Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Can only find passing mentions in match reports. Redirect to 2010 World Cup squad. Simione001 ( talk) 03:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of [1] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.
The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Video game engine used in a handful of games circa 2003. No actual coverage whatsoever. My redirect was correctly undone as it is not mentioned in the target article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD countered. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, articles about primary schools are only kept if they can be shown to meet WP:NORG. That is not the case here. Indeed, this is an article about a kindergarten. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I do not know much about taxes, but I believe this topic may already be covered by Lump-sum tax. I am not certain if they are actually redundant. What do you think? If so, I recommend a redirect to Lump-sum tax. HenryMP02 ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This article has had zero independent sources cited since it was created six years ago. I am unable to find any significant discussion of the organization in reliable sources. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be it's own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, it's been a minute since I made this, and I can't say this is a proud accomplishment of mine. Back then, "nominating a well-respected bureaucrat for adminship" was a funnier idea in my head, perhaps, and my young self wasn't sure how to deliver. I don't feel strongly about deleting it entirely, so if people would rather move this to an April Fools subpage that's fine, but I'd prefer this not have to keep this as a user subpage. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy as an A11 was contested (courtesy @ CanonNi and Whpq:), but it's a G5 ( Editer344 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). Rather than re-tag, bringing here for more eyes. I don't see a path toward article space for this draft. Star Mississippi 02:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 03:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Can only find passing mentions in match reports. Redirect to 2010 World Cup squad. Simione001 ( talk) 03:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of [1] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.
The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Video game engine used in a handful of games circa 2003. No actual coverage whatsoever. My redirect was correctly undone as it is not mentioned in the target article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
PROD countered. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, articles about primary schools are only kept if they can be shown to meet WP:NORG. That is not the case here. Indeed, this is an article about a kindergarten. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I do not know much about taxes, but I believe this topic may already be covered by Lump-sum tax. I am not certain if they are actually redundant. What do you think? If so, I recommend a redirect to Lump-sum tax. HenryMP02 ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This article has had zero independent sources cited since it was created six years ago. I am unable to find any significant discussion of the organization in reliable sources. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be it's own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Well, it's been a minute since I made this, and I can't say this is a proud accomplishment of mine. Back then, "nominating a well-respected bureaucrat for adminship" was a funnier idea in my head, perhaps, and my young self wasn't sure how to deliver. I don't feel strongly about deleting it entirely, so if people would rather move this to an April Fools subpage that's fine, but I'd prefer this not have to keep this as a user subpage. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy as an A11 was contested (courtesy @ CanonNi and Whpq:), but it's a G5 ( Editer344 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). Rather than re-tag, bringing here for more eyes. I don't see a path toward article space for this draft. Star Mississippi 02:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 03:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)