The result was redirect to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nothing notable, nor relevant per GNG. No SIGCOV Gavrover ( talk) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability Considerusinga ( talk) 21:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Unclear this business is notable. The article seems to have been created as an advertisement for it. -- Beland ( talk) 20:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It does not seem like the characters of this show are discussed in any reliable sources individually or as a group. This article uses primary sources exclusively, and I could not find any good sources in my BEFORE check. The one interwiki link also had little of use. QuicoleJR ( talk) 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to AA Rano Industries#Subsidiaries. Daniel ( talk) 22:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Refs are not about the company, rather about people complaining about the high price of gas. Fails WP:GNG . There remains a draft ( Draft:RanoGaz Company - LPG) which has had several reviews but remain unapproved. This new version appears to be an attempt to avoid review. Velella Velella Talk 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Article does not assert notability, therefore fail WP:NCORP - the only ones i can find is reports of mass layoffs and reported bankruptcy. Sources in the body text are hardly what you call reliable third party sources. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet general notability guidelines and lacks sources. The one source the article does have is dubious as well. Samoht27 ( talk) 20:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Article was previously nominated in a WP:BUNDLE, which was closed as a procedural keep. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I searched using both Sipho and Siphosenkosi as his first name. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep per consensus. Page move can discussed, if required, in article talk page, outside AfD. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources of unclear reliability and significance. Almost identical to content previously deleted and salted at Nitin Dubey * Pppery * it has begun... 18:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 19:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this programme was notable. Boleyn ( talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Desertarun ( talk) 21:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Repost of content previously deleted and salted at Ruben Muradyan * Pppery * it has begun... 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
a well-known and significant award or honor? If it truly were one then presumably its article would be more than a tiny stub. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I found lots of trivial mentions, especially from 2015 to 2018, but nothing substantial. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Essentially an unsourced biography of a living person for nearly twenty years. WorldCat is not useful for establishing notability, yet it is the only source for the entire article. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Almost completely WP:UNSOURCED since creation, WP:OR. The only two sources do not contain the phrase "Southern Caribbean". On the Internet, it seems to be mainly used by cruise ship industry promotions. No WP:RS properly or consistently define the phrase, and apart from "South Caribbean" being a term in plate tectonics, nobody seems to be regarding this as a distinct region with its own separate identity/history/culture/music etc. other than the sum of its parts. Similar situation with Caribbean South America, just a lot more unsourced text. Formally proposing deletion after rejected WP:PROD. NLeeuw ( talk) 18:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
there is no significant coverage in reliable sources. The existing sources mostly consist of interviews with its founder, routine coverage, or mere name drops, with many not even mentioning "Garcha Hotels." A Google News search yielded similar results, failing to establish notability according to WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS 💬 18:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG, most sources are just links to his music on streaming sites. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 18:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable enough person for an article. Fails WP:NBIO - barely any coverage in reliable secondary sources. Kk.urban ( talk) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. Agusmagni ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sources are mainly mentions, NEWSORGINDIA, or otherwise unreliable. I can find references that verify its existence but that it about it. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters#Richard Bellamy. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2016, nothing found via WP:BEFORE. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 17:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE. As for the rest, I don’t know whether she meets the criteria for notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hopefully, some of these sources can find their way into the article soon. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not meet WP:NBAD; Fails GNG Stvbastian ( talk) 09:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "本屆第二面金牌!世大運中華隊值得你關注的羽球球員:「左手重砲」林俊易、「新一代最強女雙」李佳馨、鄧淳薰! 在擁有豐富經驗的李佳馨、鄧淳薰,在世大運混團最後一點穩定的發揮下,中華隊在本屆世大運混合團體賽,收下了本屆的第二面金牌。"
From Google Translate: "Second gold medal this year! The badminton players of the Chinese team in the Universiade who deserve your attention: "The left-handed heavy gun" Lin Junyi, "the strongest women's doubles of the new generation" Li Jiaxin and Deng Chunxun! Thanks to the stable performance of Li Jiaxin and Deng Chunxun, who have rich experience in the World Universiade mixed team, the Chinese team won its second gold medal in the World Universiade mixed team competition."
The article notes: "身高173公分的鄧淳薰,無疑是最後一個關鍵賽事的亮點;有14年球齡的她,由於有身材上的優勢,爆發力十足,因此後場扣壓的能力相當突出:本場比賽前,這對組合世界排名第20,相較於對手李汶妹、劉玄炫世界排名第14是稍微低了一點,但2020年成軍的「馨薰配」從過去效力中租就已經默契滿分,甚至還被封為「新一代最強女雙」,不負眾望,最終也讓中國隊看到了「最強」的威力。"
From Google Translate: "Deng Chunxun, who is 173 centimeters tall, is undoubtedly the highlight of the last key event; with 14 years of playing experience, she has a physical advantage and is full of explosive power, so her ability to press in the backcourt is quite outstanding: Before this game, this pair Ranked 20th in the world, which is a little lower than opponents Li Wenmei and Liu Xuanxuan, ranked 14th in the world. However, the "Xin–Xun pair" that joined together in 2020 has already had a tacit understanding of perfect scores since playing in the past and was even named "The strongest women's doubles of the new generation" lived up to expectations and finally allowed the Chinese team to see the "strongest" power."
The article notes: "剛代表中華隊參與成都世大運,並拿下羽球混雙項目銀牌以及混合團體項目金牌的小將鄧淳薰,也將披上國家隊戰袍出戰接下來的杭州亞運,身為中華羽球女團中年紀最小的「忙內」,第一次出戰亞運坦言,「能打到哪裡就是哪裡。」同時也期盼能夠叩關女單項目的8強甚至4強。"
From Google Translate: "Deng Chunxun, the young player who just represented the Chinese team in the 2021 Summer World University Games and won the silver medal in the badminton mixed doubles event and the gold medal in the mixed team event, will also put on the national team jersey and compete in the next Asian Games in Hangzhou. As a middle-aged member of the Chinese badminton women's team The youngest "maknae", who is participating in the Asian Games for the first time, said frankly, "I can play wherever I can." At the same time, she also hopes to reach the top 8 or even the top 4 in the women's singles event."
The article notes: "就讀台北市立大同高中國中部三年級的李子晴與鄧淳薰,從小就是羽球女雙搭檔,展現出超齡的實力與擊球威力,她們先在今年1月舉行的第1次全國排名賽勇奪乙組第一與甲組門票,轉戰台東全中運更是勢如破竹,1局未失登上后座。 ... 兩人球路與個性互補,李子晴個性大方,鄧淳薰則較為內向,在球場上也是李子晴較為主動,鄧淳薰則以補攻為主,成為絕佳拍檔,她們本次不斷打下國中女雙金牌,也率隊打下女團金牌,一舉進帳兩金。"
From Google Translate: "Li Ziqing and Deng Chunxun, who are in the third grade of Taipei Municipal Datong High School, have been a badminton women's doubles partner since childhood. They showed their strength and hitting power beyond their years. They first won the Group B in the first national ranking tournament held in January this year. First and Group A tickets, the move to the Taitung All-China Games was even more impressive, without losing a single game. ... The two players have complementary skills and personalities. Li Ziqing has a generous personality, while Deng Chunxun is more introverted. Li Ziqing is more proactive on the court, while Deng Chunxun focuses on making up the offense. They have become an excellent partner. They have continuously won gold medals in the junior high school women's doubles this time. , also led the team to win the women's team gold medal, winning two gold medals in one fell swoop."
The article notes: "新冠疫情後要留給有準備好的人,很明顯,來自中租的「馨薰配」李佳馨/鄧淳薰組合準備的非常充足,「馨薰配」今在全運羽球女雙金牌戰的北市內戰中再以直落二(21:8、21:15)打敗吳玓蓉/程郁捷奪金,疫情後已連15勝包辦全排、全大運和全運三冠,儼然已經是台灣新一代最強女雙。... 「馨薰配」中的鄧淳薰今年更是首度參加全運就順利摘金而回"
From Google Translate: "After the COVID-19 pandemic, it must be left to those who are prepared. It is obvious that the "Xin–Xun pair" Li Jiaxin/Deng Chunxun combination from Chailease is very well prepared. The "Xin–Xun pair" is currently playing badminton in the National Games In the women's doubles gold medal match in Beishi Civil War, they defeated Wu Zhenrong/Cheng Yujie in straight games (21:8, 21:15) to win the gold medal. After the pandemic, they have won 15 consecutive victories to win the three championships of the National Parade, Universiade and National Games. It seems that they have already won the gold medal. They are the strongest women's doubles team of Taiwan's new generation. ... Deng Chunxun in the "Xin–Xun Pair" participated in the National Games for the first time this year and successfully won the gold medal."
The article notes: "從小學就搭檔至今的北市大同女雙鄧淳薰/李子晴,19日準決賽先以22:20、21:11擊敗自家姐妹孫妏沛/陳奕璇,再於決賽以21:12、21:16取勝南市永康梁家微/鄭育沛,贏得她們國中生涯首座全國大賽后冠。身為大會第1種子的鄧李配,不僅首輪輪空,且場場快速解決對手,堪稱這次女雙最強拍檔 ... 今年全中運屈居第四的鄧李配,賽後鄧淳薰哭的像是淚人兒般,本屆國中盃終於一嚐摘冠心願"
From Google Translate: "Beishi Datong Women's Doubles Deng Chunxun/Li Ziqing, who have been partners since elementary school, first defeated their sisters Sun Yupei/Chen Yixuan in the semi-finals on the 19th 22:20, 21:11, and then defeated Nanshi Yongkang in the final 21:12, 21:16 Liang Jiawei/Zheng Yupei won the first national championship in their junior high school career. ... As the No. 1 seed in the conference, Deng and Li Pei not only received a bye in the first round, but also quickly defeated their opponents in every game. They can be called the strongest partner in women's doubles this time. ... Deng and Li Pei, who finished fourth in the National Games this year, cried like tears after the game. This year's Junior High School Cup finally got a chance to win the championship."
The article notes: "北市大同高2女雙鄧淳薰/李子晴與高雄中學3年級鄭育沛/梁家溦在冠軍戰演出「自家姊妹」對決戲碼,最終鄧李配技高一籌,花費35分鐘以21:16、21:19拿下比賽,也獲兩人搭配以來在國際成人賽第一冠。"
From Google Translate: "The second-year girls' doubles team of Datong High School in Peking City, Deng Chunxun/Li Ziqing, and Kaohsiung Middle School third-graders Zheng Yupei/Liang Jiaman performed a "sister" showdown in the championship match. In the end, Deng and Li were superior in supporting skills and won in 35 minutes with 21:16, 21:19. In the competition, they also won the first international adult championship since the two teamed up."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
A dump of a 1000 names. Strongly fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Names are even in Cyrillic, so not readable for most readers of an encyclopedia that uses a Latin alphabet. I am also nominating:
The result was merge to Tire-pressure monitoring system. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the Federal Register. There are a large number of articles like this one which should also be evaluated for notability, I encountered this article through New Page Patrol. No secondary coverage present. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
He doesn't seem to meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Working actors, but not the significance of roles needed. Also currently an unref BLP. Boleyn ( talk) 15:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Articles that have been proposed for deletion are ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability, the one reliable source Is the one referenced on the page which makes it clear the charter refering to the abbey having been built is probably fraudulent. I can find no other historical source that references any abbey existing in Bradfield. Tim Landy ( talk) 15:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:N
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
no notability, created by blocked paid editor. Testeraccount100 ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized ("Malvankar's unwavering commitment and strategic vision have positioned him as a catalyst for positive transformation in Goa's political landscape")
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NPOL. The main notability claim here is that he's the leader of the youth chapter of a state-level political party, which is not an "inherently" notable role -- it could get him into Wikipedia if he were shown to pass
WP:GNG, but does not automatically entitle him to a guaranteed inclusion freebie just because he exists.
But the referencing here is not getting him over GNG: it's referenced to one
primary source, one glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about something else, and one article that doesn't even mention his name at all, and appears to be here just to tangentially verify that the political party he works for exists, none of which is support for his standalone notability as an individual at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Notability. Single ref makes no mention of this being a chain. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to No. 659 Squadron RAF. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The article has almost no information not included in either No. 659 Squadron RAF or 1 Regiment Army Air Corps. PercyPigUK ( talk) 14:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The 4 sources are from the time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. Also no deaths reported so WP:NOTNEWS also applies. Also oppose merging with any terrorism article as it is not clear this event was terrorism. LibStar ( talk) 09:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The 9 sources are from the time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 09:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:AUTHOR. The main notability claim on offer here is that her work exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient coverage and analysis about her work to get her over
WP:GNG -- but the only reference cited here is a
primary source that isn't support for notability at all.
As I don't read Swedish, I'm perfectly willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to archived Swedish media coverage than I've got can find enough to salvage it -- but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The next few months will likely provide more clarity regarding lasting notability as a standalone event. Owen× ☎ 21:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. Insignificant, one off airstrike among hundreds, if not thousands of airstrikes in the span of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Ecrusized ( talk) 18:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Before 2017, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject both to the standards of notability, as well as those for organizations.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An analysis of sources per WP:GNG would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 13:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. While it could be argued that this discussion should be closed as No consensus I find the new accounts who popped up to argue for Deletion more than a little suspicious. AFD is not a place that new editors find on their first few days editing. Plus those editors arguing to Keep this article are AFD regulars I trust. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:NACTOR. None of the cited sources are considered reliable. I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:ENT/ WP:GNG— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raqib Sheikh ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus currently seems split between redirect and delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 13:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Advert of non-notable (only trivial coverage) website. Flounder fillet ( talk) 12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Biography of subject that doesn't meet WP:NBIO or WP:MUSICBIO or other criteria. (Article was created, seemingly, by a family member. And relies entirely on sources written by family members. Was speedy deleted in 2007. Was restored, after request from creator, shortly afterwards - on the basis that notability might be established by "news reports" and having a music retreat "named for him". However, the only news report mentioned (which doesn't appear to be verifiable) seems to be about the music retreat. Rather than the subject. And while it is a credit to the man/family/community that the event was so-named, it doesn't establish notability. Even if the event was notable (and I would question whether it is), notability isn't transferrable.) My own WP:BEFORE has returned nothing to indicate that NBIO or SIGCOV are met. WP:COI and WP:NOTMEMORIAL are also relevant. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUMS, unable to find any reliable sources for the mixtape. Only able to find something about The YS Collection compilation, which is not this mixtape. I found this review from Sputnikmusic, but it only critiques the mixtape and offers no further insight to the mixtape apart from surface-level coverage. Regardless, one source isn't enough for notability. Locust member ( talk) 13:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
As the subject of the article is an unincorporated community with a population of just 26 with no notable details listed about it beyond it being named after William H. Seward, it does not appear to be sufficiently notable to have an article of its own. CoolieCoolster ( talk) 12:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legacy of Roberto Clemente. And/or to Louisville Slugger Museum & Factory, whichever interested editors prefer. Sandstein 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable statue. And I don't know how relevant this is but the location is also not significant to the baseball player who is depicted. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 10:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years and WP:NOTPLOT. Could redirect to List of Catch-22 characters as AtD JMWt ( talk) 09:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Previously deleted and salted at House of Hiranandani. This is not quite substantially identical to the deleted version, but I see no new in-depth sources to establish notability * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested draftification (essentially copy/pasted back from Draft:Michael Lahyani). Borderline A7/G11 IMO, no real coverage beyond the standard SPIP. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Previously deleted. Regarding real world notability the strongest two things are that he was the father of the President of the Maldives and he won a "National Award of Honor" for" for "contribution in the area of religious awareness and religious education". Of the references, two are short obit descriptions, one lists the award recipients (with no other text) and the rest don't cover him. North8000 ( talk) 14:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
No in-depth coverage on the internet, nearly unsourced advertisement. Flounder fillet ( talk) 12:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a reference to his employer's website; but cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources, and do not think he meets WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 13:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to improve this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Zero inline sources in entire article, no evidence of significant notability online. The article is of significant length, but there are few sources and none inline. 2003 LN 6 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. While eBay is obviously notable, it's not clear that its API is. The article itself is extremely support with little more than a feature list, and the only sources are eBay itself. I would suggest merging into eBay but its really not obvious what the notability of this is--lots of websites have APIs. TheRealOj32 ( talk) 06:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NORG. The sources are all paid PRs. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 06:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP a before finds no significant coverage in independent sources, the article has only primary sources, seems like there is nothing else. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Newbern, Alabama. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Falls clearly within WP:SINGLEEVENT. Braxton is notable only for one event - the controversy over his mayoral election. He is not even notable for being mayor, as he has done nothing significant in his capacity as mayor (likely due to the controversy), and the position of mayor of this tiny town is not itself notable. The controversy is currently covered in the Newbern, Alabama, article, which is the appropriate place for that. There is no need to have this separate article whose subject is not notable. Ergo Sum 03:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
On point (1) the nom is correct. Reliable sources only cover the subject with respect to this event. It is a BLP1E. On (2) I am unconvinced. It appears likely that the town will be forced to hold elections and the subject could win such elections, and that this would be notable and covered widely. That is speculation at this stage and WP:TOOSOON applies, but I don't think it is likely they will return to a low profile. On (3) the event is, in fact, quite significant, and is already reasonably well documented, although largely in primay sources.So I think coverage of this is due. But the nom. also correctly points out it is covered in the Newbern, Alabama page. It should be there, but the case is significant enough and notable enough that I think, per WP:PAGEDECIDE, there is a good case for a spinout page that discusses this in particular. People will be referring to this event for some time to come, and although it is again TOOSOON to judge the lasting impact, it is likely to be covered in secondary sources as a notable event in its own right. So I find that some article just on the event is due. The only remaining question is whether it is due as a BLP or due as an article on the event. If the latter, this article should be moved and covered as an article on the event and not as a BLP. This is in line with other BLP1Es, e.g. Lucia de Berk case. Note also arm 2 of BLP1E actually suggest merging with an article on the event, such an article being assumed. However that discussion need not be at AfD. An RM could be opened on the page instead. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)1. Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.
2. The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.
3. The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented.
Its coverage has been almost entirely by local sources that likely would not qualify as RS.A quick google of the name reveals that in addition to the UK's Guardian source on the page, it is also covered in the Daily Mail (we all know what we think about that one - but note it is a right wing source), ABC News, CNN, CBS, the Wall Street Journal etc. All of these are news sources, and reporting is generally a primary source but they are all (other than the Daily Mail) reliable sources. Then we have sources like the Equal Justice Initiative [11] and many similar. Also additional information, e.g. [12] - Law & Crime. Again, we are close to the event, and that is always problematic in separating secondary sources from primary, but there is a lot of coverage of this and it is worldwide. It is simply not true that this is entirely local sources. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no references in the article and I can't find any reliable sources online covering the band. XabqEfdg ( talk) 01:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as " G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NORG. Appears to be a promo article for a secondary school for children of military personnel, mainly unsourced. BEFORE found promo, listings, routine mill news, nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 05:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's a lot of discussion, but the "delete" opinions carry the day. In terms of numbers, they're in a relatively substantial majority, 5 to 2 (plus one neutral and draftify each). In terms of arguments, if as here notability is the key issue, a "keep" minority can only prevent deletion by making a compelling policy-based argument for inclusion - i.e., references to the kind of in-depth, independent, reliable coverage that GNG requires. Here, this is not the case.
As regards draftification, an ATD also proposed, there is neither consensus for it nor do I think it would be useful - we draftify stuff if there are reasonable prospects of improvement, but here it seems that three weeks of newspaper archive searches have uncovered most if not all that has been written about the subject. Regardless, if new sources are discoverd, draftification is still possible via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 19:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Being a member of the nobility does not equate to notability. Sources show that he lived , that he had a family and worked as a coutier to a minor royal and that he died, but nothing beyond that. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 08:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not all knighthoods are equal.Indeed. KCVO is two levels above Knight Bachelor, the lowest level of knighthood! Essentially claiming it's not a real knighthood is purely your POV. Claiming his notability is inherited is patently ridiculous. He isn't notable for being married to someone notable; he received his knighthood for his achievements and service just like any other knight.
Anyone appointed equerry to Beatrice would have received this title, irrespective of what they did.No they wouldn't. He was her comptroller and treasurer, the head of her household, not just her equerry. Like it or not, these people held highly influential and notable positions in the United Kingdom, hence their knighthoods. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
obviously being "selected" for inclusion in an unreliable source counts for absolutely nothing. Yup, obviously someone else who hasn't actually bothered to take in what they're citing. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 05:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Rupples ( talk) 16:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability– the many mentions of him and coverage across years of his life, as well as the nation-wide coverage of his death (some of which has some depth and could be considered sigcov imo, e.g. [14]), proves that this satisfies it. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability? There seems to be a pretty fair case for this passing ANYBIO as well. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability); not to mention some sources that could be argued as SIGCOV and a pass of ANYBIO (which needs to hold some weight). BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It is noted in the discussion above that sources are primary and that coverage of the subject is not significant. You point to one source (paywalled) which tells us of his death, confirms he was Gentleman-in-Waiting to princess Beatrice while in Spain and appointed an Equerry and then treasurer of the Household. We learn he was educated at Eton, the names of his parents and died 3 days after a serious operation. Is that SIGCOV? Well it's something. Reliable yes, secondary and independent? Well the notice was probably placed there and it is a report of death. It is not great, but even if we accepted it, it is still not multiple. I am not seeing an NBASIC pass here. But a source analysis is welcome. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, which is what we have here (and I'll note that the obit I referenced is 164 words; that's SIGCOV IMO for a subject like this). The Burke's Peerage source may be primary (?), but the many newspaper refs absolutely can count towards NBASIC, given that they allow us to develop a reasonable portrait of his life, and considering that they do and that we have someone who passes WP:ANYBIO with an honor no subject has ever been deleted while possessing ... this should be kept. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 17:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of [15] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I was considering a Merge but we have an editor objecting to a Merge so I'll close as Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.
The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football in Wallis and Futuna. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of television stations in Tennessee#LPTV stations. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 19:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nothing notable, nor relevant per GNG. No SIGCOV Gavrover ( talk) 20:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability Considerusinga ( talk) 21:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Unclear this business is notable. The article seems to have been created as an advertisement for it. -- Beland ( talk) 20:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It does not seem like the characters of this show are discussed in any reliable sources individually or as a group. This article uses primary sources exclusively, and I could not find any good sources in my BEFORE check. The one interwiki link also had little of use. QuicoleJR ( talk) 21:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to AA Rano Industries#Subsidiaries. Daniel ( talk) 22:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Refs are not about the company, rather about people complaining about the high price of gas. Fails WP:GNG . There remains a draft ( Draft:RanoGaz Company - LPG) which has had several reviews but remain unapproved. This new version appears to be an attempt to avoid review. Velella Velella Talk 21:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Article does not assert notability, therefore fail WP:NCORP - the only ones i can find is reports of mass layoffs and reported bankruptcy. Sources in the body text are hardly what you call reliable third party sources. SpacedFarmer ( talk) 21:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This article does not meet general notability guidelines and lacks sources. The one source the article does have is dubious as well. Samoht27 ( talk) 20:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Article was previously nominated in a WP:BUNDLE, which was closed as a procedural keep. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I searched using both Sipho and Siphosenkosi as his first name. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep per consensus. Page move can discussed, if required, in article talk page, outside AfD. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:REFBOMBed with sources of unclear reliability and significance. Almost identical to content previously deleted and salted at Nitin Dubey * Pppery * it has begun... 18:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 19:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this programme was notable. Boleyn ( talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Desertarun ( talk) 21:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Repost of content previously deleted and salted at Ruben Muradyan * Pppery * it has begun... 16:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 19:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
a well-known and significant award or honor? If it truly were one then presumably its article would be more than a tiny stub. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I found lots of trivial mentions, especially from 2015 to 2018, but nothing substantial. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage of the subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Essentially an unsourced biography of a living person for nearly twenty years. WorldCat is not useful for establishing notability, yet it is the only source for the entire article. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Almost completely WP:UNSOURCED since creation, WP:OR. The only two sources do not contain the phrase "Southern Caribbean". On the Internet, it seems to be mainly used by cruise ship industry promotions. No WP:RS properly or consistently define the phrase, and apart from "South Caribbean" being a term in plate tectonics, nobody seems to be regarding this as a distinct region with its own separate identity/history/culture/music etc. other than the sum of its parts. Similar situation with Caribbean South America, just a lot more unsourced text. Formally proposing deletion after rejected WP:PROD. NLeeuw ( talk) 18:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
there is no significant coverage in reliable sources. The existing sources mostly consist of interviews with its founder, routine coverage, or mere name drops, with many not even mentioning "Garcha Hotels." A Google News search yielded similar results, failing to establish notability according to WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS 💬 18:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG, most sources are just links to his music on streaming sites. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 18:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable enough person for an article. Fails WP:NBIO - barely any coverage in reliable secondary sources. Kk.urban ( talk) 17:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. Agusmagni ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 22:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Sources are mainly mentions, NEWSORGINDIA, or otherwise unreliable. I can find references that verify its existence but that it about it. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series) characters#Richard Bellamy. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced since 2016, nothing found via WP:BEFORE. (Oinkers42) ( talk) 17:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE. As for the rest, I don’t know whether she meets the criteria for notability. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hopefully, some of these sources can find their way into the article soon. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not meet WP:NBAD; Fails GNG Stvbastian ( talk) 09:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "本屆第二面金牌!世大運中華隊值得你關注的羽球球員:「左手重砲」林俊易、「新一代最強女雙」李佳馨、鄧淳薰! 在擁有豐富經驗的李佳馨、鄧淳薰,在世大運混團最後一點穩定的發揮下,中華隊在本屆世大運混合團體賽,收下了本屆的第二面金牌。"
From Google Translate: "Second gold medal this year! The badminton players of the Chinese team in the Universiade who deserve your attention: "The left-handed heavy gun" Lin Junyi, "the strongest women's doubles of the new generation" Li Jiaxin and Deng Chunxun! Thanks to the stable performance of Li Jiaxin and Deng Chunxun, who have rich experience in the World Universiade mixed team, the Chinese team won its second gold medal in the World Universiade mixed team competition."
The article notes: "身高173公分的鄧淳薰,無疑是最後一個關鍵賽事的亮點;有14年球齡的她,由於有身材上的優勢,爆發力十足,因此後場扣壓的能力相當突出:本場比賽前,這對組合世界排名第20,相較於對手李汶妹、劉玄炫世界排名第14是稍微低了一點,但2020年成軍的「馨薰配」從過去效力中租就已經默契滿分,甚至還被封為「新一代最強女雙」,不負眾望,最終也讓中國隊看到了「最強」的威力。"
From Google Translate: "Deng Chunxun, who is 173 centimeters tall, is undoubtedly the highlight of the last key event; with 14 years of playing experience, she has a physical advantage and is full of explosive power, so her ability to press in the backcourt is quite outstanding: Before this game, this pair Ranked 20th in the world, which is a little lower than opponents Li Wenmei and Liu Xuanxuan, ranked 14th in the world. However, the "Xin–Xun pair" that joined together in 2020 has already had a tacit understanding of perfect scores since playing in the past and was even named "The strongest women's doubles of the new generation" lived up to expectations and finally allowed the Chinese team to see the "strongest" power."
The article notes: "剛代表中華隊參與成都世大運,並拿下羽球混雙項目銀牌以及混合團體項目金牌的小將鄧淳薰,也將披上國家隊戰袍出戰接下來的杭州亞運,身為中華羽球女團中年紀最小的「忙內」,第一次出戰亞運坦言,「能打到哪裡就是哪裡。」同時也期盼能夠叩關女單項目的8強甚至4強。"
From Google Translate: "Deng Chunxun, the young player who just represented the Chinese team in the 2021 Summer World University Games and won the silver medal in the badminton mixed doubles event and the gold medal in the mixed team event, will also put on the national team jersey and compete in the next Asian Games in Hangzhou. As a middle-aged member of the Chinese badminton women's team The youngest "maknae", who is participating in the Asian Games for the first time, said frankly, "I can play wherever I can." At the same time, she also hopes to reach the top 8 or even the top 4 in the women's singles event."
The article notes: "就讀台北市立大同高中國中部三年級的李子晴與鄧淳薰,從小就是羽球女雙搭檔,展現出超齡的實力與擊球威力,她們先在今年1月舉行的第1次全國排名賽勇奪乙組第一與甲組門票,轉戰台東全中運更是勢如破竹,1局未失登上后座。 ... 兩人球路與個性互補,李子晴個性大方,鄧淳薰則較為內向,在球場上也是李子晴較為主動,鄧淳薰則以補攻為主,成為絕佳拍檔,她們本次不斷打下國中女雙金牌,也率隊打下女團金牌,一舉進帳兩金。"
From Google Translate: "Li Ziqing and Deng Chunxun, who are in the third grade of Taipei Municipal Datong High School, have been a badminton women's doubles partner since childhood. They showed their strength and hitting power beyond their years. They first won the Group B in the first national ranking tournament held in January this year. First and Group A tickets, the move to the Taitung All-China Games was even more impressive, without losing a single game. ... The two players have complementary skills and personalities. Li Ziqing has a generous personality, while Deng Chunxun is more introverted. Li Ziqing is more proactive on the court, while Deng Chunxun focuses on making up the offense. They have become an excellent partner. They have continuously won gold medals in the junior high school women's doubles this time. , also led the team to win the women's team gold medal, winning two gold medals in one fell swoop."
The article notes: "新冠疫情後要留給有準備好的人,很明顯,來自中租的「馨薰配」李佳馨/鄧淳薰組合準備的非常充足,「馨薰配」今在全運羽球女雙金牌戰的北市內戰中再以直落二(21:8、21:15)打敗吳玓蓉/程郁捷奪金,疫情後已連15勝包辦全排、全大運和全運三冠,儼然已經是台灣新一代最強女雙。... 「馨薰配」中的鄧淳薰今年更是首度參加全運就順利摘金而回"
From Google Translate: "After the COVID-19 pandemic, it must be left to those who are prepared. It is obvious that the "Xin–Xun pair" Li Jiaxin/Deng Chunxun combination from Chailease is very well prepared. The "Xin–Xun pair" is currently playing badminton in the National Games In the women's doubles gold medal match in Beishi Civil War, they defeated Wu Zhenrong/Cheng Yujie in straight games (21:8, 21:15) to win the gold medal. After the pandemic, they have won 15 consecutive victories to win the three championships of the National Parade, Universiade and National Games. It seems that they have already won the gold medal. They are the strongest women's doubles team of Taiwan's new generation. ... Deng Chunxun in the "Xin–Xun Pair" participated in the National Games for the first time this year and successfully won the gold medal."
The article notes: "從小學就搭檔至今的北市大同女雙鄧淳薰/李子晴,19日準決賽先以22:20、21:11擊敗自家姐妹孫妏沛/陳奕璇,再於決賽以21:12、21:16取勝南市永康梁家微/鄭育沛,贏得她們國中生涯首座全國大賽后冠。身為大會第1種子的鄧李配,不僅首輪輪空,且場場快速解決對手,堪稱這次女雙最強拍檔 ... 今年全中運屈居第四的鄧李配,賽後鄧淳薰哭的像是淚人兒般,本屆國中盃終於一嚐摘冠心願"
From Google Translate: "Beishi Datong Women's Doubles Deng Chunxun/Li Ziqing, who have been partners since elementary school, first defeated their sisters Sun Yupei/Chen Yixuan in the semi-finals on the 19th 22:20, 21:11, and then defeated Nanshi Yongkang in the final 21:12, 21:16 Liang Jiawei/Zheng Yupei won the first national championship in their junior high school career. ... As the No. 1 seed in the conference, Deng and Li Pei not only received a bye in the first round, but also quickly defeated their opponents in every game. They can be called the strongest partner in women's doubles this time. ... Deng and Li Pei, who finished fourth in the National Games this year, cried like tears after the game. This year's Junior High School Cup finally got a chance to win the championship."
The article notes: "北市大同高2女雙鄧淳薰/李子晴與高雄中學3年級鄭育沛/梁家溦在冠軍戰演出「自家姊妹」對決戲碼,最終鄧李配技高一籌,花費35分鐘以21:16、21:19拿下比賽,也獲兩人搭配以來在國際成人賽第一冠。"
From Google Translate: "The second-year girls' doubles team of Datong High School in Peking City, Deng Chunxun/Li Ziqing, and Kaohsiung Middle School third-graders Zheng Yupei/Liang Jiaman performed a "sister" showdown in the championship match. In the end, Deng and Li were superior in supporting skills and won in 35 minutes with 21:16, 21:19. In the competition, they also won the first international adult championship since the two teamed up."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 16:31, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
A dump of a 1000 names. Strongly fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Names are even in Cyrillic, so not readable for most readers of an encyclopedia that uses a Latin alphabet. I am also nominating:
The result was merge to Tire-pressure monitoring system. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not the Federal Register. There are a large number of articles like this one which should also be evaluated for notability, I encountered this article through New Page Patrol. No secondary coverage present. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
He doesn't seem to meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Working actors, but not the significance of roles needed. Also currently an unref BLP. Boleyn ( talk) 15:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Articles that have been proposed for deletion are ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:48, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability, the one reliable source Is the one referenced on the page which makes it clear the charter refering to the abbey having been built is probably fraudulent. I can find no other historical source that references any abbey existing in Bradfield. Tim Landy ( talk) 15:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:N
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:48, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
no notability, created by blocked paid editor. Testeraccount100 ( talk) 15:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized ("Malvankar's unwavering commitment and strategic vision have positioned him as a catalyst for positive transformation in Goa's political landscape")
WP:BLP of a political figure, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NPOL. The main notability claim here is that he's the leader of the youth chapter of a state-level political party, which is not an "inherently" notable role -- it could get him into Wikipedia if he were shown to pass
WP:GNG, but does not automatically entitle him to a guaranteed inclusion freebie just because he exists.
But the referencing here is not getting him over GNG: it's referenced to one
primary source, one glancing namecheck of his existence as a provider of soundbite in an article about something else, and one article that doesn't even mention his name at all, and appears to be here just to tangentially verify that the political party he works for exists, none of which is support for his standalone notability as an individual at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Notability. Single ref makes no mention of this being a chain. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to No. 659 Squadron RAF. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 17:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The article has almost no information not included in either No. 659 Squadron RAF or 1 Regiment Army Air Corps. PercyPigUK ( talk) 14:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The 4 sources are from the time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. Also no deaths reported so WP:NOTNEWS also applies. Also oppose merging with any terrorism article as it is not clear this event was terrorism. LibStar ( talk) 09:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The 9 sources are from the time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 09:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer, not
properly sourced as passing
WP:AUTHOR. The main notability claim on offer here is that her work exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient coverage and analysis about her work to get her over
WP:GNG -- but the only reference cited here is a
primary source that isn't support for notability at all.
As I don't read Swedish, I'm perfectly willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to archived Swedish media coverage than I've got can find enough to salvage it -- but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The next few months will likely provide more clarity regarding lasting notability as a standalone event. Owen× ☎ 21:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. Insignificant, one off airstrike among hundreds, if not thousands of airstrikes in the span of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Ecrusized ( talk) 18:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Before 2017, secondary schools were assumed notable unless sources could not be found to prove existence, but following a February 2017 RFC, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist, and are still subject both to the standards of notability, as well as those for organizations.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: An analysis of sources per WP:GNG would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 13:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. While it could be argued that this discussion should be closed as No consensus I find the new accounts who popped up to argue for Deletion more than a little suspicious. AFD is not a place that new editors find on their first few days editing. Plus those editors arguing to Keep this article are AFD regulars I trust. Liz Read! Talk! 06:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:NACTOR. None of the cited sources are considered reliable. I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject to meet WP:ENT/ WP:GNG— Preceding unsigned comment added by Raqib Sheikh ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus currently seems split between redirect and delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 13:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Advert of non-notable (only trivial coverage) website. Flounder fillet ( talk) 12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Biography of subject that doesn't meet WP:NBIO or WP:MUSICBIO or other criteria. (Article was created, seemingly, by a family member. And relies entirely on sources written by family members. Was speedy deleted in 2007. Was restored, after request from creator, shortly afterwards - on the basis that notability might be established by "news reports" and having a music retreat "named for him". However, the only news report mentioned (which doesn't appear to be verifiable) seems to be about the music retreat. Rather than the subject. And while it is a credit to the man/family/community that the event was so-named, it doesn't establish notability. Even if the event was notable (and I would question whether it is), notability isn't transferrable.) My own WP:BEFORE has returned nothing to indicate that NBIO or SIGCOV are met. WP:COI and WP:NOTMEMORIAL are also relevant. Guliolopez ( talk) 13:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUMS, unable to find any reliable sources for the mixtape. Only able to find something about The YS Collection compilation, which is not this mixtape. I found this review from Sputnikmusic, but it only critiques the mixtape and offers no further insight to the mixtape apart from surface-level coverage. Regardless, one source isn't enough for notability. Locust member ( talk) 13:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
As the subject of the article is an unincorporated community with a population of just 26 with no notable details listed about it beyond it being named after William H. Seward, it does not appear to be sufficiently notable to have an article of its own. CoolieCoolster ( talk) 12:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Legacy of Roberto Clemente. And/or to Louisville Slugger Museum & Factory, whichever interested editors prefer. Sandstein 19:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable statue. And I don't know how relevant this is but the location is also not significant to the baseball player who is depicted. Omnis Scientia ( talk) 10:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years and WP:NOTPLOT. Could redirect to List of Catch-22 characters as AtD JMWt ( talk) 09:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Previously deleted and salted at House of Hiranandani. This is not quite substantially identical to the deleted version, but I see no new in-depth sources to establish notability * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested draftification (essentially copy/pasted back from Draft:Michael Lahyani). Borderline A7/G11 IMO, no real coverage beyond the standard SPIP. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 14:32, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:46, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under SNG or GNG. Previously deleted. Regarding real world notability the strongest two things are that he was the father of the President of the Maldives and he won a "National Award of Honor" for" for "contribution in the area of religious awareness and religious education". Of the references, two are short obit descriptions, one lists the award recipients (with no other text) and the rest don't cover him. North8000 ( talk) 14:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:47, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
No in-depth coverage on the internet, nearly unsourced advertisement. Flounder fillet ( talk) 12:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 09:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about an actor, and added a reference to his employer's website; but cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources, and do not think he meets WP:NACTOR. Tacyarg ( talk) 13:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to improve this article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Zero inline sources in entire article, no evidence of significant notability online. The article is of significant length, but there are few sources and none inline. 2003 LN 6 05:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. While eBay is obviously notable, it's not clear that its API is. The article itself is extremely support with little more than a feature list, and the only sources are eBay itself. I would suggest merging into eBay but its really not obvious what the notability of this is--lots of websites have APIs. TheRealOj32 ( talk) 06:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NORG. The sources are all paid PRs. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 06:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP a before finds no significant coverage in independent sources, the article has only primary sources, seems like there is nothing else. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Newbern, Alabama. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Falls clearly within WP:SINGLEEVENT. Braxton is notable only for one event - the controversy over his mayoral election. He is not even notable for being mayor, as he has done nothing significant in his capacity as mayor (likely due to the controversy), and the position of mayor of this tiny town is not itself notable. The controversy is currently covered in the Newbern, Alabama, article, which is the appropriate place for that. There is no need to have this separate article whose subject is not notable. Ergo Sum 03:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
On point (1) the nom is correct. Reliable sources only cover the subject with respect to this event. It is a BLP1E. On (2) I am unconvinced. It appears likely that the town will be forced to hold elections and the subject could win such elections, and that this would be notable and covered widely. That is speculation at this stage and WP:TOOSOON applies, but I don't think it is likely they will return to a low profile. On (3) the event is, in fact, quite significant, and is already reasonably well documented, although largely in primay sources.So I think coverage of this is due. But the nom. also correctly points out it is covered in the Newbern, Alabama page. It should be there, but the case is significant enough and notable enough that I think, per WP:PAGEDECIDE, there is a good case for a spinout page that discusses this in particular. People will be referring to this event for some time to come, and although it is again TOOSOON to judge the lasting impact, it is likely to be covered in secondary sources as a notable event in its own right. So I find that some article just on the event is due. The only remaining question is whether it is due as a BLP or due as an article on the event. If the latter, this article should be moved and covered as an article on the event and not as a BLP. This is in line with other BLP1Es, e.g. Lucia de Berk case. Note also arm 2 of BLP1E actually suggest merging with an article on the event, such an article being assumed. However that discussion need not be at AfD. An RM could be opened on the page instead. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 09:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)1. Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event.
2. The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article.
3. The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant, and his role was both substantial and well documented.
Its coverage has been almost entirely by local sources that likely would not qualify as RS.A quick google of the name reveals that in addition to the UK's Guardian source on the page, it is also covered in the Daily Mail (we all know what we think about that one - but note it is a right wing source), ABC News, CNN, CBS, the Wall Street Journal etc. All of these are news sources, and reporting is generally a primary source but they are all (other than the Daily Mail) reliable sources. Then we have sources like the Equal Justice Initiative [11] and many similar. Also additional information, e.g. [12] - Law & Crime. Again, we are close to the event, and that is always problematic in separating secondary sources from primary, but there is a lot of coverage of this and it is worldwide. It is simply not true that this is entirely local sources. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
There are no references in the article and I can't find any reliable sources online covering the band. XabqEfdg ( talk) 01:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:13, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) as " G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". (non-admin closure) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NORG. Appears to be a promo article for a secondary school for children of military personnel, mainly unsourced. BEFORE found promo, listings, routine mill news, nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 05:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's a lot of discussion, but the "delete" opinions carry the day. In terms of numbers, they're in a relatively substantial majority, 5 to 2 (plus one neutral and draftify each). In terms of arguments, if as here notability is the key issue, a "keep" minority can only prevent deletion by making a compelling policy-based argument for inclusion - i.e., references to the kind of in-depth, independent, reliable coverage that GNG requires. Here, this is not the case.
As regards draftification, an ATD also proposed, there is neither consensus for it nor do I think it would be useful - we draftify stuff if there are reasonable prospects of improvement, but here it seems that three weeks of newspaper archive searches have uncovered most if not all that has been written about the subject. Regardless, if new sources are discoverd, draftification is still possible via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 19:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Being a member of the nobility does not equate to notability. Sources show that he lived , that he had a family and worked as a coutier to a minor royal and that he died, but nothing beyond that. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 08:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not all knighthoods are equal.Indeed. KCVO is two levels above Knight Bachelor, the lowest level of knighthood! Essentially claiming it's not a real knighthood is purely your POV. Claiming his notability is inherited is patently ridiculous. He isn't notable for being married to someone notable; he received his knighthood for his achievements and service just like any other knight.
Anyone appointed equerry to Beatrice would have received this title, irrespective of what they did.No they wouldn't. He was her comptroller and treasurer, the head of her household, not just her equerry. Like it or not, these people held highly influential and notable positions in the United Kingdom, hence their knighthoods. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
obviously being "selected" for inclusion in an unreliable source counts for absolutely nothing. Yup, obviously someone else who hasn't actually bothered to take in what they're citing. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 14:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 05:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
does not guarantee that a subject should be included. Rupples ( talk) 16:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability– the many mentions of him and coverage across years of his life, as well as the nation-wide coverage of his death (some of which has some depth and could be considered sigcov imo, e.g. [14]), proves that this satisfies it. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:34, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability? There seems to be a pretty fair case for this passing ANYBIO as well. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability); not to mention some sources that could be argued as SIGCOV and a pass of ANYBIO (which needs to hold some weight). BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
It is noted in the discussion above that sources are primary and that coverage of the subject is not significant. You point to one source (paywalled) which tells us of his death, confirms he was Gentleman-in-Waiting to princess Beatrice while in Spain and appointed an Equerry and then treasurer of the Household. We learn he was educated at Eton, the names of his parents and died 3 days after a serious operation. Is that SIGCOV? Well it's something. Reliable yes, secondary and independent? Well the notice was probably placed there and it is a report of death. It is not great, but even if we accepted it, it is still not multiple. I am not seeing an NBASIC pass here. But a source analysis is welcome. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, which is what we have here (and I'll note that the obit I referenced is 164 words; that's SIGCOV IMO for a subject like this). The Burke's Peerage source may be primary (?), but the many newspaper refs absolutely can count towards NBASIC, given that they allow us to develop a reasonable portrait of his life, and considering that they do and that we have someone who passes WP:ANYBIO with an honor no subject has ever been deleted while possessing ... this should be kept. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 16:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 17:33, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Term was coined by Stewart Udall in his book 'Quiet Crisis' and seems to be restricted to that and then article was heavily beset by WP:OR and lacking ins sources outside of original research. I believe that the content that remains would find a better home on the Stewart Udall page itself as a subsection or as a brief mention beside his published works. Iljhgtn ( talk) 04:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
POV fork of [15] backed entirely by self published obsolete sources. Creator was recently blocked for socking. Ratnahastin ( talk) 03:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Content of article has been significantly expanded since previous nom but no citations have been added that demonstrate WP:NSCHOOL has been met. Since the previous AfD closed as draftify the article creator has moved it to mainspace twice without addressing or discussing the notability issue. Triptothecottage ( talk) 05:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the history, I would like a stronger consensus. Should that end up in delete/draftify, a promise to respect consensus would also be ideal.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi 03:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I was considering a Merge but we have an editor objecting to a Merge so I'll close as Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Already mentioned in similar page of Afghanistan-Pakistan border skirmishes, page isn't distinguishable for WP:GNG and is mostly background information rather then any relevant information about a major invasion.
The sources are also extremely lacking/poor, many being blog sites. Noorullah ( talk) 23:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student award. Broc ( talk) 06:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football in Wallis and Futuna. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
No citations, all the blue links are redirects or links to cities/towns on the islands. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 02:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP, No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The article says that he was a radio announcer. The on-line source had only a brief listing of him. Was not able to review the other 2 sources; they are off line Azerbaijani sources. (one appeared to be on line but that was just a link to a Wikipedia article about the source in general.) but content is indicative of them not being GNG sources. North8000 ( talk) 02:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This article was created by the same user who created Singapore at the 2026 Asian Games and Vietnam at the 2026 Asian Games. As was said by CycloneYoris, it is still too early for this article and the accompanying articles to exist. Flemmish Nietzsche ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)