute to WP:SIGCOV as the quotes aren't independent coverage.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
ample references to it | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? A link to Google Scholar search results. No specific source provided. | ? Unknown |
this paper published in the Lancet | Authors include the founder and chairman of Euro-Med HRM | Coverage is limited to detailing Euro-Med HRM's activities in preparing the report: "The field researchers of Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor covered 338 (64%) of the total 530 children killed. They focused extensively on mass attacks because it was difficult to cover hundreds of attacks taking place at the same time for 50 days." No WP:SIGCOV of the Euro-Med HRM itself. | ✘ No | |
UNRWA published press releases 1 | Republished press release from Euro-Med HRM | ? | Coverage of a primary report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
UNRWA published press releases 2 | Republished press release from Euro-Med HRM | ? | Coverage of a statement from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No |
Their reports are routinely picked up by RS | Coverage of a call from Euro-Med HRM to free a Tunisian prisoner; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
) Watchdog Submits Evidence of Israeli Executions of Gaza Civilians to UN, ICC in Common Dreams | ~ While Common Dreams is not at RSP, discussions at RSN lean towards it being unreliable | Coverage of a report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | |
Rights at Stake and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Two Special Issues of the Journal of Human Rights Scholarly Citation. | Coverage is "The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, a Geneva-based Human Rights NGO, reported that the law legitimized censorship and restricted freedom of expression (Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor 2020)." Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. | ✘ No | ||
National and International Civilian Protection Strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Schoarly Citation. | Coverage is "PA Security also commonly targets opposition. The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor documented 1,274 arbitrary detentions in the West Bank in 2015 and 1,089 summonses by Palestinian Security Services. The human rights violations targeted mostly individuals affiliated with Hamas or who opposed PA policies, including about 35 journalists and human rights activists, 476 university students, and 67 teachers/professors (Euro-Med 2016)." Not even SIGCOV of their report, let alone SIGCOV of the organization. | ✘ No | ||
Israel 'stealing organs' from bodies in Gaza, alleges human rights group | Coverage of an allegation from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
Allegations of Organ Theft by Israel Add Insult to Injury in Gaza | Coverage of a report from Euro-Med HRM; no significant coverage of Euro-Med HRM itself | ✘ No | ||
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/euro-mediterranean-human-rights-monitor | ? | WP:CRUNCHBASE; source is deprecated | ? | ✘ No |
https://www.lobbyfacts.eu/datacard/euro-med-human-rights-monitor?rid=326186932081-66&sid=142920 | Mirrors other sources, which lack independence. For example, the significant coverage comes directly from the Euro-Med HRM's website, and other coverage comes from the EU transparency register, which is populated by submissions from the organization | ? | ✘ No | |
https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122281718 | They normally provide "a profile in the words of the organization itself" | ? | Only one sentence of coverage; "Advocate for the human rights of all persons across Europe and the MENA region, particularly those who live under occupation, in the throes of war or political unrest and/or have been displaced due to persecution or armed conflict." | ✘ No |
3 by Richard A. Falk | Richard A. Falk is the chairman of Euro-Med HRM's Board of Directors | ? | ✘ No | |
4 by Reliefweb | Republication of a Euro-Med HRM press release | ? | ✘ No | |
5 by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency | Coverage is of EuroMed Rights, not Euro-Med HRM - different organization, with a very similar name. | ✘ No | ||
NGO Monitor's article 6 | Editor who presented the source has !voted for it to be deprecated | Two sentences of coverage containing highly contentious claims. The closest we have to WP:SIGCOV, but not good enough - particularily given how the source is about to be found unreliable at RSN. | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Independence of the content (or intellectual independence): the content must not be produced by interested parties. Often a related party produces a narrative that is then copied, regurgitated, and published in whole or in part by independent parties (as exemplified by churnalism). Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject.
The information in the Register is provided by the registrants themselves, on the understanding that they are ultimately responsible for its accuracy. The Secretariat monitors the quality of the Register’s content and reserves the right to de-register ineligible registrants, including those found not to observe the code of conduct.Their disclaimer says information is
not necessarily comprehensive, complete, accurate or up to date.
As stated on its website, information on the official EU Register is provided by registrants themselves, making it the sole responsibility of those organisations. It is recognised that some entries in the official register are inaccurate, incomplete or otherwise misleading.Based on this information, the EU Transparency Register and those relying on them are not reliable sources because the register does not have reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. S0091 ( talk) 16:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Base articles on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.BilledMammal ( talk) 13:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:41, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm not seeing significant coverage of the organization
Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor’s leadership routinely posts antisemitic and pro-Hamas content onlineas being
coverage of a specific topic related to the organization? And what topic might that be, may I ask?
The Geneva-based human rights group has been at the forefront of exposing Israel’s crimes against humanity committed in occupied Palestinian territories
Israeli institutions... have attempted to spoil Euro-Med’s standing
I suspect that the editors arguing to keep this article would also reject the UN Watch article.
notoriously biased and antisemitic, and
routinely posts antisemitic and pro-Hamas content online. That isn't significant coverage of the organization.
