It is approximately 7:38 PM where this user lives ( BST). [ ] |
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
You tagged Harry W. Hunt with a note which requests showing the "notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention."
There are a total of seven sources cited from reliable secondary sources (the Golbe and Mail and Toronto Star newspapers) all of which provide significant coverage rather than a trival mention, as demonstrated by the headlines of the articles, as follows:
Accordingly, the notability requirement has been fulfilled. Wellington Bay ( talk) 01:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Mccapra Thank you for your review of my article on Anton Franzen and for your informative note. I now have added an edit summary to the article as requested, indicating that there was a partial translation from the German wiki article. I would appreciate it if you would be so kind as to review the note to see that it is sufficient to give full attribution to the prior article. I usually try to paraphrase when using material from other articles and, if copying, am sure to include any applicable inline references. In future, I will include the translation edit summary also. Thanks again for your assistance and guidance. Historybuff0105 ( talk) 18:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention to my article. I have added the additional credible source in support of this page. Qigong4wellness ( talk) 21:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giovanni Ricci.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey Mccapra, I noticed that you marked this redirect as reviewed after I had tagged it for CSD R2 deletion. I would not recommend doing this, and it's not endorsed by the new page patrol guidelines either. Most of the time, of course, a page tagged for speedy deletion will be deleted by an administrator soon after, so marking it as reviewed wouldn't do much. However, if the tag is contested, this will result in the page staying in mainspace, but bypassing the review. This potential for abuse is mitigated by leaving pages with CSD tags (and PROD tags, for that matter) in the queue. Let me know if you have any questions! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 19:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Why have you listed my article as a hoax? GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 13:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Mccapra,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Please don't worry, I'm just learning to edit articles (like as Qingshui metro station). BartkovskyMc ( talk) 14:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
It is approximately 7:38 PM where this user lives ( BST). [ ] |
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
You tagged Harry W. Hunt with a note which requests showing the "notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention."
There are a total of seven sources cited from reliable secondary sources (the Golbe and Mail and Toronto Star newspapers) all of which provide significant coverage rather than a trival mention, as demonstrated by the headlines of the articles, as follows:
Accordingly, the notability requirement has been fulfilled. Wellington Bay ( talk) 01:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Mccapra Thank you for your review of my article on Anton Franzen and for your informative note. I now have added an edit summary to the article as requested, indicating that there was a partial translation from the German wiki article. I would appreciate it if you would be so kind as to review the note to see that it is sufficient to give full attribution to the prior article. I usually try to paraphrase when using material from other articles and, if copying, am sure to include any applicable inline references. In future, I will include the translation edit summary also. Thanks again for your assistance and guidance. Historybuff0105 ( talk) 18:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention to my article. I have added the additional credible source in support of this page. Qigong4wellness ( talk) 21:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ricci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giovanni Ricci.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey Mccapra, I noticed that you marked this redirect as reviewed after I had tagged it for CSD R2 deletion. I would not recommend doing this, and it's not endorsed by the new page patrol guidelines either. Most of the time, of course, a page tagged for speedy deletion will be deleted by an administrator soon after, so marking it as reviewed wouldn't do much. However, if the tag is contested, this will result in the page staying in mainspace, but bypassing the review. This potential for abuse is mitigated by leaving pages with CSD tags (and PROD tags, for that matter) in the queue. Let me know if you have any questions! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 19:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Why have you listed my article as a hoax? GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 13:02, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Mccapra,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Please don't worry, I'm just learning to edit articles (like as Qingshui metro station). BartkovskyMc ( talk) 14:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)