There are currently 3 filled queues. Admins, please consider promoting a prep to queue if you have the time!
Did you know? | |
---|---|
Introduction and rules | |
Introduction | WP:DYK |
General discussion | WT:DYK |
Guidelines | WP:DYKCRIT |
Reviewer instructions | WP:DYKRI |
Nominations | |
Nominate an article | WP:DYKCNN |
Awaiting approval | WP:DYKN |
Approved | WP:DYKNA |
April 1 hooks | WP:DYKAPRIL |
Preparation | |
Preps and queues | T:DYK/Q |
Prepper instructions | WP:DYKPBI |
Admin instructions | WP:DYKAI |
Main Page errors | WP:ERRORS |
History | |
Statistics | WP:DYKSTATS |
Archived sets | WP:DYKA |
Just for fun | |
Monthly wraps | WP:DYKW |
Awards | WP:DYKAWARDS |
Userboxes | WP:DYKUBX |
Hall of Fame | WP:DYK/HoF |
List of users ... | |
... by nominations | WP:DYKNC |
... by promotions | WP:DYKPC |
Administrative | |
Scripts and bots | WP:DYKSB |
On the Main Page | |
To ping the DYK admins | {{ DYK admins}} |
This page is to nominate fresh articles to appear in the " Did you know" section on the Main Page with a "hook" (an interesting note). Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area and then promoted into the Queue. To update this page, it.
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
February 28 | 1 | |
March 2 | ||
March 12 | 1 | |
March 14 | 1 | |
March 19 | 1 | |
March 24 | 1 | |
March 25 | 3 | |
March 30 | 2 | |
March 31 | 1 | |
April 1 | 1 | |
April 2 | 4 | 2 |
April 4 | 4 | 1 |
April 5 | 3 | 3 |
April 6 | 7 | 6 |
April 7 | 8 | 7 |
April 8 | 7 | 6 |
April 9 | 6 | 3 |
April 10 | 4 | 3 |
April 11 | 1 | 1 |
April 12 | 3 | 3 |
April 13 | 17 | 12 |
April 14 | 7 | 2 |
April 15 | 12 | 9 |
April 16 | 8 | 6 |
April 17 | 10 | 7 |
April 18 | 9 | 5 |
April 19 | 10 | 6 |
April 20 | 11 | 8 |
April 21 | 9 | 6 |
April 22 | 5 | 1 |
April 23 | 7 | 3 |
April 24 | 9 | 2 |
April 25 | ||
Total | 173 | 102 |
Last updated 00:51, 25 April 2024
UTC Current time is 01:36, 25 April 2024 UTC [ refresh |
If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing. Further information can be found at the supplementary guidelines.
How do I write an interesting hook?
Successful hooks tend to have several traits. Most importantly, they share a surprising or intriguing fact. They give readers enough context to understand the hook, but leave enough out to make them want to learn more. They are written for a general audience who has no prior knowledge of or interest in the topic area. Lastly, they are concise, and do not attempt to cover multiple facts or present information about the subject beyond what's needed to understand the hook.
When will my nomination be reviewed?
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first, it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions below).
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria ( long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.
To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:
If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a line
Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* -->
showing you where you should put the comment.If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.
At-a-glance instructions on how to promote an approved hook to a prep area
|
---|
For more information, please see T:TDYK#How to promote an accepted hook. |
Handy copy sources:
To [[T:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
To [[T:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
To [[T:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
To [[T:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
To [[T:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
To [[T:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
To [[T:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]
{{DYKsubpage
with {{subst:DYKsubpage
, and replace |passed=
with |passed=no
. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kirby: King of Comics; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
I have pulled this nom from prep, as it fails to include a summary of the book's contents and thus fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. It also contains at least two errors, one which says Evanier "obtained" artworks from Kirby "while working for him" - he only obtained access, and not apparently while working for him, and another which says the book was met with "positive" reviews when in fact it was panned by The Guardian critic. The article clearly needs more work before it can be featured, if it should be featured at all given the apparent errors. Gatoclass ( talk) 09:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I took a look at this. The summary is extremely short, to the point of remaining woefully incomplete. Still fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. Time to pass on this as the nominator just isn't accepting what they are being told. 4meter4 ( talk) 13:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by NinetyNineDragon ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Forever Young (horse); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for this positive article about a racehorse. The picture is nice, too. Just two issues:
If you can resolve the above two issues, then this nomination should be good to go. Storye book ( talk) 11:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Note: @ NinetyNineDragon: As of this edit on 16 April 2024, the article has had a number of new edits, but the above issues have not been addressed. Please resolve this? Thank you. Storye book ( talk) 11:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Update: @ NinetyNineDragon: Points (1) and (2) above have still not been addressed. Please do that? Thank you. Storye book ( talk) 09:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The executed Nicholas II of Russia. The queen that never set foot in her country, Alexandra of Yugoslavia. Accomplished Olympian Constantine II of Greece. The last king of the Congo, Baudouin of Belgium. An heir forging his 21st-century path, William, Prince of Wales. What do all of these people have in common (besides being royals)? They can claim descent from the Father-in-law of Europe, Christian IX of Denmark!
