The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 3:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
Thirteen years have passed since the article's promotion as Featured Article in March 2008. Issues about reliability of sources were raised initially by Hog Farm. Among the list of questionable sources are self-published sources and forum posts. There have been edits since the thread there was created at least two weeks ago. However, AFAICS, edits not yet challenged have been usually cleanups. Other edits have been reverted. The sourcing issue still hasn't been addressed. George Ho ( talk) 03:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not a thorough read; just what I picked up on a quick glance. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply
Not looking too bad, but for a 9,000 word article, that's an awfully small lead. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply
George Ho are you following? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Looking at today's edits, Snowfire made these changes.
@ WP:FAR coordinators: this is abusive; can we please shut this down? I raised just yesterday (see my post at 01:18, 2 March 2022) that Snowfire had removed a non-reliable source, and merged all of the remaining text under one reliable source, which did not support the text. Upon rechecking tonight, the same continues. In this edit, Snowfire removes a non-reliable source, leaving the entire paragraph cited to one reliable source. The source does not verify the content of the entire paragraph. I don't believe Snowfire should be editing this article. At. All. Also, this from Nikkimaria; page numbers cited are not adding up. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot ( talk) 3:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC) [1].
Thirteen years have passed since the article's promotion as Featured Article in March 2008. Issues about reliability of sources were raised initially by Hog Farm. Among the list of questionable sources are self-published sources and forum posts. There have been edits since the thread there was created at least two weeks ago. However, AFAICS, edits not yet challenged have been usually cleanups. Other edits have been reverted. The sourcing issue still hasn't been addressed. George Ho ( talk) 03:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply
Not a thorough read; just what I picked up on a quick glance. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply
Not looking too bad, but for a 9,000 word article, that's an awfully small lead. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 22:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC) reply
George Ho are you following? SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC) reply
Looking at today's edits, Snowfire made these changes.
@ WP:FAR coordinators: this is abusive; can we please shut this down? I raised just yesterday (see my post at 01:18, 2 March 2022) that Snowfire had removed a non-reliable source, and merged all of the remaining text under one reliable source, which did not support the text. Upon rechecking tonight, the same continues. In this edit, Snowfire removes a non-reliable source, leaving the entire paragraph cited to one reliable source. The source does not verify the content of the entire paragraph. I don't believe Snowfire should be editing this article. At. All. Also, this from Nikkimaria; page numbers cited are not adding up. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 04:45, 3 March 2022 (UTC) reply