I have hunted out my login details (not the easiest of tasks) as I find myself doing more than wiki-gnoming lately and guess I should therefore actually log in.
I claim these edits back to early 2016: /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/212.159.115.41
Thanks all for the kind messages on this talk page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
From Canada [1], with love :) You see, some things never change. – Austronesier ( talk) 10:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Appy polly lodges for my revert on that page. I misunderstood that section and thought withdrawn meant Kubrick 'ad pulled it from circulation and banned copies of it. Sammy of thee to offer me an explanation, I viddy thee now :) Stephanie921 ( talk) 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For your rationale and measured tone when discussing differences with fellow editors. Lightburst ( talk) 23:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
Croeso, a diolch. Beth sydd i mi a wnelwyf a "Horeston Grange Deviation"? - ! Eebahgum ( talk) 18:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
You wrote on
WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_3#Arupa:
[...]You are making arupa something it is not.[...]
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 14:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Sirfurboy. Ban evasion by whom? You can e-mail me if you prefer. Bishonen | tålk 08:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC).
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Croydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallington.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your help on this page. Much appreciated. Titus Gold ( talk) 22:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | |
No hard feelings. I value your disagreement Curbon7 ( talk) 18:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for sorting out the protected areas. I'll take your word for it that they can't be expanded. Some you can expand to start class but I am aware that there are a lot of duds. Try to avoid mass templating me on my talk page though! :-) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
You might be interested in this project that Joe has invited me to. It's intended to be taylored for archaelogical articles, but I'm thinking of a similar guide for archaeogenetic articles in general. Though I'm still waiting for Tewdar to recover from his Halloween hangover before starting with it :) Austronesier ( talk) 21:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Austronesier & Sirfurboy: thanks for the pings and humorous characterisations, although I'm actually immune to hangovers, and self-identify as a hoodlum, not a reprobate 😀. I've been a bit overwhelmed for a couple of weeks, but should be back in action in a couple of days hopefully. I'm looking forward to editing with you both again. All the best, Tewdar 09:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Should I undo my PROD as you've improved the article? Thanks, Knitsey ( talk) 21:57, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 22:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sirfurboy. Thought I'd take this to your talk page, as it makes more sense than continuing the same discussion across talk pages (and angry edit summaries!) on the many articles we've both made the same sorts of edits to.
Having logged back into Wikipedia after a week offline, I see you've been continuing to go through Greater London area articles that mention their relevant historic county in the lead. In some cases you've removed mention of the relevant historic county altogether ( [9] [10] [11] [12]) for example. In others you have removed mention of "historic county" and the article instead reads that the place was once in a county ( [13] [14] for example). In others you have written that the place "was in the historic county" "until 1965" ( [15] [16] [17] [18] for example).
We both know that it was my edits to the Croydon article that triggered your edits across Greater London area articles...and your edits triggered a series of edits from me across Greater London articles. Rather than us following each other around, leaving angry talk page replies/edit summaries, and changing each other's edits to achieve our preferred wording, I thought we'd be better off discussing anything historic county-related in the same place. Hopefully this will bring some calm to what has been a rather heated disagreement! PlatinumClipper96 ( talk) 00:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, Sirfurboy🏄 for resolving this issue and getting noticeable editors banned by the Admin-board. I left WP for nearly 2 years because of the endless edit wars by this user, to force HC into the lead. WP:NOTHERE was certainly qualified by years of bold edits whose only reason was to claim HC still exist with the same importance of those estibalished in 1965. Thank you, so much! 81.98.196.96 ( talk) 12:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! This is a courtesy note that, following your request at WP:RFCLOSE, I have closed a proposed merge discussion on the talk page of Gallic Wars. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you have reverted some of my recent assessments in WP Wales. Can we discuss? I may be persuaded by your opinion, but your reverts have also removed the articles from the WP Wales project in some cases rather than just disagreeing with the assessment. I've done 1000s over the past few days, and I'm sure they will not all be right (and it's subjective), but I have found there are very many Stub tags in articles that are no longer justifiable vs a Start assessment category on the Talk page. welsh ( talk) 20:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Sirfurboy, just for transparency, I have made additions of my text that previously featured in "Welsh dragon" to Carnyx and European dragon. Thanks Titus Gold ( talk) 18:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Sirfurboy. You may be interested in the following drafts, Draft:St Brynach Cross and Draft:Penmon crosses. I've been looking to create pages for notable Welsh artefacts, particularly ones that have relatively consistent names e.g Mold Cape, Moel Hebog, Nanteos Cup etc and using the category "Welsh artefacts", which I have also added to pre-existing articles. Titus Gold ( talk) 12:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
V (Vlang) ( Wukuendo) 09:29, March 13 2023 (UTC)
I probably butchered that! Where about in Wales are you based/from? I'm an expat Scot in Ceredigion. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
You seem to be making confrontational edits and seem to be targeting any proposals I make. There is no real logic behind keeping List of ports in England and Wales and it seems as though you have an agenda of keeping "England and Wales" formats wherever you can, suggesting a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view concern. Please try to be more constructive rather than confrontational and frustrating discussions with unnecessary processes. Titus Gold ( talk) 17:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
You may have noticed I've nominated English rule in Wales to Afd. I thought I should formally notify you, because I notice to made a lot of edits last month in an attempt to improve the article. The AfD discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English rule in Wales. Sionk ( talk) 19:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Purley, London you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie ( talk) 20:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ethnicity. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Both of you are edit warring and need to discuss on the talk page. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Purley, London you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Purley, London for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie ( talk) 14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't want to get into an editing war and would appreciate your guidance and opinion. Please see the discussion on the talk page regarding cannabis under the heading personal life. I removed a statement after concern about it was raised and explained the reasons. The person who wrote the statement put the reference back in minutes later. If you feel I should have left the statement I will leave the reinserted statement about using cannabis when younger in. If you think it is something that might be an issue, could you please help me avoid a war. I did read one of the messages on this page that said it's possible to post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Where and how do I do this? Kiwatts ( talk) 21:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
You are incorrect in your edit re Buckinghamshire and the 12 plus. It was called the 12 plus in Buckinghamshire from the 1960's until the 1990's and the Hansard link was the discussion in Parliament re changing the 12 plus to the 11 plus in 1995/1996. ( Mabbs001 ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)) Mabbs001 ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
No need to apologise - and also I wasn't meaning to discount the need for further investigation. Just that there could be other explanations too. Although - I'm not entirely sure what the practical options are for investigating it further are. Btw, thanks and well done for biting the bullet and opening that thread. It's crossed my mind to do it a few times, but successfully getting across WP:CPUSH at that venue is not easy. DeCausa ( talk) 22:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Street Bird. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
A brief note of thanks for bringing this to ANI. That forum can be a challenging place, and you have done myself, other editors and the Wales pages a considerable service. Hopefully, a period away from the Welsh area will enable TG to reflect, and begin to understand why their editing was of such concern to a wide range of editors. At least, one can live in hope. KJP1 ( talk) 10:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
I was about to say the same thing. Thanks for pulling things together to raise the issue formally. It needed to happen, judging from the huge animosity expressed from such a broad range of editors. Such a shame the small number of useful and constructive edits were dwarfed by the problematic ones. Amser i fynd ymlaen. Sionk ( talk) 16:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your reversal of my edit just now, I am Irish, have lived in England, (primarily London), for the past 49 years. I've even taught English for a time. My favourite poet is Dylan Thomas, (for his lyricism), and my first my first wife was Welsh, ergo you can be certain I know British English, including cockney, as spoken in the four countries of the realm. Nobody in Britain with any reasonable education says "had got"; it's either "got" or "had gotten". I note Google attributes "gotten" to North American English, but look it up in the Cambridge or Oxford dictionaries and you'll see I'm right. Mark Dask 14:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
, but look at the dates on these. None of these are modern except one that is from an American source. So yes, it was correct, but is it considered correct now? Well Fowler tells me (and I checked this out before reversing your edit):1653 H. Holcroft tr. Procopius War with Vandals ii. 46 in tr. Procopius Hist. Warres Justinian Maximinus..had gotten many of those mutiners with a design to usurp.
- that from Pocket Fowler, Second edition, page 42. Also page 45. And indeed page 308 which says:Some of the more significant differences are due to uses that disappeared in BrE but survived in AmE (such as the use of gotten as a past participle of get, and the use of theater and other spellings in -er)
gotten. 1 Few uses mark out the Americanness of a person more readily than their natural use of got and gotten as alternative past participles of get. (These uses are also spreading to Australia and New Zealand, as some of the examples given below will show.) Gotten is no longer used in Britain (except in ill- gotten), although it was once in regular use.
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Hello. Using the information you provided in your corrected edit of mine, on the 11th. July, at 06:59, of my citing Lewisham as Edward Lanchesters's place of birth, (which I, in my turn, took from his page because it was stated by someone unknown to me), I've now put your provided information on Lanchesters's own page, and cited you in the Edit Summary as the information's provider). Thanks. Heath St John ( talk) 16:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod blp}} tag from Johnnie Lynn, which you proposed for deletion, as the article now includes one or more sources. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion with a regular {{ prod}} or via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! –– FormalDude (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sirfurboy.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, i am trying to add some useful clues for the decryption of Linear-A using Dolkos' work. I used external links for the pictures of a pin and a ring which i describe specificaly (museum item number etc.) Was it the only error ? I need you to please specify what made you delete my additions so i fix them and do it properly. Thank you. 109.242.96.37 ( talk) 18:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
You moved text added by @
Hogyncymru: from
Welsh dragon to
Flag of Wales as the text is about the flag and not the dragon per se
. I think it was right to move it, but is it even about the actual flag itself? I wonder if the text in question really belongs somewhere like
Welsh nationalism?
Dorsetonian (
talk) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Sirfurboy, I know we are all busy, so please don't take this the wrong way. It's not referring to just you, but what had been going on previously. You have also given me (and others) lots of guidance, so you have my full respect. By the way, really don't like to be forced into the edit battle on V, because want to look at other programming language pages that are in draft.
Yet, another aspect about this issue is the continous visible errors left on the article. Seeing them just left there, also pulls me in, as belive how an article looks (any article) is important too. I think what was done were just editing mistakes, but it has happened so many times, I'm really not sure at this point. Weird spacing, visible formatting problems, inconsistent or conflicting information or odd wording being shown, misspellings, tags, etc... It gives the impression that those who might be "opposed" to it or at least someone else's version of it, are so hasty to revert or tear down the work of others, that they don't care about the state or quality in which the article is left in. Just saying, please look at this aspect of the debate too. I'm trying to leave at least a presentable article, that the public can read. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Wukuendo ( talk) 02:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Horst_Wessel".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
47.219.237.179 ( talk) 21:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I hadn't sen a ref cited like that before in all my years here. Can you bring up another example? I'm not doubting it in any way just it'd be very useful for at least a few articles. Would the rp template also work in the context of chapters or is there a separate one there for such? Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Dank
Jae is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Dank Jae 09:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
As mentioned in : /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grsecurity : Could you add the non-compliance with the GPL2 and the lawsuit section to one of the GPL articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.196.239 ( talk) 01:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
I'll pass, thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)14:47, 31 December 2023 Aoidh talk contribs blocked 24.186.196.239 talk with an expiration time of 31 hours (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Block evasion)
Shwmae! I've reverted and changed slightly the IPA for Penparcau to reflect the Standard Welsh pronunciation (as opposed to colloquial pronunciation). However, I am not at all dogmatic about this, and the colloquial pronuncuation is very common, so I think one could argue both ways. Either way, I'm happy for it to be whatever the consensus is :)
The only one I'd not really give weight is the less common Anglicized 'pen-park-ee' pronunciation.
Diolch, a dymuniadau gorau 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:859:8379:EBEB:EF99 ( talk) 20:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Just asking and speculating, but do the sources comments (aside ours) at Talk:Snowdonia#Request to rename page to Welsh name Eryri being the dominant., and Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Bannau Brycheiniog name look similar? I get the impression, although not concrete in such accusation with such weak evidence, and not willing to escalate it from my side. But find it odd for a new single-edit editor to just have it suddenly prepared. Could indeed be someone new, but still odd. Not encouraging anything further unless you wish, nor wish for it to be seen as censoring the other side.
Also while we're on the topic, still not forgotten the bunch of students? all appearing at the same time at teaching of Welsh history, then completely disappearing within a few days of each other. But could be legitimate but still odd. Ofc, they do not seem to have caused any disruption afterwards. Dank Jae 13:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello again! I was wondering if you had the time, if you could take a look at our conversation & consensus to see if i closed everything correctly per the Wikipedia rules. Thank you! Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 17:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to salvage the page :) Back in September it was a nice article, now it's a promotional mess... Broc ( talk) 17:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
You are the greatest. Thanks for your diplomacy early on and for your patience and willingness to help and teach a newbie. I have been studying and even learned wikitext. I'm currently having fun and learning new things while working on the Unreferenced Articles WikiProject. Thank you!
Kiwatts (
talk) 01:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit I had made, correctly I assume, to fix a harv no-target error. However, the error returned because a footnote points to Rasmussen 1988. Thanks. Andy02124 ( talk) 15:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello!
I just wanted to ask what your plan was with the whole county flags discussion. I know the topic can be a bit tiring, but now that there's some momentum I'm quite keen to try and find a resolution. The status quo is clearly not going to hold in the long-term, so we'd just be kicking the can to let the current discussion die out. A.D.Hope ( talk) 09:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You seem like a reasonable person. Could you read the latest discussion on Stephen C. Meyer’s talk page where we are discussing the opposite of what I am recommending for Ken Ham? While I think Ken Ham deserves the term “Pseudoscientist”, I think that Stephen Meyer deserves the opposite where he has been listed as such, and I think that people are emotionally involved there, and I need someone who can take a look without their emotion in the way.
FYI: it’s a long read 😳 Chrisallen87 ( talk) 23:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
He is an advocate of the pseudoscience of intelligent design. Not because I don't think ID is pseudoscientific. It is almost classically pseudoscientific, and the reason this is necessarily so comes down to the whole philosophy and epistemological basis of science. You can argue with the epistemology of science itself (c.f. Gordon Clark who argues against empiricism) but you can't say ID is scientific as science is defined. The reason I don't like that lead is because it is making an up front judgement in a lead that is supposed to be a summary. I'd think "He is an advocate of intelligent design" is sufficient, and especially as the wikilink takes the reader to a page that explains why ID is pseudoscientific. That would, in my view, read more neutrally. I suspect it would take a lot of work to remove the word though - the label "pseudoscientific" tends to engender long debates. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I dunno how I missed what it said on that article about Malkinson not being freed as he didn't confess lol. Cheers for correcting 82.18.162.80 ( talk) 16:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is A Wider Lens. Thank you. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 17:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Sirfurboy, I hope your day is well.
I'm new to Wikipedia editing, having come here to provide greater knowledge to the world through my cache of source information on a narrow range of topics. I recognize that you are an experienced editor and ask your guidance on my "Latter Rain David Schoch" edit.
I understand that the cited non-fiction book is independently published, which is by-and-large frowned upon (and for good reason in many cases). However, please hear my argument for reverting to include this particular non-fiction book.
1) The non-fiction book referencing David Schoch and his church "Bethany Chapel" is a first-hand account of events from a currently living person who attended that church and interacted with David Schoch. It is a true story and identifies itself as such.
2) Wikipedia contains virtually no information on Latter Rain's David Schoch or his church Bethany Chapel.
3) I've uploaded source audio from David Schoch's Bethany Chapel church to YouTube, with further uploads in the works. The audio comes direct from Bethany Chapel (which hasn't existed in over 25 years). I possess audio cassettes from Bethany Chapel, complete with original labeling.
4) I've been cited in university-published scholarly research. I can provide further detail if that will sway you towards including my edit on David Schoch / Bethany Chapel, although I prefer remaining anonymous.
I ask that you consider these points and if you still disagree with reverting to include this non-fiction book as citation / bibliography, please let me know the best course of action to pass my knowledge of David Schoch / Bethany Chapel to Wikipedia and the world.
Thank you Sirfurboy and I look forward to your reply. APCMDG ( talk) 05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Monadic plane has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Monadic plane until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I guess that's some kind of Cornish insult, then?? Martinevans123 ( talk) 10:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Just to drop a note to say that this essay is, very much, as you might have suspected, a write-up of your !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination). I thought it was a very clear and valuable contribution to that discussion, and one I've found myself using in subsequent discussions, so I thought it was worth an essay :)) IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 16:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! WP:ANI#Talk:Ceredigion. Summer92 ( talk) 09:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I have hunted out my login details (not the easiest of tasks) as I find myself doing more than wiki-gnoming lately and guess I should therefore actually log in.
I claim these edits back to early 2016: /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/212.159.115.41
Thanks all for the kind messages on this talk page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:51, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
From Canada [1], with love :) You see, some things never change. – Austronesier ( talk) 10:32, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Appy polly lodges for my revert on that page. I misunderstood that section and thought withdrawn meant Kubrick 'ad pulled it from circulation and banned copies of it. Sammy of thee to offer me an explanation, I viddy thee now :) Stephanie921 ( talk) 15:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For your rationale and measured tone when discussing differences with fellow editors. Lightburst ( talk) 23:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC) |
Croeso, a diolch. Beth sydd i mi a wnelwyf a "Horeston Grange Deviation"? - ! Eebahgum ( talk) 18:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
You wrote on
WP:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_3#Arupa:
[...]You are making arupa something it is not.[...]
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 14:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Sirfurboy. Ban evasion by whom? You can e-mail me if you prefer. Bishonen | tålk 08:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC).
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Croydon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallington.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your help on this page. Much appreciated. Titus Gold ( talk) 22:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
The Half Barnstar | |
No hard feelings. I value your disagreement Curbon7 ( talk) 18:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks for sorting out the protected areas. I'll take your word for it that they can't be expanded. Some you can expand to start class but I am aware that there are a lot of duds. Try to avoid mass templating me on my talk page though! :-) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
You might be interested in this project that Joe has invited me to. It's intended to be taylored for archaelogical articles, but I'm thinking of a similar guide for archaeogenetic articles in general. Though I'm still waiting for Tewdar to recover from his Halloween hangover before starting with it :) Austronesier ( talk) 21:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
@ Austronesier & Sirfurboy: thanks for the pings and humorous characterisations, although I'm actually immune to hangovers, and self-identify as a hoodlum, not a reprobate 😀. I've been a bit overwhelmed for a couple of weeks, but should be back in action in a couple of days hopefully. I'm looking forward to editing with you both again. All the best, Tewdar 09:10, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Should I undo my PROD as you've improved the article? Thanks, Knitsey ( talk) 21:57, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 22:34, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Sirfurboy. Thought I'd take this to your talk page, as it makes more sense than continuing the same discussion across talk pages (and angry edit summaries!) on the many articles we've both made the same sorts of edits to.
Having logged back into Wikipedia after a week offline, I see you've been continuing to go through Greater London area articles that mention their relevant historic county in the lead. In some cases you've removed mention of the relevant historic county altogether ( [9] [10] [11] [12]) for example. In others you have removed mention of "historic county" and the article instead reads that the place was once in a county ( [13] [14] for example). In others you have written that the place "was in the historic county" "until 1965" ( [15] [16] [17] [18] for example).
We both know that it was my edits to the Croydon article that triggered your edits across Greater London area articles...and your edits triggered a series of edits from me across Greater London articles. Rather than us following each other around, leaving angry talk page replies/edit summaries, and changing each other's edits to achieve our preferred wording, I thought we'd be better off discussing anything historic county-related in the same place. Hopefully this will bring some calm to what has been a rather heated disagreement! PlatinumClipper96 ( talk) 00:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, Sirfurboy🏄 for resolving this issue and getting noticeable editors banned by the Admin-board. I left WP for nearly 2 years because of the endless edit wars by this user, to force HC into the lead. WP:NOTHERE was certainly qualified by years of bold edits whose only reason was to claim HC still exist with the same importance of those estibalished in 1965. Thank you, so much! 81.98.196.96 ( talk) 12:20, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! This is a courtesy note that, following your request at WP:RFCLOSE, I have closed a proposed merge discussion on the talk page of Gallic Wars. Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:49, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you have reverted some of my recent assessments in WP Wales. Can we discuss? I may be persuaded by your opinion, but your reverts have also removed the articles from the WP Wales project in some cases rather than just disagreeing with the assessment. I've done 1000s over the past few days, and I'm sure they will not all be right (and it's subjective), but I have found there are very many Stub tags in articles that are no longer justifiable vs a Start assessment category on the Talk page. welsh ( talk) 20:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Sirfurboy, just for transparency, I have made additions of my text that previously featured in "Welsh dragon" to Carnyx and European dragon. Thanks Titus Gold ( talk) 18:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Sirfurboy. You may be interested in the following drafts, Draft:St Brynach Cross and Draft:Penmon crosses. I've been looking to create pages for notable Welsh artefacts, particularly ones that have relatively consistent names e.g Mold Cape, Moel Hebog, Nanteos Cup etc and using the category "Welsh artefacts", which I have also added to pre-existing articles. Titus Gold ( talk) 12:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
V (Vlang) ( Wukuendo) 09:29, March 13 2023 (UTC)
I probably butchered that! Where about in Wales are you based/from? I'm an expat Scot in Ceredigion. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 18:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
You seem to be making confrontational edits and seem to be targeting any proposals I make. There is no real logic behind keeping List of ports in England and Wales and it seems as though you have an agenda of keeping "England and Wales" formats wherever you can, suggesting a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view concern. Please try to be more constructive rather than confrontational and frustrating discussions with unnecessary processes. Titus Gold ( talk) 17:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
You may have noticed I've nominated English rule in Wales to Afd. I thought I should formally notify you, because I notice to made a lot of edits last month in an attempt to improve the article. The AfD discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English rule in Wales. Sionk ( talk) 19:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Purley, London you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie ( talk) 20:43, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ethnicity. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Both of you are edit warring and need to discuss on the talk page. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Purley, London you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Purley, London for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie ( talk) 14:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't want to get into an editing war and would appreciate your guidance and opinion. Please see the discussion on the talk page regarding cannabis under the heading personal life. I removed a statement after concern about it was raised and explained the reasons. The person who wrote the statement put the reference back in minutes later. If you feel I should have left the statement I will leave the reinserted statement about using cannabis when younger in. If you think it is something that might be an issue, could you please help me avoid a war. I did read one of the messages on this page that said it's possible to post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Where and how do I do this? Kiwatts ( talk) 21:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi,
You are incorrect in your edit re Buckinghamshire and the 12 plus. It was called the 12 plus in Buckinghamshire from the 1960's until the 1990's and the Hansard link was the discussion in Parliament re changing the 12 plus to the 11 plus in 1995/1996. ( Mabbs001 ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)) Mabbs001 ( talk) 09:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
No need to apologise - and also I wasn't meaning to discount the need for further investigation. Just that there could be other explanations too. Although - I'm not entirely sure what the practical options are for investigating it further are. Btw, thanks and well done for biting the bullet and opening that thread. It's crossed my mind to do it a few times, but successfully getting across WP:CPUSH at that venue is not easy. DeCausa ( talk) 22:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of William Street Bird. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. JML1148 ( talk | contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
A brief note of thanks for bringing this to ANI. That forum can be a challenging place, and you have done myself, other editors and the Wales pages a considerable service. Hopefully, a period away from the Welsh area will enable TG to reflect, and begin to understand why their editing was of such concern to a wide range of editors. At least, one can live in hope. KJP1 ( talk) 10:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
I was about to say the same thing. Thanks for pulling things together to raise the issue formally. It needed to happen, judging from the huge animosity expressed from such a broad range of editors. Such a shame the small number of useful and constructive edits were dwarfed by the problematic ones. Amser i fynd ymlaen. Sionk ( talk) 16:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your reversal of my edit just now, I am Irish, have lived in England, (primarily London), for the past 49 years. I've even taught English for a time. My favourite poet is Dylan Thomas, (for his lyricism), and my first my first wife was Welsh, ergo you can be certain I know British English, including cockney, as spoken in the four countries of the realm. Nobody in Britain with any reasonable education says "had got"; it's either "got" or "had gotten". I note Google attributes "gotten" to North American English, but look it up in the Cambridge or Oxford dictionaries and you'll see I'm right. Mark Dask 14:51, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
, but look at the dates on these. None of these are modern except one that is from an American source. So yes, it was correct, but is it considered correct now? Well Fowler tells me (and I checked this out before reversing your edit):1653 H. Holcroft tr. Procopius War with Vandals ii. 46 in tr. Procopius Hist. Warres Justinian Maximinus..had gotten many of those mutiners with a design to usurp.
- that from Pocket Fowler, Second edition, page 42. Also page 45. And indeed page 308 which says:Some of the more significant differences are due to uses that disappeared in BrE but survived in AmE (such as the use of gotten as a past participle of get, and the use of theater and other spellings in -er)
gotten. 1 Few uses mark out the Americanness of a person more readily than their natural use of got and gotten as alternative past participles of get. (These uses are also spreading to Australia and New Zealand, as some of the examples given below will show.) Gotten is no longer used in Britain (except in ill- gotten), although it was once in regular use.
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Hello. Using the information you provided in your corrected edit of mine, on the 11th. July, at 06:59, of my citing Lewisham as Edward Lanchesters's place of birth, (which I, in my turn, took from his page because it was stated by someone unknown to me), I've now put your provided information on Lanchesters's own page, and cited you in the Edit Summary as the information's provider). Thanks. Heath St John ( talk) 16:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod blp}} tag from Johnnie Lynn, which you proposed for deletion, as the article now includes one or more sources. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please feel free to nominate it for deletion with a regular {{ prod}} or via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! –– FormalDude (talk) 08:48, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sirfurboy.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around! Thanks, Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:04, 16 August 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, i am trying to add some useful clues for the decryption of Linear-A using Dolkos' work. I used external links for the pictures of a pin and a ring which i describe specificaly (museum item number etc.) Was it the only error ? I need you to please specify what made you delete my additions so i fix them and do it properly. Thank you. 109.242.96.37 ( talk) 18:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
You moved text added by @
Hogyncymru: from
Welsh dragon to
Flag of Wales as the text is about the flag and not the dragon per se
. I think it was right to move it, but is it even about the actual flag itself? I wonder if the text in question really belongs somewhere like
Welsh nationalism?
Dorsetonian (
talk) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Sirfurboy, I know we are all busy, so please don't take this the wrong way. It's not referring to just you, but what had been going on previously. You have also given me (and others) lots of guidance, so you have my full respect. By the way, really don't like to be forced into the edit battle on V, because want to look at other programming language pages that are in draft.
Yet, another aspect about this issue is the continous visible errors left on the article. Seeing them just left there, also pulls me in, as belive how an article looks (any article) is important too. I think what was done were just editing mistakes, but it has happened so many times, I'm really not sure at this point. Weird spacing, visible formatting problems, inconsistent or conflicting information or odd wording being shown, misspellings, tags, etc... It gives the impression that those who might be "opposed" to it or at least someone else's version of it, are so hasty to revert or tear down the work of others, that they don't care about the state or quality in which the article is left in. Just saying, please look at this aspect of the debate too. I'm trying to leave at least a presentable article, that the public can read. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Wukuendo ( talk) 02:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Horst_Wessel".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
47.219.237.179 ( talk) 21:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I hadn't sen a ref cited like that before in all my years here. Can you bring up another example? I'm not doubting it in any way just it'd be very useful for at least a few articles. Would the rp template also work in the context of chapters or is there a separate one there for such? Kung Fu Man ( talk) 15:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Dank
Jae is wishing you
Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user
Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Dank Jae 09:17, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
As mentioned in : /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grsecurity : Could you add the non-compliance with the GPL2 and the lawsuit section to one of the GPL articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.196.239 ( talk) 01:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
I'll pass, thanks. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)14:47, 31 December 2023 Aoidh talk contribs blocked 24.186.196.239 talk with an expiration time of 31 hours (anon. only, account creation blocked) (Block evasion)
Shwmae! I've reverted and changed slightly the IPA for Penparcau to reflect the Standard Welsh pronunciation (as opposed to colloquial pronunciation). However, I am not at all dogmatic about this, and the colloquial pronuncuation is very common, so I think one could argue both ways. Either way, I'm happy for it to be whatever the consensus is :)
The only one I'd not really give weight is the less common Anglicized 'pen-park-ee' pronunciation.
Diolch, a dymuniadau gorau 2A00:23C7:7C9B:AB01:859:8379:EBEB:EF99 ( talk) 20:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Just asking and speculating, but do the sources comments (aside ours) at Talk:Snowdonia#Request to rename page to Welsh name Eryri being the dominant., and Talk:Brecon Beacons National Park#Bannau Brycheiniog name look similar? I get the impression, although not concrete in such accusation with such weak evidence, and not willing to escalate it from my side. But find it odd for a new single-edit editor to just have it suddenly prepared. Could indeed be someone new, but still odd. Not encouraging anything further unless you wish, nor wish for it to be seen as censoring the other side.
Also while we're on the topic, still not forgotten the bunch of students? all appearing at the same time at teaching of Welsh history, then completely disappearing within a few days of each other. But could be legitimate but still odd. Ofc, they do not seem to have caused any disruption afterwards. Dank Jae 13:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello again! I was wondering if you had the time, if you could take a look at our conversation & consensus to see if i closed everything correctly per the Wikipedia rules. Thank you! Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 17:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Elvisisalive95 ( talk) 18:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to salvage the page :) Back in September it was a nice article, now it's a promotional mess... Broc ( talk) 17:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
You are the greatest. Thanks for your diplomacy early on and for your patience and willingness to help and teach a newbie. I have been studying and even learned wikitext. I'm currently having fun and learning new things while working on the Unreferenced Articles WikiProject. Thank you!
Kiwatts (
talk) 01:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit I had made, correctly I assume, to fix a harv no-target error. However, the error returned because a footnote points to Rasmussen 1988. Thanks. Andy02124 ( talk) 15:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello!
I just wanted to ask what your plan was with the whole county flags discussion. I know the topic can be a bit tiring, but now that there's some momentum I'm quite keen to try and find a resolution. The status quo is clearly not going to hold in the long-term, so we'd just be kicking the can to let the current discussion die out. A.D.Hope ( talk) 09:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
You seem like a reasonable person. Could you read the latest discussion on Stephen C. Meyer’s talk page where we are discussing the opposite of what I am recommending for Ken Ham? While I think Ken Ham deserves the term “Pseudoscientist”, I think that Stephen Meyer deserves the opposite where he has been listed as such, and I think that people are emotionally involved there, and I need someone who can take a look without their emotion in the way.
FYI: it’s a long read 😳 Chrisallen87 ( talk) 23:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
He is an advocate of the pseudoscience of intelligent design. Not because I don't think ID is pseudoscientific. It is almost classically pseudoscientific, and the reason this is necessarily so comes down to the whole philosophy and epistemological basis of science. You can argue with the epistemology of science itself (c.f. Gordon Clark who argues against empiricism) but you can't say ID is scientific as science is defined. The reason I don't like that lead is because it is making an up front judgement in a lead that is supposed to be a summary. I'd think "He is an advocate of intelligent design" is sufficient, and especially as the wikilink takes the reader to a page that explains why ID is pseudoscientific. That would, in my view, read more neutrally. I suspect it would take a lot of work to remove the word though - the label "pseudoscientific" tends to engender long debates. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I dunno how I missed what it said on that article about Malkinson not being freed as he didn't confess lol. Cheers for correcting 82.18.162.80 ( talk) 16:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is A Wider Lens. Thank you. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ ( talk) 17:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Sirfurboy, I hope your day is well.
I'm new to Wikipedia editing, having come here to provide greater knowledge to the world through my cache of source information on a narrow range of topics. I recognize that you are an experienced editor and ask your guidance on my "Latter Rain David Schoch" edit.
I understand that the cited non-fiction book is independently published, which is by-and-large frowned upon (and for good reason in many cases). However, please hear my argument for reverting to include this particular non-fiction book.
1) The non-fiction book referencing David Schoch and his church "Bethany Chapel" is a first-hand account of events from a currently living person who attended that church and interacted with David Schoch. It is a true story and identifies itself as such.
2) Wikipedia contains virtually no information on Latter Rain's David Schoch or his church Bethany Chapel.
3) I've uploaded source audio from David Schoch's Bethany Chapel church to YouTube, with further uploads in the works. The audio comes direct from Bethany Chapel (which hasn't existed in over 25 years). I possess audio cassettes from Bethany Chapel, complete with original labeling.
4) I've been cited in university-published scholarly research. I can provide further detail if that will sway you towards including my edit on David Schoch / Bethany Chapel, although I prefer remaining anonymous.
I ask that you consider these points and if you still disagree with reverting to include this non-fiction book as citation / bibliography, please let me know the best course of action to pass my knowledge of David Schoch / Bethany Chapel to Wikipedia and the world.
Thank you Sirfurboy and I look forward to your reply. APCMDG ( talk) 05:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Monadic plane has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 9 § Monadic plane until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
I guess that's some kind of Cornish insult, then?? Martinevans123 ( talk) 10:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Just to drop a note to say that this essay is, very much, as you might have suspected, a write-up of your !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination). I thought it was a very clear and valuable contribution to that discussion, and one I've found myself using in subsequent discussions, so I thought it was worth an essay :)) IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 16:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello! WP:ANI#Talk:Ceredigion. Summer92 ( talk) 09:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)