Shiny stuff |
Welcome! If you post on this page, I will respond on this page. If I post on your talk page, I will have it watchlisted for the duration of the conversation (and possibly longer!), but please feel free to ping me if I appear to have missed something.
Hi. On 02:26, 1 August 2023, you stated addressing me in the Talk:Russia#Removal of maps, "The article you referred to in this discussion was Haiti. Making a mass change across a number of articles to see where you won't get reverted is not a strong argument, and can become disruptive. If you want to cudgel someone about civility, do it on an admin noticeboard."
I will follow the steps listed on the civility policy, emphasizing that "editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. They should focus on improving the encyclopedia while maintaining a pleasant editing environment by behaving politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates." Accusing me or implying that I make "a mass change across a number of articles to see where you won't get reverted" is false and I feel it is an "ill-considered accusations of impropriety" ( WP:ICA).
I explained in the thread that my motivation adding the maps was because I felt there was an informational gap that needed to be addressed. For some reason you decided to imply I was just making the additions to see where I was not going to be reverted. Maybe we misunderstood each other? Can you clarify? Thanks. Thinker78 (talk) 04:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
curprev 19:19, 3 August 2011 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs m 2,498 bytes 0 moved Motherland (Mauritius National Anthem) to Motherland (anthem) over redirect: Per WP:NCDAB and WP:TITLE undothank
@ Chipmunkdavis: Hello, you reverted several edits which contained many additions and specifications, while also removed some unimportant parts from the text, but you provided only very vague explanation to your actions. Please note that edit warring is prohibited on Wikipedia, might result in block and cooperation is encouraged. I provided explanations for my edits, so please refrain from just reverting and discuss everything on Talk page to prevent edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutoc ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Just wondering about this editor .. Real4jyy.
Answering your question etc. I'm all for reverting, just wanted to know if you were in contact with him/her.
Thanks in advance. Bringingthewood ( talk) 04:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Okay. I'll leave things alone for now, maybe one day you'll get a response. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly. Enjoy your week! Bringingthewood ( talk) 20:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello CMD. Can you please check the following revisions of Philippines? They appear to include improper synthesis, or the claims therein are not directly supported by the cited sources. Moreover, the text contains detail better included in the child articles, and it has lengthened the article prose size. If possible, could you please revise the content (maybe the previous revisions before these could be restored, or the new claims are further summarized).
Thanks. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 14:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 29#Population of cities Moxy- 19:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Fat finger, or what? Bishonen | tålk 21:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC).
Hi @ Chipmunkdavis:, just checking, in your recent revert for the article Disneyland with the Death Penalty, a lot of the verbs was changed from past tense to present tense. Wouldn't past tense be more correct since the article is about a topic that happened in the past and is not happening now? Or was the tense just reverted along with other questionable content changes? Any objection for me changing it to past tense? Zhanzhao ( talk) 05:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, we've interacted briefly over the years and I always thought you were cool as hell. I'm not sure if you are well-traveled or if you're just clever. I assume the latter. In any case, I've become attracted to Wikivoyage recently because the community is great, you don't feel like you're constantly in the trenches, and there's this sort of liberation feeling where you can write about the world, as truthfully as possible, without the burden of worrying about sourcing or phrasing. It's like a retirement Wikipedia. This is only to say that, the sort of interesting stuff that you're interested in here is the sort of stuff that requires attention there. Africa, for example. So, if you ever felt like contributing there I would ring the hallelujah bell, but regardless I just wanted to bring it to your attention. Hope you're good! Brycehughes ( talk) 03:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
It is beyond me why John von Neumann of all things has so many diehard defenders, but I'm of the opinion that they're well within "disruptive" territory. Besides the stonewalling and the personal attacks, we now have edit warring. At what point do you think an ANI discussion is appropriate to make this stop? Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis. I don't think we've really interacted but you're listed as someone to contact over at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment. I've only been involved in writing one GA myself so I'm iffy on how accurately I'd be able to make good decisions surrounding the process. Anyways, my concern is the article about Jehovah's Witnesses. The article is simultaneously tagged for having a reliance on primary sources and listed as a GA. After taking a look at the GA criteria to refamilarize myself with it, would that count as a 2b or maybe even 2c issue? I'm basing that intrepretation more on the reliable aspect than the cited part because obviously there are cited sources. For the possible c issue, I think there may be valid synthesis concerns in combination with that?
Ultimately, I think the easiest way to explain this might be to just illustrate what I mean by overreliance on primary sources. The article has a total of 435 cited references. The Watchtower is a publication that is produced by the religion itself; as well as anything cited to jw.org, the Watchtower Society, Insight on the Scriptures, Our Kingdom Ministry, etc. All of those sources combined is 168 of those 435 references. In your opinion, would this situation warrant a GAR? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
I was thinking about something you said recently. "Encyclopaedic writing and news/journalism writing are different, and have different purposes and conventions." I thought this was a good point and I was wondering if you know of a policy, guideline, essay, etc, which states this. Thanks! IOHANNVSVERVS ( talk) 04:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you Chipmonk for making your simplifications. The last user is some sort of highly qualified 'scientist' from USA who thinks that the ancient codes of centuries ago have some relevance to present science and so has been attempting to pervert this page with his high status perspective of whatever it is that he feels makes himself relevant to this world wide standard. He has been abusing his position for many years and so I am thankful to see someone else who has taken the time to correct the confusion that he has caused. Changes were made impossible through his convoluted methods of presenting information, when in fact it is or should be a simple affair with no need to mention anything about the three countries in the world who refuse to accept and implement the standards of the other 180+ nations.
I will support you should you wish to have someone who can take the time to keep these wikipages open and honest. I wish you the best of luck kk ( talk) 13:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I have no conflict of interest. Are you saying that because this account is used within a technology-based business, that we can't update, change, add to, or modify tech related articles? That's ridiculous. Teaminvise ( talk) 05:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This account is not a business account, anyone using this account will be doing so with direct supervision of the account owner, ie. I will be standing behind them any time the login is used; if the login is used by someone other than myself sitting directly in front of the screen. I don't believe Wikipedia has such policies regarding who specifically is sitting in front of the keyboard with the owner directly behind them. If this policy exists, please reference it. The original name I wanted, "Invise" is not available. For reference, IP addresses can edit articles and pages on Wikipedia, and IP address blocks can be purchased by corporations. This doesn't necessarily mean that the corporations themselves are the owner of the changes being made. IP addresses editing articles and pages are a huge part of Wikipedia and are a form of shared account access and a shared system of edits. No further comments will be made concerning this matter. Thank you.
– Teaminvise ( talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
On 30 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article East African Community, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 16:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello CMD - noted your 'on review' tag to CABG - but your name is not shown as reviewer? Are you reviewing the article? Thanks Iztwoz ( talk) 08:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I put the link on what seemed the most relevant page (as not my particular area) - and it mentioned a recent (November) change. Jackiespeel ( talk) 00:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you still disagreed with the removal of Noktundo from the List of territorial disputes page by the IP editor. If you have something good to say about the matter, it would be appreciated if you could join the discussion at Talk:List of territorial disputes to help form a consensus. — AP 499D25 (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey there & good day! I've been working on the Penang article for the past few weeks now & nominating it for GA. I was wondering if you're keen to help in its assessment? Thanks! hundenvonPG ( talk) 02:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
On 27 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Kamala (pictured), Percy Pringle and the Fabulous Freebirds got their first "big break" in International Championship Wrestling? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: NOTHING, and this is not because you did anything silly as well. Natsuikomin ( talk) 06:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
For your expert input in the Economy of Gaza City RM debate and for being an awesome Wikipedian! gidonb ( talk) 13:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC) |
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 45 • January 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello Chipmunkdavis, I wanted to let you know that I nominated the article Knowledge for featured article status, see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Knowledge/archive1. There has been little response so far and I was wondering whether you might be interested in taking a look. If you have the time, I would appreciate your comments. Phlsph7 ( talk) 08:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 46 • February 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis, I noticed the latest revision you have made on the article, Fish head curry. Some cited sources were removed from after your revision of the article, and your edit summary did not help much. Would like to find out why did you remove them. Thanks Deoma12 (Talk) 02:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis. Hope you are doing well. Well I and Keivan recently transcluded a peer review for the article William, Prince of Wales. So I thought that you could leave brief comments at the peer review discussion page. I approach you having seen your brief comments at the peer review for Liz Truss. Looking forward to knowing from you. Regards MSincccc ( talk) 13:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 47 • March 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis
I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.
Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna ( talk) 18:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
"and the inclusion of the coastal area of the Bahmani Kingdom or Sultanate also seems a matter of dispute" - that is my comment. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your comments. I appreciate your input a lot. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 14:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Shiny stuff |
Welcome! If you post on this page, I will respond on this page. If I post on your talk page, I will have it watchlisted for the duration of the conversation (and possibly longer!), but please feel free to ping me if I appear to have missed something.
Hi. On 02:26, 1 August 2023, you stated addressing me in the Talk:Russia#Removal of maps, "The article you referred to in this discussion was Haiti. Making a mass change across a number of articles to see where you won't get reverted is not a strong argument, and can become disruptive. If you want to cudgel someone about civility, do it on an admin noticeboard."
I will follow the steps listed on the civility policy, emphasizing that "editors should always treat each other with consideration and respect. They should focus on improving the encyclopedia while maintaining a pleasant editing environment by behaving politely, calmly and reasonably, even during heated debates." Accusing me or implying that I make "a mass change across a number of articles to see where you won't get reverted" is false and I feel it is an "ill-considered accusations of impropriety" ( WP:ICA).
I explained in the thread that my motivation adding the maps was because I felt there was an informational gap that needed to be addressed. For some reason you decided to imply I was just making the additions to see where I was not going to be reverted. Maybe we misunderstood each other? Can you clarify? Thanks. Thinker78 (talk) 04:04, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
curprev 19:19, 3 August 2011 Chipmunkdavis talk contribs m 2,498 bytes 0 moved Motherland (Mauritius National Anthem) to Motherland (anthem) over redirect: Per WP:NCDAB and WP:TITLE undothank
@ Chipmunkdavis: Hello, you reverted several edits which contained many additions and specifications, while also removed some unimportant parts from the text, but you provided only very vague explanation to your actions. Please note that edit warring is prohibited on Wikipedia, might result in block and cooperation is encouraged. I provided explanations for my edits, so please refrain from just reverting and discuss everything on Talk page to prevent edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cutoc ( talk • contribs) 02:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Just wondering about this editor .. Real4jyy.
Answering your question etc. I'm all for reverting, just wanted to know if you were in contact with him/her.
Thanks in advance. Bringingthewood ( talk) 04:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Okay. I'll leave things alone for now, maybe one day you'll get a response. Thank you for getting back to me so quickly. Enjoy your week! Bringingthewood ( talk) 20:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello CMD. Can you please check the following revisions of Philippines? They appear to include improper synthesis, or the claims therein are not directly supported by the cited sources. Moreover, the text contains detail better included in the child articles, and it has lengthened the article prose size. If possible, could you please revise the content (maybe the previous revisions before these could be restored, or the new claims are further summarized).
Thanks. Sanglahi86 ( talk) 14:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 August 29#Population of cities Moxy- 19:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Fat finger, or what? Bishonen | tålk 21:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC).
Hi @ Chipmunkdavis:, just checking, in your recent revert for the article Disneyland with the Death Penalty, a lot of the verbs was changed from past tense to present tense. Wouldn't past tense be more correct since the article is about a topic that happened in the past and is not happening now? Or was the tense just reverted along with other questionable content changes? Any objection for me changing it to past tense? Zhanzhao ( talk) 05:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey, we've interacted briefly over the years and I always thought you were cool as hell. I'm not sure if you are well-traveled or if you're just clever. I assume the latter. In any case, I've become attracted to Wikivoyage recently because the community is great, you don't feel like you're constantly in the trenches, and there's this sort of liberation feeling where you can write about the world, as truthfully as possible, without the burden of worrying about sourcing or phrasing. It's like a retirement Wikipedia. This is only to say that, the sort of interesting stuff that you're interested in here is the sort of stuff that requires attention there. Africa, for example. So, if you ever felt like contributing there I would ring the hallelujah bell, but regardless I just wanted to bring it to your attention. Hope you're good! Brycehughes ( talk) 03:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
It is beyond me why John von Neumann of all things has so many diehard defenders, but I'm of the opinion that they're well within "disruptive" territory. Besides the stonewalling and the personal attacks, we now have edit warring. At what point do you think an ANI discussion is appropriate to make this stop? Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:24, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Chipmunkdavis. I don't think we've really interacted but you're listed as someone to contact over at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment. I've only been involved in writing one GA myself so I'm iffy on how accurately I'd be able to make good decisions surrounding the process. Anyways, my concern is the article about Jehovah's Witnesses. The article is simultaneously tagged for having a reliance on primary sources and listed as a GA. After taking a look at the GA criteria to refamilarize myself with it, would that count as a 2b or maybe even 2c issue? I'm basing that intrepretation more on the reliable aspect than the cited part because obviously there are cited sources. For the possible c issue, I think there may be valid synthesis concerns in combination with that?
Ultimately, I think the easiest way to explain this might be to just illustrate what I mean by overreliance on primary sources. The article has a total of 435 cited references. The Watchtower is a publication that is produced by the religion itself; as well as anything cited to jw.org, the Watchtower Society, Insight on the Scriptures, Our Kingdom Ministry, etc. All of those sources combined is 168 of those 435 references. In your opinion, would this situation warrant a GAR? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
I was thinking about something you said recently. "Encyclopaedic writing and news/journalism writing are different, and have different purposes and conventions." I thought this was a good point and I was wondering if you know of a policy, guideline, essay, etc, which states this. Thanks! IOHANNVSVERVS ( talk) 04:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you Chipmonk for making your simplifications. The last user is some sort of highly qualified 'scientist' from USA who thinks that the ancient codes of centuries ago have some relevance to present science and so has been attempting to pervert this page with his high status perspective of whatever it is that he feels makes himself relevant to this world wide standard. He has been abusing his position for many years and so I am thankful to see someone else who has taken the time to correct the confusion that he has caused. Changes were made impossible through his convoluted methods of presenting information, when in fact it is or should be a simple affair with no need to mention anything about the three countries in the world who refuse to accept and implement the standards of the other 180+ nations.
I will support you should you wish to have someone who can take the time to keep these wikipages open and honest. I wish you the best of luck kk ( talk) 13:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
I have no conflict of interest. Are you saying that because this account is used within a technology-based business, that we can't update, change, add to, or modify tech related articles? That's ridiculous. Teaminvise ( talk) 05:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This account is not a business account, anyone using this account will be doing so with direct supervision of the account owner, ie. I will be standing behind them any time the login is used; if the login is used by someone other than myself sitting directly in front of the screen. I don't believe Wikipedia has such policies regarding who specifically is sitting in front of the keyboard with the owner directly behind them. If this policy exists, please reference it. The original name I wanted, "Invise" is not available. For reference, IP addresses can edit articles and pages on Wikipedia, and IP address blocks can be purchased by corporations. This doesn't necessarily mean that the corporations themselves are the owner of the changes being made. IP addresses editing articles and pages are a huge part of Wikipedia and are a form of shared account access and a shared system of edits. No further comments will be made concerning this matter. Thank you.
– Teaminvise ( talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
On 30 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article East African Community, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 16:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello CMD - noted your 'on review' tag to CABG - but your name is not shown as reviewer? Are you reviewing the article? Thanks Iztwoz ( talk) 08:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I put the link on what seemed the most relevant page (as not my particular area) - and it mentioned a recent (November) change. Jackiespeel ( talk) 00:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you still disagreed with the removal of Noktundo from the List of territorial disputes page by the IP editor. If you have something good to say about the matter, it would be appreciated if you could join the discussion at Talk:List of territorial disputes to help form a consensus. — AP 499D25 (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey there & good day! I've been working on the Penang article for the past few weeks now & nominating it for GA. I was wondering if you're keen to help in its assessment? Thanks! hundenvonPG ( talk) 02:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
On 27 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Kamala (pictured), Percy Pringle and the Fabulous Freebirds got their first "big break" in International Championship Wrestling? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, International Championship Wrestling (Mississippi)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 ( talk) 00:02, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: NOTHING, and this is not because you did anything silly as well. Natsuikomin ( talk) 06:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
For your expert input in the Economy of Gaza City RM debate and for being an awesome Wikipedian! gidonb ( talk) 13:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC) |
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 45 • January 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello Chipmunkdavis, I wanted to let you know that I nominated the article Knowledge for featured article status, see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Knowledge/archive1. There has been little response so far and I was wondering whether you might be interested in taking a look. If you have the time, I would appreciate your comments. Phlsph7 ( talk) 08:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 46 • February 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis, I noticed the latest revision you have made on the article, Fish head curry. Some cited sources were removed from after your revision of the article, and your edit summary did not help much. Would like to find out why did you remove them. Thanks Deoma12 (Talk) 02:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis. Hope you are doing well. Well I and Keivan recently transcluded a peer review for the article William, Prince of Wales. So I thought that you could leave brief comments at the peer review discussion page. I approach you having seen your brief comments at the peer review for Liz Truss. Looking forward to knowing from you. Regards MSincccc ( talk) 13:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
The Malaysia WikiProject Newsletter |
||
Issue 47 • March 2024 • About the Newsletter | ||
| ||
Past Newsletter • Newsroom • Malaysia Noticeboard • Malaysia Portal | ||
Newsletter written by Chongkian. You may opt-out of this monthly newsletter by removing your name here. |
Hello @ Chipmunkdavis
I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.
Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna ( talk) 18:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
"and the inclusion of the coastal area of the Bahmani Kingdom or Sultanate also seems a matter of dispute" - that is my comment. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your comments. I appreciate your input a lot. Ian (Wiki Ed) ( talk) 14:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)