From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.


Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Purge server cache

Myth of superabundance

Myth of superabundance (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pak Chol-jin

Pak Chol-jin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Can only find passing mentions in match reports. Redirect to 2010 World Cup squad. Simione001 ( talk) 03:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820)

Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV fork of [1] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Wesley Grammar School

Wesley Grammar School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ping @ Rich Smith, @ FatCat96, @ Aydoh8, @ Indefensible and @ GraziePrego who participated previously, and @ Liz who draftified for the second time. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Some sources are interviews and not online sources. Thus, references were not attached. Samuel Ola ( talk) 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Interwiews are a primary source, in order for the article to be kept we need "significant coverage from reliable secondary sources". 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep There is a distinct lack of sourcing on the page, but we are told it was established in 1956 so this is a well established school, and this is born out by having an active old students association (WESGOSA) which helps verify several notable alumni already listed, including the first lady of Ghana [2]. So this is a school with significant notable alumni. It is also the case study school in this Ph.D. thesis [3] on learning styles and academic performance in Biology. This study [4] also uses the school as the experimental group in their study on teaching trigonometry. Although the secondary information about the schools in these studies is limited, they do add to the case that the school is significant, well established and of note within the community. There is also a lot of news paper coverage, as noted above. Those are primary sources. What remains lacking at this point is a good secondary source that verifies the information already on the page. If we had that, this would be a clear keep. I have not found that yet, but I think there is a suitable case, based on the notable alumni, the active old student association, and the academic references, to argue this crosses the line. (ETA: We do have this history, from a newspaper, written on the occasion of the school being 50 years old. [5] ) Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete - for me there just are not enough suitable sources for !keep. I agree one might think there are sources for a school of this age, however I do not think we can move from draft without suitable sourcing. Given that it has moved back and forth from draft to main, it seems like the best option is !delete until such time someone can rewrite with sufficient sources to satisfy the AfC process. JMWt ( talk) 11:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Actually yes, I had not spotted that draft back-and-forth. Perhaps the performer of the move can comment. On the basis of the lack of in page sourcing yet repeat moving to mainspace (making draftify unavailable as an ATD) I would be inclined to move to delete pending some explanation on that. Is there a redirect ATD available? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 12:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Samuel Ola: Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 12:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pashtunistan conflict

Pashtunistan conflict (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.

The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Okay I'll give more information about the invasion and I think it's pretty notable enough to have it's own page Waleed Ukranian ( talk) 04:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply
By renaming the article and changing the topic To Pashtunistan conflict the scope of article has changed, the article has known importance about the history of confrontation's between both countries, it should be given time as this requires a lot of work and hence shouldn't be deleted. Rahim231 ( talk) 13:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Enigma Engine

Enigma Engine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game engine used in a handful of games circa 2003. No actual coverage whatsoever. My redirect was correctly undone as it is not mentioned in the target article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirect again or delete: The features description is hardly encyclopedic and the one source is an interview. IgelRM ( talk) 20:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

IEEE Lance Stafford Larson Award

IEEE Lance Stafford Larson Award (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Why would it be less noteworthy than the ACM SRC, the APS Apker Award or the Morgan Prize? Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 11:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm not sure what any of those are either, to be honest. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
ACM Student Research Competition, LeRoy Apker Award, Morgan Prize. All student research awards that are regarded as very prestigious in their respective fields of CS, physics and mathematics. Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment I still struggle to see how the additional listed sources above, who all read as "X has won the award", contribute to notability. The simple existence of an award and the fact that it is indeed awarded does not mean it deserves a page on Wikipedia. Broc ( talk) 08:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Take a look at: List of IEEE awards. What coverage is there about e.g. the IEEE Richard Harold Kaufmann Award, except for award announcements?
    By the standard you are advocating, no prizes except for the Nobel, Turing, Abel, Fields and Breakthrough Prize deserve a page. Yet, others, like the Kaufmann Award, exist because they are thought of as highly indicative of great work within their respective fields - who often are too niche and specizaized to receive attention outside of award announcements. Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 13:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Please avoid WP:WHATABOUTX, we are discussing this specific page, not other ones. Broc ( talk) 12:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

List of football clubs in Wallis and Futuna

List of football clubs in Wallis and Futuna (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sabir Alasgarov

Sabir Alasgarov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sarah Junior School

Sarah Junior School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD countered. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, articles about primary schools are only kept if they can be shown to meet WP:NORG. That is not the case here. Indeed, this is an article about a kindergarten. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Fixed tax

Fixed tax (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not know much about taxes, but I believe this topic may already be covered by Lump-sum tax. I am not certain if they are actually redundant. What do you think? If so, I recommend a redirect to Lump-sum tax. HenryMP02 ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Lifechanyuan International Family Society

Lifechanyuan International Family Society (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has had zero independent sources cited since it was created six years ago. I am unable to find any significant discussion of the organization in reliable sources. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Canada. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Delete There's a little bit out there on this company, but not from reliable sources. I can't see the full text of the Martin Boewe doctoral thesis; if it has RS citations perhaps that could save this article, but where those citations would come from is anyone's guess. As it is, it's possibly eligible for CSD G11 (blatant promotion). Oblivy ( talk) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Lifechanyuan started from Zimbabwe when Xuefeng lived there and the 1st Second Home was built in Yunnan China so most of the theory(Lifechanyuan values) and introduction articles are in Chinese, with only a small portion of its theory and introductory articles translated into English, that's why the sources of the information is difficult to find.
    Dr. Martin Boewe and his wife visited the 4th branch of the Second Home in 2012, during which they had an interview with founder Xuefeng, here are the links for his interview (1-3):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZg4JWQwCzw&t=151s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKQ3e1_wjgs&t=17s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaiwPsSqt3k&t=360s
    It is imperative to accurately convey what Lifechanyuan truly represents to the world, without misunderstanding or misleading the public. As a member of Lifechanyuan for nearly 18 years, I aim to share the truth based on the past 16 years of practice of the Second Home, spanning from China to Canada. Tongxincao ( talk) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    If there are Chinese language secondary sources that meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources, then you should offer them up here. A YouTube interview with the founder is not going to do it. Oblivy ( talk) 04:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Iran at the 2026 Asian Games

Iran at the 2026 Asian Games (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Redirects

Shuggie

No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shoob

This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shoo-in

No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shman

No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shadow Dio

No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sexy flash

Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Self loading freight

Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scrmable

Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scranton lax

No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Marco Scocco

No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scientific sexism

"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scary sharp

No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Saturday Rocks

No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ali O'Shea and etc.

A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • I will note, for navigation purposes, the titles in this nomination are sorted from oldest at the top and newest at the bottom. Some of the older titles do have a light history, but none of the newer ones do (i.e. nothing after the year 2008 has any history). And for those that do have history, a good chunk have either been through an AfD, are so minor that they were redirected in various short periods of time, or both. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sanju Bhagat

No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Samlor mcheu

No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

S from Hell

No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rute Gunnay

No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rush (Leland Remix)

No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

RTV News Inc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Roshutsu

Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ross and Rachel (song)

No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Roses (SoMo song)

No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Romantic Homicide (Jaden Hossler song)

No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rockman 4 Minus Infinity

This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rkkody

No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. He is actually mentioned. According to CBS News this was Chuck Humphrey's cult name. Humphrey is mentioned here. I could add a mention this was his name in the group, if you'd like? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 01:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Riksenergi

No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Redwop

No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Recursive X-Y cut

No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be it's own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rail transport in Socotra

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Rail transport in X is one of those topics we have myriad links for for historical (cultural?) reasons, unlike horse plane and spaceships. Suspect this is one of those. I lean towards delete, but not strongly. CMD ( talk) 01:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per my arguments in the previous discussion. This is misleading due to the target not discussing this topic. -- Tavix ( talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete - Per nom. I find it a bit funny for such a redirect to exist, especially because this island has literally no infrastructure Abo Yemen 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rail Sim Pro

No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rachel Inns

No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

R@ygold

No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Quantum realm

Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Support I read a lot of QM and "realm" is not common.
Johnjbarton ( talk) 04:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

User:Utopes/Requests for adminship/Xaosflux

User:Utopes/Requests for adminship/Xaosflux ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – ( View MfD)​

Well, it's been a minute since I made this, and I can't say this is a proud accomplishment of mine. Back then, "nominating a well-respected bureaucrat for adminship" was a funnier idea in my head, perhaps, and my young self wasn't sure how to deliver. I don't feel strongly about deleting it entirely, so if people would rather move this to an April Fools subpage that's fine, but I'd prefer this not have to keep this as a user subpage. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

(This isn't U1 because not all previous titles were in userspace. In other news, wee 30k 💀.) As it's probably good to notify, sorry for MfDing your incredibly real request for adminship @ Xaosflux:. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Copy notation

Draft:Copy notation ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – ( View MfD)​

Speedy as an A11 was contested (courtesy @ CanonNi and Whpq:), but it's a G5 ( Editer344 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). Rather than re-tag, bringing here for more eyes. I don't see a path toward article space for this draft. Star Mississippi 02:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as a non-notable topic created as a draft by an editor evading scrutiny using multiple accounts. -- Whpq ( talk) 03:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: obviously made up. Could not find any sources mentioning "copy notation" online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 03:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Deletion review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.


Speedy deletion candidates

Articles

Purge server cache

Myth of superabundance

Myth of superabundance (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pak Chol-jin

Pak Chol-jin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Can only find passing mentions in match reports. Redirect to 2010 World Cup squad. Simione001 ( talk) 03:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820)

Maratha-Rajput conflict (1800-1820) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV fork of [1] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Wesley Grammar School

Wesley Grammar School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ping @ Rich Smith, @ FatCat96, @ Aydoh8, @ Indefensible and @ GraziePrego who participated previously, and @ Liz who draftified for the second time. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Some sources are interviews and not online sources. Thus, references were not attached. Samuel Ola ( talk) 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Interwiews are a primary source, in order for the article to be kept we need "significant coverage from reliable secondary sources". 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 ( talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep There is a distinct lack of sourcing on the page, but we are told it was established in 1956 so this is a well established school, and this is born out by having an active old students association (WESGOSA) which helps verify several notable alumni already listed, including the first lady of Ghana [2]. So this is a school with significant notable alumni. It is also the case study school in this Ph.D. thesis [3] on learning styles and academic performance in Biology. This study [4] also uses the school as the experimental group in their study on teaching trigonometry. Although the secondary information about the schools in these studies is limited, they do add to the case that the school is significant, well established and of note within the community. There is also a lot of news paper coverage, as noted above. Those are primary sources. What remains lacking at this point is a good secondary source that verifies the information already on the page. If we had that, this would be a clear keep. I have not found that yet, but I think there is a suitable case, based on the notable alumni, the active old student association, and the academic references, to argue this crosses the line. (ETA: We do have this history, from a newspaper, written on the occasion of the school being 50 years old. [5] ) Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Weak delete - for me there just are not enough suitable sources for !keep. I agree one might think there are sources for a school of this age, however I do not think we can move from draft without suitable sourcing. Given that it has moved back and forth from draft to main, it seems like the best option is !delete until such time someone can rewrite with sufficient sources to satisfy the AfC process. JMWt ( talk) 11:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Actually yes, I had not spotted that draft back-and-forth. Perhaps the performer of the move can comment. On the basis of the lack of in page sourcing yet repeat moving to mainspace (making draftify unavailable as an ATD) I would be inclined to move to delete pending some explanation on that. Is there a redirect ATD available? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 12:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    @ Samuel Ola: Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 12:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Pashtunistan conflict

Pashtunistan conflict (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.

The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Okay I'll give more information about the invasion and I think it's pretty notable enough to have it's own page Waleed Ukranian ( talk) 04:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply
By renaming the article and changing the topic To Pashtunistan conflict the scope of article has changed, the article has known importance about the history of confrontation's between both countries, it should be given time as this requires a lot of work and hence shouldn't be deleted. Rahim231 ( talk) 13:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Enigma Engine

Enigma Engine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Video game engine used in a handful of games circa 2003. No actual coverage whatsoever. My redirect was correctly undone as it is not mentioned in the target article. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Redirect again or delete: The features description is hardly encyclopedic and the one source is an interview. IgelRM ( talk) 20:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

IEEE Lance Stafford Larson Award

IEEE Lance Stafford Larson Award (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Why would it be less noteworthy than the ACM SRC, the APS Apker Award or the Morgan Prize? Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 11:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
I'm not sure what any of those are either, to be honest. Oaktree b ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply
ACM Student Research Competition, LeRoy Apker Award, Morgan Prize. All student research awards that are regarded as very prestigious in their respective fields of CS, physics and mathematics. Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Comment I still struggle to see how the additional listed sources above, who all read as "X has won the award", contribute to notability. The simple existence of an award and the fact that it is indeed awarded does not mean it deserves a page on Wikipedia. Broc ( talk) 08:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Take a look at: List of IEEE awards. What coverage is there about e.g. the IEEE Richard Harold Kaufmann Award, except for award announcements?
    By the standard you are advocating, no prizes except for the Nobel, Turing, Abel, Fields and Breakthrough Prize deserve a page. Yet, others, like the Kaufmann Award, exist because they are thought of as highly indicative of great work within their respective fields - who often are too niche and specizaized to receive attention outside of award announcements. Heraldicdam1 ( talk) 13:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Please avoid WP:WHATABOUTX, we are discussing this specific page, not other ones. Broc ( talk) 12:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

List of football clubs in Wallis and Futuna

List of football clubs in Wallis and Futuna (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sabir Alasgarov

Sabir Alasgarov (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sarah Junior School

Sarah Junior School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD countered. Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, articles about primary schools are only kept if they can be shown to meet WP:NORG. That is not the case here. Indeed, this is an article about a kindergarten. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Fixed tax

Fixed tax (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not know much about taxes, but I believe this topic may already be covered by Lump-sum tax. I am not certain if they are actually redundant. What do you think? If so, I recommend a redirect to Lump-sum tax. HenryMP02 ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Lifechanyuan International Family Society

Lifechanyuan International Family Society (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has had zero independent sources cited since it was created six years ago. I am unable to find any significant discussion of the organization in reliable sources. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Canada. ... discospinster talk 01:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Delete There's a little bit out there on this company, but not from reliable sources. I can't see the full text of the Martin Boewe doctoral thesis; if it has RS citations perhaps that could save this article, but where those citations would come from is anyone's guess. As it is, it's possibly eligible for CSD G11 (blatant promotion). Oblivy ( talk) 02:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    Lifechanyuan started from Zimbabwe when Xuefeng lived there and the 1st Second Home was built in Yunnan China so most of the theory(Lifechanyuan values) and introduction articles are in Chinese, with only a small portion of its theory and introductory articles translated into English, that's why the sources of the information is difficult to find.
    Dr. Martin Boewe and his wife visited the 4th branch of the Second Home in 2012, during which they had an interview with founder Xuefeng, here are the links for his interview (1-3):
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZg4JWQwCzw&t=151s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKQ3e1_wjgs&t=17s
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaiwPsSqt3k&t=360s
    It is imperative to accurately convey what Lifechanyuan truly represents to the world, without misunderstanding or misleading the public. As a member of Lifechanyuan for nearly 18 years, I aim to share the truth based on the past 16 years of practice of the Second Home, spanning from China to Canada. Tongxincao ( talk) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
    If there are Chinese language secondary sources that meet Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sources, then you should offer them up here. A YouTube interview with the founder is not going to do it. Oblivy ( talk) 04:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Iran at the 2026 Asian Games

Iran at the 2026 Asian Games (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Redirects

Shuggie

No mention of "Shuggie" as a nickname at the target article. Could also be confused with Shruggie. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shoob

This is a meme slang term not mentioned at the target article, as garnered from the edit summary and rcats. Not useful in its current form as we have no further information about the term of "shoob" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shoo-in

No mention of this word at the target, although it's pointed here since 2012. Perhaps a wiktionary redirect would be more appropriate? Not sure if there are other encyclopedic topics where this title could be a shoo-in.... :) Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shman

No mention of the term "shman" at the target article. Pertaining to more pronounceable versions, sheman has a different target, while all external search engines were pointing me to topics related to shaman. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Shadow Dio

No mention of this variant of Dio at the target article, as the word "shadow" never appears at any point. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sexy flash

Not called a "sexy flash" at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Self loading freight

Vague term not mentioned at the target. While passengers might "load themselves onto an airplane", from a literal perspective anything that can move by itself is self-moving freight, and will not always be a passenger. Someone searching this term is very likely looking for something particularly specific, and if they really wanted to see the article for "passenger", they'd just look up "passenger" instead. Seems like keeping this as a blue link would be a disservice towards potential article creation for a transportation operator lingo. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scrmable

Is otherwise confusing, and would never be searched with this term to reach the target page. Also not mentioned, so users would have no idea why this term goes here instead of being an r from typo. If letter transpositions are considered good to target to the base word, this redirect insists that is not the case, as it considers "Scrmable" to be a separate topic to "Scramble" (correctly, imo!). Scramble is not a hard word to spell, so it would not benefit from having a typo in this style aimed there, especially because "scrmable" does not sound like "scramble" at all. On the flipside, because "scrmable" isn't mentioned at the target article either, it's not useful in its current form as it stands. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scranton lax

No mention of "lax" or a lax team at the target, inferred from history. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Marco Scocco

No mention of this passenger at the target article, and is not a useful redirect on its lonesome without context as to who this person is. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scientific sexism

"Scientific" is only said once in the lead, and "sexism" only appears once in the body, both in entirely different situations. While listed as an alternative name, there is nothing in the article to indicate that this is the case, and there seems like there'd be other sexism articles that this could refer to, as there are also mentions of "scientific" at sexism as well. Seems as if this is an otherwise ambiguous term that has a lot of possibilities due to the lack of clarity between "science" and "sexism". Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Scary sharp

No mention of a "scary sharp" method of sharpening at the title. The word "scary" does not appear at the target, and the only time "sharp" appears is in the form of "sharpening", but nothing about a "sharp" on it's own. Non-notable technique which was BLAR'd this time last year. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Saturday Rocks

No mention of a children's programming "Saturday Rocks" at the title. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ali O'Shea and etc.

A list of characters from Fair City not mentioned at the target in any form. In these cases for Fair City redirects, my interpretation a "mention" is generous; this is just a list of names on a table that are only said once, but nevertheless at least they exist, and sometimes the boxes might make allusions to characters that didn't even MAKE a table entry. But for the titles included in this nomination, they cannot say the same re: having even a bare bones namedrop. They either appear nowhere on this list, or are an alternative name mentioned nowhere on this list. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • I will note, for navigation purposes, the titles in this nomination are sorted from oldest at the top and newest at the bottom. Some of the older titles do have a light history, but none of the newer ones do (i.e. nothing after the year 2008 has any history). And for those that do have history, a good chunk have either been through an AfD, are so minor that they were redirected in various short periods of time, or both. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sanju Bhagat

No mention of "sanju" or "bhagat" at the target, or any context of his case of fetus in fetu. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Samlor mcheu

No mention at the target, and could not find evidence of this spelling missing a vowel, and including an extra e. Seems implausible to me, although perhaps content at the page or a translation could clear this up. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

S from Hell

No mention of this meme, or "hell", at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rute Gunnay

No mention of "Rute" or "Gunnay" mentioned at the target article, hasn't had content at this title since 2006. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rush (Leland Remix)

No mention of "Leland" or a remix of Rush is mentioned at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

RTV News Inc.

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

No mention of RTV News at the target article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Roshutsu

Seems to be an alternate language version of exhibitionism, not mentioned at the target, and with no strong association to the target outside of what would be expected of WP:RLANG. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Ross and Rachel (song)

No mention of "Ross" or "Rachel" at the target singer's page, but also no mention at Jake Miller discography either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Roses (SoMo song)

No mention of a song called Roses at the target article, not a helpful redirect and indicates that we have content when we don't. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Romantic Homicide (Jaden Hossler song)

No mention of this song, "Romantic", or "Homicide" at the target article. The existence of a redirect indicates content that we don't have on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rockman 4 Minus Infinity

This ROM hack is not discussed at the target. No mention of "Minus", "infinity", "ROM", or "Hack" at the target page. The existence of a redirect indicates content at the target that we don't have and is never addressed, making this not a very useful redirect. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rkkody

No mention of this former cult member at the target article, in any form, it seems. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Keep. He is actually mentioned. According to CBS News this was Chuck Humphrey's cult name. Humphrey is mentioned here. I could add a mention this was his name in the group, if you'd like? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 01:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Riksenergi

No mention of this fictional agency/company (derived from the deleted categories) at the target role-playing game. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Redwop

No mention or context as to what "redwop" is at the target article. Seems to be a company based on external searches, but such a company is not discussed at the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Recursive X-Y cut

No mention of "recursive", "x-y" or "cut" at the target article. Used to be it's own article, but this seems to be a topic that isn't discussed at the overarching topic of "bitmaps". Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rail transport in Socotra

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

We have nothing to say about rail transport at the target article. Anyone that types in "rail transport in socotra" but doesn't click on the article or glosses over the unrelated info about minibuses (on a hunt to find information on rail transport) will get the faulty impression that rail transport is discussed at the target. We don't have redirects for topics that DON'T exist on an island, and aren't mentioned as not existing. We wouldn't have Horse transport in Socotra, Plane transport in Socotra, or Spaceship transport in Socotra just because "the article says minibus transport, so therefore it's helpful to know that these don't exist." Alternatively, a red link is more explicit that a topic doesn't exist, as it doesn't make people question the topic's existence, and think "Why does this redirect exist if rail transport doesn't, is the article wrong? Surely there must be something to explain this discrepancy..." Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Rail transport in X is one of those topics we have myriad links for for historical (cultural?) reasons, unlike horse plane and spaceships. Suspect this is one of those. I lean towards delete, but not strongly. CMD ( talk) 01:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per my arguments in the previous discussion. This is misleading due to the target not discussing this topic. -- Tavix ( talk) 01:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Delete - Per nom. I find it a bit funny for such a redirect to exist, especially because this island has literally no infrastructure Abo Yemen 03:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rail Sim Pro

No mention of "Rail", "Sim" or "Pro" at the target article. Was redirected here after a 2015 AfD as an "obvious alternative to AfD", but this topic seems to have never been discussed at the target before, and certainly not after. Not a helpful redirect in its current form. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Rachel Inns

No mention of Inns at the target article. Used to exist standalone, before being redirected into the list where it was presumably mentioned, but no longer. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

R@ygold

No mention of "raygold" or "r@ygold" at the target article. Seems to be a tagline or username, maybe, although I haven't looked too far into how incorporable this topic might be into the article. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Quantum realm

Realms are not discussed at the target page. With the existing of a conflicting Quantum Realm, there's no diffcaps differentiation in topics. Should have matching targets, with a hatnote at Features of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, not the other way around. Utopes ( talk / cont) 00:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Support I read a lot of QM and "realm" is not common.
Johnjbarton ( talk) 04:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

User:Utopes/Requests for adminship/Xaosflux

User:Utopes/Requests for adminship/Xaosflux ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – ( View MfD)​

Well, it's been a minute since I made this, and I can't say this is a proud accomplishment of mine. Back then, "nominating a well-respected bureaucrat for adminship" was a funnier idea in my head, perhaps, and my young self wasn't sure how to deliver. I don't feel strongly about deleting it entirely, so if people would rather move this to an April Fools subpage that's fine, but I'd prefer this not have to keep this as a user subpage. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

(This isn't U1 because not all previous titles were in userspace. In other news, wee 30k 💀.) As it's probably good to notify, sorry for MfDing your incredibly real request for adminship @ Xaosflux:. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Copy notation

Draft:Copy notation ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – ( View MfD)​

Speedy as an A11 was contested (courtesy @ CanonNi and Whpq:), but it's a G5 ( Editer344 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)). Rather than re-tag, bringing here for more eyes. I don't see a path toward article space for this draft. Star Mississippi 02:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as a non-notable topic created as a draft by an editor evading scrutiny using multiple accounts. -- Whpq ( talk) 03:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: obviously made up. Could not find any sources mentioning "copy notation" online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 03:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Deletion review


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook