This user may have left Wikipedia. AustralianRupert has not edited Wikipedia since January 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
There is a proverb that says all (I won't say "good") things must come to an end, and indeed it is time for me to cease my involvement with Wikipedia. For some time I have been losing my desire to contribute content to the site. For awhile I tried to busy myself with admin work or minor edits, however, now it is time to down tools completely and call stumps. I am sorry to say, but I no longer gain enjoyment from my time here. I haven't for many years now but for some reason felt compelled to help maintain what we had started. But, it is too easy for hard work to be destroyed. It is too time consuming to have to continually check watchlists to try to prevent uncited content or misinformation being inserted. It is too odious having to argue with irrational people for the pursuit of a hobby. Too disheartening seeing the good work of others torn asunder or deleted.
It is too depressing seeing friends depart, both online and in real life. It is too impactful having strangers cast aspersions about one's politics without ever having met one. I have grown tired of the increasing politicisation of the site, the agendas of some editors and the continuing assault on the sense of community that once seemed to be the best aspect of the site. There are more important things in life than arguing with people on the internet.
That said, I will forever remain grateful for having had the opportunity to work with many dedicated volunteers from many different walks of life, with many different perspectives. If not for Wikipedia, I doubt I'd ever have been exposed to such diversity of thought. I have learnt a lot from my time here. Most of it was positive, although, I will continue to regret some aspects forever. I had the good fortune to collaborate with some incredible editors on a diverse range of topics; I remain in awe of what a few dedicated editors pulling in the same direction can produce, but I have also seen the opposite. I hope that there will be more of the former than the latter as Wikipedia proceeds into its third decade. Until we meet again. Bona fortuna. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Job Done | ||
For good services as an admin, and for resigning the tools in a noble manner. Presented by SilkTork ( talk) 12:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)) |
private project | |
Thank you for quality articles persuing your private project, such as Battle of Milne Bay, that "first broke the spell of the invincibility", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (22 February 2010)! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC) |
repeated as farewell, and note the old style of the first year, almost 10 years ago, quality that will be missed -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't recall if I ever interacted with you directly, but I am saddened somewhat to see that a long-time administrator has laid down the mop. I would, however, like to bestow this userbox I just created, making you the first recipient:
This user is an administrator emeritus on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) |
— Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. We miss you. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you today for Bougainville counterattack, introduced (in 2018): "This article covers what must be one of the worst military blunders of World War II. In March 1944 around 15,000 Japanese troops attempted to attack fortified positions on the island of Bougainville which were held by 62,000 Americans who knew that they were coming. While the Japanese fought bravely, the offensive ended in total failure, with the veteran US Army units stopping the attack in a matter of days."! --
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between January and March 2022.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 06:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
This user may have left Wikipedia. AustralianRupert has not edited Wikipedia since January 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
There is a proverb that says all (I won't say "good") things must come to an end, and indeed it is time for me to cease my involvement with Wikipedia. For some time I have been losing my desire to contribute content to the site. For awhile I tried to busy myself with admin work or minor edits, however, now it is time to down tools completely and call stumps. I am sorry to say, but I no longer gain enjoyment from my time here. I haven't for many years now but for some reason felt compelled to help maintain what we had started. But, it is too easy for hard work to be destroyed. It is too time consuming to have to continually check watchlists to try to prevent uncited content or misinformation being inserted. It is too odious having to argue with irrational people for the pursuit of a hobby. Too disheartening seeing the good work of others torn asunder or deleted.
It is too depressing seeing friends depart, both online and in real life. It is too impactful having strangers cast aspersions about one's politics without ever having met one. I have grown tired of the increasing politicisation of the site, the agendas of some editors and the continuing assault on the sense of community that once seemed to be the best aspect of the site. There are more important things in life than arguing with people on the internet.
That said, I will forever remain grateful for having had the opportunity to work with many dedicated volunteers from many different walks of life, with many different perspectives. If not for Wikipedia, I doubt I'd ever have been exposed to such diversity of thought. I have learnt a lot from my time here. Most of it was positive, although, I will continue to regret some aspects forever. I had the good fortune to collaborate with some incredible editors on a diverse range of topics; I remain in awe of what a few dedicated editors pulling in the same direction can produce, but I have also seen the opposite. I hope that there will be more of the former than the latter as Wikipedia proceeds into its third decade. Until we meet again. Bona fortuna. Regards, AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Job Done | ||
For good services as an admin, and for resigning the tools in a noble manner. Presented by SilkTork ( talk) 12:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)) |
private project | |
Thank you for quality articles persuing your private project, such as Battle of Milne Bay, that "first broke the spell of the invincibility", - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (22 February 2010)! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC) |
repeated as farewell, and note the old style of the first year, almost 10 years ago, quality that will be missed -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:46, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
I don't recall if I ever interacted with you directly, but I am saddened somewhat to see that a long-time administrator has laid down the mop. I would, however, like to bestow this userbox I just created, making you the first recipient:
This user is an administrator emeritus on the English Wikipedia. ( verify) |
— Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 20:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. We miss you. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you today for Bougainville counterattack, introduced (in 2018): "This article covers what must be one of the worst military blunders of World War II. In March 1944 around 15,000 Japanese troops attempted to attack fortified positions on the island of Bougainville which were held by 62,000 Americans who knew that they were coming. While the Japanese fought bravely, the offensive ended in total failure, with the veteran US Army units stopping the attack in a matter of days."! --
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between January and March 2022.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 06:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|