Eurocopter ( talk) is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

• Letter of resignation as Coordinator of the Military history WikiProject

Questions, requests, criticism, and any other comments are welcome! It's also a pleasure for me to help new users.

Archives

March 2007 - April 2007 May 2007 - June 2007 July 2007 - August 2007 September 2007 - October 2007 November 2007 - December 2007 January 2008 - March 2008 April 2008 - August 2008 September 2008 - December 2008 January 2009 - February 2009 March 2009 - August 2009

Hi I've just assessed your DYK on the 2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash. By my reckoning it is about 200 characters short of the threshold for passing articles. If you can pad it ever so slightly and get back to me I can pass it.  Francium12  22:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Just passed it  Francium12  11:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I've realized there may be an issue with the scoring system, and I have a solution, which I've explained here. Feedback is requested. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 23:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC) reply

On September 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page ( here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter ( talk) 23:22, 6 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Cheers for that vandalism rv on my userpage - I'm playing whack-a-mole with that editor at the moment :P EyeSerene ^talk 10:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,   Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Montenegrin Air Force at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler ( talk) 20:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC) reply

On September 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fighter Wing 71, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page ( here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Jake Wartenberg 05:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I recently began a centralized discussion for the renaming of population transfer or forced migrations relating to WWII. You have shown interest in the topic in the past so I wanted to bring the discussion at Talk:World_War_II_evacuation_and_expulsion#Requested_move to your attention. -- Labattblueboy ( talk) 13:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Coordinators/September_2009. My fault for posting in the wrong place, sorry Eurocopter. EyeSerene ^talk 09:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC) reply

• • • I just scanned the above, and at first glance thought it said "I can easily continue to out-perform any coordinator..." That may actually have been more accurate. EyeSerene ^talk 18:55, 11 September 2009 (UTC) I know this is in the wrong place; please remove before voting goes live! reply
      • Eurocopter, would you please take more care in future with creating articles? Fighter Wing 71, which you've just created, duplicates Jagdgeschwader 71 and is the only English named Luftwaffe wing. Would you please mind fixing this situation? Buckshot06( prof) 08:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Dear Eurocopter,

I recently found that the article on the leopard 2 Tank only had an infobox declaring that it was a Polish Armoured Vehicle, which seems rather silly to me, so I added the Post Cold-War Armoured Vehicle infobox so I was wondering if there was a West German Armoured Vehicle InfoBox, so I could add that is well.

-Cheers! Atomlog3 ( talk) 00:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Now that it is semi-protected, do you have a suggestion on a single, reputable, widely accessible, source we could use to update all the aircraft numbers, so they're consistent? Cheers Buckshot06( prof) 20:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC) reply

On your suggestion, I have no access to Air Forces Intelligence, and I'm not convinced of its value, to be honest. How about good old honest MilBal figures updated once a year? Buckshot06( prof) 10:01, 20 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The IISS Military Balance. It's pretty much the go-to reference in the English-speaking world; covers all countries. Buckshot06( prof) 21:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,   Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your service as coordinator on WPr Military History for the last six months. Great job, the Wikiproject has matured some more. Lots more needs to be done though.

Would you consider giving a para here on what you planned to do, what you could achieve, what gave you happiness, what irritated you and your suggestions for the road ahead to the new team?

All the best for the new elections!

AshLin ( talk) 04:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Well, besides continuing the activities undergone in the past four terms, for the next term I'm planning to organize and administrate the Henry Allingham contest (if this becomes a successful contest it would be a major achievement for me). What gives me happiness is the excellent collaboration with other exceptional users in the service of the project, as well as in mainspace. Perhaps what irritated me a bit was that it seemed, since the last elections, that few users candidated only to gain the coordinator hat, without further being active as coordinators. For the new team I would recommend a better organization with each of us having a previously assigned responsibility. Currently there are no assigned duties for each individual coordinator, so everyone just makes what they want and what they think it's necessary inside the project (this results in having a few very inactive departments). Thank you for your questions and concern. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 11:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your rsponse. I second your suggestion that coordinators are delegated responsibilities on which at least part of the time must be spent. Keep up the good work. All the best for re-election. AshLin ( talk) 13:31, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I don't object to what you did (it looks okay, even if it still is way outside the pale of WP:MOS and will give someone a headache to copyedit), but my main objection was and is to stuff like adding unretrievable citations (faux citations, if you will), to using the page like a sandbox (at some point, it was half in Romanian!, not to mention the bad, often ridiculous English - such as translating Eforie as Euphoria), and to structuring the content into the highly redundant "life" and "chronology" format. All in all, the article will have to be redone either way, if it is to move anywhere but down. And translating it from the Ro version, which is almost exactly as problematic, is simply not the way to go. I have the sources, I just need the time and energy to approach that big a subject, and I would not object to a concentrated and judicious effort from any other editor that would not reek of hodgepodge amateurism. Dahn ( talk) 12:06, 24 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Credeam că este destul dacă există referinţe la pagina despre Titu Maiorescu, eu am tradus de la wiki.ro şi nu mă pricep prea bine să citez sursa pentru articol. Mă poţi ajuta, te rog? Luiza1202 19:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

You've voted twice for Tom :) You may wish to edit it yourself   Roger Davies ^talk 08:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude for your coordination services to the Military history WikiProject, from March 2009 to September 2009, please accept this barnstar. -- TomStar81 ( Talk) 02:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 23:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi mate, personally it doesn't fuss me too much as I was the first to support it, but just a reminder that under the new rules this ACR should've remained open for 5 days, not 3 'n' a bit... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 09:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC) reply

