This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Judaism. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Judaism|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Judaism.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
I wasn't arguing that it should be kept, but there are sources out there. It should just be added. But Google searching, you can find more from both of these publications for some reason not on their website. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep You have at least three things going on here: 1) Historic antisemitism at ivy league schools, which have plenty of RS'es 2) current protest events being alternatively branded as anti-Zionist or antisemitic, also covered in a lot of RS'es but as current events rather than historical reflection, and 3) commentaries connecting the two. I don't see how we can avoid covering this, even if the ultimate focus needs to be bigger than Columbia and the ultimate title needs to be different. An AfD may be a good place to start such a discussion, but I doubt it will end up resolved well here.
Jclemens (
talk) 17:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Unfortunately given what's happened, an article like this needs to exist, despite the creation by a sock.
WP:GNGMaskedSinger (
talk) 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Why was there no discussion on the talk page before it was nominated for deletion?
MaskedSinger (
talk) 05:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep by SNOW. The issue of quality may be valid, and the creation issue definitely is, but it meets GNG (whether or not some content needs to be merged somewhere else), and no reason for deletion exists.
FortunateSons (
talk) 11:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
the disambiguation does not explain how the term at all relates to the two entries. I could see canada, but a church cantoris? it just doesn't seem right.
Gaismagorm (
talk) 19:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Can. Add
Cantoris there only after adding a sourced mention of this in the target article.
PamD 11:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
OK, fell down the rabbit hole: abbreviation is now mentioned and sourced in
Cantoris. Have also rejigged the
Can dab page to separate out the two abbreviations.
PamD 12:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Judaism. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Judaism|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Note that there are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove links to other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Judaism.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
I wasn't arguing that it should be kept, but there are sources out there. It should just be added. But Google searching, you can find more from both of these publications for some reason not on their website. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 17:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep You have at least three things going on here: 1) Historic antisemitism at ivy league schools, which have plenty of RS'es 2) current protest events being alternatively branded as anti-Zionist or antisemitic, also covered in a lot of RS'es but as current events rather than historical reflection, and 3) commentaries connecting the two. I don't see how we can avoid covering this, even if the ultimate focus needs to be bigger than Columbia and the ultimate title needs to be different. An AfD may be a good place to start such a discussion, but I doubt it will end up resolved well here.
Jclemens (
talk) 17:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Unfortunately given what's happened, an article like this needs to exist, despite the creation by a sock.
WP:GNGMaskedSinger (
talk) 05:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: Why was there no discussion on the talk page before it was nominated for deletion?
MaskedSinger (
talk) 05:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep by SNOW. The issue of quality may be valid, and the creation issue definitely is, but it meets GNG (whether or not some content needs to be merged somewhere else), and no reason for deletion exists.
FortunateSons (
talk) 11:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
the disambiguation does not explain how the term at all relates to the two entries. I could see canada, but a church cantoris? it just doesn't seem right.
Gaismagorm (
talk) 19:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Can. Add
Cantoris there only after adding a sourced mention of this in the target article.
PamD 11:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply
OK, fell down the rabbit hole: abbreviation is now mentioned and sourced in
Cantoris. Have also rejigged the
Can dab page to separate out the two abbreviations.
PamD 12:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)reply