If this DYK is approved, readers will be enticed to learn about how the royal families of Europe are biological relatives to a closer extent than some may think! Created by AndrewPeterT ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
@
AndrewPeterT: Hi, there! I will be reviewing this Did You Know nomination. -
Therealscorp1an (
talk) 23:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK eligibility scan results: (See here for details.)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Yes Therealscorp1an ( talk) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
@ AndrewPeterT: Well done for nominating this article, a topic that is of great interest to me. The hook I prefer is ALT0. As you'd know, there are a few criteria for DYK:
So, in summary, all that needs to be addressed is the sourcing within tables and a few spelling and grammar mistakes. I am also a bit concerned with the amount of WP:WHITESPACE. If this can't be fixed, it is not too much of a concern. Please let me know if you need any assistance or clarification. I hope this helps and I look forward to hopefully having this in DYK. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an ( talk) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.(Ping me) On hold for merge discussion. Geardona ( talk to me?) 04:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 116 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Cambalachero ( talk) 15:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hook is interesting and the article is in good shape. I'll leave it up to the nominator or promoter to change the hooks in the way I suggested, but won't fuss over it. Added clarification tags where needed. Sounder Bruce 04:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.X ( talk) 21:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page. ᵀʰᵃᵗ ᵒⁿᵉ ᵈᵘᵈᵉ ʷʰᵒ ᵐᵃᵈᵉ ᵃˡˡ ᵗʰᵉ ˢᵖᵃᶜᵉ ᵃʳᵗᶦᶜˡᵉˢ ( talk) 16:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
I shall review this. Storye book ( talk) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for this fascinating article. It has two issues, plus I think we still need final confirmation that the hooks are all true:
When the above issues are resolved, This nomination could be passed.
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.SWinxy ( talk) 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: The article presents a comprehensive overview of Malchow's life, career, and contributions to political consulting, and meets the newness, length, sourcing, neutrality, and copyvio-free criteria. Offline sources were accepted in good faith. he article and hook meet all the required criteria for inclusion in the DYK section of Wikipedia, with no subjective issues identified. el.ziade ( talkallam) 09:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't see anything in particular that's a problem herein opening it up for discussion. Pinging Schwede66 for completion. Sorry for dragging this out, but I just think it's a fine premise for a hook. Could it be reworded in a way that retains it? SWinxy ( talk) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Anonymous 16:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, and is well-sourced, but the source used here has an issue (see Buxton comments below). Possibly hook could be improved (see comment below), a really interesting article John Cummings ( talk) 19:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 157 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.detriaskies 22:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
Just a quick note, as someone who write a lot of reception sections on various media. I think we have to remember what "mixed" means. It does not mean "medium". It means "it varied". So, it's not really that tall of a hurdle to warrant its use. Any time you have some both positive and negative sentiments you can pretty much rightfully include it. And honestly, with the way many editor tend to POV-push positive sentiments for things they like (or the opposite for things they dislike) I think its honestly commendable that a more neutral route was taken here. Unless there's actually good-faith confusion on whether or not there is both positive and negative sentiments present in the section, I don't believe its WP:OR. Sergecross73 msg me 17:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 504 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A good, thorough, and necessary article. Thank you. Good to go.
@ AirshipJungleman29 and Storye book: Fair point. But that is IMHO very boring. How about a balanced hook - ALT2 below: -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Brudelman ( talk) 05:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 37 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Makeandtoss ( talk) 13:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC).
My objection is now outdated. Events and sources are moving. starship .paint ( RUN) 02:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
@
Makeandtoss: - you are assuming too much of the sources. (1) Bellingcat does not say three consecutive strikes, they simply say Israeli airstrike, Bellingcat cannot confirm that it was missiles or that they were even fired by a drone: Although not possible to be certain without fragments of the munition itself, the WCK vehicles bear the hallmarks of a precision strike by inert or low-yield missiles ... In order to successfully accomplish a laser guided strike it is necessary for a platform, such as a drone, to “illuminate” the target with a laser while the missile is launched.(2) BBC writes that the evidence suggests there was more than one strike, but this is not confirmation, BBC's experts also do not confirm that it was a drone strike: Chris Cobb-Smith, a former British Army officer and ex-UN weapons inspector, said the attack was probably the result of drone-launched Spike missiles ... Justin Crump, a former British Army officer who runs Sibylline - a risk intelligence company - agreed. He says the attack "was likely drone-launched and targeted". He added the strike had probably been caused by a missile, rather than a bomb or mortar.(3) Al Jazeera goes the furthest, their article text says The shelling targeted three vehicles belonging to WCK, one at a time, but if you read the article text, there is no mention of drone missiles, instead they say: Analysis of images of the second and third targeted vehicles showed signs of a projectile entering from the top and exiting through the bottom, suggesting that the cars were targeted from the air.Now, Al Jazeera's image does mention "drone strikes" and missiles, but I find it peculiar that they didn't mention (or even attempt to explain) it in the article text. The sources are simply weaker than you portray them to be. None of them confirm, all of them are simply suggesting / probably / likely etc. starship .paint ( RUN) 11:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Can I suggest some edits to the hook to make it clearer what happened? I'd suggest something like Humanitarian and aid organizations suspended their operations in the Gaza Strip after seven World Central Kitchen aid workers were killed when their marked cars on a preapproved route were bombed by Israeli drones. I think its really important to make clear they were in marked cars, they were also on a route approved by the Israeli military. Makeandtoss what do you think? Also have any additional sources been published that would resolve the dissagreement above? If not maybe a third party could be involved to help resolve if the sourcing meets Wikipedia's rules. John Cummings ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Please note that this is also nominated at ITN. It can only reach the main page through one of the possible venues. At this point, there isn't consensus to post to ITN, but that can change. Schwede 66 02:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Starship.paint: @ John Cummings: Thanks for commenting. Starship.paint, building on our discussion on the talk page, I think we can both agree to this ALT1 version: ... that the attack on World Central Kitchen convoy in the Gaza Strip, which killed seven aid workers, was likely a result of three consecutive missiles fired by an Israeli drone? Makeandtoss ( talk) 14:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Makeandtoss, 4meter4, John Cummings, and Narutolovehinata5: I've hatted my objection above due to recent events: the IDF's admission, which I believe supports this hook: starship .paint ( RUN) 02:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)@ FortunateSons: - forgot to ping. starship .paint ( RUN) 02:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
ALT2 ... that the Israel Defense Forces have accepted responsibility for killing seven World Central Kitchen aid workers in targeted drone strikes that destroyed the aid workers' cars, one by one? Source 1: Associated Press Source 2: CBS News Source 3: BBC News starship .paint ( RUN) 02:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
A severe earthquake strikes near Hualien City, Taiwan ... In Syria, an Israeli airstrike kills 16 people at the Iranian consulate in Damascus, including brigadier general Mohammad Reza Zahedi ... A bus falls from a bridge in Limpopo, South Africa, killing 45 people ... The Francis Scott Key Bridge in the U.S. city of Baltimore collapses after being hit by a container ship.starship .paint ( RUN) 06:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
There are also moments, like the last few days in the Middle East, when events leave belligerents and their allies at a crossroads with big decisions to make ... The killing of foreign aid workers in Gaza might finally exhaust the considerable patience of Israel's allies, led by the United States.and Reuters:
the killing of a group of aid workers by an Israeli air strike summed up both the dire humanitarian crisis and the lack of a clear way out of a conflict that is leaving Israel increasingly isolated. The attack on Monday night that killed seven staff of the World Central Kitchen (WCK) aid group, including six foreigners, has angered even some of Israel's closest allies, adding to growing pressure for an end to the fighting.starship .paint ( RUN) 07:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 160 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 24 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Bogger ( talk) 10:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
second opinion and full review needed. Bruxton ( talk) 14:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Casablanca 🪨( T) 16:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 156 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Thank you for this nomination - it is much appreciated that you have done this.
Good to go. Storye book ( talk) 16:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Santi ( talk) 21:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Davest3r08 >:3 ( talk) 16:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 162 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 364 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.John Cummings ( talk) 10:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Aneirinn ( talk) 23:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: The article was not 5x expanded. It was 1534 prose characters pre-expansion and is currently at 3027 prose characters. This nomination could pass if the article is further expanded. Also, the source for ALT0 doesn't mention that this was the shortest Texas speaker term, just that his term was 7 days. There could be a second source added to provide all the information. Copyvio check fine. No QPQ required. ALT0 is more interesting in my opinion. Riley1012 ( talk) 00:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Resonant Distortion 19:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 506 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Battleofalma ( talk) 06:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 81 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) 01:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 529 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.– Muboshgu ( talk) 00:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - 1 remaining
Overall:
@
Muboshgu: Nice work. Everything looks good except for the QPQ.
Epicgenius (
talk) 14:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.hinnk ( talk) 00:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 94 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Lajmmoore ( talk) 16:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I would prefer more links and would suggest moving the bold link closer to the start of the sentence, but those are optional Lajmmoore. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Borg Axoim ( talk) 16:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The nominated article has one paragraph without a citation. The uncited paragraph could be supported in part by pages 11 and 121 of Mount Rushmore by Gilbert C. Fite, it talks about the Hot Springs Star's editorial stance. https://archive.org/details/mountrushmore00univ/page/121 I also suggest that an alternate wording like "that early environmentalists like Cora Babbitt Johnson almost prevented..." rather than the current wording.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 377 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 15:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 216 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 12:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 44 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ミラP@ Miraclepine 22:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Owenglyndur ( talk) 07:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: This nomination still needs work. As it's your first nomination, I'm happy to give you time to improve this. But, at minimum, you need to settle on an interesting hook with a reliable source that you can clearly cite for it. Unsourced sections need to either be removed, or reliable sources cited inline with them. Grnrchst ( talk) 13:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 196 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Maury Markowitz ( talk) 23:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 15:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.InformationToKnowledge ( talk) 08:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
References
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 164 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 378 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 09:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I moved the title to your request. As for the article, it looks alright. AGF on the offline hook source. Approving. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Xia talk to me 18:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC).
The "American people" appear with conspicuous infrequency, in Mark H. Leff, review of Freedom from Fear, Journal of American History 87, no. 2 (September 2000): 723.
Kennedy has essentially written two books, each of which would require almost no revision to stand alone, in Mark H. Leff, review of Freedom from Fear, Journal of American History 87, no. 2 (September 2000): 723.
This is a monumental book in so many ways, the least of which is its bulk: over nine hundred pages, some six pounds, in Harvard Sitkoff, review of Freedom from Fear, American Historical Review 105, no. 3 (June 2000): 954–955, here 954.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 23:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 258 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Bloom6132 ( talk) 21:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 507 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
PS. I forgot to mention - there are plenty of images available for this hook. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Zapad_2009 -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.GMH Melbourne ( talk) 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Article is new and long enough. Sourcing looks good though Earwig found a handful of word-for-word similarities with "theage.com.au" source. A minor issue with each of the proposed hooks: ALT0 says that Williams was Victoria's most high-profile prisoner - the body of the article supports that but the sources seem to claim he was just a high-profile prisoner. ALT1 says they threw feces at a member of the jury but the article and sources only say "excrement". Both hooks are interesting however. QPQ is not required so just need hooks fixed and that should be all. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 197 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Maury Markowitz ( talk) 23:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 19 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Found5dollar ( talk) 19:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
hinnk (
talk) 22:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 221 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 10:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Yug (talk) 🐲 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, is well sourced to news outlets, and it plagiarism free. There are two notes in the article that need addressing: one "who?" after 'commenters' - please be specific. Also there is a citation needed, please add a reference. No QPQ is required. Hook is cited, but I'm not sure it is the most interesting option? The striking thing seems to be the connections between the octopus and Tiktok, so perhaps that could be an alternative hook? Picture is free, and the background is clear, but the actual octopus (which is isn't Terrance) is quite blurry. Overall a nice article, thank you! Lajmmoore ( talk) 22:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 222 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 19:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Dionysius Miller talk 18:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 508 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.🌿MtBotany ( talk) 19:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 217 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 08:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 07:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 224 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 12:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 07:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.– Illegitimate Barrister ( talk • contribs), 02:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 113 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.-- evrik ( talk) 21:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 28 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Riley1012 ( talk) 21:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 29 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Smurrayinchester 11:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 218 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 04:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 244 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.( t · c) buidhe 23:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Di (they-them) ( talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Spaghettifier ( talk) 22:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 33 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.MartinPoulter ( talk) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 08:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - pending
Overall:
Looks good. QPQ pending.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.🌸wasianpower🌸 ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
The holding area is near the top of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.
There are currently 3 filled queues. Admins, please consider promoting a prep to queue if you have the time!
Did you know? | |
---|---|
Introduction and rules | |
Introduction | WP:DYK |
General discussion | WT:DYK |
Guidelines | WP:DYKCRIT |
Reviewer instructions | WP:DYKRI |
Nominations | |
Nominate an article | WP:DYKCNN |
Awaiting approval | WP:DYKN |
Approved | WP:DYKNA |
April 1 hooks | WP:DYKAPRIL |
Preparation | |
Preps and queues | T:DYK/Q |
Prepper instructions | WP:DYKPBI |
Admin instructions | WP:DYKAI |
Main Page errors | WP:ERRORS |
History | |
Statistics | WP:DYKSTATS |
Archived sets | WP:DYKA |
Just for fun | |
Monthly wraps | WP:DYKW |
Awards | WP:DYKAWARDS |
Userboxes | WP:DYKUBX |
Hall of Fame | WP:DYK/HoF |
List of users ... | |
... by nominations | WP:DYKNC |
... by promotions | WP:DYKPC |
Administrative | |
Scripts and bots | WP:DYKSB |
On the Main Page | |
To ping the DYK admins | {{ DYK admins}} |
This page is to nominate fresh articles to appear in the " Did you know" section on the Main Page with a "hook" (an interesting note). Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area and then promoted into the Queue. To update this page, it.
Count of DYK Hooks | ||
Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
---|---|---|
February 28 | 1 | |
March 2 | ||
March 12 | 1 | |
March 14 | 1 | |
March 19 | 1 | |
March 24 | 1 | |
March 25 | 3 | |
March 30 | 2 | |
March 31 | 1 | |
April 1 | 1 | |
April 2 | 4 | 2 |
April 4 | 4 | 1 |
April 5 | 3 | 3 |
April 6 | 7 | 6 |
April 7 | 8 | 7 |
April 8 | 7 | 6 |
April 9 | 6 | 3 |
April 10 | 4 | 3 |
April 11 | 1 | 1 |
April 12 | 3 | 3 |
April 13 | 17 | 12 |
April 14 | 7 | 2 |
April 15 | 12 | 9 |
April 16 | 8 | 6 |
April 17 | 10 | 7 |
April 18 | 9 | 5 |
April 19 | 10 | 6 |
April 20 | 11 | 8 |
April 21 | 9 | 6 |
April 22 | 5 | 1 |
April 23 | 7 | 3 |
April 24 | 9 | 2 |
April 25 | ||
Total | 173 | 102 |
Last updated 00:51, 25 April 2024
UTC Current time is 01:36, 25 April 2024 UTC [ refresh |
If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing. Further information can be found at the supplementary guidelines.
How do I write an interesting hook?
Successful hooks tend to have several traits. Most importantly, they share a surprising or intriguing fact. They give readers enough context to understand the hook, but leave enough out to make them want to learn more. They are written for a general audience who has no prior knowledge of or interest in the topic area. Lastly, they are concise, and do not attempt to cover multiple facts or present information about the subject beyond what's needed to understand the hook.
When will my nomination be reviewed?
This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first, it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions below).
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.
If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria ( long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.
To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:
If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a line
Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :* -->
showing you where you should put the comment.If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.
At-a-glance instructions on how to promote an approved hook to a prep area
|
---|
For more information, please see T:TDYK#How to promote an accepted hook. |
Handy copy sources:
To [[T:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
To [[T:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
To [[T:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
To [[T:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
To [[T:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
To [[T:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
To [[T:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]
{{DYKsubpage
with {{subst:DYKsubpage
, and replace |passed=
with |passed=no
. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.5x expanded by OlifanofmrTennant ( talk). Self-nominated at 20:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kirby: King of Comics; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
I have pulled this nom from prep, as it fails to include a summary of the book's contents and thus fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. It also contains at least two errors, one which says Evanier "obtained" artworks from Kirby "while working for him" - he only obtained access, and not apparently while working for him, and another which says the book was met with "positive" reviews when in fact it was panned by The Guardian critic. The article clearly needs more work before it can be featured, if it should be featured at all given the apparent errors. Gatoclass ( talk) 09:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I took a look at this. The summary is extremely short, to the point of remaining woefully incomplete. Still fails WP:DYKCOMPLETE. Time to pass on this as the nominator just isn't accepting what they are being told. 4meter4 ( talk) 13:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by NinetyNineDragon ( talk). Self-nominated at 16:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Forever Young (horse); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for this positive article about a racehorse. The picture is nice, too. Just two issues:
If you can resolve the above two issues, then this nomination should be good to go. Storye book ( talk) 11:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Note: @ NinetyNineDragon: As of this edit on 16 April 2024, the article has had a number of new edits, but the above issues have not been addressed. Please resolve this? Thank you. Storye book ( talk) 11:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Update: @ NinetyNineDragon: Points (1) and (2) above have still not been addressed. Please do that? Thank you. Storye book ( talk) 09:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
The executed Nicholas II of Russia. The queen that never set foot in her country, Alexandra of Yugoslavia. Accomplished Olympian Constantine II of Greece. The last king of the Congo, Baudouin of Belgium. An heir forging his 21st-century path, William, Prince of Wales. What do all of these people have in common (besides being royals)? They can claim descent from the Father-in-law of Europe, Christian IX of Denmark!
If this DYK is approved, readers will be enticed to learn about how the royal families of Europe are biological relatives to a closer extent than some may think! Created by AndrewPeterT ( talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.
@
AndrewPeterT: Hi, there! I will be reviewing this Did You Know nomination. -
Therealscorp1an (
talk) 23:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK eligibility scan results: (See here for details.)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Yes Therealscorp1an ( talk) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
@ AndrewPeterT: Well done for nominating this article, a topic that is of great interest to me. The hook I prefer is ALT0. As you'd know, there are a few criteria for DYK:
So, in summary, all that needs to be addressed is the sourcing within tables and a few spelling and grammar mistakes. I am also a bit concerned with the amount of WP:WHITESPACE. If this can't be fixed, it is not too much of a concern. Please let me know if you need any assistance or clarification. I hope this helps and I look forward to hopefully having this in DYK. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an ( talk) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.(Ping me) On hold for merge discussion. Geardona ( talk to me?) 04:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 116 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Cambalachero ( talk) 15:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Hook is interesting and the article is in good shape. I'll leave it up to the nominator or promoter to change the hooks in the way I suggested, but won't fuss over it. Added clarification tags where needed. Sounder Bruce 04:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.X ( talk) 21:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page. ᵀʰᵃᵗ ᵒⁿᵉ ᵈᵘᵈᵉ ʷʰᵒ ᵐᵃᵈᵉ ᵃˡˡ ᵗʰᵉ ˢᵖᵃᶜᵉ ᵃʳᵗᶦᶜˡᵉˢ ( talk) 16:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
I shall review this. Storye book ( talk) 13:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for this fascinating article. It has two issues, plus I think we still need final confirmation that the hooks are all true:
When the above issues are resolved, This nomination could be passed.
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.SWinxy ( talk) 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: The article presents a comprehensive overview of Malchow's life, career, and contributions to political consulting, and meets the newness, length, sourcing, neutrality, and copyvio-free criteria. Offline sources were accepted in good faith. he article and hook meet all the required criteria for inclusion in the DYK section of Wikipedia, with no subjective issues identified. el.ziade ( talkallam) 09:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't see anything in particular that's a problem herein opening it up for discussion. Pinging Schwede66 for completion. Sorry for dragging this out, but I just think it's a fine premise for a hook. Could it be reworded in a way that retains it? SWinxy ( talk) 15:57, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Anonymous 16:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, and is well-sourced, but the source used here has an issue (see Buxton comments below). Possibly hook could be improved (see comment below), a really interesting article John Cummings ( talk) 19:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 157 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.detriaskies 22:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
Just a quick note, as someone who write a lot of reception sections on various media. I think we have to remember what "mixed" means. It does not mean "medium". It means "it varied". So, it's not really that tall of a hurdle to warrant its use. Any time you have some both positive and negative sentiments you can pretty much rightfully include it. And honestly, with the way many editor tend to POV-push positive sentiments for things they like (or the opposite for things they dislike) I think its honestly commendable that a more neutral route was taken here. Unless there's actually good-faith confusion on whether or not there is both positive and negative sentiments present in the section, I don't believe its WP:OR. Sergecross73 msg me 17:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 504 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A good, thorough, and necessary article. Thank you. Good to go.
@ AirshipJungleman29 and Storye book: Fair point. But that is IMHO very boring. How about a balanced hook - ALT2 below: -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Brudelman ( talk) 05:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 37 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Makeandtoss ( talk) 13:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC).
My objection is now outdated. Events and sources are moving. starship .paint ( RUN) 02:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
@
Makeandtoss: - you are assuming too much of the sources. (1) Bellingcat does not say three consecutive strikes, they simply say Israeli airstrike, Bellingcat cannot confirm that it was missiles or that they were even fired by a drone: Although not possible to be certain without fragments of the munition itself, the WCK vehicles bear the hallmarks of a precision strike by inert or low-yield missiles ... In order to successfully accomplish a laser guided strike it is necessary for a platform, such as a drone, to “illuminate” the target with a laser while the missile is launched.(2) BBC writes that the evidence suggests there was more than one strike, but this is not confirmation, BBC's experts also do not confirm that it was a drone strike: Chris Cobb-Smith, a former British Army officer and ex-UN weapons inspector, said the attack was probably the result of drone-launched Spike missiles ... Justin Crump, a former British Army officer who runs Sibylline - a risk intelligence company - agreed. He says the attack "was likely drone-launched and targeted". He added the strike had probably been caused by a missile, rather than a bomb or mortar.(3) Al Jazeera goes the furthest, their article text says The shelling targeted three vehicles belonging to WCK, one at a time, but if you read the article text, there is no mention of drone missiles, instead they say: Analysis of images of the second and third targeted vehicles showed signs of a projectile entering from the top and exiting through the bottom, suggesting that the cars were targeted from the air.Now, Al Jazeera's image does mention "drone strikes" and missiles, but I find it peculiar that they didn't mention (or even attempt to explain) it in the article text. The sources are simply weaker than you portray them to be. None of them confirm, all of them are simply suggesting / probably / likely etc. starship .paint ( RUN) 11:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Can I suggest some edits to the hook to make it clearer what happened? I'd suggest something like Humanitarian and aid organizations suspended their operations in the Gaza Strip after seven World Central Kitchen aid workers were killed when their marked cars on a preapproved route were bombed by Israeli drones. I think its really important to make clear they were in marked cars, they were also on a route approved by the Israeli military. Makeandtoss what do you think? Also have any additional sources been published that would resolve the dissagreement above? If not maybe a third party could be involved to help resolve if the sourcing meets Wikipedia's rules. John Cummings ( talk) 13:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Please note that this is also nominated at ITN. It can only reach the main page through one of the possible venues. At this point, there isn't consensus to post to ITN, but that can change. Schwede 66 02:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Starship.paint: @ John Cummings: Thanks for commenting. Starship.paint, building on our discussion on the talk page, I think we can both agree to this ALT1 version: ... that the attack on World Central Kitchen convoy in the Gaza Strip, which killed seven aid workers, was likely a result of three consecutive missiles fired by an Israeli drone? Makeandtoss ( talk) 14:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Makeandtoss, 4meter4, John Cummings, and Narutolovehinata5: I've hatted my objection above due to recent events: the IDF's admission, which I believe supports this hook: starship .paint ( RUN) 02:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)@ FortunateSons: - forgot to ping. starship .paint ( RUN) 02:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
ALT2 ... that the Israel Defense Forces have accepted responsibility for killing seven World Central Kitchen aid workers in targeted drone strikes that destroyed the aid workers' cars, one by one? Source 1: Associated Press Source 2: CBS News Source 3: BBC News starship .paint ( RUN) 02:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
A severe earthquake strikes near Hualien City, Taiwan ... In Syria, an Israeli airstrike kills 16 people at the Iranian consulate in Damascus, including brigadier general Mohammad Reza Zahedi ... A bus falls from a bridge in Limpopo, South Africa, killing 45 people ... The Francis Scott Key Bridge in the U.S. city of Baltimore collapses after being hit by a container ship.starship .paint ( RUN) 06:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
There are also moments, like the last few days in the Middle East, when events leave belligerents and their allies at a crossroads with big decisions to make ... The killing of foreign aid workers in Gaza might finally exhaust the considerable patience of Israel's allies, led by the United States.and Reuters:
the killing of a group of aid workers by an Israeli air strike summed up both the dire humanitarian crisis and the lack of a clear way out of a conflict that is leaving Israel increasingly isolated. The attack on Monday night that killed seven staff of the World Central Kitchen (WCK) aid group, including six foreigners, has angered even some of Israel's closest allies, adding to growing pressure for an end to the fighting.starship .paint ( RUN) 07:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 160 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 24 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Bogger ( talk) 10:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
second opinion and full review needed. Bruxton ( talk) 14:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Casablanca 🪨( T) 16:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 156 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Thank you for this nomination - it is much appreciated that you have done this.
Good to go. Storye book ( talk) 16:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Santi ( talk) 21:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Davest3r08 >:3 ( talk) 16:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 162 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 364 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.John Cummings ( talk) 10:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Aneirinn ( talk) 23:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: The article was not 5x expanded. It was 1534 prose characters pre-expansion and is currently at 3027 prose characters. This nomination could pass if the article is further expanded. Also, the source for ALT0 doesn't mention that this was the shortest Texas speaker term, just that his term was 7 days. There could be a second source added to provide all the information. Copyvio check fine. No QPQ required. ALT0 is more interesting in my opinion. Riley1012 ( talk) 00:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Resonant Distortion 19:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 506 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Battleofalma ( talk) 06:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 81 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ezlev ( user/ tlk/ ctrbs) 01:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 529 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.– Muboshgu ( talk) 00:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC). Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: - 1 remaining
Overall:
@
Muboshgu: Nice work. Everything looks good except for the QPQ.
Epicgenius (
talk) 14:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.hinnk ( talk) 00:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 94 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Lajmmoore ( talk) 16:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I would prefer more links and would suggest moving the bold link closer to the start of the sentence, but those are optional Lajmmoore. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 16:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Borg Axoim ( talk) 16:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The nominated article has one paragraph without a citation. The uncited paragraph could be supported in part by pages 11 and 121 of Mount Rushmore by Gilbert C. Fite, it talks about the Hot Springs Star's editorial stance. https://archive.org/details/mountrushmore00univ/page/121 I also suggest that an alternate wording like "that early environmentalists like Cora Babbitt Johnson almost prevented..." rather than the current wording.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 377 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 15:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 216 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 12:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 44 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.ミラP@ Miraclepine 22:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Owenglyndur ( talk) 07:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: This nomination still needs work. As it's your first nomination, I'm happy to give you time to improve this. But, at minimum, you need to settle on an interesting hook with a reliable source that you can clearly cite for it. Unsourced sections need to either be removed, or reliable sources cited inline with them. Grnrchst ( talk) 13:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 196 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Maury Markowitz ( talk) 23:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 15:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.InformationToKnowledge ( talk) 08:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC).
References
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 164 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.BeanieFan11 ( talk) 23:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 378 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Soman ( talk) 09:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: I moved the title to your request. As for the article, it looks alright. AGF on the offline hook source. Approving. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 02:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Xia talk to me 18:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC).
The "American people" appear with conspicuous infrequency, in Mark H. Leff, review of Freedom from Fear, Journal of American History 87, no. 2 (September 2000): 723.
Kennedy has essentially written two books, each of which would require almost no revision to stand alone, in Mark H. Leff, review of Freedom from Fear, Journal of American History 87, no. 2 (September 2000): 723.
This is a monumental book in so many ways, the least of which is its bulk: over nine hundred pages, some six pounds, in Harvard Sitkoff, review of Freedom from Fear, American Historical Review 105, no. 3 (June 2000): 954–955, here 954.
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 23:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 258 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Bloom6132 ( talk) 21:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 507 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
PS. I forgot to mention - there are plenty of images available for this hook. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Zapad_2009 -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.GMH Melbourne ( talk) 05:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
Article is new and long enough. Sourcing looks good though Earwig found a handful of word-for-word similarities with "theage.com.au" source. A minor issue with each of the proposed hooks: ALT0 says that Williams was Victoria's most high-profile prisoner - the body of the article supports that but the sources seem to claim he was just a high-profile prisoner. ALT1 says they threw feces at a member of the jury but the article and sources only say "excrement". Both hooks are interesting however. QPQ is not required so just need hooks fixed and that should be all. PCN02WPS ( talk | contribs) 15:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 197 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Maury Markowitz ( talk) 23:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 19 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Found5dollar ( talk) 19:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
hinnk (
talk) 22:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 221 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 10:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Yug (talk) 🐲 10:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
Image eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, is well sourced to news outlets, and it plagiarism free. There are two notes in the article that need addressing: one "who?" after 'commenters' - please be specific. Also there is a citation needed, please add a reference. No QPQ is required. Hook is cited, but I'm not sure it is the most interesting option? The striking thing seems to be the connections between the octopus and Tiktok, so perhaps that could be an alternative hook? Picture is free, and the background is clear, but the actual octopus (which is isn't Terrance) is quite blurry. Overall a nice article, thank you! Lajmmoore ( talk) 22:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 222 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 19:40, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Dionysius Miller talk 18:42, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 508 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.🌿MtBotany ( talk) 19:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 217 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 08:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Slgrandson ( How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 07:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 224 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Laun chba ller 12:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs) 07:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.– Illegitimate Barrister ( talk • contribs), 02:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 113 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.-- evrik ( talk) 21:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 28 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Riley1012 ( talk) 21:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 29 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Smurrayinchester 11:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 218 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 04:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 244 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.( t · c) buidhe 23:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Di (they-them) ( talk) 22:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Spaghettifier ( talk) 22:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 33 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.MartinPoulter ( talk) 14:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 219 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Juxlos ( talk) 08:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - pending
Overall:
Looks good. QPQ pending.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 23:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.🌸wasianpower🌸 ( talk • contribs) 01:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC).
The holding area is near the top of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.