Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Cornell, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; seems to have just been a railroad waypoint. Passing mentions could be found: [1], but no significant coverage or information could be found. No mention in Cook's history of Modoc County: [2]. Without further information this site is a failure of WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 16:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Kitson Kapiriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability and fulfillment of the GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (
userpage,
talk) 20:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Black Butte, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a community, a non-notable railroad siding named for the nearby mountain of Black Butte, and the adjoining Black Butte Spring. No information found that wasn't about the railroad site, and no evidence was found that this was ever truly a community. It's hard to find information unambiguously about Black Butte (most coverage is of the mountain and surrounding area, or other California places with this name), making this article confusing as well as uninformative. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG without further information.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 03:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Little information found, although nondescript name makes it hard to find mentions that are unambiguously about this place. The cited sources (GNIS and a map) are sufficient for verifiability but not notability, and without further information this place fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite view just shows two houses along a river.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 03:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Valerie, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information found; not mentioned at all in either Holmes' ( https://books.google.com/books?id=wm8UAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=riverside+county&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=valerie&f=false]) or Lech's ( [3]) histories of Riverside County. Satellite view shows a rural intersection with a gas station. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Wadstrom, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; no evidence this was anything more than a railroad waypoint, and not a "community". Not one mention in three histories of Ventura County: [4], [5], [6]. Satellite view just shows an industrial area on the outskirts of Ventura. Cited sources are not sufficient for notability; being in GNIS or being on a railroad line do not confer notability. Glaring failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Honda, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rail siding, not an "unincorporated community". See maps at [7]. Cited sources do not establish notability; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Largo Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence that this location has encyclopedic notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive | |
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.
| |
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi TheCatalyst31 :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood, Iowa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linwood, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Leahy, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; GNIS does not establish notability. Only mention of this place is a 1935 column describing the daily activities of several people "of Leahy": [8], which is a trivial mention. No other sources found. Satellite view of coordinates shows a rural intersection with two (2) buildings and two (2) trees. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Dulah, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. The article itself says Dulah was just a rail siding, which is not a recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. GNIS is not sufficient for notability, and the other two sources do not mention Dulah at all. No information found. Complete waste of bandwidth.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article is factually incorrect. Look at the satellite image of the coordinates: [9]. Does this look like a "community" located on a logging railroad? No, it looks like two dirt tracks meeting in the middle of the forest, and zero other information could be found. GNIS and a place-names book are both considered unreliable for purposes of notability. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Han Kum-ok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability, nothing in English or Korean that I can find
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
toobigtokale (
talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Dulah, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § Dulah, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seward, Oklahoma, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seward, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Cornell, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; seems to have just been a railroad waypoint. Passing mentions could be found: [1], but no significant coverage or information could be found. No mention in Cook's history of Modoc County: [2]. Without further information this site is a failure of WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 16:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Kitson Kapiriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability and fulfillment of the GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (
userpage,
talk) 20:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Black Butte, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not a community, a non-notable railroad siding named for the nearby mountain of Black Butte, and the adjoining Black Butte Spring. No information found that wasn't about the railroad site, and no evidence was found that this was ever truly a community. It's hard to find information unambiguously about Black Butte (most coverage is of the mountain and surrounding area, or other California places with this name), making this article confusing as well as uninformative. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG without further information.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 03:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. Little information found, although nondescript name makes it hard to find mentions that are unambiguously about this place. The cited sources (GNIS and a map) are sufficient for verifiability but not notability, and without further information this place fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite view just shows two houses along a river.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 03:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Valerie, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. No information found; not mentioned at all in either Holmes' ( https://books.google.com/books?id=wm8UAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=riverside+county&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=valerie&f=false]) or Lech's ( [3]) histories of Riverside County. Satellite view shows a rural intersection with a gas station. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Wadstrom, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; no evidence this was anything more than a railroad waypoint, and not a "community". Not one mention in three histories of Ventura County: [4], [5], [6]. Satellite view just shows an industrial area on the outskirts of Ventura. Cited sources are not sufficient for notability; being in GNIS or being on a railroad line do not confer notability. Glaring failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Honda, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rail siding, not an "unincorporated community". See maps at [7]. Cited sources do not establish notability; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Largo Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence that this location has encyclopedic notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive | |
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.
| |
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi TheCatalyst31 :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood, Iowa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linwood, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Leahy, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; GNIS does not establish notability. Only mention of this place is a 1935 column describing the daily activities of several people "of Leahy": [8], which is a trivial mention. No other sources found. Satellite view of coordinates shows a rural intersection with two (2) buildings and two (2) trees. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 00:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Dulah, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. The article itself says Dulah was just a rail siding, which is not a recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. GNIS is not sufficient for notability, and the other two sources do not mention Dulah at all. No information found. Complete waste of bandwidth.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article is factually incorrect. Look at the satellite image of the coordinates: [9]. Does this look like a "community" located on a logging railroad? No, it looks like two dirt tracks meeting in the middle of the forest, and zero other information could be found. GNIS and a place-names book are both considered unreliable for purposes of notability. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
WeirdNAnnoyed (
talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Han Kum-ok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability, nothing in English or Korean that I can find
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
toobigtokale (
talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Dulah, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § Dulah, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seward, Oklahoma, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seward, Oklahoma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging