The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 09:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I could not find significant coverage searching under "Rosemarie Gillespie", "Rosemary Gillespie" and "Waratah Rose" in google news and google books. As well as Australian database trove. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof of notability, no reliable sources that back up claims. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 17:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Has been actively edited recently so do not want to close as soft-delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Those editors advocating Keep would be advised to offer some reliable sourcing that could be used in the article instead of just making claims. I think there is enough objection to this deletion proposal that Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts. I'm closing this as a Merge. I just selected a reasonable target article but information can be Merged to other articles as well that are appropriate. For those editors arguing to Keep this article, no new sources were added to the article or brought into this discussion so either there are none or no one looked for them. Feel free to edit about this incident on whichever articles the content is Merged to. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
A search for ""Pearl continental" gwadar -wikipedia" in google news shows almost all coverage from May 2019. Does not seem to have lasting coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established...a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notablesometimes interpreting whether an event is sufficiently notable can be tricky. I consider merging this into Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts is a great ATD seeing as I otherwise would not have a strong opinion either way. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have no consensus and, right now, two different Merge target articles mentioned (although a mention in each might be appropriate). I was surprised not to see this attack mentioned at
Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts which does cover another disastrous incident at one of their hotels. Editors arguing to Keep should share any sources they have found that demonstrates LASTING coverage and influence.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Valery Leontiev. Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
YouTube and the singer’s official website do not demonstrate the significance of the song. Option: redirect to Valery Leontiev.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fresh International Market. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Candidate for political office whose BLP primarily features sources about his business or about his candidacy, and his own website. Fails WP:NPOL. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't believe the subject meets GNG yet. It may be a case of TOOSOON. He has made a single substitute appearance against a non-professional team. Although he has been noted as one of the youngest players to appear for his club, I don't think he has attracted enough attention for an article yet. It could also be draftified if anyone wished to work on it further. MarchOfThe Greyhounds 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Avocado#Uses. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions that don't show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn following clarification of the article's situation ( non-admin closure). Ouro ( blah blah) 08:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Vote now changed to keep. A lot of the info here is from the company itself. Does not pass WP:CORP, very little coverage about it in general. Additionally, the article reads like an advertisement. Something it would be prudent to consider is to simply merge the article into Mochi ice cream or Mikawaya, since the brand was created after a firm acquired Mikawaya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OsmiumGuard ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Han shot first. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Entirely redundant to Han shot first, and I can't seem to find info on the character specifically. Given he's rather minor, I'd support a redirect either to the character list or to Han shot first. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No policy-based rationale for deletion. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright, page exists only to promote itself, and not an official C&C game: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30754684 https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30778227 RealAgentJ ( talk) 20:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers as I am unable to fine enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I could not find much sources during a BEFORE check other than celebrations and activities by organizations. Suggesting incorporating such content in the nonexistent Safer Internet Day as it got media interest beyond Nigeria only. Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Article about a film, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films are not all "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to meet certain specific criteria to qualify for Wikipedia articles -- noteworthy film awards, a
WP:GNG-worthy volume of third-party coverage and analysis (e.g. reviews by professional film critics, etc.) about them, and on and so forth. But the notability claim on offer here is that the film exists, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself, and the referencing is entirely to Q&A interviews in which the filmmaker is talking about her own work in the first person, with absolutely no evidence of independent third-party analysis about the film shown at all.
As it's not a film I'm personally familiar with, I'm perfectly willing to withdraw this if somebody can improve the referencing, but the filmmaker just talking up her own film in her own words doesn't get the film over the notability bar all by itself, if that's all the coverage it has and nobody without a direct personal stake in the film has independently written about or analyzed it in the third person.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
There appears to be nothing of note online about the School - other than a legal dispute in 2021 about which of two teachers should be considered senior. See https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107838062/ Newhaven lad ( talk) 18:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage. He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games. Not notable enough for an article. My Pants Metal ( talk) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting previous AFD
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Furlatt.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The delete arguments made their case. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:NPROF, and does not seem to be meeting WP:GNG. Mentions in secondary source such as Indian Express are running. Also, Chairs/Positions held are non-notable, with multiple department heads/chairs in a single university, mostly on a rotational basis. Publications are journals and chapters(as done by virtually all professors), not full books. Secretary position in said society is below president, and is organisational in nature. User4edits ( talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
highly prestigious academic award. The subject has previously served as the Secretary of the same society. User4edits ( talk) 16:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses. Do you think the two publishers, Concept Publishing and Roopa Prakasana, are vanity / fringe / non-selective? I don't know anything about them. Tacyarg ( talk) 15:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
She currently holds the Visiting Professorship of the Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Chair at the University. That means she does not hold that chair. Nonetheless, chairs are far more numerous in Indian Univs than in the US or Europe, and professors could be appointed chair by rotation or mere seniority in the department. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 13:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Passions ran high in this discussion, and strong arguments were raised by both sides. But in the end, participants could not reach a rough consensus about whether the sources establish sufficient notability to meet our guidelines. Owen× ☎ 23:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hyper-local niche family owned grocery store with mere three stores in the Portland, Oregon metro area. Fails WP:NCORP Coverages are all routine and hyper-local. Graywalls ( talk) 02:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
this screams sensationalismwouldn't be helpful. Lastly, the article creator's edit history has no bearing on the notability of the topic. Left guide ( talk) 08:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists, it also appears to be a low-quality website focused on advertising and promotion. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
independence of the author, I would think. Is there some connection between Supermarket News journalist Barbara Murray and Zupan's Markets that I don't know about? P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk) 20:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article. Regardless of editor intent, sources related to companies can tend to be promotional, and if an article is primarily built from such sources and lacks the significant coverage described in the WP:NCORP guideline, it can be excluded according to the notability guideline and WP:NOT policy. For example, this article includes several bizjournals.com sources - which is American City Business Journals, a source that describes itself as "the premier media platform for companies strategically targeting business decision-makers," so this does not appear to be the type of independent content that helps support company notability. There are also several news reports related to the death of the founder; announcements of store openings and closings and products ( examples of trivial coverage); several reports about donating food boxes (see WP:ORGTRIV); and references to various books (cited without page numbers) used to support limited content in the article. The WP:SIRS coverage needed to support a standalone article does not seem to be available at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 17:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 17:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
it doesn't help save an article to include every mention of the article subject. Quality, not quantity helps both those wanting to preserve an article and those who are advocating Delete.Beccaynr ( talk) 19:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
off-topic
|
---|
|
as a catalyst for mixed-use development in a high-poverty neighborhood, and includes the opinion of other businesses in the neighborhood, with zero commentary from Zupan's. Another piece of significant coverage that seeks to take an independent, balanced view of Zupan's Markets is the 1999 Business Journal article "Hero or villain? Zupan's blunders ignite passions"; although it includes quotes from John Zupan and his lawyer, it also includes other quotes from the Portland City Council and the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. If this is a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and you feel that only national chains like Safeway, Albertson's, Trader Joe's, and Whole Foods deserve Wikipedia articles, there is nothing I can do; but if your objection is to the gushingly positive descriptions of Zupan's or the "gentrification" of the food industry, I've tried to include some critique of Zupan's to balance out the otherwise rather favorable descriptions of the business. (But I fully expect it might not stand.) Cielquiparle ( talk) 12:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Source review
|
---|
As to new sources presented:
|
As to the suggested ATD, while WP:BASIC anticipates significant coverage could be developed by a combination of independent, reliable, secondary sources, this does not seem supported because the same challenge for developing encyclopedic content on this company and biographies of its owners appears to be the limited and often promotional sourcing that is available at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC) - updated comment to fix typo, expand source review Beccaynr ( talk) 13:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Cielquiparle:I have looked at your addition about plastic bag. This is tangential mention of Zupan's and pure fluff of no real substance. Graywalls ( talk) 21:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The book notes: "Founded by the late John Zupan in 1975, Zupan's is a locally-and family-owned market that serves Portland's food-loving community. Likened to farmers markets, Zupan's focuses on quality, selling everything from the best meats and wines to the freshest produce, baked goods, gourmet deli products, specialty foods, flowers and more. Touting a unique grocery shopping experience, Zupan's stores are meant to indulge the senses, inviting customers to see, smell, taste and learn. Regularly scheduled beer, wine and cheese tastings are among customer favorites. Full-service floral departments (Burnside, Boones Ferry and Macadam locations) have beautiful fresh-cut flowers year-round and provide custom design, wedding and event services. The deli features handmade, home-style items with grab-n-go meals, gourmet sandwiches and catering. Bakery items are delivered from 35 of the best bakeries around the Portland area."
The source contains quotes from the subject but there is sufficient independent reporting to amount to significant coverage. The article notes: "Zupan's, with headquarters in Vancouver by no means has the lock on specialty groceries and prepared foods. Among the most prominent are Nature's, Whole Food Markets and New Seasons. Trader Joe's, ... Zupan's stores are 15,000 to 20,000 square feet, compared to the 40,000 to 50,000 square feet of the traditional supermarket. ... At one time, there were eight stores, including one store in Battle Ground and two in Vancouver with one on Mill Plain Boulevard and another in Salmon Creek. They were operated as Zupan's Food Pavilion, and, in the case of the Mill Plain store, Food World. Today, there are no Clark County locations. The first two stores in Vancouver were bought in 1989 and sold in the mid-90s."
The article notes: "Imagine the bustling, hip Southeast Belmont business district without Zupan's Market. Belmont residents don't want to think about it. But it could happen if the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, the Portland City Council and the Portland Police Bureau revoke the store's liquor license."
For the coverage to be significant, the sources must describe and discuss in some depth the treatment of the employees or major changes in leadership instead of just listing the fact that the corporation employs 500 people or mentioning that John Smith was appointed as the new CEO.In other words, it's OK if the SIGCOV focuses on a specific aspect of the company, or a specific milestone, or a specific event, as long as it does so in-depth and in a meaningful way. Nowhere does it say that every piece of SIGCOV we are counting for notability must be totally comprehensive about every aspect of the company. For this reason, I stand by my original argument that multiple sources exist to satisfy WP:NCORP. (I accept that travel guides tend to be somewhat problematic though.) Cielquiparle ( talk) 14:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Uttara Sporting Club. ✗ plicit 14:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Minor cricket team that never played any official FC/LA/T20 matches. They played only first division cricket league and haven't ever been promoted to Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League. The only mentions are in a match report, which says that the team had won a match in the first division league. Couldn't find any independent coverage about the team to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NORG RoboCric Let's chat 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find sources establishing the notability of this person. Their ideas seem to be WP:FRINGE (e.g. the magnetic field of the earth unifies the hearts of all humanity into a "global consciousness") but there's little engagement with them by reliable sources. The existing article has few citations and none of them establish notability. I can't find secondary sources documenting this person's history or work. Chase Kanipe ( talk) 14:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
An insignificant list completely made of WP:OR. Records are about a minor cricket league, not even having T20 status. None of the stats are included in ESPNcricinfo or any other stats page as a group (of all seasons). Fails WP:NLIST and falls under WP:NOTSTATS. RoboCric Let's chat 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 13:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Previous AfD ended in no consensus. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nepal women Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT in absence of significant coverage about the subject. As her participation in T20I matches were not for a full member country, it doesn't either contribute towards WP:NCRIC. RoboCric Let's chat 14:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
There is, of course, local coverage, but I wasn't able to find sources indicating notability. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to East Providence, Rhode Island. toweli ( talk) 13:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Not sure how this got past AFC. It did chart, but no independent reliable sources. One website, savingcountrymusic, fails WP:RS, as does Riot Fest, which isn't independent anyway, the others are primary. The one blip on the radar, being #70, doesn't give the article a pass on having multiple reliable sources that have significant coverage of the band. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nobody wants to keep this, and the "redirect" opinion does not propose a specific redirect target. It is also beside the point of the AfD, by not addressing the reason provided for deletion (lack of notability), but attacking the nominator's motives and going on a weird tangent by making allegations against a shadowy cabal of editors. I'm therefore giving this opinion no weight in assessing consensus, but noting that nothing prevents the creation of a redirect to wherever people may think appropriate. Sandstein 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Radio stations must meet at least WP:GNG. This defunct high school radio station from a village of less than 100 people has had zero secondary sources since its creation 16 years ago. Could not locate any useful secondary sources to demonstrate notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Article does not establish notability, and low-power FM radio stations in the US are generally non-notable.. Suffice it to say that's a deletion rationale that, in this topic area, you would have been more likely to encounter today [after a 2021 RfC closed the books on the notion on broadcast stations getting a more lenient notability guideline than the GNG] than in 2007…) For what it's worth, while non-notability is probably as unable to be inherited as notability is, Eagle Community School itself has no article, so any redirect in that realm isn't happening (the school district it's in does, but a redirect would be a surprise and a merge would be undue). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Theroadislong ( talk) 12:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013. ✗ plicit 14:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Article created with one source the day of the event. 10 years on I'm not seeing any WP:LASTING impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 11:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 11:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 11:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This article also could be deleted via CSD G5 as it became a battleground between different sockfarms. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-Notable actor and journalist, failed in wikipedia general notability guideline Also, I noticed that this article has been accused of being a 'paid article' before, and the same argument was made in the last nomination as well. So I think now the editors should be allowed to decide. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 11:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 10:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable as a single event for a bio
WP:1E, or as an
WP:NEVENT. Withdrawn.
microbiologyMarcus
petri dish·
growths 10:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
i still working add for trail for wiki page by -- Sunuraju ( talk) 10:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable amateur/local brass band. I can find nothing to indicate that the subject of this (effectively orphaned) article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBAND. In terms of SIGCOV, and after exhaustive searches (for reliable/independent sources to expand the article beyond the single/primary source we have), the only coverage I can find are passing mentions in regional papers - like these listings entries in the Belfast Telegraph. And "local interest" stories in similar papers - like this in the News Letter). And passing mentions (in articles about people connected to the subject) - like these online pieces in the local news website Northernirelandworld.com. I can find no coverage at all by the BBC or other non-local outlets. Google searches (for various combinations of the subject's name) barely return a few hundred results. Mainly the subject's own website, social channels and this Wikipedia article and its mirrors. That we need to rely entirely on primary sources, to establish even the basic facts, suggests that SIGCOV is not met. The NBAND issues are self evident. This local amateur brass band hasn't charted or released an album on a major label. And coming 2nd in a very specific category in a North of Ireland Bands' Association competition is objectively not success in "a major music award"... I have reviewed possible WP:ATDs. But draftifying this ancient article serves no purpose and I can't recommend redirection anywhere (like to Carrickfergus - as there is no related section and creating one would give UNDUE weight/preference to a single otherwise non-notable local community group). I, frankly, can't fathom why this article was created in the first place. Its original incarnation reads entirely like WP:NOTWEBHOST content.... Guliolopez ( talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Guliolopez ( talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable;
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Too small a snippet of history to be notable enough to have its own article - no objection if someone merges it if they know a suitable article to merge into Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 10:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources generally fail WP:ORGIND (interviews with the founders, reprints of office moving announcements, coverage of their own awards) or are trivial coverage (one-sentence CNN mention, startup rankings). ~ A412 talk! 03:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm closing this as Delete. If an editor wants to work on this article, I'm willing to Restore it to Draft space or the helpful admins at WP:REFUND can do that. But because this AFD has been closed as Delete, any draft has to be submitted and approved by WP:AFC or CSD G4 could apply should the draft be moved back, unaltered, to the main space. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and more specifically WP:PRODUCT. Sources in the article that mention the article's subject (many don't, per Talk:Oniro OS#Notability and sourcing issues) and what I could find online consist solely of press releases, primary sources, or churnalism. Aoidh ( talk) 15:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary dab page per WP:ONEOTHER, since both titles are slightly different. It would be best to just add a hatnote on both articles and point them back to each other. CycloneYoris talk! 06:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't think a third relist will generate any more participation. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a resume, not an article with reliable sources and significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Procedural close as no argument for deletion has been included in the nomination statement (well, there is no statement at all). No penalty for another visit to AFD with a more complete nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
TRL ( talk) 03:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
You are celebrating women by deleting a black woman's bio who has represented some of the biggest names in sports and entertainment. OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs) 03:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) — Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This does not seem to be a notable concept. Boleyn ( talk) 22:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2023. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This article was created a day after the event. All the sources are from April 2023, no evidence of WP:LASTING to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 02:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of television stations in California#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even ignoring the contribution of the blocked sock, there is clear consensus to delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases and baby name websites. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 03:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
All of the references are primary sources. I also can't find any secondary sources that are reliable enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 11:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
There are no sources that would establish notability, and a quick Google search doesn't reveal anything else that could establish notability either. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Seems wholly synthetic and redundant as far as lists go. Remsense 诉 00:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 09:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
I could not find significant coverage searching under "Rosemarie Gillespie", "Rosemary Gillespie" and "Waratah Rose" in google news and google books. As well as Australian database trove. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
No proof of notability, no reliable sources that back up claims. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 17:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Has been actively edited recently so do not want to close as soft-delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk) 22:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Those editors advocating Keep would be advised to offer some reliable sourcing that could be used in the article instead of just making claims. I think there is enough objection to this deletion proposal that Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts. I'm closing this as a Merge. I just selected a reasonable target article but information can be Merged to other articles as well that are appropriate. For those editors arguing to Keep this article, no new sources were added to the article or brought into this discussion so either there are none or no one looked for them. Feel free to edit about this incident on whichever articles the content is Merged to. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
A search for ""Pearl continental" gwadar -wikipedia" in google news shows almost all coverage from May 2019. Does not seem to have lasting coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
coverage does not need to be ongoing for notability to be established...a burst or spike of news reports does not automatically make an incident notablesometimes interpreting whether an event is sufficiently notable can be tricky. I consider merging this into Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts is a great ATD seeing as I otherwise would not have a strong opinion either way. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We have no consensus and, right now, two different Merge target articles mentioned (although a mention in each might be appropriate). I was surprised not to see this attack mentioned at
Pearl-Continental Hotels & Resorts which does cover another disastrous incident at one of their hotels. Editors arguing to Keep should share any sources they have found that demonstrates LASTING coverage and influence.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Valery Leontiev. Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
YouTube and the singer’s official website do not demonstrate the significance of the song. Option: redirect to Valery Leontiev.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fresh International Market. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Candidate for political office whose BLP primarily features sources about his business or about his candidacy, and his own website. Fails WP:NPOL. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 22:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't believe the subject meets GNG yet. It may be a case of TOOSOON. He has made a single substitute appearance against a non-professional team. Although he has been noted as one of the youngest players to appear for his club, I don't think he has attracted enough attention for an article yet. It could also be draftified if anyone wished to work on it further. MarchOfThe Greyhounds 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Avocado#Uses. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions that don't show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn following clarification of the article's situation ( non-admin closure). Ouro ( blah blah) 08:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Vote now changed to keep. A lot of the info here is from the company itself. Does not pass WP:CORP, very little coverage about it in general. Additionally, the article reads like an advertisement. Something it would be prudent to consider is to simply merge the article into Mochi ice cream or Mikawaya, since the brand was created after a firm acquired Mikawaya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OsmiumGuard ( talk • contribs) 20:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Han shot first. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Entirely redundant to Han shot first, and I can't seem to find info on the character specifically. Given he's rather minor, I'd support a redirect either to the character list or to Han shot first. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 21:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No policy-based rationale for deletion. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 13:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright, page exists only to promote itself, and not an official C&C game: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30754684 https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30778227 RealAgentJ ( talk) 20:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers as I am unable to fine enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in searches were passing mentions ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Armenia women's international footballers as I am unable to find enough coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I could not find much sources during a BEFORE check other than celebrations and activities by organizations. Suggesting incorporating such content in the nonexistent Safer Internet Day as it got media interest beyond Nigeria only. Toadette ( Let's discuss together!) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Article about a film, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films are not all "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to meet certain specific criteria to qualify for Wikipedia articles -- noteworthy film awards, a
WP:GNG-worthy volume of third-party coverage and analysis (e.g. reviews by professional film critics, etc.) about them, and on and so forth. But the notability claim on offer here is that the film exists, which isn't automatically enough in and of itself, and the referencing is entirely to Q&A interviews in which the filmmaker is talking about her own work in the first person, with absolutely no evidence of independent third-party analysis about the film shown at all.
As it's not a film I'm personally familiar with, I'm perfectly willing to withdraw this if somebody can improve the referencing, but the filmmaker just talking up her own film in her own words doesn't get the film over the notability bar all by itself, if that's all the coverage it has and nobody without a direct personal stake in the film has independently written about or analyzed it in the third person.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
There appears to be nothing of note online about the School - other than a legal dispute in 2021 about which of two teachers should be considered senior. See https://indiankanoon.org/doc/107838062/ Newhaven lad ( talk) 18:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage. He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games. Not notable enough for an article. My Pants Metal ( talk) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting previous AFD
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Furlatt.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The delete arguments made their case. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:NPROF, and does not seem to be meeting WP:GNG. Mentions in secondary source such as Indian Express are running. Also, Chairs/Positions held are non-notable, with multiple department heads/chairs in a single university, mostly on a rotational basis. Publications are journals and chapters(as done by virtually all professors), not full books. Secretary position in said society is below president, and is organisational in nature. User4edits ( talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
highly prestigious academic award. The subject has previously served as the Secretary of the same society. User4edits ( talk) 16:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 15:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
The publication of an anniversary or memorial journal volume or a Festschrift dedicated to a particular person is usually enough to satisfy Criterion 1, except in the case of publication in vanity, fringe, or non-selective journals or presses. Do you think the two publishers, Concept Publishing and Roopa Prakasana, are vanity / fringe / non-selective? I don't know anything about them. Tacyarg ( talk) 15:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
She currently holds the Visiting Professorship of the Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Chair at the University. That means she does not hold that chair. Nonetheless, chairs are far more numerous in Indian Univs than in the US or Europe, and professors could be appointed chair by rotation or mere seniority in the department. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 13:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Passions ran high in this discussion, and strong arguments were raised by both sides. But in the end, participants could not reach a rough consensus about whether the sources establish sufficient notability to meet our guidelines. Owen× ☎ 23:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hyper-local niche family owned grocery store with mere three stores in the Portland, Oregon metro area. Fails WP:NCORP Coverages are all routine and hyper-local. Graywalls ( talk) 02:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
this screams sensationalismwouldn't be helpful. Lastly, the article creator's edit history has no bearing on the notability of the topic. Left guide ( talk) 08:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
inclusion in lists of similar organizations, particularly in "best of", "top 100", "fastest growing" or similar lists, it also appears to be a low-quality website focused on advertising and promotion. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
independence of the author, I would think. Is there some connection between Supermarket News journalist Barbara Murray and Zupan's Markets that I don't know about? P-Makoto (she/her) ( talk) 20:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
generally higher requirements for sources that are used to establish notability than for sources that are allowed as acceptable references within an article. Regardless of editor intent, sources related to companies can tend to be promotional, and if an article is primarily built from such sources and lacks the significant coverage described in the WP:NCORP guideline, it can be excluded according to the notability guideline and WP:NOT policy. For example, this article includes several bizjournals.com sources - which is American City Business Journals, a source that describes itself as "the premier media platform for companies strategically targeting business decision-makers," so this does not appear to be the type of independent content that helps support company notability. There are also several news reports related to the death of the founder; announcements of store openings and closings and products ( examples of trivial coverage); several reports about donating food boxes (see WP:ORGTRIV); and references to various books (cited without page numbers) used to support limited content in the article. The WP:SIRS coverage needed to support a standalone article does not seem to be available at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 17:29, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 17:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
it doesn't help save an article to include every mention of the article subject. Quality, not quantity helps both those wanting to preserve an article and those who are advocating Delete.Beccaynr ( talk) 19:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
off-topic
|
---|
|
as a catalyst for mixed-use development in a high-poverty neighborhood, and includes the opinion of other businesses in the neighborhood, with zero commentary from Zupan's. Another piece of significant coverage that seeks to take an independent, balanced view of Zupan's Markets is the 1999 Business Journal article "Hero or villain? Zupan's blunders ignite passions"; although it includes quotes from John Zupan and his lawyer, it also includes other quotes from the Portland City Council and the Oregon Liquor Control Commission. If this is a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT and you feel that only national chains like Safeway, Albertson's, Trader Joe's, and Whole Foods deserve Wikipedia articles, there is nothing I can do; but if your objection is to the gushingly positive descriptions of Zupan's or the "gentrification" of the food industry, I've tried to include some critique of Zupan's to balance out the otherwise rather favorable descriptions of the business. (But I fully expect it might not stand.) Cielquiparle ( talk) 12:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Source review
|
---|
As to new sources presented:
|
As to the suggested ATD, while WP:BASIC anticipates significant coverage could be developed by a combination of independent, reliable, secondary sources, this does not seem supported because the same challenge for developing encyclopedic content on this company and biographies of its owners appears to be the limited and often promotional sourcing that is available at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 16:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC) - updated comment to fix typo, expand source review Beccaynr ( talk) 13:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
@ Cielquiparle:I have looked at your addition about plastic bag. This is tangential mention of Zupan's and pure fluff of no real substance. Graywalls ( talk) 21:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The book notes: "Founded by the late John Zupan in 1975, Zupan's is a locally-and family-owned market that serves Portland's food-loving community. Likened to farmers markets, Zupan's focuses on quality, selling everything from the best meats and wines to the freshest produce, baked goods, gourmet deli products, specialty foods, flowers and more. Touting a unique grocery shopping experience, Zupan's stores are meant to indulge the senses, inviting customers to see, smell, taste and learn. Regularly scheduled beer, wine and cheese tastings are among customer favorites. Full-service floral departments (Burnside, Boones Ferry and Macadam locations) have beautiful fresh-cut flowers year-round and provide custom design, wedding and event services. The deli features handmade, home-style items with grab-n-go meals, gourmet sandwiches and catering. Bakery items are delivered from 35 of the best bakeries around the Portland area."
The source contains quotes from the subject but there is sufficient independent reporting to amount to significant coverage. The article notes: "Zupan's, with headquarters in Vancouver by no means has the lock on specialty groceries and prepared foods. Among the most prominent are Nature's, Whole Food Markets and New Seasons. Trader Joe's, ... Zupan's stores are 15,000 to 20,000 square feet, compared to the 40,000 to 50,000 square feet of the traditional supermarket. ... At one time, there were eight stores, including one store in Battle Ground and two in Vancouver with one on Mill Plain Boulevard and another in Salmon Creek. They were operated as Zupan's Food Pavilion, and, in the case of the Mill Plain store, Food World. Today, there are no Clark County locations. The first two stores in Vancouver were bought in 1989 and sold in the mid-90s."
The article notes: "Imagine the bustling, hip Southeast Belmont business district without Zupan's Market. Belmont residents don't want to think about it. But it could happen if the Oregon Liquor Control Commission, the Portland City Council and the Portland Police Bureau revoke the store's liquor license."
For the coverage to be significant, the sources must describe and discuss in some depth the treatment of the employees or major changes in leadership instead of just listing the fact that the corporation employs 500 people or mentioning that John Smith was appointed as the new CEO.In other words, it's OK if the SIGCOV focuses on a specific aspect of the company, or a specific milestone, or a specific event, as long as it does so in-depth and in a meaningful way. Nowhere does it say that every piece of SIGCOV we are counting for notability must be totally comprehensive about every aspect of the company. For this reason, I stand by my original argument that multiple sources exist to satisfy WP:NCORP. (I accept that travel guides tend to be somewhat problematic though.) Cielquiparle ( talk) 14:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Uttara Sporting Club. ✗ plicit 14:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Minor cricket team that never played any official FC/LA/T20 matches. They played only first division cricket league and haven't ever been promoted to Dhaka Premier Division Cricket League. The only mentions are in a match report, which says that the team had won a match in the first division league. Couldn't find any independent coverage about the team to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NORG RoboCric Let's chat 14:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find sources establishing the notability of this person. Their ideas seem to be WP:FRINGE (e.g. the magnetic field of the earth unifies the hearts of all humanity into a "global consciousness") but there's little engagement with them by reliable sources. The existing article has few citations and none of them establish notability. I can't find secondary sources documenting this person's history or work. Chase Kanipe ( talk) 14:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
An insignificant list completely made of WP:OR. Records are about a minor cricket league, not even having T20 status. None of the stats are included in ESPNcricinfo or any other stats page as a group (of all seasons). Fails WP:NLIST and falls under WP:NOTSTATS. RoboCric Let's chat 14:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🍪 Cookie Monster 13:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Previous AfD ended in no consensus. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Nepal women Twenty20 International cricketers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT in absence of significant coverage about the subject. As her participation in T20I matches were not for a full member country, it doesn't either contribute towards WP:NCRIC. RoboCric Let's chat 14:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
There is, of course, local coverage, but I wasn't able to find sources indicating notability. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to East Providence, Rhode Island. toweli ( talk) 13:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Not sure how this got past AFC. It did chart, but no independent reliable sources. One website, savingcountrymusic, fails WP:RS, as does Riot Fest, which isn't independent anyway, the others are primary. The one blip on the radar, being #70, doesn't give the article a pass on having multiple reliable sources that have significant coverage of the band. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 13:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Nobody wants to keep this, and the "redirect" opinion does not propose a specific redirect target. It is also beside the point of the AfD, by not addressing the reason provided for deletion (lack of notability), but attacking the nominator's motives and going on a weird tangent by making allegations against a shadowy cabal of editors. I'm therefore giving this opinion no weight in assessing consensus, but noting that nothing prevents the creation of a redirect to wherever people may think appropriate. Sandstein 17:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Radio stations must meet at least WP:GNG. This defunct high school radio station from a village of less than 100 people has had zero secondary sources since its creation 16 years ago. Could not locate any useful secondary sources to demonstrate notability. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Article does not establish notability, and low-power FM radio stations in the US are generally non-notable.. Suffice it to say that's a deletion rationale that, in this topic area, you would have been more likely to encounter today [after a 2021 RfC closed the books on the notion on broadcast stations getting a more lenient notability guideline than the GNG] than in 2007…) For what it's worth, while non-notability is probably as unable to be inherited as notability is, Eagle Community School itself has no article, so any redirect in that realm isn't happening (the school district it's in does, but a redirect would be a surprise and a merge would be undue). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Theroadislong ( talk) 12:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013. ✗ plicit 14:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Article created with one source the day of the event. 10 years on I'm not seeing any WP:LASTING impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 11:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 11:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 11:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. This article also could be deleted via CSD G5 as it became a battleground between different sockfarms. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-Notable actor and journalist, failed in wikipedia general notability guideline Also, I noticed that this article has been accused of being a 'paid article' before, and the same argument was made in the last nomination as well. So I think now the editors should be allowed to decide. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already at AFD so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 11:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 10:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable as a single event for a bio
WP:1E, or as an
WP:NEVENT. Withdrawn.
microbiologyMarcus
petri dish·
growths 10:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
i still working add for trail for wiki page by -- Sunuraju ( talk) 10:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable amateur/local brass band. I can find nothing to indicate that the subject of this (effectively orphaned) article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBAND. In terms of SIGCOV, and after exhaustive searches (for reliable/independent sources to expand the article beyond the single/primary source we have), the only coverage I can find are passing mentions in regional papers - like these listings entries in the Belfast Telegraph. And "local interest" stories in similar papers - like this in the News Letter). And passing mentions (in articles about people connected to the subject) - like these online pieces in the local news website Northernirelandworld.com. I can find no coverage at all by the BBC or other non-local outlets. Google searches (for various combinations of the subject's name) barely return a few hundred results. Mainly the subject's own website, social channels and this Wikipedia article and its mirrors. That we need to rely entirely on primary sources, to establish even the basic facts, suggests that SIGCOV is not met. The NBAND issues are self evident. This local amateur brass band hasn't charted or released an album on a major label. And coming 2nd in a very specific category in a North of Ireland Bands' Association competition is objectively not success in "a major music award"... I have reviewed possible WP:ATDs. But draftifying this ancient article serves no purpose and I can't recommend redirection anywhere (like to Carrickfergus - as there is no related section and creating one would give UNDUE weight/preference to a single otherwise non-notable local community group). I, frankly, can't fathom why this article was created in the first place. Its original incarnation reads entirely like WP:NOTWEBHOST content.... Guliolopez ( talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Guliolopez ( talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:59, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Not notable;
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Too small a snippet of history to be notable enough to have its own article - no objection if someone merges it if they know a suitable article to merge into Chidgk1 ( talk) 07:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 10:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources generally fail WP:ORGIND (interviews with the founders, reprints of office moving announcements, coverage of their own awards) or are trivial coverage (one-sentence CNN mention, startup rankings). ~ A412 talk! 03:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm closing this as Delete. If an editor wants to work on this article, I'm willing to Restore it to Draft space or the helpful admins at WP:REFUND can do that. But because this AFD has been closed as Delete, any draft has to be submitted and approved by WP:AFC or CSD G4 could apply should the draft be moved back, unaltered, to the main space. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and more specifically WP:PRODUCT. Sources in the article that mention the article's subject (many don't, per Talk:Oniro OS#Notability and sourcing issues) and what I could find online consist solely of press releases, primary sources, or churnalism. Aoidh ( talk) 15:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 02:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary dab page per WP:ONEOTHER, since both titles are slightly different. It would be best to just add a hatnote on both articles and point them back to each other. CycloneYoris talk! 06:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't think a third relist will generate any more participation. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a resume, not an article with reliable sources and significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:48, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Procedural close as no argument for deletion has been included in the nomination statement (well, there is no statement at all). No penalty for another visit to AFD with a more complete nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
TRL ( talk) 03:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
You are celebrating women by deleting a black woman's bio who has represented some of the biggest names in sports and entertainment. OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs) 03:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC) — Mickey1009 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
This does not seem to be a notable concept. Boleyn ( talk) 22:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2023. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This article was created a day after the event. All the sources are from April 2023, no evidence of WP:LASTING to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 02:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of television stations in California#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Even ignoring the contribution of the blocked sock, there is clear consensus to delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 12:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases and baby name websites. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 03:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
All of the references are primary sources. I also can't find any secondary sources that are reliable enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 11:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
There are no sources that would establish notability, and a quick Google search doesn't reveal anything else that could establish notability either. HyperAccelerated ( talk) 01:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus to Delete this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Seems wholly synthetic and redundant as far as lists go. Remsense 诉 00:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)