Archives

Archive 1

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 09:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi respected user Materialscientist, learned that I did the mistake of removing the belligerent. Now that i have found my mistake i would try not to repeat it again and edit the page and add citations to the infobox results. Rahim231 ( talk) 15:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Operation Searchlight, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of wars involving Pakistan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. [1]  //  Timothy ::  talk  17:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I have added back material at List of wars involving Pakistan, with Citing reliable sources used in the Main articles from where the conflict was taken, as per requested by the Respected User Timothy. Rahim231 ( talk) 17:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at List of wars involving Pakistan, you may be blocked from editing. [2]  //  Timothy ::  talk  17:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Dear user i couldnt figure out what templates which were removed, might've been by mistake or so, it would be a kind gesture if you would let me know intead of reporting me. Rahim231 ( talk) 17:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You are clearly ignoring edit summaries, comments on the talk page and continue to add in material that does not meet the article inclusion criteria. This needs to stop. If you continue to add material that does not meet the article inclusion criteria - a list of wars - no incidents, or battles, but wars - you may be block from editing.  //  Timothy ::  talk  19:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Examples:

• This is not a war [3]. No sources indicate this was a war. This was a fight against insurgents, not a war.
• This is not a war [4]. No sources indicate this was a war.
• This is not a war [5]. No sources indicate this was a war.
• This is not a war [6]. No sources indicate this was a war.
• This is not a war [7]. No sources indicate this was a war.

Read the article criteria.  //  Timothy ::  talk  19:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rahim231. Thank you for your work on Sack of Pakistani consulates in Afghanistan 1955. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for reviewing the article i created, Have a blessed day you to dear friend.

~~~~ Rahim231 ( talk) 16:19, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Outline of Pakistan military history

added links pointing to BLA, BLF, BNA and BRA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello Rahim231 and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{ WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
• If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 12:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hunza–Nagar Campaign, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chinese and Lashkar.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. I noticed you're very active on the article: List of wars involving Pakistan.

I wanted to mention that Pakistan provided diplomatic support to Azerbaijan during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh war, and it mentions as such in the Armenia-Pakistan relations page, with sources. It's worth mentioning.

Since the Korean war (where Pakistan provided mostly diplomatic aid) was added to the list, I assume the same can be done for the Second Nagorno-Karabakh war. I'd edit it myself, but I'm not too experienced with wikipedia.

Anyways, keep up the good work. OperativePhase33 ( talk) 00:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi there, yes it is true that pakistan provided diplomatic support but also to noted the financial support in korean war although it denied to send troops, but the other form of support was such that it cannot be ignored.

However for Second nargono-karbakh war, there is all sorts of diplomatic support but there is no clear statement by pakistani military or political leadership for pakistani military involvement or arms sales, instead there are allegations or claims for pakistani support by armenian prime minister and some journalists claiming it with videos of JF-17 [8] The Government has rejected claims of any military support for the time. [9] [10]

If you have any valuable sources for pakistani support kindly mention it here in Talk:Second Nagorno-Karabakh War to discuss the involvement with other editors and then after with agreement Pakistan can be added as a beligerent and then later in the war list.

if you need help with editing you can fee free to ask questions here on Wikipedia:Teahouse.

Thank you. Rahim231 ( talk) 08:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of wars involving the United States into List of wars involving Pakistan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I have done it here, it should be done just like this right ? Talk:List of wars involving Pakistan. Rahim231 ( talk) 09:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

No, that is not right. The attribution is done via an edit summary at the destination article at the time you copy the content. If you forget, please do it in a subsequent edit summary. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Done it in the Page summary. Rahim231 ( talk) 09:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Lakki Marwat operation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 Lakki Marwat operation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rahim231. Thank you for your work on Battle of Pandu. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice on your new article. I would recommend including it in appropriate Wikiprojects, and adding appropriate categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun ^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Rahim231 ( talk) 12:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing this page. reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Pandu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I have reassessed the article as B class. However, it would be easier for the reader to follow if you change "opposing forces" and "enemy" to Indian forces and Pakistani forces as appropriate. I appreciate your effort to vary the term occasionally but it makes it more difficult to keep track of the parties. The reader would also have to keep track of which units belonged to each army in those cases. Thanks for the comprehensive article. Donner60 ( talk) 07:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reviewing the article, Sure i will change it shortly to Indian forces instead of enenmy or opposing forces. Rahim231 ( talk) 06:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Someone may assess this for military history before I do. I tend to think this is only within the scope of the other projects listed on the talk page. I will look into this further and make a few inquiries before I decide. As I noted, someone else may assess it first. If they are a coordinator or experienced user, I will not look at it further. I only leave you this message because I have ended up doing many of the assessments recently. I assessed one of your articles a few days ago. I try to be as prompt as I can but this one could be delayed for a short time if I do it. Thanks for your work in this area. Donner60 ( talk) 19:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I have left this message on the assessment talk page: After a few copy edits to the last section and deletion of the Aviation project and Aviation task force, I have assessed the article as B class, as I note on the assessment page. However, I will give further consideration and pose the question to coordinators as to whether this is really a military history subject or should only be under Crime and Terrorism projects (without changing the B class rating).

Also your signature appears to be placed manually without links to this talk page. Please use 4 tildes as your signature so that it is properly displayed. Thank you. Donner60 ( talk) 07:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for asessesing the article, what i know is that this attack is part of the ongiong insurgency in Kpk and Operation Radd-ul-Fasaad in which the militants affliated to the TTP conducted these attacks, by considering that it does place it in military section.

Sorry i didn't notice the talk page error I'll fix that. Rahim231 ( talk) 18:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Battle of Pandu has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I did not intentionally write in the exact same words, i took the excerpt from the Raja Muhammad Sarwar page. Rahim231 ( talk) 14:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license, and helps prevent mistakes such as mine. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from one Wikipedia article to another in the future. — Diannaa ( talk) 21:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Assalamualaikum brother,I don't know how to add in list format, so I'm seeking help from you some wars not mentioned in the list include

• Waziristan rebellion of 1948-1954
• Pashtunistan conflict
• Sri Lanka civil war
• MQM Militancy
• Bosnian war
• North Yemen Civil War
• Rann of Kutch conflict
• Red Sea crisis
• Siachen conflict

I'll list more when I find Waleed Ukranian ( talk) 15:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Walikum-musalam brother, no worries im trying my best to add wars to the list and then get its quality assessed. there are alot of wars which aren't included just like the dhofar war in which Pakistan helped Oman. I will add these wars soon with citations.

Also another thing i have seen your recent edits and pages you have created and i commend your contributions, it would be great if you complete the article and raise their quality. thanks Rahim231 ( talk) 15:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks brother moreover Afghan Civil War (1996–2001) also has Pakistani involvement Waleed Ukranian ( talk) 15:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Rahim231 Brother assalamualaikum some more wars involving Pakistan are first JVP insurrection, Rohingya conflict, second JVP insurrection, second Libyan civil war, first and second MQM insurrections M Waleed ( talk) 16:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

The thing is actually that there are alot of conflicts and adding them to the war list takes some time and research, And i have been studying these wars such as the Sri-lankan and Afghan civil wars. I will slowly add these to avoid mistakes. Also in addition to my exams coming up i will be less active but still i will add some wars before i become less active for 2 weeks. Thanks for pointing these wars out, Although i dont think MQM insurrection would be a war, its page is not not much developed and given attention, it does not even contain a infobox. Rahim231 ( talk) 04:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Brother assalamualaikum,actually MQM insurrection has the following articles

• MQM insurrection (1978-1992)
• Operation Clean-up
• MQM insurrection (1994-present)

And all those have infoboxes, anyways thanks for your contributions and I'll wait M Waleed ( talk) 13:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 ( talk) 19:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rahim231. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sack of Bhatner fort (1398), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rahim231. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Jassar Bridge (1965), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply