 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
I found your restoration of BLP-violating content at Burjor Avari surprising given your tenure and knowledge of policy. I know that you're aware aware of the requirement for such content to be supported by reliable sources, so please include your sources if you intend to restore it. Thank you, -- Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source for the Arvind Kejriwal article?- Haani40 ( talk) 02:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- It was used in this edit.- Haani40 ( talk) 02:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Newspapers are perfectly fine for current affairs. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 02:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
How to change my user name slightly (I just want to change 40 to 39)? Will I lose my extended confirmed user rights if I do so?- Haani40 ( talk) 07:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- i would advise against it, because it would confuse people who are just about getting to know you. If there are strong reasons why you have to do it, please ask at WP:Teahouse. (I used to know it some time, but it was a long time ago.)
- Congratulations on getting extended confirmed! But this also means that you cannot be considered a "new user" any more. You need to edit responsibly in contentious areas. If not, you can be taken to WP:ARE. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- ( talk page stalker) @ Haani40, please read the Changing Username information page. It includes a link to where you'll need to make the request. You should not lose the EC rights on a rename. Ravensfire ( talk) 15:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
I see that there is no mention of the Maratha Empire in the article about India (neither in the lead nor in the History section) but the lead of the Maratha Empire article reads,
The Maratha Kingdom was expanded into a full-fledged Empire in the 18th Century under the leadership of Peshwa Bajirao I. [note 1]
- so should we not mention that India was ruled by the Marathas and that the English East India Company seized control of Bengal in the Battle of Plassey and then defeated the Marathas in the second and third Anglo-Maratha wars and established Company rule in India?- Haani40 ( talk) 16:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- The
India page is not expected to contain a comprehensive coverage of history. For that, there is a path on
History of India. Any change to the
India article requires
WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page, because it is a Featured Article. --
Kautilya3 (
talk) 17:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the, "
Maratha Empire" sub-section of the, "Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE)" section of the
History of India article, it says,
- so should that not be mentioned in the lead of that article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The Marathas are credited to a large extent for ending Mughal rule in India. [3] [4] [5]
- In the, "
Maratha Empire" sub-section of the, "Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE)" section of the
History of India article, it says,
References
- ^ Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpavans: Social Ascendancy of a Creative Minority in Maharashtra, 1818–1918. Shubhi Publications. p. 82. ISBN 978-81-8290-132-2.
- ^ Gordon, Stewart (2007-02-01). The Marathas 1600–1818. Cambridge University Press. pp. 120–131. ISBN 978-0-521-03316-9.
- ^ Pearson, M.N. (February 1976). "Shivaji and the Decline of the Mughal Empire". The Journal of Asian Studies. 35 (2): 221–235. doi: 10.2307/2053980. JSTOR 2053980. S2CID 162482005.
- ^ Capper, J. (1918). Delhi, the Capital of India. Asian Educational Services. p. 28. ISBN 978-81-206-1282-2. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
- ^ Sen, S.N. (2010). An Advanced History of Modern India. Macmillan India. p. 1941. ISBN 978-0-230-32885-3. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
WP:IN
I think you should mention the edit wars or proposed, "Request for Comments" going on in the Aksai Chin, Jammu and Kashmir (princely state), Sino-Indian border dispute and India articles at WP:IN.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I added a sentence
here at the
RSN Singh article. Now to that sentence if I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat as he received money from the Ford Foundation
" will it be a
WP:BLP violation?-
Haani40 (
talk) 05:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat. (without mentioning the Ford Foundation)" it may be more acceptable.- Haani40 ( talk) 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it would be a major WP:BLP violation. In fact, that page is already terrible, because it has practically no biographical information about RSN Singh himself. The primary purpose of that page is to write about RSN Singh, not to reproduce his views. Wikipedia cannot be a mouthpiece for RSN Singh. We can only include information from WP:SECONDARY sources that write about him. To write anything about his books, you need to find book reviews regarding those books, and you need to summarise them fairly without WP:CHERRYPICKING. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Have a look at these changes. May be a case of POV. Skimming through I've seen atleast one instance of WP:OR in the second para - Bhutan and North Bengal are not mentioned in the accompanying source, Secondly the map [1] used doesn't have sources. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
![[1]](/info/en/?search=File:Wesea.png){kind=link}
Nomination of Islam in South Asia for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in South Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Users123users ( talk) 13:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Notice about discussion at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
This is the link.-
Haani40 (
talk) 21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Hello, you can find the sector distribution among the infographics. I will make sure to use a better link Ly.n0m ( talk) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the
help page).
|
| This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
|
Index
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 |
I found your restoration of BLP-violating content at Burjor Avari surprising given your tenure and knowledge of policy. I know that you're aware aware of the requirement for such content to be supported by reliable sources, so please include your sources if you intend to restore it. Thank you, -- Ponyo bons mots 19:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this a reliable source for the Arvind Kejriwal article?- Haani40 ( talk) 02:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- It was used in this edit.- Haani40 ( talk) 02:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Newspapers are perfectly fine for current affairs. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 02:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
How to change my user name slightly (I just want to change 40 to 39)? Will I lose my extended confirmed user rights if I do so?- Haani40 ( talk) 07:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- i would advise against it, because it would confuse people who are just about getting to know you. If there are strong reasons why you have to do it, please ask at WP:Teahouse. (I used to know it some time, but it was a long time ago.)
- Congratulations on getting extended confirmed! But this also means that you cannot be considered a "new user" any more. You need to edit responsibly in contentious areas. If not, you can be taken to WP:ARE. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- ( talk page stalker) @ Haani40, please read the Changing Username information page. It includes a link to where you'll need to make the request. You should not lose the EC rights on a rename. Ravensfire ( talk) 15:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
I see that there is no mention of the Maratha Empire in the article about India (neither in the lead nor in the History section) but the lead of the Maratha Empire article reads,
The Maratha Kingdom was expanded into a full-fledged Empire in the 18th Century under the leadership of Peshwa Bajirao I. [note 1]
- so should we not mention that India was ruled by the Marathas and that the English East India Company seized control of Bengal in the Battle of Plassey and then defeated the Marathas in the second and third Anglo-Maratha wars and established Company rule in India?- Haani40 ( talk) 16:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- The
India page is not expected to contain a comprehensive coverage of history. For that, there is a path on
History of India. Any change to the
India article requires
WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page, because it is a Featured Article. --
Kautilya3 (
talk) 17:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the, "
Maratha Empire" sub-section of the, "Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE)" section of the
History of India article, it says,
- so should that not be mentioned in the lead of that article?- Haani40 ( talk) 17:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)The Marathas are credited to a large extent for ending Mughal rule in India. [3] [4] [5]
- In the, "
Maratha Empire" sub-section of the, "Early modern period (c. 1526–1858 CE)" section of the
History of India article, it says,
References
- ^ Gokhale, Sandhya (2008). The Chitpavans: Social Ascendancy of a Creative Minority in Maharashtra, 1818–1918. Shubhi Publications. p. 82. ISBN 978-81-8290-132-2.
- ^ Gordon, Stewart (2007-02-01). The Marathas 1600–1818. Cambridge University Press. pp. 120–131. ISBN 978-0-521-03316-9.
- ^ Pearson, M.N. (February 1976). "Shivaji and the Decline of the Mughal Empire". The Journal of Asian Studies. 35 (2): 221–235. doi: 10.2307/2053980. JSTOR 2053980. S2CID 162482005.
- ^ Capper, J. (1918). Delhi, the Capital of India. Asian Educational Services. p. 28. ISBN 978-81-206-1282-2. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
- ^ Sen, S.N. (2010). An Advanced History of Modern India. Macmillan India. p. 1941. ISBN 978-0-230-32885-3. Retrieved 6 January 2017.
WP:IN
I think you should mention the edit wars or proposed, "Request for Comments" going on in the Aksai Chin, Jammu and Kashmir (princely state), Sino-Indian border dispute and India articles at WP:IN.- Haani40 ( talk) 15:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
I added a sentence
here at the
RSN Singh article. Now to that sentence if I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat as he received money from the Ford Foundation
" will it be a
WP:BLP violation?-
Haani40 (
talk) 05:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I add, "..... in which he alleges that the CM of Delhi is a security threat. (without mentioning the Ford Foundation)" it may be more acceptable.- Haani40 ( talk) 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it would be a major WP:BLP violation. In fact, that page is already terrible, because it has practically no biographical information about RSN Singh himself. The primary purpose of that page is to write about RSN Singh, not to reproduce his views. Wikipedia cannot be a mouthpiece for RSN Singh. We can only include information from WP:SECONDARY sources that write about him. To write anything about his books, you need to find book reviews regarding those books, and you need to summarise them fairly without WP:CHERRYPICKING. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Have a look at these changes. May be a case of POV. Skimming through I've seen atleast one instance of WP:OR in the second para - Bhutan and North Bengal are not mentioned in the accompanying source, Secondly the map [1] used doesn't have sources. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Islam in South Asia for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in South Asia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Users123users ( talk) 13:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Notice about discussion at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
This is the link.-
Haani40 (
talk) 21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.
Hello, you can find the sector distribution among the infographics. I will make sure to use a better link Ly.n0m ( talk) 01:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging
Category:Sikh monarchs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 12:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the
help page).