Welcome to my Talk Page! If you are leaving a note, please remember to be
civil and not to include any
personal attacks, and please remember to sign your message. I am not available all the time due to my personal life and other commitments, though I will respond at a reasonable time; my time zone is displayed on my userpage for reference. At any point, I may choose to remove discussions that are concluded, as I do not prefer the archive system for my talk page. Past discussions can be found in the edit history, while WikiLove messages that I have received can be found
here. |
|
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
Trailblazer101 is busy off-on and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Hey, I'm pretty sure you've added production weekly as a source in the past, so I'm wondering how reliable they are for unannounced projects? Trying to decide if it's worth making a draft for a Wiccan series that they recently listed. -- ZooBlazer talk 02:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Their repeated talk page "revolts" and refusal to work with consensus (or lack thereof) is getting disruptive. We may need to consider taking this to ANI. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 05:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey, if you have time, do you think you could see if you can find any good refs to add to the reception section? I've looked off and on and so far the best I've found is articles calling it one of the best in the MCU/Endgame/Infinity Saga, so I guess we can try to extract some commentary from those if need be. Unfortunately the Endgame reviews don't seem to mention the scene since it was a spoiler at the time. I think the reception is the last major section that needs expanded on the article unless there are other sections that can be added to the article that I haven't thought about. Zoo Blazer 01:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I know this is where ProveIt puts it, but we should be consistent with the other citation templates on each article and put website/publisher/newspaper/magazine or any synonym at the end, as Cite web currently does. If a template is already ordered that way, there's also no need to change it per MOS:VAR. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Trail, I am not subscribed to Sneider's newsletter so couldn't see all the details. Does he specifically say there will not be a second season, or does he just say that the 9 episode halves will not be called first and second seasons? I ask because our previous understanding was for the 18 episodes to be a first season and then another season to be coming after that, so splitting the first 18 episodes into two groups that are not called seasons would not mean the second season is no longer happening, unless Sneider specifically said that. - adamstom97 ( talk) 06:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
I’m told that the old footage effectively constituted six episodes worth of material. Scardapane wrote a new pilot episode, plus two more episodes that were tacked on after six episodes that were previously shot. For those doing the math at home, that’s a total of nine episodes, which will be released as the first half of Daredevil: Born Again. The nine-episode second half of Born Again will come a while later, but technically, it won’t be called Season 2 for contractual reasons. Actors often receive raises between seasons, which is why you have to think of Born Again as one big 18-episode limited series.Given that, I was led to believe that the second season is not happening and is actually part of the series being a limited series as a whole, similar to how the likes of Better Call Saul (season 6) was released in two parts. (I tried seeing if archive.today could bypass the paywall though was unsuccessful. I'll see if I can't find another method for others to view his site's articles in full as needed.) I will note that I was skeptical of the 18-episode first season and another second season given it was cagey wording that was admittedly unclear, and it seems, at least from my interpretation of all the sources, that this was always the intention. (I didn't bring up my skepticism earlier because there wasn't much evidence to support it, until now!) Trailblazer101 ( talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey Trail. Pinging @ KingArti: to this. I saw King link to your report about info in Production Weekly on all the relevant drafts. This definitely seems like a WP:SELFPUBLISH issue (and possibly veering into a WP:COI? I'm not really sure). I think we need to use the actual Production Weekly citations in our articles (and perhaps in a hidden comment put "via [your newsletter cite]"). I'm going to go through an undo the edits linking to your newsletter so you (or anyone else with Production Weekly access) can accurately add in that citation. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 19:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Saw that you recently closed a discussion here. Just an observation and word of advice (which you can choose to ignore if you wish) per WP:CLOSE that not all discussions need closed, especially discussions with low participation or become stale. Definitely a judgement call, of course. I'm not saying right or wrong here, but moving forward, if there is low participation and you are heavily involved, it may be best to seek outside assistance from an uninvolved editor if you really want to see the discussion closed. The "ideal" closer is one who can genuinely claim they do not care what the outcome is. Involved closers are best only when the outcome is truly uncontroversial. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 15:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Thought you might be interested in these:
Once one gets developed enough, that one can be moved to the actual encyclopedia in the main namespace.
If one goes 6 months without an edit, it'll become eligible for routine deletion from draftspace.
Cheers, — The Transhumanist 21:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings. I write to say to apologize for recent actions in your drafts. I just followed the leads, but it's true that I merged articles without your conscent, despite my good intentions. When the time comes, you decide if the three JL:COIE articles are separate or united. If I didn't apologize, then you wouldn't know. Thank you, and good luck. Fico Puricelli ( talk) 23:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to my Talk Page! If you are leaving a note, please remember to be
civil and not to include any
personal attacks, and please remember to sign your message. I am not available all the time due to my personal life and other commitments, though I will respond at a reasonable time; my time zone is displayed on my userpage for reference. At any point, I may choose to remove discussions that are concluded, as I do not prefer the archive system for my talk page. Past discussions can be found in the edit history, while WikiLove messages that I have received can be found
here. |
|
Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
Trailblazer101 is busy off-on and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Hey, I'm pretty sure you've added production weekly as a source in the past, so I'm wondering how reliable they are for unannounced projects? Trying to decide if it's worth making a draft for a Wiccan series that they recently listed. -- ZooBlazer talk 02:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Their repeated talk page "revolts" and refusal to work with consensus (or lack thereof) is getting disruptive. We may need to consider taking this to ANI. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 05:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey, if you have time, do you think you could see if you can find any good refs to add to the reception section? I've looked off and on and so far the best I've found is articles calling it one of the best in the MCU/Endgame/Infinity Saga, so I guess we can try to extract some commentary from those if need be. Unfortunately the Endgame reviews don't seem to mention the scene since it was a spoiler at the time. I think the reception is the last major section that needs expanded on the article unless there are other sections that can be added to the article that I haven't thought about. Zoo Blazer 01:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I know this is where ProveIt puts it, but we should be consistent with the other citation templates on each article and put website/publisher/newspaper/magazine or any synonym at the end, as Cite web currently does. If a template is already ordered that way, there's also no need to change it per MOS:VAR. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hey Trail, I am not subscribed to Sneider's newsletter so couldn't see all the details. Does he specifically say there will not be a second season, or does he just say that the 9 episode halves will not be called first and second seasons? I ask because our previous understanding was for the 18 episodes to be a first season and then another season to be coming after that, so splitting the first 18 episodes into two groups that are not called seasons would not mean the second season is no longer happening, unless Sneider specifically said that. - adamstom97 ( talk) 06:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
I’m told that the old footage effectively constituted six episodes worth of material. Scardapane wrote a new pilot episode, plus two more episodes that were tacked on after six episodes that were previously shot. For those doing the math at home, that’s a total of nine episodes, which will be released as the first half of Daredevil: Born Again. The nine-episode second half of Born Again will come a while later, but technically, it won’t be called Season 2 for contractual reasons. Actors often receive raises between seasons, which is why you have to think of Born Again as one big 18-episode limited series.Given that, I was led to believe that the second season is not happening and is actually part of the series being a limited series as a whole, similar to how the likes of Better Call Saul (season 6) was released in two parts. (I tried seeing if archive.today could bypass the paywall though was unsuccessful. I'll see if I can't find another method for others to view his site's articles in full as needed.) I will note that I was skeptical of the 18-episode first season and another second season given it was cagey wording that was admittedly unclear, and it seems, at least from my interpretation of all the sources, that this was always the intention. (I didn't bring up my skepticism earlier because there wasn't much evidence to support it, until now!) Trailblazer101 ( talk) 07:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey Trail. Pinging @ KingArti: to this. I saw King link to your report about info in Production Weekly on all the relevant drafts. This definitely seems like a WP:SELFPUBLISH issue (and possibly veering into a WP:COI? I'm not really sure). I think we need to use the actual Production Weekly citations in our articles (and perhaps in a hidden comment put "via [your newsletter cite]"). I'm going to go through an undo the edits linking to your newsletter so you (or anyone else with Production Weekly access) can accurately add in that citation. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 19:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Saw that you recently closed a discussion here. Just an observation and word of advice (which you can choose to ignore if you wish) per WP:CLOSE that not all discussions need closed, especially discussions with low participation or become stale. Definitely a judgement call, of course. I'm not saying right or wrong here, but moving forward, if there is low participation and you are heavily involved, it may be best to seek outside assistance from an uninvolved editor if you really want to see the discussion closed. The "ideal" closer is one who can genuinely claim they do not care what the outcome is. Involved closers are best only when the outcome is truly uncontroversial. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 15:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Thought you might be interested in these:
Once one gets developed enough, that one can be moved to the actual encyclopedia in the main namespace.
If one goes 6 months without an edit, it'll become eligible for routine deletion from draftspace.
Cheers, — The Transhumanist 21:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings. I write to say to apologize for recent actions in your drafts. I just followed the leads, but it's true that I merged articles without your conscent, despite my good intentions. When the time comes, you decide if the three JL:COIE articles are separate or united. If I didn't apologize, then you wouldn't know. Thank you, and good luck. Fico Puricelli ( talk) 23:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)