Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and at peer review at the same time. Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. Please do not split featured list candidate pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings). The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegate, PresN, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will last at least ten days (though most last a month or longer) and may be lengthened where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:
It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support. After a reasonable time has passed, the director or delegates will decide when a nomination is ready to be closed. A
bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the Table of contents – Closing instructions – Checklinks – Dablinks – Check redirects – |
Featured list tools: | ||
Nomination procedure
Supporting and objecting Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.
|
Nominations urgently needing reviews
The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: |
Licensing information for the images (there are a lot of them) will be up shortly on the list talk page. The point of the list is so that people can enjoy learning some basic information about some trees that are common in North America (and many are common in temperate zones around the world). Feedback is welcome. - Dank ( push to talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Very excited to see a new plant list! Unfortunately, Dank, the trees are so pretty but that header is physically painful to look at. :( Most of the Notes column is empty space on my screen because the double images stretch the rows vertically; even just changing the notes column down to 15% and column 3 up to 7% (and dropping/shuffling some linebreaks) makes it much easier to read. If you don't want to do that, maybe find a way to shorten column 3 and 5's headers and stick more detail in footnotes?
Also:
!
, not |
, so !scope="row"
-- Pres N 02:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
After working on Rachelle Ann Go's list of songs and awards, here's another related list I am nominating. I've worked on her discography which spans her career as a pop artist in Philippines and her transition into musical theater. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 ( talk) 17:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This article comes as part of a series on Centre College's presidents that I have been working on for over two years now. After getting a handful of the biography articles to FA, I wanted to go ahead and try to get the list to featured as well - much of the format of this article was inspired by List of presidents of Georgetown University, also an FL. I hope that I have provided an adequate amount of detail on the office's history and the men who have occupied it. Any and all feedback would be much appreciated! PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 15:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi PCN02WPS, this is my first FLC contribution, so excuse me if I make a few mistakes.
Alright, getting close to finally wrapping up the first-round pick series. This list is nomination #9 in the series for me and, pending its promotion, would be #29 in the series to be promoted. This nomination's format matches that of other AFL team lists I've helped to promote, such as the Buffalo Bills. New England Patriots, and Tennessee Titans. As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I've been curious about reviewing one of these sports-related lists for a while now. Saving a spot for later. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 14:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
After working on 50 years of R&B number ones, I decided to take a break and jump to a different style of music - quite the switch from Prince to Connie Francis! Feedback as ever will be very gratefully received and very quickly acted upon! -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 09:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
Image review: Passed
Source review: Passed
The only thing I found was in the row for October 9. Should "Orchestra" be capitalized? In the source it says "His Orch.", so if we're matching the source we'd want both words capitalized. However I do think downcasing is the right option in this instance, as "His Orch."/"his Orchestra" are not proper names. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC and first candidate for a bronze star in general. I took inspiration from the style of User:Chompy Ace's numerous 'List of accolades received by....' FLs and have reworked the article extensively over the last few days. Sgubaldo ( talk) 19:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Great work on the list, not much more else for me to say! (I'm hoping to get a few more comments on a similar FLC of mine, if you have time down the road.) Best of luck, TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[[chess]] [[tournament]]
) which can be confusing to readers who may believe that they are one link. Their solution was to either reword it to read
tournament of
chess ([[tournament]] of [[chess]]
) or to use the more specific link of
chess tournament ([[chess tournament]]
). The word "film" can remain as part of the [[science fiction film]]
link if it's helpful, but the [[epic film]]
link directly before is the issue as it's separate from the link located directly after.
TheDoctorWho
(talk) 18:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list, and thanks for my credit as your inspiration! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 19:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC! I am nominating this for featured list because the Marvel Cinematic Universe is the highest-grossing film franchise and one of the most popular media franchises today. It has had a significant impact on the film industry and has a large following with various articles going into much detail on the different aspects that make up this franchise. This list outline provides a comprehensive breakdown of these working parts to help guide readers through navigating this multimedia franchise. I do want to stress that while some of these tables are transcluded from sub-articles, they have been designed with visual aid and navigation on this list in mind. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 04:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
Venezuela has three World Heritage Sites and three tentative sites. Standard style. The list for DR Congo is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 18:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this in the next couple days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC! I thought Connecticut needed more featured lists :). This is a list of all the senators and representatives to Congress from Connecticut since it became a US state in 1788. The list is modeled after another similar featured list, United States congressional delegations from Hawaii. Please let me know any feedback you might have; thank you! Staraction ( talk | contribs) 05:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
!scope=col
to each header cell, e.g. !rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup
instead. Same goes for row header cells, where the scope=row or rowgroup needs to be used.!scope="col"
, not ! !scope="col"
-
MPGuy2824 (
talk) 03:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Support! I also have an FLC about a state beginning with the letter C! So I figured I'd come here and review this one, especially since I enjoy politics. I compared the list to the three existing featured lists for state congressional delegations - Hawaii, Indiana, and Utah.
So that's it. I don't think any of the above should be that difficult, it's mostly me being nitpicky with what I expect out of a featured list. Please let met know if you have any comments, Staraction ( talk · contribs). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first time with En-Jungwon nominating a list article to a FL status. It is the ninth article in the series and the list follows the same pattern as previous lists. Suggestions for improvement are welcome. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this tonight or tomorrow. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is one more list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 44 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus ( talk) 17:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Here's my 50th nomination in this series. In this particular year some of the biggest names in R&B gained their first number ones: Mary J. Blige, TLC, and a guy I'm sure a lot of us would prefer not to have to think too much about but I guess you can't change history..... -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
Source review: Passed
Comments:
That's all I've got. Good stuff Chris, and congrats on hitting that milestone! Gonna have a large and awesome featured topic if you keep at it! Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
We continue through animals with #37 in our perpetual series of mammals lists: moles! Also shrew moles and desmans, collectively making up the family Talpidae. This is the second of four families of the order Eulipotyphla, and is the last easy one at 45 species. These guys are pretty well-known, despite living largely underground, though unfortunately we're missing free images for mostof the Asian ones. As always, this list follows the pattern of the previous lists and reflects previous FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N 15:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-expert prose review.
