This user is a polyglot and likes languages a bit too much for their own good. They're happy to try to speak to you here in Spanish, German, French, Portuguese, Italian, Hebrew, Yiddish, or Russian, although they may need to switch back to English depending on the subject matter. For a full list of proficiencies, see their User page. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hi!
I’m fairly inexperienced in Wikipedia despite making minor edits for a few years. (I’m a professional editor irl.)
I find the system here to be extremely daunting and non-transparent: Particularly, I’ve truly had trouble navigating the protocol to appeal editorial decisions? I can’t find earlier (archived?) conversations on talk pages, to track the history of issues. I’ve felt intimidated by specific seniors with what I’ve perceived as a dismissive, arrogant “rightness”. I would love some respectful guidance.
thank you.
Chico1112 ( talk) 08:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Good morning @ Rosguill. I believe House of Romay deletion discussion reached community majority, but I also feel it's been abandoned after the initial 4 sockpuppets were blocked, with two new ones popping up and currently reviewed as potential sockpuppets too - this could be endless. As a neutral, and only polyglot admin (that has reviewed Spanish and English info and also voted delete) I thought perhaps you can do the honors. Benzeneshamus ( talk) 15:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I have discussed my previously rejected draft of an article about Michael Beil with the reviewer. It was not an easy process, but I think I managed to address all relevant issues with the article.
During that process, something rather disturbing happened. Michael Beil reached out to me to inform me that he has been contacted by a number of people via email, claiming to be Wikipedia editors and offering him help to get 'his' page published. I read the page about this type of scam and I will report the emails. I wanted to let you know as well.
Best RDiependaele ( talk) 19:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Rosguill. Thanks for giving Lambanilakyanaik a CT alert and a warning that they need to reply about COI/UPE. I don't know if you're aware of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramaprabha1? I actually think L is pretty ripe for an indef, whether or not they're a sock. The edit filter alone... But now that you've warned them, it may of course be as well to wait a bit. A CU is presumably also coming for them. Bishonen | tålk 19:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC).
Okay dude you can stop merging my pages into other ones. Plenty of other airports have pages with that amount of info. Go work on the ones without pages
Jerik.mitchell ( talk) 07:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Rosguill, Sudatel and Sudani aren't the same company; Sudatel is the parent company, and many companies are under it, and Sudani is one of them. So they shouldn't have been in the same article. Ibrahim Old ( talk) 20:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy, in the frame of the conduct of the named parties.To my understanding, other users' behavior is not in this frame and thus out of scope. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
How are you with an unblock on this one, per request on their talk page? Daniel Case ( talk) 07:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, mind having a conversation with this IP about civility given there comments at User talk:BeanieFan11 ( diff)? I don't think it's block worthy but me posting another note on their talk page will unlikely be helpful given I am dork (dorky Karen?) according to them. S0091 ( talk) 18:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | |
For translating so many pages! (I'm also impressed at your ability to sort through the AfD piles. Wow.) ( 3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 00:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill, the redirect Klaudia Gawlas was deleted 4 December 2020. Before my draft Klaudia Gawlas is moved into the mainspace, I wan´t to make sure everything is alright, not to get a conflict with this deletion. Currently the draft is send for review, but will take to long (2 month). I´am sure she is relevant, but I do not know how to move the article into the mainspace. Any ideas or recommendations? Best regards and happy easter on this way. Stephan Tournay ( talk) 15:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
What sources are we actually missing here ? Best regards Migrant ( talk – contribs) 19:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Is there anyway we can protect this article per WP:GS/AA enforcement action? Numerous "new users" continue to disrupt this article. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for stepping in on the Noahide redirect. I don't understand what is meant by "it is a known scam that paid editors will claim affiliation with editors in a deletion discussion and extort money to "prevent the deletion" (which is not something within their power to do)." I have not received any emails from anyone. I suppose the other user who was pushing the Noahide thing as "Anabaptist" felt hurt when his edits were rejected. It seems there is a little group of "Noahide" people, relatively new (last decade or so?), who feel that they belong within the Anabaptist umbrella. That's okay if they feel that way, but until they become large enough to make at minimum a tiny ripple in a movement that includes literally a couple of million people, I have a hard time giving them much room for articles relating to Anabaptism. Mikeatnip ( talk) 00:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, what exactly was the reason to suppress the redirect here? 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Maphumor was reported to ANI “ @Maphumor has been culprit for removing various important things from the page and his past edits has also been criticized of the same. Also many new things have been removed in this page. Please revert the changes made by @maphumor and restore the page. Rkvaishnavp (talk) 7:55 am, Today (UTC+1)” I don’t know them but as you alerted them for the ipa area you may. Their talk page is discouraging. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Rosguill, please look at Ahir clans, Gwalavanshi and Dhadhor. Please remove unreliable raj era sourced information. 2409:4085:8D10:961F:0:0:8889:DB13 ( talk) 21:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
you unbanned my account like a while ago but thanks for being the only one that listened to me :)
Isabpc ( talk) 03:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill, User:Cookiemonster1618 continues to make similar personal attacks that led to a topic ban a few months ago despite previous warning. see his latest [2] previous warnings [3] [4] and ANI discussion [5] Magherbin ( talk) 18:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
So trying to removing the disambiguation link of the Habesha peoples page on the main Harari people page is not very honest of youcould be construed as a mild personal attack; the edit doesn't need to be personalized as "not very honest of you" and could instead be referred to as "misleading" or "incorrect" without assigning blame. That having been said, I don't think this rises to the level of infraction that would motivate me to impose a sanction on the basis of a report at my talk page, unless it can be demonstrated that this is a consistent pattern despite prior warnings. The prior ANI discussion seems to mostly deal with questions of sourcing, not civility, and doesn't seem to establish a precedent of prior warning. signed, Rosguill talk 19:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I would like to invite you to contribute to the discussion on Draft talk:Service Corps of Retired Executives Your learned input would be greatly appreciated. BuffaloBob ( talk) 22:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm wondering why Logoic plane was deleted. Jay 💬 05:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Rosguill I saw you added notability tag to the page AXN Movies (Portugal), saying that that page "needs sources other than AXN and PR"- I would like to ask: What does PR mean? I am a Wikipedia user for only two months, what can I do for keep that page intact? Filippo.g204 ( talk) Filippo.g204 ( talk) 09:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill, could you reopen and/or reclose Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#-) possibly? (I meant to respond to Jeske there.) There was really no reason for -/ and -\ to target different targets, and Emoticon counter to the other consensuses to point these generally at the list of emoticons, I have no idea why this would be different. The !keep votes seem to be more in line with "don't delete" and not people actually supporting the status quo. Let me know your thoughts on this, cheers, Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.. and Emoticon counter ...that is throwing me off. What is the concern with the close? Did you prefer targeting both to Emoticon? Jay 💬 08:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Barkley Marathons on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This user is a polyglot and likes languages a bit too much for their own good. They're happy to try to speak to you here in Spanish, German, French, Portuguese, Italian, Hebrew, Yiddish, or Russian, although they may need to switch back to English depending on the subject matter. For a full list of proficiencies, see their User page. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hi!
I’m fairly inexperienced in Wikipedia despite making minor edits for a few years. (I’m a professional editor irl.)
I find the system here to be extremely daunting and non-transparent: Particularly, I’ve truly had trouble navigating the protocol to appeal editorial decisions? I can’t find earlier (archived?) conversations on talk pages, to track the history of issues. I’ve felt intimidated by specific seniors with what I’ve perceived as a dismissive, arrogant “rightness”. I would love some respectful guidance.
thank you.
Chico1112 ( talk) 08:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Good morning @ Rosguill. I believe House of Romay deletion discussion reached community majority, but I also feel it's been abandoned after the initial 4 sockpuppets were blocked, with two new ones popping up and currently reviewed as potential sockpuppets too - this could be endless. As a neutral, and only polyglot admin (that has reviewed Spanish and English info and also voted delete) I thought perhaps you can do the honors. Benzeneshamus ( talk) 15:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I have discussed my previously rejected draft of an article about Michael Beil with the reviewer. It was not an easy process, but I think I managed to address all relevant issues with the article.
During that process, something rather disturbing happened. Michael Beil reached out to me to inform me that he has been contacted by a number of people via email, claiming to be Wikipedia editors and offering him help to get 'his' page published. I read the page about this type of scam and I will report the emails. I wanted to let you know as well.
Best RDiependaele ( talk) 19:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Rosguill. Thanks for giving Lambanilakyanaik a CT alert and a warning that they need to reply about COI/UPE. I don't know if you're aware of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ramaprabha1? I actually think L is pretty ripe for an indef, whether or not they're a sock. The edit filter alone... But now that you've warned them, it may of course be as well to wait a bit. A CU is presumably also coming for them. Bishonen | tålk 19:26, 29 February 2024 (UTC).
Okay dude you can stop merging my pages into other ones. Plenty of other airports have pages with that amount of info. Go work on the ones without pages
Jerik.mitchell ( talk) 07:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Rosguill, Sudatel and Sudani aren't the same company; Sudatel is the parent company, and many companies are under it, and Sudani is one of them. So they shouldn't have been in the same article. Ibrahim Old ( talk) 20:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Evidence. Please add your evidence by March 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conflict of interest management/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.
For the Arbitration Committee,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 20:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy, in the frame of the conduct of the named parties.To my understanding, other users' behavior is not in this frame and thus out of scope. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 20:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
How are you with an unblock on this one, per request on their talk page? Daniel Case ( talk) 07:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, mind having a conversation with this IP about civility given there comments at User talk:BeanieFan11 ( diff)? I don't think it's block worthy but me posting another note on their talk page will unlikely be helpful given I am dork (dorky Karen?) according to them. S0091 ( talk) 18:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
The Rosetta Barnstar | |
For translating so many pages! (I'm also impressed at your ability to sort through the AfD piles. Wow.) ( 3OpenEyes's talk page. Say hi!) | (PS: Have a good day) 00:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill, the redirect Klaudia Gawlas was deleted 4 December 2020. Before my draft Klaudia Gawlas is moved into the mainspace, I wan´t to make sure everything is alright, not to get a conflict with this deletion. Currently the draft is send for review, but will take to long (2 month). I´am sure she is relevant, but I do not know how to move the article into the mainspace. Any ideas or recommendations? Best regards and happy easter on this way. Stephan Tournay ( talk) 15:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
What sources are we actually missing here ? Best regards Migrant ( talk – contribs) 19:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Is there anyway we can protect this article per WP:GS/AA enforcement action? Numerous "new users" continue to disrupt this article. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 01:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for stepping in on the Noahide redirect. I don't understand what is meant by "it is a known scam that paid editors will claim affiliation with editors in a deletion discussion and extort money to "prevent the deletion" (which is not something within their power to do)." I have not received any emails from anyone. I suppose the other user who was pushing the Noahide thing as "Anabaptist" felt hurt when his edits were rejected. It seems there is a little group of "Noahide" people, relatively new (last decade or so?), who feel that they belong within the Anabaptist umbrella. That's okay if they feel that way, but until they become large enough to make at minimum a tiny ripple in a movement that includes literally a couple of million people, I have a hard time giving them much room for articles relating to Anabaptism. Mikeatnip ( talk) 00:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, what exactly was the reason to suppress the redirect here? 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 11:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Maphumor was reported to ANI “ @Maphumor has been culprit for removing various important things from the page and his past edits has also been criticized of the same. Also many new things have been removed in this page. Please revert the changes made by @maphumor and restore the page. Rkvaishnavp (talk) 7:55 am, Today (UTC+1)” I don’t know them but as you alerted them for the ipa area you may. Their talk page is discouraging. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Rosguill, please look at Ahir clans, Gwalavanshi and Dhadhor. Please remove unreliable raj era sourced information. 2409:4085:8D10:961F:0:0:8889:DB13 ( talk) 21:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
you unbanned my account like a while ago but thanks for being the only one that listened to me :)
Isabpc ( talk) 03:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Rosguill, User:Cookiemonster1618 continues to make similar personal attacks that led to a topic ban a few months ago despite previous warning. see his latest [2] previous warnings [3] [4] and ANI discussion [5] Magherbin ( talk) 18:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
So trying to removing the disambiguation link of the Habesha peoples page on the main Harari people page is not very honest of youcould be construed as a mild personal attack; the edit doesn't need to be personalized as "not very honest of you" and could instead be referred to as "misleading" or "incorrect" without assigning blame. That having been said, I don't think this rises to the level of infraction that would motivate me to impose a sanction on the basis of a report at my talk page, unless it can be demonstrated that this is a consistent pattern despite prior warnings. The prior ANI discussion seems to mostly deal with questions of sourcing, not civility, and doesn't seem to establish a precedent of prior warning. signed, Rosguill talk 19:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I would like to invite you to contribute to the discussion on Draft talk:Service Corps of Retired Executives Your learned input would be greatly appreciated. BuffaloBob ( talk) 22:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I'm wondering why Logoic plane was deleted. Jay 💬 05:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Rosguill I saw you added notability tag to the page AXN Movies (Portugal), saying that that page "needs sources other than AXN and PR"- I would like to ask: What does PR mean? I am a Wikipedia user for only two months, what can I do for keep that page intact? Filippo.g204 ( talk) Filippo.g204 ( talk) 09:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill, could you reopen and/or reclose Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8#-) possibly? (I meant to respond to Jeske there.) There was really no reason for -/ and -\ to target different targets, and Emoticon counter to the other consensuses to point these generally at the list of emoticons, I have no idea why this would be different. The !keep votes seem to be more in line with "don't delete" and not people actually supporting the status quo. Let me know your thoughts on this, cheers, Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
.. and Emoticon counter ...that is throwing me off. What is the concern with the close? Did you prefer targeting both to Emoticon? Jay 💬 08:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Barkley Marathons on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)