This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 8, 2024.
No mention of "EduTok" portmanteau at the target page, nor are there mentions of "edutok" anywhere on Wikipedia as a whole. No content about this subtopic means this redirect is not helpful. People who want to read about TikTok would have searched that directly instead of EduTok, and its existence as a redirect implies we have something about EduTok which we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Echo", "Ranch", "Bible", nor "Camp". Was created as a redirect by the closing admin of its AfD (after deleting the rest of the history??). The AfD, bearing in mind, received 6 votes to delete, 2 to merge, 2 to keep, yet not a soul suggested to redirect it without a mention, but that's exactly how the AfD was closed as. It looks like the admin deleted the page, created it again as a redirect, and said that "nothing is worth merging, but feel free to add it to Auke Bay, Juneau if you want". Nothing was added. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Drinkin About You" at the target page, nor are there any mentions of this title on Wikipedia. Seems to be a song, but is never alluded to in the text; we don't have content about it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching
There are no disputed kings or queens at the target article. "King" appears never, "Queen" appears once, "Disputed" appears never. Existed for 2 weeks in May 2005 as a list of 10 names created in one edit with no other context. This was apparently merged, but I don't see any trace of any of these names even by July 2005? Does not seem to be needed or useful nearly 20 years later. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco
No mentions of "cut fingering" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. The page for this fingering does not make any mentions or references to "cut", external searches are primarily about cut(s) and finger(s). Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals
No mentions of "chief" at the target page. While harbourmasters do have the ability to be [chief] harbourmasters, mentions of this term on Wikipedia can be navigated like so: "Person X was the chief harbourmaster, who...". There wouldn't be a need to add "chief" to the title itself, as we have no content about chief harbourmasters on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. Was tagged as A11 immediately but was converted into a redirect as an alternative to deletion. This phrase bears no intentional mentions on all of Wikipedia. People who want to search for the cologne would be using the title of the cologne, not the act of applying it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs
No mention of "Brain sex" at target article. Without a definition at the page, this becomes confusing, especially so with the existence of a Brain Sex redirect, which exists for a topic that we do have content on. Because this seemingly isn't covered/defined anywhere else on Wikipedia at this time (besides content about "brain/sex differences", an entirely different topic), this should either be a redirect back to David Jessel#Publications (which is where it targeted from 2009 to 2021) or a red link to encourage article development. Or content added somewhere. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce
The title "academic school" is not mentioned at the target. People searching for Plato's Academy have a plethora of more viable redirects, than something as generic as "academic school". If never referred to as this, this doesn't seem helpful.
Schools seem to generally be academic by default? With a variety of schools at School (disambiguation) about all sorts of non-academic topics, someone might try to specific "academic school" as a specific adjective to end up at School. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a code of laws presumably associated with the Borgarthings thing. Not mentioned in the article. I expect it would be appropriate to add, but while not present the redirect is confusing. Mentioned briefly at Blót, but I don't think redirecting there is appropriate either, as it's just given as an example in a list. Rusalkii ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This title was created by a banned user for a supposed batch of episodes for the target indicated, which later turned out to be a series of shorts. Half a decade later, this title serves no purpose as it's currently and merely a redundant redirect, so requesting deletion. Intrisit ( talk) 16:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The word "delete" is only mentioned once in passing, never with an exclamation point, and never referred to as a possible chant of such word. Because the word "delete" is very often stated on its own, as a command verb, this stylization I feel can be used in many other contexts present on the Delete disambiguation page. There is currently not a strong justification from the Cyberman article's content to prioritize this usage over the others. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking
A vague name that is not mentioned at the target page, yet can reasonably imply other punctuation topics. The history is possibly the most 2005 of them all, created in 6 edits by an editors' only 6 edits. However, it has dubious usefulness as a redirect here. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
:]
or :[
, which can indeed be emoticons, but I'm not sure this 'spelling out' of an emoticon is a useful and plausible search term? ...What, is it meant for people searching for emoticons using speech to text?? (6_9)
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk) 12:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 08:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to try to get firmer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not a correct spelling without diacritics (which will be Muehlhausen). This is not a popular misspelling either, Mullhausen is usually a family name. WP:R#DELETE #8 or #2. Викидим ( talk) 04:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 07:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
After the merging of Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restoration of the previous target - Luxury real estate, may not be an option per the recently concluded DRV. We have so far only one vote suggesting targetting all to Real estate "for now" probably pending the discussion of Luxury real estate, but with that now out of the way, we can re-view this RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirection is inappropriate. "Preservation of the saints" is a process that can intervene in various theological scheme : it can be conditional and then refers to conditional preservation of the saints, or "unconditional" and then refers to Perseverance of the saints and may referred to Eternal security. However, "Preservation of the saint" is absolutely not used as a substitute for "eternal security" in common language. Telikalive ( talk) 13:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk) 16:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A theme song mentioned once at the target. Not enough substance to warrant a redirect and not the primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be a useful redirect. Has previously been tagged for R3. BangJan1999 00:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia
Useless redirect. We never have articles for failed candidates unless they are notable, not even as redirects to the seat they failed to win. If we do have articles for failed candidates who haven't been elected to any office prior to failing to be elected then again they have to be notable (e.g Katherine Deves is notable because of her outspoken controversial views and her political activism, plus her preselection itself was controversial). Sam Boughton isn't notable and he was Labor's unsuccessful candidate for Terrigal (a seat the Liberals retained). I'm not sure why this article was even created in the first place but I think it should be deleted per notability guidelines and for consistency with every other article. 37.0.81.236 ( talk) 23:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
days=n
parameter of the rfd template to do this automatically, n is number of days before the current day the redirect was nominated, e.g. for to tag a redirect nominated yesterday (or to add a redirect to a discussion on yesterday's page) use {{subst:rfd|days=1|content=...
.
Thryduulf (
talk) 03:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes ( talk / cont) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of emoticons with unexpectedly different targets. Using semicolons as eyes, but switching the mouth style, does not seem logical to have a difference in topics here, between the list and the general page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 15:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of two emoticons, and in this case I'm really not seeing why :') would go one way and :'( would go the other. Utopes ( talk / cont) 15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to determine why this redirects here: there is no mention in the article. Spanish wiki has an article but English wiki articles Los Lagos, Chile and Los Lagos Region don't mention it. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I can't work out why this redirect points to this article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, a fictional... rock apparently, from a series of books. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92
First page or so of Google search results entirely about the cofounder and new CEO of Alibaba Group Eddie Yongming Wu, who we don't have a page on. He's mentioned very briefly in the main page, where he is linked as Eddie Wu, which also redirects to this martial artist. Likely should have a page, but in the meantime this redirect is highly confusing and should be deleted (and probably Eddie Wu as well. Rusalkii ( talk) 04:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, or retarget to the new stub at
Eddie Wu?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm not convinced the current target is the true primary topic over John Bullock Clark; John Bullock Clark Jr. is also a factor as well. The best outcome here would be to dabify. I would do this myself but the current redirect is from 2004 and has always had the current target so I would like more eyes on this before making the change. It's been a couple years since I was frequently active at RFD, so apologies if dabification requests are no longer considered within the norm here. Hog Farm Talk 00:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambiguate (dabify) or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The creator of this redirect created this among over 20 others pointing to the now deleted page, "Where is Kate?" All but a couple of these have now been deleted under WP:G8 because the target was deleted. But in this case, I felt that this redirect (and one other) were reasonable search terms that should redirect to Catherine, Princess of Wales#Health, and made that change. However, this one is problematic, because the creator of the redirect twice copied in the page history from the deleted article and immediately reverted it on this page. This page history therefore contains a WP:COPYWITHIN (one of which had to be repaired) from a deleted page, and the terms of the attribution license may not be met, as the attribution has now been deleted for everyone except for admins. I would not object to this being deleted and immediately recreated, but I do think the redirect should be deleted. I note that while I felt the redirect was reasonable, it is certainly not necessary. Anyone trying to type this text into search will find the target article before they finish typing, and if they search the full name without a redirect, the target page will be the first hit. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
reasonablebut also that it
should be deleted and immediately recreated. Applying Occam's razor, it seems to be the easiest solution here is just to keep it, perhaps as an {{ R with history}}. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 16:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "Hall" at the target article in capacity, much less a "Food Hall", even much less a "Central Food Hall" no less. Currently not a helpful redirect to a target that is already twinkle-tagged to the brim, even after securing an illustrious central title. Has a couple other unmentioned redirects too from a presumably removed section.
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 03:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The suffix of "ness" does not appear at the target article, and by extension neither does "Bitness". Without a definition this term does not currently feel like a great fit as a redirect. "Bitness" has mentions across wikipedia in various scenarios, and also a Wikt:bitness entry, but perhaps staying on WP-side is more preferable for this term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
the property of using a specific number of bits. For example, a single-precision integer and a double-precision integer differ in bitness. Bloomsbury's Dictionary of Computing appears to also have an entry, but I couldn't verify directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradoctor ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A term not mentioned at the target disambiguation page. In an effort to possibly boldly retarget, I confirmed that "antiscarp" was not mentioned at any of the pages listed at the dab. It was not. I searched onwiki for any mentions of "antiscarp", and the only related definition I could find was two pages that said "antiscarp, or an uphill- scarplet". Great! So I just have to target antiscarp to wherever scarplet points! I search that, and "scarplet" is an unmentioned redirect to the same disambiguation page. No use of "scarplet" at any of the linked pages either. Basically, this is a circular cross-definition of scarplet and antiscarp, only used to refer to each other, point at the same disambiguation, and are unmentioned everywhere else on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would it be feasible to soft redirect both to Wiktionary?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable
I was surprised by this redirect because a thing does not have to be a chaotic system (in the sense of chaos theory) to be "disorganized". Maybe retarget to wiktionary? (I was hoping we had an article on the general concept of chaos, but I don't think we do.) Duckmather ( talk) 06:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Was created as a duplicate article in one edit, converted into a redirect in the next (by the person who was creating the set of pages for this album). There does not seem to be any history worth salvaging from this implausible redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of lowest viewed redirects that are missing a closing parenthesis. None of these titles have an affinity for missing parentheses, making this batch unpredictable and implausible to seek and spell. None of these titles have substansive history, and have never contained content. They have only existed as redirects. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 8, 2024.
No mention of "EduTok" portmanteau at the target page, nor are there mentions of "edutok" anywhere on Wikipedia as a whole. No content about this subtopic means this redirect is not helpful. People who want to read about TikTok would have searched that directly instead of EduTok, and its existence as a redirect implies we have something about EduTok which we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Echo", "Ranch", "Bible", nor "Camp". Was created as a redirect by the closing admin of its AfD (after deleting the rest of the history??). The AfD, bearing in mind, received 6 votes to delete, 2 to merge, 2 to keep, yet not a soul suggested to redirect it without a mention, but that's exactly how the AfD was closed as. It looks like the admin deleted the page, created it again as a redirect, and said that "nothing is worth merging, but feel free to add it to Auke Bay, Juneau if you want". Nothing was added. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Drinkin About You" at the target page, nor are there any mentions of this title on Wikipedia. Seems to be a song, but is never alluded to in the text; we don't have content about it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching
There are no disputed kings or queens at the target article. "King" appears never, "Queen" appears once, "Disputed" appears never. Existed for 2 weeks in May 2005 as a list of 10 names created in one edit with no other context. This was apparently merged, but I don't see any trace of any of these names even by July 2005? Does not seem to be needed or useful nearly 20 years later. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco
No mentions of "cut fingering" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. The page for this fingering does not make any mentions or references to "cut", external searches are primarily about cut(s) and finger(s). Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals
No mentions of "chief" at the target page. While harbourmasters do have the ability to be [chief] harbourmasters, mentions of this term on Wikipedia can be navigated like so: "Person X was the chief harbourmaster, who...". There wouldn't be a need to add "chief" to the title itself, as we have no content about chief harbourmasters on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. Was tagged as A11 immediately but was converted into a redirect as an alternative to deletion. This phrase bears no intentional mentions on all of Wikipedia. People who want to search for the cologne would be using the title of the cologne, not the act of applying it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs
No mention of "Brain sex" at target article. Without a definition at the page, this becomes confusing, especially so with the existence of a Brain Sex redirect, which exists for a topic that we do have content on. Because this seemingly isn't covered/defined anywhere else on Wikipedia at this time (besides content about "brain/sex differences", an entirely different topic), this should either be a redirect back to David Jessel#Publications (which is where it targeted from 2009 to 2021) or a red link to encourage article development. Or content added somewhere. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce
The title "academic school" is not mentioned at the target. People searching for Plato's Academy have a plethora of more viable redirects, than something as generic as "academic school". If never referred to as this, this doesn't seem helpful.
Schools seem to generally be academic by default? With a variety of schools at School (disambiguation) about all sorts of non-academic topics, someone might try to specific "academic school" as a specific adjective to end up at School. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Appears to be a code of laws presumably associated with the Borgarthings thing. Not mentioned in the article. I expect it would be appropriate to add, but while not present the redirect is confusing. Mentioned briefly at Blót, but I don't think redirecting there is appropriate either, as it's just given as an example in a list. Rusalkii ( talk) 17:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This title was created by a banned user for a supposed batch of episodes for the target indicated, which later turned out to be a series of shorts. Half a decade later, this title serves no purpose as it's currently and merely a redundant redirect, so requesting deletion. Intrisit ( talk) 16:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The word "delete" is only mentioned once in passing, never with an exclamation point, and never referred to as a possible chant of such word. Because the word "delete" is very often stated on its own, as a command verb, this stylization I feel can be used in many other contexts present on the Delete disambiguation page. There is currently not a strong justification from the Cyberman article's content to prioritize this usage over the others. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking
A vague name that is not mentioned at the target page, yet can reasonably imply other punctuation topics. The history is possibly the most 2005 of them all, created in 6 edits by an editors' only 6 edits. However, it has dubious usefulness as a redirect here. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
:]
or :[
, which can indeed be emoticons, but I'm not sure this 'spelling out' of an emoticon is a useful and plausible search term? ...What, is it meant for people searching for emoticons using speech to text?? (6_9)
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk) 12:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 08:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to try to get firmer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not a correct spelling without diacritics (which will be Muehlhausen). This is not a popular misspelling either, Mullhausen is usually a family name. WP:R#DELETE #8 or #2. Викидим ( talk) 04:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 07:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
After the merging of Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restoration of the previous target - Luxury real estate, may not be an option per the recently concluded DRV. We have so far only one vote suggesting targetting all to Real estate "for now" probably pending the discussion of Luxury real estate, but with that now out of the way, we can re-view this RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirection is inappropriate. "Preservation of the saints" is a process that can intervene in various theological scheme : it can be conditional and then refers to conditional preservation of the saints, or "unconditional" and then refers to Perseverance of the saints and may referred to Eternal security. However, "Preservation of the saint" is absolutely not used as a substitute for "eternal security" in common language. Telikalive ( talk) 13:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Duckmather (
talk) 16:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A theme song mentioned once at the target. Not enough substance to warrant a redirect and not the primary topic. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be a useful redirect. Has previously been tagged for R3. BangJan1999 00:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia
Useless redirect. We never have articles for failed candidates unless they are notable, not even as redirects to the seat they failed to win. If we do have articles for failed candidates who haven't been elected to any office prior to failing to be elected then again they have to be notable (e.g Katherine Deves is notable because of her outspoken controversial views and her political activism, plus her preselection itself was controversial). Sam Boughton isn't notable and he was Labor's unsuccessful candidate for Terrigal (a seat the Liberals retained). I'm not sure why this article was even created in the first place but I think it should be deleted per notability guidelines and for consistency with every other article. 37.0.81.236 ( talk) 23:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
days=n
parameter of the rfd template to do this automatically, n is number of days before the current day the redirect was nominated, e.g. for to tag a redirect nominated yesterday (or to add a redirect to a discussion on yesterday's page) use {{subst:rfd|days=1|content=...
.
Thryduulf (
talk) 03:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes ( talk / cont) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of emoticons with unexpectedly different targets. Using semicolons as eyes, but switching the mouth style, does not seem logical to have a difference in topics here, between the list and the general page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 15:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of two emoticons, and in this case I'm really not seeing why :') would go one way and :'( would go the other. Utopes ( talk / cont) 15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to determine why this redirects here: there is no mention in the article. Spanish wiki has an article but English wiki articles Los Lagos, Chile and Los Lagos Region don't mention it. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I can't work out why this redirect points to this article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 10:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article, a fictional... rock apparently, from a series of books. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92
First page or so of Google search results entirely about the cofounder and new CEO of Alibaba Group Eddie Yongming Wu, who we don't have a page on. He's mentioned very briefly in the main page, where he is linked as Eddie Wu, which also redirects to this martial artist. Likely should have a page, but in the meantime this redirect is highly confusing and should be deleted (and probably Eddie Wu as well. Rusalkii ( talk) 04:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, or retarget to the new stub at
Eddie Wu?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm not convinced the current target is the true primary topic over John Bullock Clark; John Bullock Clark Jr. is also a factor as well. The best outcome here would be to dabify. I would do this myself but the current redirect is from 2004 and has always had the current target so I would like more eyes on this before making the change. It's been a couple years since I was frequently active at RFD, so apologies if dabification requests are no longer considered within the norm here. Hog Farm Talk 00:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambiguate (dabify) or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The creator of this redirect created this among over 20 others pointing to the now deleted page, "Where is Kate?" All but a couple of these have now been deleted under WP:G8 because the target was deleted. But in this case, I felt that this redirect (and one other) were reasonable search terms that should redirect to Catherine, Princess of Wales#Health, and made that change. However, this one is problematic, because the creator of the redirect twice copied in the page history from the deleted article and immediately reverted it on this page. This page history therefore contains a WP:COPYWITHIN (one of which had to be repaired) from a deleted page, and the terms of the attribution license may not be met, as the attribution has now been deleted for everyone except for admins. I would not object to this being deleted and immediately recreated, but I do think the redirect should be deleted. I note that while I felt the redirect was reasonable, it is certainly not necessary. Anyone trying to type this text into search will find the target article before they finish typing, and if they search the full name without a redirect, the target page will be the first hit. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
reasonablebut also that it
should be deleted and immediately recreated. Applying Occam's razor, it seems to be the easiest solution here is just to keep it, perhaps as an {{ R with history}}. Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 16:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "Hall" at the target article in capacity, much less a "Food Hall", even much less a "Central Food Hall" no less. Currently not a helpful redirect to a target that is already twinkle-tagged to the brim, even after securing an illustrious central title. Has a couple other unmentioned redirects too from a presumably removed section.
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 03:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The suffix of "ness" does not appear at the target article, and by extension neither does "Bitness". Without a definition this term does not currently feel like a great fit as a redirect. "Bitness" has mentions across wikipedia in various scenarios, and also a Wikt:bitness entry, but perhaps staying on WP-side is more preferable for this term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
the property of using a specific number of bits. For example, a single-precision integer and a double-precision integer differ in bitness. Bloomsbury's Dictionary of Computing appears to also have an entry, but I couldn't verify directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradoctor ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
A term not mentioned at the target disambiguation page. In an effort to possibly boldly retarget, I confirmed that "antiscarp" was not mentioned at any of the pages listed at the dab. It was not. I searched onwiki for any mentions of "antiscarp", and the only related definition I could find was two pages that said "antiscarp, or an uphill- scarplet". Great! So I just have to target antiscarp to wherever scarplet points! I search that, and "scarplet" is an unmentioned redirect to the same disambiguation page. No use of "scarplet" at any of the linked pages either. Basically, this is a circular cross-definition of scarplet and antiscarp, only used to refer to each other, point at the same disambiguation, and are unmentioned everywhere else on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would it be feasible to soft redirect both to Wiktionary?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable
I was surprised by this redirect because a thing does not have to be a chaotic system (in the sense of chaos theory) to be "disorganized". Maybe retarget to wiktionary? (I was hoping we had an article on the general concept of chaos, but I don't think we do.) Duckmather ( talk) 06:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Was created as a duplicate article in one edit, converted into a redirect in the next (by the person who was creating the set of pages for this album). There does not seem to be any history worth salvaging from this implausible redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Another set of lowest viewed redirects that are missing a closing parenthesis. None of these titles have an affinity for missing parentheses, making this batch unpredictable and implausible to seek and spell. None of these titles have substansive history, and have never contained content. They have only existed as redirects. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)