Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13
Hey, is there evidence beyond the page history that there's been UPE at Ernest & Celestine: A Trip to Gibberitia? As much as I'm surprised to see the IP editor add a reception section claiming 100% approval on Rotten Tomatoes this late in the game, the citation appears legit and with 23 critics' reviews, it meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 16:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
This page was recently moved to draftspace by you, with the reason being "it has no sources and Refs are clickbait, interview and social media.." Can you please identify which sources are categorized as "clickbait" or originate from social media? And to say that this article "has no sources" is an assertion that lacks any basis. The Miami Herald and New York Times are unquestionably regarded as credible sources. While I can recognize that some of the sources used in this article may not be of the highest journalistic standards, this is commonplace within the domain of television personalities like the one under discussion. To illustrate, you can refer to other individuals in similar roles, such as Jacqueline Laurita, Dina Cantin, Carlton Gebbia, Gizelle Bryant, Ashley Darby, etc. You'll notice that these pages cite numerous sources that are considerably less reputable compared to the ones utilized in this article. With that said, moving the page to draftspace is not an appropriate measure, as it is on par, if not more qualified, compared to that of its peers. The move appears to be an unjustified exercise of authority, as the reasons cited for the move are completely unfounded. I have submitted the draft however, the most suitable course of action at this point would be for you to re-publish the page. CityLimitsJunction ( talk) 17:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sha Shtil, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 11:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep,
I have come across that picture of Rachel Dübendorfer you uploaded : File:Rachel_Dübendorfer.jpg.
I have checked the source you provided ( https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190827) and I have not found that picture in the file.
By the way, there are several copies of a photograph of Dübendorfer in the files https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190819 and https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190820, but she doesn't look much like this one.
Are you sure you there is no mistake ?
Regards, Rob1bureau ( talk) 13:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed you moved the Janusirsasana page I created to Drafts, citing "more sources needed" as the reason. I'm a bit confused. According to Wikipedia's general notability guideline and based on WP:3REFS, the Janusirsasana page would have notability & enough sources since I've used more than 3 reliable, in-depth references that are independent of each other. Additionally, there are many pages currently in existence that use 5 or less reliable sources. For example, Matsyasana is a C-class article with 5 sources. Pasasana is a start-class page with 4 sources. Split gymnastics is a start-class page with 3 sources. I plan to move the page out of drafts if there is nothing else wrong with the page. Thanks! Whitestar12 ( talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
As for Janusirsasana, it has long been a redirect to Paschimottanasana where it is discussed. We have the major asanas as articles, with similar asanas treated as variants: here, the sitting in stick pose is the root asana, and sitting like that with one leg folded is a variant. We don't need another article on the same thing. If someone has deletedthe redirect, we need it back!
All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Just thanking you for the review of my page Travelling North. There was originally an article by the same title but it referred to the later film of the same name, derived from the play; I thought the play deserved its own official article! It turned out to be an interesting one to write (David W. is a good author with a lot to say, behind its apparently simple premise...) Anyway hi from Australia, where "north" means warm, south cold; the (e.g. UK or US.) equivalent would be relocating to the Mediterranean maybe, or Florida! Cheers - Tony Rees Tony 1212 ( talk) 17:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Please don't add bare url template to the pages where there's no bare reference such as Kamaksha temple. Thanks, Egeymi ( talk) 18:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Scope_creep, Would you like to write the article about Henk Pelser (Q110847318) for the English wikipedia? It'll be appreciated if it is done. Boss-well63 ( talk) 09:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Would you mind amending the section heading you inserted here? It breaks the listing of the listed Afds. Maybe ";" is enough (instead of ==)? Thank you very much. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
ToBeFree extended-confirmed protected Elinruby ( talk) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The Independent, a British newspaper, is considered a reliable source for non-specialist information. In March 2016, the publication discontinued its print edition to become an online newspaper; some editors advise caution for articles published after this date.
Hi Scope creep,
Just wrote an article about Selchow in the German Wikipedia. While studying Weierud's & Zabell's brilliant Cryptologia article "German Mathematicians and Cryptology in WWII" spotted the footnote #38 on page 125. From that Selchow's first name was Curt (not: Kurt).
Best wishes -- OS ( talk) 17:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Greetings!
Can you help with advice on what information has an advertising flavor and should be removed from the article? What else needs to be changed to return the article to the main space? The remarks in the title, unfortunately, seem too general.
Best regards. Yevrowl ( talk) 19:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey,what about Devin Millar in other languages? There is 2 languages Español and Francis,can you help or find whoever remove them?Thank you 2001:EE0:5005:81A0:ACD3:2F49:4492:2C82 ( talk) 14:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks,Devin Millar is just a fraud person,he whatever he can make himself show up in this wiki or other language just to promote himself freely (Such as official Wikipedia),even also break these rules freely,beware that person,i heard that person botted himself just to get more fans or clearly for hoax and lair all over years(Due to lack of his fans),he also make nsfw for kid or some stuff did similar to other person named EDP445 did,so careful this person,he also make alt accounts just to record himself up without being noticed.If you want know more,maybe you can ask some peoples in NFS or other community for better information,proof.I can't talk more about that person here and i'm stick of it.Thank you for reading and hope you know a bit about that person,bye. 2001:EE0:5005:81A0:ACD3:2F49:4492:2C82 ( talk) 16:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Scope creep, I saw that you moved DOK.fest to draftspace. This article has been on Wikipedia for many years, on Internationales Dokumentarfilmfestival München. DrUtrecht ( talk) 10:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much for your consideration and for taking time to review my articles and provide constructive, positive feedback. Much appreciated! 💚🤍💚🤍 TheEagle107 ( talk) 22:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, thank you for correcting the writing errors in the article in English Dhruv Sharma (singer), could you give it a linguistic review in simplified English where it currently maintains a deletion query. Regards and thanks again https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Sharma 57ntaledane9 ( talk) 20:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Why discogs is non-rs if many articles list it as a source and there are no problems with it(example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burial_(Death_in_June_album) )? Ezoteric bimbo ( talk) 07:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, could you explain to me in more detail why this user User:Drmies is deleting links to the singer placed in the right place Dhruv Sharma (singer), he also deleted references and is committing arbitrary acts if many users had already reviewed it and there was no problem, I'm afraid. is committing an editorial war. Help 57ntaledane9 ( talk) 17:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Creation of articles without sources, not acknowledging user talk page discussions Shazback ( talk) 23:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep,
Just wrote an article about Wilhelm Gimmler in the German Wikipedia and spotted yours in the English one. As far as I see it, he was born in Kontschwitz in 1890, a village in Lower Silesian, which was a part of the German empire when he was born. In 1936 the name was changed to Hohenlinde, and then to Kończyce after 1945.
In your article however the village is linked to Hohenlinden in Bavaria, which is a completely other community and has nothing to do with the Hohenlinde in Silesia. Best wishes -- OS ( talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
I shared a reference evaluation on the talk page of Draft:Ravi Ahuja based off your comment related to the submission decline. The sources are from credible platforms, most of them are widely used on Wikipedia. Additionally, upon reevaluation I didn't find them to be or similar to press releases or paid promotions.
Regards,
Keithmurban ( talk) 06:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Scope creep for collecting more than 200 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
Worm Gear Award | ||
This award is given in recognition to Scope creep for collecting at least 7 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hey! Not sure if you saw, but it looks like Contact center as a service got recreated after your initial Contact Center as a service BLAR. I don't have the full background, but it looks like a new version cropped up after disappearing, without attribution, which seems to be a problem. Unsure about the status between the two. (The second person also created Artificial intelligence in customer experience.) Utopes ( talk / cont) 09:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
About this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment#Importance scale says that the Low-priority rating "includes most of the following: very rare diseases, lesser-known medical signs, equipment, hospitals, individuals, historical information..."
Joseph Lister is an individual, and (having been dead for over a century) arguably "historical". Therefore I think it is proper to rate him as low-priority. (Also as being a person, which is what that |society=yes
parameter is about.) Do you think the scale justifies a different priority for the group?
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 05:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
|importance=
or |priority=
ratings for WikiProjects are about how interested the group is in improving the articles, which often have nothing to do with real-world importance. We used to tag
Leonardo da Vinci as low importance (i.e., to us), and eventually someone apparently decided the subject was so unimportant to us that we don't tag the article at all any longer.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 19:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I came across your here and wondered how you concluded that this review was written by the author himself. I also first thought so seeing the "by Gonzalo Lira" tagline, but couldn't this be a book review page mentioning the author of the reviewed book, rather than the author of the review? I am also sceptical of the reliability of Kirkus reviews but would like to see whether I missed something. AncientWalrus ( talk) 10:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Concerning this edit, please note that lenta.ru is only unreliable after 12 March 2014. Before that date, it is not considered unreliable. Ymblanter ( talk) 17:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you removed File:Rachel Dübendorfer.jpg from Rachel Dübendorfer in this edit? The image looks to be okay as a fair use image of her. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Check out the building image. This is something I see UPEs regularly slip up on, the uploaded images. I can see from the metadata this is professional photography and not likely to be uploaded for free by the photographer. BusterD ( talk) 15:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rachel Dübendorfer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Élisa Mercœur contains the word "orphange" twice, would you be so kind to check if they are typos and if so, replace them with "orphanage". Polygnotus ( talk) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Please check if this edit is correct. Polygnotus ( talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I reported the Hazooyi, Anoghena Okoyomoh, and Cece GFI accounts for socking. There's just too much coincidence with timing, and AfD's, and non-notable UPE articles to not believe they're all connected. And some bad acting, today. You can read my evidence here if you like. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 19:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the second time I've come across you WP:BITING and threatening newcomers. Maybe this isn't a representative sample, but you need to calm down. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 20:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
So I managed to consolidate the refs on that Murray article, but one thing I didn't plan for was the individual ref names that aren't in the consolidated list. Is there a format to add those back in, or should I just go to the second instance where each source is invoked and double the reference there? Fred Zepelin ( talk) 22:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dimarjio Antonion Jenkins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Scope creep,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Sfns are not my best thing and he likes you better than me. Plus I just growled at him yesterday over changing images after the alts were written. He *is* awful new, necessary to the project, and on his third language, I keep reminding myself. But yes at least some of the new reference errors are from the slavery section. The main things I see him not getting that format matters, E.Lastname is alphabetized under Lastname, and the year really has to match. Or should I just fix the ones I understand? Actually, some of them I understand but am not sure how to fix. De Grammont has a range of years because there are multiple volumes at that link and the items are for the particular volume. De Haëdo and a couple of the others have modern-day reissues, etc. I seem to recall that orange means it *was* broken, but it's brown we have to worry about? De Grammont used to be working (?) Elinruby ( talk) 14:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
half the talk page was missing when I wrote that. Sorry.
I moved some headers. My fault. I will fix it. Meanwhile huh. I got pinged into a MoS capitalization argument and Mathglot asked me for help and I found out that a courtly old Brazilian editor who helped me a lot died a few months ago. I wonder if you have a spare moment if you could take a look a a look at the mayhem I caused on my userpage last night when I was crying about that? It turns out that I can't run the errand I thought I was going to run for a couple of hours yet so I guess I will tackle the strike tag. War with Spain is done except for the many names of Mohammed ben Othman and making sure I checked the references.
I have excused myself from any further discussion of whether "chair" is a name. What the hell. The things you get pinged into, eh?
If you really want to work on the article, I suggest scrutiny of the Manufacturing section with extreme prejudice. There also probably should be additional mention of ship-building and slaves in that section. Or not. If you need a break from this, take one. Now is an ideal time. I hope to restore sanity and have an updated to-do by tomorrow. Elinruby ( talk) 20:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Scope creep, hope you're doing good, first thank you for this massive work on Regency of Algiers, i beleive the article progressed really well, but i don't know what caused Elin to be so upset. If i understand well this has to do with some of my edits that have issues with spelling, but i think there are no issues with that anymore since, well Elin worked on that and i made sure not to undo or change any of its edits; unless i was adding additions while taking account of her suggestions. Suddenly she became upset for un unkown reason for me...Hopefully she comes back, i really want this article to become GA or even FA as this would really give so much credit to both of you. She's part of this and i want her to keep being part of it.
Other than that i have reworked agriculture, education and Crisis of the 19th century sections and first paragraph of political status.) if there is anything more to work i'm available.
Thanks! Nourerrahmane ( talk) 10:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm no pushover regarding new articles....of the approx 1,400 articles that I've done NPP on in the last 90 days I'd guess I've taken about 50-100 to AFD with about half of those kept, and left notes on another 20-40 saying it shouldn't be a seperate article. With respect to meeting the GNG sourcing requirement, this article has them a lot stronger than the norm on kept articles. There been discussion at AFC about reviewers using different criteria than the AFC criteria which is: having reasonable chance at surviving at AFD. In short the previous reviews on this really didn't review according to this standard, centric on whether it has GNG sourcing. And all of the ones that had specifics (vs. just referring to previous reviews) basically said that it had some (or many) low grade sources in it. IMO an easily made error or misunderstanding.....to look at the general nature of a sample of the 57 sources rather than seeing if it did/didn't have 2 (or 1 or 3) sources to meet the norm regarding GNG. IMHO at the AFD you are promugating an interpretation that is in some cases not applicable (NCorp standards on a person article) but more to my point here is so unusually strict that such would result in rejection of about 90% of new articles.
In several cases, after I took an article to AFD and people came up with sourcing or arguments which changed the situation; I just happily changed my opinion to "keep". I consider it a better reflection on my self to be able to leave what I said previously rather than being mentally invested in arguing for what I said previously. Also better for my fun and sanity in Wikipedia work. I don't know if this is useful or applicable or not but thought I'd say it. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 20:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13
Hey, is there evidence beyond the page history that there's been UPE at Ernest & Celestine: A Trip to Gibberitia? As much as I'm surprised to see the IP editor add a reception section claiming 100% approval on Rotten Tomatoes this late in the game, the citation appears legit and with 23 critics' reviews, it meets WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 16:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
This page was recently moved to draftspace by you, with the reason being "it has no sources and Refs are clickbait, interview and social media.." Can you please identify which sources are categorized as "clickbait" or originate from social media? And to say that this article "has no sources" is an assertion that lacks any basis. The Miami Herald and New York Times are unquestionably regarded as credible sources. While I can recognize that some of the sources used in this article may not be of the highest journalistic standards, this is commonplace within the domain of television personalities like the one under discussion. To illustrate, you can refer to other individuals in similar roles, such as Jacqueline Laurita, Dina Cantin, Carlton Gebbia, Gizelle Bryant, Ashley Darby, etc. You'll notice that these pages cite numerous sources that are considerably less reputable compared to the ones utilized in this article. With that said, moving the page to draftspace is not an appropriate measure, as it is on par, if not more qualified, compared to that of its peers. The move appears to be an unjustified exercise of authority, as the reasons cited for the move are completely unfounded. I have submitted the draft however, the most suitable course of action at this point would be for you to re-publish the page. CityLimitsJunction ( talk) 17:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sha Shtil, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 11:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep,
I have come across that picture of Rachel Dübendorfer you uploaded : File:Rachel_Dübendorfer.jpg.
I have checked the source you provided ( https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190827) and I have not found that picture in the file.
By the way, there are several copies of a photograph of Dübendorfer in the files https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190819 and https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C11190820, but she doesn't look much like this one.
Are you sure you there is no mistake ?
Regards, Rob1bureau ( talk) 13:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed you moved the Janusirsasana page I created to Drafts, citing "more sources needed" as the reason. I'm a bit confused. According to Wikipedia's general notability guideline and based on WP:3REFS, the Janusirsasana page would have notability & enough sources since I've used more than 3 reliable, in-depth references that are independent of each other. Additionally, there are many pages currently in existence that use 5 or less reliable sources. For example, Matsyasana is a C-class article with 5 sources. Pasasana is a start-class page with 4 sources. Split gymnastics is a start-class page with 3 sources. I plan to move the page out of drafts if there is nothing else wrong with the page. Thanks! Whitestar12 ( talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
As for Janusirsasana, it has long been a redirect to Paschimottanasana where it is discussed. We have the major asanas as articles, with similar asanas treated as variants: here, the sitting in stick pose is the root asana, and sitting like that with one leg folded is a variant. We don't need another article on the same thing. If someone has deletedthe redirect, we need it back!
All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Just thanking you for the review of my page Travelling North. There was originally an article by the same title but it referred to the later film of the same name, derived from the play; I thought the play deserved its own official article! It turned out to be an interesting one to write (David W. is a good author with a lot to say, behind its apparently simple premise...) Anyway hi from Australia, where "north" means warm, south cold; the (e.g. UK or US.) equivalent would be relocating to the Mediterranean maybe, or Florida! Cheers - Tony Rees Tony 1212 ( talk) 17:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Please don't add bare url template to the pages where there's no bare reference such as Kamaksha temple. Thanks, Egeymi ( talk) 18:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Scope_creep, Would you like to write the article about Henk Pelser (Q110847318) for the English wikipedia? It'll be appreciated if it is done. Boss-well63 ( talk) 09:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Would you mind amending the section heading you inserted here? It breaks the listing of the listed Afds. Maybe ";" is enough (instead of ==)? Thank you very much. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
ToBeFree extended-confirmed protected Elinruby ( talk) 20:12, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The Independent, a British newspaper, is considered a reliable source for non-specialist information. In March 2016, the publication discontinued its print edition to become an online newspaper; some editors advise caution for articles published after this date.
Hi Scope creep,
Just wrote an article about Selchow in the German Wikipedia. While studying Weierud's & Zabell's brilliant Cryptologia article "German Mathematicians and Cryptology in WWII" spotted the footnote #38 on page 125. From that Selchow's first name was Curt (not: Kurt).
Best wishes -- OS ( talk) 17:45, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Greetings!
Can you help with advice on what information has an advertising flavor and should be removed from the article? What else needs to be changed to return the article to the main space? The remarks in the title, unfortunately, seem too general.
Best regards. Yevrowl ( talk) 19:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey,what about Devin Millar in other languages? There is 2 languages Español and Francis,can you help or find whoever remove them?Thank you 2001:EE0:5005:81A0:ACD3:2F49:4492:2C82 ( talk) 14:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks,Devin Millar is just a fraud person,he whatever he can make himself show up in this wiki or other language just to promote himself freely (Such as official Wikipedia),even also break these rules freely,beware that person,i heard that person botted himself just to get more fans or clearly for hoax and lair all over years(Due to lack of his fans),he also make nsfw for kid or some stuff did similar to other person named EDP445 did,so careful this person,he also make alt accounts just to record himself up without being noticed.If you want know more,maybe you can ask some peoples in NFS or other community for better information,proof.I can't talk more about that person here and i'm stick of it.Thank you for reading and hope you know a bit about that person,bye. 2001:EE0:5005:81A0:ACD3:2F49:4492:2C82 ( talk) 16:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Scope creep, I saw that you moved DOK.fest to draftspace. This article has been on Wikipedia for many years, on Internationales Dokumentarfilmfestival München. DrUtrecht ( talk) 10:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you so much for your consideration and for taking time to review my articles and provide constructive, positive feedback. Much appreciated! 💚🤍💚🤍 TheEagle107 ( talk) 22:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hello, thank you for correcting the writing errors in the article in English Dhruv Sharma (singer), could you give it a linguistic review in simplified English where it currently maintains a deletion query. Regards and thanks again https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhruv_Sharma 57ntaledane9 ( talk) 20:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Why discogs is non-rs if many articles list it as a source and there are no problems with it(example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burial_(Death_in_June_album) )? Ezoteric bimbo ( talk) 07:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, could you explain to me in more detail why this user User:Drmies is deleting links to the singer placed in the right place Dhruv Sharma (singer), he also deleted references and is committing arbitrary acts if many users had already reviewed it and there was no problem, I'm afraid. is committing an editorial war. Help 57ntaledane9 ( talk) 17:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Creation of articles without sources, not acknowledging user talk page discussions Shazback ( talk) 23:33, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep,
Just wrote an article about Wilhelm Gimmler in the German Wikipedia and spotted yours in the English one. As far as I see it, he was born in Kontschwitz in 1890, a village in Lower Silesian, which was a part of the German empire when he was born. In 1936 the name was changed to Hohenlinde, and then to Kończyce after 1945.
In your article however the village is linked to Hohenlinden in Bavaria, which is a completely other community and has nothing to do with the Hohenlinde in Silesia. Best wishes -- OS ( talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
I shared a reference evaluation on the talk page of Draft:Ravi Ahuja based off your comment related to the submission decline. The sources are from credible platforms, most of them are widely used on Wikipedia. Additionally, upon reevaluation I didn't find them to be or similar to press releases or paid promotions.
Regards,
Keithmurban ( talk) 06:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar | ||
This award is given in recognition to Scope creep for collecting more than 200 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 22:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
Worm Gear Award | ||
This award is given in recognition to Scope creep for collecting at least 7 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh ( talk) 23:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
Hey! Not sure if you saw, but it looks like Contact center as a service got recreated after your initial Contact Center as a service BLAR. I don't have the full background, but it looks like a new version cropped up after disappearing, without attribution, which seems to be a problem. Unsure about the status between the two. (The second person also created Artificial intelligence in customer experience.) Utopes ( talk / cont) 09:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
About this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Assessment#Importance scale says that the Low-priority rating "includes most of the following: very rare diseases, lesser-known medical signs, equipment, hospitals, individuals, historical information..."
Joseph Lister is an individual, and (having been dead for over a century) arguably "historical". Therefore I think it is proper to rate him as low-priority. (Also as being a person, which is what that |society=yes
parameter is about.) Do you think the scale justifies a different priority for the group?
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 05:33, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
|importance=
or |priority=
ratings for WikiProjects are about how interested the group is in improving the articles, which often have nothing to do with real-world importance. We used to tag
Leonardo da Vinci as low importance (i.e., to us), and eventually someone apparently decided the subject was so unimportant to us that we don't tag the article at all any longer.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 19:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
I came across your here and wondered how you concluded that this review was written by the author himself. I also first thought so seeing the "by Gonzalo Lira" tagline, but couldn't this be a book review page mentioning the author of the reviewed book, rather than the author of the review? I am also sceptical of the reliability of Kirkus reviews but would like to see whether I missed something. AncientWalrus ( talk) 10:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Concerning this edit, please note that lenta.ru is only unreliable after 12 March 2014. Before that date, it is not considered unreliable. Ymblanter ( talk) 17:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you removed File:Rachel Dübendorfer.jpg from Rachel Dübendorfer in this edit? The image looks to be okay as a fair use image of her. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 12:09, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Check out the building image. This is something I see UPEs regularly slip up on, the uploaded images. I can see from the metadata this is professional photography and not likely to be uploaded for free by the photographer. BusterD ( talk) 15:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rachel Dübendorfer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Élisa Mercœur contains the word "orphange" twice, would you be so kind to check if they are typos and if so, replace them with "orphanage". Polygnotus ( talk) 14:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Please check if this edit is correct. Polygnotus ( talk) 14:56, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I reported the Hazooyi, Anoghena Okoyomoh, and Cece GFI accounts for socking. There's just too much coincidence with timing, and AfD's, and non-notable UPE articles to not believe they're all connected. And some bad acting, today. You can read my evidence here if you like. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 19:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the second time I've come across you WP:BITING and threatening newcomers. Maybe this isn't a representative sample, but you need to calm down. 🌺 Cremastra ( talk) 20:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
So I managed to consolidate the refs on that Murray article, but one thing I didn't plan for was the individual ref names that aren't in the consolidated list. Is there a format to add those back in, or should I just go to the second instance where each source is invoked and double the reference there? Fred Zepelin ( talk) 22:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dimarjio Antonion Jenkins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Scope creep,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Sfns are not my best thing and he likes you better than me. Plus I just growled at him yesterday over changing images after the alts were written. He *is* awful new, necessary to the project, and on his third language, I keep reminding myself. But yes at least some of the new reference errors are from the slavery section. The main things I see him not getting that format matters, E.Lastname is alphabetized under Lastname, and the year really has to match. Or should I just fix the ones I understand? Actually, some of them I understand but am not sure how to fix. De Grammont has a range of years because there are multiple volumes at that link and the items are for the particular volume. De Haëdo and a couple of the others have modern-day reissues, etc. I seem to recall that orange means it *was* broken, but it's brown we have to worry about? De Grammont used to be working (?) Elinruby ( talk) 14:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
half the talk page was missing when I wrote that. Sorry.
I moved some headers. My fault. I will fix it. Meanwhile huh. I got pinged into a MoS capitalization argument and Mathglot asked me for help and I found out that a courtly old Brazilian editor who helped me a lot died a few months ago. I wonder if you have a spare moment if you could take a look a a look at the mayhem I caused on my userpage last night when I was crying about that? It turns out that I can't run the errand I thought I was going to run for a couple of hours yet so I guess I will tackle the strike tag. War with Spain is done except for the many names of Mohammed ben Othman and making sure I checked the references.
I have excused myself from any further discussion of whether "chair" is a name. What the hell. The things you get pinged into, eh?
If you really want to work on the article, I suggest scrutiny of the Manufacturing section with extreme prejudice. There also probably should be additional mention of ship-building and slaves in that section. Or not. If you need a break from this, take one. Now is an ideal time. I hope to restore sanity and have an updated to-do by tomorrow. Elinruby ( talk) 20:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Scope creep, hope you're doing good, first thank you for this massive work on Regency of Algiers, i beleive the article progressed really well, but i don't know what caused Elin to be so upset. If i understand well this has to do with some of my edits that have issues with spelling, but i think there are no issues with that anymore since, well Elin worked on that and i made sure not to undo or change any of its edits; unless i was adding additions while taking account of her suggestions. Suddenly she became upset for un unkown reason for me...Hopefully she comes back, i really want this article to become GA or even FA as this would really give so much credit to both of you. She's part of this and i want her to keep being part of it.
Other than that i have reworked agriculture, education and Crisis of the 19th century sections and first paragraph of political status.) if there is anything more to work i'm available.
Thanks! Nourerrahmane ( talk) 10:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm no pushover regarding new articles....of the approx 1,400 articles that I've done NPP on in the last 90 days I'd guess I've taken about 50-100 to AFD with about half of those kept, and left notes on another 20-40 saying it shouldn't be a seperate article. With respect to meeting the GNG sourcing requirement, this article has them a lot stronger than the norm on kept articles. There been discussion at AFC about reviewers using different criteria than the AFC criteria which is: having reasonable chance at surviving at AFD. In short the previous reviews on this really didn't review according to this standard, centric on whether it has GNG sourcing. And all of the ones that had specifics (vs. just referring to previous reviews) basically said that it had some (or many) low grade sources in it. IMO an easily made error or misunderstanding.....to look at the general nature of a sample of the 57 sources rather than seeing if it did/didn't have 2 (or 1 or 3) sources to meet the norm regarding GNG. IMHO at the AFD you are promugating an interpretation that is in some cases not applicable (NCorp standards on a person article) but more to my point here is so unusually strict that such would result in rejection of about 90% of new articles.
In several cases, after I took an article to AFD and people came up with sourcing or arguments which changed the situation; I just happily changed my opinion to "keep". I consider it a better reflection on my self to be able to leave what I said previously rather than being mentally invested in arguing for what I said previously. Also better for my fun and sanity in Wikipedia work. I don't know if this is useful or applicable or not but thought I'd say it. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 20:20, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging