This page has an
administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will automatically hide itself when the backlog is cleared. |
Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · · Archives |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
V | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 23 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed. Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.
Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.
Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Redirect/Deletion reasons. ( | history) |
The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:
Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.
You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (but note also the exceptions listed below this list):
suppressredirect
user right; available to
page movers and admins), perform a
round-robin move. If not, take the article to
Requested moves.
However, avoid deleting such redirects if:
Just as article titles using non-neutral language
are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but
verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{
R from non-neutral name}}
.
Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:
The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.
Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).
STEP I. | Tag the redirect(s).
Enter
| ||
STEP II. | List the entry on RfD.
Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries.
| ||
STEP III. | Notify users.
It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate. may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as: Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]
Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages. |
If this page has been recently modified, it may not reflect the most recent changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 09:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 09:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
That's the exact number of rebounds collected by Wilt Chamberlain in his career. Definitely unworthy of a redirect. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:RFD#DELETE. Also it is never discussed nor mentioned in the article. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
A combination of The Undertaker's real first name and his wife's surname. It makes no sense. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Article already exists. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Dead website that was probably fanmade as well. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This transformation doesn't even exist. No one is going to use it to find "Dragon Ball". Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Oncotype_DX. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. A cursory search onwiki suggests that this is on the verge of being disambiguatable, with (partial?) title matches like USS Captivate (a ship), Captivating (a book), and Captivation (a movie). But I'm not quite sure if this passes the muster of WP:PTM, so to RfD I go. Duckmather ( talk) 04:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Apparently "Thonk" was the title of one album this guy made in 1994, but as many of y'all might know, it's also the name of a commonly used emoji (particularly on Discord). I think Thinking, wikt:thonk, or (if mentioned there) List of Generation Z slang would all be better targets than this, but I'm not quite sure - I'd be happy with Michael Manring being mentioned in a hatnote though. Duckmather ( talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
A fictional element and/or creative work that is not mentioned at the target. "Gorbino" does not appear at the target, nor does "Gorbino" appear anywhere on Wikipedia. Much less their quest appearing anywhere on Wikipedia; no quest is ever alluded to at the target page either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "grib" at the target article, much less a something or someone that's "gribbly". Alternatives include Gribbly's Day Out which exists as a standalone article, as well as Gribble, Roman Gribbs, and the music director of Rec Room (video game). Zero idea or indication why this is going to Grunge currently, although it's done so since 2007. (Doesn't seem to have been mentioned within the former history of Grunger, which is where it used to point back in 2005). These 2005 redirects are... surely something, lol. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not appropriate for a "2007-present" redirect to point to events from a decade ago. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of
Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This is similar to a previous discussion about minor planet names with only the numeration, intsead of the complete name. In short, this redirect is unhelpful, ambigous, and unrelated to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà. I believe that no one will be normally searching to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà by just typing the numeration. Although the minor planet's name is very difficult to type, there are still more plausible, natural and simple redirects, such as the provisional designatiom 2007 UK126. InTheAstronomy32 ( talk) 22:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Precedent indicates this is not useful as a redirect. If "MOS" is supposed to be a namespace, this is not how namespaces work. Spaces should not be separating the prefix and the title, and MOS:OVERLINKING already has existed for seven years prior. Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5#MOS: HYPHEN and others Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The correct pseudo-namespace is MOS. Throughout the years, there have been a number of "lazy prefix" versions of MOS redirects floating around mainspace, which don't capitalize the full prefix of "Manual of Style". The argument is that "Mos" is easier to type than "MOS", and people that don't capitalize the searches would otherwise be piping their pageviews through the lowercase variants. However, this nomination consists of all the pages that are otherwise doing "two things ineffectively". It's implausible to expect someone to type "Mos" in lowercase, before changing their mind and capitalizing the rest of the title, or parts of. There are only 11 of such cases across article-space. For the rest of the "Mos" titles, the vast majority of these pseudo-pseudonamespace redirects are constructed like Mos:bold, in all lowercase for "maximum laziness", which at least serves a unique purpose that the full-capital prefix does not. The swapping back and forth between capitalization is unnatural and already covered by the search box. In all of these situations, the correct version of "MOS:X" already exists, so typing this in yields no difference in results besides unnecessary name duplication among titles. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:UNNATURAL redirect not mentioned at target. Unclear if this is supposed to imply the products are expensive or if it's leetspeak. My keyboard doesn't even have the pound or euro signs. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like the ideal target for this phrase, as I believe this phrase to be ambiguous. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely/not particularly useful search term which is rather unencyclopedic. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
not the only possible target for a 1.3 patch, not the only possible target for a fanmade 1.3 patch, and not the most likely target for a 1.3 patch (that seems to be cyberpunk 2077) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Very implausible redirect. Averages single-digit numbers of yearly pageviews and has less than 200 pageviews for its entire existence since it was created in 2015. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, in for a penny, in for a pound... this nomination consists of every remaining redirect with unclosed parenthesis, of which there are now only twelve. All of these typos are not plausible to intentionally make on their own. Because there's been cumulatively 1000+ or so of these redirect types deleted over the last few months, this nomination seeks to determine whether there's a threshold that makes these redirects acceptable, or if one even exists. Most of these redirects have come to exist through erroneous links, which are updateable. While it's good to have redirects from common misspellings lying around for ease of navigation on Wikipedia, the presence of implausible redirect errors sets unreasonable expectations and portrays the faulty notion to readers that "infinite typo variations are encouraged, regardless of likelihood", when this is not currently the case. For the most part, spelling variations are accepted in redirects; especially with words that are tricky to spell, having a set of titles with minor differences can be useful to capture likely, intentional errors. When it pertains to disambiguation, though, there will never be a time where errors in the act of disambiguation are expected, for any title. While someone might spell a title like Hampster with an intentional (but incorrect) "P", one can generally have 100% confidence that a title with a left parenthesis will contain a right parenthesis, and, as an extension, typing in a title that doesn't contain a right parenthesis will have a 0% likelihood of being redirected to the correct title, as it will never be correctly expected. The disambiguator is Wikipedia's "official insertion" onto the title based on other article names that co-exist here. The tagline's format can be safely assumed as error-free, or if there is an error in the disambiguation, that it will be corrected ASAP without hesitation. Being locked into keeping tabs on any and all errors within this "topic title guarantee" inherited from Wikipedia disambiguation precedent, just because of one (or twelve remaining) bad links on the internet, is just not worth for titles that are one punctuation mark away from the correctness that was already assumed beforehand. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
b) It doesn't seem anyone wants to see more of these types of redirects created, so wouldn't deleting help with that? (There are people who literally spend all their time looking for pages to create, and having redirects like this to obstensibly compensate for typos in page names will just encourage the creation of more.)
Their usage is a false positive, they don't really assist with anything, removing them will not hamper anyone's ability to search, and if we don't want these types of redirects, then we shouldn't be making a special exception to this group just because they exist. (jmho) - wolf 04:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary. I don't think anybody would add a period at the end of the desired page name, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC ( talk) 15:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Could refer to most films listed at {{ Snow White}}, such as Mirror Mirror (film) and Snow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect references Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions of Snow White that are not Disney-related. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible disambiguation typo. No pages link to it, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Macko is not listed at the page for this shooting. What I will note, is that looking up "Nikolas Macko", the shooting almost didn't come up on the first page (was the very last result for me)" This might make sense as it took place in 2007, and as time progresses, older results are less likely to be promoted higher. But in any event, we have no content on this individual. In 2007, they attempted to fend off the shooting from taking place. But, these efforts are not described anywhere on the page or on Wikipedia, to my understanding. I don't think that this is a particularly useful redirect, in the article's current state. Just as Google displays a wide assortment of topics related to different "Nikolas Macko"s, if he isn't discussed in the article any longer, I don't think this redirect is necessary either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
"Nikolas Macko" "shooting", a mention could potentially be added to the article. What do you think? QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A spelling variation of recently deleted Democratic Labor Party (historical). Likely not the same case as the Labor vs Labour spelling distinction has proven to represent different parties, but this disambiguation still might not be the most helpful as well. Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Gag name not mentioned at the target article. Additionally, I have not found any mention of it on this list (although it is user-generated and could be incomplete).
A variant of this gag name had been used in the Simpsons episode 24 Minutes according to the article, but spelt as 'Ahmed Adoudi'. Regardless, I don't think that this joke name is notable enough to be a redirect to any articles involving this. Xeroctic ( talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Unity" or this party at the target page, people searching for this topic will not receive any information about this at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a piece of programming, although it is not mentioned or discussed at the target article, and creates the picture that we have something about this topic when we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of any programming with this title at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I had to do some serious mental gymnastics to wrap my head around why this redirect exists. Sure, some people may perform mental gymnastics when "they're uncomfortable from their beliefs being inconsistent and contradictory". A similar idea I feel could be people perform the act of running to get from Point A to Point B, although that doesn't make the "running" a good redirect to "pathfinding". It's a singular mean to the end, and not everyone that has cognitive dissonance is "performing mental gymnastics", and not everyone that does mental gymnastics has cognitive dissonance. Example: I'm fairly sure I'm performing mental gymnastics right now in an attempt to jump through the logical hoops that went into this redirect, and I don't think I'm too uncomfortable from cognitive dissonance. I believe I've come to understand why, although I don't think it's a great end-all-be-all redirect that takes people to the right location at 100% intentions every time. To me, I feel like Convergent thinking or Divergent thinking are what I would have associated mental gymnastics with, i.e. following along with someone's thought process jumping through hoops with twists and turns to an eventual endpoint. Also, "mental gymnastics" is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lower case version of what's apparently a brand of glue...? Adhesive? In any case, liquid nails are not mentioned at the target, and anyone typing this in instead of adhesive seems to be looking for something else. Has some history, but has also been to RfD before (13 years ago). Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this term at the target article. Almost assuredly has a plethora of other uses outside of... just Fark. The portmanteau of "mod" and "admin" is likely to come up in a number of other more relevant contexts related to moderation and administration. Cautiously though, this term has zero mentions on all Wikipedia, so I'm hesitant to just "retargeting and calling it good". Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of MediaImpression at the target page. Neither this, nor "ArcSoft MediaImpression" are useful redirects in the article's current state, as we have no information at the stub for this subtopic. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of TotalMedia or TotalMedia Theatre at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect as there is no content about this subtopic, and the stub for ArcSoft does not help enlighten readers here. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of
Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lady Godiva is never mentioned or referred to at the target article. Redirect a hyper-specific reference to an apparent synonym where it never is talked about is not very helpful. People looking for exhibitionism would have gotten to that point through just searching Exhibitionism. The current title might just be more helpful pointed at Lady Godiva, if anything, as the presence of a name within the title makes it seem like the name is the most defining aspect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A lack of imagination isn't an "argument from ignorance". It's not being able to imagine and doesn't have to do with arguments. If anything, it's Aphantasia. However, this has been a redirect here for the last 21 years. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Indian films sometimes do this thing were they reshoot 10% or less of the film in another language. Either way, there is absolutely no need for this redirect when Baak (film) exists. only 10% or less of people interest seeing Aranmanai 4 will likely opt to see this version due to low key release. DareshMohan ( talk) 05:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lots of things involve swinging sticks, not just pendulums. The word "swing" nor the word "stick" appear ever at the target page, and can refer to basically anything from baseball to hockey to swordplay and beyond. I'd be hardpressed to think this would be a likely search term for this topic only. Sure, the pendulum may look like "sticks that swing", but the inference of it being a pendulum I believe is the most noteworthy aspect. This is one of the few technical topics that is prominent for its recognizable name and functionality, not just being "sticks that swing". Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A topic not discussed at the target page, as "supple" nor "supplement" ever appear at the target page. Was BLAR'd in 2017 as being based on almost entirely unreliable sources, but does not serve its purpose as a good redirect if there is no content to be read about this at PageRank. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither "strike" nor "force" is listed at the target article, giving this title insufficient context as a redirect to the target article. There is no dedicated information on Wikipedia to this sub label. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Strike" not mentioned at the target either, and Cut fingering was recently deleted. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a rectangle at the target article. And as per the box, no piece of geometry is getting split at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Box" never appears at the target article, and certainly not splitting one. The only few mentions of "split" at the target are in reference to Viacom's. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A neologism portmanteau of a "solid liquid". Picked up by Wendy's, but not mentioned at target, and totally not an all encompassing term for a Frosty, especially for a term representing a space between two distinct phases of matter. See Quasi-solid / Semisolid. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Targets the manufacturers section, but solowheel is not listed as a manufacturer of electric unicycles at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Was created as a non-notable slang term that was instantly BLAR'd, same-day reverted, and reverted back to a redirect yet again. Seems to have no business targeting the pieces of paper left behind after you hole-punch something. I never knew that these had a name, so there you go! Learn something new every day I guess, Wikipedia for you. There was Chav and Chad (slang) that were all in the mix around here, but as this is suitably short and not mentioned there or anywhere in this realm, it doesn't seem of use to keep this redirect around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
a regulation-size field for men's and women's soccer which also can be used for other sports such as lacrosseand they do have both men and women's lacrosse. So improving the article would be fine; but there's no reason to delete this redirect even as-is. Skynxnex ( talk) 14:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be its own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I think the title makes it obvious why. Yes, it's technically pointing to the correct page, but seriously. I doubt "Sucking peepee" is really an encyclopedic redirect to have. Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this is a plausible typo (or what people would expect when searching this term, so it's worse than having nothing). Previously was discussed (and deleted) at RfD and no one suggested this target. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
From previous discussions (in 2013 and 2016), three pages have come up as potential valid redirect targets for this page, List of lists of lists, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists, and Category:Lists.
The current target, List of lists of lists, is in the same namespace, but it's not a complete "list of lists" as not all lists on Wikipedia are listed in "Lists of X" articles, and it's a "list of lists of lists" rather than a direct "list of lists." Next, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists has an approachable format and it's a "list of lists" rather than a "list of lists of lists," but it is also incomplete. And finally, Category:Lists is a complete "list of lists," but it's a category.
I propose that a disambiguation page be created containing these three pages as they all have their pros and cons, making none of them suitable as the sole redirect target. – BrandonXLF ( talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Target was redirected to a different subject per an AfD so is no longer about a band. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The titles of these Netflix original films are no longer mentioned in their target. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:301D:BAB0:803F:CEE ( talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
with the deletion of Peppa Pig TM, this probably also deserves a discussion in the same vain. Okmrman ( talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not discussed at target with sufficient substance to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with other similar redirects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Ductal is a product of Lafarge but isn't mentioned on the article at all. The redirect exists due to a 2015 deletion discussion of the article [7], I believe a redirect to duct would be better given ductal is the adjectivial form of duct. Traumnovelle ( talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
"National culture" is mentioned on the target page, but it isn't a subhead, and this seems to me to be a strange article to redirect this to. I'm not sure someone who searches for "national culture" will understand why they're on this page. I'm not excited about any of the alternatives I considered ( Nationalism?), maybe someone here has a better idea? asilvering ( talk) 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Same terminology, different meanings. Does its meaning depend on the absence/presence of the hyphen, or can it have both meanings either way? – MrPersonHumanGuy ( talk) 21:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 2x (
edit conflict)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Should have the same target as MOS:PUFFERY. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete as inaccurate and implausible. The abortion was performed in Indiana, not Ohio. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected to Xanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section to Vetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Pointless redirect from a supposed draft article. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
It is the most common nickname for himas Crowsus asserts, then it should be added to the article. I don't see how this would be an implausible search term in that case. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
He was nicknamed O Rei (The King). There are multiple people with this nickname in various fields (see, e.g., Elvis Presley or Richard Petty), so "The King of Football" is a plausible disambiguator. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No mainspace page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:SSRT. Do we really need to include such 4-chan internet slang with no encyclopedic value, a "word" not used in any articles? Fram ( talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Company not mentioned at target. Should be tagged as {{ R without mention}} if kept. CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This film released just about 4 months ago and is no longer upcoming. Plenty of time has past to the point that there is no more confusion for a 2023 movie, as it's well into 2024 now. Nobody ending up here who sees "upcoming film" in the title would be surprised by it's removal for a movie releasing last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This seems overly technical. Nobody would really refer to smartphones as a phone computer outside of drawing some comparisons between smartphones and computers. Okmrman ( talk) 04:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a likely typo (the correctly spelled phrase is side dump gondola which has existed as a redirect for a decade). Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps ( talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cremastra (
talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps ( talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cremastra (
talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambig or move?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect should be deleted. The name of the page was an error, it appears that an editor thought that Thermodynamics was short for Thermal dynamics which it is not. The page has been changed to the more appropriate title Thermal transport in nanostructures. The redirect is incorrect, as it is not on thermodynamics, so would take readers in the wrong direction. I cannot find an actual page on thermodynamics in nanostructures, so it should be removed for the moment. Ldm1954 ( talk) 04:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 05:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 23:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
These should point at the same target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:XY, Battle of Spanish Fort is a separate article; both battles/forts are mentioned in both articles, so there is no obvious target, and Battle of Spanish Fort occurred first, making the order confusing. Moreover, Fort Blakeley is misspelled. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The characters have no plural form, so should we retarget to Hulk (disambiguation), soft redirect to wiktionary:hulks, or delete? 176.42.16.148 ( talk) 20:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
For possible deletion, or maybe a redirect to a page which discusses the slur rather than the addiction. Note that this initially redirected to Substance dependence; I changed it to the current redirect to fit with drug addict GnocchiFan ( talk) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
{{
R from avoided double redirect|drug addict}}
--
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)The misspelling combined with the miscapitalization make this not very useful. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i thought it was a peachette deal, but it's not even that. two characters in the gen 3 anime refer to the pokédex as that sometimes maybe probably, and that's as far as it seems to go cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
that's brock's badge, for context. not notable on its own, aside from how boring it looks, and this probably wouldn't be the right target anyway cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
what cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
retarget to the list of gen 4 pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
retarget to the list of pokémon or delete, this ain't the full pokédex cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not sure if this is referring to bird pokémon (like corviknight and the worse corviknight), in which case i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon or delete (more so delete) or to the unused bird type, in which case redirect to missingno without a second or first thought cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon, even though it's a list of all the pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i'd say retarget to kyogre, as it's the first in the weather trio cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
is this really the best place to target, as opposed to pokémon masters ex? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not a list of health items (whatever that's supposed to mean), or focused specifically on crystal cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
maybe retarget to the list of pokémon as with mythical pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not attested anywhere, and its addition to the article was solely referenced to the article's "version history". 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: any thoughts on keeping the redrect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Nonsense redirects. Bessarabia is a region in Eastern Europe. Budjak is a subset of it. Super Ψ Dro 12:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This is uncited but sounds plausible, and it aligns with the bit in Budjak#Name and geography (i.e., the redirect's target) that uses the name historic Bessarabia. There are sources such as this 1927 book (about the Russian annexation of the province) and this 2019 book (about ethnicity, but summarizing the pre-Russian state, in which Bessarabia was vaguely delimited but generally congruent with Budjak), and "province"+"bessarabia"&pg=PA59&printsec=frontcover this book (which confirms Izmail was part of the province of Bessarabia when the Russians took the province from the Ottomans, before they gave it to Moldovia) that verify at least parts of it. At any rate, though I'm unfamiliar with the history of this area, it appears that it's not "nonsense", but merely a detail of history that is not widely known. Consequently, we should probably keep this redirect, and probably improve the target article. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 01:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)The Province of Bessarabia or Besarabya pashalyk in Turkish, was an Ottoman province from 1478 to 1812. Its size varied, however by 1600, it included the towns of Cetatea Alba, Izmail, Tighina, and Kilia.
The Ottoman Province of Bassarabia was annexed by the Russian Empire in 1812, along with all Moldovan territory east of the Prut river, which the Russians governed jointly in one single Russian province of Bessarabia.
The Ottoman Province, only, is more or less the same size as the territory of modern-day Bugeac, which is currently part of the Ukrainian Odessa oblast.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The Principality of Moldavia was never a "province" of the Ottoman Empire. It was never a part of the empire. It always remained a separate country with its own laws and administration under vassalage. These redirects are inaccurate and misleading. Also the "Bogdan/Bogdania/Boğdan" redirects are made up original research. Super Ψ Dro 12:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve ( talk) 22:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 03:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The target article does not mention the word “Pronomian” nor explain what the word means. Bwrs ( talk) 22:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
While the logo might be a mountain, the words "dark" nor "mountain" do not appear anywhere at the target page. We don't have any encyclopedic about a dark mountain logo, which encyclopedic content about a logo seems to be specifically requested through this search term, by including "logo" in the title. With this being tagged as a "related meme without a mention", I'm not too convinced about its plausibility standalone. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I presume this might have once been [mentioned], but now this concept of Dark Deco is not mentioned at the target. It has minor mentions across Wikipedia in reference to properties such as Batman: The Animated Series (across this and 2 other related pages, Gotham City and Andrea Beaumont), and also at Skullgirls in a quote. As it looks like 75% of all mentions of "Dark Deco" are at Batman pages, perhaps sending this to Batman: The Animated Series is the primary topic? Searching "Dark Deco" externally, 50% of my results are all Batman, with the rest of the topics being neologism hodgepodge across blogs and such. Now that I look into this more, I'm close to believing that "Dark Deco" is a specific Batman-related topic, and one that we cover across multiple Batman pages and basically nowhere else, but I wanted to bring this here as the current target has been fairly longstanding. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
A film that is not mentioned at the target article. I presume it's about the target, but with no mentions to Mill, the connection is unclear? Dreamcatching is a similar redirect that currently points to Dreamcatcher, which this is a variation of. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Between Corseque, Spetum, and the fact that this redirect is not mentioned in the current target, it's not clear which subject readers are desiring to locate when searching this term. (However, used to be a section at Polearm#Winged spear, a section which was present in 2012, but was removed at some point that year.) Steel1943 ( talk) 17:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deletion, link baiting differs from clickbait to the degree that the redirect is misleading. Link baiting does not have the deceptive nature of clickbait. [1] Acalc79 ( talk) 14:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Target article doesn't mention Japanator. Anyone has any idea? Neocorelight ( Talk) 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. Youtube suggests it's a parody version of the song, but it's not mentioned here, and doesn't look to be widely covered, and thus an implausible search term in my opinion.
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Misleading redirect, actually pointing to the 51st edition of the festival. Per WP:REDLINK a redlink would be more useful, as it would encourage editors to create the page, and not giving them the impression the page already exists. Cavarrone 16:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Romanian Institute in Albania was originally created under this title. The author, blocked since 2019, appears to have misread the sources he used. Albania granted a Romanian historian property in Sarandë and he established an institute on it and granted half of the land to the Romanian state, but this does not mean a part of Sarandë stopped being a sovereign part of Albania to become part of Romania. The "concession" thing is original research. No sources talk about this using the word "concession" [23]. This is ultimately a hoax. Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë should be deleted too. Super Ψ Dro 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also bundled
Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë and notified of this discussion at the target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 13:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Sobolev space#Bessel potential spaces seems like a more precise target (though the articles should also ideally link to each other). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD'ed but redirects are ineligible for that process. The original PROD statement was: Redirects to an article that doesn't mention Miles.
Appears reasonable to me, this person doesn't seem notable enough to be mentioned in the target article as far as I can tell and I don't immediately see a good alternative target. Pinging original nominator: @
Frankoceanreal.
Tollens (
talk) 07:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The double misspelling (both Appomattox and Court) with the miscapitalization on top makes this highly unlikely to be useful. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 07:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The two seem unrelated. -- 62.166.252.25 ( talk) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
We currently have many "Climate change in country x" titles that redirect to either "Geography of country x" or "Climate of country x". The style guide of WikiProject Climate change describe many aspects that should be in "Climate change in country x" articles that do not belong in articles about the climate or geography of country x. E.g. an article about climate change in a given country is supposed to discuss the greenhouse gas emissions that the country produces and the policies around emissions reductions in the country. The presence of these redirects discourages the creation of more complete articles so I propose that they be deleted. There are many other redirects following the pattern but I am starting with four of them to get community feedback before mass-nominating dozens. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 17:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject never existed to begin with, similar to the 2022 edition in the same compeition.— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDontHaveSkype ( talk • contribs) 10:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect was not tagged for RfD, I have now done it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Not everything that is deplorable is part of Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables". We don't have deplore, so maybe a soft redirect to Wiktionary will have to do. Duckmather ( talk) 06:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to mark this for speedy deletion since there were suggestions in the original deletion discussion to redirect it to Etiquette in technology#Cell phone etiquette, which quickly got put down but someone still redirected it here anyways. I'm just gonna make this discussion to see if the discussion still holds up since it happened all the way back in 2015. Okmrman ( talk) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
about where, why and/or how mobile phone use is prohibited or restricted. That section could be better formatted to suit those needs, as well as include other information and links to eg mobile phones in prison or mobile phones on aircraft. If you feel that section is confusing (I have no idea where you get that sense from), that is where I would suggest your efforts be spent. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NW1223<
Howl at me•
My hunts> 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
best expression of the status quoregarding emoji redirects is that
[e]moji should be redlinks only when we want to encourage the creation of an article about that emoji and/or its meaning. Therefore, as I'm not aware of any editors suggesting that there should be an article about this emoji, this redirect shouldn't be deleted.Per the same expression of the status quo,
[e]mojis with meanings that correspond to multiple articles should target a list, disambiguation page, set index or other place where readers can follow links to the article(s) relevant to their search. Since the start of this RfD, such a place has been developed at both Restrictions on mobile phone use and at Mobile phone#Restrictions. In my view, whether or not this information is better as its own article or as a section in Mobile phone may be outside the scope of the present discussion. I therefore support a retargeting to Restrictions on mobile phone use; with the understanding that - if that article is merged-and-redirected to Mobile phone#Restrictions - the target of this redirect will be automatically updated to match. To be clear, this !vote should not be taken as expressing an opinion on whether or not this information belongs in its own stand-alone article; but rather, as a result of my thoughts that a determination on this is a matter best suited to a different process (e.g. WP:AFD/ WP:PAM).All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 09:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Unique for Wikipedia. Not seen in the wild. Unlikely to be typed due to complexity.. Delete. Викидим ( talk) 00:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NW1223<
Howl at me•
My hunts> 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Since Walter Rhodes was not convicted of murder, the title of this page is misleading and an injustice. As there are multiple people by this name at Walter Rhodes, I am not sure if this page should simply be deleted or disambiguated differently. Gjs238 ( talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous with Wikipedia:Indentation § Outdenting due to {{ outdent2}}. Dabifying this may also help stop people from using od2 in articles (see the infobox in [25]). Nickps ( talk) 12:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
implausible misspelling cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R ( here & here), but - as far as I can see - the target article only contains information about the United Kingdom, not Ireland. In addition, if Hollywood and the Republic of Ireland existed as an article, it would be unclear whether a reader was looking for information about Hollywood and the UK, or about Hollywood and Ireland. I'm therefore proposing deletion per WP:XY & WP:R#D2, as the inclusion of Ireland in these redirects (when it isn't mentioned at the target article) could cause confusion. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 10:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R, but - as far as I can see - the target page doesn't include any mention of Ireland. Proposing deletion per WP:R#D10/ WP:REDLINK. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 10:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention has not yet been added to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa ( talk) 02:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 04:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:RFD#D8. This appears to be the spelling of Trotsky's name in various North Germanic languages and this spelling isn't used in the article. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 04:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Without a mention of "easing", making this already not a great target, there's also no mention of a "function" at the target either. While the page admittedly talks about an "ease-in" and an "ease-out", this is not necessarily an "easing function" and several other topics deal with "easing" as well. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Dog breed redirected at a 2008 AfD, seemingly been unmentioned at the target for over a decade. It's misleading to maintain breed redirect for a dog type that holds zero information on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about this date at the target page, although contains some further unique history. Unlike Jan 2, this has been to RfD before, and closed as no consensus. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about this date at the target page, although contains some history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No discussion of a character called "Kyra Tierney" at the target article. Only mention on Wikipedia is at the disambig page for Tierney linking here, but the presence of a blue link implies we have content about this character, which we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The events are currently a month away. It is the case of WP:TOOSOON
All these also redirects towards 2024 French Open#Events
PrinceofPunjab TALK 05:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try this one more time. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 02:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect was added by an account who also added a Chinatown template to the Balmoral article, this was later reversed. Whilst Balmoral and Dominion Road especially has a large Chinese presence the area is still overwhelmingly European and I've never heard it known as Chinatown. Traumnovelle ( talk) 01:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Priscilla" or "Sebastian" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Well uh, even with replacement words I wouldn't consider "screw" to be equivalent to "poop on", and it's not like there's a pooping variation at play discussed at the target article, either... Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Pokok at the title, making this a confusing target. What I've found is that this is a word that can be found in various languages, which this usecase seems to be one as well. There is [29] on hu.wiki, [30] on ms.wiki, [31] on en.wikt, but even with just hu and ms wikis, without any mention of a translation it's unclear to readers which definition has a "higher priority" for an WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
A "point of interaction component" is not discussed at the target article. Existed as an uncited couple-sentence stub for 14 years before being redirected into the page it was involved with, but is not actually a topic we cover on Wikipedia at this time. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Undiscussed thing(?) from Rick and Morty not discussed at the target page. A 2016 AfD established that this thing(?) is not inherently notable, but I guess not even notable for inclusion at the target page. Not a useful redirect as an undiscussed concept, especially when it has the potential to steal searchers from OTHER articles (in this case, plumbous for lead), only to be taken to A: An article they didn't want to go to, and B: An article they're not sure why it exists, as "plumbus" never gets discussed so this doesn't even help the pure "plumbus" searchers either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this term at the target article. I fear the other location this redirect has pointed at isn't much better either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
A location from The Riftwar Cycle fictional universe, but not mentioned in article. Should redirect to Kingdom of the Isles, but this redirect has the history of Riftwar. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No substantial mention of "Pinkblood" anywhere on Wikipedia; is only stated once in a citation on a different article. If this is a possibly notable group, seems to be worthwhile to keep as a red link to encourage article creation. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this singular joke-line from the show at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally created as a redirect to exhibitionism before being retargeted to anasyrma, this term is mentioned at neither of the articles in question and is not something that we have good coverage on at the moment, with the only mention of this word anywhere on Wikipedia being at the List of paraphilias. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "penitent" or "tangent" at the target article. This might just be a character based on the edit summary(?) but with zero context at the target article there's no reason for people to think such, as readers are left with no context to this search term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "NGC" at the target page; this title has always been a redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Pawanism" at the target page. 7 years ago, it was said that "Pawanism isn't notable on its own, but should be discussed on Pawan Kalyan" in an edit summary. However, it is not. There are multiple people named Pawan on Wikipedia; "Pawanism" is too vague in its current state. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song at the target page, nor is there one at the more expectedly Jake Miller discography listing. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No longer mentioned at the target after a 2012 merge/redirect AfD closure. A high school's stadium does not need to be a redirect to the school if the stadium has no discussion at the target page, although the history may need to be dealt with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article in question does not discuss the "hunting" aspect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous with
Help:Edit summaries § Section editing. In fact, since "→" is not on most keyboards, copying it from an edit summary should be one of the most likely ways it is being searched. Also,
WP:← redirects to
H:AES which causes the two redirects to be inconsistent with each other. I suggest we dabify.
Nickps (
talk) 14:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the proposed target Help pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 13:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:← redirects to H:AES which causes the two redirects to be inconsistent with each otherI only meant that one refers to its arrow's usage in edit summaries and the other does not. I never wanted them to have the same target and I strongly oppose retargeting WP:→ to Help:Automatic edit summaries Nickps ( talk) 16:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 10:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 10:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No edit summary or rcats, confusing why this exists and had to look for myself. Apparently a nickname, although not mentioned at target and not visibly useful. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect is to a section of the article that no longer exists. The section was added by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer, and the redirect was also provided by the sockpuppeteer. The section no longer exists, so the redirect is useless. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Battle of Siversk was merged on the basis that there was no substantial event that would be identified by the article title (see Talk:Battle of Siversk#Merge proposal). First Battle of Siversk was created on the premise that there soon would be a "second battle". However, if there were to be a battle for this town, either now or in the future, it would not be known as either the "first" or the "second" battles. Cinderella157 ( talk) 03:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Terrible redirect, there were numerous Foo Creek massacres, such as Indian Creek massacre, Myall Creek massacre, Waterloo Creek massacre, and on and on. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The Summer Olympics are not known simply as "Games". See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 3#2022 Games. Mia Mahey ( talk) 02:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Should delete as to WP:FANCRUFT. BaduFerreira ( talk) 17:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The current target may be too technical for the search term. Alternatives could be Hilbert space or Euclidean space (or Euclidean space#Technical definition). Also note that the singular Finite dimensional Hilbert space, or the more correct hyphenations Finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces/ Finite-dimensional Hilbert space do not currently exist. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Pluri indeed means plural, but the current target is about grammatical person, and this prefix is used in other contexts (eg. plurinational, plurisexual, etc.) and it's not mentioned in the target page either. It could be dabified in line with multi. -- MikutoH talk! 22:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely misspelling, and web search only shows a bunch of unrelated results. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Sure it's the first six-word story but I don't think that when people refer to six word stories, they specifically refer to this one. Maybe retarget to flash fiction or Six-Word Memoirs. Okmrman ( talk) 20:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
In the book, all of the characters that appear on the Monopoly board or within the decks of cards received a name. Uncle Pennybags' full name was given as Milburn Pennybags, the character "In Jail" is named "Jake, the Jailbird", and the police officer on Go to Jail is named "Officer Mallory".𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 22:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
no such role exists or has existed - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 08:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
..one state (Uttarakhand) and one union territory (Puducherry) have never had a deputy chief minister.Jay 💬 12:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Should be retargeted to Animal (disambiguation)#Films, like Animal (film) currently, or be deleted. Per the above DAB there are two 2023 films called "Animal", so targeting one specifically is inappropriate. Additionally, neither (including the Indian film) seems to actually be called "Animals". Toadspike ( talk) 16:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
pretty sure multistorey can refer to any building with multiple floors and not just car parks Okmrman ( talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Also Unuk River. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The first result I get when google searching is Walther WA 2000. There is also Hercules W-2000. Okmrman ( talk) 16:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Someone that performs a Flex, or perhaps are flexing (and/or doing the flexing (dance) all the while), can be said to be someone who "flexes". Flexion does not seem to be the only use for this term. Wiktionary or disambiguation might also be suitable here? Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this lyric at the target page. Anakin never mentioned, people searching for this lyric instead of the title of the song are left without the context that was sought. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget either to Dark Fantasy (song)#Legacy or Patrick Fabian#Personal life as those sections both mention the subject, but the article it is redirecting to does not. 108.21.221.8 ( talk) 23:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
...just before he proclaimed that the One Piece is real and that it indeed exists.If it's felt to be necessary, hatnoting to Dark Fantasy#Legacy (This is about the character whose last words were, "The One Piece is real!" For the internet meme that uses this quote, information may be found at Dark Fantasy#Legacy or something along those lines) may be an option, although I can't make the same recommendation for Patrick Fabian-- someone looking for information on the meme itself probably wouldn't be looking for a random celebrity who was asked to read off multiple internet memes, only one of which was the One Piece meme. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 12:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa ( talk) 02:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirects are not the same thing as search engines, this version seems unlikely to be directly linked. Mason ( talk) 03:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect is for non-notable character not listed in the target article. The Google search returns many more relevant results that can be notable. Delete to avoid confusion. Alternatively, within Wikipedia, a plausible possible redirect is Saglikade Bombabomb where Rajnibala is a character. Викидим ( talk) 05:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This was speedy deleted as R3 claiming No mention of a Tim Dwayne in target article
. Since the redirect was created in 2010 R3 doesn't apply, so I've undeleted and am sending to RfD.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 01:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget to Eucestoda, as tapeworm redirects there. 108.21.221.8 ( talk) 01:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The target of this redirect should likely be reconsidered. The most helpful solution may to turn this into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation). Reason: The term "Turkish bath" in a Western context is fairly generic and might also denote other types of steam baths, in addition to the mainly Islamic ones covered at Hammam. Since this was last discussed in 2021 (see here), a more fully-fledged Victorian Turkish bath article now exists. Other articles might also be relevant to link. Note: This came out of a discussion at Talk:Turkish Bath (disambiguation) between myself and Ishpoloni. Feel free to read there for more context & explanation. R Prazeres ( talk) 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hammam is neither primary nor secondary. Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths only have in common that they are baths, and are both derived from the ancient Roman thermae. Victorian Turkish baths are not steam baths. Nor are they really, as the Hammam article states, "A variation on the Muslim bathhouse"—which is why in France and Germany they are called Roman-Irish baths.
The only guiding principle here should be: 'Save the time of the reader' Ranganathan's 4th law. Ishpoloni ( talk) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Having had time to familiarise myself more with the often complicated Wikipedia guidance notes, I now believe that the most equitable solution is the one suggested above by R Prazeres, ie, to change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with
Turkish Bath (disambiguation). This could either be based on the existing one or, perhaps preferably, like the
Mercury page example given in the guidance notes. I believe this is a solution on which we should easily be able to reach consensus.
Reasons:
1. Of the 22 reasons for a redirect given on Wikipedia:Redirect the overwhelming majority relate to different forms of words, grammar, punctuation, etc. Not one exemplifies a redirect of one subject to another subject. [a]
2. On Wikipedia:Disambiguation page the three important points seem to be: (a) naming articles so each has an unique title, eg, Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths; (b) making links so that a term points to the correct article; (c) "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be." (My emphasis)
Proposed resolution: Change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation)
An allied matter: In case there are Western European readers of this Wikipedia, there should be Redirects < Irish-Roman baths and < Roman-Irish baths > Victorian Turkish baths. Ishpoloni ( talk) 07:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely a flag stop is the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The target contains no such list. Both of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target at all. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Discussed at target ones or twice in passing but without enough substance to warrant a redirect. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a plausible search term. Also not mentioned in target (I tried ctrl+f/F3) JuniperChill ( talk) 21:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
(Probably the issue was "Epic Fail", which I can imagine being common in attack pages, and very uncommon in good-faith use.) User:CMBJ hasn't edited in nearly a year, so you're not likely to get any further explanation from him. Nyttend ( talk) 12:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Requesting redirect of epic fail guy and Epic Fail Guy to Guy Fawkes mask as per that article and Wikipedia:Requested articles/Arts and entertainment/Internet and tech culture. CMBJ 10:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There are no incoming links to those; what usefulness would they have? In addition, can you clarify what has changed since the most recent consensus that lead to the deletion of the redirect? Salvidrim!· ✉ 10:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
It is not unreasonable, given the subject's popularity, to assume that users will manually seek out an article at that title. As for the above discussion, it pertained to an inappropriate redirect that lacked any supporting content, whereas this target explicitly mentions the subject. CMBJ 10:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
(EC) The request to remove the redirect from EFG -> 4chan was based on no mention in the article. EFG is mentioned at the guy fawkes mask article as part of its section on Anonymous usage of the mask, and its origins. The only redirect to 4chan kept in that discussion was one that was used in the 4chan article. No comment on how useful this is to have currently. Although Anonymous is a bit more noteworthy since 2009, I am surprised there is no mention at that article, as while EFG isnt notable in itself as a 4chan meme (there are loads of them) it is relevant to the Anonymous group. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 10:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Created. Why couldn't you do it? Is there some blacklist that prevented you? Nyttend ( talk) 22:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I didn't happen to notice what exactly was precluding its creation, but without the admin flag it definitely wasn't happening. CMBJ 04:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No affinity for ALL CAPS. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably Eclipse Foundation is a more precise target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget to Sea Cadets (United Kingdom). Current target does not mention the term "Navy League", which seems to apply to the Sea Cadets organization prior to merging with the Marine Society. Hoof Hearted ( talk) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely search terms and it's unclear how they should relate to the target. These redirects don't even use the proper number of asterisks to replace the letters. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target. External searches don't pull up anything related to this scale, although it appears to be an alternative name for Heqet, says Google. However, it does not appear at Heqet (our page on Wikipedia uses "Heket", but Google's definitely uses "Hekt"). In any case, "Hekt" is short enough to have a surplus of other mentions on Wikipedia as a word, appearing across the board in terms of viability as a redirect. Also sometimes short for "Hektor" and several others. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely search term. MSMST1543 ( talk) 16:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect, clubs of specific schools would typically not be made into an article (or redirect for that matter) unless it is notable. This is the only redirect to High school fencing aside from a different capitalization redirect. B3251 ( talk) 16:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The target section discusses the "Hitler reacts" Downfall/Untergang memes generally, but not specific ones, and I don't think it really needs to. Thus, I'm skeptical of redirecting the names of specific parodies. -- BDD ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
While seemingly in reference to the pronunciation of "ANI" as being for "(Little orphan) Annie", I fully thought a shortcut with this name would have been in reference to little orphaned pages on Wikipedia. Anyone familiar enough with the WP culture of "ANI sounds like Annie therefore Little Orphan is a functional redirect", and can solve those literary gymnastics on the dime, would also be familiar enough to use one of the several other more-convenient avenues of reaching this noticeboard. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 12:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
We have successfully kicked the can down the road with this one. Months later, no mention of this quotation from the movie. If it's as important as claimed, it would either A: have its own article, B: be covered SOMEwhere, or C: be a red link to encourage content creation wherever it makes sense to do so. As it stands, A and B are off the table (or at least not yet done), and with nothing on Wikipedia about this quote, this is still not a helpful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Proud of you for saying something so bold, but this is not a useful redirect in its current form. Used to target 9gag, not mentioned there either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A quote not mentioned at the target article. It was suggested at a past RfD that this is a significant quote that people have wrote about externally. Great! It should remain as a red link to encourage article creation, or cited in the page if viable. In the meantime, for the last X years we have had zero content about this quote, so there doesn't need to be a redirect if we don't have anything further to say besides "it exists". People who make the conscious decision to type this instead of "Star Wars" are looking for something related to this, and we don't have it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A TV episode for a program not on Wikipedia, and not discussed at the hosting show article either. Not currently a helpful redirect for people interested in this topic, as it would otherwise not exist for people that read the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither "Hubert" nor, surprisingly, "Lemonade" comes up at the target article. Seems to be a brand of lemonade owned by Coca-Cola, but targeting this specific brand to the overarching company is not useful for people looking for Hubert's Lemonade. If people wanted to read about the Coca Cola company instead, they'd just search for the Coca Cola company directly. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect survived CSD through a charitable BLAR. Not mentioned at the target, not likely to be mentioned at the target. Not a useful redirect in the page's current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This misspelling is unique to Wikipedia, Google does not know about it. Delete. Викидим ( talk) 00:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No song with this name appears at the target page, NOR does it appear at Jake Miller discography either, although a "Hold On" does appear at the discography... Without a disambiguator here though this is already a fairly vague term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The word "react" does not appear in any form at the target article, nor are Hitler's reactions ever alluded to. Does not seem helpful as effectively an "R from unmentioned, related meme term to Internet section" Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
R from merge that does not seem to be mentioned at the target any longer. Confusable with High Noon as is, but as an R from merge perhaps there's a deeper noteworthy-ness of the missing space... Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No song with either of these names is discussed at the target article; nothing present for people searching for this song, only to be given a page with zero relevant information. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently HDIV is now a part of Datadog. However, this framework is never mentioned anywhere at the target article. This undone PROD seems to be either suited for a standalone article (hard as there were no references previously), or no article at all. The status quo of retargeting this to the parent of Datadog does not seem helpful for people searching for this term to find out what HDIV means perhaps, and not having any content at the target to answer these questions. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
According to the halo wiki, there are "many different pistols used in the Halo universe". I don't think this is a useful search term, zero evidence that "Halo 1 pistol" is an alternate name for this pistol even if used by Master Chief. Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out "what's the name of the pistol that Master Chief uses in Halo 1". Not a great precedent for titles, i.e. based on MOS:POPCULT, and franchises that reference a real model of pistol. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither Opera mail nor "OperaMail" are mentioned at the target, much less its supposed .com domain. This domain currently exists on the web as a redirect to opera dot com, and as for Wikipedia, without a mention of operamail this does not seem to be the most helpful currently. (Even if it's a mail site that was acquired by Opera from 2010 to 2013. Notably, this redirect was created in 2011 when the "opera" description was accurate, but Fastmail became independent again very shortly after and has been so for the last decade.) Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about "Open Floor" at the target, which is noted in the edit history as being an "entirely different school than 5Rhythms". Was blanked for a moment in 2021, but was restored as a redirect due to no content being added. In any case, this title is ambiguous with Open floor plan which is a redirect to the article of Open plan, who's content is directly pertinent to open floors. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Open Floor is a style of modern dance, as is 5Rhythms. The two are not the same so the redirect (from a dance point of view) should go to Modern dance, with a brief mention of the approach to be added there. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of anything being "open access", or a "directory" at the target page. Currently, this redirect is not helpful as people who might be looking for this directory are instead taken to information about the university instead of information about the directory that they specified. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this imprint at the target article, anyone specifying this would not receive any content about their search term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[[Random House|One World]]
would provide no more information to the reader than linking via the redirect. {{
R to article without mention}} is currently used on
hundreds of pages besides this one. I just don't see the harm in such a redirect, and it's useful for linking. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk) 12:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Redirected to the history of podcasting after an AfD, because there was no sourced content worth merging. However, it doesn't appear at the target any longer, if it appeared to begin with if the merge idea fell through. Does not seem to be a useful redirect in the target's current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Nutrient" at the target page. Was created as a redirect without mention at the target. Afterward, the creator proceeded to link this term in the See Also sections of high profile pages that had very stringent connections to the "Recovery and Reuse of Nutrients". Seems to be an effort to establish notoriety to this term, which appears nowhere on Wikipedia in an academic context, sans the randomly piped See Also mentions. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Nonstop Sampler at the target discography, does not seem to be a likely search term without any content pertinent to it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither nine nor noon are noted near this novella. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a program called "Nights" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently a god in Egyptian mythology, however this god is not ever described at the Osiris article, and bears no mention. People who search this term are left confused as to the correlation between this god and Osiris. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I just created it but I'm not sure anymore. I noticed willingness could mean the same. Or should it be targeted to Wiktionary? -- MikutoH talk! 23:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's get some !votes in here. If you're proposing to disambiguate, please mention which pages might be listed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gribbly
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gorbino's Quest
Used to target a section, since removed. The article does not talk about gender, and is a WP:XY situation as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently this specific political party's formal name at one point in the past included the em dash. Since readers are unlikely to be familiar with the way Nepalese political parties copy each other's names with minor pertubations this should be retargeted to the dab at Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence the current target is the primary topic for this specific spelling, retarget to dab at Strathcona#Canadian electoral districts. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
When federal and provincial riding names differ only in punctuation, one or both should include disambiguation in their titles as if their names were identical (e.g. Edmonton—Strathcona and Edmonton-Strathcona (provincial electoral district)).. Yes, it does use an outdated vision of this specific redirect as an example. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
differ only in punctuation. I would say they do. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)
"Baker–Unity Highway" is mentioned at both targets. "No. 13" is mentioned nowhere, leaving the context confused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
That section no longer exists. This character is mentioned exactly once in the whole article, and that mention is in passing. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp, this requires a full discussion. @ JayCubby, L293D, Robert McClenon, SmokeyJoe, Alalch E., Pppery, Matrix, Queen of Hearts, and NasssaNser: — pinging participants in the MfD discussion. BD2412 T 16:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The set index is not a disambiguation. I can only find Dougie as a dance, and Dougie (given name), but I can't find the 3rd. If you can't find the 3rd one, will this page be deleted or kept? 176.42.17.150 ( talk) 16:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD'd by user:Ergzay, who states "Destination page no longer contains info regarding this and no page on Wikipedia exists for this. Best to return this to non-existence and let someone create it when it's needed." PROD can only be used on actual articles, so I'm moving this here as a courtesy. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the current and proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 15:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per the outcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Paramount Television International Studios, where incoming links were the hurdle straight after a page move, I've given it enough time for the actual targets and/or rdr targets to be sorted out. The reason or rationale is the same as its/the original listing. Intrisit ( talk) 06:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a local(?) satirical(?) magazine published by a boarding school. Zero standalone notability, existed as two sentences that were BLAR'd immediately into the school it was published from. No mention of "goulash" anywhere at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Modmin
No mention of this novel feature(?), aspect? mentioned at the target article. Has three other mentions on Wikipedia in different contexts, also Mimoides exists with a number of subarticles on species. Not currently a useful redirect without context at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Mental gymnastics
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#PanoramaMaker
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#TotalMedia Theatre
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#MediaImpression
Salt evasion of Fucktard. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 05:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target page. Tea2min ( talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The term has not yet been added back to the list.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 05:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Nikolas Macko
This redirect is categorized as follows: A meme quotation from film and television, that is not mentioned at the article. Wikipedia is not an infinite compendium of unmentioned memes. Not a helpful redirect as people who want to read about The Godfather would search for The Godfather. Specifying a meme implies a search for specific content that we don't have on WP. Delete. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Liquid nails
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lady Godiva syndrome
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lack of imagination
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Drama Juniors Marathi
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Jau Bai Gavat Unseen
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Basilan Unity Party
Unicorns are not real. The article makes no mention of unicorns. It would be impossible for a hornless unicorn to be a horse because that would require a fictional creature variant to be real, which it is not and never will be. The target page does not mention unicorns in the slightest. Anyone that specifies "unicorn" instead of "horse" is likely looking for a unicorn related subtopic, instead of the general WP:SYNTH explanation for horse. Unicorn, Unicorn horn, or deletion are all preferable outcomes for this title which currently exists unmentioned at the horse page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Legendary single-horned horse-like creature
Legendary animal, that looks like a horse with a horn on the forehead
Honestly, I have no idea how this WP:XNR survived RfD. "Cat:" is not a pseudo-namespace. Looking at WP:Shortcut#List of prefixes, "Cat:" appears nowhere. It is not widely accepted, it is nowhere accepted. CAT:NN has existed since 2006. This lowercase version was created in 2020. The RfD said "keep because it is used widely in links" which is simply entirely incorrect. The search result provided then, showed usage of EXCLUSIVELY the uppercase variant. From a quantitative perspective, CAT:NN has 500+ links. Cat:NN has zero, besides the deletion notifications. If someone wants to campaign for the existence of a new lowercase "Cat" namespace, that should be done before the existence of these redirects. (Which as per Pandora's WikiBox, the existence of one has since introduced two more also bundled). Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Ahmed adoodie
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Democratic Labour Party (historical)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Joever
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#List of lists
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Ductal
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#National culture
The addition of "Freeze" means that it can't be confused with Live at Tokyo Dome, but despite that, without a mention of this lyric, we don't have anything for readers that search the specific lyric of "everybody clap your hands" instead of the song itself. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
basically the only one in the entire songWa-huh?? The Cha Cha Slide is basically nothing BUT lyrics, associated dance moves, a backing beat, and after the line Cha-Cha now, y'all, a short funky sting. Have you been listening to the same song I have??The main issue is that the song isn't referred to as the "Cha-Cha Slide" in the lyrics-- it's referred to as the Casper Slide Part 2.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Larissa Hodge
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Kannagi (upcoming film)
This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in Paradise, California, nowhere near Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Winged spear
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Link baiting
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Romanian concession in Sarandë
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Phone computer
I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact. Hildeoc ( talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
this is actually a psychological termCan you provide a source defining this psychological term? The only uses I could find were all literal uses, i. e. talking about thinking that is faulty.
two [...] conceptions of faulty thinkingThat's two different terms. So we'd need to a) disambiguate, b) find articles to link to, which are defining these idioms. Alternatively a set index article would also be conceivable, though this would require a whole lot more sources.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 10:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Japanator.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dream Catching
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Deco
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Pronomian
No mentions of "clean" at the target page. At the target page, the act of singing is never implied to be "clean", or even consist of "clean vocals". The primary justification for this redirect existing is that unclean vocals is a redirect to death growl. Yet, its antonym has no mention at the general page for "singing". If clean and unclean vocals are antonyms, and both are redirects, this seems to imply that the concepts of "singing" and "death growl" are also "antonyms" in regard to vocal quality? Likely true, but never addressed (nor does it need to be imo). For someone specifically looking for information on the topic of "clean vocals", it seems to be preferable for these readers to end up at a topic that is directly pertinent to vocal quality. If people wanted to end up at Singing instead, they'd type singing, a concept everyone would have already been familiar with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Template:Independent MPs in Canada used to be at this pagename until I moved it to clarify its scope and avoid potential confusion with other navboxes, e.g. Template:Independent MPs in the United Kingdom. Now that the Canadian navbox is transcluded directly through its new name, I suggest that the old name be deleted to avoid any future mix-ups, e.g. being added to a British MP's biography by mistake. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned alternative name. Basically any time it comes up on Wikipedia, is people (including residents) saying that they've never heard this alternative name. The sources raised have all been mediocre, and as this was never added post-discussion-conclusion, it does not seem to have any use and only adds confusion for those who search this term and end up at a city where its colloquial(?)/uncommon nickname is not mentioned. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Technofascism and Techno-fascism
searching it up on google doesn't result in 8 mm but it does show another bullet type Okmrman ( talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
7.00 to 7.99 millimetres (0.2756 to 0.3146 in) caliber range.Anything at 7.92 mm should be listed there. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#Deplorable
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (movie)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (documentary)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (film)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (film)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (movie)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#2021 Chinese FA Super Cup
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Law of fives
Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc ( talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
| dependency_liability
parameter in
Infobox drug such as
Caffeine,
Cocaine or
MDMA, where it pipes to the same article as the redirect's destination. That being said, it could be expanded into an article since there's probably enough information on the subject, or at the very least something like
List of psychoactive substances by dependence liability could be created to further establish the term. —
Mugtheboss (
talk) 12:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
| dependency_liability
parameter being active, making it widespread across the wiki. —
Mugtheboss (
talk) 10:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 20:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 03:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Jake the Jailbird
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Royal tart
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Animals (2023 film)
Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc ( talk) 05:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged the redirect as a "R from merge" and notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 15:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete due to no suitable target, since Grandstaff is not only known for voicing Daria and is mentioned in several other articles, including those related to Beavis and Butt-Head, The Real World (TV series), and Taina (TV series) (see [41]). — Goszei ( talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve ( talk) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
If(1)
the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and(2)
the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. (2) is currently true, but (1) is not, as there isn't scope for a full standalone Paratheo-Anametamystikhood of Eris Esoteric article. There isn't a general prohibition on redirects not mentioned in the target, only specific prohibitions in specific situations that don't apply here ( WP:RFD#D8, WP:RFD#D10). Also see WP:RFD#K5 and the POEE pageview stats - it has several daily pageviews, even before being RfD'd. DefaultFree ( talk) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful." and #10 from above "
If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." This cannot be expanded into an article based on current information. And the article should not be restored unless independent sourcing can be found and based on BURDEN. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Rajnibala
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Amc interview with the vampire
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Garv Sangwan
Delete in the spirit of WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Favorability
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gribbly
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Goulash (magazine)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gorbino's Quest
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Paramount Television International Studios
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#General OneFile
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gender and authoritarianism
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#DZHH-AM
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Snow White remake
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Insurance goal
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Hockey bag
Deletion, eFinancialCareers is no longer owned by DHI Group or Dice.com [1] Mjhobson ( talk) 13:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other similar redirect mentioned by Jay.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Jeez
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Moira Sullivan (Smallville)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Fucktarded
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Joever
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)
This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking
After the merging of Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restoration of the previous target - Luxury real estate, may not be an option per the recently concluded DRV. We have so far only one vote suggesting targetting all to Real estate "for now" probably pending the discussion of Luxury real estate, but with that now out of the way, we can re-view this RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia
A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes ( talk / cont) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92
This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable
This page has an
administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will automatically hide itself when the backlog is cleared. |
Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · · Archives |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
V | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 23 |
TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
RfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 36 |
AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Redirects for discussion (RfD) is the place where potentially problematic redirects are discussed. Items usually stay listed for a week or so, after which they are deleted, kept, or retargeted.
Please do not unilaterally rename or change the target of a redirect while it is under discussion. This adds unnecessary complication to the discussion for participants and closers.
Please be aware of these general policies, which apply here as elsewhere:
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Redirect/Deletion reasons. ( | history) |
The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:
Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.
You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (but note also the exceptions listed below this list):
suppressredirect
user right; available to
page movers and admins), perform a
round-robin move. If not, take the article to
Requested moves.
However, avoid deleting such redirects if:
Just as article titles using non-neutral language
are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but
verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{
R from non-neutral name}}
.
Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:
The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.
Nominations should remain open, per policy, about a week before they are closed, unless they meet the general criteria for speedy deletion, the criteria for speedy deletion of a redirect, or are not valid redirect discussion requests (e.g. are actually move requests).
STEP I. | Tag the redirect(s).
Enter
| ||
STEP II. | List the entry on RfD.
Click here to edit the section of RfD for today's entries.
| ||
STEP III. | Notify users.
It is generally considered good practice to notify the creator and main contributors of the redirect(s) that you nominate. may be placed on the creator/main contributors' user talk page to provide notice of the discussion. Please replace RedirectName with the name of the respective creator/main contributors' redirect and use an edit summary such as: Notice of redirect discussion at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]
Notices about the RfD discussion may also be left on relevant talk pages. |
If this page has been recently modified, it may not reflect the most recent changes. Please purge this page to view the most recent changes. |
"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 09:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
"Redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created" per WP:RFD#DELETE. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 09:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
That's the exact number of rebounds collected by Wilt Chamberlain in his career. Definitely unworthy of a redirect. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RNEUTRAL and WP:RFD#DELETE. Also it is never discussed nor mentioned in the article. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
A combination of The Undertaker's real first name and his wife's surname. It makes no sense. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Article already exists. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Dead website that was probably fanmade as well. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This transformation doesn't even exist. No one is going to use it to find "Dragon Ball". Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Oncotype_DX. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or Restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. A cursory search onwiki suggests that this is on the verge of being disambiguatable, with (partial?) title matches like USS Captivate (a ship), Captivating (a book), and Captivation (a movie). But I'm not quite sure if this passes the muster of WP:PTM, so to RfD I go. Duckmather ( talk) 04:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Yet another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Apparently "Thonk" was the title of one album this guy made in 1994, but as many of y'all might know, it's also the name of a commonly used emoji (particularly on Discord). I think Thinking, wikt:thonk, or (if mentioned there) List of Generation Z slang would all be better targets than this, but I'm not quite sure - I'd be happy with Michael Manring being mentioned in a hatnote though. Duckmather ( talk) 04:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
A fictional element and/or creative work that is not mentioned at the target. "Gorbino" does not appear at the target, nor does "Gorbino" appear anywhere on Wikipedia. Much less their quest appearing anywhere on Wikipedia; no quest is ever alluded to at the target page either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "grib" at the target article, much less a something or someone that's "gribbly". Alternatives include Gribbly's Day Out which exists as a standalone article, as well as Gribble, Roman Gribbs, and the music director of Rec Room (video game). Zero idea or indication why this is going to Grunge currently, although it's done so since 2007. (Doesn't seem to have been mentioned within the former history of Grunger, which is where it used to point back in 2005). These 2005 redirects are... surely something, lol. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Not appropriate for a "2007-present" redirect to point to events from a decade ago. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of
Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This is similar to a previous discussion about minor planet names with only the numeration, intsead of the complete name. In short, this redirect is unhelpful, ambigous, and unrelated to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà. I believe that no one will be normally searching to 229762 Gǃkúnǁʼhòmdímà by just typing the numeration. Although the minor planet's name is very difficult to type, there are still more plausible, natural and simple redirects, such as the provisional designatiom 2007 UK126. InTheAstronomy32 ( talk) 22:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Precedent indicates this is not useful as a redirect. If "MOS" is supposed to be a namespace, this is not how namespaces work. Spaces should not be separating the prefix and the title, and MOS:OVERLINKING already has existed for seven years prior. Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 5#MOS: HYPHEN and others Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The correct pseudo-namespace is MOS. Throughout the years, there have been a number of "lazy prefix" versions of MOS redirects floating around mainspace, which don't capitalize the full prefix of "Manual of Style". The argument is that "Mos" is easier to type than "MOS", and people that don't capitalize the searches would otherwise be piping their pageviews through the lowercase variants. However, this nomination consists of all the pages that are otherwise doing "two things ineffectively". It's implausible to expect someone to type "Mos" in lowercase, before changing their mind and capitalizing the rest of the title, or parts of. There are only 11 of such cases across article-space. For the rest of the "Mos" titles, the vast majority of these pseudo-pseudonamespace redirects are constructed like Mos:bold, in all lowercase for "maximum laziness", which at least serves a unique purpose that the full-capital prefix does not. The swapping back and forth between capitalization is unnatural and already covered by the search box. In all of these situations, the correct version of "MOS:X" already exists, so typing this in yields no difference in results besides unnecessary name duplication among titles. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:UNNATURAL redirect not mentioned at target. Unclear if this is supposed to imply the products are expensive or if it's leetspeak. My keyboard doesn't even have the pound or euro signs. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like the ideal target for this phrase, as I believe this phrase to be ambiguous. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely/not particularly useful search term which is rather unencyclopedic. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
not the only possible target for a 1.3 patch, not the only possible target for a fanmade 1.3 patch, and not the most likely target for a 1.3 patch (that seems to be cyberpunk 2077) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Very implausible redirect. Averages single-digit numbers of yearly pageviews and has less than 200 pageviews for its entire existence since it was created in 2015. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, in for a penny, in for a pound... this nomination consists of every remaining redirect with unclosed parenthesis, of which there are now only twelve. All of these typos are not plausible to intentionally make on their own. Because there's been cumulatively 1000+ or so of these redirect types deleted over the last few months, this nomination seeks to determine whether there's a threshold that makes these redirects acceptable, or if one even exists. Most of these redirects have come to exist through erroneous links, which are updateable. While it's good to have redirects from common misspellings lying around for ease of navigation on Wikipedia, the presence of implausible redirect errors sets unreasonable expectations and portrays the faulty notion to readers that "infinite typo variations are encouraged, regardless of likelihood", when this is not currently the case. For the most part, spelling variations are accepted in redirects; especially with words that are tricky to spell, having a set of titles with minor differences can be useful to capture likely, intentional errors. When it pertains to disambiguation, though, there will never be a time where errors in the act of disambiguation are expected, for any title. While someone might spell a title like Hampster with an intentional (but incorrect) "P", one can generally have 100% confidence that a title with a left parenthesis will contain a right parenthesis, and, as an extension, typing in a title that doesn't contain a right parenthesis will have a 0% likelihood of being redirected to the correct title, as it will never be correctly expected. The disambiguator is Wikipedia's "official insertion" onto the title based on other article names that co-exist here. The tagline's format can be safely assumed as error-free, or if there is an error in the disambiguation, that it will be corrected ASAP without hesitation. Being locked into keeping tabs on any and all errors within this "topic title guarantee" inherited from Wikipedia disambiguation precedent, just because of one (or twelve remaining) bad links on the internet, is just not worth for titles that are one punctuation mark away from the correctness that was already assumed beforehand. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
b) It doesn't seem anyone wants to see more of these types of redirects created, so wouldn't deleting help with that? (There are people who literally spend all their time looking for pages to create, and having redirects like this to obstensibly compensate for typos in page names will just encourage the creation of more.)
Their usage is a false positive, they don't really assist with anything, removing them will not hamper anyone's ability to search, and if we don't want these types of redirects, then we shouldn't be making a special exception to this group just because they exist. (jmho) - wolf 04:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary. I don't think anybody would add a period at the end of the desired page name, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC ( talk) 15:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Could refer to most films listed at {{ Snow White}}, such as Mirror Mirror (film) and Snow White and the Huntsman. There really is no expectation that this redirect references Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) since there have been so many film versions of Snow White that are not Disney-related. Steel1943 ( talk) 03:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Implausible disambiguation typo. No pages link to it, therefore, it can be deleted. 8086-PC ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Macko is not listed at the page for this shooting. What I will note, is that looking up "Nikolas Macko", the shooting almost didn't come up on the first page (was the very last result for me)" This might make sense as it took place in 2007, and as time progresses, older results are less likely to be promoted higher. But in any event, we have no content on this individual. In 2007, they attempted to fend off the shooting from taking place. But, these efforts are not described anywhere on the page or on Wikipedia, to my understanding. I don't think that this is a particularly useful redirect, in the article's current state. Just as Google displays a wide assortment of topics related to different "Nikolas Macko"s, if he isn't discussed in the article any longer, I don't think this redirect is necessary either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
"Nikolas Macko" "shooting", a mention could potentially be added to the article. What do you think? QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A spelling variation of recently deleted Democratic Labor Party (historical). Likely not the same case as the Labor vs Labour spelling distinction has proven to represent different parties, but this disambiguation still might not be the most helpful as well. Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Gag name not mentioned at the target article. Additionally, I have not found any mention of it on this list (although it is user-generated and could be incomplete).
A variant of this gag name had been used in the Simpsons episode 24 Minutes according to the article, but spelt as 'Ahmed Adoudi'. Regardless, I don't think that this joke name is notable enough to be a redirect to any articles involving this. Xeroctic ( talk) 18:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Unity" or this party at the target page, people searching for this topic will not receive any information about this at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a piece of programming, although it is not mentioned or discussed at the target article, and creates the picture that we have something about this topic when we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of any programming with this title at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I had to do some serious mental gymnastics to wrap my head around why this redirect exists. Sure, some people may perform mental gymnastics when "they're uncomfortable from their beliefs being inconsistent and contradictory". A similar idea I feel could be people perform the act of running to get from Point A to Point B, although that doesn't make the "running" a good redirect to "pathfinding". It's a singular mean to the end, and not everyone that has cognitive dissonance is "performing mental gymnastics", and not everyone that does mental gymnastics has cognitive dissonance. Example: I'm fairly sure I'm performing mental gymnastics right now in an attempt to jump through the logical hoops that went into this redirect, and I don't think I'm too uncomfortable from cognitive dissonance. I believe I've come to understand why, although I don't think it's a great end-all-be-all redirect that takes people to the right location at 100% intentions every time. To me, I feel like Convergent thinking or Divergent thinking are what I would have associated mental gymnastics with, i.e. following along with someone's thought process jumping through hoops with twists and turns to an eventual endpoint. Also, "mental gymnastics" is not mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lower case version of what's apparently a brand of glue...? Adhesive? In any case, liquid nails are not mentioned at the target, and anyone typing this in instead of adhesive seems to be looking for something else. Has some history, but has also been to RfD before (13 years ago). Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no information about a panorama maker at the target stub, much less a brand called PanoramaMaker. Not currently a helpful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this term at the target article. Almost assuredly has a plethora of other uses outside of... just Fark. The portmanteau of "mod" and "admin" is likely to come up in a number of other more relevant contexts related to moderation and administration. Cautiously though, this term has zero mentions on all Wikipedia, so I'm hesitant to just "retargeting and calling it good". Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of MediaImpression at the target page. Neither this, nor "ArcSoft MediaImpression" are useful redirects in the article's current state, as we have no information at the stub for this subtopic. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of TotalMedia or TotalMedia Theatre at the target article. This is not a helpful redirect as there is no content about this subtopic, and the stub for ArcSoft does not help enlighten readers here. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of
Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lady Godiva is never mentioned or referred to at the target article. Redirect a hyper-specific reference to an apparent synonym where it never is talked about is not very helpful. People looking for exhibitionism would have gotten to that point through just searching Exhibitionism. The current title might just be more helpful pointed at Lady Godiva, if anything, as the presence of a name within the title makes it seem like the name is the most defining aspect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A lack of imagination isn't an "argument from ignorance". It's not being able to imagine and doesn't have to do with arguments. If anything, it's Aphantasia. However, this has been a redirect here for the last 21 years. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Indian films sometimes do this thing were they reshoot 10% or less of the film in another language. Either way, there is absolutely no need for this redirect when Baak (film) exists. only 10% or less of people interest seeing Aranmanai 4 will likely opt to see this version due to low key release. DareshMohan ( talk) 05:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Lots of things involve swinging sticks, not just pendulums. The word "swing" nor the word "stick" appear ever at the target page, and can refer to basically anything from baseball to hockey to swordplay and beyond. I'd be hardpressed to think this would be a likely search term for this topic only. Sure, the pendulum may look like "sticks that swing", but the inference of it being a pendulum I believe is the most noteworthy aspect. This is one of the few technical topics that is prominent for its recognizable name and functionality, not just being "sticks that swing". Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A topic not discussed at the target page, as "supple" nor "supplement" ever appear at the target page. Was BLAR'd in 2017 as being based on almost entirely unreliable sources, but does not serve its purpose as a good redirect if there is no content to be read about this at PageRank. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither "strike" nor "force" is listed at the target article, giving this title insufficient context as a redirect to the target article. There is no dedicated information on Wikipedia to this sub label. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Strike" not mentioned at the target either, and Cut fingering was recently deleted. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a rectangle at the target article. And as per the box, no piece of geometry is getting split at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Box" never appears at the target article, and certainly not splitting one. The only few mentions of "split" at the target are in reference to Viacom's. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A neologism portmanteau of a "solid liquid". Picked up by Wendy's, but not mentioned at target, and totally not an all encompassing term for a Frosty, especially for a term representing a space between two distinct phases of matter. See Quasi-solid / Semisolid. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Targets the manufacturers section, but solowheel is not listed as a manufacturer of electric unicycles at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Was created as a non-notable slang term that was instantly BLAR'd, same-day reverted, and reverted back to a redirect yet again. Seems to have no business targeting the pieces of paper left behind after you hole-punch something. I never knew that these had a name, so there you go! Learn something new every day I guess, Wikipedia for you. There was Chav and Chad (slang) that were all in the mix around here, but as this is suitably short and not mentioned there or anywhere in this realm, it doesn't seem of use to keep this redirect around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
a regulation-size field for men's and women's soccer which also can be used for other sports such as lacrosseand they do have both men and women's lacrosse. So improving the article would be fine; but there's no reason to delete this redirect even as-is. Skynxnex ( talk) 14:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be its own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I think the title makes it obvious why. Yes, it's technically pointing to the correct page, but seriously. I doubt "Sucking peepee" is really an encyclopedic redirect to have. Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this is a plausible typo (or what people would expect when searching this term, so it's worse than having nothing). Previously was discussed (and deleted) at RfD and no one suggested this target. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
From previous discussions (in 2013 and 2016), three pages have come up as potential valid redirect targets for this page, List of lists of lists, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists, and Category:Lists.
The current target, List of lists of lists, is in the same namespace, but it's not a complete "list of lists" as not all lists on Wikipedia are listed in "Lists of X" articles, and it's a "list of lists of lists" rather than a direct "list of lists." Next, Wikipedia:Contents/Lists has an approachable format and it's a "list of lists" rather than a "list of lists of lists," but it is also incomplete. And finally, Category:Lists is a complete "list of lists," but it's a category.
I propose that a disambiguation page be created containing these three pages as they all have their pros and cons, making none of them suitable as the sole redirect target. – BrandonXLF ( talk) 09:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Chaotıċ Enby (
talk ·
contribs) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Target was redirected to a different subject per an AfD so is no longer about a band. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The titles of these Netflix original films are no longer mentioned in their target. 2607:FEA8:761F:4600:301D:BAB0:803F:CEE ( talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
with the deletion of Peppa Pig TM, this probably also deserves a discussion in the same vain. Okmrman ( talk) 19:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not discussed at target with sufficient substance to warrant a redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with other similar redirects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Ductal is a product of Lafarge but isn't mentioned on the article at all. The redirect exists due to a 2015 deletion discussion of the article [7], I believe a redirect to duct would be better given ductal is the adjectivial form of duct. Traumnovelle ( talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
"National culture" is mentioned on the target page, but it isn't a subhead, and this seems to me to be a strange article to redirect this to. I'm not sure someone who searches for "national culture" will understand why they're on this page. I'm not excited about any of the alternatives I considered ( Nationalism?), maybe someone here has a better idea? asilvering ( talk) 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Same terminology, different meanings. Does its meaning depend on the absence/presence of the hyphen, or can it have both meanings either way? – MrPersonHumanGuy ( talk) 21:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: 2x (
edit conflict)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Should have the same target as MOS:PUFFERY. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete as inaccurate and implausible. The abortion was performed in Indiana, not Ohio. -- Tavix ( talk) 18:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:RDEL #8 BilledMammal ( talk) 03:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally this was a stub article that was PRODded by me; another user removed the PROD and converted the article to a redirect. The problem is, the target does not mention Dulah at all, and (per the original stub) Dulah was nothing more than a rail siding located near Solimar. I find it incredibly unlikely that anyone would search for a rail siding, and even if they did, they won't find any information about it here. The article should have been simply deleted and so should this redirect. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 04:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
In 2018, Colonia Ulpia Traiana was redirected to Xanten. The page has had some debates in the history, and another user is now indicating that this should not redirect to Xanten, though they haven't created a page, only a 'See also' section to Vetera. Given that they have reverted the redirect, I figured it should come to RfD. Significa liberdade (she/her) ( talk) 02:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 14:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Pointless redirect from a supposed draft article. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
It is the most common nickname for himas Crowsus asserts, then it should be added to the article. I don't see how this would be an implausible search term in that case. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
He was nicknamed O Rei (The King). There are multiple people with this nickname in various fields (see, e.g., Elvis Presley or Richard Petty), so "The King of Football" is a plausible disambiguator. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 15:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No mainspace page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:SSRT. Do we really need to include such 4-chan internet slang with no encyclopedic value, a "word" not used in any articles? Fram ( talk) 08:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Company not mentioned at target. Should be tagged as {{ R without mention}} if kept. CycloneYoris talk! 10:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This film released just about 4 months ago and is no longer upcoming. Plenty of time has past to the point that there is no more confusion for a 2023 movie, as it's well into 2024 now. Nobody ending up here who sees "upcoming film" in the title would be surprised by it's removal for a movie releasing last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 10:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This seems overly technical. Nobody would really refer to smartphones as a phone computer outside of drawing some comparisons between smartphones and computers. Okmrman ( talk) 04:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 15:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a likely typo (the correctly spelled phrase is side dump gondola which has existed as a redirect for a decade). Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 02:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps ( talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cremastra (
talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Reopening as a separate nomination this time. Again, this shoud be dabified since the name also refers to scanf format strings. Nickps ( talk) 18:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cremastra (
talk) 19:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disambig or move?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last. Any thoughts on deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect should be deleted. The name of the page was an error, it appears that an editor thought that Thermodynamics was short for Thermal dynamics which it is not. The page has been changed to the more appropriate title Thermal transport in nanostructures. The redirect is incorrect, as it is not on thermodynamics, so would take readers in the wrong direction. I cannot find an actual page on thermodynamics in nanostructures, so it should be removed for the moment. Ldm1954 ( talk) 04:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 05:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 23:52, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This will be the last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 22:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
These should point at the same target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:XY, Battle of Spanish Fort is a separate article; both battles/forts are mentioned in both articles, so there is no obvious target, and Battle of Spanish Fort occurred first, making the order confusing. Moreover, Fort Blakeley is misspelled. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The characters have no plural form, so should we retarget to Hulk (disambiguation), soft redirect to wiktionary:hulks, or delete? 176.42.16.148 ( talk) 20:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
For possible deletion, or maybe a redirect to a page which discusses the slur rather than the addiction. Note that this initially redirected to Substance dependence; I changed it to the current redirect to fit with drug addict GnocchiFan ( talk) 20:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
{{
R from avoided double redirect|drug addict}}
--
65.92.247.66 (
talk) 21:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)The misspelling combined with the miscapitalization make this not very useful. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 20:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i thought it was a peachette deal, but it's not even that. two characters in the gen 3 anime refer to the pokédex as that sometimes maybe probably, and that's as far as it seems to go cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
that's brock's badge, for context. not notable on its own, aside from how boring it looks, and this probably wouldn't be the right target anyway cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
what cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
retarget to the list of gen 4 pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
retarget to the list of pokémon or delete, this ain't the full pokédex cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not sure if this is referring to bird pokémon (like corviknight and the worse corviknight), in which case i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon or delete (more so delete) or to the unused bird type, in which case redirect to missingno without a second or first thought cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i'd say retarget to the list of pokémon, even though it's a list of all the pokémon cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
i'd say retarget to kyogre, as it's the first in the weather trio cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
is this really the best place to target, as opposed to pokémon masters ex? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
not a list of health items (whatever that's supposed to mean), or focused specifically on crystal cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
maybe retarget to the list of pokémon as with mythical pokémon? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is not attested anywhere, and its addition to the article was solely referenced to the article's "version history". 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: any thoughts on keeping the redrect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Nonsense redirects. Bessarabia is a region in Eastern Europe. Budjak is a subset of it. Super Ψ Dro 12:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This is uncited but sounds plausible, and it aligns with the bit in Budjak#Name and geography (i.e., the redirect's target) that uses the name historic Bessarabia. There are sources such as this 1927 book (about the Russian annexation of the province) and this 2019 book (about ethnicity, but summarizing the pre-Russian state, in which Bessarabia was vaguely delimited but generally congruent with Budjak), and "province"+"bessarabia"&pg=PA59&printsec=frontcover this book (which confirms Izmail was part of the province of Bessarabia when the Russians took the province from the Ottomans, before they gave it to Moldovia) that verify at least parts of it. At any rate, though I'm unfamiliar with the history of this area, it appears that it's not "nonsense", but merely a detail of history that is not widely known. Consequently, we should probably keep this redirect, and probably improve the target article. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 01:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)The Province of Bessarabia or Besarabya pashalyk in Turkish, was an Ottoman province from 1478 to 1812. Its size varied, however by 1600, it included the towns of Cetatea Alba, Izmail, Tighina, and Kilia.
The Ottoman Province of Bassarabia was annexed by the Russian Empire in 1812, along with all Moldovan territory east of the Prut river, which the Russians governed jointly in one single Russian province of Bessarabia.
The Ottoman Province, only, is more or less the same size as the territory of modern-day Bugeac, which is currently part of the Ukrainian Odessa oblast.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The Principality of Moldavia was never a "province" of the Ottoman Empire. It was never a part of the empire. It always remained a separate country with its own laws and administration under vassalage. These redirects are inaccurate and misleading. Also the "Bogdan/Bogdania/Boğdan" redirects are made up original research. Super Ψ Dro 12:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve ( talk) 22:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 03:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The target article does not mention the word “Pronomian” nor explain what the word means. Bwrs ( talk) 22:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
While the logo might be a mountain, the words "dark" nor "mountain" do not appear anywhere at the target page. We don't have any encyclopedic about a dark mountain logo, which encyclopedic content about a logo seems to be specifically requested through this search term, by including "logo" in the title. With this being tagged as a "related meme without a mention", I'm not too convinced about its plausibility standalone. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I presume this might have once been [mentioned], but now this concept of Dark Deco is not mentioned at the target. It has minor mentions across Wikipedia in reference to properties such as Batman: The Animated Series (across this and 2 other related pages, Gotham City and Andrea Beaumont), and also at Skullgirls in a quote. As it looks like 75% of all mentions of "Dark Deco" are at Batman pages, perhaps sending this to Batman: The Animated Series is the primary topic? Searching "Dark Deco" externally, 50% of my results are all Batman, with the rest of the topics being neologism hodgepodge across blogs and such. Now that I look into this more, I'm close to believing that "Dark Deco" is a specific Batman-related topic, and one that we cover across multiple Batman pages and basically nowhere else, but I wanted to bring this here as the current target has been fairly longstanding. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
A film that is not mentioned at the target article. I presume it's about the target, but with no mentions to Mill, the connection is unclear? Dreamcatching is a similar redirect that currently points to Dreamcatcher, which this is a variation of. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 18:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Between Corseque, Spetum, and the fact that this redirect is not mentioned in the current target, it's not clear which subject readers are desiring to locate when searching this term. (However, used to be a section at Polearm#Winged spear, a section which was present in 2012, but was removed at some point that year.) Steel1943 ( talk) 17:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Deletion, link baiting differs from clickbait to the degree that the redirect is misleading. Link baiting does not have the deceptive nature of clickbait. [1] Acalc79 ( talk) 14:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Target article doesn't mention Japanator. Anyone has any idea? Neocorelight ( Talk) 01:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit! 17:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. Youtube suggests it's a parody version of the song, but it's not mentioned here, and doesn't look to be widely covered, and thus an implausible search term in my opinion.
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 17:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Misleading redirect, actually pointing to the 51st edition of the festival. Per WP:REDLINK a redlink would be more useful, as it would encourage editors to create the page, and not giving them the impression the page already exists. Cavarrone 16:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Romanian Institute in Albania was originally created under this title. The author, blocked since 2019, appears to have misread the sources he used. Albania granted a Romanian historian property in Sarandë and he established an institute on it and granted half of the land to the Romanian state, but this does not mean a part of Sarandë stopped being a sovereign part of Albania to become part of Romania. The "concession" thing is original research. No sources talk about this using the word "concession" [23]. This is ultimately a hoax. Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë should be deleted too. Super Ψ Dro 13:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also bundled
Draft:Romanian concession in Sarandë and notified of this discussion at the target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 13:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Sobolev space#Bessel potential spaces seems like a more precise target (though the articles should also ideally link to each other). 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
No page links here, also an implausible typo or misnomer. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 10:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD'ed but redirects are ineligible for that process. The original PROD statement was: Redirects to an article that doesn't mention Miles.
Appears reasonable to me, this person doesn't seem notable enough to be mentioned in the target article as far as I can tell and I don't immediately see a good alternative target. Pinging original nominator: @
Frankoceanreal.
Tollens (
talk) 07:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The double misspelling (both Appomattox and Court) with the miscapitalization on top makes this highly unlikely to be useful. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 07:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The two seem unrelated. -- 62.166.252.25 ( talk) 06:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
We currently have many "Climate change in country x" titles that redirect to either "Geography of country x" or "Climate of country x". The style guide of WikiProject Climate change describe many aspects that should be in "Climate change in country x" articles that do not belong in articles about the climate or geography of country x. E.g. an article about climate change in a given country is supposed to discuss the greenhouse gas emissions that the country produces and the policies around emissions reductions in the country. The presence of these redirects discourages the creation of more complete articles so I propose that they be deleted. There are many other redirects following the pattern but I am starting with four of them to get community feedback before mass-nominating dozens. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 17:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The subject never existed to begin with, similar to the 2022 edition in the same compeition.— Preceding unsigned comment added by IDontHaveSkype ( talk • contribs) 10:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The redirect was not tagged for RfD, I have now done it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 16:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Another confusing vocabulary word redirect. Not everything that is deplorable is part of Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables". We don't have deplore, so maybe a soft redirect to Wiktionary will have to do. Duckmather ( talk) 06:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 15:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to mark this for speedy deletion since there were suggestions in the original deletion discussion to redirect it to Etiquette in technology#Cell phone etiquette, which quickly got put down but someone still redirected it here anyways. I'm just gonna make this discussion to see if the discussion still holds up since it happened all the way back in 2015. Okmrman ( talk) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
about where, why and/or how mobile phone use is prohibited or restricted. That section could be better formatted to suit those needs, as well as include other information and links to eg mobile phones in prison or mobile phones on aircraft. If you feel that section is confusing (I have no idea where you get that sense from), that is where I would suggest your efforts be spent. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Utopes (
talk /
cont) 04:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NW1223<
Howl at me•
My hunts> 14:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
best expression of the status quoregarding emoji redirects is that
[e]moji should be redlinks only when we want to encourage the creation of an article about that emoji and/or its meaning. Therefore, as I'm not aware of any editors suggesting that there should be an article about this emoji, this redirect shouldn't be deleted.Per the same expression of the status quo,
[e]mojis with meanings that correspond to multiple articles should target a list, disambiguation page, set index or other place where readers can follow links to the article(s) relevant to their search. Since the start of this RfD, such a place has been developed at both Restrictions on mobile phone use and at Mobile phone#Restrictions. In my view, whether or not this information is better as its own article or as a section in Mobile phone may be outside the scope of the present discussion. I therefore support a retargeting to Restrictions on mobile phone use; with the understanding that - if that article is merged-and-redirected to Mobile phone#Restrictions - the target of this redirect will be automatically updated to match. To be clear, this !vote should not be taken as expressing an opinion on whether or not this information belongs in its own stand-alone article; but rather, as a result of my thoughts that a determination on this is a matter best suited to a different process (e.g. WP:AFD/ WP:PAM).All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 09:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Unique for Wikipedia. Not seen in the wild. Unlikely to be typed due to complexity.. Delete. Викидим ( talk) 00:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NW1223<
Howl at me•
My hunts> 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Since Walter Rhodes was not convicted of murder, the title of this page is misleading and an injustice. As there are multiple people by this name at Walter Rhodes, I am not sure if this page should simply be deleted or disambiguated differently. Gjs238 ( talk) 13:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous with Wikipedia:Indentation § Outdenting due to {{ outdent2}}. Dabifying this may also help stop people from using od2 in articles (see the infobox in [25]). Nickps ( talk) 12:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
implausible misspelling cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R ( here & here), but - as far as I can see - the target article only contains information about the United Kingdom, not Ireland. In addition, if Hollywood and the Republic of Ireland existed as an article, it would be unclear whether a reader was looking for information about Hollywood and the UK, or about Hollywood and Ireland. I'm therefore proposing deletion per WP:XY & WP:R#D2, as the inclusion of Ireland in these redirects (when it isn't mentioned at the target article) could cause confusion. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 10:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Recently accepted at WP:AFC/R, but - as far as I can see - the target page doesn't include any mention of Ireland. Proposing deletion per WP:R#D10/ WP:REDLINK. All the best, — a smart kitten[ meow 10:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mention has not yet been added to the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Delete or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa ( talk) 02:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 04:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:RFD#D8. This appears to be the spelling of Trotsky's name in various North Germanic languages and this spelling isn't used in the article. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 04:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Without a mention of "easing", making this already not a great target, there's also no mention of a "function" at the target either. While the page admittedly talks about an "ease-in" and an "ease-out", this is not necessarily an "easing function" and several other topics deal with "easing" as well. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 08:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Dog breed redirected at a 2008 AfD, seemingly been unmentioned at the target for over a decade. It's misleading to maintain breed redirect for a dog type that holds zero information on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about this date at the target page, although contains some further unique history. Unlike Jan 2, this has been to RfD before, and closed as no consensus. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about this date at the target page, although contains some history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No discussion of a character called "Kyra Tierney" at the target article. Only mention on Wikipedia is at the disambig page for Tierney linking here, but the presence of a blue link implies we have content about this character, which we do not. Utopes ( talk / cont) 16:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The events are currently a month away. It is the case of WP:TOOSOON
All these also redirects towards 2024 French Open#Events
PrinceofPunjab TALK 05:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion. The redirect is overly specific and too long and is therefore an unlikely search term. GoldenBootWizard276 ( talk) 19:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's try this one more time. Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 02:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect was added by an account who also added a Chinatown template to the Balmoral article, this was later reversed. Whilst Balmoral and Dominion Road especially has a large Chinese presence the area is still overwhelmingly European and I've never heard it known as Chinatown. Traumnovelle ( talk) 01:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Priscilla" or "Sebastian" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Well uh, even with replacement words I wouldn't consider "screw" to be equivalent to "poop on", and it's not like there's a pooping variation at play discussed at the target article, either... Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Pokok at the title, making this a confusing target. What I've found is that this is a word that can be found in various languages, which this usecase seems to be one as well. There is [29] on hu.wiki, [30] on ms.wiki, [31] on en.wikt, but even with just hu and ms wikis, without any mention of a translation it's unclear to readers which definition has a "higher priority" for an WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
A "point of interaction component" is not discussed at the target article. Existed as an uncited couple-sentence stub for 14 years before being redirected into the page it was involved with, but is not actually a topic we cover on Wikipedia at this time. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Undiscussed thing(?) from Rick and Morty not discussed at the target page. A 2016 AfD established that this thing(?) is not inherently notable, but I guess not even notable for inclusion at the target page. Not a useful redirect as an undiscussed concept, especially when it has the potential to steal searchers from OTHER articles (in this case, plumbous for lead), only to be taken to A: An article they didn't want to go to, and B: An article they're not sure why it exists, as "plumbus" never gets discussed so this doesn't even help the pure "plumbus" searchers either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this term at the target article. I fear the other location this redirect has pointed at isn't much better either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
A location from The Riftwar Cycle fictional universe, but not mentioned in article. Should redirect to Kingdom of the Isles, but this redirect has the history of Riftwar. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No substantial mention of "Pinkblood" anywhere on Wikipedia; is only stated once in a citation on a different article. If this is a possibly notable group, seems to be worthwhile to keep as a red link to encourage article creation. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this singular joke-line from the show at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Originally created as a redirect to exhibitionism before being retargeted to anasyrma, this term is mentioned at neither of the articles in question and is not something that we have good coverage on at the moment, with the only mention of this word anywhere on Wikipedia being at the List of paraphilias. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "penitent" or "tangent" at the target article. This might just be a character based on the edit summary(?) but with zero context at the target article there's no reason for people to think such, as readers are left with no context to this search term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "NGC" at the target page; this title has always been a redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Pawanism" at the target page. 7 years ago, it was said that "Pawanism isn't notable on its own, but should be discussed on Pawan Kalyan" in an edit summary. However, it is not. There are multiple people named Pawan on Wikipedia; "Pawanism" is too vague in its current state. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song at the target page, nor is there one at the more expectedly Jake Miller discography listing. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No longer mentioned at the target after a 2012 merge/redirect AfD closure. A high school's stadium does not need to be a redirect to the school if the stadium has no discussion at the target page, although the history may need to be dealt with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The article in question does not discuss the "hunting" aspect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 17:35, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous with
Help:Edit summaries § Section editing. In fact, since "→" is not on most keyboards, copying it from an edit summary should be one of the most likely ways it is being searched. Also,
WP:← redirects to
H:AES which causes the two redirects to be inconsistent with each other. I suggest we dabify.
Nickps (
talk) 14:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk of the proposed target Help pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 13:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:← redirects to H:AES which causes the two redirects to be inconsistent with each otherI only meant that one refers to its arrow's usage in edit summaries and the other does not. I never wanted them to have the same target and I strongly oppose retargeting WP:→ to Help:Automatic edit summaries Nickps ( talk) 16:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 10:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-existing now at List of Resident Evil characters since they are not characters but a minor company. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 10:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
No edit summary or rcats, confusing why this exists and had to look for myself. Apparently a nickname, although not mentioned at target and not visibly useful. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect is to a section of the article that no longer exists. The section was added by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer, and the redirect was also provided by the sockpuppeteer. The section no longer exists, so the redirect is useless. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete. Battle of Siversk was merged on the basis that there was no substantial event that would be identified by the article title (see Talk:Battle of Siversk#Merge proposal). First Battle of Siversk was created on the premise that there soon would be a "second battle". However, if there were to be a battle for this town, either now or in the future, it would not be known as either the "first" or the "second" battles. Cinderella157 ( talk) 03:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Terrible redirect, there were numerous Foo Creek massacres, such as Indian Creek massacre, Myall Creek massacre, Waterloo Creek massacre, and on and on. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 02:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The Summer Olympics are not known simply as "Games". See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 3#2022 Games. Mia Mahey ( talk) 02:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Should delete as to WP:FANCRUFT. BaduFerreira ( talk) 17:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The current target may be too technical for the search term. Alternatives could be Hilbert space or Euclidean space (or Euclidean space#Technical definition). Also note that the singular Finite dimensional Hilbert space, or the more correct hyphenations Finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces/ Finite-dimensional Hilbert space do not currently exist. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Pluri indeed means plural, but the current target is about grammatical person, and this prefix is used in other contexts (eg. plurinational, plurisexual, etc.) and it's not mentioned in the target page either. It could be dabified in line with multi. -- MikutoH talk! 22:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely misspelling, and web search only shows a bunch of unrelated results. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Sure it's the first six-word story but I don't think that when people refer to six word stories, they specifically refer to this one. Maybe retarget to flash fiction or Six-Word Memoirs. Okmrman ( talk) 20:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target article unclear. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
In the book, all of the characters that appear on the Monopoly board or within the decks of cards received a name. Uncle Pennybags' full name was given as Milburn Pennybags, the character "In Jail" is named "Jake, the Jailbird", and the police officer on Go to Jail is named "Officer Mallory".𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 22:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
no such role exists or has existed - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 08:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
..one state (Uttarakhand) and one union territory (Puducherry) have never had a deputy chief minister.Jay 💬 12:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Should be retargeted to Animal (disambiguation)#Films, like Animal (film) currently, or be deleted. Per the above DAB there are two 2023 films called "Animal", so targeting one specifically is inappropriate. Additionally, neither (including the Indian film) seems to actually be called "Animals". Toadspike ( talk) 16:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 20:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
pretty sure multistorey can refer to any building with multiple floors and not just car parks Okmrman ( talk) 20:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Also Unuk River. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 18:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The first result I get when google searching is Walther WA 2000. There is also Hercules W-2000. Okmrman ( talk) 16:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Someone that performs a Flex, or perhaps are flexing (and/or doing the flexing (dance) all the while), can be said to be someone who "flexes". Flexion does not seem to be the only use for this term. Wiktionary or disambiguation might also be suitable here? Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this lyric at the target page. Anakin never mentioned, people searching for this lyric instead of the title of the song are left without the context that was sought. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget either to Dark Fantasy (song)#Legacy or Patrick Fabian#Personal life as those sections both mention the subject, but the article it is redirecting to does not. 108.21.221.8 ( talk) 23:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
...just before he proclaimed that the One Piece is real and that it indeed exists.If it's felt to be necessary, hatnoting to Dark Fantasy#Legacy (This is about the character whose last words were, "The One Piece is real!" For the internet meme that uses this quote, information may be found at Dark Fantasy#Legacy or something along those lines) may be an option, although I can't make the same recommendation for Patrick Fabian-- someone looking for information on the meme itself probably wouldn't be looking for a random celebrity who was asked to read off multiple internet memes, only one of which was the One Piece meme. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 ( talk) 12:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. jlwoodwa ( talk) 02:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For further opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirects are not the same thing as search engines, this version seems unlikely to be directly linked. Mason ( talk) 03:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect is for non-notable character not listed in the target article. The Google search returns many more relevant results that can be notable. Delete to avoid confusion. Alternatively, within Wikipedia, a plausible possible redirect is Saglikade Bombabomb where Rajnibala is a character. Викидим ( talk) 05:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 06:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This was speedy deleted as R3 claiming No mention of a Tim Dwayne in target article
. Since the redirect was created in 2010 R3 doesn't apply, so I've undeleted and am sending to RfD.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 01:51, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget to Eucestoda, as tapeworm redirects there. 108.21.221.8 ( talk) 01:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The target of this redirect should likely be reconsidered. The most helpful solution may to turn this into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation). Reason: The term "Turkish bath" in a Western context is fairly generic and might also denote other types of steam baths, in addition to the mainly Islamic ones covered at Hammam. Since this was last discussed in 2021 (see here), a more fully-fledged Victorian Turkish bath article now exists. Other articles might also be relevant to link. Note: This came out of a discussion at Talk:Turkish Bath (disambiguation) between myself and Ishpoloni. Feel free to read there for more context & explanation. R Prazeres ( talk) 00:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hammam is neither primary nor secondary. Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths only have in common that they are baths, and are both derived from the ancient Roman thermae. Victorian Turkish baths are not steam baths. Nor are they really, as the Hammam article states, "A variation on the Muslim bathhouse"—which is why in France and Germany they are called Roman-Irish baths.
The only guiding principle here should be: 'Save the time of the reader' Ranganathan's 4th law. Ishpoloni ( talk) 13:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Having had time to familiarise myself more with the often complicated Wikipedia guidance notes, I now believe that the most equitable solution is the one suggested above by R Prazeres, ie, to change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with
Turkish Bath (disambiguation). This could either be based on the existing one or, perhaps preferably, like the
Mercury page example given in the guidance notes. I believe this is a solution on which we should easily be able to reach consensus.
Reasons:
1. Of the 22 reasons for a redirect given on Wikipedia:Redirect the overwhelming majority relate to different forms of words, grammar, punctuation, etc. Not one exemplifies a redirect of one subject to another subject. [a]
2. On Wikipedia:Disambiguation page the three important points seem to be: (a) naming articles so each has an unique title, eg, Hammam and Victorian Turkish baths; (b) making links so that a term points to the correct article; (c) "Ensuring that a reader who searches for a topic using a particular term can get to the information on that topic quickly and easily, whichever of the possible topics it might be." (My emphasis)
Proposed resolution: Change the current Redirect into a DAB, merging with Turkish Bath (disambiguation)
An allied matter: In case there are Western European readers of this Wikipedia, there should be Redirects < Irish-Roman baths and < Roman-Irish baths > Victorian Turkish baths. Ishpoloni ( talk) 07:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely a flag stop is the primary topic for this generic term. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The target contains no such list. Both of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Separating this out from the below because there is an episode of the manga titled just "Nanashi" so this could justifiably be thought of as a redirect for that. But really people typing this are likely to be looking for the character, on whom there's not enough substance to warrant a redirect. Has prior history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target at all. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Discussed at target ones or twice in passing but without enough substance to warrant a redirect. Most of these have prior article history but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MÄR characters establishes sufficient agreement from AfD that there's no need to restore. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a plausible search term. Also not mentioned in target (I tried ctrl+f/F3) JuniperChill ( talk) 21:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
(Probably the issue was "Epic Fail", which I can imagine being common in attack pages, and very uncommon in good-faith use.) User:CMBJ hasn't edited in nearly a year, so you're not likely to get any further explanation from him. Nyttend ( talk) 12:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Requesting redirect of epic fail guy and Epic Fail Guy to Guy Fawkes mask as per that article and Wikipedia:Requested articles/Arts and entertainment/Internet and tech culture. CMBJ 10:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
There are no incoming links to those; what usefulness would they have? In addition, can you clarify what has changed since the most recent consensus that lead to the deletion of the redirect? Salvidrim!· ✉ 10:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
It is not unreasonable, given the subject's popularity, to assume that users will manually seek out an article at that title. As for the above discussion, it pertained to an inappropriate redirect that lacked any supporting content, whereas this target explicitly mentions the subject. CMBJ 10:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
(EC) The request to remove the redirect from EFG -> 4chan was based on no mention in the article. EFG is mentioned at the guy fawkes mask article as part of its section on Anonymous usage of the mask, and its origins. The only redirect to 4chan kept in that discussion was one that was used in the 4chan article. No comment on how useful this is to have currently. Although Anonymous is a bit more noteworthy since 2009, I am surprised there is no mention at that article, as while EFG isnt notable in itself as a 4chan meme (there are loads of them) it is relevant to the Anonymous group. Only in death does duty end ( talk) 10:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Created. Why couldn't you do it? Is there some blacklist that prevented you? Nyttend ( talk) 22:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I didn't happen to notice what exactly was precluding its creation, but without the admin flag it definitely wasn't happening. CMBJ 04:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
No affinity for ALL CAPS. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably Eclipse Foundation is a more precise target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 21:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 20:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Retarget to Sea Cadets (United Kingdom). Current target does not mention the term "Navy League", which seems to apply to the Sea Cadets organization prior to merging with the Marine Society. Hoof Hearted ( talk) 19:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely search terms and it's unclear how they should relate to the target. These redirects don't even use the proper number of asterisks to replace the letters. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target. External searches don't pull up anything related to this scale, although it appears to be an alternative name for Heqet, says Google. However, it does not appear at Heqet (our page on Wikipedia uses "Heket", but Google's definitely uses "Hekt"). In any case, "Hekt" is short enough to have a surplus of other mentions on Wikipedia as a word, appearing across the board in terms of viability as a redirect. Also sometimes short for "Hektor" and several others. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely search term. MSMST1543 ( talk) 16:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 17:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary redirect, clubs of specific schools would typically not be made into an article (or redirect for that matter) unless it is notable. This is the only redirect to High school fencing aside from a different capitalization redirect. B3251 ( talk) 16:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The target section discusses the "Hitler reacts" Downfall/Untergang memes generally, but not specific ones, and I don't think it really needs to. Thus, I'm skeptical of redirecting the names of specific parodies. -- BDD ( talk) 15:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
While seemingly in reference to the pronunciation of "ANI" as being for "(Little orphan) Annie", I fully thought a shortcut with this name would have been in reference to little orphaned pages on Wikipedia. Anyone familiar enough with the WP culture of "ANI sounds like Annie therefore Little Orphan is a functional redirect", and can solve those literary gymnastics on the dime, would also be familiar enough to use one of the several other more-convenient avenues of reaching this noticeboard. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 12:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
We have successfully kicked the can down the road with this one. Months later, no mention of this quotation from the movie. If it's as important as claimed, it would either A: have its own article, B: be covered SOMEwhere, or C: be a red link to encourage content creation wherever it makes sense to do so. As it stands, A and B are off the table (or at least not yet done), and with nothing on Wikipedia about this quote, this is still not a helpful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Proud of you for saying something so bold, but this is not a useful redirect in its current form. Used to target 9gag, not mentioned there either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A quote not mentioned at the target article. It was suggested at a past RfD that this is a significant quote that people have wrote about externally. Great! It should remain as a red link to encourage article creation, or cited in the page if viable. In the meantime, for the last X years we have had zero content about this quote, so there doesn't need to be a redirect if we don't have anything further to say besides "it exists". People who make the conscious decision to type this instead of "Star Wars" are looking for something related to this, and we don't have it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A TV episode for a program not on Wikipedia, and not discussed at the hosting show article either. Not currently a helpful redirect for people interested in this topic, as it would otherwise not exist for people that read the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither "Hubert" nor, surprisingly, "Lemonade" comes up at the target article. Seems to be a brand of lemonade owned by Coca-Cola, but targeting this specific brand to the overarching company is not useful for people looking for Hubert's Lemonade. If people wanted to read about the Coca Cola company instead, they'd just search for the Coca Cola company directly. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This redirect survived CSD through a charitable BLAR. Not mentioned at the target, not likely to be mentioned at the target. Not a useful redirect in the page's current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
This misspelling is unique to Wikipedia, Google does not know about it. Delete. Викидим ( talk) 00:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 03:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No song with this name appears at the target page, NOR does it appear at Jake Miller discography either, although a "Hold On" does appear at the discography... Without a disambiguator here though this is already a fairly vague term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The word "react" does not appear in any form at the target article, nor are Hitler's reactions ever alluded to. Does not seem helpful as effectively an "R from unmentioned, related meme term to Internet section" Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
R from merge that does not seem to be mentioned at the target any longer. Confusable with High Noon as is, but as an R from merge perhaps there's a deeper noteworthy-ness of the missing space... Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No song with either of these names is discussed at the target article; nothing present for people searching for this song, only to be given a page with zero relevant information. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently HDIV is now a part of Datadog. However, this framework is never mentioned anywhere at the target article. This undone PROD seems to be either suited for a standalone article (hard as there were no references previously), or no article at all. The status quo of retargeting this to the parent of Datadog does not seem helpful for people searching for this term to find out what HDIV means perhaps, and not having any content at the target to answer these questions. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
According to the halo wiki, there are "many different pistols used in the Halo universe". I don't think this is a useful search term, zero evidence that "Halo 1 pistol" is an alternate name for this pistol even if used by Master Chief. Wikipedia is not a search engine to figure out "what's the name of the pistol that Master Chief uses in Halo 1". Not a great precedent for titles, i.e. based on MOS:POPCULT, and franchises that reference a real model of pistol. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither Opera mail nor "OperaMail" are mentioned at the target, much less its supposed .com domain. This domain currently exists on the web as a redirect to opera dot com, and as for Wikipedia, without a mention of operamail this does not seem to be the most helpful currently. (Even if it's a mail site that was acquired by Opera from 2010 to 2013. Notably, this redirect was created in 2011 when the "opera" description was accurate, but Fastmail became independent again very shortly after and has been so for the last decade.) Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No information about "Open Floor" at the target, which is noted in the edit history as being an "entirely different school than 5Rhythms". Was blanked for a moment in 2021, but was restored as a redirect due to no content being added. In any case, this title is ambiguous with Open floor plan which is a redirect to the article of Open plan, who's content is directly pertinent to open floors. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Open Floor is a style of modern dance, as is 5Rhythms. The two are not the same so the redirect (from a dance point of view) should go to Modern dance, with a brief mention of the approach to be added there. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 06:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of anything being "open access", or a "directory" at the target page. Currently, this redirect is not helpful as people who might be looking for this directory are instead taken to information about the university instead of information about the directory that they specified. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this imprint at the target article, anyone specifying this would not receive any content about their search term. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[[Random House|One World]]
would provide no more information to the reader than linking via the redirect. {{
R to article without mention}} is currently used on
hundreds of pages besides this one. I just don't see the harm in such a redirect, and it's useful for linking. —
Sangdeboeuf (
talk) 12:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Redirected to the history of podcasting after an AfD, because there was no sourced content worth merging. However, it doesn't appear at the target any longer, if it appeared to begin with if the merge idea fell through. Does not seem to be a useful redirect in the target's current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Nutrient" at the target page. Was created as a redirect without mention at the target. Afterward, the creator proceeded to link this term in the See Also sections of high profile pages that had very stringent connections to the "Recovery and Reuse of Nutrients". Seems to be an effort to establish notoriety to this term, which appears nowhere on Wikipedia in an academic context, sans the randomly piped See Also mentions. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Nonstop Sampler at the target discography, does not seem to be a likely search term without any content pertinent to it. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Neither nine nor noon are noted near this novella. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a program called "Nights" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently a god in Egyptian mythology, however this god is not ever described at the Osiris article, and bears no mention. People who search this term are left confused as to the correlation between this god and Osiris. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I just created it but I'm not sure anymore. I noticed willingness could mean the same. Or should it be targeted to Wiktionary? -- MikutoH talk! 23:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Let's get some !votes in here. If you're proposing to disambiguate, please mention which pages might be listed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gribbly
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Gorbino's Quest
Used to target a section, since removed. The article does not talk about gender, and is a WP:XY situation as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Apparently this specific political party's formal name at one point in the past included the em dash. Since readers are unlikely to be familiar with the way Nepalese political parties copy each other's names with minor pertubations this should be retargeted to the dab at Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist). * Pppery * it has begun... 20:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence the current target is the primary topic for this specific spelling, retarget to dab at Strathcona#Canadian electoral districts. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
When federal and provincial riding names differ only in punctuation, one or both should include disambiguation in their titles as if their names were identical (e.g. Edmonton—Strathcona and Edmonton-Strathcona (provincial electoral district)).. Yes, it does use an outdated vision of this specific redirect as an example. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
differ only in punctuation. I would say they do. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Islamist insurgency in Somalia (2007–present)
"Baker–Unity Highway" is mentioned at both targets. "No. 13" is mentioned nowhere, leaving the context confused. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at either target. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
That section no longer exists. This character is mentioned exactly once in the whole article, and that mention is in passing. QuicoleJR ( talk) 17:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp, this requires a full discussion. @ JayCubby, L293D, Robert McClenon, SmokeyJoe, Alalch E., Pppery, Matrix, Queen of Hearts, and NasssaNser: — pinging participants in the MfD discussion. BD2412 T 16:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
The set index is not a disambiguation. I can only find Dougie as a dance, and Dougie (given name), but I can't find the 3rd. If you can't find the 3rd one, will this page be deleted or kept? 176.42.17.150 ( talk) 16:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD'd by user:Ergzay, who states "Destination page no longer contains info regarding this and no page on Wikipedia exists for this. Best to return this to non-existence and let someone create it when it's needed." PROD can only be used on actual articles, so I'm moving this here as a courtesy. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 01:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the current and proposed target talk pages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 15:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Per the outcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3#Paramount Television International Studios, where incoming links were the hurdle straight after a page move, I've given it enough time for the actual targets and/or rdr targets to be sorted out. The reason or rationale is the same as its/the original listing. Intrisit ( talk) 06:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a local(?) satirical(?) magazine published by a boarding school. Zero standalone notability, existed as two sentences that were BLAR'd immediately into the school it was published from. No mention of "goulash" anywhere at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Modmin
No mention of this novel feature(?), aspect? mentioned at the target article. Has three other mentions on Wikipedia in different contexts, also Mimoides exists with a number of subarticles on species. Not currently a useful redirect without context at the target. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Mental gymnastics
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#PanoramaMaker
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#TotalMedia Theatre
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#MediaImpression
Salt evasion of Fucktard. Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 05:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target page. Tea2min ( talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The term has not yet been added back to the list.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 05:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Nikolas Macko
This redirect is categorized as follows: A meme quotation from film and television, that is not mentioned at the article. Wikipedia is not an infinite compendium of unmentioned memes. Not a helpful redirect as people who want to read about The Godfather would search for The Godfather. Specifying a meme implies a search for specific content that we don't have on WP. Delete. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Liquid nails
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lady Godiva syndrome
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Lack of imagination
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Drama Juniors Marathi
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Jau Bai Gavat Unseen
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Basilan Unity Party
Unicorns are not real. The article makes no mention of unicorns. It would be impossible for a hornless unicorn to be a horse because that would require a fictional creature variant to be real, which it is not and never will be. The target page does not mention unicorns in the slightest. Anyone that specifies "unicorn" instead of "horse" is likely looking for a unicorn related subtopic, instead of the general WP:SYNTH explanation for horse. Unicorn, Unicorn horn, or deletion are all preferable outcomes for this title which currently exists unmentioned at the horse page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Legendary single-horned horse-like creature
Legendary animal, that looks like a horse with a horn on the forehead
Honestly, I have no idea how this WP:XNR survived RfD. "Cat:" is not a pseudo-namespace. Looking at WP:Shortcut#List of prefixes, "Cat:" appears nowhere. It is not widely accepted, it is nowhere accepted. CAT:NN has existed since 2006. This lowercase version was created in 2020. The RfD said "keep because it is used widely in links" which is simply entirely incorrect. The search result provided then, showed usage of EXCLUSIVELY the uppercase variant. From a quantitative perspective, CAT:NN has 500+ links. Cat:NN has zero, besides the deletion notifications. If someone wants to campaign for the existence of a new lowercase "Cat" namespace, that should be done before the existence of these redirects. (Which as per Pandora's WikiBox, the existence of one has since introduced two more also bundled). Utopes ( talk / cont) 18:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Ahmed adoodie
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Democratic Labour Party (historical)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Joever
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#List of lists
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Ductal
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#National culture
The addition of "Freeze" means that it can't be confused with Live at Tokyo Dome, but despite that, without a mention of this lyric, we don't have anything for readers that search the specific lyric of "everybody clap your hands" instead of the song itself. Utopes ( talk / cont) 23:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
basically the only one in the entire songWa-huh?? The Cha Cha Slide is basically nothing BUT lyrics, associated dance moves, a backing beat, and after the line Cha-Cha now, y'all, a short funky sting. Have you been listening to the same song I have??The main issue is that the song isn't referred to as the "Cha-Cha Slide" in the lyrics-- it's referred to as the Casper Slide Part 2.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Larissa Hodge
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Kannagi (upcoming film)
This is an inaccurate redirect. Paradise Airport is a small airfield in Paradise, California, nowhere near Paradise, Nevada (and nowhere near the size or importance of Las Vegas' international airport). Mistaken redirect that should just be deleted; the airport itself is non-notable so its article was converted to redirect in 2022. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 13:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Winged spear
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Link baiting
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Romanian concession in Sarandë
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Phone computer
I just created this. But to be on the safe side, I wanted to ask for opinions, as this is actually a psychological term that does not appear in the given target as such, in fact. Hildeoc ( talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
this is actually a psychological termCan you provide a source defining this psychological term? The only uses I could find were all literal uses, i. e. talking about thinking that is faulty.
two [...] conceptions of faulty thinkingThat's two different terms. So we'd need to a) disambiguate, b) find articles to link to, which are defining these idioms. Alternatively a set index article would also be conceivable, though this would require a whole lot more sources.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:50, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 10:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Japanator.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dream Catching
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Deco
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Pronomian
No mentions of "clean" at the target page. At the target page, the act of singing is never implied to be "clean", or even consist of "clean vocals". The primary justification for this redirect existing is that unclean vocals is a redirect to death growl. Yet, its antonym has no mention at the general page for "singing". If clean and unclean vocals are antonyms, and both are redirects, this seems to imply that the concepts of "singing" and "death growl" are also "antonyms" in regard to vocal quality? Likely true, but never addressed (nor does it need to be imo). For someone specifically looking for information on the topic of "clean vocals", it seems to be preferable for these readers to end up at a topic that is directly pertinent to vocal quality. If people wanted to end up at Singing instead, they'd type singing, a concept everyone would have already been familiar with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Template:Independent MPs in Canada used to be at this pagename until I moved it to clarify its scope and avoid potential confusion with other navboxes, e.g. Template:Independent MPs in the United Kingdom. Now that the Canadian navbox is transcluded directly through its new name, I suggest that the old name be deleted to avoid any future mix-ups, e.g. being added to a British MP's biography by mistake. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned alternative name. Basically any time it comes up on Wikipedia, is people (including residents) saying that they've never heard this alternative name. The sources raised have all been mediocre, and as this was never added post-discussion-conclusion, it does not seem to have any use and only adds confusion for those who search this term and end up at a city where its colloquial(?)/uncommon nickname is not mentioned. Utopes ( talk / cont) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Technofascism and Techno-fascism
searching it up on google doesn't result in 8 mm but it does show another bullet type Okmrman ( talk) 21:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Dabify or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
7.00 to 7.99 millimetres (0.2756 to 0.3146 in) caliber range.Anything at 7.92 mm should be listed there. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#Deplorable
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (movie)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (documentary)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (film)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#The F-Bomb (film)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#F-Bomb (movie)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 22#2021 Chinese FA Super Cup
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#Law of fives
Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc ( talk) 05:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
| dependency_liability
parameter in
Infobox drug such as
Caffeine,
Cocaine or
MDMA, where it pipes to the same article as the redirect's destination. That being said, it could be expanded into an article since there's probably enough information on the subject, or at the very least something like
List of psychoactive substances by dependence liability could be created to further establish the term. —
Mugtheboss (
talk) 12:08, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
| dependency_liability
parameter being active, making it widespread across the wiki. —
Mugtheboss (
talk) 10:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 20:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 03:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Jake the Jailbird
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Royal tart
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Animals (2023 film)
Needs adequate inclusion. Hildeoc ( talk) 05:56, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Tagged the redirect as a "R from merge" and notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Okmrman (
talk) 15:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete due to no suitable target, since Grandstaff is not only known for voicing Daria and is mentioned in several other articles, including those related to Beavis and Butt-Head, The Real World (TV series), and Taina (TV series) (see [41]). — Goszei ( talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there a primary topic?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at target, I propose deletion. Veverve ( talk) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
If(1)
the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and(2)
the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. (2) is currently true, but (1) is not, as there isn't scope for a full standalone Paratheo-Anametamystikhood of Eris Esoteric article. There isn't a general prohibition on redirects not mentioned in the target, only specific prohibitions in specific situations that don't apply here ( WP:RFD#D8, WP:RFD#D10). Also see WP:RFD#K5 and the POEE pageview stats - it has several daily pageviews, even before being RfD'd. DefaultFree ( talk) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful." and #10 from above "
If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject." This cannot be expanded into an article based on current information. And the article should not be restored unless independent sourcing can be found and based on BURDEN. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 03:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#List of deputy chief ministers of Puducherry
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Rajnibala
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Amc interview with the vampire
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 20#Garv Sangwan
Delete in the spirit of WP:UFILM. Minimal page views, target was released over a month ago. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Favorability
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gribbly
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Goulash (magazine)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gorbino's Quest
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Paramount Television International Studios
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#General OneFile
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Gender and authoritarianism
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 23#DZHH-AM
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25#Snow White remake
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Oncotype DX Colon Cancer Assay
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Insurance goal
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Hockey bag
Deletion, eFinancialCareers is no longer owned by DHI Group or Dice.com [1] Mjhobson ( talk) 13:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled with the other similar redirect mentioned by Jay.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Jeez
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Moira Sullivan (Smallville)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Linda Baldwin (Coronation Street)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Fucktarded
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Joever
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 17#Comedy Shorts Gamer (entertainer)
This is a weird case. The only reason this page exists is due to the creator working around the Raman Raheja title salt. The base name had been speedily deleted 3 times for A7 and G11, and this variant title lasted less than 24 hours as an article, before being WP:BLAR'd into the cricket league. Because there is only a passing mention of Raheja at the target, and no indication that Raheja is an entrepreneur, this redirect does not seem very useful without any content about Raheja being an entrepreneur at the cricket league page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Drew Curtis' FARK.com
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dream Catching
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Mountain (logo)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Dark Deco
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Clean vocals
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Template:Independent MPs
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Ace Deuce
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 24#Colonia Ulpia Traiana
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Faulty thinking
After the merging of Luxury real estate into the general article, the redirect of "luxury home" does not appear to be super useful as it does not bear a mention at any location. Additionally, while the plural version may indicate "multiple homes" being sought, it doesn't seem specific enough to target something besides what the singular version does. Looking at these two options side by side in the search bar, it's a shot-in-the-dark for readers to figure out where each'll go. Perhaps there's a better alternative, because neither status quo seems necessary currently. (I'll mention that "luxury homes" was repointed to the category in 2020 by a user later blocked for NOTHERE). Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Restoration of the previous target - Luxury real estate, may not be an option per the recently concluded DRV. We have so far only one vote suggesting targetting all to Real estate "for now" probably pending the discussion of Luxury real estate, but with that now out of the way, we can re-view this RfD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 18:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 16:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#SpaceX Mars propellant plant
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 16#Immigration control in Russia
A handful of emoticons structured like this are targets to either Emoticon or List of emoticons. In this case, these are all have the nose and mouth, although the eyes don't appear for technical reasons (but do at the page). I'm not seeking deletion, but rather that the difference in targets may be unexpected. Utopes ( talk / cont) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 09:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the word "burnie" at the target article. To that effect, there is only one mention of "burnie board" on Wikipedia, which is in the List of buildings designed by architect John Dalton, as the Burnie Board Residence and Administration Building. Utopes ( talk / cont) 06:05, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 11:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#7.92
This is supposedly another name for this fire. I could not find any evidence of this externally. Onwiki did not particularly help, as not only is this title not mentioned at the article, it is also not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia! I did a search and almost all my results were for "Comozant"; gave this a look on Wikipedia and got nothing. From there I refined my search to just "Comazant", and the only thing I got for all of the first page of my search engine was Comazant being the publisher of a book titled "Captured" by India Blake. Nothing about the fire. And at the end of the day, with zero mentions on Wikipedia including at the target, this title would not be helpful to readers who are left confused about the relationship between St. Elmo's fire and Comazant, as no connection is established between them. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 07:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 15#Deplorable