This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 |
Hi Ponyo, I suspect LINK ENERGY is a sock of Deleonsneedbyrd given User:LINK ENERGY/sandbox is the same non-sense. If you prefer an SPI report, just say the word. Hope you are enjoying the holidays! S0091 ( talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ponyo! I hope you don't mind me asking, but do you think Elizabeth Peratrovich should be at least semi-protected? She featured as today's Google Doodle, and I'm seeing a lot of editing by non-registered users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeesweet ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Wish many HAM your way in 2021! Could you please revdel the following couple of diffs: 1 2: Thank you! Infinity Knight ( talk) 13:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
user:InsulinRS popped up on my watchlist recently as a "new" user who seemed to know a lot about Wikipedia policy and procedures and who instantly found his way into multiple edit wars and copyright violation issues. He's already been issued dozens of warnings and been blocked twice since registering as a new user only a month ago, with a steady stream of personal attacks and rudeness in for the bargain. A little research leads me to believe that it's the same person who was blocked at user:2601:447:4100:C120:0:0:0:0/64 and has also edited at user:2601:447:4080:10:38A5:3EE9:89C3:DD76 - the edited articles & article topics overlap quite a bit, and the combative style is the same.
Just an FYI since you were the admin who blocked the IP user back in July... Zeng8r ( talk) 20:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
I very recently saw two identities and one IP that I suspect are the same person, writing about himself in part. Could you please take a look? I don't know how to proceed with guidance, considering BITE/AGF - the first username's creation ( Draft:Angelist101) could be a spoof. Angelist101 ( talk · contribs), Danny-brooks101 ( talk · contribs), 81.102.225.130 ( talk · contribs). Thx.-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 02:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, I noticed that you CU blocked MadhavEsen yesterday. Sorry to bother you, but would you be able to tell me the master of the account since that was one of the accounts mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EunikaSylviane? Thanks, Pahunkat ( talk) 09:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, could you please do something about this user: read here? It's not the first time he's doing this kind of thing. Thanks. Taurus Littrow ( talk) 13:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for locking the page. That lengthy history of disruption you noted consists of promotional content copied again and again from [1]. Someone from Manila really wants to hype this movie. I'm happy to ask for rev/deletion at ANI if you suggest. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Would you move Yang Yang (scientist, educator) back to the correct dab? And my technical question is if you block an editor from an article and then it moves, are they still blocked? Hadn't thought about that. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. I would like to let you know that on WP:UAA there is a series of revisions that contain a username that is blatantly racist, antisemitic and Neo-Nazi and openly calls for violence. When I checked, the user has likely been deleted from the user creation log for being extremely violent. Can you please delete the following revisions: revision 999246990 to revision 999257530 on WP:UAA. I removed the terrible username from UAA. Train of Knowledge ( Talk) 08:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I've been watching this IP since December 2020, He is recalcitrant, belligerant and ignorant of how Wikipedia works. He seemed bad back in December, but lately is much worse, attempting to block another user. I cannot imagine the decision process which gave him yet another go at Wikipedia. Not pleasant to contemplate the further volunteer effort to be frittered away on this loser who erases his Talk page daily.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 00:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
dude it was a joke Gpshshdhe ( talk) 16:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you looked into "Pretzel butterfly" and "Chocolate butterfly"; there's an odd account going around accusing people of personal attacks and generally WP:POVPUSHing in the same category area that was just created two days ago? [3] Thanks, IHateAccounts ( talk) 18:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello - 91.110.157.176 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is the IP of a sock you blocked, and they undid a large amount of changes you reverted. – DarkGlow ( ✉) 12:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
RE: User:W33KeNdr: Isn’t it awful the way we women are silenced and deprived of any power here, required to get the approval of men before we can do anything? 0;-D BTW thanks for the block. -- MelanieN ( talk) 04:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this diff? The user says they are circumventing a block, so naturally I was wondering if a CU could confirm. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 23:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Regret to inform you that the BBC IP 86.8.101.221 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is again at work after the latest block, still adding the usual unsourced info. Short term block seems to have no effect on this person. Regards, David, David J Johnson ( talk) 19:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
On Talk:Boomerang (TV network) and Talk:Teen Titans Go! - requesting that revisions 1001682797 and 1001676775 be hidden from public view on RD3 grounds. The threats of violence/physical harm really seal the deal for me. The Grand Delusion( Send a message) 21:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, can you keep an eye on this user edits? It seems the only reason he/she is here is for promoting his/her website by adding links across articles and templates. He/she may get bored, as it isn't a very active account. I'm on the fence about the username, it may considered promotional as it's combined with linkspamming, but maybe not... Regards. -- Urbanoc ( talk) 22:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Reason for Treason is Evlekis. Please revoke TPA. Thanks, Pahunkat ( talk) 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The user history of this IP address /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2.25.166.100 seems very similar in tone to User:Evelynkwapong539, who has sock puppeted twice as User:Kof4490 and User:Memeacus. Just thought I'd bring this to light since they've been a constant editor over at Looney Tunes Cartoons.
Noelephant ( talk) 04:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Noelephant ( talk) 16:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, I respect that you reverted my edit. I knew it was bound to get reverted at some point... Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 12:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Can user:Boosswhy please be blocked ASAP. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Idk how to add sources lmao but is their Youtube an adequate source? Because they did annouce that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doge1941 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
noted. Thank you! I do my best to not add any considering I'm a hard Twoset Fan! Doge1941 ( talk) 03:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
This thread references you - just FYI if you want to take a glance before I remove the thread. Cheers. -- Charitwo ( talk) ( contribs) 01:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. For some reason, my edits to semi-protected pages are no longer automatically accepted. Do you know why this problem is occurring, and is there a way to fix it? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Maestro2016 ( talk)
Who is User:ValentineBot a sock of? You switched the username soft block to a CU hard block and removed talk page access, despite their being no vandalism of the talk page (unless something's been oversighted), but didn't leave a tag or a block log comment as to who the master is. I would assume that the master is known given the preemptive removal of talk page access. 192.196.218.208 ( talk) 22:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Just an FYI, that IP you blocked for edit warring ( 93.143.83.30 ( talk · contribs)) has been making threats to an editor and their family off-wiki (see [4]). As a result, I've extended the block to a year (and for the alt IP, 93.143.81.30 ( talk · contribs)) to prevent them reappearing anytime soon. Cheers, Number 5 7 18:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
We're in the car today, headed to Aldi, and my daughter tells me about this song (a "vocaloid"?) in which a child is abandoned in a coin locker (I have to explain to her and her brother what a coin locker is). We get home, I check my pings, and I get a ping to say that something is linked to Coin-operated-locker babies, which I apparently wrote up ten years ago in honor of Maximilian333--I don't remember why. Coincidence? And then I look at the latest edit-- AND ITS THAT SONG. Whoa. Drmies ( talk) 23:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Re [5], in your Special:MyPage/common.js, if you replace User:Timotheus Canens/spihelper.js with User:GeneralNotability/spihelper.js, there is now a new feature that lets you tick a "request global lock" checkmark when blocking socks via SPI using that script. Might be useful if you're looking to save some time. Mz7 ( talk) 07:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For lots of various and sundry. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hey Ponyo, you'll know this. Is it kosher for me to just add a {{ checkuser needed}} tag to a thread on ANI? I suspect a now-blocked editor is trying a joe job on someone, and I have a vague suspicion who it is. I added that tag, but I'm NOT asking to cut in line and have you look soon; there's no real rush I think. I'm only really doing it because the editor I'm half-heartedly accusing was recently blocked by ArbCom for unexplained reasons, and I didn't know how serious an issue it was. But what I really am asking you here is if this is OK, or if I really have to file an SPI in situations like this. Which, if I have to I probably won't... </passive aggressive threat> -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
At this point I’m backing off as I feel I’m not helping and I probably should have already stepped away. I’m sorry for any role I had in making the situation worse. However, I’d like to inform you that she has now threatened legal action against me. I just felt I should bring that to your attention. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 20:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I know we don't talk anymore, but you're usually smarter (less literal) than I about certain kinds of comments. What do you think the user meant by "sad little virgins"? It sounds nasty, but I can't make any sense out of it. While I'm here: Floquenbeam, thank you for the entertaining block notice, and a very belated thanks for protecting my Talk page.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for throwing a protection on the page. I had requested protection before you got involved. My request was closed since you protected the page, but it needs to be longer period or it's just gonna start back up in a few days when it expires. If you can extended the protection I would appreciate it. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The page probably needs further protection, again (ECP expired earlier this month, and well took only about two weeks before the LTA showed himself). RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 23:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Can't seem to find anything else in the abuse log right now. However, this (LTA 8F0)? RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo. I hope you are well. I saw this edit and it reminded me of a car that I owned whose clock took so many steps to change the time it displayed that it was easier to leave it and just do the adjustment in my head. Going farther back I realized that I am so old that I can remember that clocks in cars in the 60s never displayed the correct time :-) Best regards and enjoy the rest of your week! MarnetteD| Talk 01:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Agin P. A few of these edits popped up on my watchlist and I am wondering if they are related to these. I am not sure what the SPI would be and if I'm wrong no worries. Thanks for taking a look. MarnetteD| Talk 05:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, a quick question: I know that admins can't approve an unblock request of someone who was CUed, but can they decline one? Or is it best to let the CUs handle both? I tricked you, that's TWO questions! Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo,
I am a relatively inexperienced wikipedia user and so wanted to bring your attention to the Subject John Catsimatidis. A user has been adding the phrase "Greek-" to the lead despite MOS:Ethnicity and without achieving consensus and has not engaged on the Talk page despite encouragement to do so. What is the right protocol? I am exhausted with reverting him and don't want to break three-revert rule (which he very well may do in the near future). What is your perspective and advice?
Thanks, Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 22:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Should I post on a notice board? It’s easy enough to overlook this but it’s not right that a user can blatantly ignore etiquette and rules regarding editing on Wikipedia and get away with the bad behavior, and that too for the lead of an article, in a way that clearly violates Wikipedia rules on bio leads. Just wanted your two cents. Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 22:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Ponyo. Thanks for blocking 12.178.190.58 yesterday. But (I'm on your talk page, so you knew there was going to a "but") it looks like this is a long-term problem, and they've been harassing Synthwave.94 and others for a while now. Would blocking longer than a week, and also blocking the IPv6, be appropriate? Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 03:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, I just blocked the above range based on an AIV report. Just letting you know because you CU blocked it twice in the past in case any further action is necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
hello sir, I want to create an article about (Muneer Lyati) but i found that it was deleted (by you) and i want to know if i can create it again and why it was deleted just to avoid those mistakes. thanks in advance-- Ismail2212 ( talk) 14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
hello sir. the article (Muneer lyati) was deleted by you. please discuss with me the reason. thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismail2212 ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
hello i watched the linked page. but i am not paid for creating this article, you misunderstood. but it's okay, please give me advices on creating pages and if there is Arabic wikipedia pages that needs to be translated into the English one tell me .thanks in advance -- Ismail2212 ( talk) 18:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, I'm not asking you to do anything about this yet, but I stumbled onto what I think is a sock of Yeu aga maj, who was blocked for promotional editing. Their contribution history, especially those (+62) from 4 March 2021 are all AFC submissions in various drafts, and many of them link to Yeu as the creator. I also notice intersections with Wefffrrr who is in my estimation engaging in UPE. Anyone who drops 2, 3, 4 articles a day is probs gaming the system. Throwaway name is not helping either. Wefffrrr also created an article on the Zee Marathi Awards, almost certainly so he could justify stuffing awards into actor/show articles. Look how AbhiKashMe expands that draft significantly. Feels coordinated, promotional, paid and undisclosed. I'll look for more stuff later, but I wanted to write this down somewhere so I didn't forget. I'm also happy to open an SPI later. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again:
– DarkGlow ( contribs • talk) 18:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
70.171.14.30 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) also needs to be blocked as they are a sock of the blocked 64.238.189.139 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). -- Valjean ( talk) 16:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi POnyo,
In January, I had a persistent problem with a new editor on the page called Kleo-Sine. He had made an edit and I, being a grammarian, just wanted to correct a grammar mistake. He took it badly and basically went through my edit history and started focusing on my edits. A lot of it was technical info box stuff that I wasn't sure was right,p. He also never wrote edit histories. Also, anytime someone would write him on his talk page, he would just blank him. I even went to the Teahouse and they noticed it too. It was annoying. Then, a few days later, I saw that you had blocked the page.
Well after close to two months and he's back under a new alias called SlippyLina. I'm sure it is the same person. He's attacking some of my favorite pages and he's taking the fun out of editing. He always seems to want to one up me and he's not using edit histories or answering talk pages. Could you look into this for me and do something.? /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/SlippyLina Also Check this one out? Could he be a sock? Any help would be appreciated. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/GinoMarioBudlettino Thanks 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 07:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
This was the account that was causing me all those problems early in the year. I had first went to the Teahouse to ask for advice and spoke to a user named Timtempleton, who noticed that he was not adding edit histories and not answering messages on his talk page, understanding what I was going through. As I am not a technical guy, I wasn't sure if the technical edits were above board. Timtempleton tried to help me, but nothing really happened. A week later, I saw that you had blocked this account indefinitely and I couldn't figure out why. I didn't know he returned until 2 days ago when he came back into my realm and found the two accounts with similar M.O.s which I linked to above. To think, just because of a simple grammatical edit I made on a page that he was editing, I seem to have made an enemy on Wikipedia.
Anyhow, here is the original account that was causing the issues. Can you let me know what you did with this account? /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Kleo-Sine 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 21:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you. Here is another one from the same guy. It has some of the same threads from the previous ones that he edits. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/SuffolkCat
It's a bit annoying. 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 13:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you once again everyone. I don't want to be a pest. I just wanted to ask what is happeing with this guy. If I do more edits, will he continue to register as someone else and do a mass revert everytime? Am I never safe? Was he conspiring me to make me look like the villain or sockpuppet here? I am not versed in the technical and business aspects of Wikipedia. I do like to edit and contribute to certain of my favorite pages, but if I now have a continual target, Should I even bother with Wikipedia any more? All this because of a simple grammatical edit. I wasn't trying to vandalise anybody. Any help would be appreciated by anyone! 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 19:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the detection and corresponding action! Boud ( talk) 21:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Please don't add unneeded information on introduction column. I have undo your edit, from diff1 to diff2. Please avoid to add this unneeded info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farazdeswali ( talk • contribs) 23:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
This user, previously warned by you, has vandalized the Hugh Grant page today with this libellous edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hugh_Grant&diff=1013582574&oldid=1012587596
Rodericksilly ( talk) 23:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I believe he's back again: see User talk:ARP2021 ( t · c) buidhe 12:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I randomly came across this message about ~~ImRichEnoughForAButler~~ Tojodavid and 70RP3D0-MLWR all being blocked as socks. I have blocked usernames set to render as strikethrough, and saw only the first two rendered as blocked. I see you edited [7] the third user page with a CheckUser blocke template, but their blocklog [8] is empty and your log [9] doesn't show an action against them either.