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this shortly. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Knuth, Hopcroft, Lamport, Aho – all authors of CS textbooks, and all winners of the “Nobel Prize of computer science”. My third FL nom; something different this time. I’ve improved the lead, table accessibility, and added a bunch of references. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Placeholder for image review. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone! I withdrew this page's nomination last year due to lack of time to address issues that could possibly be brought forward, but I believe I'm ready now. The column scopes in the tables have been fixed as asked before. Other than that, I think we are ready for the next steps. GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 19:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural comment
Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support. Your nomination on the List of cover versions of Coldplay songs has one support at the moment. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
First ever featured list nomination! I updated the list (additions/removals/tag changes) with current information, which can be found here (this is not a full list but rather an addendum update from 2023, so I also used the 2017 checklist to double check the tags). I also added photos, copyedited some of the families' descriptions, and added a description introducing the reader to New Brunswick and its geography. I took reference from the recently-promoted List of birds of Alberta and its nomination to make edits to the New Brunswick list, and reused a good amount of references to make sure each family description has citations here as well. Improving New Brunswick-related topics on Wikipedia has been my top priority since I began actively editing a year ago, and I'm more than happy to nominate this for featured list status. I do not have access to the book that the Alberta list nominator used for the family descriptions so I am more than happy to rewrite them if needed using alternate sources such as Birds of the World, which I have an institutional access to. B3251 ( talk) 04:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Great to see this! I took the List of Birds of Alberta to FL and I'm glad to see other Canadian provinces getting the same treatment!
Everything else looks great! grungaloo ( talk) 21:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Big fan of birds here. Always love seeing the cute little feathery critters whenever I'm out and about. I'll try to have an image review done within the next couple days :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 12:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
After bringing Rachelle Ann Go's list of roles and awards to FL status, here's another related list that I am nominating. This list includes songs she has recorded and released that span her two-decade career. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Great work overall, and I expect to support once the alt text is addressed. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
It is good to see you working with another! At a glance, the prose looks good to me and the table "contents" widget is working properly. I do not see any substantial issues apart from the following:
Current revision | Expected |
---|---|
"Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" | "Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" |
... | ... |
"I Will Always Love You Anyway" | "I Will Always Love You Anyway" |
"If" | "I'll Always Love You" |
"If You Don't Know Me by Now" | "I'm Sure" |
"If You Walk Away" | "If" |
"Ikaw Lang" | "If You Don't Know Me by Now" |
"I'll Always Love You" | "If You Walk Away" |
"I'm Sure" | "Ikaw Lang" |
"In Your Eyes" | "In Your Eyes" |
... | ... |
"Masasabi Mo Ba" | "Masasabi Mo Ba" |
"The Movie In My Mind" | "Missing You" |
"Missing You" | "The Movie in My Mind" |
"My Forever Love" | "My Forever Love" |
... | ... |
"Pagkakataon" | "Pagkakataon" |
"Palm Reader" | "Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" |
"Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" | "Palm Reader" |
"Promise Me" | "Promise Me" |
... | ... |
"You Kissed My Tears" | "You Kissed My Tears" |
That's all I have for this list, and I will happily support once everything is addressed. Great work, as always! Do ping me if you have addressed the above or have any comments. If you can spare some time, it would be great if you could take a look at my current FLC, which would be needing comments. – Relayed ( t • c) 16:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Source review: Passed
I don't love Spotify links, and I'd prefer a better source, but I recognize that contextually they verify the information they're being cited for. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This will be list #8 for me in this series and, hopefully, #28 in the series to be promoted. One of the charter members of the NFL and the oldest continuously run professional football franchise, this most resembles and copies the format of my previous nominations of List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks (a fellow charter member and second oldest franchise) and List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks (fifth oldest franchise). As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
I will taking ref numbers from this revision [3]. At first glance all refs seem to be from relaible sources. I'll begin manually checking them Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Good job on this. I'll try and get access to those sources I dont have to finish the review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Following a helpful Peer review, I hope this attempt at a comprehensive list of Grade I listed buildings in England dating from the 20th century is ready for FLC. I've ensured there is a corresponding article for every entry. I've not quite achieved that level of completeness with the images, with three missing. The usual sources couldn't help, and two have exceptionally light on-line presences. To explain my thinking on the order, I've taken a thematic approach; cathedrals/churches/war memorials/other memorials/houses/public buildings; and chronologically within those groups. The table is fully sortable. If nothing else, it will give interested editors the opportunity to derisively critique the inclusion of some structures, and enjoy suggesting their preferred alternatives. Any and all comments gratefully received. KJP1 ( talk) 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
|caption=your_caption_textas a template parameter.
I believe this article that I created to be of high quality and I would like to nominate it for FL. It is quite simple, but I believe it explains the topic well inline with contemporary lists. TheBritinator ( talk) 16:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
— RunningTiger123 ( talk) 00:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Taking a break from the Latin pop/tropical #1 singles while I work on the songs that reached #1 in 2001. I haven't mentioned, but I also love 80s music in Latin pop and tropical music formats. Since the Latin Pop Airplay didn't exist back then, I figured I'd do it by albums. As always, I look forward to addressing any issues! Erick ( talk) 15:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Leaving this here as a placeholder, will review shortly. – jona ✉ 18:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The latest in the series of professional snooker ranking list nominations. (I've been given permission to open another.) Steve Davis retained top place in the rankings, as he would for a while. Once again, the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association changed their mind about the basis of compilation after publishing the list, and revised it. I can provide extracts from relevant sources to reviewers. Thanks in advance for improvement suggestions. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 22:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Many thanks, MPGuy2824. Let me know if anythign else is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 08:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
Source review : Passed
I am nominating this for featured list because I moved to California, and was worried about how lacking the information on Wikipedia there was about tornadoes. You might not care about them because they're so common, but certain places get them more than others, and certain areas are more populated than others, so their effects might be disproportionately more impactful than, say, the middle of a corn field (which does happen a lot in California too). How often do they happen? And where? I'm glad you asked, because I wanted to figure out these questions, and more!
Caveat up front. First, it's been a few years since I've nominated anything. Second, I'm not 100% that I identified every individual tornado, as they're not always reported, or verified by a reliable source. I largely used the National Weather Service, the National Climatic Data Center, and on occasion, corroborating news sources. There are a few different types of weather events that are included, such as waterspouts which went from the water to land (thus making them an official tornado), fire whirls (or fire tornadoes, yes, that's a thing and they're terrifying), landspouts and gustnadoes. After a fairly extensive search over the last nine months or so, I'm fairly sure that the article is comprehensive, well-written, well-cited, formatted to the standards that are expected, all that good stuff that makes for a featured list. But I have my blinders on, and I fully acknowledge that I might've made a mistake here or there, in which case, I'd love to fix it. If you have any minor or large issues, I'll do my best to address them. And if you enjoyed the article, then thanks for the read. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Howdy HH, long time no talk! Hope you and yours are doing well. I'm saving this space for an image review; should be done in the next two to three days. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 09:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
! Year
becomes !scope=col | Year
.!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
| 1987
becomes !scope=row | 1987
(on its own line).Thanks for the comments, but sorry for the delay MPGuy2824 ( talk · contribs), it was a dank weekend.
♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone! I withdrew this page's nomination last year due to lack of time to address issues that could possibly be brought forward, but I believe I'm ready now. The most notable change since then was the removal of tribute projects, as they are now part of Cultural impact of Coldplay. With that said, allow me to recap some important points from the original discussion:
GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
All the notes other than the first one are not complete sentences so shouldn't have full stops -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 12:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
This is my second Marvel Cinematic Universe list I've nominated. While not the first to use credit scenes, the MCU popularized them for betrer or worse. -- Zoo Blazer 23:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
A great article with a detailed coverage about a popular culture topic (I didn't know this existed!). Looking at the lead, at 4 sentences, it appears to be short. Having said that, I would suggest that perhaps you utilize the History section as the article's lead since it pretty much sums up what the article is about and what is outlined in the tables for each phases. It should work well IMO, including the primary image. The other prose sections after the table should be fine.
Here are the rest of my comments on the prose:
Image review : Passed
Thanks for another great and helpful review Pseud 14! I think I've addressed everything. -- Zoo Blazer 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I think for accessibility purposes alt text for the image would be great. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Not much to say here, great work on the article! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. I have improved this significantly in the past few days. This is my third FLNom, so I feel as I owe it to reviewers to review other noms so I hope to slowly provide a few DBC and enventually provide full reviews. For the WikiCup my other active FLC is a co-nom with User:Lady Lotus Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, which aired on AMC, it premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022.Put a period after AMC and start a new sentence for the premiere and conclusion.
Over the course of the series, 63 episodes aired over six seasons--> 63 episodes aired over six seasons
The sixth season was split in two parts--> split into
That's all I've got. Looks pretty good overall. -- Zoo Blazer 19:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
That's all I have, not much to say! If you're still looking for additional candidates to review, I'm still looking for a few more on this one. Good work on the list, TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, which aired on AMC." → "Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould that aired on AMC."
It premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022." → "The series premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022." Since we're starting a new sentence and the following one also starts with "it" Done
In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Gilligan confirmed that the series would have a lighter tone than Breaking Bad." → "Gillan confirmed in October 2014 that the series would have a lighter tone than Breaking Bad." Typically, the publication source such as interviews are not notable or relevant. What is is who and when it was said, and the timeframe seems to be a beneficial aspect to include here instead of namedropping THR.
However, in November 2016 the season was reduced to 10 episodes." Add a comma between "2016" and "the". Done
{{Main|Better Call Saul season 1{{!}}''Better Call Saul'' season 1}}(for example). That intentionally makes the typically italicized title unitalicized when the rest of the plain text is italicized.
That will be it for me! Great work on this! Trailblazer101 ( talk) 03:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm back again with another hurricane season timeline! This time it's the 1994 Pacific hurricane season, which generated a trio of Category 5 hurricanes; that's a record for the most in one season, which still stands today (albeit having since been tied twice). One of them, John, became the farthest-traveling tropical cyclone ever recorded after it embarked on an 8,000-mile (!) voyage across the Pacific Ocean. I'm a little worried about the lede being too large, but I couldn't think of how to scale it back without excising valuable and relevant information. This was a more difficult endeavor than the 1993 EPAC timeline (FLC for that one is still in progress) because of a few data discrepancies that I have tried to address to the best of my ability. Overall, I believe that this timeline is up to the standard of the 1991 ATL timeline FL (promoted last week) and the aforementioned 1993 timeline, and I look forward to the community's feedback. I will do my best to address concerns in a timely manner. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll begin a review of this article very soon! My reviews tend to focus on prose and MOS issues, especially on the lede, but I will also comment on anything that could be improved. I'll post up some comments below over the next couple days, which you should either respond to, or ask me questions on issues you are unsure of. I'll be claiming points towards the wikicup once this review is over.
Additionally, if you liked this review, or are looking for items to review, I have some at my nominations list. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
I'm nominating this list because I think it's a well-formatted list and because it's my favorite team! The prose has been updated to give an overview of the team, the competitions they play in, and their history. The table gives a detailed overview of each season and their record. I took inspiration from List of Seattle Sounders FC seasons, which is a featured list for another MLS team. Brindille1 ( talk) 00:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
The DRC has five sites on the main list and for tentative sites. Four sites are listed as endangered. Standard style and formatting for WHS lists. The photos could be better but since these sites are somewhat more difficult to reach than in some other places, I guess what is currently on Commons will have to do. Feel free to suggest better alternatives. The list for Zimbabwe is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 09:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. It followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 ceremonies were written. PrinceofPunjab TALK 13:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
six couples received nominations that they shared together in their respective categoriesis just a random fact. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 18:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I promised a full review, so here's one now.
If you need help with any of this, I suggest reaching out to Birdienest81 – he's worked on a fair few of these lists. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, which was presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," to "
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," and I also suggest adding before Kimmel: "The ceremony was directed by Hamish Hamilton." Other than that, I think it may be having an over-reliance on notes, such as in the lead for Kimmel's prior hosting duties and for the Governor Awards' prior date, which could be converted into prose text. There are also plenty of references that would benefit from links to their websites. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 01:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm puzzled that many images have alt text solely consisting of a
full stop. Only the Kimmel image has any alt text more descriptive than that. I strongly recommend adding more descriptive alt text to the rest of the images in the listicle, including those that are grouped together by the {{multiple image}}
template; see
its documentation for details on adding alt text to such groups of images.
Other than that, all seems good:
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list I am hoping for enough feedback to get this promoted and learn how to format other elements of this set of list. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
{{
Infobox basketball biography}}
and {{
Infobox NFL biography}}
are examples of very widely used templates used in
WP:BLPs of current athletes. Other sports have similarly popular templates with equally prominent color usage. In general, team affiliation is considered a piece of information of extremely high encyclopedic importance. When a player is in the news regarding a trade or a signing, it is often highly contentious with edit warring and special sets of rules. Often page protection has to be invoked. We have seemed to condition the readers to assess team affiliation with both text and color presentation of the team affiliation. This is broadly done and commonly accepted across all sports on wikipedia. Others who spend a lot of time on sports might be able to give you more "color" (semi intentional pun) on this issue.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Links should clearly be identifiable as a link to our readers.- this table fails this. There are so many different colors for the text, you can't identify a link. From an accessibility side, some of the text colors on top of background colors are difficult to read: Susquehanna and Eastern New Mexico particularly. Regarding the use of color, it should be complementary. The use of team colors can be beneficial in a lot of ways. As example would be Buccaneers-Packers rivalry, the table at the end has coloring to show who won and lost, who led a specific decade, etc. We also utilize coloring to better identify a specific team, like the infobox of Green Bay Packers or the {{ Green Bay Packers}} template. This is minimal, but complementary use of color. What we have here is a ridiculous number of different schools and colorschemes. The really bad part is that there are so many different colors, that they can't be easily differentiated. Dartmouth, Oregon, Northwest Missouri, Illinois Wesleyan, Ark Tech, and Slippery Rock all have green background, with subtle differences in shade, with white text. From a quick pass, I can't differentiate the schools from each other, so what is the point of the colors? It doesn't help the reader at all. There are countless other examples of almost identical color schemes. Since the color serves no purpose, it is purely decorative (there is something like 73 different schools on this page, each with its own colors). Weighing the decorative nature of the coloring versus the current legibility, for me, it is detrimental the overall ability to read and understand the table. Colors can definitely be helpful, differentiating between two things, highlighting different awards won by people in a table, etc, but not like this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
! Year
becomes !scope=col | Year
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
| 1987
becomes !scope=row | 1987
(on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroupinstead.
Drive-by comment: Not to beat a dead horse too much here, but the colors here are plainly unacceptable. MOS:COLOR plainly states that pages should meet at least WCAG AA standards, which require a 4.5:1 contrast ratio between normal text and the background. Some glaring examples: Valdosta State has #000000 text on #CC0000 background, which has a contrast ratio of 3.56:1. Carnegie Mellon has #000000 on #990000, which is a ratio of 2.35:1. Susquehanna: #3366CC on #651C32 for 2.21:1. These are just the obvious examples; it's not fair to expect reviewers to check all of the color combinations. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 01:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
{{
CollegePrimaryStyle}}
and {{
NCAA color cell}}
. I am assuming the background is the primary color and am assessing cell-by-cell whether a non-white secondary color has sufficient contrast. I will get to the other tables within a couple of days unless this first table continues to have a negative consensus.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 12:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Year | University Division Winner | School | College Division Winner | School | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1987 | Kip Corrington | Texas A&M | Grant Jones | Denison | ||
1988 | Paul Sorenson | Dartmouth | David Gubbrud | Augustana (SD) |
That way all contrast issues are avoided and links can be their normal color. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Year | University Division Winner | School | College Division Winner | School | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1987 | Kip Corrington | Texas A&M | Grant Jones | Denison | ||||
1988 | Paul Sorenson | Dartmouth | David Gubbrud | Augustana (SD) |
{{
CollegeSecondaryStyle}}
and {{
CollegeSecondaryHex}}
} will pull the secondary color, unless if the secondary color is white, there is a good chance you will pull black (see Denison and Dartmouth, while Texas & AM is OK).-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 07:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)I've reworked this list for the past ten months so that it is fully referenced, verifiable and more accessible. Feedback will be taken into account and acted on as fast as possible. EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk) 20:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because its format is almost identical to another one (which is a newscast) with the same class, List of accolades received by 24 Oras. Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Great work with the article. Happy to support. -- Zoo Blazer 07:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
That's it! Sgubaldo ( talk) 20:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Formatting
Reliability
Verifiability
I'll stop here, as there are issues with missing nominees that need to be fixed. I see other years i.e. 2006 where Nene Tamayo is nominated for Best New Female TV Personality, which is also not in the table. Each of the years where sources are available should be revisited. I'll be willing to look at it again, but will not make any declaration for now. Pseud 14 ( talk) 18:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the newest UEFA competition and has been a welcome addition to the European football calendar. I'm going to address the big sticking point immediately which is that there are only two entries, soon to be three in a couple of months. The competition is new and guaranteed to run for more years to come, so although it's a small list at the moment, it will swell over the years. While I recognise this may be an issue, I do think this fact should be enough to ensure it doesn't fall foul of the guidelines NapHit ( talk) 21:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I think, the reason this isn't being reviewed is because there are only two entries. This list is probably better off as a section of the UEFA Europa Conference League article for the time-being. I am going to nominate it for a merge. Idiosincrático ( talk) 06:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
@ NapHit:
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the version of the article right now is not as good as the 2017 version, and lots of the text is outdated and not supported by sources. In the FL version [5], all the tables had sources for every team, but these have been removed, in violation of WP:VERIFY. This is enough to automatically fail this review in my opinion, as it isn't easily fixable. There are also multiple issues with the lead, including:
Mumbai Indians have won five titles.[31] Chennai Super Kings have won five titles and Kolkata Knight Riders have won two titles, Gujarat Titans, Sunrisers Hyderabad and Rajasthan Royals, apart from former team Deccan Chargers, are the other teams to have won the tournament title as of May 2023.Not supported by the sources, which are mostly from 2016. People have updated the number of wins but not the source itself.
Altogether, thirteen teams have played in the past ten seasons of the IPL tournament.Out-of-date, as there have been 16 completed seasons (and this would need source update too). That whole paragraph is also way too overdetailed about team histories- the lead is meant to summarise the content of the lists, whereas this provides too much information.
The tables themselves have multiple problems too:
As such, this doesn't currently meet the FL criteria, and so should be considered for de-listing unless significant corrections are made. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:
The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:
While the National Football League (NFL) does not recognize the Browns’ AAFC championships, the Pro Football Hall of Fame does recognize the team’s championships, which is reflected in this list.)
The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and at peer review at the same time. Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. Please do not split featured list candidate pages into subsections using header code (if necessary, use bolded headings). The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegate, PresN, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will last at least ten days (though most last a month or longer) and may be lengthened where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. Consensus is built among reviewers and nominators; the directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:
It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve critical comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support. After a reasonable time has passed, the director or delegates will decide when a nomination is ready to be closed. A
bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived; the delay in bot processing can range from minutes to several days, and the Table of contents – Closing instructions – Checklinks – Dablinks – Check redirects – |
Featured list tools: | ||
Nomination procedure
Supporting and objecting Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.
|
Nominations urgently needing reviews
The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: |
Licensing information for the images (there are a lot of them) will be up shortly on the list talk page. The point of the list is so that people can enjoy learning some basic information about some trees that are common in North America (and many are common in temperate zones around the world). Feedback is welcome. - Dank ( push to talk) 21:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Very excited to see a new plant list! Unfortunately, Dank, the trees are so pretty but that header is physically painful to look at. :( Most of the Notes column is empty space on my screen because the double images stretch the rows vertically; even just changing the notes column down to 15% and column 3 up to 7% (and dropping/shuffling some linebreaks) makes it much easier to read. If you don't want to do that, maybe find a way to shorten column 3 and 5's headers and stick more detail in footnotes?
Also:
!
, not |
, so !scope="row"
-- Pres N 02:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
After working on Rachelle Ann Go's list of songs and awards, here's another related list I am nominating. I've worked on her discography which spans her career as a pop artist in Philippines and her transition into musical theater. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 ( talk) 17:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This article comes as part of a series on Centre College's presidents that I have been working on for over two years now. After getting a handful of the biography articles to FA, I wanted to go ahead and try to get the list to featured as well - much of the format of this article was inspired by List of presidents of Georgetown University, also an FL. I hope that I have provided an adequate amount of detail on the office's history and the men who have occupied it. Any and all feedback would be much appreciated! PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 15:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi PCN02WPS, this is my first FLC contribution, so excuse me if I make a few mistakes.
Alright, getting close to finally wrapping up the first-round pick series. This list is nomination #9 in the series for me and, pending its promotion, would be #29 in the series to be promoted. This nomination's format matches that of other AFL team lists I've helped to promote, such as the Buffalo Bills. New England Patriots, and Tennessee Titans. As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I've been curious about reviewing one of these sports-related lists for a while now. Saving a spot for later. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 14:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
After working on 50 years of R&B number ones, I decided to take a break and jump to a different style of music - quite the switch from Prince to Connie Francis! Feedback as ever will be very gratefully received and very quickly acted upon! -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 09:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
Image review: Passed
Source review: Passed
The only thing I found was in the row for October 9. Should "Orchestra" be capitalized? In the source it says "His Orch.", so if we're matching the source we'd want both words capitalized. However I do think downcasing is the right option in this instance, as "His Orch."/"his Orchestra" are not proper names. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC and first candidate for a bronze star in general. I took inspiration from the style of User:Chompy Ace's numerous 'List of accolades received by....' FLs and have reworked the article extensively over the last few days. Sgubaldo ( talk) 19:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Great work on the list, not much more else for me to say! (I'm hoping to get a few more comments on a similar FLC of mine, if you have time down the road.) Best of luck, TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[[chess]] [[tournament]]
) which can be confusing to readers who may believe that they are one link. Their solution was to either reword it to read
tournament of
chess ([[tournament]] of [[chess]]
) or to use the more specific link of
chess tournament ([[chess tournament]]
). The word "film" can remain as part of the [[science fiction film]]
link if it's helpful, but the [[epic film]]
link directly before is the issue as it's separate from the link located directly after.
TheDoctorWho
(talk) 18:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list, and thanks for my credit as your inspiration! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 19:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC! I am nominating this for featured list because the Marvel Cinematic Universe is the highest-grossing film franchise and one of the most popular media franchises today. It has had a significant impact on the film industry and has a large following with various articles going into much detail on the different aspects that make up this franchise. This list outline provides a comprehensive breakdown of these working parts to help guide readers through navigating this multimedia franchise. I do want to stress that while some of these tables are transcluded from sub-articles, they have been designed with visual aid and navigation on this list in mind. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 04:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
Venezuela has three World Heritage Sites and three tentative sites. Standard style. The list for DR Congo is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 18:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this in the next couple days. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:12, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first FLC! I thought Connecticut needed more featured lists :). This is a list of all the senators and representatives to Congress from Connecticut since it became a US state in 1788. The list is modeled after another similar featured list, United States congressional delegations from Hawaii. Please let me know any feedback you might have; thank you! Staraction ( talk | contribs) 05:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
!scope=col
to each header cell, e.g. !rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup
instead. Same goes for row header cells, where the scope=row or rowgroup needs to be used.!scope="col"
, not ! !scope="col"
-
MPGuy2824 (
talk) 03:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Support! I also have an FLC about a state beginning with the letter C! So I figured I'd come here and review this one, especially since I enjoy politics. I compared the list to the three existing featured lists for state congressional delegations - Hawaii, Indiana, and Utah.
So that's it. I don't think any of the above should be that difficult, it's mostly me being nitpicky with what I expect out of a featured list. Please let met know if you have any comments, Staraction ( talk · contribs). ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This is my first time with En-Jungwon nominating a list article to a FL status. It is the ninth article in the series and the list follows the same pattern as previous lists. Suggestions for improvement are welcome. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 18:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this tonight or tomorrow. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is one more list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 44 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus ( talk) 17:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Here's my 50th nomination in this series. In this particular year some of the biggest names in R&B gained their first number ones: Mary J. Blige, TLC, and a guy I'm sure a lot of us would prefer not to have to think too much about but I guess you can't change history..... -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 21:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
Source review: Passed
Comments:
That's all I've got. Good stuff Chris, and congrats on hitting that milestone! Gonna have a large and awesome featured topic if you keep at it! Hey man im josh ( talk) 15:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
We continue through animals with #37 in our perpetual series of mammals lists: moles! Also shrew moles and desmans, collectively making up the family Talpidae. This is the second of four families of the order Eulipotyphla, and is the last easy one at 45 species. These guys are pretty well-known, despite living largely underground, though unfortunately we're missing free images for mostof the Asian ones. As always, this list follows the pattern of the previous lists and reflects previous FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N 15:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-expert prose review.
Placeholder for image review; will start looking at this shortly. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Knuth, Hopcroft, Lamport, Aho – all authors of CS textbooks, and all winners of the “Nobel Prize of computer science”. My third FL nom; something different this time. I’ve improved the lead, table accessibility, and added a bunch of references. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Placeholder for image review. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 17:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone! I withdrew this page's nomination last year due to lack of time to address issues that could possibly be brought forward, but I believe I'm ready now. The column scopes in the tables have been fixed as asked before. Other than that, I think we are ready for the next steps. GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 19:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural comment
Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support. Your nomination on the List of cover versions of Coldplay songs has one support at the moment. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
First ever featured list nomination! I updated the list (additions/removals/tag changes) with current information, which can be found here (this is not a full list but rather an addendum update from 2023, so I also used the 2017 checklist to double check the tags). I also added photos, copyedited some of the families' descriptions, and added a description introducing the reader to New Brunswick and its geography. I took reference from the recently-promoted List of birds of Alberta and its nomination to make edits to the New Brunswick list, and reused a good amount of references to make sure each family description has citations here as well. Improving New Brunswick-related topics on Wikipedia has been my top priority since I began actively editing a year ago, and I'm more than happy to nominate this for featured list status. I do not have access to the book that the Alberta list nominator used for the family descriptions so I am more than happy to rewrite them if needed using alternate sources such as Birds of the World, which I have an institutional access to. B3251 ( talk) 04:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Great to see this! I took the List of Birds of Alberta to FL and I'm glad to see other Canadian provinces getting the same treatment!
Everything else looks great! grungaloo ( talk) 21:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Big fan of birds here. Always love seeing the cute little feathery critters whenever I'm out and about. I'll try to have an image review done within the next couple days :) Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 12:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
After bringing Rachelle Ann Go's list of roles and awards to FL status, here's another related list that I am nominating. This list includes songs she has recorded and released that span her two-decade career. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 ( talk) 14:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Great work overall, and I expect to support once the alt text is addressed. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 21:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
It is good to see you working with another! At a glance, the prose looks good to me and the table "contents" widget is working properly. I do not see any substantial issues apart from the following:
Current revision | Expected |
---|---|
"Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" | "Alam ng Ating Mga Puso" |
... | ... |
"I Will Always Love You Anyway" | "I Will Always Love You Anyway" |
"If" | "I'll Always Love You" |
"If You Don't Know Me by Now" | "I'm Sure" |
"If You Walk Away" | "If" |
"Ikaw Lang" | "If You Don't Know Me by Now" |
"I'll Always Love You" | "If You Walk Away" |
"I'm Sure" | "Ikaw Lang" |
"In Your Eyes" | "In Your Eyes" |
... | ... |
"Masasabi Mo Ba" | "Masasabi Mo Ba" |
"The Movie In My Mind" | "Missing You" |
"Missing You" | "The Movie in My Mind" |
"My Forever Love" | "My Forever Love" |
... | ... |
"Pagkakataon" | "Pagkakataon" |
"Palm Reader" | "Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" |
"Palad Mo sa Puso Ko" | "Palm Reader" |
"Promise Me" | "Promise Me" |
... | ... |
"You Kissed My Tears" | "You Kissed My Tears" |
That's all I have for this list, and I will happily support once everything is addressed. Great work, as always! Do ping me if you have addressed the above or have any comments. If you can spare some time, it would be great if you could take a look at my current FLC, which would be needing comments. – Relayed ( t • c) 16:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Source review: Passed
I don't love Spotify links, and I'd prefer a better source, but I recognize that contextually they verify the information they're being cited for. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This will be list #8 for me in this series and, hopefully, #28 in the series to be promoted. One of the charter members of the NFL and the oldest continuously run professional football franchise, this most resembles and copies the format of my previous nominations of List of Chicago Bears first-round draft picks (a fellow charter member and second oldest franchise) and List of Detroit Lions first-round draft picks (fifth oldest franchise). As always, I will do my best to response quickly to address any and all concerns that are brought up. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
I will taking ref numbers from this revision [3]. At first glance all refs seem to be from relaible sources. I'll begin manually checking them Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 16:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Good job on this. I'll try and get access to those sources I dont have to finish the review. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 17:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Following a helpful Peer review, I hope this attempt at a comprehensive list of Grade I listed buildings in England dating from the 20th century is ready for FLC. I've ensured there is a corresponding article for every entry. I've not quite achieved that level of completeness with the images, with three missing. The usual sources couldn't help, and two have exceptionally light on-line presences. To explain my thinking on the order, I've taken a thematic approach; cathedrals/churches/war memorials/other memorials/houses/public buildings; and chronologically within those groups. The table is fully sortable. If nothing else, it will give interested editors the opportunity to derisively critique the inclusion of some structures, and enjoy suggesting their preferred alternatives. Any and all comments gratefully received. KJP1 ( talk) 13:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
|caption=your_caption_textas a template parameter.
I believe this article that I created to be of high quality and I would like to nominate it for FL. It is quite simple, but I believe it explains the topic well inline with contemporary lists. TheBritinator ( talk) 16:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
— RunningTiger123 ( talk) 00:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Taking a break from the Latin pop/tropical #1 singles while I work on the songs that reached #1 in 2001. I haven't mentioned, but I also love 80s music in Latin pop and tropical music formats. Since the Latin Pop Airplay didn't exist back then, I figured I'd do it by albums. As always, I look forward to addressing any issues! Erick ( talk) 15:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Leaving this here as a placeholder, will review shortly. – jona ✉ 18:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The latest in the series of professional snooker ranking list nominations. (I've been given permission to open another.) Steve Davis retained top place in the rankings, as he would for a while. Once again, the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association changed their mind about the basis of compilation after publishing the list, and revised it. I can provide extracts from relevant sources to reviewers. Thanks in advance for improvement suggestions. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 22:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Many thanks, MPGuy2824. Let me know if anythign else is needed. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose ( talk) 08:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Image review: Passed
Source review : Passed
I am nominating this for featured list because I moved to California, and was worried about how lacking the information on Wikipedia there was about tornadoes. You might not care about them because they're so common, but certain places get them more than others, and certain areas are more populated than others, so their effects might be disproportionately more impactful than, say, the middle of a corn field (which does happen a lot in California too). How often do they happen? And where? I'm glad you asked, because I wanted to figure out these questions, and more!
Caveat up front. First, it's been a few years since I've nominated anything. Second, I'm not 100% that I identified every individual tornado, as they're not always reported, or verified by a reliable source. I largely used the National Weather Service, the National Climatic Data Center, and on occasion, corroborating news sources. There are a few different types of weather events that are included, such as waterspouts which went from the water to land (thus making them an official tornado), fire whirls (or fire tornadoes, yes, that's a thing and they're terrifying), landspouts and gustnadoes. After a fairly extensive search over the last nine months or so, I'm fairly sure that the article is comprehensive, well-written, well-cited, formatted to the standards that are expected, all that good stuff that makes for a featured list. But I have my blinders on, and I fully acknowledge that I might've made a mistake here or there, in which case, I'd love to fix it. If you have any minor or large issues, I'll do my best to address them. And if you enjoyed the article, then thanks for the read. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 20:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Howdy HH, long time no talk! Hope you and yours are doing well. I'm saving this space for an image review; should be done in the next two to three days. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 09:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
! Year
becomes !scope=col | Year
.!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
| 1987
becomes !scope=row | 1987
(on its own line).Thanks for the comments, but sorry for the delay MPGuy2824 ( talk · contribs), it was a dank weekend.
♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 19:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello everyone! I withdrew this page's nomination last year due to lack of time to address issues that could possibly be brought forward, but I believe I'm ready now. The most notable change since then was the removal of tribute projects, as they are now part of Cultural impact of Coldplay. With that said, allow me to recap some important points from the original discussion:
GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
All the notes other than the first one are not complete sentences so shouldn't have full stops -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 12:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
This is my second Marvel Cinematic Universe list I've nominated. While not the first to use credit scenes, the MCU popularized them for betrer or worse. -- Zoo Blazer 23:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
A great article with a detailed coverage about a popular culture topic (I didn't know this existed!). Looking at the lead, at 4 sentences, it appears to be short. Having said that, I would suggest that perhaps you utilize the History section as the article's lead since it pretty much sums up what the article is about and what is outlined in the tables for each phases. It should work well IMO, including the primary image. The other prose sections after the table should be fine.
Here are the rest of my comments on the prose:
Image review : Passed
Thanks for another great and helpful review Pseud 14! I think I've addressed everything. -- Zoo Blazer 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I think for accessibility purposes alt text for the image would be great. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Not much to say here, great work on the article! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. I have improved this significantly in the past few days. This is my third FLNom, so I feel as I owe it to reviewers to review other noms so I hope to slowly provide a few DBC and enventually provide full reviews. For the WikiCup my other active FLC is a co-nom with User:Lady Lotus Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, which aired on AMC, it premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022.Put a period after AMC and start a new sentence for the premiere and conclusion.
Over the course of the series, 63 episodes aired over six seasons--> 63 episodes aired over six seasons
The sixth season was split in two parts--> split into
That's all I've got. Looks pretty good overall. -- Zoo Blazer 19:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
That's all I have, not much to say! If you're still looking for additional candidates to review, I'm still looking for a few more on this one. Good work on the list, TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, which aired on AMC." → "Better Call Saul is an American television drama series created by Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould that aired on AMC."
It premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022." → "The series premiered in 2015 and concluded in 2022." Since we're starting a new sentence and the following one also starts with "it" Done
In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Gilligan confirmed that the series would have a lighter tone than Breaking Bad." → "Gillan confirmed in October 2014 that the series would have a lighter tone than Breaking Bad." Typically, the publication source such as interviews are not notable or relevant. What is is who and when it was said, and the timeframe seems to be a beneficial aspect to include here instead of namedropping THR.
However, in November 2016 the season was reduced to 10 episodes." Add a comma between "2016" and "the". Done
{{Main|Better Call Saul season 1{{!}}''Better Call Saul'' season 1}}(for example). That intentionally makes the typically italicized title unitalicized when the rest of the plain text is italicized.
That will be it for me! Great work on this! Trailblazer101 ( talk) 03:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm back again with another hurricane season timeline! This time it's the 1994 Pacific hurricane season, which generated a trio of Category 5 hurricanes; that's a record for the most in one season, which still stands today (albeit having since been tied twice). One of them, John, became the farthest-traveling tropical cyclone ever recorded after it embarked on an 8,000-mile (!) voyage across the Pacific Ocean. I'm a little worried about the lede being too large, but I couldn't think of how to scale it back without excising valuable and relevant information. This was a more difficult endeavor than the 1993 EPAC timeline (FLC for that one is still in progress) because of a few data discrepancies that I have tried to address to the best of my ability. Overall, I believe that this timeline is up to the standard of the 1991 ATL timeline FL (promoted last week) and the aforementioned 1993 timeline, and I look forward to the community's feedback. I will do my best to address concerns in a timely manner. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 00:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll begin a review of this article very soon! My reviews tend to focus on prose and MOS issues, especially on the lede, but I will also comment on anything that could be improved. I'll post up some comments below over the next couple days, which you should either respond to, or ask me questions on issues you are unsure of. I'll be claiming points towards the wikicup once this review is over.
Additionally, if you liked this review, or are looking for items to review, I have some at my nominations list. Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
MPGuy2824
I'm nominating this list because I think it's a well-formatted list and because it's my favorite team! The prose has been updated to give an overview of the team, the competitions they play in, and their history. The table gives a detailed overview of each season and their record. I took inspiration from List of Seattle Sounders FC seasons, which is a featured list for another MLS team. Brindille1 ( talk) 00:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
!rowspan=2|Season
becomes !scope=col rowspan=2|Season
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
The DRC has five sites on the main list and for tentative sites. Four sites are listed as endangered. Standard style and formatting for WHS lists. The photos could be better but since these sites are somewhat more difficult to reach than in some other places, I guess what is currently on Commons will have to do. Feel free to suggest better alternatives. The list for Zimbabwe is already seeing some support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 09:29, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. It followed how the 1929, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 ceremonies were written. PrinceofPunjab TALK 13:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
six couples received nominations that they shared together in their respective categoriesis just a random fact. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 18:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I promised a full review, so here's one now.
If you need help with any of this, I suggest reaching out to Birdienest81 – he's worked on a fair few of these lists. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, which was presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," to "
The 96th Academy Awards ceremony, presented by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)," and I also suggest adding before Kimmel: "The ceremony was directed by Hamish Hamilton." Other than that, I think it may be having an over-reliance on notes, such as in the lead for Kimmel's prior hosting duties and for the Governor Awards' prior date, which could be converted into prose text. There are also plenty of references that would benefit from links to their websites. Trailblazer101 ( talk) 01:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm puzzled that many images have alt text solely consisting of a
full stop. Only the Kimmel image has any alt text more descriptive than that. I strongly recommend adding more descriptive alt text to the rest of the images in the listicle, including those that are grouped together by the {{multiple image}}
template; see
its documentation for details on adding alt text to such groups of images.
Other than that, all seems good:
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list I am hoping for enough feedback to get this promoted and learn how to format other elements of this set of list. TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
{{
Infobox basketball biography}}
and {{
Infobox NFL biography}}
are examples of very widely used templates used in
WP:BLPs of current athletes. Other sports have similarly popular templates with equally prominent color usage. In general, team affiliation is considered a piece of information of extremely high encyclopedic importance. When a player is in the news regarding a trade or a signing, it is often highly contentious with edit warring and special sets of rules. Often page protection has to be invoked. We have seemed to condition the readers to assess team affiliation with both text and color presentation of the team affiliation. This is broadly done and commonly accepted across all sports on wikipedia. Others who spend a lot of time on sports might be able to give you more "color" (semi intentional pun) on this issue.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 19:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Links should clearly be identifiable as a link to our readers.- this table fails this. There are so many different colors for the text, you can't identify a link. From an accessibility side, some of the text colors on top of background colors are difficult to read: Susquehanna and Eastern New Mexico particularly. Regarding the use of color, it should be complementary. The use of team colors can be beneficial in a lot of ways. As example would be Buccaneers-Packers rivalry, the table at the end has coloring to show who won and lost, who led a specific decade, etc. We also utilize coloring to better identify a specific team, like the infobox of Green Bay Packers or the {{ Green Bay Packers}} template. This is minimal, but complementary use of color. What we have here is a ridiculous number of different schools and colorschemes. The really bad part is that there are so many different colors, that they can't be easily differentiated. Dartmouth, Oregon, Northwest Missouri, Illinois Wesleyan, Ark Tech, and Slippery Rock all have green background, with subtle differences in shade, with white text. From a quick pass, I can't differentiate the schools from each other, so what is the point of the colors? It doesn't help the reader at all. There are countless other examples of almost identical color schemes. Since the color serves no purpose, it is purely decorative (there is something like 73 different schools on this page, each with its own colors). Weighing the decorative nature of the coloring versus the current legibility, for me, it is detrimental the overall ability to read and understand the table. Colors can definitely be helpful, differentiating between two things, highlighting different awards won by people in a table, etc, but not like this. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
|+ caption_textas the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting
|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}instead.
!scope=colto each header cell, e.g.
! Year
becomes !scope=col | Year
. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroupinstead.
!scope=rowto each primary cell, e.g.
| 1987
becomes !scope=row | 1987
(on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroupinstead.
Drive-by comment: Not to beat a dead horse too much here, but the colors here are plainly unacceptable. MOS:COLOR plainly states that pages should meet at least WCAG AA standards, which require a 4.5:1 contrast ratio between normal text and the background. Some glaring examples: Valdosta State has #000000 text on #CC0000 background, which has a contrast ratio of 3.56:1. Carnegie Mellon has #000000 on #990000, which is a ratio of 2.35:1. Susquehanna: #3366CC on #651C32 for 2.21:1. These are just the obvious examples; it's not fair to expect reviewers to check all of the color combinations. RunningTiger123 ( talk) 01:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
{{
CollegePrimaryStyle}}
and {{
NCAA color cell}}
. I am assuming the background is the primary color and am assessing cell-by-cell whether a non-white secondary color has sufficient contrast. I will get to the other tables within a couple of days unless this first table continues to have a negative consensus.-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 12:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Year | University Division Winner | School | College Division Winner | School | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1987 | Kip Corrington | Texas A&M | Grant Jones | Denison | ||
1988 | Paul Sorenson | Dartmouth | David Gubbrud | Augustana (SD) |
That way all contrast issues are avoided and links can be their normal color. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 02:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Year | University Division Winner | School | College Division Winner | School | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1987 | Kip Corrington | Texas A&M | Grant Jones | Denison | ||||
1988 | Paul Sorenson | Dartmouth | David Gubbrud | Augustana (SD) |
{{
CollegeSecondaryStyle}}
and {{
CollegeSecondaryHex}}
} will pull the secondary color, unless if the secondary color is white, there is a good chance you will pull black (see Denison and Dartmouth, while Texas & AM is OK).-
TonyTheTiger (
T /
C /
WP:FOUR /
WP:CHICAGO /
WP:WAWARD) 07:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)I've reworked this list for the past ten months so that it is fully referenced, verifiable and more accessible. Feedback will be taken into account and acted on as fast as possible. EnthusiastWorld37 ( talk) 20:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list because its format is almost identical to another one (which is a newscast) with the same class, List of accolades received by 24 Oras. Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Great work with the article. Happy to support. -- Zoo Blazer 07:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
That's it! Sgubaldo ( talk) 20:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Formatting
Reliability
Verifiability
I'll stop here, as there are issues with missing nominees that need to be fixed. I see other years i.e. 2006 where Nene Tamayo is nominated for Best New Female TV Personality, which is also not in the table. Each of the years where sources are available should be revisited. I'll be willing to look at it again, but will not make any declaration for now. Pseud 14 ( talk) 18:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
This is the newest UEFA competition and has been a welcome addition to the European football calendar. I'm going to address the big sticking point immediately which is that there are only two entries, soon to be three in a couple of months. The competition is new and guaranteed to run for more years to come, so although it's a small list at the moment, it will swell over the years. While I recognise this may be an issue, I do think this fact should be enough to ensure it doesn't fall foul of the guidelines NapHit ( talk) 21:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I think, the reason this isn't being reviewed is because there are only two entries. This list is probably better off as a section of the UEFA Europa Conference League article for the time-being. I am going to nominate it for a merge. Idiosincrático ( talk) 06:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
@ NapHit:
I am nominating this for featured list removal because the version of the article right now is not as good as the 2017 version, and lots of the text is outdated and not supported by sources. In the FL version [5], all the tables had sources for every team, but these have been removed, in violation of WP:VERIFY. This is enough to automatically fail this review in my opinion, as it isn't easily fixable. There are also multiple issues with the lead, including:
Mumbai Indians have won five titles.[31] Chennai Super Kings have won five titles and Kolkata Knight Riders have won two titles, Gujarat Titans, Sunrisers Hyderabad and Rajasthan Royals, apart from former team Deccan Chargers, are the other teams to have won the tournament title as of May 2023.Not supported by the sources, which are mostly from 2016. People have updated the number of wins but not the source itself.
Altogether, thirteen teams have played in the past ten seasons of the IPL tournament.Out-of-date, as there have been 16 completed seasons (and this would need source update too). That whole paragraph is also way too overdetailed about team histories- the lead is meant to summarise the content of the lists, whereas this provides too much information.
The tables themselves have multiple problems too:
As such, this doesn't currently meet the FL criteria, and so should be considered for de-listing unless significant corrections are made. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 13:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:
The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:
While the National Football League (NFL) does not recognize the Browns’ AAFC championships, the Pro Football Hall of Fame does recognize the team’s championships, which is reflected in this list.)
The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)