There is consensus that an article should not exist at this title. There are several conflicting suggestions as to where to merge or redirect to. I would consider "no consensus", resulting in an effective keep of the article which nobody seems to favour, to be a poor option. I have therefore slightly arbitrarily decided the closure should be to redirect to Freedom Township, Ellis County, Kansas as it seems to have slightly more support than others, but nothing should be taken as preventing editors from retargeting if it transpires that there's a better choice, nor from merging any content they may wish to merge. Stifle ( talk) 09:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
A blatant example of a 4th class post office not being a town, as it geolocates onto a farm that is still there. And no, redirecting to Pfeifer, Kansas is a bad idea as they are not the same place. Mangoe ( talk) 05:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 08:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Back in the 1980s, this database was available on magnetic tape and was even printed out on paper, bound, and sold in book form. Ironically, Google then digitized the books, so it's possible to find out what the feature classes, which were squashed a few years ago, used to be years ago. This has confused several people in past AFD discussions who don't realize that what's available on a WWW site was once available as this "National Gazetteer of the United States", being exactly the same thing and exactly as bogus, before the World Wide Web was invented, because the GNIS was invented in the 1970s.
Things to remind yourself about the reliability of GNIS data: It's a government computer database that is an index to where words occur(ed) on government maps, mostly maps as they were in the 1980s. Like other government projects it was ambitious but was de-funded before the all-important fixing-the-errors-from-state-sources phase of the original plan kicked in. The "historical" records were dropped from the database tables quite a while ago. More recently, all of the feature classes, which used to make distinctions amongst cemeteries, locales, populated places, flats, tanks, summits, gaps, and so forth, were largely squashed.
For an article that explains the rural post offices, see the one that I cited in Bulloch County, Georgia#Further reading a couple of days ago. It does a fair job of explaining, with that county as a case study, how actual history happened, and thus why a lot of this "ghost town" and "unincorporated community" synthesis that people do, in desperation at trying to flesh out crap from the GNIS, is utter tripe. Rennick has documented an entire state full of examples of how post offices moved around with people's private homes and stores that they were run from.
Schools were the same, and there was no rule that school districts were coterminous with post office service areas. Adding them together to make places is synthesis, just as the still fake ghost-townery of Monroe, Kansas ( AfD discussion) is. This is "settled" land, but these were and are rural places without population centres. "At Monroe" is how the mail is delivered and (when it's a store) the general store supplies are shipped.
And in several of the midwestern states the "communities" were the (civil, not survey) Townships. (In Rennick's state they were the Creeks.) The Townships were the legally recognized populated places, for people wanting that rule, with census figures and legal authority. The Fifth Biennial Report of the Kansas State Board of Agriculture doesn't give a population figure for Easdale post office, because the post offices aren't the legally recognized populated places despite what the desperate Wikipedia synthesizers and false ghost-townery writers think; nor does it give populations for the 44 school districts that it mentions; but it does say that 451 people lived in Wheatland Township in 1885, which you wouldn't know from our every-article-in-Kansas-is-the-same crappy boilerplate article on the place.
Equally as sad as the Monroe ghost-townery synthesis is the fact that if Kansas editors had been any good at this then rather than a bland sweep of boilerplate across loads of Kansas articles we would have for years now known a lot more about the Germans from the Ellis County, Kansas#History article, and it wouldn't be lopsidedly placed in Pfeifer, Kansas (because, for starters, they didn't just settle in Pfeifer), and we'd even know a tiny bit about Hog Back, Kansas ( AfD discussion) and why it's not a settlement (the German settlers choosing not to settle it), because it's all in Francis S. Laing's history of the German-Russian Settlements in Ellis County, Kansas.
Comments: Not a town, sure, but a known community in the papers 1880 to 1904. Several mentions of meetings at the Easdale school house, mostly a hotbed of Socialists ... (so they called my Republican grandad).
To be fair, I never knew of Easdale until this week, but then, I had never been in Pfeifer until last April. The first election I remember was Dad taking me with him when he voted at one of the sister schools to Easdale. I make no claim of notabilty, but I acknowledge the community of that time. IveGoneAway ( talk) 05:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to discuss potential Merge targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 22:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article about a film award, not
properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for events. As always, awards are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass
WP:GNG and
WP:ORGDEPTH on third-party media coverage about them -- analysis about their impact, evidence that the media consider the award to be significant enough to cover the presentation as news, etc. -- but apart from one media hit (which isn't enough by itself) this is otherwise referenced entirely to a
reference-bombed cluster of 248
primary sources, mostly its own self-published website about itself but occasionally streaming copies of the films on YouTube or Vimeo, none of which are valid support for notability at all.
Simply existing isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from having to have proper GNG-worthy coverage about it in real media independent of its own self-created web presence.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 23:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Reywas92 Talk 22:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ellis County, Kansas. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
A Union Pacific passing siding/station, not a town: even the only real source in the article says so. Mangoe ( talk) 05:40, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Reference (2) in the article appears to originate from page 480 of the Collections of the Kansas State Historical Society [34], where it states that Hog Back is "now Yocemento." Jbt89 ( talk) 18:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Uncle G ( talk) 19:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)In 1906, I. M. Yost and Professor Erasmus Haworth met in Hays and decided to build a cement plant at the hogback.
