: 632
: 82
: 6
: 22
 You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the
Wikipedia Signpost today.
|
|
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the " New Section" button above. |
|---|
|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
|---|
|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
|---|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
@ Piotrus, [1], This source can help. The dogcat ( talk) 04:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
Piotrus,
[2], This source too.
The dogcat (
talk) 04:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
The dogcat I am afraid not by much. The CBR listicle does not inspire confidence because of its format, although I agree it has a sentence or so of analysis about her story. The other source is pretty bad. Bottom line, as much as I would like to see this saved, we need some academic sources or some good journalism, like what I used to save
Yoruichi_Shihōin#Analysis (see sources used). And yes, I also used CBR but compare the quality (content) of article you found on Yuuki and what I found on Yoruichi. I am not saying it is your fault, I am just saying that sadly, good sources don't seem to exist for Yuuki, so she is not as notable as Yoruichi :(
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Piotrus, Well, the AFD is saying that cbr should not be used in anything. If you want, you can check the AFD. The dogcat ( talk) 22:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Piotrus, [3], This source mentions Yuuki several times. And my question is will it help a little in the AFD? The dogcat ( talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
The dogcat I am afraid not by much. The CBR listicle does not inspire confidence because of its format, although I agree it has a sentence or so of analysis about her story. The other source is pretty bad. Bottom line, as much as I would like to see this saved, we need some academic sources or some good journalism, like what I used to save
Yoruichi_Shihōin#Analysis (see sources used). And yes, I also used CBR but compare the quality (content) of article you found on Yuuki and what I found on Yoruichi. I am not saying it is your fault, I am just saying that sadly, good sources don't seem to exist for Yuuki, so she is not as notable as Yoruichi :(
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Happy First Edit Day, Piotrus, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Piotrus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 19:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
 |
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
-
Sammi Brie (
submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11
GAs about radio and television; -
voorts (
submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (
Well he would, wouldn't he? and
Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs; -
Generalissima (
submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history; -
SounderBruce (
submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a
FA about the
2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs; -
Tamzin (
submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink
Capri-Sun and three GAs; -
Kusma (
submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist
Anna Blackburne and a GA.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges ( Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs), Epicgenius ( talk · contribs), and Frostly ( talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
: 632: 82: 6: 22
|
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the
Wikipedia Signpost today.
|
|
Please start all new discussions at the bottom of this page and include a heading. When in doubt, click the " New Section" button above. |
|---|
|
If I left you a message on your talk page, please answer it there by indenting one line and starting your response with a ping: {{Ping|Piotrus}} If you leave me a message here on my talk page, I will answer your message here by pinging you. |
|---|
|
Always sign your message (by clicking the sign button or by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~). Thanks in advance. |
|---|
|
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. | |
Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system
| Page views for this talk page over the last 90 days | ||
|---|---|---|
Detailed traffic statistics |
@ Piotrus, [1], This source can help. The dogcat ( talk) 04:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
Piotrus,
[2], This source too.
The dogcat (
talk) 04:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
The dogcat I am afraid not by much. The CBR listicle does not inspire confidence because of its format, although I agree it has a sentence or so of analysis about her story. The other source is pretty bad. Bottom line, as much as I would like to see this saved, we need some academic sources or some good journalism, like what I used to save
Yoruichi_Shihōin#Analysis (see sources used). And yes, I also used CBR but compare the quality (content) of article you found on Yuuki and what I found on Yoruichi. I am not saying it is your fault, I am just saying that sadly, good sources don't seem to exist for Yuuki, so she is not as notable as Yoruichi :(
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Piotrus, Well, the AFD is saying that cbr should not be used in anything. If you want, you can check the AFD. The dogcat ( talk) 22:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ Piotrus, [3], This source mentions Yuuki several times. And my question is will it help a little in the AFD? The dogcat ( talk) 22:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @
The dogcat I am afraid not by much. The CBR listicle does not inspire confidence because of its format, although I agree it has a sentence or so of analysis about her story. The other source is pretty bad. Bottom line, as much as I would like to see this saved, we need some academic sources or some good journalism, like what I used to save
Yoruichi_Shihōin#Analysis (see sources used). And yes, I also used CBR but compare the quality (content) of article you found on Yuuki and what I found on Yoruichi. I am not saying it is your fault, I am just saying that sadly, good sources don't seem to exist for Yuuki, so she is not as notable as Yoruichi :(
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here 07:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Happy First Edit Day, Piotrus, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Twenty Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for twenty years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
|
| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Piotrus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 19:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
-
Sammi Brie (
submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11
GAs about radio and television;
-
voorts (
submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (
Well he would, wouldn't he? and
Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
-
Generalissima (
submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
-
SounderBruce (
submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a
FA about the
2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
-
Tamzin (
submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink
Capri-Sun and three GAs;
-
Kusma (
submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist
Anna Blackburne and a GA.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges ( Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs), Epicgenius ( talk · contribs), and Frostly ( talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)