Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
The June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort to reduce the backlog of Good Article nominations. Please review articles according to the GA criteria and the Manual of Style; we also recommend the essays What the Good article criteria are not and Reviewing good articles. The co-ordinators for this drive are Buidhe, Hog Farm, Trainsandotherthings, Harrias, Kavyansh.Singh, and Shushugah. The drive began on 1 June 2022 at 00:00:00 (UTC) and ended on 30 June 2022 at 23:59:59 (UTC).
The ultimate goal of this backlog elimination drive is to promote high-quality reviewing and cut the number of outstanding GANs and in particular those which have been in the queue 90 days or more. Awards will be given out to those individuals who do the most work in helping reduce the size of the backlog.
Numbers are reported as described here.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Date | Outstanding nominations |
Unreviewed nominations |
Change since previous day [N 1] |
Change since beginning [N 1] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 June 2022 | 602 | 520 | — | — |
2 June 2022 | 602 | 487 | 33 (6.3%) | 33 (6.3%) |
3 June 2022 | 588 | 456 | 31 (6.4%) | 64 (12.3%) |
4 June 2022 | 583 | 446 | 10 (2.2%) | 74 (14.2%) |
5 June 2022 | 584 | 433 | 13 (2.9%) | 87 (16.7%) |
6 June 2022 | 563 | 412 | 21 (4.8%) | 108 (20.8%) |
7 June 2022 | 547 | 398 | 14 (3.4%) | 122 (23.5%) |
8 June 2022 | 536 | 388 | 10 (2.5%) | 132 (25.4%) |
9 June 2022 | 533 | 384 | 4 (1%) | 136 (26.2%) |
10 June 2022 | 533 | 385 | 1 (0.3%) | 135 (26%) |
11 June 2022 | 529 | 381 | 4 (1%) | 139 (26.7%) |
12 June 2022 | 528 | 379 | 2 (0.5%) | 141 (27.1%) |
13 June 2022 | 527 | 382 | 3 (0.8%) | 138 (26.5%) |
14 June 2022 | 523 | 379 | 3 (0.8%) | 141 (27.1%) |
15 June 2022 | 519 | 378 | 1 (0.3%) | 142 (27.3%) |
16 June 2022 | 519 | 374 | 4 (1.1%) | 146 (28.1%) |
17 June 2022 | 513 | 371 | 3 (0.8%) | 149 (28.7%) |
18 June 2022 | 508 | 372 | 1 (0.3%) | 148 (28.5%) |
19 June 2022 | 505 | 368 | 4 (1.1%) | 152 (29.2%) |
20 June 2022 | 506 | 373 | 5 (1.4%) | 147 (28.3%) |
21 June 2022 | 504 | 374 | 1 (0.3%) | 146 (28.1%) |
22 June 2022 | 504 | 376 | 2 (0.5%) | 144 (27.7%) |
23 June 2022 | 501 | 373 | 3 (0.8%) | 147 (28.3%) |
24 June 2022 | 493 | 364 | 9 (2.4%) | 156 (30%) |
25 June 2022 | 494 | 366 | 2 (0.5%) | 154 (29.6%) |
26 June 2022 | 490 | 361 | 5 (1.4%) | 159 (30.6%) |
27 June 2022 | 485 | 357 | 4 (1.1%) | 163 (31.3%) |
28 June 2022 | 485 | 363 | 6 (1.7%) | 157 (30.2%) |
29 June 2022 | 481 | 365 | 2 (0.6%) | 155 (29.8%) |
30 June 2022 | 477 | 364 | 1 (0.3%) | 156 (30%) |
1 July 2022 | 473 | 366 | 2 (0.5%) | 154 (29.6%) |
To receive an award, please include your name and the number of reviews you have completed as part of this drive. Awards will be given by the co-ordinators after this drive ends.
This is the scheme for the awards:
At least 3 points: The Invisible Barnstar
At least 7 points: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
At least 15 points: The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
At least 20 points: The Reviewer Barnstar
At least 30 points: The Multiple Good Article Reviewer Barnstar
At least 40 points: The WikiProject Good Articles Medal of Merit
At least 60 points: The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
In addition, the person who accumulates the most points during the backlog elimination drive will receive the Content Review Medal of Merit |
The following list contains all nominations that are currently 90+ days old. A review of these articles is thus worth an extra half point.
The below articles have had their nominations abandoned, or need a second opinion.
Article | Review page | Notes |
---|---|---|
Ed Bradley | Talk:Ed Bradley/GA1 | Qualifies for extra .5 point |
Hermann Hoth | Talk:Hermann Hoth/GA1 | Qualifies for extra .5 point |
Dick Molpus | Talk:Dick Molpus/GA1 |
Keep a running total of your reviewing in the Participants section below by creating your own list. Only passes and fails will be recognised as completing a review. If necessary, you can put the article on hold if the article needs to be edited further to be passed. Each of your reviews should be included in your list. Article reviews started before 30 June but completed after 30 June can be included in the running total – however should be completed as quickly as possible to avoid being too late. Reviews started before 1 June do not count. Please state if the article is a pass, fail, or on hold. Make sure you follow up on reviews that you have started or placed on hold.
A sample review section is below; all sections start with a fourth-level header containing the editor's username and the {{ Div col}} and {{ Div col end}} templates. Between those templates, each article reviewed is given its own line. Use the "GA" icon line for an article that passes, the "FGAN" icon line for an article that fails, the "GAH" icon line for an article where the initial review is complete and has been placed on hold, and the "GAN" icon line for an article where the review has started but has not yet been placed on hold. (Change "GAN" and "GAH" to "GA" or "FGAN" when the article passes or fails.) If the nomination is identified above as old when you begin your review, add "(old)" after the link to the nomination page. Following the {{ Div col end}} template are two lines to tabulate each participant's total number of articles reviewed and the total number of old nominations reviewed.
====[[User:Username|Username]]==== {{Div col}} #{{icon|GA}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old) #{{icon|FGAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] #{{icon|GAH}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old) #{{icon|GAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] {{Div col end}} <small>'''Articles reviewed:''' <br>'''Old nominations reviewed:'''</small>
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 13
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 14
Old nominations reviewed: 9
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 16
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 9
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Note: am a new GA reviewer. I would appreciate any comments on my reviews and confirmation if I am doing them properly. I want to help, not create more work so please let me know if I am achieving that aim. Also, I note when I started the reviews, the bot added notices to the nominators talk page and did everything properly. Both times when I finished the review though, (following instructions and using the templates), the bot never left notices on nom. Also, I notice the Good Article icon has not updated, it is on the right hand side however the class icon remains B. Thanks MaxnaCarta ( talk) 03:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
I'm not going to finish my review in time, but just wanted to say thank you for running this drive and that it inspired me to start a review. :)
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Main | Criteria | Instructions | Nominations | Backlog drives | Mentorship | Discussion | Reassessment | Report |
The June 2022 GAN Backlog Drive is a one-month-long effort to reduce the backlog of Good Article nominations. Please review articles according to the GA criteria and the Manual of Style; we also recommend the essays What the Good article criteria are not and Reviewing good articles. The co-ordinators for this drive are Buidhe, Hog Farm, Trainsandotherthings, Harrias, Kavyansh.Singh, and Shushugah. The drive began on 1 June 2022 at 00:00:00 (UTC) and ended on 30 June 2022 at 23:59:59 (UTC).
The ultimate goal of this backlog elimination drive is to promote high-quality reviewing and cut the number of outstanding GANs and in particular those which have been in the queue 90 days or more. Awards will be given out to those individuals who do the most work in helping reduce the size of the backlog.
Numbers are reported as described here.
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
Date | Outstanding nominations |
Unreviewed nominations |
Change since previous day [N 1] |
Change since beginning [N 1] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 June 2022 | 602 | 520 | — | — |
2 June 2022 | 602 | 487 | 33 (6.3%) | 33 (6.3%) |
3 June 2022 | 588 | 456 | 31 (6.4%) | 64 (12.3%) |
4 June 2022 | 583 | 446 | 10 (2.2%) | 74 (14.2%) |
5 June 2022 | 584 | 433 | 13 (2.9%) | 87 (16.7%) |
6 June 2022 | 563 | 412 | 21 (4.8%) | 108 (20.8%) |
7 June 2022 | 547 | 398 | 14 (3.4%) | 122 (23.5%) |
8 June 2022 | 536 | 388 | 10 (2.5%) | 132 (25.4%) |
9 June 2022 | 533 | 384 | 4 (1%) | 136 (26.2%) |
10 June 2022 | 533 | 385 | 1 (0.3%) | 135 (26%) |
11 June 2022 | 529 | 381 | 4 (1%) | 139 (26.7%) |
12 June 2022 | 528 | 379 | 2 (0.5%) | 141 (27.1%) |
13 June 2022 | 527 | 382 | 3 (0.8%) | 138 (26.5%) |
14 June 2022 | 523 | 379 | 3 (0.8%) | 141 (27.1%) |
15 June 2022 | 519 | 378 | 1 (0.3%) | 142 (27.3%) |
16 June 2022 | 519 | 374 | 4 (1.1%) | 146 (28.1%) |
17 June 2022 | 513 | 371 | 3 (0.8%) | 149 (28.7%) |
18 June 2022 | 508 | 372 | 1 (0.3%) | 148 (28.5%) |
19 June 2022 | 505 | 368 | 4 (1.1%) | 152 (29.2%) |
20 June 2022 | 506 | 373 | 5 (1.4%) | 147 (28.3%) |
21 June 2022 | 504 | 374 | 1 (0.3%) | 146 (28.1%) |
22 June 2022 | 504 | 376 | 2 (0.5%) | 144 (27.7%) |
23 June 2022 | 501 | 373 | 3 (0.8%) | 147 (28.3%) |
24 June 2022 | 493 | 364 | 9 (2.4%) | 156 (30%) |
25 June 2022 | 494 | 366 | 2 (0.5%) | 154 (29.6%) |
26 June 2022 | 490 | 361 | 5 (1.4%) | 159 (30.6%) |
27 June 2022 | 485 | 357 | 4 (1.1%) | 163 (31.3%) |
28 June 2022 | 485 | 363 | 6 (1.7%) | 157 (30.2%) |
29 June 2022 | 481 | 365 | 2 (0.6%) | 155 (29.8%) |
30 June 2022 | 477 | 364 | 1 (0.3%) | 156 (30%) |
1 July 2022 | 473 | 366 | 2 (0.5%) | 154 (29.6%) |
To receive an award, please include your name and the number of reviews you have completed as part of this drive. Awards will be given by the co-ordinators after this drive ends.
This is the scheme for the awards:
At least 3 points: The Invisible Barnstar
At least 7 points: The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
At least 15 points: The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
At least 20 points: The Reviewer Barnstar
At least 30 points: The Multiple Good Article Reviewer Barnstar
At least 40 points: The WikiProject Good Articles Medal of Merit
At least 60 points: The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
In addition, the person who accumulates the most points during the backlog elimination drive will receive the Content Review Medal of Merit |
The following list contains all nominations that are currently 90+ days old. A review of these articles is thus worth an extra half point.
The below articles have had their nominations abandoned, or need a second opinion.
Article | Review page | Notes |
---|---|---|
Ed Bradley | Talk:Ed Bradley/GA1 | Qualifies for extra .5 point |
Hermann Hoth | Talk:Hermann Hoth/GA1 | Qualifies for extra .5 point |
Dick Molpus | Talk:Dick Molpus/GA1 |
Keep a running total of your reviewing in the Participants section below by creating your own list. Only passes and fails will be recognised as completing a review. If necessary, you can put the article on hold if the article needs to be edited further to be passed. Each of your reviews should be included in your list. Article reviews started before 30 June but completed after 30 June can be included in the running total – however should be completed as quickly as possible to avoid being too late. Reviews started before 1 June do not count. Please state if the article is a pass, fail, or on hold. Make sure you follow up on reviews that you have started or placed on hold.
A sample review section is below; all sections start with a fourth-level header containing the editor's username and the {{ Div col}} and {{ Div col end}} templates. Between those templates, each article reviewed is given its own line. Use the "GA" icon line for an article that passes, the "FGAN" icon line for an article that fails, the "GAH" icon line for an article where the initial review is complete and has been placed on hold, and the "GAN" icon line for an article where the review has started but has not yet been placed on hold. (Change "GAN" and "GAH" to "GA" or "FGAN" when the article passes or fails.) If the nomination is identified above as old when you begin your review, add "(old)" after the link to the nomination page. Following the {{ Div col end}} template are two lines to tabulate each participant's total number of articles reviewed and the total number of old nominations reviewed.
====[[User:Username|Username]]==== {{Div col}} #{{icon|GA}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old) #{{icon|FGAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] #{{icon|GAH}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] (old) #{{icon|GAN}} [[Talk:Articlename/GAn|Articlename]] {{Div col end}} <small>'''Articles reviewed:''' <br>'''Old nominations reviewed:'''</small>
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 13
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 14
Old nominations reviewed: 9
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 6
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 16
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 9
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 11
Old nominations reviewed: 8
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Note: am a new GA reviewer. I would appreciate any comments on my reviews and confirmation if I am doing them properly. I want to help, not create more work so please let me know if I am achieving that aim. Also, I note when I started the reviews, the bot added notices to the nominators talk page and did everything properly. Both times when I finished the review though, (following instructions and using the templates), the bot never left notices on nom. Also, I notice the Good Article icon has not updated, it is on the right hand side however the class icon remains B. Thanks MaxnaCarta ( talk) 03:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Articles reviewed: 3
Old nominations reviewed: 3
Articles reviewed: 2
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 4
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 1
Old nominations reviewed: 1
I'm not going to finish my review in time, but just wanted to say thank you for running this drive and that it inspired me to start a review. :)
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 7
Old nominations reviewed: 1
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 2
Articles reviewed:
Old nominations reviewed:
Articles reviewed: 5
Old nominations reviewed: 4
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0
Articles reviewed: 0
Old nominations reviewed: 0