I've been dealing with vandalism for a while, such as warning editors, sometimes reverting edits, and checking the abuse log, and have even made some reports to AIV which were responded to by a block. I'm curious what my chances of passing an RfA are. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions) 14:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate General of France, Miami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 07:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, just pinging in case you have anything else to add to the comments there. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably a spambot, see [1], probably will bring up more. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 18:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I recently ran across several articles that were both edited by or created by a member of the public relations team for a large company that include both company pages for their own company, their clients they have worked for, as well as the biographies for their bosses.
I know we have the paid@wiki email address we can report the undisclosed paid editing violation to but my concern lies with what to do about the articles in question since they read like advertisements, albeit somewhat well sourced. Or I guess a more accurate question would be how to properly nominate an article for deletion that has been created/edited by paid editors without 'outing' the editors. Do I report to paid and then wait to see if they get blocked, and only then nominate per the above since it would not be considered outing (I think)?
I'm just trying to see what the normal procedure is without compromising anyone's info or breaking a rule.
I appreciate any advice you can give or a push in the right direction you can provide, and thank you in advance.
Awshort ( talk) 17:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Howdy,
Upon recommendation from WP:AN to consult a CheckUser, I figured I'd ask if you could take a look here and determine whether a rangeblock would be an appropriate course of action. With over 80 socks in the past five years, it's becoming clear that mere SPI blocks aren't enough to deal with this sockmaster. The Kip 20:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
I've been dealing with vandalism for a while, such as warning editors, sometimes reverting edits, and checking the abuse log, and have even made some reports to AIV which were responded to by a block. I'm curious what my chances of passing an RfA are. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions) 14:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate General of France, Miami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.AusLondonder ( talk) 07:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Greetings, just pinging in case you have anything else to add to the comments there. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 07:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably a spambot, see [1], probably will bring up more. v/r - Seawolf35 T-- C 18:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I recently ran across several articles that were both edited by or created by a member of the public relations team for a large company that include both company pages for their own company, their clients they have worked for, as well as the biographies for their bosses.
I know we have the paid@wiki email address we can report the undisclosed paid editing violation to but my concern lies with what to do about the articles in question since they read like advertisements, albeit somewhat well sourced. Or I guess a more accurate question would be how to properly nominate an article for deletion that has been created/edited by paid editors without 'outing' the editors. Do I report to paid and then wait to see if they get blocked, and only then nominate per the above since it would not be considered outing (I think)?
I'm just trying to see what the normal procedure is without compromising anyone's info or breaking a rule.
I appreciate any advice you can give or a push in the right direction you can provide, and thank you in advance.
Awshort ( talk) 17:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Howdy,
Upon recommendation from WP:AN to consult a CheckUser, I figured I'd ask if you could take a look here and determine whether a rangeblock would be an appropriate course of action. With over 80 socks in the past five years, it's becoming clear that mere SPI blocks aren't enough to deal with this sockmaster. The Kip 20:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)