- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 15:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Marquee Broadcasting
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marquee Broadcasting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage about the company. Sources are all either covering routine business transactions or are primary. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies, United States of America, and Maryland. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There is absolutely no reason this page should be deleted. Marquee is a smaller broadcaster which does not instantly mean the page should be deleted. It is a fairly young company as well, which means it does not have the extensive history of a broadcaster like Tegna (the former Gannett), but this does not automatically mean it should be deleted. KansasCityKSMO ( talk) 00:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Oh look, there are sources, like, there are sources. It shows that it's notable. Like, this whole AfD makes no sense at all, like, what's the point of this AfD?? mer764KCTV( Talk) 03:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The article has good notability to the point that this AfD shouldn't have been made. OWaunTon ( talk) 15:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP ((KmTvFan [User:Kmtvfan|me]] ( talk to me 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)))
Comment: I won't vote without a BEFORE search, but I'm entirely unconvinced any of the sources in article are sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH Mach61 ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. RL0919 ( talk) 15:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Marquee Broadcasting
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marquee Broadcasting ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP due to a lack of significant coverage about the company. Sources are all either covering routine business transactions or are primary. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies, United States of America, and Maryland. Let'srun ( talk) 14:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There is absolutely no reason this page should be deleted. Marquee is a smaller broadcaster which does not instantly mean the page should be deleted. It is a fairly young company as well, which means it does not have the extensive history of a broadcaster like Tegna (the former Gannett), but this does not automatically mean it should be deleted. KansasCityKSMO ( talk) 00:57, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Oh look, there are sources, like, there are sources. It shows that it's notable. Like, this whole AfD makes no sense at all, like, what's the point of this AfD?? mer764KCTV( Talk) 03:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The article has good notability to the point that this AfD shouldn't have been made. OWaunTon ( talk) 15:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- KEEP ((KmTvFan [User:Kmtvfan|me]] ( talk to me 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)))
Comment: I won't vote without a BEFORE search, but I'm entirely unconvinced any of the sources in article are sufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH Mach61 ( talk) 17:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.