This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them Eastern Europe or the Balkans post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles COVID-19, broadly construed pseudoscience and fringe science Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts complementary and alternative medicine abortion governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes) She should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Please reply on your talk page if you're not extended confirmed and need to reply to my messages.

Please add my Talk page to the Temporary semi-protections for Persistent sockpuppetry. Thanks, - LuckyLouie ( talk) 20:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

for the page protection request. I didn't even know you could do that 😄 Knitsey ( talk) 20:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I've known about it for a while. :^) LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 20:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Now I know! If I need it again do I just ask at page protection? I've requested pp before but it never occured to me that it can be applied to talk pages. Knitsey ( talk) 20:44, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Yeah, you just ask for it. Most of the times it'll be granted. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 20:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Come on, Liliana. I've now had to 1) warn you for no-summary rollbacking a comment that had first been removed by the person it criticized, 2) revert this utterly gratuitous shit-stirring, and 3) hat these forum-y political comments, all at AN/I; the first and second were in particularly frought and sensitive threads, at that. AN/I is a noticeboard where users dealing with serious or chronic disruption go to report their issues to administrators and to those non-admin community members who have something useful to add. If you continue to disrupt that process I will p-block you from the noticeboard. -- Tamzin^{[ cetacean needed} (she|they|xe) 07:10, 28 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I have a hard time with words, so please don't take the way I'm wording this the wrong way, but I'm sorry. I won't post cringe anymore. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 07:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I see you closed my ANI, but I still have questions that haven't be resolved. Can you reopen? Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 18:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Of course. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 18:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Looks like you can close it now. Thanks so much! Nemov ( talk) 18:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: hello LilianaUwU. you have been trouted — Preceding unsigned comment added by DimensionalFusion ( talk • contribs)

Come on, DimensionalFusion, it's not nice to trout without signing... LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 23:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Here, have a signature @ LilianaUwU :3

DimensionalFusion (talk) 23:31, 15 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for keeping an eye on the Karine Jean-Pierre‎ page. The obsession these accounts have with her is really depressing and emblematic of the larger problems in the US at the moment. Viriditas ( talk) 01:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello there!

If you had a fursona, what species would it be and why? Brat Forelli ( talk) 19:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Brat Forelli: Probably a cat. I already consider myself a catgirl, after all. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 20:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm part of the Transfem Cabal now, when do I get my membership card and complimentary goodie bag? :3 – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 05:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

dudhhr: Second door to the left. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 05:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

great, now I'm in my living room, without a card or goodie bag. – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 05:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Dammit. Uh, it should be arriving in 6 to 8 weeks. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 05:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

wait, you know my address? Off to oversight you go. – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 05:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I thought every trans woman had a trans address book? LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 05:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Oh, true. I guess that comes in the goodie bag I haven't gotten yet. Is that right? – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 05:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Indeed. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 05:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

it's been seven and a half months, and I haven't gotten my goodie bag yet. Did you mean 6 to 8 months, or should I file a complaint against the Transfem Cabal's Goodie Bag Department? – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 21:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I dunno, I haven't gotten mine... and it's been almost six years. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 21:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

maybe you should file a complaint! – dudhhr  ^talk _contribs^she_her 22:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I really should. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 22:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Cloudy142 the user page, do you think it's an attack page or bio? I was going to use CSD then thought I would get a second opinion. Knitsey ( talk) 09:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Knitsey, that's definitely G10. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 09:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Done, thank you, Knitsey ( talk) 09:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

These are not in keeping with Wikipedia's principles:

• "not only did you not improve the article, but you also have a COI? ok, sure"
• "ISSUES. NOT. ADDRESSED"

Please use summaries to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes, and without being intentionally abrasive or shouting. Daniel Quinlan ( talk) 18:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC) reply

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979  → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply

There is currently a Request Move discussion about William IV. Since you participated in the previous move discussion involving William IV, I thought you might want to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 ( talk) 19:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Of course I can edit your talkpage, I'm omnipotent after all. XD A09 ( talk) 16:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junlper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junlper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paragon Deku ( talk) 16:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I apologize for the response on my talk page. I did not mean to offend you when referring to you in the DRV as the "appellant" or using the "their" possessive pronoun. When editing on the project I never use gender specific he/she pronouns to refer to other editors because I do not want to misgender. I see now that it is important to you so I will remember if I we find ourselves in the same threads in the future. Lightburst ( talk) 16:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Yeah, it's fine. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 16:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC) reply

For canvasing and battleground behavior related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M43 (Durban) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F102 highway (Nigeria), you have been blocked for a week. I particularly find the attempted retaliation here to be beyond the pale. This block was almost and indef because of it. Since it is based on private information, this block counts as a Checkuser block. I am willing to share the evidence of canvasing with any CU who is reviewing the block. Additionally, the evidence has been sent to arbcom-en. You may appeal this block directly to arbcom or via the unblock template. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:12, 20 October 2023 (UTC) reply

I am so happy you are back. Wikipedia is blessed by your presence!

Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 01:54, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi LilianaUwU, I'm not sure if all of these should be more-or-less blindly reverted. I'm currently failing to find a consensus for QLDer in NSW's mass adition of what 73.27.191.165 has removed (see also the bottom of User_talk:QLDer in NSW#73.27.191.165's_reverts, permanent link). If you know of one, please let me know. When in doubt, WP:BURDEN and WP:ONUS probably apply. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ ToBeFree: I could always self-revert. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm afraid that would be the best approach for now; I lack background information about the current consensus if one exists. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

We are currently discussing this on the Republican Party's talk page; we have been for months now. QLDer in NSW ( talk) 02:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

QLDer in NSW, are you saying there is no consensus and you (silently?) did this during a running discussion, in the background? ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:16, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Pinging Drmies because he reverted one of my self reverts. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

No. These are old edits. QLDer in NSW ( talk) 02:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I restored the edit cause it seemed like a perfectly acceptable edit to me. Drmies ( talk) 02:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

So did I, but I guess it's a mess of a situation I happened upon, which seems to happen a bit too often on here. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Yes, that was where I was coming from too. AntiDionysius ( talk) 18:23, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Mh. What a chaos. I guess blocking 73.27.191.165 for 31 hours wasn't too horrible of a decision, but this all is a mess. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:19, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Ah well, September. Noone had objected to these until now, but that might have been caused by a lack of attention. (Re-)adding the disputed content without a citation and apparently without the article content supporting it either (such as in Special:Diff/1184699703?) may perhaps not be the best approach, but I may also be overlooking something. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ ToBeFree, @ QLDer in NSW: I found two discussions ( here, here) on Talk:Republican Party (United States). LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much. Chronological order: Special:Diff/1173457636, Special:Diff/1173462906, Special:Diff/1173467553, 10 days of silence, first reply to the discussion. I'm not sure how to describe this; perhaps "very bold" is accurate. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 02:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to inform your decision on this edit [1]. During the spate of sock assault on the article, I placed that notice, not one of the socks. I don't mind whatever you want to do with this, but: sock placed PROD on talk page, I removed it (misplaced though it was), and added the tag to indicate that someone else had already PRODed and was challenged. I felt the benefit was that the article could not be PRODed again, and would need to go to the AfD process. I respect your decisions, and I don't mean to keep you from continuing improvements. Cheers. _signed, Willondon ( talk) 02:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Oh. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I should say that it's not that I feel in anyway personally harmed by an association with a sock. Everybody knows that's not true. I meant to propose whether or not the 'Old PROD' tag is beneficial to preventing further harm to the article. Again, I repect your decisions. _signed, Willondon ( talk) 02:42, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I didn't associate you with a sock, I saw a sock mention they put such a template on that talk page and assumed it was them who put it there. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:49, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, LilianaUwU. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Good Luck.
Message added 07:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.

-Lemonaka‎ 07:45, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I've had an ANI thread open about me for almost four weeks. It seems for the most part to be dead but for some reason is still open. Is there a reason why it is still open? Is it because consensus has not yet been reached? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 23:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Erm, if you were to look at the creator's contribs, it is obviously a testpage and not a draft. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 14:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Liliana :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Also I'm cool with playing Mario Kart again whenever you feel like it Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I've noticed you've reverted the edits of 88.230.98.112 ( talk · contribs), thanks for that. I have tried to contact them various times with no response. LibStar ( talk) 05:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

My mistake, it was this IP 88.230.111.58 ( talk · contribs) which I suspect is the same person. LibStar ( talk) 05:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Oh it is the same person, LibStar. They're called the bilateral relations troll, and are at ANI currently. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 06:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi LilianaUwU, is there an SPI page for this? They are back here. CMD ( talk) 05:52, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Found it! Best, CMD ( talk) 09:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm heading to Havre-Saint-Pierre starting tomorrow, so y'all may not see me as much for a week or so. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 16:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Currently on the road back home, approaching Forestville. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 16:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply

And I'm back home. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 04:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wanted to be the first to wish you the very best during the holidays. I hope that you and I find ourselves working together in the new year! Lightburst ( talk) 01:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I just read your comments on Tryptofish's neutral vote over at the Clovermoss RFA: I found them hurtful. This is a great project and it likely needs both of us even if we occasionally disagree. In spite of this I do really hope that we get to work together and that we learn to respect for each other. Lightburst ( talk) 02:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I don't know what causes you to think that "At least you didn't oppose, unlike a certain someone..." is a helpful comment to make while badgering an oppose at somebody's request for adminship, but please don't do stuff like this. It's just pointless flamebait and has about a zero percent chance of causing any reasonable conversation to happen. If somebody makes a comment that annoys you enough to warrant bringing it up on-wiki, I would recommend doing what I do, and writing a message to them about it on their talk page (in fact, I am doing that right now). Or, at the very least, bringing it up on the talk page for the RfA -- there's really no point to being rude to people and subtweeting them in the middle of what's supposed to be a discussion about the candidate first and foremost. jp× g 🗯️ 08:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello LilianaUwU, we need experienced volunteers.

• New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
• If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
• If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
• Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You seem to have put a POV tag on Volkssturm. It would be useful if you gave more detail on the talk page on the specific phrases, paragraphs or sections that you felt were problematic. ( Hohum ^@) 19:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Hohum: Are you kidding me? Have you even read the article? LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 19:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

With that said, the most egregious phrase (On some occasions, members of the Volkssturm showed tremendous courage and a determined will to resist, more so even than soldiers in the Wehrmacht., the very reason I put the tag) was removed. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 19:37, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

( talk page stalker) {{ POV/doc}} states The editor who adds the tag should discuss concerns on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies. In the absence of such a discussion[...]the tag may be removed by any editor. Regardless of how obvious the issue might be, you should always bring it up on the talk page. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 05:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I’m angry and tired too, don’t let it consume you. Greetings from Los Angeles.  //  Timothy ::  talk  05:41, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello LilianaUwU, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 (The Garage) 13:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1 ^{(The Garage)} 13:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Happy Wikiversary, too! InedibleHulk ( talk) 19:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC) reply

FWIW, I share your view that the NYT is massively overrated as a US paper of record, but this is likely a problem of the English-language media ecosystem that is upstream of Wikipedia, the kind that would take a mountain of peer-reviewed criticism to resolve (and even then would probably draw a lot of tendentious back and forth). If you can find it, I highly recommend My Times: A Memoir of Dissent by John L. Hess, a former journalist there that paints a less-than-shining portrait of their editorial policies. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You mentioned an LGBT Wikimedians Discord server over here. I'm curious. Could I have a link? Loki ( talk) 20:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ LokiTheLiar, it's listed as "Queer Wikimedians" on Wikipedia:Discord#Other servers. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 21:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Okay, thanks! Loki ( talk) 22:32, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Relatedly, you've been mentioned in a thread at WP:AN. (For unclear reasons, the person who posted it didn't think it was appropriate to notify you; this post is to rectify their oversight.) -- JBL ( talk) 21:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Happy First Edit Day! Hi LilianaUwU! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 23:23, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Special:Diff/1193746163. Enjoy your trout with your beans :) ‍—‍ a smart kitten_{[ meow} 18:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Been a while. I've quite literally been all over eastern Canada, from Havre-Saint-Pierre to Sorel-Tracy to Rouyn-Noranda to Lively, Ontario. I might be back by the same time next week, or I may pop in this weekend between (actual) truck loads. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 02:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Whack! You've been collectively whacked with a hover of wet trouts. Don't take this too seriously. I just want to let you know you that you did something silly.

Lightburst ( talk) 03:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

The spiteful message above notwithstanding, thank you for at least trying to deal with such an obvious problem. It's too bad that the community didn't have the stomach for actually doing anything. But the trout above will be useful for next time as evidence that Lightburst's 'can't we all just get along' schtick is insincere, so one day you may yet be vindicated. LEPRICAVARK ( talk) 00:26, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not edit the comments of others on article talk pages unless it is for removing trolling, vandalism, or unless you have the editor's permission. [2] The guideline for this is very clear. XeCyranium ( talk) 00:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ XeCyranium: redacting comments that contravene WP:BLP is allowable per WP:TPO. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 00:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Does the comment contravene BLP? By my reading it pretty clearly doesn't. XeCyranium ( talk) 00:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

It does. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 00:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ XeCyranium: yes. As I said in my edit summary, WP:BLPNAME and MOS:GENDERID apply here through WP:BDP. Benedict's former name is non-notable, and per the second paragraph of GENDERID should not be included on any page, including talk pages. We treat former names of trans and non-binary people as a privacy interest separate from and greater than their current name. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 00:51, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Is there a reason then that it doesn't include talk pages within the pages it's referring to in said second paragraph? All of these seem to be referring to article space. XeCyranium ( talk) 00:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Templates and categories aren't in mainspace. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 00:55, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Because it's a WP:BLPPRIVACY issue, and as the intro to WP:BLP states, it applies to all pages, including talk pages. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 00:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I was under the impression that BLP didn't apply to details of a deceased individual unless the details are "contentious or questionable material about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends" which from what I can tell this isn't. XeCyranium ( talk) 01:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

No, it more generally applies to people who died in contentious circumstances. Examples include suicide, homicide, or an unexpected death after an alleged assault. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 01:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

That's pretty clearly not what it says. It applies to the details of murders/suicides that could cause distress for the family/friends, it does not simply apply to anybody dead who's ever been the victim of a violent crime. XeCyranium ( talk) 01:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Please see this recently closed RfC on the current consensus interpretation of BDP. Specifically in the close The community strongly supports the position that WP:BLP should, by default, extend to deceased people for a certain amount of time after their deaths. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 01:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Okay now that's something different, shame nobody's updated any of the relevant pages, but if it does apply to non-contentious but private details regarding dead people for some yet to be determined time after their death then it seems you did the right thing indeed. Hopefully there will be an actual set timeframe in the future, but either way if that's the newest version of the policy then that seems fair to leave it as it is. It still would have been preferable if the editors had linked to that in the first place. XeCyranium ( talk) 01:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ XeCyranium: You think I'm gonna let a flagrant GENDERID violation stand? LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 00:49, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Can you specify where in GENDERID it forbids the mentioning of former names that have been reported in reliable sources on article talk pages? By my reading, you're being overzealous. XeCyranium ( talk) 00:52, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The second paragraph: it should not be included in any page (...), even in quotations, even if reliable sourcing exists. (emphasis mine). Sideswipe9th ( talk) 00:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

If a living transgender or non-binary person was not notable under a former name (a deadname), it should not be included in any page (including lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc.), even in quotations, even if reliable sourcing exists. As far as I know, talk pages fall under "etc." LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 00:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I feel like "living" is the operative word in that sentence. XeCyranium ( talk) 01:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks a lot during Arb investigation. Though nothing serious happened. Thanks for your mail. -Lemonaka‎ 09:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, LilianaUwU,

I think of you as a reliable, sensible editor so I'm bewildered why you thought it was appropriate to edit an archived AFD discussion as you did with this edit. This is just not done unless in the rare occasion where there is some objectionable content and even then it would be redacted or struck out. But we don't edit archived discussions on noticeboards or archived deletion discussions. I don't see anything here in the remarks that warrants removal. Do you have an explanation? Please do not do this again. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Liz, that's a very likely sock of one of the usual suspects, with an offensive username. I didn't use an edit summary to try to not give them attention. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 03:43, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your revert to 2024 New Jersey earthquake.

Welp - there were also BLP problems with that "popular culture" section. Maybe it can be brought back if it can be written in a neutral manner with due weight. Awesome Aasim 04:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't think it's gonna come back. LilianaUwU ^{( talk / contributions)} 04:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit summary needing redaction. Thank you. Notification on behalf of IP Lightoil ( talk) 23:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for helping with that sockpuppet! Cjhard ( talk) 05:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply