The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No coverage in reliable sources. Remsense 诉 23:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robbie Williams discography as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 00:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NALBUM and GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 23:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The individual serves as a government official within a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The primary references in the article primarily revolve around his regional responsibilities and engagements, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Alternatively, some references focus on his familial relations, which do not contribute to the notability of the article per WP:INVALIDBIO. Ckfasdf ( talk) 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Malformed nomination. Article has been sent to draftspace due to lack of sources. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason Egezort ( talk) 22:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable. Thoroughly unconfirmable in all regards. Only one valid link which is remotely intelligible and it is a fluff interview. Claims she participated in Chinese filmmaking are debunked by a complete absence of any presence on IMDb. Nirva20 ( talk) 22:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes from Google Translate: "The name Bo Bonnie may be familiar to many Nanjing netizens, because when Xici Hutong was popular for a while, Bo Bonnie "has been haunted" in many movie music and literary editions, and she has also built her own discussion section. At that time, she was still in college. She was born in 1982 and is from Lianyungang. After graduating from high school, she was admitted to the film and television department of Nanjing University of the Arts, but after more than a year, she went to the Beijing Film Academy as an auditor. After that, she has experience in media work, column writing, and book publishing, and gradually clarified her writing direction. A few years ago, she was admitted to the Beijing Film Academy for a master's degree and systematically studied screenwriting."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bo is a legend. She once attracted much attention for being the top student in the college entrance examination who dropped out of school. She also became popular on the Internet because of "A Letter to My Sister"; she was affectionately called "the first in the West Temple" by netizens. Talented Girl", also participated in the screenwriting work of the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions" as the main force of "Youth Dream Team". After graduating from Beijing Film Academy with Zhao Wei [microblogging], she switched back and forth between the two professions of writer and screenwriter, non-stop. She is a post-80s female screenwriter and a leading figure in the new generation of writers."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhang Shanshan, who left Nanjing University of the Arts and went north, gave herself a new name called Bo Bonnie. ... In the summer of 2002, Zhang Shanshan, a former top student in the college entrance examination for arts in Jiangsu Province, chose to drop out; in 2007, Bo Bonnie, an auditor of the Beijing Film Academy, was admitted to the graduate school of the Beijing Film Academy and became Zhao Wei's classmate. ... This spring, Bonnie Bo was invited to Japan to interview female photographer Ninagawa Mika."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bai, whose name comes from the 1960s Hollywood love movie "Bonnie and Clyde", is the Bonnie who "looked at each other and smiled with Clyde, shot 167 times in the sun, fell to the ground and died". She fled from a university that "couldn't see her ideal", went to Beiying as an auditor, and was admitted to a graduate school."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province in 1982, Bonnie Bo was born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province. Both parents work in scientific research institutions. ... In the year of the college entrance examination, Bo Bonnie lived up to the expectations of her parents and was admitted to the Nanjing University of the Arts with a high score in the province's art category. ... In 2006, after four years of audition and study, Bonnie Bo was successfully admitted to the Literature Department of Beijing Film Academy to study for postgraduate studies. ... In March 2008, Bonnie Bo suddenly received a call from the "Dream of Red Mansions" preparatory team, inviting her and 8 other young screenwriters to write the script for the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions"."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bai Bonnie, born in 1982, is a Capricorn. Her ancestral home is Wuxi, Sichuan, and she grew up in Jiangsu. In the year of the college entrance examination, she was admitted to the Nanjing Art Institute with the top score in the province's art category. After being a weird student for a year, she decided to drop out and become an auditor at the Beijing Film Academy. The year she came to Beijing, she started writing online and never stopped. The collection of essays "Love You Like Bonnie" and the interview records "Untrue" and "Not Beautiful" are her masterpieces. Her latest work "Meeting Good" was released last year. Her screenwriting works include "Dream of Red Mansions", "Mulan", "Liao Zhai Qingfeng", etc., and her recent screenwriting work is the Korean movie "Bad Sister: Breaking Up the Marriage Alliance". This movie was rated 4.5 on Douban and made Bonnie "collapse" for a month.""
From Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#China Daily:Xinhua News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China. There is consensus that Xinhua is generally reliable for factual reporting except in areas where the government of China may have a reason to use it for propaganda or disinformation. Xinhua is also generally reliable for the views and positions of the Chinese government and its officials. For subjects where the Chinese government may be a stakeholder, the consensus is almost unanimous that Xinhua cannot be trusted to cover them accurately and dispassionately; some editors favour outright deprecation because of its lack of editorial independence. There is no consensus for applying any one single label to the whole of the agency. Caution should be exercised in using this source, extremely so in case of extraordinary claims on controversial subjects or biographies of living people. When in doubt, try to find better sources instead; use inline attribution if you must use Xinhua.
I consider the state-owned media publications listed here to be sufficiently reliable and independent for factual areas since the author and screenwriter Bonnie Bo is not an "are[a] where the government of China may have a reason to use it for propaganda or disinformation".China Daily is a publication owned by the Chinese Communist Party. The 2021 RfC found narrow consensus against deprecating China Daily, owing to the lack of available usable sources for Chinese topics. There is consensus that China Daily may be used, cautiously and with good editorial judgment, as a source for the position of the Chinese authorities and the Chinese Communist Party; as a source for the position of China Daily itself; as a source for facts about non-political events in mainland China, while noting that (a) China Daily's interpretation of those facts is likely to contain political spin, and (b) China Daily's omission of details from a story should not be used to determine that such details are untruthful; and, with great caution, as a supplementary (but not sole) source for facts about political events of mainland China. Editors agree that when using this source, context matters a great deal and the facts should be separated from China Daily's view about those facts. It is best practice to use in-text attribution and inline citations when sourcing content to China Daily.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
PROD was removed by a cut-and-paste job from the original creator, very weird in general, seems wholly extemporaneous and non-encyclopedic, never mind potentially notable. Remsense 诉 22:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
None of the sources cited seem reliable with the sole possible exception of My Republica, which seems passing, and Khabar Hub, whose stated fact-checking and correction policies do not inspire confidence; does not establish notability. Remsense 诉 22:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The book clearly does not meet WP:NBOOK and there are zero secondary sources about it. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Only non-primary sources are two books—one self-published, one ghostwritten. Remsense 诉 22:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Podium. Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The article does not go beyond a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT. The article is poorly written and sourced. The concept of podiuming does not strike me as meeting criteria of notability. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This page was previously deleted in 2018 through the AFD process, but was recreated in 2021. However, it appears that the subject of the article still lacks notability on their own, as the positions mentioned in the infobox and lead are not considered notable. Additionally, the article violates Wikipedia's policy on WP:NPOV, and it's important to note that notability is not inherited. Saqib ( talk) 20:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason I mentioned below:
Nominated this one of the many low quality article (from the article creator) since I have no choice to, considering this has been reverted twice without the reverter explaining why.
I've first proposed to merge this to Volkswagen-Audi V8 engine as they are the same as the production engines. Well, the numbers suggest that they are, not as 'prototype' as the article creator claimed. Since it sat unaddressed, I made the decision to merge, this got reverted because I forgot to add the editing summary. I redid this, which again got reverted. These articles are nothing but written stats without asserting notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only one article here is nominated. This is not how a bundled nomination is formatted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Sources are basically self-sourced, no longer work with the domain being sold and excluded from Wayback ( [13], or newspapers with only a date and no other information. I've searched and can find very little from reliable sources, although his real name did come up a couple of times but just with mentions that he was doing something somewhere. Palta isn't notable and the source doesn't say he's on the board. Not menioned in Shaolin kung fu. Since its creation by "Shaolininfo" it's been edited mainly by Swiss IPs, the latest emailing me to ask why I deleted her edits and saying that "I am the assistant of Master Shi Xing Mi (Walter Gjergja) ". Doug Weller talk 15:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
— 178.197.176.161 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 178.197.176.73 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
— 178.197.185.240 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 212.31.113.3 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Papaursa ( talk) 18:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries#Results. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't add anything that isn't at 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries#Results already. Only sourcing is an overview of all North Carolina elections, a FOX News local station, a Facebook post, and two X (Twitter) posts. A search doesn't yield anything significant for the Libertarian primary for North Carolina. reppop talk 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
*:You are wrong when saying “ No content not covered at existing main article.”. There is a full list of candidates on the ballots, in depth writing about write-in campaigns, and a map of the counties and their winners. And this party is the 3rd most popular party in the USA, and has many Members from each state, and has qualified for primaries in many states. All political parties are equal, mate. Don’t discriminate.
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk) 21:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)—
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet of
LordBirdWord)
*:Keep: This article has a lot more information that the Genaral election page. If there’s not enough references, how can you help? Add more references! I see a ton I will add! Or, I’ll just contact Mr. LordBirdWord and he can do it. But this is a well made article. I’ve fact checked it, and everything it says is true!
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk) 21:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)—
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet of
LordBirdWord)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I don't want to be accused of deleting the soul of the U.S. but my job is to assess consensus and the consensus here is that these sources are insufficient to establish GNG and this article should be Deleted. If you'd like to work on it in Draft space, let me know or contact the good folks at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Mayor of a small city, does not meet the criteria at WP:NPOL. Sourcing is purely routine local media coverage. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]"
and C1 of WP:BASIC "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.[7]"
Here are the Boston Globe articles
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/22/metro/one-governor-mckees-top-supporters-is-wavering/
Here's a mention in the New York Times the USA's newspaper of national record https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/us/elections/results-rhode-island-mayor-johnston.html
Here's a mention in the Seattle Times
The US National newspaper Washington Examiner covered his Christopher Columbus statue that he bequeathed to the good people of Johnston which not only reminded them of one of the first Europeans to stumble across America but it also reminded America of The Telltale Head which is one of the best Simpsons episodes in the history of The Simpsons. The statue saga also appeared in another national newspaper;
I could go on and on about how this subject meets WP:NPOL and WP:BASIC but the bottom line is if you delete this page from Wikipedia you would be deleting the United States of America's soul. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 11:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see some assessment about the sources presented in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Idol (franchise)#International versions. Owen× ☎ 23:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the necessity of this page considering Idol_(franchise)#International_versions does the same function and one already has a hatnote for the other. I suggest a redirect to the page mentioned, Idol_(franchise)#International_versions. Spinixster (chat!) 14:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 18:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Draft that was declined and eventually deleted. User requested undeletion to improve it and instead simply removed the decline notice and moved the draft to articlespace. Fails WP:NBIO. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk) 20:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth coverage to be found. Played T20Is for Pakistan but in a tournament in which the top sides fielded development squads. Bs1jac ( talk) 20:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Notability concerns - specifically, I wasn't able to find additional sources for Hartzell besides those already listed: her obituary (hosted on Legacy.com) and a passing mention on a US Coast Guard page. Furthermore, she doesn't seem to have a strong claim to notability, although I'll admit I'm not knowledgable about the Coast Guard to say this for sure. ForsythiaJo ( talk) 19:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Macquarie Fields railway station. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Of the seven sources in the article, six are internal documents (non-independent). The remaining source may or may not have significant coverage to the station - currently it is only used to cite two dates - but it alone does not meet GNG. Newspaper, book, and web searches reveal nothing. Given the short lifetime and not-publicly-advertised nature of the station, I suspect there is simply very little information to be had. A redirect to a few sentences at Macquarie Fields railway station or Main Southern railway line, New South Wales would be reasonable. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Karl-Marx-Allee. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable. The most I've been able to find, which isn't much, is this really short description in a German newspaper from 1991. Note that the film also seems to be spelled as "Stalinallee". The director does not have an article, so that's not a redirect option; the article could be redirected to Karl-Marx-Allee. toweli ( talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth coverage to be found. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn following the improvements of the article. Commendable job by DareshMohan. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 16:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any third-party source. Fails WP:NFILM. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The page does not qualify under CSD:G11, so the question of "spam" is moot. Same goes for whether the article exists on other wikis. In the end, the only relevant question is whether there is significant coverage about the subject that establishes notability. And this question has not been satisfactorily answered, despite the urging of a relisting admin. Owen× ☎ 23:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Spam. After the article of Claudia Letizia in Italian Wikipedia has been deleted, the author of the Italian article created articles of Claudia Letizia on 30+ Wikipedias. @ Giammarco Ferrari: Please explain the detailed situation if you can. San mo sa Outdia 00:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
My main point is 'spam', not 'notability'; then
Even if you have the sources, if you write it like a spam, it is a spam., your mention of G11 (whose template documentation states "it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic") etc.. Now which is it? Spam or not spam? If you say the page was created as a spam, then, you are implying the creator did it with the intent to spam and, I'm sorry, but it is a serious accusation, especially when it concerns a very experienced user. Or did you mean that it is an "involuntary spam"? Then that is not a spam and please choose another wording ("it has a promotional tone"), another rationale ("does not meet criteria for notability of people"), etc. Anyway, as I said multiple times, I think Letizia meets GNG. Kindly allow other users to express their views, thank you.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm told, being on the Italian Big Brother is enough for that WikipediaThat is not correct. It just means that WP:A7 does not apply and so speedy deletion is not supported. It does not mean that notability is met. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
"Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article.'). My main point is 'spam', not 'notability', I hope that you can understand this. San mo sa Outdia 05:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I have proven that they are trivial already.....hmmm....no, not at all....how could you have done so? You've quoted a sentence from the article and commented on it in a way I did not even understand. I am NOT going to copy-paste here the tons of text in Italian about her from the sources; please open the links; this is beginning to be ridiculous. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC) (NB- I removed the end of the sentence you quoted (for information, in case other users want to check)).
Mushy Yank has on several occasions, as he recalled, rejected the request: several, no, only the two I mentioned myself above. If CSDs on other Wikipedias (Romanian, for instance) have been declined that was by other users;
and on other occasions, such as the Spanish Wikipedia, voted against deletion being discussedNo. Plural is inaccurate. Only on the one I have myself mentioned, in Spanish, indeed. And I had indeed clearly said that myself so that you repeating it was not exactly necessary, especially if you present the facts inaccurately. Thank you. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This is not a productive discussion. Making accusations, trying to define what is or isn't spam doesn't help us come to a decision on what to do with this article and the longer this AFD gets, the lower the chance that other editors will want to come and participate in it. This is not the correct forum to make comments on user behavior, either here and on othe Wikipedias, even less so.
Thank you, I will add Here some info about the TV movies:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 14:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of 19th-century Major League Baseball players with unidentified given names. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 15:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't sure how/where to propose this. It shouldn't be deleted but probably made into a redirect to the List of 19th-century Major League Baseball players with unidentified given names. Until recently, this player was misidentified as "Tom Smith," hence his having a standalone article and not being on the aforementioned list from the get-go. But now that he's been reidentified, the baseball historical authorities have removed all of his misattributed biographical data. This player is different from all of the other players on that list, however, because we have the initial of his first name. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 14:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea Twenty20 International cricketers. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 18:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet
WP:NCRICK, as PNG is not a
test-playing nation. Does not meet
WP:GNG, the most significant coverage I can find is a brief mention in a match writeup: Tony Ura and Hila Vare (18) brought some much-needed stability to PNG innings, sharing a 47-run stand before Vare was caught leg-before by Kushal Bhurtel in 11.5 overs.
(
[18]). I was not able to find any biographical coverage of the subject online. signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator is advised to spend some time looking for sources before nominating an article for an AFD discussion to avoid these kinds of closures. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Has only one source. Not close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Was a WP:BEFORE done here? Liz Read! Talk! 19:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article does not have secondary sources as tagged for quite sometime now not meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator is reminded to do a WP:BEFORE preceeding an AFD nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Almost no sources, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This article has only one reference not meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Only one source, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article has been tagged as being reliant on primary sources for 12 years now, yet there have been no changes. Doesn't pass WP:GNG to me. Asked it on the Teahouse as these Roman folks get away with it on the basis of being 2000 years old, but modern people never do no matter how notable they are as long as they don't pass GNG like this article here. Hence it is important to maintain consistency. Serrwinner ( talk) 12:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Sprawling list of broadcasters that is mostly unreferenced. Of the sources: most of the sources are news announcments about securing rights, four of those are primary sources. WP:NOTGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. This article seems like excessive information that is not encyclopedic for Wikipedia. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 12:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Even WP:NBASIC is mostly impossible. As such, non-notable pastor. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 12:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
While there are some references, they are pretty poor - manuals and passing mentions, and the article's style is not very encyclopedic - this reads more like a how-to guide (obsolete at that). This topic has a very dubious notability. Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?). PS. Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES. Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Only an IMDb link on the page, de.wiki doesn't appear to offer RS which would meet the notability standards here. I don't speak German but I'm not seeing much which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 10:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Not to be confused with the Romanian former vice-president of Steaua who died in 2020 at the age of 47. The Moldovan footballer's article is cited only to database sources and my own searches yielded IPN, Moldova Sports and FMF, none of which are examples of WP:SIGCOV. PROD was contested in 2014 due to the subject playing a few games in the Moldovan league. WP:SPORTBASIC now supersedes that. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The list is OR. At best, it duplicates existing lists. Of the conflicts listed, only in one was the Ukrainian state a party. The list includes the Cossack uprisings among the Polish-Ukrainian conflicts, which were mostly an internal PLC dispute. Marcelus ( talk) 12:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is essentially a POV fork of private spaceflight. First, the title is misleading, as Elon Musk does not have an interest to go to space himself. Second, this article assumes that there is a rivalry between Blue Origin, SpaceX, and Virgin Galactic, but SpaceX primarily work on orbital spaceflight while Blue Origina and Virgin Galactic primarily work on suborbital spaceflight. These are two very different domains of spaceflight and there is strong consensus among spaceflight industry observers that SpaceX has already "won" the race or such the race does not even exist. In my opinion, if this article is not deleted, content in this article should at the very least be rewritten to remove POV bias. CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 11:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of generation I Pokémon#Lapras. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a huge slow-burn edit war going on in this page, largely because people are interpreting the prematurely withdrawn earlier AfD as a de facto keep. The older AfD was withdrawn inappropriately, since it was a WP:SUPERVOTE by nominator despite half the votes calling for a redirect. After checking the sources, I am heavily under the belief that Lapras is non-notable fancruft. Any major coverage is related to Lapras becoming a regional mascot, a publicity stunt that also applies to numerous other Pokemon. WP:NOTPROMO. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 10:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Played at youth level for Myanmar but I can't find any WP:SIGCOV or even enough for WP:SPORTBASIC #5. I found Duwun, which was the best Burmese coverage in my searches. English-language coverage was limited to trivial mentions in ASEAN Football, FAS and Jakarta Globe. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST, almost exclusively unsourced list of non-notable mayors of fairly small city. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
A short-serving mayor of a fairly small city. Fails WP:NPOL as not being a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage". Coverage almost exclusively related to two incidents, one in which she accused another politician of swearing at her, another in which her husband was arrested in a domestic incident. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A third relist would be redundant as we only have one vote, posted two weeks ago, apart from the nominator. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG.-- فيصل ( talk) 16:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The movie's content is troubling yet that is not a reason to delete. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Absolutely no notability or significance; article is written as an advertisement in favor of a pedophilic film, which this article seems to strangely justify. Article has only 2 citations, and no objective or reliable sources other than 2 opinion reviews. No other sources related to this film exist. DocZach ( talk) 07:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
UPDATE: I RETRACT MY NOMINATION DocZach ( talk) 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This article covers a combination of different topics, none of which warrant their own article. The article reads like a news report and isn't properly cited. There's a quotation about "reliable internet providers", but the source itself has nothing to do with internet providers or startups. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 02:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Citations taken are from credible sources. This is an important issue, more so from the perspective of an Indian Wikipedia reader, and if there are any shortcomings, I feel the page could be improved, rather than censor the same.
Fredericknoronha (
talk) 03:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be helpful to get an assessment on content added to the article since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion under WP: NOTDIRECTORY. The article consists almost entirely of a list of companies that have offices in the complex. The only source about the complex I could find was this, which isn't nearly enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 03:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Entirely based on primary sources. Level of trade is extremely low. Most of their interactions are between the EU and Myanmar rather than Spain and Myanmar. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 06:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The policy based arguments here indicate a consensus that notability of this figure is not established. There are not exceptions in our notability policies for people who may become notable in the future Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article fails notability guidelines as per WP:CREATIVE and was published by another editor after failed attempts by the subject to create a promotional autobiography. Redtree21 ( talk) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 05:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 06:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Not enough coverage for notability. There is a brief description in a book titled Effective Digital Learning Environments [33], as part of a list of random educational websites, and other than that I could only find very brief mentions, mostly in the context of Alan Alda. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn; forgot to search Google Books (non-admin closure) Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 04:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage for notability purposes; the closest thing is a New Yorker article [35] that only briefly mentions the competition. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 03:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep since notability is established with the addition of new sources. Further discussions regarding the sources, if needed, can be done in the talk page (where the quotes are added from ProQuest), outside AfD. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Zero secondary sources. Does not meet WP:NORG, lacking 'significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" AusLondonder ( talk) 13:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before proposing or nominating an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a deletion discussion, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to find sources for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any.— Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 20:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for the further evaluation of sources provided.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. An assessment of sources is also needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus to delete after a month of discussion. Some notability and sources might be present and the existence of the new group is also evident from the sources. These can be incorporated into the article but currently, there is no consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Article has had zero secondary sources since creation. Struggling to find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done 18:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Tagged since 2022, appears to be an autobiography created by a SPA on both trwiki and here. Also tagged there. Fails WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Tehonk ( talk) 01:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Participants here don't seem to think TNT is called for. Article can be improved through editing, not deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
A very similar case to the about-to-be-deleted mess that is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia negation. Mostly unreferenced OR, half of which is an unsourced list of "Real-world applications and devices". The only two footnotes are for the red-linked concept of a rotary damper (perhaps it is notable and should be split and stubbed?). I'll note that the concept of "Inertia damper" does have a few hundred hits on GScholar, so there may be a real science concept to be written about here, but what we have begs for WP:TNT, IMHO. Pinging participants of the aforementioned AfD: User:Lubal, User:Xxanthippe, User:Zxcvbnm, User:Shooterwalker, User:Johnjbarton, User:Rorshacma and User:DrowssapSMM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Played in just one professional game before disappearing. Searching in Korean and Japanese, I was only able to find FC Gifu, which is not an independent source, and a bunch of database sources. I can't find anything that would meet WP:SPORTBASIC #5. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Copy of List of school districts in Oklahoma with no need to have two distinct articles when the first one already divides schools up by County. Most - if not all - other states only have one article in the form of List of school districts in XXXXXXX Epluribusunumyall ( talk) 00:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. All I can find are trivial mentions in TUDN and SN Digital. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No coverage in reliable sources. Remsense 诉 23:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robbie Williams discography as a sensible ATD. Owen× ☎ 00:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NALBUM and GNG. – Davey2010 Talk 23:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The individual serves as a government official within a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The primary references in the article primarily revolve around his regional responsibilities and engagements, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Alternatively, some references focus on his familial relations, which do not contribute to the notability of the article per WP:INVALIDBIO. Ckfasdf ( talk) 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah binti Ahmad.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Malformed nomination. Article has been sent to draftspace due to lack of sources. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Reason Egezort ( talk) 22:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable. Thoroughly unconfirmable in all regards. Only one valid link which is remotely intelligible and it is a fluff interview. Claims she participated in Chinese filmmaking are debunked by a complete absence of any presence on IMDb. Nirva20 ( talk) 22:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes from Google Translate: "The name Bo Bonnie may be familiar to many Nanjing netizens, because when Xici Hutong was popular for a while, Bo Bonnie "has been haunted" in many movie music and literary editions, and she has also built her own discussion section. At that time, she was still in college. She was born in 1982 and is from Lianyungang. After graduating from high school, she was admitted to the film and television department of Nanjing University of the Arts, but after more than a year, she went to the Beijing Film Academy as an auditor. After that, she has experience in media work, column writing, and book publishing, and gradually clarified her writing direction. A few years ago, she was admitted to the Beijing Film Academy for a master's degree and systematically studied screenwriting."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bo is a legend. She once attracted much attention for being the top student in the college entrance examination who dropped out of school. She also became popular on the Internet because of "A Letter to My Sister"; she was affectionately called "the first in the West Temple" by netizens. Talented Girl", also participated in the screenwriting work of the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions" as the main force of "Youth Dream Team". After graduating from Beijing Film Academy with Zhao Wei [microblogging], she switched back and forth between the two professions of writer and screenwriter, non-stop. She is a post-80s female screenwriter and a leading figure in the new generation of writers."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Zhang Shanshan, who left Nanjing University of the Arts and went north, gave herself a new name called Bo Bonnie. ... In the summer of 2002, Zhang Shanshan, a former top student in the college entrance examination for arts in Jiangsu Province, chose to drop out; in 2007, Bo Bonnie, an auditor of the Beijing Film Academy, was admitted to the graduate school of the Beijing Film Academy and became Zhao Wei's classmate. ... This spring, Bonnie Bo was invited to Japan to interview female photographer Ninagawa Mika."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bonnie Bai, whose name comes from the 1960s Hollywood love movie "Bonnie and Clyde", is the Bonnie who "looked at each other and smiled with Clyde, shot 167 times in the sun, fell to the ground and died". She fled from a university that "couldn't see her ideal", went to Beiying as an auditor, and was admitted to a graduate school."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province in 1982, Bonnie Bo was born in Lianyungang City, Jiangsu Province. Both parents work in scientific research institutions. ... In the year of the college entrance examination, Bo Bonnie lived up to the expectations of her parents and was admitted to the Nanjing University of the Arts with a high score in the province's art category. ... In 2006, after four years of audition and study, Bonnie Bo was successfully admitted to the Literature Department of Beijing Film Academy to study for postgraduate studies. ... In March 2008, Bonnie Bo suddenly received a call from the "Dream of Red Mansions" preparatory team, inviting her and 8 other young screenwriters to write the script for the new version of "Dream of Red Mansions"."
The article notes from Google Translate: "Bai Bonnie, born in 1982, is a Capricorn. Her ancestral home is Wuxi, Sichuan, and she grew up in Jiangsu. In the year of the college entrance examination, she was admitted to the Nanjing Art Institute with the top score in the province's art category. After being a weird student for a year, she decided to drop out and become an auditor at the Beijing Film Academy. The year she came to Beijing, she started writing online and never stopped. The collection of essays "Love You Like Bonnie" and the interview records "Untrue" and "Not Beautiful" are her masterpieces. Her latest work "Meeting Good" was released last year. Her screenwriting works include "Dream of Red Mansions", "Mulan", "Liao Zhai Qingfeng", etc., and her recent screenwriting work is the Korean movie "Bad Sister: Breaking Up the Marriage Alliance". This movie was rated 4.5 on Douban and made Bonnie "collapse" for a month.""
From Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#China Daily:Xinhua News Agency is the official state-run press agency of the People's Republic of China. There is consensus that Xinhua is generally reliable for factual reporting except in areas where the government of China may have a reason to use it for propaganda or disinformation. Xinhua is also generally reliable for the views and positions of the Chinese government and its officials. For subjects where the Chinese government may be a stakeholder, the consensus is almost unanimous that Xinhua cannot be trusted to cover them accurately and dispassionately; some editors favour outright deprecation because of its lack of editorial independence. There is no consensus for applying any one single label to the whole of the agency. Caution should be exercised in using this source, extremely so in case of extraordinary claims on controversial subjects or biographies of living people. When in doubt, try to find better sources instead; use inline attribution if you must use Xinhua.
I consider the state-owned media publications listed here to be sufficiently reliable and independent for factual areas since the author and screenwriter Bonnie Bo is not an "are[a] where the government of China may have a reason to use it for propaganda or disinformation".China Daily is a publication owned by the Chinese Communist Party. The 2021 RfC found narrow consensus against deprecating China Daily, owing to the lack of available usable sources for Chinese topics. There is consensus that China Daily may be used, cautiously and with good editorial judgment, as a source for the position of the Chinese authorities and the Chinese Communist Party; as a source for the position of China Daily itself; as a source for facts about non-political events in mainland China, while noting that (a) China Daily's interpretation of those facts is likely to contain political spin, and (b) China Daily's omission of details from a story should not be used to determine that such details are untruthful; and, with great caution, as a supplementary (but not sole) source for facts about political events of mainland China. Editors agree that when using this source, context matters a great deal and the facts should be separated from China Daily's view about those facts. It is best practice to use in-text attribution and inline citations when sourcing content to China Daily.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
PROD was removed by a cut-and-paste job from the original creator, very weird in general, seems wholly extemporaneous and non-encyclopedic, never mind potentially notable. Remsense 诉 22:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
None of the sources cited seem reliable with the sole possible exception of My Republica, which seems passing, and Khabar Hub, whose stated fact-checking and correction policies do not inspire confidence; does not establish notability. Remsense 诉 22:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The book clearly does not meet WP:NBOOK and there are zero secondary sources about it. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Only non-primary sources are two books—one self-published, one ghostwritten. Remsense 诉 22:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Podium. Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The article does not go beyond a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT. The article is poorly written and sourced. The concept of podiuming does not strike me as meeting criteria of notability. Ruud Buitelaar ( talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This page was previously deleted in 2018 through the AFD process, but was recreated in 2021. However, it appears that the subject of the article still lacks notability on their own, as the positions mentioned in the infobox and lead are not considered notable. Additionally, the article violates Wikipedia's policy on WP:NPOV, and it's important to note that notability is not inherited. Saqib ( talk) 20:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason I mentioned below:
Nominated this one of the many low quality article (from the article creator) since I have no choice to, considering this has been reverted twice without the reverter explaining why.
I've first proposed to merge this to Volkswagen-Audi V8 engine as they are the same as the production engines. Well, the numbers suggest that they are, not as 'prototype' as the article creator claimed. Since it sat unaddressed, I made the decision to merge, this got reverted because I forgot to add the editing summary. I redid this, which again got reverted. These articles are nothing but written stats without asserting notability. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only one article here is nominated. This is not how a bundled nomination is formatted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 23:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Sources are basically self-sourced, no longer work with the domain being sold and excluded from Wayback ( [13], or newspapers with only a date and no other information. I've searched and can find very little from reliable sources, although his real name did come up a couple of times but just with mentions that he was doing something somewhere. Palta isn't notable and the source doesn't say he's on the board. Not menioned in Shaolin kung fu. Since its creation by "Shaolininfo" it's been edited mainly by Swiss IPs, the latest emailing me to ask why I deleted her edits and saying that "I am the assistant of Master Shi Xing Mi (Walter Gjergja) ". Doug Weller talk 15:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
— 178.197.176.161 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 178.197.176.73 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
— 178.197.185.240 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 212.31.113.3 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Papaursa ( talk) 18:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries#Results. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't add anything that isn't at 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries#Results already. Only sourcing is an overview of all North Carolina elections, a FOX News local station, a Facebook post, and two X (Twitter) posts. A search doesn't yield anything significant for the Libertarian primary for North Carolina. reppop talk 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
*:You are wrong when saying “ No content not covered at existing main article.”. There is a full list of candidates on the ballots, in depth writing about write-in campaigns, and a map of the counties and their winners. And this party is the 3rd most popular party in the USA, and has many Members from each state, and has qualified for primaries in many states. All political parties are equal, mate. Don’t discriminate.
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk) 21:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)—
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet of
LordBirdWord)
*:Keep: This article has a lot more information that the Genaral election page. If there’s not enough references, how can you help? Add more references! I see a ton I will add! Or, I’ll just contact Mr. LordBirdWord and he can do it. But this is a well made article. I’ve fact checked it, and everything it says is true!
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk) 21:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)—
GeorgeNotFound23 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. ( Blocked
sockpuppet of
LordBirdWord)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I don't want to be accused of deleting the soul of the U.S. but my job is to assess consensus and the consensus here is that these sources are insufficient to establish GNG and this article should be Deleted. If you'd like to work on it in Draft space, let me know or contact the good folks at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Mayor of a small city, does not meet the criteria at WP:NPOL. Sourcing is purely routine local media coverage. AusLondonder ( talk) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
"People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]"
and C1 of WP:BASIC "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.[7]"
Here are the Boston Globe articles
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/04/22/metro/one-governor-mckees-top-supporters-is-wavering/
Here's a mention in the New York Times the USA's newspaper of national record https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/11/08/us/elections/results-rhode-island-mayor-johnston.html
Here's a mention in the Seattle Times
The US National newspaper Washington Examiner covered his Christopher Columbus statue that he bequeathed to the good people of Johnston which not only reminded them of one of the first Europeans to stumble across America but it also reminded America of The Telltale Head which is one of the best Simpsons episodes in the history of The Simpsons. The statue saga also appeared in another national newspaper;
I could go on and on about how this subject meets WP:NPOL and WP:BASIC but the bottom line is if you delete this page from Wikipedia you would be deleting the United States of America's soul. 𝔓420° 𝔓Holla 11:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to see some assessment about the sources presented in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Idol (franchise)#International versions. Owen× ☎ 23:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not see the necessity of this page considering Idol_(franchise)#International_versions does the same function and one already has a hatnote for the other. I suggest a redirect to the page mentioned, Idol_(franchise)#International_versions. Spinixster (chat!) 14:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 18:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Draft that was declined and eventually deleted. User requested undeletion to improve it and instead simply removed the decline notice and moved the draft to articlespace. Fails WP:NBIO. ThaddeusSholto ( talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Tom Morris (
talk) 20:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth coverage to be found. Played T20Is for Pakistan but in a tournament in which the top sides fielded development squads. Bs1jac ( talk) 20:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Notability concerns - specifically, I wasn't able to find additional sources for Hartzell besides those already listed: her obituary (hosted on Legacy.com) and a passing mention on a US Coast Guard page. Furthermore, she doesn't seem to have a strong claim to notability, although I'll admit I'm not knowledgable about the Coast Guard to say this for sure. ForsythiaJo ( talk) 19:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Macquarie Fields railway station. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Of the seven sources in the article, six are internal documents (non-independent). The remaining source may or may not have significant coverage to the station - currently it is only used to cite two dates - but it alone does not meet GNG. Newspaper, book, and web searches reveal nothing. Given the short lifetime and not-publicly-advertised nature of the station, I suspect there is simply very little information to be had. A redirect to a few sentences at Macquarie Fields railway station or Main Southern railway line, New South Wales would be reasonable. Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Karl-Marx-Allee. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be notable. The most I've been able to find, which isn't much, is this really short description in a German newspaper from 1991. Note that the film also seems to be spelled as "Stalinallee". The director does not have an article, so that's not a redirect option; the article could be redirected to Karl-Marx-Allee. toweli ( talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. No in-depth coverage to be found. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn following the improvements of the article. Commendable job by DareshMohan. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 16:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Can't find any third-party source. Fails WP:NFILM. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The page does not qualify under CSD:G11, so the question of "spam" is moot. Same goes for whether the article exists on other wikis. In the end, the only relevant question is whether there is significant coverage about the subject that establishes notability. And this question has not been satisfactorily answered, despite the urging of a relisting admin. Owen× ☎ 23:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Spam. After the article of Claudia Letizia in Italian Wikipedia has been deleted, the author of the Italian article created articles of Claudia Letizia on 30+ Wikipedias. @ Giammarco Ferrari: Please explain the detailed situation if you can. San mo sa Outdia 00:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
My main point is 'spam', not 'notability'; then
Even if you have the sources, if you write it like a spam, it is a spam., your mention of G11 (whose template documentation states "it serves only to promote or publicise an entity, person, product, or idea, and would require a fundamental rewrite in order to become encyclopedic") etc.. Now which is it? Spam or not spam? If you say the page was created as a spam, then, you are implying the creator did it with the intent to spam and, I'm sorry, but it is a serious accusation, especially when it concerns a very experienced user. Or did you mean that it is an "involuntary spam"? Then that is not a spam and please choose another wording ("it has a promotional tone"), another rationale ("does not meet criteria for notability of people"), etc. Anyway, as I said multiple times, I think Letizia meets GNG. Kindly allow other users to express their views, thank you.- My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm told, being on the Italian Big Brother is enough for that WikipediaThat is not correct. It just means that WP:A7 does not apply and so speedy deletion is not supported. It does not mean that notability is met. -- Whpq ( talk) 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
"Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article.'). My main point is 'spam', not 'notability', I hope that you can understand this. San mo sa Outdia 05:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I have proven that they are trivial already.....hmmm....no, not at all....how could you have done so? You've quoted a sentence from the article and commented on it in a way I did not even understand. I am NOT going to copy-paste here the tons of text in Italian about her from the sources; please open the links; this is beginning to be ridiculous. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC) (NB- I removed the end of the sentence you quoted (for information, in case other users want to check)).
Mushy Yank has on several occasions, as he recalled, rejected the request: several, no, only the two I mentioned myself above. If CSDs on other Wikipedias (Romanian, for instance) have been declined that was by other users;
and on other occasions, such as the Spanish Wikipedia, voted against deletion being discussedNo. Plural is inaccurate. Only on the one I have myself mentioned, in Spanish, indeed. And I had indeed clearly said that myself so that you repeating it was not exactly necessary, especially if you present the facts inaccurately. Thank you. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. This is not a productive discussion. Making accusations, trying to define what is or isn't spam doesn't help us come to a decision on what to do with this article and the longer this AFD gets, the lower the chance that other editors will want to come and participate in it. This is not the correct forum to make comments on user behavior, either here and on othe Wikipedias, even less so.
Thank you, I will add Here some info about the TV movies:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 14:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of 19th-century Major League Baseball players with unidentified given names. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 15:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't sure how/where to propose this. It shouldn't be deleted but probably made into a redirect to the List of 19th-century Major League Baseball players with unidentified given names. Until recently, this player was misidentified as "Tom Smith," hence his having a standalone article and not being on the aforementioned list from the get-go. But now that he's been reidentified, the baseball historical authorities have removed all of his misattributed biographical data. This player is different from all of the other players on that list, however, because we have the initial of his first name. Dennis C. Abrams ( talk) 14:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Papua New Guinea Twenty20 International cricketers. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 18:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet
WP:NCRICK, as PNG is not a
test-playing nation. Does not meet
WP:GNG, the most significant coverage I can find is a brief mention in a match writeup: Tony Ura and Hila Vare (18) brought some much-needed stability to PNG innings, sharing a 47-run stand before Vare was caught leg-before by Kushal Bhurtel in 11.5 overs.
(
[18]). I was not able to find any biographical coverage of the subject online. signed,
Rosguill
talk 14:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nominator is advised to spend some time looking for sources before nominating an article for an AFD discussion to avoid these kinds of closures. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Has only one source. Not close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Was a WP:BEFORE done here? Liz Read! Talk! 19:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article does not have secondary sources as tagged for quite sometime now not meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator is reminded to do a WP:BEFORE preceeding an AFD nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Almost no sources, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This article has only one reference not meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Only one source, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner ( talk) 13:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The article has been tagged as being reliant on primary sources for 12 years now, yet there have been no changes. Doesn't pass WP:GNG to me. Asked it on the Teahouse as these Roman folks get away with it on the basis of being 2000 years old, but modern people never do no matter how notable they are as long as they don't pass GNG like this article here. Hence it is important to maintain consistency. Serrwinner ( talk) 12:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Sprawling list of broadcasters that is mostly unreferenced. Of the sources: most of the sources are news announcments about securing rights, four of those are primary sources. WP:NOTGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. This article seems like excessive information that is not encyclopedic for Wikipedia. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 12:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Even WP:NBASIC is mostly impossible. As such, non-notable pastor. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 12:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
While there are some references, they are pretty poor - manuals and passing mentions, and the article's style is not very encyclopedic - this reads more like a how-to guide (obsolete at that). This topic has a very dubious notability. Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?). PS. Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES. Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Only an IMDb link on the page, de.wiki doesn't appear to offer RS which would meet the notability standards here. I don't speak German but I'm not seeing much which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 10:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Not to be confused with the Romanian former vice-president of Steaua who died in 2020 at the age of 47. The Moldovan footballer's article is cited only to database sources and my own searches yielded IPN, Moldova Sports and FMF, none of which are examples of WP:SIGCOV. PROD was contested in 2014 due to the subject playing a few games in the Moldovan league. WP:SPORTBASIC now supersedes that. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The list is OR. At best, it duplicates existing lists. Of the conflicts listed, only in one was the Ukrainian state a party. The list includes the Cossack uprisings among the Polish-Ukrainian conflicts, which were mostly an internal PLC dispute. Marcelus ( talk) 12:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article is essentially a POV fork of private spaceflight. First, the title is misleading, as Elon Musk does not have an interest to go to space himself. Second, this article assumes that there is a rivalry between Blue Origin, SpaceX, and Virgin Galactic, but SpaceX primarily work on orbital spaceflight while Blue Origina and Virgin Galactic primarily work on suborbital spaceflight. These are two very different domains of spaceflight and there is strong consensus among spaceflight industry observers that SpaceX has already "won" the race or such the race does not even exist. In my opinion, if this article is not deleted, content in this article should at the very least be rewritten to remove POV bias. CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 11:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of generation I Pokémon#Lapras. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
There is a huge slow-burn edit war going on in this page, largely because people are interpreting the prematurely withdrawn earlier AfD as a de facto keep. The older AfD was withdrawn inappropriately, since it was a WP:SUPERVOTE by nominator despite half the votes calling for a redirect. After checking the sources, I am heavily under the belief that Lapras is non-notable fancruft. Any major coverage is related to Lapras becoming a regional mascot, a publicity stunt that also applies to numerous other Pokemon. WP:NOTPROMO. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 10:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Played at youth level for Myanmar but I can't find any WP:SIGCOV or even enough for WP:SPORTBASIC #5. I found Duwun, which was the best Burmese coverage in my searches. English-language coverage was limited to trivial mentions in ASEAN Football, FAS and Jakarta Globe. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST, almost exclusively unsourced list of non-notable mayors of fairly small city. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
A short-serving mayor of a fairly small city. Fails WP:NPOL as not being a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage". Coverage almost exclusively related to two incidents, one in which she accused another politician of swearing at her, another in which her husband was arrested in a domestic incident. AusLondonder ( talk) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A third relist would be redundant as we only have one vote, posted two weeks ago, apart from the nominator. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 11:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG.-- فيصل ( talk) 16:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 08:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The movie's content is troubling yet that is not a reason to delete. (non-admin closure) gidonb ( talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Absolutely no notability or significance; article is written as an advertisement in favor of a pedophilic film, which this article seems to strangely justify. Article has only 2 citations, and no objective or reliable sources other than 2 opinion reviews. No other sources related to this film exist. DocZach ( talk) 07:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
UPDATE: I RETRACT MY NOMINATION DocZach ( talk) 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This article covers a combination of different topics, none of which warrant their own article. The article reads like a news report and isn't properly cited. There's a quotation about "reliable internet providers", but the source itself has nothing to do with internet providers or startups. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 02:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Citations taken are from credible sources. This is an important issue, more so from the perspective of an Indian Wikipedia reader, and if there are any shortcomings, I feel the page could be improved, rather than censor the same.
Fredericknoronha (
talk) 03:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be helpful to get an assessment on content added to the article since its nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion under WP: NOTDIRECTORY. The article consists almost entirely of a list of companies that have offices in the complex. The only source about the complex I could find was this, which isn't nearly enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 03:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Draftify or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Entirely based on primary sources. Level of trade is extremely low. Most of their interactions are between the EU and Myanmar rather than Spain and Myanmar. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 06:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The policy based arguments here indicate a consensus that notability of this figure is not established. There are not exceptions in our notability policies for people who may become notable in the future Eddie891 Talk Work 17:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This article fails notability guidelines as per WP:CREATIVE and was published by another editor after failed attempts by the subject to create a promotional autobiography. Redtree21 ( talk) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 05:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 06:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Not enough coverage for notability. There is a brief description in a book titled Effective Digital Learning Environments [33], as part of a list of random educational websites, and other than that I could only find very brief mentions, mostly in the context of Alan Alda. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn; forgot to search Google Books (non-admin closure) Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 04:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find any significant coverage for notability purposes; the closest thing is a New Yorker article [35] that only briefly mentions the competition. Helpful Raccoon ( talk) 03:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep since notability is established with the addition of new sources. Further discussions regarding the sources, if needed, can be done in the talk page (where the quotes are added from ProQuest), outside AfD. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Zero secondary sources. Does not meet WP:NORG, lacking 'significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" AusLondonder ( talk) 13:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Notability requires only the existence of suitable independent, reliable sources, not their immediate presence or citation in an article. Editors evaluating notability should consider not only any sources currently named in an article, but also the possibility or existence of notability-indicating sources that are not currently named in the article. Thus, before proposing or nominating an article for deletion, or offering an opinion based on notability in a deletion discussion, editors are strongly encouraged to attempt to find sources for the subject in question and consider the possibility that sources may still exist even if their search failed to uncover any.— Grand'mere Eugene ( talk) 20:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for the further evaluation of sources provided.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. An assessment of sources is also needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No clear consensus to delete after a month of discussion. Some notability and sources might be present and the existence of the new group is also evident from the sources. These can be incorporated into the article but currently, there is no consensus. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 05:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Article has had zero secondary sources since creation. Struggling to find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Xymmax
So let it be written
So let it be done 18:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Tagged since 2022, appears to be an autobiography created by a SPA on both trwiki and here. Also tagged there. Fails WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Tehonk ( talk) 01:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Participants here don't seem to think TNT is called for. Article can be improved through editing, not deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
A very similar case to the about-to-be-deleted mess that is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia negation. Mostly unreferenced OR, half of which is an unsourced list of "Real-world applications and devices". The only two footnotes are for the red-linked concept of a rotary damper (perhaps it is notable and should be split and stubbed?). I'll note that the concept of "Inertia damper" does have a few hundred hits on GScholar, so there may be a real science concept to be written about here, but what we have begs for WP:TNT, IMHO. Pinging participants of the aforementioned AfD: User:Lubal, User:Xxanthippe, User:Zxcvbnm, User:Shooterwalker, User:Johnjbarton, User:Rorshacma and User:DrowssapSMM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Played in just one professional game before disappearing. Searching in Korean and Japanese, I was only able to find FC Gifu, which is not an independent source, and a bunch of database sources. I can't find anything that would meet WP:SPORTBASIC #5. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Copy of List of school districts in Oklahoma with no need to have two distinct articles when the first one already divides schools up by County. Most - if not all - other states only have one article in the form of List of school districts in XXXXXXX Epluribusunumyall ( talk) 00:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. All I can find are trivial mentions in TUDN and SN Digital. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)