Points of interest related to
Radio on Wikipedia: History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Radio. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
watch |
I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Also, most of the sources are YouTube videos, primary sources, press announcments and do not help to assert notability. Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a radio broadcaster, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for radio broadcasters.
The notability claim here, that she's been an announcer for national radio networks in Australia, would be fine if the article were demonstrating that she passes
WP:GNG for it -- but notability doesn't vest in doing stuff per se, it vests in the amount of third-party journalistic coverage she did or didn't receive about the stuff she did to establish that it's been externally validated as significant, so just existing as a radio host is not "inherently" notable without sourcing for it. But this is completely unsourced, and has an overall writing tone strongly suggestive of somebody just doing a thinly veiled rewrite of her staff profile on the
self-published website of her own employer (which was, predictably, the sole "source" ever previously cited here, until it got removed as a deadlink, but was never proper support for notability as it isn't independent of her).
As the content here hinges entirely on stuff that happened between 1999 and 2010, with no further updates in the past 14 years, I'm willing to withdraw this if someone with much better access than I've got to archived Australian media coverage from the naughts can find enough proper coverage to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on the sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in both WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. While the subject has received some press coverage, but it's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them. WP:ROTM coverage is not sufficient to pass WP:N — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 14:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 19:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Points of interest related to
Radio on Wikipedia: History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Radio. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
watch |
I am also nominating the following related pages because [insert reason here]:
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of WP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of ardent fans; another excessively bloated list that is fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Additionally WP:NOTDATABASE and WP:ROUTINE. Also, most of the sources are YouTube videos, primary sources, press announcments and do not help to assert notability. Those arguing for a keep claiming how useful it is, shall be advised to refer to WP:USEFUL. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 17:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized
WP:BLP of a radio broadcaster, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for radio broadcasters.
The notability claim here, that she's been an announcer for national radio networks in Australia, would be fine if the article were demonstrating that she passes
WP:GNG for it -- but notability doesn't vest in doing stuff per se, it vests in the amount of third-party journalistic coverage she did or didn't receive about the stuff she did to establish that it's been externally validated as significant, so just existing as a radio host is not "inherently" notable without sourcing for it. But this is completely unsourced, and has an overall writing tone strongly suggestive of somebody just doing a thinly veiled rewrite of her staff profile on the
self-published website of her own employer (which was, predictably, the sole "source" ever previously cited here, until it got removed as a deadlink, but was never proper support for notability as it isn't independent of her).
As the content here hinges entirely on stuff that happened between 1999 and 2010, with no further updates in the past 14 years, I'm willing to withdraw this if someone with much better access than I've got to archived Australian media coverage from the naughts can find enough proper coverage to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on the sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:56, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The subject fails to meet the criteria outlined in both WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. While the subject has received some press coverage, but it's too common for journalists to get some sort of press attention on every one of them. WP:ROTM coverage is not sufficient to pass WP:N — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 14:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 15:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 19:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)