— Cable, Ted T.; Maley, Wayne (2017). Driving across Kansas: A Guide to I-70. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 9780700624140., p.85
References
[picture of] Harvey and Lyle Luce at the elevator their father operated at Hog Back.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
PhantomSteve/
talk¦
contribs\ 08:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 21:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability not established with substantive sources, only a context-free database entry with the dates of appointment. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reywas92 Talk 21:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nea Salamis Famagusta FC#Women's football. as an ATD Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a Cypriot women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions ( 2011, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2021, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 20:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 00:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Checking for reliable sources, I only find https://www2.northwestmuseum.org/museum/participant-fitch-alice-underwood-3477.htm. If that biography precedes the Wikipedia article then the Wikipedia article is a clear copyright violation. If the Wikipedia article precedes the posted biography at the Northwest Museum of Arts and Culture, then using it as a source would be circular. I am not finding much else in WP:BEFORE to bring this up to wiki standards. Bringing it to the group for consideration. -- WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 22:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 01:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Wordsmith
Talk to me 20:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Obscure single with no elaboration or sources, should redirect to the song "Late" on Late Registration. As it exists, the article has no reason to exist. Same logic applies to Fade (Blue Angel song) and I Had a Love. -1ctinus📝 🗨 20:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Others on the talk page raised concerns about the credibility/validity of this article about 10 years ago [38].
Although I attempted to revamp the lead, it became extremely clear to me that this article's sources are only primary sources, and that this entire piece seems extremely self-promoation. In order for this to be possibly made into a credible/balanced wikipedia article a lot of work is needed, and that assumes that it even warrents a page. As far as I can tell, this is not a commonly used measure. (And I say that as someone who teaches classes about personality psychology and psychological testing.) Mason ( talk) 20:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this meets WP:NPOL, she didn't win the republican primary and it looks like there's mostly just normal campaign coverage about her. BuySomeApples ( talk) 19:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 23:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:NFILM. Trailer and teaser were released in summer 2022, along with routine WP:NEWSORGINDIA coverage that the film was being made, but I can't find a single mention of it online since then in English or Malayalam (e വലയം), let alone a release date. WP:SPA article creator is an associate director of the film, and has declared at his user talk page that he's here to promote himself and his work. See also WP:Articles for deletion/Sreejith Mohandas. WP:TOOSOON at best. Wikishovel ( talk) 19:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
It has been suspected to be a hoax article. Although there is some coverage from some analog sources that mention a person of that name from the 17th Century, I thoroughly checked and the in-line sources listed fail verification of the claimed statements. I looked the subject up via Wikipedia Library for further sources and was unable to find any organized and detailed coverage of the subject. I don't see how it qualifies for an article (and there's dubious sourcing with failed verification spreading misinformation). X ( talk) 19:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Thanks to the research and work on the article Star Mississippi 04:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It's not clear that this promotional program is notable - the majority of sources in the article point to the program's own website. The article was created by a single purpose account banned for sockpuppetry who has ties to DISCUS, the organization that created this program.
There was discussion on the article's Talk page back in 2008 suggesting that the article should be deleted, but it was never nominated. Martey ( talk) 19:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The article notes: "So when the opportunity arose to travel to President George Washington's Mount Vernon estate, the starting point of the American Whiskey Trail (www.americanwhiskeytrail.com) ... The linking together of seven distilleries and half a dozen historical sites is in large part the brainchild of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS) ... It was a good note to end on, as my mind was already down river heading toward the second stop of the Whiskey Trail--Kentucky. ... My stops along this stretch of the American Whiskey Trail included four of Kentucky's finest: Jim Beam, Maker's Mark, Wild Turkey, and Woodford Reserve -- distilleries as unique to one another as the closely guarded yeast strains they use in their whiskey-making processes."
The article notes: "Aficionados and novices alike can avail themselves of this experience by visiting any or all the seven distilleries that are part of the American Whiskey Trail. Sponsored by the Distilled Spirits Council of the U.S., or DISCUS, the trail is spread over a five-state area from New York to Tennessee by way of Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. I recently traversed about 1,000 miles, often on twisting, narrow rural roads and byways, to hit the distilleries in a four-day span before taking in Mount Vernon, Va. ... The distilleries open to the public are in Kentucky (Jim Beam in Clermont; Maker's Mark in Loretto; Wild Turkey in Lawrenceburg; and Woodford Reserve in Versailles) and Tennessee (George Dickel in Tullahoma and Jack Daniel's in Lynchburg). ... Trying to sum up the allure of the American Whiskey Trail in a sentence is difficult. I ran into any number of nondrinkers who were visiting just out of curiosity about the culture of whiskey-making - a process often carried out in "dry" counties where liquor cannot be sold."
The book notes: "Nearly four thousand miles away in the New World, there is another historic trail-the American Whiskey Trail, which includes seven historic sites and six operating whiskey distilleries spread over a five-state arc between New York and Tennessee by way of Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Kentucky. If that seems a slightly awkward physical construct, perhaps it is. But it shows the erratic progression of whiskey-making throughout America history, the watershed moment of which occurred before George Smith's rise to prominence. Traveling from the north, the American Whiskey Trail begins at historic Fraunces Tavern Museum in Manhattan. It was the site of General George Washington's farewell address to his troops in 1783 and operates as a commercial business to this day. The trail ends at the recently rebuilt site of the George Washington Distillery Museum on the grounds of private citizen Washington's home and farm at Mount Vernon, Virginia. There they refer to that site as the gateway to the trail. Geographic chauvinism obviously is dictated by where you live. In between, visitors take in a string of historic taverns, whiskey museums, and distillery centers. One of them is in the West Overton Museums complex in Scottdale, Pennsylvania, a former distillery center and part of what is billed as the only pre-Civil War village in Pennsylvania still intact. Its heritage links the Old World and the New."
The book notes: "The American Whiskey Trail, a list of whiskey-related sites collected by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, is a visible history of America's romance with distilled spirits. Some of the sites primarily associated with Bourbon and Tennessee whiskeys are listed in Chapter 6. The following list shows the locations associated primarily with American blended whiskey. Put the two together and you have one wonderful trip."
The book lists Gadsby's Tavern Museum, George Washington's Distillery, Oliver Miller Homestead, Oscar Getz Museum of Whisky, West Overton Museums, and Woodsville Plantation.
The book notes: "Once you have traveled the Kentucky Bourbon Trail, if you want to continue your “studies" on bourbon and American whiskey, you might consider a journey on the American Whiskey Trail. You can begin the trail wherever you like, but note that the George Washington Distillery in Mount Vernon, Virginia, is considered the “gateway” to the trail. There is some overlap between the Kentucky Bourbon Trail and the American Whiskey Trail, so you can decide to either revisit some locations or move on to those that you have not seen yet. Allegany Museum—Cumberland, Maryland. Angel's Envy—Louisville, Kentucky. Barton 1792 Distillery—Bardstown, Kentucky. Bradford House Museum—Washington, Pennsylvania. Buffalo Trace—Frankfort, Kentucky."
The book notes: "In 2004, the Distilled Spirits Council launched the American Whiskey Trail tourism initiative to celebrate the cultural heritage and history of spirits, such as moonshine, in America. The American Whiskey Trail includes museums, such as the Allegheny Museum in Cumberland, Maryland; Oscar Getz Museum of Whiskey History in Bardstown, Kentucky; and Whiskey Rebellion sites such as Oliver Miller Homestead in South Park, Pennsylvania, and Woodville Plantation, the John and Presley Neville House in Bridgeville, Pennsylvania. Distilleries are also part of the American Whiskey Trail. These include icons like Jack Daniel's in Lynchburg, Tennessee; Jim Beam in Clermont, Kentucky; Maker's Mark in Loretto, Kentucky; and Wild Turkey in Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. Also included are George Washington's Distillery at Historic Mount Vernon in Alexandria, Virginia; George Dickel in Tullahoma, Tennessee; Stitzel-Weller Distillery in Louisville, Kentucky; and Woodford Reserve in Versailles, Kentucky."
The article notes: "To tell the story, the Distilled Spirits Council mapped a route it calls the American Whiskey Trail that runs in an arc from Washington, D.C., through Pennsylvania and Kentucky into Tennessee, and Dominic and I and a few other passionate whiskey-philes set out to follow it. The trail officially starts in Mount Vernon, Virginia, the home of America’s first president. ... the master distiller at George Dickel Whisky in Tullahoma, Tennessee, where we pick up the trail."
The article notes: "The American Whiskey Trail is pinging the radar of whiskey-loving tourists. ... Despite being distilled in the Appalachian foothills for centuries, the idea of a formal “trail” is a relatively new concept. The “American Whiskey Trail” only dates back to 2004, when the Distilled Spirits Council recognised the growing interest and realised there was a need for a more organised visitor experience. The trail is not a linear route, rather it snakes around points of interest, such as historic bars, museums, coopers, and still-makers. The distilleries remain the real focus, however. These five are the most interesting distilleries I visited on the trail, though I should also give a mention to cooperages such as Brown-Forman and still-maker Vendome Copper & Brass, both in Louisville."
The article notes: "The chief historian at Mount Vernon, the first president's Potomac-side mansion, disclosed plans Tuesday for the George Washington Distillery Museum, which will be become the gateway for a new American Whiskey Trail. The trail is meant to be enjoyed much like the spirit: slowly, as it will feature museums and historic sites in five states. ... The trail goes from the Fraunces Tavern Museum in New York City, where Washington bade farewell to his troops in 1783, through several museums and plantations in Pennsylvania. It includes distilleries in Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky. ... Distillers and historians toasted Tuesday's opening of the trail with a historic rye whiskey, the first made on the grounds of Mount Vernon since Washington's distillery closed in 1797. "
The article notes: "This is where our education on the drink that nursed a newborn nation begins, in the heart of the Bluegrass State, home to five stops on the American Whiskey Trail. Sponsored by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, the trail consists of more than a dozen public distillery tours, museums and cultural sites across five states. Most are within easy striking distance for troops stationed on the East Coast. Some of the more popular stops on the trail, begun in 2004 to showcase the long-standing distilling tradition in the U.S., draw more than 50,000 visitors each year. ... There is no real batting order for the American Whiskey Trail. Like baseball fans hoping to visit every major league city or hikers who set out to conquer the national parks, whiskey aficionados can start wherever they see fit."
The article notes: "The industry doesn't just rely on consumption, but tourism, something I recently witnessed first-hand while following the "American Whiskey Trail" on a press trip organized by the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States. Admirers of Tennessee whisky or Kentucky bourbon can easily spend a week touring grand ol' distilleries like those of Jack Daniel's, Maker's Mark and Jim Beam.If the Whiskey Trail has a Disney World, it's Jack Daniel's sprawling distillery in Lynchburg, Tenn., which welcomes more than 250,000 tourists each year ... When you get past its quaint facade, the sheer scale of the 1,800-acre distillery becomes apparent; behind the old-timey buildings, folksy tour guides and magic cave spring (Whiskey Trail pilgrims soon learn that each distillery claims water superiority over the competition) ..."
There is enough information in the sources I found to support a standalone article that discusses each stop of the American Whiskey Trail. A merge to Distilled Spirits Council of the United States would lead to the loss of sourced content or be undue weight if everything is merged. Cunard ( talk) 10:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
a standalone article that discusses each stop of the American Whiskey Trailwould be encyclopedic. Per WP:N, an article needs to both meet GNG and WP:NOT. In this case, Wikipedia is not a travel guide, particularly where many of the sources you've cited are 5+ years old and some of the distilleries and other locations on the tour have very likely changed since those reviews were written. An article noting that the trail exists and describing each stop on the trail would quickly go out of date and would not be useful to readers. I think a redirect to DISCUS, perhaps merging a list of the current locations of the trial and citing to more recent reviews, would be appropriate. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 21:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Article is mostly promo added by IPs. Barely any encyclopedic content would remain if promo is removed. No sources found on this guy besides social media, IMDB, and self-published stuff. Catalyzzt ( talk) 19:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This place does not seem to exist. The map points to a place called Arabic: شياء, romanized: šyā and I can't find any place with a similar spelling on CityPopulation which has a complete database for Oman sourced from the Omani institute of statistics. Broc ( talk) 18:58, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to confirm it meets WP:N or a good WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 18:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I helped discover that the subject is probably running a sockpuppet farm; regardless, he’s a relentless self-promoter, but the claims to notability are decidedly slender. Most of the sourcing is more or less directly connected to him, which doesn’t encourage a finding of notability. — Biruitorul Talk 18:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. List on a random topic and a random geographic region with a random amount of elements (19). Are there reliable sources discussing the amount of airports in the Balkans or something like that that could show this article to be necessary? Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 18:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
the borders of the Balkans are, due to many contrasting definitions, disputed. As such, the inclusion criteria are not clear, which contravenes WP:LISTCRIT. Likewise,
one accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. I do not see evidence that airports specifically in the Balkans (regardless of the definition of the region) are a group that are discussed collectively in sources. -- Kinu t/ c 23:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBLP; some refs are WP:BLPSPS (instagram, linkedin) and most others only mention the subject in passing; possibly written by the subject ( WP:COI), etc. As written, this appears to be essentially a self-published CV. That said, the subject – who is a medical school student – sounds like a very serious and dedicated person who may well go on to accomplish great things that will lead to ample sources that could establish future WP:GNG. Cl3phact0 ( talk) 18:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 04:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that it meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. It's been suggested that there may be more coverage coming soon, but for now it's a delete. WP:REFUND is the place to go to get the article restored to draft when you're ready. Stifle ( talk) 09:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Since that removal, one more source has been added, but it's a mostly primary-source interview. Personally, I still don't see notability, and I don't think having her byline appear frequently on Wikipedia would be enough to get her there. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 16:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)I can find plenty of Rolling Stone bylines from Spanos, and she is a writer I'm familiar with (I even follow her on Twitter), but I don't see any reliable coverage that indicates major notability. Of the sources here, two are bios from her employers, and the third is WP:FORBESCON, and I couldn't find anything else.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Soft delete contested by recreation without improvement. Still [f]ails NLIST, CLN and NOTTVGUIDE. A massive unsourced programming guide, very very few wls, no CLN value, no sources showing this meets NLIST. Nothing sourced to merge, no proper redirect target
* Pppery *
it has begun... 16:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This topic lacks notability in academia. The article is essentially based on two references, ref1: "Optimal scheduling in film production to minimize talent hold cost" ( Cited by 52), ref2 "Iterative local search methods for the talent scheduling problem" (Cited by 7). Both references are lacking citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 桃花影落飞神剑 ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Been on the CAT:NN list for 10+ years and never been referenced correctly. Seems to be non-notable. Unable to identify anything about them. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 16:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
An accountant doing his job, hardly anything of note, fails WP:GNG. HistoriesUnveiler ( talk) 15:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Keith J. Krach as a viable ATD. While there is not currently consensus to merge, the history remains should that eventuate. Star Mississippi 04:03, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE. Previously soft-deleted, recreation was requested by the same editor, who has stated on their user page that their sole goal here on Wikipedia is to write an article on this topic, and has made no further improvements since restoration to the state of the last AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 15:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I don't understand why the deletion of this page is so important. I believe all the people here are well versed in Wikipedia and they can fix the page to help the readers and the Wikipedia community. I created this page to help people I don't know why its being portrayed like I committed some type of sin. I only tried to create a full informative page and why would I promote anything and what benefit I can get from it? I read and researched extensively about Wikipedia guidelines and tutorials then finalized the content, so I guess you can help by editing the page because I know it contains a lot of reliable sources and the subject is notable not sure why its being denied as something that is not notable, I feel maybe de to political aspect or I'm not sure. TBH I'm pretty disappointed at the moment.... Not a single person is interested in editing the page and fixing it to the level they think is fine... Anyway, I respect opinions and I won't mind the outcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tickingtime ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
And I read WP:ORGRITE the primary criteria already verifies its notability but I'll leave it maybe I'm knocking at the wrong door. Tickingtime ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 14:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 15:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage about the company. Sources are all either covering routine business transactions or are primary. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I won't vote without a BEFORE search, but I'm entirely unconvinced any of the sources in article are sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH Mach61 ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Provincial Court of Manitoba. ✗ plicit 00:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
BLP, Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article and BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing. Ping me if sources are added to article that meet WP:SIGCOV and are not routine mill news. // Timothy :: talk 05:58, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No argument for deletion has been advanced except the nominating editor's. A merge can be proposed and discussed on the relevant talk page outside of AfD. (non-admin closure) IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 03:32, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Article has been around for a long time. Footballer who perished before making his debut for a big club, brings WP:ONEEVENT and WP:NOTMEMORIAL into question. Despite there being a significant coverage cited in the article already, it doesn't necessarily mean that the subject should have its own article. A more natural place to discuss the subject would be at 1994–95 Liverpool F.C. season. Geschichte ( talk) 14:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be a successful model but I couldn't find enough sources to verify she meets WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 13:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG criteria. The club has never played in a professional Czech competition (top two tiers) and only briefly appeared in the 3rd tier in 2010–11. FromCzech ( talk) 13:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus established for GNG and SIGCOV. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NORG criteria. The club has never played in a professional Czech competition (top two tiers), not even in the 3rd tier. FromCzech ( talk) 13:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article likely suffers from major WP:OR (only linked sources are someone's genealogy page, other sources are hard to verify). The subject does not appear notable (the article is just a list of family relations, and in fact 90% of it seems to be about other people - her relatives). See related ongoing AfDs on articles created by the same author: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Skopovny, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubikowski family with Ostoja coat of arms. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The article has been pointed out as a possible hoax filled with misinformation. You can see the talk page. I couldn't find reliable coverage of the actual subject of the article without the ones copied from this article in mirror sites. The article's sources showcase that Google has a patent, but there's no proof or coverage where it establishes that it got developed. X ( talk) 12:35, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:NALBUM. Has been lacking any sources since 2019. I have searched and can’t find any reliable independent secondary sources required to establish notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 12:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment - the article has been through the AfD process several times before - the result was Delete, however in both cases the article was re-created without addressing the issue of its lack of references. Given the article is about a 2008 album, if there are no sources for it now it is highly unlikely that there will ever be adequate sources and as such if at the conclusion of this AfD it is decided to delete there may be grounds to WP:SALT as well. Dan arndt ( talk) 01:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
She doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 11:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 13:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Ambiguous title, so redirect anywhere could be misleading. Non-notable author. Boleyn ( talk) 10:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:MUSICBIO. All I can find in an online search in English is about the same as the current sources: a mix of interviews (WP:PRIMARY) in RS like Daily Trust, Daily Nigerian and Nigerian Tribune, and puff pieces on music blogs. The RS also pretty consistently describe her as "upcoming", "budding", etc. She's put out a single EP, with no charts in evidence, the sources cited for regular radio rotation are music blogs, and the station named isn't national per WP:MUSICBIO #11. Wikishovel ( talk) 09:06, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This article also raises concerns regarding its notability. Despite thorough research, I was unable to locate reliable sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, as stipulated by the guidelines outlined in WP:SIGCOV. Furthermore, the article fails to meet the mandatory requirement of WP:NSOFT. This policy ensures that articles of this nature adhere to specific criteria. Barseghian Lilia ( talk) 10:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 10:52, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Clear example of WP:COATRACK. Not notable except for WP:ONEEVENT which includes her sole published book No Turning Back and telemovie both about the event. No longer a suspect either since 2005 conviction of Murdoch. She is famous so has lots of coverage in reliable sources but this is not the same as being notable in her own right. This event has separate articles about Murder of Peter Falconio and Bradley John Murdoch who are the main victim and perpetrator respectively. Darrelljon ( talk) 10:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
The TV program exits, but there is not a single independent source to consider it as a notable program. For those wishing to check in native language, use the translated title :"आफ्नो नेपाल आफ्नो गौरव" nirmal ( talk) 10:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even if we assume that WP:NJOURNALS, while being a non-binding essay, is currently our best-practice on the topic, the Keep views have still failed to establish how the article meets NJOURNALS (other than the sweeping Criterion 1.b, which failed to reach consensus), and have not adequately refuted the claims it fails even under these overly permissive criteria. Kudos to Ritchie333 for the final relist, which allowed participants another week to address the GNG and NJOURNALS concerns. This discussion is also echoed in a similar AfD - WP:Articles for deletion/European Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Owen× ☎ 00:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
It exists, but I couldn't find the sources to show it is notable. I may be missing something though from not reading Arabic. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can get this resolved. Boleyn ( talk) 20:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:NJOURNALS is not a notability guideline, and does not address nominator's implicit
WP:DEL-REASON#8 rationale. More discussion around established
policies and guidelines would be helpful in determining notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 18:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 15:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I closed this as "no consensus", but was challenged, so I am relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 10:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Moving to draft per consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 04:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Ranges from press releases, "community contributor"s, and other non- WP:INDEPENDENT sources. Aside from possible WP:UPE, idependent/reliable sources here only mention Bill Hutchens per WP:ROUTINE. TLA (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk) 03:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NBOOK Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them.See also MOS:WAF. The notability of the franchise is a red herring, as it has no bearing on whether this topic should have a stand-alone article. TompaDompa ( talk) 06:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
“ | Other paratexts followed, including the 1999 release of Sunnydale High Yearbook, co-authored by tie-in phenoms Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. The Yearbook is designed with verisimilitude in mind, as if it is an actual high school yearbook—complete with “signatures” on the inside front and back covers, “handwritten” notes throughout, and descriptions of school events from the show’s diegesis such as Halloween, the Talent Show, the Sadie Hawkins Dance, and the Spring Fling, accompanied, of course, with pictures from the corresponding episodes as if they had been taken by the yearbook committee. Transmedial by nature, both of these kinds of paratexts suggest a life for the show beyond its televisual borders. Obviously, BtVS did not invent these kind of paratexts; other shows such as Twin Peaks and The X-Files had companion books and guides, too, but situated temporally as it was within the nascent phenomenon of online fandom, the paratextual BtVS experience was highly influential in how later shows—particularly those aimed at the 18–35 demographic—were wooed through such cultural products. | ” |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The book notes: "Golden, Christopher, and Nancy Holder. Sunnydale High Yearbook. New York: Simon, 1999. Print. 112p. A fully realized fake yearbook for the Sunnydale High graduating class of '99, many of whom survived the graduation ceremony and went on to future careers. There are reports on Homecoming, including runners-up Cordelia Chase and Buffy Summers, Homecoming fashion perspectives from Harmony Kendall, and reports from the chess, computer, dance, and drama clubs. There are updates on prime student hangouts around Sunnydale, including The Bronze, the Zoo, Putters' Green, the Mall, and the Sun Cinema. The swim team had an unfortunate year, with the coach and several members mysteriously missing. The "In Memoriam” section at the back is inevitably rather long, and includes Herbert the Pig, school mascot. On the bright side, the school had the lowest annual mortality rate in recent history."
The review notes: "Ultimately, Yearbook scrapes the bottom of the trivia sarcophagus: Even having seen every episode, I couldn’t place some of the so-called key references, like the endless rosters of Sunnydale’s sports teams. About as informative as a rerun—and not nearly as entertaining. C-"
The article notes: "... this year there's one gift that will make you look smart, funny and cool. And, really, that's why we give gifts, isn't it? To look cool? It's "The Sunnydale High 1999 Yearbook" (Pocket Books, $16.95). That's the school that just graduated Buffy Summers, the once-in-a-generation slayer, enemy of vampires, demons and other evil creatures with bad skin. What we've got here is one of the best TV tie-in gifts in years, a clever connection to "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" that's as ironic as the series. To sum up the year, the yearbook gushes: "We're proud to say the class of '99 has the lowest mortality rate of any graduating class." It's hard to compete with that kind of achievement, but here are a few more gift ideas for people who just love TV. It comes with senior class photos and summaries, pictures of activities (proms, graduation, demon attacks), and autographs to Buffy (Willow wrote: "You made me grow. Not in a getting bigger way. Another way.")."
The book notes: "Other paratexts followed, including the 1999 release of Sunnydale High Yearbook, co-authored by tie-in phenoms Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder. The Yearbook is designed with verisimilitude in mind, as if it is an actual high school yearbook—complete with "signatures" on the inside front and back covers, "handwritten" notes throughout, and descriptions of school events from the show's diegesis such as Halloween, the Talent Show, the Sadie Hawkins Dance, and the Spring Fling, accompanied, of course, with pictures from the corresponding episodes as if they had been taken by the yearbook committee. Transmedial by nature, both of these kinds of paratexts suggest a life for the show beyond its televisual borders."
The article notes: "Young adult. Sunnydale High Yearbook, by Christopher Golden and Nancy Holder, 1999. Even though Buffy and her crew have immersed themselves in college life, at times they will feel nostalgic for their former high school. Because the actual building is a huge mass of charred rubble, they will have to turn to the Sunnydale High Yearbook to relive their memories. And now so can you. Buffy's yearbook, complete with color pictures, messages from classmates and an "in memoriam" section that lists people who fell to the evil in Sunnydale, is available for you to look at."
The result was keep. More consensus for keep than drafify, as well as it passes guidelines after the major expansion. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Nikolay Atanasov
This biography of an Olympic athlete was created under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only reference is a database entry.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Primary, database bio | 1. "Николай Атанасов – СКЛА ЛОКОМОТИВ ПЛОВДИВ". atletikalokomotiv.com (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Interview, primary | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b "Джоко: Сега е моето време". Sportal.bg (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Database listing | 3. ^ "Bulgarian Indoor Championships". GBR Athletics. Athletics Weekly. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Database listing | 4. ^ "Bulgarian Championships". GBR Athletics. Athletics Weekly. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Database listing | 5. ^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Nikolay Atanasov at World Athletics Edit this at Wikidata |
Database listing | 6. ^ "Senior 2003: Long Jump men". World Athletics. Retrieved 2 February 2024. |
Mill news about event | 7. ^ Blitz.bg/Sport. "Джоко шампион на България за седми път". Blitz.bg/sport (in Bulgarian). Retrieved 2024-01-28. |
Mill news about subject opening a business | 8. ^ "Джоко стана бизнесмен". BGathletic.com (in Bulgarian). |
Loved by some and reviled by others, Joko [Atanasov's nickname] is one of the most interesting and eccentric personalities– it is guaranteed that there is further coverage of this out there, but already we seem to have enough (expansion proves WP:NBASIC, plus the one random source I clicked on is WP:SPORTBASIC pass). WP:DRAFTIFY is effectively a death sentence for articles without an interested editor who will try to save it; not seeing the point of doing it here. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:44, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or draftify?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content? The fact that over 1,000 words can be written in the article make this a crystal clear pass of WP:NBASIC. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus among editors to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 08:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Stub politics article, the criteria for it being nominated are as follows: poorly sourced Content Fork WP:CF covered else where by Social Class, Political Class, Marxian class theory, and Class conflict... but also Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT.
Examples of poor sourcing are as follows: "Israel/Palestine : the quest for dialogue" (1991) [64] by Gordon & Gordon, does not contain the terms on 145 as claimed, likewise "Specters of Marx" (1994) [65], by Jacques Derrida, and "French intellectual nobility : institutional and symbolic transformations in the post-Sartrian era" (1996) [66] by Niilo Kauppi both do not contain the terms "Oppressor" and "Oppressed" at all. This leaves four disparate sources (two from Marxists, one from a conservative, and one about Israel Palestine) which technically pass verifiability, but don't seem to be discussing a unified concept or theory at all. Besides which, as mentioned earlier, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. RecardedByzantian ( talk) 06:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 22:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic. PROD removed. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 07:06, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable "list" topic. This was created as a spin-out/subpage of Michigan Technological University Winter Carnival by archivists at the school, and I agree that it is too long as currently formed to go back into that parent article. But I don't see that this content is of encyclopediac value at all (NOTDIR, and DUE even if it were to be merged back in). In order to merit an own page, it needs to be a notable actual topic, not just "overflow from some other notable-topic's article". DMacks ( talk) 05:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Wisconsin#District 3. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable WP:NPOL: candidate not elected to any office yet, currently one of three candidates running in a primary election for selection as a party's nominated candidate for a November 2024 election to national office. In a WP:BEFORE search I can find only routine local coverage. Wikishovel ( talk) 04:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Redirect >>>> 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Wisconsin#District 3 Djflem ( talk) 07:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 10:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Did not find any sources about this composer and the only source used for his article is just a list of credits for games they composed. GamerPro64 04:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 03:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:JOURNALIST. A google news search comes up with a namesake in Australia. LibStar ( talk) 02:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
It is unclear what the exact topic is here. Whether it is the concept of provable fairness / provably fair games, or a specific algorithm dubbed as "Provably Fair" sourced to a gambling site [74]. Either way, there does not seem to be significant coverage in reliable sources, especially for the later. MarioGom ( talk) 17:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:25, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 01:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 05:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Was just gonna leave tags on this, but they've been reverted, so I guess I may as well do this instead. Sources on this page consist of primaries (one from the game, two from Capcom's website), one database (Behind the Voice Actors), and a couple from what I believe are third party game guide books. I don't know the reliability of all of those sources (BtVA I can't imagine being reliable, and the non-primaries I wouldn't expect to be), but I know none of them convey notability. Otherwise, this page is full of what could probably be summarized as fancruft that is better left to fan sites than here, especially with none of it sourced. Could redirect to Darkstalkers#Characters, though I think deletion makes more sense since that section doesn't currently have any sort of list or significant detail on any individual characters. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 02:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep, agree that this is something to be handled with cleanup and not deletion. - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 18:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Charlie Puth. Sandstein 18:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
This song has not been the subject of "multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label" as required by WP:NSONGS. As such, it is unlikely to ever grow beyond stub status and the content to present it as a standalone article does not exist. The New Zealand "Hot Singles" entry does not constitute a significant national chart, and it is usually relegated to a footnote on the discography page. N Ø 18:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 01:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Small nucleolar RNA. Liz Read! Talk! 08:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; based off one source and WP:BEFORE was no help. One source has only very slight, passing coverage that I doubt even verifies most of the claims here anyway. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 15:13, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Kurykh (
talk) 01:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Transactions per second. Sandstein 20:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
scholar.google.com
search brings up a ton of articles discussing both. I really don't understand how/why the notability of this subject is being questioned.
Sohom (
talk) 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 04:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 01:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion on pl wiki ( pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2024:02:05:Hans Skopowny). Likely hoax or WP:OR on non-notable individual. Sources impossible to verify (no ISBNs/URLs, either false or translated from Ukrainian to a variant that doesn't exist outside Wikipedia). All other articles of the creator likely suffer from the same issue (over a dozen: [75]). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Article speedy deleted from pl wiki for "Non-encyclopedic article: ahistorical family fantasies, misspelled". We should do the same. It does not seem this family is notable ( WP:GNG), and WP:OR is a major issue. Sources are not possible to verify - no URLs, no ISBNs for the book, the titles of the books and other information seem to be translated from Ukrainian/Russian making it impossible to verify they even exist since Wikipedia is the only place they are used in this version. Possible hoax - hard to guess whether this is indeed OR on one's family or something at the level of Zhemao hoaxes. Pretty much all other articles of that editor need to be deleted for the same reason, I'll be nominating them shortly. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[...] this Hierophant-Warrior dynasty, which ruled almost the all ancient World, bore the unique Devine kingship. It was a Universal Vedic Slovic-Aryan civilization existed for millennia in the territory from Dublin to Vladivostok [...].