I know nothing of the situation, but I assume you'll want to sort out the inconsistency one way or the other. Alsee ( talk) 11:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
here.-- Nat Gertler ( talk) 19:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
A Korean IP editor persists in removing sourced content from a short section about a collision between Lim Eunsoo and Mariah Bell. The content discusses the ISU ruling on the issue; she is clearly a fan of the Korean skater and wants the content to read as though Bell is to blame. She refuses to discuss or refrain from removing the content she objects to. Would you be willing to protect the page for a few days so she'll move on? Thank you! ----Dr.Margi ✉ 02:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | Archive 52 |
Hi Ponyo, I suspect LINK ENERGY is a sock of Deleonsneedbyrd given User:LINK ENERGY/sandbox is the same non-sense. If you prefer an SPI report, just say the word. Hope you are enjoying the holidays! S0091 ( talk) 22:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ponyo! I hope you don't mind me asking, but do you think Elizabeth Peratrovich should be at least semi-protected? She featured as today's Google Doodle, and I'm seeing a lot of editing by non-registered users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeesweet ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Wish many HAM your way in 2021! Could you please revdel the following couple of diffs: 1 2: Thank you! Infinity Knight ( talk) 13:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
user:InsulinRS popped up on my watchlist recently as a "new" user who seemed to know a lot about Wikipedia policy and procedures and who instantly found his way into multiple edit wars and copyright violation issues. He's already been issued dozens of warnings and been blocked twice since registering as a new user only a month ago, with a steady stream of personal attacks and rudeness in for the bargain. A little research leads me to believe that it's the same person who was blocked at user:2601:447:4100:C120:0:0:0:0/64 and has also edited at user:2601:447:4080:10:38A5:3EE9:89C3:DD76 - the edited articles & article topics overlap quite a bit, and the combative style is the same.
Just an FYI since you were the admin who blocked the IP user back in July... Zeng8r ( talk) 20:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
I very recently saw two identities and one IP that I suspect are the same person, writing about himself in part. Could you please take a look? I don't know how to proceed with guidance, considering BITE/AGF - the first username's creation ( Draft:Angelist101) could be a spoof. Angelist101 ( talk · contribs), Danny-brooks101 ( talk · contribs), 81.102.225.130 ( talk · contribs). Thx.-- Rocknrollmancer ( talk) 02:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, I noticed that you CU blocked MadhavEsen yesterday. Sorry to bother you, but would you be able to tell me the master of the account since that was one of the accounts mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EunikaSylviane? Thanks, Pahunkat ( talk) 09:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, could you please do something about this user: read here? It's not the first time he's doing this kind of thing. Thanks. Taurus Littrow ( talk) 13:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for locking the page. That lengthy history of disruption you noted consists of promotional content copied again and again from [1]. Someone from Manila really wants to hype this movie. I'm happy to ask for rev/deletion at ANI if you suggest. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 19:53, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Would you move Yang Yang (scientist, educator) back to the correct dab? And my technical question is if you block an editor from an article and then it moves, are they still blocked? Hadn't thought about that. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo. I would like to let you know that on WP:UAA there is a series of revisions that contain a username that is blatantly racist, antisemitic and Neo-Nazi and openly calls for violence. When I checked, the user has likely been deleted from the user creation log for being extremely violent. Can you please delete the following revisions: revision 999246990 to revision 999257530 on WP:UAA. I removed the terrible username from UAA. Train of Knowledge ( Talk) 08:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
I've been watching this IP since December 2020, He is recalcitrant, belligerant and ignorant of how Wikipedia works. He seemed bad back in December, but lately is much worse, attempting to block another user. I cannot imagine the decision process which gave him yet another go at Wikipedia. Not pleasant to contemplate the further volunteer effort to be frittered away on this loser who erases his Talk page daily.-- Quisqualis ( talk) 00:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
dude it was a joke Gpshshdhe ( talk) 16:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you looked into "Pretzel butterfly" and "Chocolate butterfly"; there's an odd account going around accusing people of personal attacks and generally WP:POVPUSHing in the same category area that was just created two days ago? [3] Thanks, IHateAccounts ( talk) 18:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello - 91.110.157.176 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is the IP of a sock you blocked, and they undid a large amount of changes you reverted. – DarkGlow ( ✉) 12:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
RE: User:W33KeNdr: Isn’t it awful the way we women are silenced and deprived of any power here, required to get the approval of men before we can do anything? 0;-D BTW thanks for the block. -- MelanieN ( talk) 04:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this diff? The user says they are circumventing a block, so naturally I was wondering if a CU could confirm. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 23:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo, Regret to inform you that the BBC IP 86.8.101.221 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is again at work after the latest block, still adding the usual unsourced info. Short term block seems to have no effect on this person. Regards, David, David J Johnson ( talk) 19:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
On Talk:Boomerang (TV network) and Talk:Teen Titans Go! - requesting that revisions 1001682797 and 1001676775 be hidden from public view on RD3 grounds. The threats of violence/physical harm really seal the deal for me. The Grand Delusion( Send a message) 21:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, can you keep an eye on this user edits? It seems the only reason he/she is here is for promoting his/her website by adding links across articles and templates. He/she may get bored, as it isn't a very active account. I'm on the fence about the username, it may considered promotional as it's combined with linkspamming, but maybe not... Regards. -- Urbanoc ( talk) 22:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Reason for Treason is Evlekis. Please revoke TPA. Thanks, Pahunkat ( talk) 22:19, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The user history of this IP address /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/2.25.166.100 seems very similar in tone to User:Evelynkwapong539, who has sock puppeted twice as User:Kof4490 and User:Memeacus. Just thought I'd bring this to light since they've been a constant editor over at Looney Tunes Cartoons.
Noelephant ( talk) 04:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Noelephant ( talk) 16:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo, I respect that you reverted my edit. I knew it was bound to get reverted at some point... Cheers, Hockeycatcat ( talk) 12:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Can user:Boosswhy please be blocked ASAP. CLCStudent ( talk) 19:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Idk how to add sources lmao but is their Youtube an adequate source? Because they did annouce that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doge1941 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
noted. Thank you! I do my best to not add any considering I'm a hard Twoset Fan! Doge1941 ( talk) 03:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
This thread references you - just FYI if you want to take a glance before I remove the thread. Cheers. -- Charitwo ( talk) ( contribs) 01:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello. For some reason, my edits to semi-protected pages are no longer automatically accepted. Do you know why this problem is occurring, and is there a way to fix it? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Maestro2016 ( talk)
Who is User:ValentineBot a sock of? You switched the username soft block to a CU hard block and removed talk page access, despite their being no vandalism of the talk page (unless something's been oversighted), but didn't leave a tag or a block log comment as to who the master is. I would assume that the master is known given the preemptive removal of talk page access. 192.196.218.208 ( talk) 22:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Just an FYI, that IP you blocked for edit warring ( 93.143.83.30 ( talk · contribs)) has been making threats to an editor and their family off-wiki (see [4]). As a result, I've extended the block to a year (and for the alt IP, 93.143.81.30 ( talk · contribs)) to prevent them reappearing anytime soon. Cheers, Number 5 7 18:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
We're in the car today, headed to Aldi, and my daughter tells me about this song (a "vocaloid"?) in which a child is abandoned in a coin locker (I have to explain to her and her brother what a coin locker is). We get home, I check my pings, and I get a ping to say that something is linked to Coin-operated-locker babies, which I apparently wrote up ten years ago in honor of Maximilian333--I don't remember why. Coincidence? And then I look at the latest edit-- AND ITS THAT SONG. Whoa. Drmies ( talk) 23:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Re [5], in your Special:MyPage/common.js, if you replace User:Timotheus Canens/spihelper.js with User:GeneralNotability/spihelper.js, there is now a new feature that lets you tick a "request global lock" checkmark when blocking socks via SPI using that script. Might be useful if you're looking to save some time. Mz7 ( talk) 07:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For lots of various and sundry. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 22:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC) |
Hey Ponyo, you'll know this. Is it kosher for me to just add a {{ checkuser needed}} tag to a thread on ANI? I suspect a now-blocked editor is trying a joe job on someone, and I have a vague suspicion who it is. I added that tag, but I'm NOT asking to cut in line and have you look soon; there's no real rush I think. I'm only really doing it because the editor I'm half-heartedly accusing was recently blocked by ArbCom for unexplained reasons, and I didn't know how serious an issue it was. But what I really am asking you here is if this is OK, or if I really have to file an SPI in situations like this. Which, if I have to I probably won't... </passive aggressive threat> -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
At this point I’m backing off as I feel I’m not helping and I probably should have already stepped away. I’m sorry for any role I had in making the situation worse. However, I’d like to inform you that she has now threatened legal action against me. I just felt I should bring that to your attention. Thank you. Samurai Kung fu Cowboy ( talk) 20:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I know we don't talk anymore, but you're usually smarter (less literal) than I about certain kinds of comments. What do you think the user meant by "sad little virgins"? It sounds nasty, but I can't make any sense out of it. While I'm here: Floquenbeam, thank you for the entertaining block notice, and a very belated thanks for protecting my Talk page.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for throwing a protection on the page. I had requested protection before you got involved. My request was closed since you protected the page, but it needs to be longer period or it's just gonna start back up in a few days when it expires. If you can extended the protection I would appreciate it. Thanks! Nemov ( talk) 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The page probably needs further protection, again (ECP expired earlier this month, and well took only about two weeks before the LTA showed himself). RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 23:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Can't seem to find anything else in the abuse log right now. However, this (LTA 8F0)? RandomCanadian ( talk / contribs) 00:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ponyo. I hope you are well. I saw this edit and it reminded me of a car that I owned whose clock took so many steps to change the time it displayed that it was easier to leave it and just do the adjustment in my head. Going farther back I realized that I am so old that I can remember that clocks in cars in the 60s never displayed the correct time :-) Best regards and enjoy the rest of your week! MarnetteD| Talk 01:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Agin P. A few of these edits popped up on my watchlist and I am wondering if they are related to these. I am not sure what the SPI would be and if I'm wrong no worries. Thanks for taking a look. MarnetteD| Talk 05:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, a quick question: I know that admins can't approve an unblock request of someone who was CUed, but can they decline one? Or is it best to let the CUs handle both? I tricked you, that's TWO questions! Thanks, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Ponyo,
I am a relatively inexperienced wikipedia user and so wanted to bring your attention to the Subject John Catsimatidis. A user has been adding the phrase "Greek-" to the lead despite MOS:Ethnicity and without achieving consensus and has not engaged on the Talk page despite encouragement to do so. What is the right protocol? I am exhausted with reverting him and don't want to break three-revert rule (which he very well may do in the near future). What is your perspective and advice?
Thanks, Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 22:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Should I post on a notice board? It’s easy enough to overlook this but it’s not right that a user can blatantly ignore etiquette and rules regarding editing on Wikipedia and get away with the bad behavior, and that too for the lead of an article, in a way that clearly violates Wikipedia rules on bio leads. Just wanted your two cents. Apoorva Iyer ( talk) 22:58, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Ponyo. Thanks for blocking 12.178.190.58 yesterday. But (I'm on your talk page, so you knew there was going to a "but") it looks like this is a long-term problem, and they've been harassing Synthwave.94 and others for a while now. Would blocking longer than a week, and also blocking the IPv6, be appropriate? Suffusion of Yellow ( talk) 03:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Hey Ponyo, I just blocked the above range based on an AIV report. Just letting you know because you CU blocked it twice in the past in case any further action is necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
hello sir, I want to create an article about (Muneer Lyati) but i found that it was deleted (by you) and i want to know if i can create it again and why it was deleted just to avoid those mistakes. thanks in advance-- Ismail2212 ( talk) 14:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
hello sir. the article (Muneer lyati) was deleted by you. please discuss with me the reason. thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismail2212 ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
hello i watched the linked page. but i am not paid for creating this article, you misunderstood. but it's okay, please give me advices on creating pages and if there is Arabic wikipedia pages that needs to be translated into the English one tell me .thanks in advance -- Ismail2212 ( talk) 18:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey there, I'm not asking you to do anything about this yet, but I stumbled onto what I think is a sock of Yeu aga maj, who was blocked for promotional editing. Their contribution history, especially those (+62) from 4 March 2021 are all AFC submissions in various drafts, and many of them link to Yeu as the creator. I also notice intersections with Wefffrrr who is in my estimation engaging in UPE. Anyone who drops 2, 3, 4 articles a day is probs gaming the system. Throwaway name is not helping either. Wefffrrr also created an article on the Zee Marathi Awards, almost certainly so he could justify stuffing awards into actor/show articles. Look how AbhiKashMe expands that draft significantly. Feels coordinated, promotional, paid and undisclosed. I'll look for more stuff later, but I wanted to write this down somewhere so I didn't forget. I'm also happy to open an SPI later. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 21:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again:
– DarkGlow ( contribs • talk) 18:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
70.171.14.30 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) also needs to be blocked as they are a sock of the blocked 64.238.189.139 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). -- Valjean ( talk) 16:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi POnyo,
In January, I had a persistent problem with a new editor on the page called Kleo-Sine. He had made an edit and I, being a grammarian, just wanted to correct a grammar mistake. He took it badly and basically went through my edit history and started focusing on my edits. A lot of it was technical info box stuff that I wasn't sure was right,p. He also never wrote edit histories. Also, anytime someone would write him on his talk page, he would just blank him. I even went to the Teahouse and they noticed it too. It was annoying. Then, a few days later, I saw that you had blocked the page.
Well after close to two months and he's back under a new alias called SlippyLina. I'm sure it is the same person. He's attacking some of my favorite pages and he's taking the fun out of editing. He always seems to want to one up me and he's not using edit histories or answering talk pages. Could you look into this for me and do something.? /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/SlippyLina Also Check this one out? Could he be a sock? Any help would be appreciated. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/GinoMarioBudlettino Thanks 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 07:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
This was the account that was causing me all those problems early in the year. I had first went to the Teahouse to ask for advice and spoke to a user named Timtempleton, who noticed that he was not adding edit histories and not answering messages on his talk page, understanding what I was going through. As I am not a technical guy, I wasn't sure if the technical edits were above board. Timtempleton tried to help me, but nothing really happened. A week later, I saw that you had blocked this account indefinitely and I couldn't figure out why. I didn't know he returned until 2 days ago when he came back into my realm and found the two accounts with similar M.O.s which I linked to above. To think, just because of a simple grammatical edit I made on a page that he was editing, I seem to have made an enemy on Wikipedia.
Anyhow, here is the original account that was causing the issues. Can you let me know what you did with this account? /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Kleo-Sine 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 21:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you. Here is another one from the same guy. It has some of the same threads from the previous ones that he edits. /info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/SuffolkCat
It's a bit annoying. 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 13:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you once again everyone. I don't want to be a pest. I just wanted to ask what is happeing with this guy. If I do more edits, will he continue to register as someone else and do a mass revert everytime? Am I never safe? Was he conspiring me to make me look like the villain or sockpuppet here? I am not versed in the technical and business aspects of Wikipedia. I do like to edit and contribute to certain of my favorite pages, but if I now have a continual target, Should I even bother with Wikipedia any more? All this because of a simple grammatical edit. I wasn't trying to vandalise anybody. Any help would be appreciated by anyone! 135.0.252.54 ( talk) 19:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the detection and corresponding action! Boud ( talk) 21:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Please don't add unneeded information on introduction column. I have undo your edit, from diff1 to diff2. Please avoid to add this unneeded info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farazdeswali ( talk • contribs) 23:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
This user, previously warned by you, has vandalized the Hugh Grant page today with this libellous edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hugh_Grant&diff=1013582574&oldid=1012587596
Rodericksilly ( talk) 23:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I believe he's back again: see User talk:ARP2021 ( t · c) buidhe 12:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
I randomly came across this message about ~~ImRichEnoughForAButler~~ Tojodavid and 70RP3D0-MLWR all being blocked as socks. I have blocked usernames set to render as strikethrough, and saw only the first two rendered as blocked. I see you edited [7] the third user page with a CheckUser blocke template, but their blocklog [8] is empty and your log [9] doesn't show an action against them either.
I know nothing of the situation, but I assume you'll want to sort out the inconsistency one way or the other. Alsee ( talk) 11:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
here.-- Nat Gertler ( talk) 19:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
A Korean IP editor persists in removing sourced content from a short section about a collision between Lim Eunsoo and Mariah Bell. The content discusses the ISU ruling on the issue; she is clearly a fan of the Korean skater and wants the content to read as though Bell is to blame. She refuses to discuss or refrain from removing the content she objects to. Would you be willing to protect the page for a few days so she'll move on? Thank you! ----Dr.Margi ✉ 02:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |