This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Dear Ponyo, can you deleted Draft:The Smurfs Movie and Draft:The Pagemaster, when I check it this is fake. There this the link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Smurfs_Movie https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Pagemaster_(film) 142.122.25.19 ( talk) 14:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Nice to see you back. In the hope that you will come in later today, could you check Dekhoaayadon against PH? I see a couple of non-stale socks, Kraistag and Scheditia, the former of which was confirmed. There is article intersection between the new account and other socks - the one I've seen most often is IAmAnEditor008. Regardless of anything else, Dekhoaayadon is a suspicious new user, created on March 16, and launching a meritorious SPI, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dunki2024, on March 27; the fact that it was well-presented and had merit makes it more suspicious.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
My watchlist is littered with your archivals of SPIs. Trying to beat the record of x many archivals in y minutes? Bored? Decided to clerk because the actual clerks aren't? I had no idea I had that many SPIs on my watchlist. Now if you could just clear the CU and open backlogs ... -- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you undo the revisions by Hawalul212:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1193416148
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1190907996
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1189591573
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1189591420 148.135.176.37 ( talk) 12:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I always appreciate your actions.
However.. sorry but, Is it impossible to take action against IPs?
Once DENOSIO's accounts are blocked, they continue to attack via IP.
I reported it to SPI, but no one resolves it.
Is there no way to take action against IPs that damage WIKI..?
Thanks. Lades2222 ( talk) 11:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Are we currenlty experiencing an example of this in action? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I've blocked MyUserPage as another sock of What is this username?, per WP:DUCK. I didn't do all the bellls and whistles, but you may want to CU to confirm. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Now that's a band I'd love to join. Drmies ( talk) 20:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate you working your admin magic on my talk page. That being said, I would be interested in connecting with that banned user off-Wiki so I can communicate with him without being in violation of the policies myself. I don't like obviously that he is committing so much vandalism, but I know it is out of boredom from what he has said and he honestly seems like a nice person, maybe just a little misguided.
I guess my perspective is that I'm not going to commit any vandalism (in fact my record shows quite the opposite), so I don't see the harm in it and maybe in fact it would be a welcome distraction--I have been in contact with other banned users before like User:Meepsheep and it never affected my conduct. Is there anyway I could maybe point him to one of my emails (maybe one not directly associated with my real name) so he can chat with me without it being disruptive? If that would be a violation too of Wikipedia policies, I will not, but I am just curious what leeway I have here. Thebirdlover ( talk) 20:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. Regarding my reverted edit 1218545167 on April 12 for the birth date of Ainsley Earhardt, I was wondering why Hollywood Life is not considered a RS. Its wikiarticle reads, “The site covers celebrity, fashion, beauty, women issues, and entertainment news.” While it doesn’t appear on the RSP list, I can’t find where it has been depreciated or noted as having inaccuracies or a failure of editorial oversight. Is there a RfC for it? Although it may not publish what some would consider “hard” news, it does cover news in its bailiwick. I realize we must comply with DOB but I don’t know of Ainsley Earhardt complaining about inclusion of her date of birth, I don’t know that the edit is contentious material, Hollywood Life is popular enough that it may reasonably be inferred that Earhardt does not object, and a simple Google search brings up her DOB top, front, and center. Your thoughts on this matter will be appreciated. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem ( talk) 03:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Ponyo,
We have an editor with a little quirk that I wanted to check in with you about and they have had this habit for years now. Every few weeks, about once a month, DinosaursLoveExistence uses their registered account to create a large number of empty categories in really random subject areas but often specific to the UK. And then, after the categories are created, a few days later, they log out and use IP accounts, like User:92.27.37.191 to fill these empty categories. Over the years, I've left probably a dozen messages, on their registered account's talk page and on the IP accounts' talk pages, simply asking them to log in to do all of their editing with their registered account but this habit has persisted for going on years now. I don't want to be a stickler for bureaucracy but as a checkuser, is there anything wrong with this behavior? Their only interest is in creating these large groups of categories and then filling them up a week later so there is no vandalism going on but they have never communicated except occasionally through edit summaries, no talk page responses at all that I have seen over the past few years.
I'm coming to you because I don't know if there is any policy about boomeranging between logged in editing and then logging out to edit, seemingly to do different kinds of tasks. They are unresponsive so I can't get any answer to my queries over the years. The only problem that exists is me tagging dozens of empty categories and then, four or five days later, untagging these categories because they are no longer empty so it's kind of a PITA. But given their lack of explanation, I can see this continuing, indefinitely and thought I'd check in with someone who regularly looks into account data. It's really just bad for them as it reveals their location but they have been alerted to this fact multiple times and they don't seem to care. Any way, I don't want to be looking for problems that aren't there but I thought I'd inquire with you. Thank you in advance for any insight you can provide with this editor's unusual behavior. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Noticed your WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Bmusique99 filing and took at look the sockpuppet's log out of curiosity. What in the world is "reviewed an image suggestion"? I have never seen that before. S0091 ( talk) 20:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I wondered about them a while ago. Thanks for figuring it out.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I request that you update the infobox image of Nelly Furtado, to a more recent one as Furtado's appearance has since changed, and because it is more consistent with articles on other celebrities. 70.50.199.125 ( talk) 03:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on this. Being that Fostera12 is part of that group, I believe they will all be part of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cricket Butterfly this sock farm which is significant as Fostera12 has created 65 pages, many of which were previously G5'd under that farm. Is there a way to run a quick CU with that farm and Fostera12? CNMall41 ( talk) 22:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, I see that you applied extended protection to that page for sockpuppetry. To me, it would be alright at the time it was applied but today, I feel like it should be no higher than autoconfirmed protection because she is just enough to have a Wikipedia page and there are not really any problems anymore to keep this page protected at extended level today. JuniperChill ( talk) 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Take me out to the sock game! Come get your clones! Get 'em while they're hot! -- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you take a peek at the history with your goggles and see if it needs ECP sock protection, and if anyone needs to be taken behind the toolshed? I'm a bit involved, so I don't want to do anything on my own. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you | |
Thank you. Shearonink ( talk) 19:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hey, you may want to take a look at this as it is directed at you. ภץאคгöร 21:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, There is a user who keeps bothering me. I don't want to discussion to that person anymore. Is there a way to block that user(account)? Lades2222 ( talk) 23:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I want to resolve this conflict once and for all, I want you to help me. I have a long-standing conflict with Lades2222 because he believes that I am a person who destroys Wikipedia. I don't think so, you can look at my latest edits. I always confirm my changes with links. And I have good faith. Lades2222 is even confused with another user who is from Singapore. Here he is truly violating Wikipedia by not confirming the changes with links. Because of him, you constantly block me. I'm tired of this madness. I want to forget about it and use Wikipedia freely. Please help me figure it out. I will be grateful for your help. RussianFederation02 ( talk) 09:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Because of him, you constantly block me.By the time Ponyo sees this, they're going to consider the account you're using is a sock. NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 10:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Just letting you know that the IP you've partially blocked hopped to a different one. – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Ponyo sir, I don't understand what is Wikipedia's policy? This @ Rajanyas user removed reliable/sources/content from various pages like Graharipu, Chudachandra etc. and he added his own opinion. I warned him many times but he ignored and continued his vandalism. Please block him. 2409:4085:8E99:F559:0:0:81C9:8A0B ( talk) 21:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Handled
|
---|
I am engaged in an editorial war with an editor named UserBourenane Chahine on the page "Visa requirements for Algerian citizens". In order to resolve the issue through dialogue, a bilateral discussion was held in the section titled "Bourenane Chahine" in " /info/en/?search=User_talk:Lades2222", but rather than being resolved, the conflict grew larger. Moreover, the other editor hurled harsh insults and swear words at me. And he also hurled insults and swear words at my main page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Lades2222&action=history). I also violated the "revert" rule to defend the page from the editor. This is unlikely to be effective even through mediation. Since it can't be resolved at all, what should I do so that both me and the editor in question are punished? I am already ready to be punished. Lades2222 ( talk) 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
|
I saw you blocked BenSmiththeGreat as a consequence of a sweep of Ttt24 socks including MaLaDie NaLaDie. Another day, another Ttt24 set. -- ferret ( talk) 19:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
-- ferret ( talk) 17:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Looks like another sock in waiting? -- 2409:4085:8E34:EBDC:0:0:8149:5C08 ( talk) 01:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Dear Ponyo, can you deleted Draft:The Smurfs Movie and Draft:The Pagemaster, when I check it this is fake. There this the link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Smurfs_Movie https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Pagemaster_(film) 142.122.25.19 ( talk) 14:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Nice to see you back. In the hope that you will come in later today, could you check Dekhoaayadon against PH? I see a couple of non-stale socks, Kraistag and Scheditia, the former of which was confirmed. There is article intersection between the new account and other socks - the one I've seen most often is IAmAnEditor008. Regardless of anything else, Dekhoaayadon is a suspicious new user, created on March 16, and launching a meritorious SPI, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dunki2024, on March 27; the fact that it was well-presented and had merit makes it more suspicious.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
My watchlist is littered with your archivals of SPIs. Trying to beat the record of x many archivals in y minutes? Bored? Decided to clerk because the actual clerks aren't? I had no idea I had that many SPIs on my watchlist. Now if you could just clear the CU and open backlogs ... -- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you undo the revisions by Hawalul212:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1193416148
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1190907996
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1189591573
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_Barney_and_Friends_episodes&diff=prev&oldid=1189591420 148.135.176.37 ( talk) 12:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I always appreciate your actions.
However.. sorry but, Is it impossible to take action against IPs?
Once DENOSIO's accounts are blocked, they continue to attack via IP.
I reported it to SPI, but no one resolves it.
Is there no way to take action against IPs that damage WIKI..?
Thanks. Lades2222 ( talk) 11:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Are we currenlty experiencing an example of this in action? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I've blocked MyUserPage as another sock of What is this username?, per WP:DUCK. I didn't do all the bellls and whistles, but you may want to CU to confirm. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:26, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Now that's a band I'd love to join. Drmies ( talk) 20:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate you working your admin magic on my talk page. That being said, I would be interested in connecting with that banned user off-Wiki so I can communicate with him without being in violation of the policies myself. I don't like obviously that he is committing so much vandalism, but I know it is out of boredom from what he has said and he honestly seems like a nice person, maybe just a little misguided.
I guess my perspective is that I'm not going to commit any vandalism (in fact my record shows quite the opposite), so I don't see the harm in it and maybe in fact it would be a welcome distraction--I have been in contact with other banned users before like User:Meepsheep and it never affected my conduct. Is there anyway I could maybe point him to one of my emails (maybe one not directly associated with my real name) so he can chat with me without it being disruptive? If that would be a violation too of Wikipedia policies, I will not, but I am just curious what leeway I have here. Thebirdlover ( talk) 20:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. Regarding my reverted edit 1218545167 on April 12 for the birth date of Ainsley Earhardt, I was wondering why Hollywood Life is not considered a RS. Its wikiarticle reads, “The site covers celebrity, fashion, beauty, women issues, and entertainment news.” While it doesn’t appear on the RSP list, I can’t find where it has been depreciated or noted as having inaccuracies or a failure of editorial oversight. Is there a RfC for it? Although it may not publish what some would consider “hard” news, it does cover news in its bailiwick. I realize we must comply with DOB but I don’t know of Ainsley Earhardt complaining about inclusion of her date of birth, I don’t know that the edit is contentious material, Hollywood Life is popular enough that it may reasonably be inferred that Earhardt does not object, and a simple Google search brings up her DOB top, front, and center. Your thoughts on this matter will be appreciated. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem ( talk) 03:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Ponyo,
We have an editor with a little quirk that I wanted to check in with you about and they have had this habit for years now. Every few weeks, about once a month, DinosaursLoveExistence uses their registered account to create a large number of empty categories in really random subject areas but often specific to the UK. And then, after the categories are created, a few days later, they log out and use IP accounts, like User:92.27.37.191 to fill these empty categories. Over the years, I've left probably a dozen messages, on their registered account's talk page and on the IP accounts' talk pages, simply asking them to log in to do all of their editing with their registered account but this habit has persisted for going on years now. I don't want to be a stickler for bureaucracy but as a checkuser, is there anything wrong with this behavior? Their only interest is in creating these large groups of categories and then filling them up a week later so there is no vandalism going on but they have never communicated except occasionally through edit summaries, no talk page responses at all that I have seen over the past few years.
I'm coming to you because I don't know if there is any policy about boomeranging between logged in editing and then logging out to edit, seemingly to do different kinds of tasks. They are unresponsive so I can't get any answer to my queries over the years. The only problem that exists is me tagging dozens of empty categories and then, four or five days later, untagging these categories because they are no longer empty so it's kind of a PITA. But given their lack of explanation, I can see this continuing, indefinitely and thought I'd check in with someone who regularly looks into account data. It's really just bad for them as it reveals their location but they have been alerted to this fact multiple times and they don't seem to care. Any way, I don't want to be looking for problems that aren't there but I thought I'd inquire with you. Thank you in advance for any insight you can provide with this editor's unusual behavior. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Noticed your WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Bmusique99 filing and took at look the sockpuppet's log out of curiosity. What in the world is "reviewed an image suggestion"? I have never seen that before. S0091 ( talk) 20:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I wondered about them a while ago. Thanks for figuring it out.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I request that you update the infobox image of Nelly Furtado, to a more recent one as Furtado's appearance has since changed, and because it is more consistent with articles on other celebrities. 70.50.199.125 ( talk) 03:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on this. Being that Fostera12 is part of that group, I believe they will all be part of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cricket Butterfly this sock farm which is significant as Fostera12 has created 65 pages, many of which were previously G5'd under that farm. Is there a way to run a quick CU with that farm and Fostera12? CNMall41 ( talk) 22:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, I see that you applied extended protection to that page for sockpuppetry. To me, it would be alright at the time it was applied but today, I feel like it should be no higher than autoconfirmed protection because she is just enough to have a Wikipedia page and there are not really any problems anymore to keep this page protected at extended level today. JuniperChill ( talk) 14:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Take me out to the sock game! Come get your clones! Get 'em while they're hot! -- Bbb23 ( talk) 20:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Can you take a peek at the history with your goggles and see if it needs ECP sock protection, and if anyone needs to be taken behind the toolshed? I'm a bit involved, so I don't want to do anything on my own. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you | |
Thank you. Shearonink ( talk) 19:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC) |
Hey, you may want to take a look at this as it is directed at you. ภץאคгöร 21:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, There is a user who keeps bothering me. I don't want to discussion to that person anymore. Is there a way to block that user(account)? Lades2222 ( talk) 23:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I want to resolve this conflict once and for all, I want you to help me. I have a long-standing conflict with Lades2222 because he believes that I am a person who destroys Wikipedia. I don't think so, you can look at my latest edits. I always confirm my changes with links. And I have good faith. Lades2222 is even confused with another user who is from Singapore. Here he is truly violating Wikipedia by not confirming the changes with links. Because of him, you constantly block me. I'm tired of this madness. I want to forget about it and use Wikipedia freely. Please help me figure it out. I will be grateful for your help. RussianFederation02 ( talk) 09:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Because of him, you constantly block me.By the time Ponyo sees this, they're going to consider the account you're using is a sock. NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 10:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Just letting you know that the IP you've partially blocked hopped to a different one. – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Ponyo sir, I don't understand what is Wikipedia's policy? This @ Rajanyas user removed reliable/sources/content from various pages like Graharipu, Chudachandra etc. and he added his own opinion. I warned him many times but he ignored and continued his vandalism. Please block him. 2409:4085:8E99:F559:0:0:81C9:8A0B ( talk) 21:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Handled
|
---|
I am engaged in an editorial war with an editor named UserBourenane Chahine on the page "Visa requirements for Algerian citizens". In order to resolve the issue through dialogue, a bilateral discussion was held in the section titled "Bourenane Chahine" in " /info/en/?search=User_talk:Lades2222", but rather than being resolved, the conflict grew larger. Moreover, the other editor hurled harsh insults and swear words at me. And he also hurled insults and swear words at my main page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Lades2222&action=history). I also violated the "revert" rule to defend the page from the editor. This is unlikely to be effective even through mediation. Since it can't be resolved at all, what should I do so that both me and the editor in question are punished? I am already ready to be punished. Lades2222 ( talk) 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
|
I saw you blocked BenSmiththeGreat as a consequence of a sweep of Ttt24 socks including MaLaDie NaLaDie. Another day, another Ttt24 set. -- ferret ( talk) 19:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
-- ferret ( talk) 17:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Looks like another sock in waiting? -- 2409:4085:8E34:EBDC:0:0:8149:5C08 ( talk) 01:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)