I've incorporated many of your comments into the article Cologne War, and although it is probably not as heavily cited as you would prefer, I think it is closer to your model. Would you take another look, and see if this meets your approval? Auntieruth55 ( talk) 17:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. I'm not sure if you have seen, but I posted a comment here regarding prospective awards for the World War I contest, and I was wondering if you would like to comment? Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 05:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi mate. On another WWI Contest note, I have just noticed that there is inconsistency in how many points one is awarded on their submissions page and the main contest page. For example, on the submissions page the points for a Featured Sound or Picture is 35 points, while on the main page it is 40. This needs to be fixed up. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 01:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks mate. It seems that EyeSerene is willing and able to make the barnstars and awards also, so that should hopefully be done soon. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 11:33, 6 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. In a bit of a last-ditch effort to see if I could generate some more editors to the contest before it starts, I went and spammed all the task force talk pages with the same notice that you had BrownBot send out to all Milhist editors, so hopefully a few more prople will join! I must say, also, that you have done an excellent job in putting the whole contest together, so thanks, your efforts are much appreciated! :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 13:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi mate. Good idea on the postponement. I just integrated Sturmvogel's points for reviewing idea into the contest then, placing a section in the "Scoring" table awarding a generic 2 points for a substantial review of a GAN, ACR or FAC. I will now go and add this to each of the submissions pages, but feel free to tweak/correct as necessary! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 01:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm thinking we should actually drop the "substantial" altogether. I originally added it in there as Sturmvogel suggested it should be, basicly, a thorough/decent review, but now it is probably a little confusing. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 00:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Bryce, don't know if your last comment was partially in response to my message here... While you and I would probably agree on what "substantial" means, it will be subjective so I'm in favour of dropping it no matter what. I've also floated the idea of awarding of somewhat lower points for ACR/FAC comments, while treating GAR as automatically/objectively "substantial" and keeping as 2 points because it's generally a one-person job and involves a fair bit of effort when you consider all the steps involved. As long as "substantial" goes I'm not too fussed about differentiating points, just that I think we usually get a decent number of reviewers at ACR/FAC, but GARs we need to encourage any way we can. Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 01:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply

It was partially due to your comment, but I think in general it best not be used as, for example, who is to say if someone supports an article they have not given it a "substantial review"? I do somewhat agree with you about the points differentiation, but I do also think it is just simplier and easier to have them lumped together, and it is not devaluing one over the other. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 10:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. A few comments have poped up on the World War I Contest talk page you might like to weigh in at. Most noticably, the number of points awarded for a DYK and ITN here, and awarding points for reviewing peer reviews here. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 02:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi mate. I just noticed then that you awarded User:Redmarkviolinist points for reviewing the articles Frederick Scherger and Dennis Gorski, however neither had anything to do with the First World War. I, and I think a few others, assumed that points would only be awarded for reviewing an article if it were in the scope of the First World War. Is this not the case, then, or was this just an oversight? Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 10:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your notice! I've even left a notice on his submission talk page but completely forgot about it. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 10:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for fixing that; it just got me a little confused! Lol. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 11:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. I see you have just gone and done a Redmarkviolinist, so to speak, lol. Frederick Scherger, of which you just completed a Good article review of, is not under the scope of the World War I Task force, and is the same article Redmarkviolinist listed as reviewed for A-Class. ;-) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 00:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Heh, I figured the quick turnaround there was because you might have been looking at it for the Aviation contest (my head spins a little from all the competitions, guess I'm not the only one). However, fear not, you can always do the Hippolyte De La Rue GAN, since he definitely qualifies for WWI... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:54, 26 November 2009 (UTC) ("call me opportunistic, I don't care!") reply

God, it seems like I don't know anymore on what world I'm living on... In the past two weeks my wiki-time got so limited that I barely managed to take care of the contest. When I've noticed that familiar article on the GAN list I was convinced that it's part of our scope and didn't pay enough attention when reading it. Actually I was so tired and rushed last evening that I did not even notice that the men served in the military starting with 1921. Thanks guys for noticing me and if you see me making such stupid mistakes from now on feel free to revert me! Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Think nothing of it, mate - you've been the driving force behind this contest and your efforts both kicking it off and maintaining it are much appreciated! Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 12:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Here, here! Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 13:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC) reply

My apologies. There had been no edits made to the article since the end of September, and the review was transcluded to the article talk page. The review was open for a full week... However, if you would like to nominate the article again for GAN, after having taken care of the issues, I will re-review it right away, so that it doesn't have to sit through the waiting period again. I keep a pretty close eye on the GAN page, so I should see it when it comes up, or just drop a note on my talk page. Dana boomer ( talk) 14:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Eurocopter, I will give the idea serious thought. Thanks for the personal appeal. - Biruitorul ^Talk 15:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Have written to the Library of Congress and blogged the gratitude. [1] Cheers, Durova ³⁶⁰ 05:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC) reply

File:ConcordeCDG.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:ConcordeCDG.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:ConcordeCDG.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 21:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

File:EurocopterDauphin.jpg is now available as Commons:File:EurocopterDauphin.jpg. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 21:57, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Boeing 737 landing.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Boeing 737 landing.jpg. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 22:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

File:MiG-21 LanceR C.JPG is now available as Commons:File:MiG-21 LanceR C.JPG. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 22:11, 11 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Auntieruth55 ( talk) 16:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.roaf.ro/en/wallpaper_en.php. As a copyright violation, File:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:IAR 330 SOCAT.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MilborneOne ( talk) 17:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Socat6.jpg, which you've sourced to www.roaf.ro. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MilborneOne ( talk) 17:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

You said: "That's very simple Dc, Croitoru might be indeed a good economist but has zero managerial experience, which is vital for a PM. In the best case he would have been appropiate for the Ministry of Finance, but he was proposed for the PM position just because he's Basescu's puppet. Regarding the second part of your message, I think you misunderstood me (probably because I forgot the inverted commas when I described PD a strong promoter of liberalism and their flat tax measure as liberal). What are you suggesting now, that I'm marxist? Then, open your eyes and read above that I expressed my support for authentic liberalism. Again, let's stop here and not make Biru's talk page a place for our political debate. --Eurocopter (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2009 (UTC)"

1) Why are you calling Dahn brainwashed regarding the current political situation in Romania? You see that he has the grasp of more things than his interlocutors, don't you? In the absurd case, you could blame him of being a brainwasher, never brainwashed. Give him credit at least that his opinions and conclusions are certainly his own. 2) Are you sure you can discern the matter without having some personal involvement? It is a well-known fact that people rarely vote differently in the same family, that people with similar social situation have similar political views. You definitively must be somehow, indirectly or indirectly connected to the military, hence you or someone you know stands to loose a pension privilege or maybe even the job if the economic plans agreed with the IMF are pushed forward. Can you say for certain that your political opinions are intellectual and not based on personal experience/implications? It is a known fact that the army voted more for Geoana. 3) I have not suggested you are a Marxist. Either you misunderstood, or I expressed myself insufficiently clear. But you voted and support here in discussions a Marxist: Mircea Geoana (see his economic plans). I do "blame" you for supporting a Marxist. 4) There was no choice between 2 evils (btw, you never even said you chose between 2 evils; for all i know you might consider Geaona a good), there was a good, positive plan and a good, positive team to take Romania out of economic and political crisis, and there was a bad, negative plan and bad, negative gang to push Romania back into Iliescu's era with the added bonus of economic oligarchs in the true Russian style. It was a classical battle between good and evil, and good won. I am sorry you made a mistake this time, it happens, and I hope you would not repeat it next time. Basescu is but a small champion of the good. Constantinescu was also a positive champion in 1996, but it turned out he had no team capable of running the country. Basescu has. There is one very positive thing that came out of this 3-years long anti-Basescu campaign: good people dare more to get involved these days. 5) I compared Croitoru with Sachs and Krugman, and I do stand by that comparison. Sachs had no managerial experience when he was first given a job, and he performed it brilliantly. Krugman has been named puppet by many idiots on tv. You have to realize that some people are exceptional, and you/we have no right to treat them with the same level as everybody: you/we don't ask of a managerial experience as a job prerequest from a Sachs, you/we don't ask for a favorable media when hiring a Krugman, you/we just shut our mouths up in front of such people, you/we just thank God they agree to get involved. Think about it. It is absolutely unjust and very disrespectful what you said about Croitoru. He is not your more or less average Basescu, Constantinescu or Geoana. OK? You don't ask a renouned scientist to adhere to a certain economic philosophy you have (even a "correct" one); you change your understanding of economic thought based on what top scientists tell you. Science is above politics. Dc76\ ^talk 15:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Taken into consideration. But I'm not going to start the discussion again especially when it's started by one of Dahn's militants. I know there is always somebody keeping your side. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply

What is this supposed to mean? Are you accusing me of something? Are you calling me a Dahn's militant? Do you deny me the right to have my own opinions? Do you deny the existence of extensive but civilized content disputes I had with him? For what reason do you bring up the ArbCom case? I have never discussed you with anybody, if that's what you wonder. Or do you simply want to throw some mud at me since this seems to be the fashion these days? I would appreciate your clarifications. Dc76\ ^talk 16:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Look, probably I've overreacted and I apologise. But at the moment trust me I have many, many other better things to spend my wiki-time on, rather than discuss Romanian politics which is full of rubbish (not to say shit, which is quite gross for an encyclopedia). So yes, I respect and took into consideration your opinions, but sincerely I don't want to continue such a discussion. All the best, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 23:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC) reply

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 08:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I'd like to withdraw from the WWI taskforce contest, but still keep working in this area and keep my page there active as a record of what I do between now and the end of February (and even beyond). My page is here, but hasn't been updated since I created it. Would it be simplest to mark me as withdrawn, and let me just keep adding things to my submissions page as I do them? i.e. Keep contributing to the content drive, but withdraw from the competitive aspects of it - kind of like a non-competing participant - is that possible? Carcharoth ( talk) 02:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Since you created yourself your submission page I hadn't have it watchlisted until now and was unaware of your submissions. I'm terribly sorry and apologise if this changed somehow your contest performance. As I looked over your submission page, you seem to be at the moment just 1 point behind the last competitor which qualifies for the second round (and he hasn't been very active recently). So if you want to continue, go ahead, create an article and catch him up (you still have more than three days to do this). I will award you the points for your submissions first thing after arriving home from my holiday. Thanks and best regards, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 16:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Well, I'm happy to stay in the contest, but I suppose it does rather depends on how I end up doing after round one. :-) I've done a bit more now and will be doing some more over the next few hours. As I said, I'll be carrying on regardless of what happens in the contest, but it will be interesting to see what the results of round one are. I'll try not to shove things through at the last minute... Carcharoth ( talk) 22:34, 29 December 2009 (UTC) I did slip two more in at the last minute, but that's it now from me. I'm excited to see the work being done on other memorial articles ( Beaumont-Hamel Memorial is GA and Vimy Memorial is A-class). Am off to see if anyone wants to talk about this on the memorials taskforce page). Thanks for all your work on this contest! Carcharoth ( talk) 00:01, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply

• James Whiteside McCay has been promoted to A-class. Shouldn't that score? Hawkeye7 ( talk) 00:11, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes, thank you for noticing me! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 00:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply

• Think my create/improve score is 125, not 119, with flow-on to total... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 00:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your notice as well and please apologise my mistakes. I have to finish everything during this night as tommorow morning i'm leaving again on holiday till saturday. Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 00:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC) reply

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. I just have a quick query regarding the points for Walter Peeler going from A to FA for the World War I Contest. You awarded the article 18 points for this elevation in status, yet according to the point scoring table this is worth 25 points, so I was just wondering why the discrepency? Anyway, I hope you had a good holliday and a happy New Year. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 12:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

That's what I thought your rational would be. ;-) However, I figured that when a new round started everything, basically, started afresh. So, from my understanding, I would have been credited with raising Walter Peeler from Stub to A during the first round and been awarded 27 points, but in the new round this would be, basically, irrelevant and I would have been credited with raising the article from A to FA, and thus awarded 25 points, much similar to how it works in the monthly contest. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 12:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

No, I can understand this system and as long as it is consistent with everyone than I have no specific complaints about it. I do, however, think this may be a little more difficult to track in some cases in comparision to the other. Thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 12:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm confident in your abilities, so it should be all fine. ;-) I did notice a slight mistake, however ... you awarded me 7 points for a DYK on the scoreboard! Lol. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 14:48, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Well, sorry for the "inconvenience". :)) -- Eurocopter ( talk) 15:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Lol! Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 01:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Yep, I think I should be able to have a crack at it. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 00:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey Eurocopter. I just thought I would let you know that I went to review the above today, only to find that someone else had started a review of the article a few days ago, just they didn't note they were reviewing the article on the GAN page. Oh, well. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 08:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC) reply

As of today, I have returned to Wikipedia to contribute to what I see is now a major Cold War history "project." I last participated in the Cold War history topic in 2006, and just today updated my user page.

I've had to take the time out in order to write and publish a trilogy of relevant books: Nuclear Insights: The Cold War Legacy. available on Amazon.com, all derived from a four-handed collaboration for Nuclear Shadowboxing: Contemporary Threats from Cold War Weaponry.

With that done, I have some time to contribute, and see considerable progress and organization. Your activities as a project coordinator seem most relevant, so I'd like to get your advice on what and how to go about it.

According to my records, my editing was limited to the topics "Cold War" and "Nuclear Weapons."

From a brief review, I see now that I could also contribute to "Nuclear Proliferation," which apparently needs help. In addition, the "Legacy" subtitle under "Cold War" would fit well with the focus of my latest books.

It is also evident that there there is a steep learning curve for conformity with format.

--Alex DeVolpi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterfox1 ( talk • contribs) 19:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC) reply

A few quick questions:

• I have a DYK approved and waiting in the queue to go on the Main Page tomorrow. The article was written on 30 December and nominated before the end of the last round (sorry, I forgot the last round ended before 30 December) but not approved until a few days ago. I was waiting for it to go up before adding it to my submissions page (I hadn't realised it took so long for DYK now, but the process does look most efficient). I got the article creation points this round, and I assume the DYK is this round as well. What happens with future DYKs nominated towards the end of this round?
  • In this case the DYK counts for the current round. If you nominate a DYK during the current round and seems that it will be promoted during the next round you decide whether the points awarded will count for the current or the respective next round (but you have to decide of course before the end of the ending round). -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• In the first round, you assessed one of the articles I created as B-class and added the checklist, but it doesn't seem to be displaying properly. See here.
  • Fixed. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• About the same article, if I try and get that to the standards for a featured list, would there be a level-up number of points, or a straight 40 points, and would the promotion have to be before the end of this round (rather than just the nomination being in this round)?
  • Besides the points awarded for the article improvement, you'll get another 40 points for promoting a FL. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• There is a B-Class checklist entry on my submissions page that seems to be getting missed with each update. I intend to add more B-list checklist entries there, and it is "only" 0.1 at the moment, so not urgent, but was wondering if that was just being missed, or there was a problem there?
  • I'm not going to edit the section each time you submit one or two assessments or B-class checklists for just 0.1 or 0.2 points. I'll wait for more to be submitted and if you don't submit anymore be sure you'll get the points at the end of the round. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• I'm still working on Stone of Remembrance, to make it more start than stub. When I've finished, shall I submit it to that place you or someone mentioned earlier for re-assessment, or is that only for B-class or higher assessments? If I think a stub can be bumped up to start, is it easier just to ask you, and shall I add a note in future if I add something to the submissions page that I am still working on?
  • Feel free to simply announce me and I'll assess it.
• Thanks! Carcharoth ( talk) 04:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Any questions are welcome! -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply
    • Thanks for the answers. I do have one quick question, about scope again. I recently created a very small stub at For Services Rendered. As I'm not sure whether that is in scope, I didn't submit it. However, my questions about scope aren't getting much response. See here and here. Are there better places to ask these questions, or should I be more specific? I will ask at the WWI task force talk page section explicitly about For Services Rendered, but was hoping for a response to the general question as well. My feeling is that the articles are more about culture and cultural history, than about military history, but others may think there should be some room in the scope to include these. Certainly the First World War poets and their poetry, I would have thought, but then where do you draw the line? Carcharoth ( talk) 03:54, 9 January 2010 (UTC) reply
• Sorry for cluttering my submissions page with notes - thanks for moving them to the talk page! Carcharoth ( talk) 12:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply
  • No problem. Regarding scope questions mentioned above, the best place for adressing them is the main project talk page. Although I could say my opinions if certain articles are within our scope or not, I don't believe they should be decisive. Raise a thread on the project talk page and I would probably comment there. Cheers -- Eurocopter ( talk) 13:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply
    • I think it might depend on whether people active in the project feel able to assess the articles... :-) I was a bit ambitious with The Muse in Arms. That is definitely more literary than military. But I enjoyed doing that, so I don't really mind what the verdict is. I have started a talk page thread (I linked it above), but as I said, no-one has replied there yet. I'll go and add this one there. Carcharoth ( talk) 15:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Eurocopter, I'd like to semi-protect this page, given the number of times I keep having to revert vandalism, removal of references, etc etc, mostly from anon IPs - take a look at the edit history. But just wanted to run it past a coordinator first. What do you think? Best wishes for the New Year, Buckshot06 (talk) 07:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Happy New Year! Of course, go ahead and semi-protect it, especially as it is a quite delicate topic. We should track such articles more rigorously as disruption in equipment and current inventory numbers is common (besides Iran, see Georgia, Syria, etc). -- Eurocopter ( talk) 10:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC) reply

I am not questioning your closure since it looks good, but why did you close Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Assessment/Petlyakov Pe-8 but not do any of the other promotion steps? We are now cross-listing with Aviation so it ought to be fine for MILHIST coords to close their reviews that are cross-listed to us. - MBK ₀₀₄ 23:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I had to leave unexpectedly yesterday evening just when I was starting to close the ACR. Took care of it now. Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 13:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC) reply

I've now completed the merger of the Romanian military history task force into the Balkan military history task force. As you were listed as a coordinator of the Romanian task force, I've transferred your coordinatorship over; you may wish to update your watchlist accordingly. All the best, EyeSerene ^talk 12:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Sorry that came as a surprise, Eurocopter. I hope you don't mind me correcting you though - the discussion (now archived here) wasn't on the coords talk page. It was on the main milhist talk page for three months (from October 2009 until a few days ago) and was announced in the milhist newsletter. I closed it down about week ago for lack of further activity. However, if you think the merger is wrong, maybe that should be discussed further at WT:MILHIST? EyeSerene ^talk 12:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Yes, Kirill made the same point you've made, that Romania isn't in the Balkans. I assume everyone else who commented felt that Romania comes under the wider definition of "Balkans", even if it's not in the actual geographical Balkan peninsular. Whether that's correct or not I don't know, but it was the consensus view. I think Tom might be looking at further task force reorganisation fairly soon though, so if you think the Balkan task force could now do with a more accurate name that might be a good time to mention it (and if you can't access the discussion, I'll try to remember to mention it on your behalf). EyeSerene ^talk 21:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter. The GAN reviewer of Horses in World War I contacted me recently asking if I was still interesed in reviewing the article as they are preoccupied with issues in their RL. However, I am also a little busy now, trying to organise everything for my first year at university, so don't think I could properly review the article, and was wondering if you would be interested in doing so yourself? Cheers, Abraham, B.S. ( talk) 23:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter! Would the above be anything that you would have an interest in? If not, I'm going to ping some other people who may be interested in reviewing, but wanted to give you first dibs. Either way is good, I'd just like to get the review under way again! Thanks in advance, Dana boomer ( talk) 23:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter! This note is to inform you that your Aviation Contest submissions page has been archived from the previous round! You are now free to add submissions for this round! Note: This next round will run from January through February, so feel free to update your submission page with work from both months! Thanks, and happy editing! (Note: I will not be watching this space. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Contest discussion page. - SidewinderX ( talk) 13:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Not sure how much time you have to look at these two articles I stumbled across:

• The monument aux morts of the Western Somme
• The monument aux morts of the Eastern Somme

I would have normally assessed them, but I think they need a closer look than that (they might have been copied from somewhere else). If you would prefer a note about this to be put on the task force talk page, I'll do that. Carcharoth ( talk) 09:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC) reply

TomStar81 ( Talk) 06:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 22:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hiya. I just read the latest MilHist newsletter, and was half-expecting to see the results of phase two of the WWI contest listed there (given that the results of phase 1 appeared in the December 2009 issue). Is the plan to have the results of phase 2 listed in the March issue, alongside the results of phase 3 (i.e. the overall results)? Speaking of which, I see I need to get a move on with more submissions for phase 3! :-) Carcharoth ( talk) 05:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Aww. Looks like the contest is finished now! :-( I failed to achieve my personal aim, which was to bring a large number of the articles I started or assessed to B-class (though I did get a few up there), but I've really enjoyed the contest and am going to continue working on a range of WWI articles to get them to B-class (at least). I also noticed the glittery objects in your sandbox, and I was wondering if as well as those you were going to make a list of articles that reached a certain class-level during the contest, or were created during the contest, as part of a summary of the contest? If you weren't planning to make such a list or table, would it be OK if I did something along those lines? Carcharoth ( talk) 13:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC) Oh, and thanks for the reply to the above note, and thanks for the work in running the contest! reply

Hi there Eurocopter! I was directed to the World War I Task Force from WP:FEEDBACK pertaining about User:Buggie111/Battle of the Argesul. Since you identify yourself from Romania, I'd like some suggestions on building the article. I have one ref which describes it a bit more in detail, but I still have not added info from it. So once gain, TIA.

Buggie111 ( talk) 20:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply

On a seperate note, I'm thinking about nominating your for adminship, though I have not plowed through your contribs. Also, I don't know if it's a bit wierd to no,minate an editor who has more experience than you.

Toodaloo,

Buggie111 ( talk) 20:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Check your sandbox - I've left a rough design there that you should be able to modify (the colours and fonts may need work!) Hope this helps. If you'd rather have a different layout, let me know. EyeSerene ^talk 21:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey,

I was considering running for Coordinator for the Military History WikiProject, but I am not sure. I was very busy in the "real world" during the last elections and did not think I was prepared to devote the time to the WikiProject that it truly deserves. I'm back now and I have started getting involved again. I've always respected your opinion, especially after we served together as coordinators in Tranche VII. I would really appreciate your advice on this. Thanks and Have a Great day! Lord Oliver ^{The Olive Branch} 22:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much for your advice! I think I have decided to wait for the next election to run (if I run at all). I feel like I still need to get more involved within the WP. So that if I run I will feel certain that my time and talents can best be used to help the best WP on Wikipedia. Thanks SO much and Have A Great Day! :) Lord Oliver ^{The Olive Branch} 18:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Congratulations Eurocopter, and thank you for your support at the election, very much appreciated. See you around the Milhist pages! Ranger Steve ( talk) 21:00, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude of your service as a coordinator for the Military history Project from September 2009 to March 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. TomStar81 ( Talk) 00:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I hope you don't mind, but I did some more stats on the WWI contest. I posted here, then wrote this page and then posted this. It gives a slightly different picture to the stats you presented (in particular, the figure of 65 existing articles improved when compared with the figure of 238 article improvement level ups - both figures are right, they are just saying different things by measuring in different ways). I do think the extra detail is useful - what do you think? Carcharoth ( talk) 01:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your support MisterBee1966 ( talk) 14:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Um, we were going to re-word the citation to include his term as coordinator, weren't we??? - MBK ₀₀₄ 19:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I'll take care of it - MBK ₀₀₄ 20:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. I look forward to working with you during the next six months. – Joe N 14:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello mate. I see you are "are actively involved" with the Romanian Land Forces article. I couldn't help notice there is no record of the army's role in the revolution. I'd be interested to learn more about this and maybe add to the article, your thoughts? Ryan4314 ( talk) 01:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC) reply

First of all, excuse me for my late response, I was quite inactive on wiki during the recent period. The most important issue here on wiki regarding Romanian military history is the lack of reliable English sources and low level of interest besides Western historiography. The best thing I could do is to start adding information based on press articles - but that wouldn't be very professional for an encyclopedia. Briefly, starting with the evening of the 21st December the army switched sides and joined the protesters; afterwards, until 22nd evening there where intense fightings between protesters and army on one side and Securitate together with other loyalist forces on the other side. What is most important is that out of 1.150 victims of the revolution, about 940 died in confrontations between army and securitate after Ceausescu was overthrown and the new regime seized power. All the best -- Eurocopter ( talk) 19:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, since I first asked this question I have done some research on the Armata during the revolution. I thoroughly recommend the book "The Romanian Revolution of December 1989" by Peter Siani-Davies, a heavily cited book by an englishman. I'd like to write a very neutral, general paragraph and hoped you could give me some feedback on it please. Ryan4314 ( talk) 21:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Of course, I'd be happy to do that. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC) reply

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:20, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Be my pleasure - I'll do it tomorrow. EyeSerene ^talk 21:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

OK, done. I hope I haven't changed the meaning of anything or put words into your mouth - if so, please accept my apologies and feel free to rv as necessary. Hopefully au revoir and not adieu, EyeSerene ^talk 09:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

That's great! I'm honoured to be asked to help out :) Best, EyeSerene ^talk 13:41, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for all the great work done in your three-year period as coordinator. Hope you will continue normal editing on Wikipedia. AshLin ( talk) 16:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm surprised no one else has come here about it, but that was a lovely read full of extremely sound advice. I'm certain that I will be linking an editor to it at some point in the future. Thanks for all the fish (and coordinating, and editing, and everything else...), — Ed  (talk • majestic titan) 03:26, 9 June 2010 (UTC) reply

		The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves
		By the order of the coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of his long and distinguished service as a Coordinator of this project from August 2007 to May 2010; coordination of the Henry Allingham World War I Contest; his exceptional behind the scenes work in the ongoing running of the A-Class Review process; and in recognition of his contributions which include three Featured Articles and six A-Class articles. - MBK 004 23:13, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:BelarusSu-25K.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Alex Spade ( talk) 14:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members June's contest results plus the latest awards to our members	Editorial LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CA-95.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:RusSu-25.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss ( talk) 08:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced; Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections	Articles Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content
Members July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy	Editorial Opportunities for new military history articles
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 21:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews during the period July-December 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. TomStar81 ( Talk) 01:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{ WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, particularly your diligence in closing A-Class and Peer Reviews, I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar -- Cheers, Ian Rose ( talk) 02:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants	Editorial In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 23:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,   Roger Davies ^talk 21:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC) reply

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude of your service as coordinator for the Military history Project from March 2010 to September 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. — TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:18, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Project news The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals	Articles A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles
Members Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)	Editorial In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Could you please add at least one reference? Tx, Nergaal ( talk) 07:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Done! Anyway I couldn't find any source implying exactly that Constanta bypass and extension to the Bulgarian border will be designated A4. However, according to Romanian legislation the next commissioned motorway should be designated A4 (as A3 was the last one) and Constanta bypass stretch (22km) is the closest new motorway to be completed (late 2011). The previously named A4 motorway, Targu Mures - Iasi currently undergoes feasebility studies and there aren't much chances that construction works would start before 2015. Cheers, -- Eurocopter ( talk) 18:51, 3 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I googled around for a while and it does not seem to be a separate motorway. There have been plans since the beginning to have a sector past Constanta, and now it seems they just got the guarantee to get EU funding for this segment. Not even CNADR implies anything about a new A4. I believe it would be safer to merge the stub for now into the A2 one. Nergaal ( talk) 19:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply

That would be wrong, because A2 will end in Constanta bypass which will be a separate motorway. The A2-A4 interchange is planned at the 13th kilometer of the bypass. Check on google maps ( http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=44.130971,28.515015&spn=0.720526,1.234589&z=10). You can consult this forum for additional information - http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1081947. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:ROMP.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Su25TM.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 16:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:RO MP.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:01, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:RO paratroopers.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:ROSpecialOps.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:LAROMs.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hawk missiles.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Romanian special forces.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:IonAntonescu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot ( talk) 20:43, 18 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 15:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 21:40, 17 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

-- Codrin.B ( talk) 05:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 01:42, 29 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:22, 17 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 22:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot ( talk) 22:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:71st AB Control Tower.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:71st AB Control Tower (front).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:08, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the award and the invitation, but my main focus at the moment is the Romanian wikipedia. Maybe in the future...-- Mircea87 ( talk) 09:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot ( talk) 21:58, 14 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Thanks for uploading File:Su-25KM.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 16:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Su-25SM.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 16:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Su-25UB2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 16:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:CzechSu-25Ks.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{ OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 16:19, 3 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Eurocopter! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:

1. What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
2. Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
3. What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
4. Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil#MILHIST Military Aviation questionnaire and filling it out.

; ~~~
#My strengths
#Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
#:
#:
#:
#:
#Sources which I have
#:
#:
#Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
#:

Thank you for your assistance. Regards -- Sp33dyphil © • © 09:22, 25 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the " Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D ( talk) and Ed  ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject. reply

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

-- Codrin.B ( talk) 04:08, 21 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:307 bat..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound ( talk) 23:07, 6 April 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Romanian Air Force IAR-330 SOCAT crash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 18:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vanatori de Munte.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators ( about the project • what coordinators do) 09:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

What was this Joint Task Force Headquarters 2 of the Romanian Armed Forces? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 09:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Sincerelly no idea. In what period did you find it? Do you have a translation? -- Eurocopter ( talk) 09:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Was added in this edit to the Romanian Land Forces article. Later seemingly became the 2nd Division. Can you do a little searching on the ro-internet? Buckshot06 (talk) 05:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Probably it was a Joint task force headquarters within the Ministry of Defense, comprising heads of the air force, navy and land forces. -- Eurocopter ( talk) 12:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Can you find anything in Romanian on the internet about it? It seems unlikely to have been a triservice committee, since it later became the 2nd Infantry Division. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

The new policy of airline destinations pages is States+City+Airport+Notes+Refs. You can see Ethiopian Airlines destinations as example. -- Wind of freedom ( talk) 23:57, 2 March 2013 (UTC) reply

British Airways and Cathay Pacific destinations pages have the old configuration table. The new is in Ethiopian page. -- Wind of freedom ( talk) 02:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes, you can see here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airlines#Terminated_template_in_use_in_layout_.28Airlines.29 -- Wind of freedom ( talk) 14:32, 3 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your message regarding the motorway towards Lugoj. However, using that designation in the articles requires reliable, published sources that support it, according to the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that it is the most correct to wait until it is officially announced. Thank you and best regards to you as well, BaboneCar ( talk) 15:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC) reply

According to the guidelines, Internet forum postings are not accepted as reliable sources. BaboneCar ( talk) 16:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Eremia Grigorescu.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 21:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Highways in Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deva ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iași International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Airport|London-Heathrow]] [ends 27 October 2013], [[London Luton Airport|London-Luton]]<nowiki> (begins 28 October 2013, Rome-Fiumicino, Turin</nowiki>

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iași International Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Airport|London-Heathrow]] [ends 27 October 2013], [[London Luton Airport|London-Luton]]<nowiki> (begins 28 October 2013, Rome-Fiumicino, Turin</nowiki>

Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill  ^[talk] 18:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bz86.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Your upload of File:A-380.4,1.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:A-18SuperHornet.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:15, 5 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:A-380.5.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:16, 5 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:A-380.1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:A-380.2,1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:A-380.3,1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 11:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC) reply

• Another one of your uploads, File:Aruban Coast Guard.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 12:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Eurocopter: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, BusterD ( talk) 06:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Template:RAF Tornado Squadrons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MilborneOne ( talk) 10:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Hi, Eurocopter. I've been going through some of the top contributors to the Military history WikiProject, and I noticed your contribution dropped off significantly around 2010. I looked at your talk page, and, while your link to the resignation letter seems to have been archived, I did find the editorial in the Bugle. You initially cited real life problems, but it was hard not to notice the sentence "Contributing to Wikipedia is something most of us do as a hobby; time spent in useless conflicts is precious editing time wasted." in boldface. I'm trying to understand why contributors like you have significantly dropped off in your edits. If you would take the time to add your experience to my talk page, I would really appreciate it. You can also email me at wllm@wllm.com, if you'd like to private msg. No matter what, I wish you happy trails. ,Wil ( talk) 04:01, 8 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

You reverted all of my edits in the article War in Donbass without a proper reason. You stated you were reverting removal of sources, but you reverted much more than that. These were my edits:
1 - I changed the term insurgent to separatist because that's the common name by which they are called.
2 - The figure of 560–860 killed militants was based on older and out-of-date sources (separatist claims) which I replaced with one newer more up-to-date source (also separatist) citing 800 dead.
3 - Figure of 7,401 killed and wounded soldiers can be cited with just one proper source, there is no need for three sources for the same thing, so I removed two of them (one was even a blog I think; not allowed per WP policy).
4 - I shortened the text Some 20,000 Internal Affairs Ministry defections to 20,000 policemen deserted/defected, per the source.
Furthermore, you removed the link for the 18 reported dead soldiers from 5 August. I don't see anything wrong with these edits. If you do, please discuss it with me before reverting again. Thank you! EkoGraf ( talk) 09:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed  ^{[talk]  [majestic titan]} 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC) reply

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Please respond at Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/sandbox#Pinging next round; thanks! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed  ^{[talk]  [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC) reply

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 21:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Hello. I have reverted your edits on Cluj International Airport because they did not appear constructive to me. There was a reliable source indicating the new information, so it has been reverted back to its original version. Also, please use the edit summary explaining your reverts in the future. Thank you. 2607:FB90:42E:F626:0:4C:32CA:FD01 ( talk) 16:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Oh my bad, whoops. ;-) Thanks for correcting me... 2607:FB90:42E:F626:0:4C:32CA:FD01 ( talk) 20:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Jefferson Davis; Hawkeye7 on Australia's war in Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses British World War I conscription Timeline: This month in World War I

	Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on nuclear weapons in Britain and Nick-D on Australia's war in the Pacific Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Kamurun Campaign of 1914–16 Timeline: This month in World War I

	Your 9th Wiki-Birthday
	Congratulations on nine years of editing. I hope we'll see you around next year to join the Ten Year Society. Chris Troutman ( talk) 13:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 discusses a Panzer general and a "mercenary mum" Op-ed: TomStar81 on the terrible battles of 1916 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies, Nick-D on the German Army Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1916 Easter Rising Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian spies (part two) Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of Jutland Timeline: Events of World War I

Hi there. Apologies for the impersonal nature of this post. I am sending this short note to a number of people who were involved (some still are) with World War I topics, letting them know about a WWI projects directory that I've started (in my userspace for now). Would you be able to look and see if there is anything you might be able to add or advice on what is most useful? If you want any follow ups, please put your name on the talk page. Many thanks. Carcharoth ( talk) 22:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Imperial Force Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at disease control and defence satellites Op-ed: TomStar81 on the rise of air power Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on Nazi terror and covert warfare Op-ed: Hawkeye7 looks at Australians on the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on the evolution of the tank Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two new books on the US military Interview: A chat with our new project coordinators Review essay: Nick-D discusses recent works on the British and Australian Armies in World War I Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of the Battle of the Somme Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at America's nuclear capability at the start of the Cold War Review essay: Hawkeye7 on the Manhatten Project suite of articles Op-ed: TomStar81 discusses leadership changes in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 21:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC) reply

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three recent works Op-ed: TomStar81 on a curious episode of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) & MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on two facets of US military power Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Russian Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at air power and nuclear weaponry Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on Australia's part in the advance on the Hindenburg Line Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Strategic Air Command doctrine Op-ed: Tomstar81 looks at a little-known aspect of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Battle of Kokoda and US defence acquisition in the 1960s Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at planning for the unthinkable Op-ed: TomStar81 on Russia's Provisional Government in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

This is to let you know that the Falaise Pocket article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 August 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 12, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 10:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Precious

-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC) reply

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1707 of Precious, a prize of QAI! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Thank you today for Operation Cobra! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of Messines and recent Australian Army leadership; Nick-D on South African armour Op-ed: Nick-D talks photography Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at two recent releases Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on ANZACs in the Third Ypres Offensive Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert ( talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at Australian involvement on the Western Front in 1918 and in post-war New Guinea Op-ed: TomStar81 on the October Revolution Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on late 1917 naval warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Halifax Explosion of 1917 Timeline: This month in World War I

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC) reply

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 15:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at tropical medicine and Operation Market Garden Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on US Army doctrine in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Napoleonic Wars and Hawkeye7 on World War II Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on generalship in 1918 Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at a work by Daniel Ellsberg Op-ed: TomStar81 on the 1918 flu pandemic Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
• updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:54, 27 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the bombing of Darwin; recent books by female military historians Review essay: K.e.coffman on Wikipedia's representations of the Nazi German military Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Red Baron Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at coalitions and logistics in World War II, and Nick-D at Australia's frontier wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on a supergun of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: This month's external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the murder of the Romanovs Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a classic US official history Op-ed: TomStar81 on belated declarations of war in 1916–18 Timeline: This month in World War I

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Indy Beetle and Nick-D on the Katangese Gendarmes and India during World War II Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at two important treaties of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC) reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused. reply

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the close of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Bz86a.gif

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:20, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Bz71.gif

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:22, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BRIGADA 1AA.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:23, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 96.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:25, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 85.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 84.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 83.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:37, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 82.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:39, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 288.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 285.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:BATALION 191.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:1st CIMIC Battalion (Romania) insignia.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 14:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 looks at the Sydney Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Indy beetle looks at military newspapers in East Africa

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at Albert Speer Op-ed: Factotem on common problems affecting infoboxes Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Japanese battleship Mikasa

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Navy aviation safety and Australian war crimes trials

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67, Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at three books focussing on the World Wars Op-ed: Indy Beetle on the fall of Idi Amin

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia's leadership and medical services in World War II and Peacemaker67 on Israel's targeted assassinations Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the fate of the German fleet at Scapa Flow

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Dambusters, and Hawkeye7 at Allied code breakers and Australia in New Guinea and Vietnam Op-ed: TomStar81 on the treaty that ended World War I

The file File:Alpini log.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Div tridentina.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 21 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Alpini art.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gua mon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Haweye7, Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on recent books covering the world wars

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Peacemaker67 look at Italian, German and Australian forces in World War II

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC) reply

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the legacy of World War II

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi... Could you please so kind to participate in request for comment on Template talk:Infobox military unit. Looking forward to your input. Thanks.( Ckfasdf ( talk) 09:33, 8 October 2019 (UTC)) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at three works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on writing a military biography

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Willbb234 on Allied pilots, Hawkeye7 on the defence of Australia and logistics in Indochina, Nick-D on Australian commandos Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports back on a high-profile history symposium

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at works on aspects of the Second World War and Cold War

Thanks for uploading File:Serbanescu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Jim Mattis

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at a failed German counterattack in the Battle of Normandy

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the logistics behind the Crusades and the USAF's early Cold War nuclear deterrant

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D and Hawkeye7 look at fortifications, the German Army, and post-Cold War conflict

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the naval siege of Japan in 1945

This is to let you know that the Operation Cobra article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 25, 2020. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 25, 2020, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hadrian's Wall and Hawkeye7 on the British military Op-ed: Nick-D on diversity and military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Nick-D on 1945

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review Essay: Nick-D on the Historical Aircraft Restoration Society

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Franklin Roosevelt in World War II and Hog Farm on the Battle of Chancellorsville

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D & Hawkeye7 look at two aspects of 20th Century warfare Op-ed: TomStar81 on the Unknown Soldiers

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the war in Ukraine

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history " Military Historian of the Year" and " Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks Australian artillery in World War I Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on no-win scenarios

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Works on the Gallipoli Campaign, Battle of Perryville and US 1st Infantry Division

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on female computers, Nick-D on the Israeli Defence Forces

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Dorin Dănilă has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick- D and Hawkeye7 look at intelligence gathering, doctrine and strategy

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on RAAF aircraft, Hawkeye7 on mission command and nuclear secrecy

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Peacemaker67 and Nick-D on World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Commonwealth armies and an Australian spy, Nick-D on the American Revolutionary War and RAAF mine laying Op-ed: RobDuch on United States coastal defenses

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australia and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan Op-ed: Nick-D on writing about military procurement

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on British conscription and German warship raiders

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Canadian junior officers in World War II

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 ( talk) 17:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Franklin–Nashville campaign Review essay: Military History Wikiproject Coordinators' reading list

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas ( discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction ( discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 ( discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 ( discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors ( ?) ω = 250,726 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper ( discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A ( discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War ( discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten ( discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation ( discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack ( discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States ( discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways ( discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages ( discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) ( discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz ( discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll ( discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian Army in Somalia Review essay: Hog Farm on American Civil War sites in the South and Midwest

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D on World War II in Europe

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on Hitler as a military leader

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on military logistics and rebuilding Nagasaki

The article RC Bârlad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is currently unsourced. Would incubate in draft space, but a draft already exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 17:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Liga Națională de Rugby season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stadionul Municipal and Stadionul Tineretului. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. ( t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on a World War II summit and the American space program

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I ( Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

Hello, Eurocopter. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrei Pricopie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 06:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Hello, Eurocopter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Andrei Pricopie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Eurocopter. I just want to thank you for your work as well as maintaining the Wikipedia page for the Liga Națională de Rugby. However, I have a question. What is the source of information regarding attendances for games?

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Liga Națională de Rugby season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadionul Steaua.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Liga Națională de Rugby season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadionul Steaua.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

Romanian Land Forces has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 04:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

Hi, I'm currently reformatting the tables in List of aircraft of World War II to improve their readability. One thing, I'm doing is separating the aircraft column from the manufacturer. Looking at other aircraft list pages, I wanted to ask if this format would be acceptable under the Aviation WikiProject standards for aircraft tables? -Thank You, WRD2030 ( talk) 03:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

Precious

Six years!

-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:13, 12 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 ( talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

Michael the Brave has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 01:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian