 | Points of interest related to
North Carolina on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to North Carolina. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|North Carolina|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove links to other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to North Carolina.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:| watch |
Goodnight Scholars Program
- Goodnight Scholars Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not independently notable (and notability is not inherited from its unquestionably notable parent organization). ElKevbo ( talk) 21:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Technology, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just do a WP:BOLD redirect to James_Goodnight#Wealth_and_philanthropy, where this is already mentioned; no need to have an AFD for this obvious ATD. Reywas92 Talk 01:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 10:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like the redirect ATD proposed by Reywas92. I guess there's some benefit in having it the result of a AfD (now that we're already here) in that it's harder to revert. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 10:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Park Scholarships
- Park Scholarships ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not independently notable (and notability is not inherited from its unquestionably notable parent organization). ElKevbo ( talk) 21:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 10:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Jaars-Townsend Airport
- Jaars-Townsend Airport ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable private airport. Coverage in secondary sources is nil. Could be redirected to JAARS. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and North Carolina. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- redirect to JAARS#JAARS Base per nom. There's no independent notability. Mangoe ( talk) 02:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- If this article does not meet the notability criteria then I second Mangoe’s suggestion L.arlanda27 ( talk) 06:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Accesswire
- Accesswire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP a before finds no significant coverage in independent sources, the article has only primary sources, seems like there is nothing else. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- They claim to lead the industry but according to customers they just spam press releases to some obscure websites. Polygnotus ( talk) 06:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Would need a major overhaul with proper sourcing to meet GNG.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This is one of the largest press release companies, it is well-known, so it's very very hard to find coverage that is independent from Accesswire. I've spent 15 minutes looking and I can't see anything. If someone can find and send over a few links that are, I am quite willing to change my vote to keep. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment as creator: Echoing Cleo. I created this page as it is a widely known company in the PR world, and ( referenced quite extensively). I started this article as stub, to eventually work on it, but I never had the time. If someone can save it, please do. But as the creator, I remain neutral. Cheers, Reh man 10:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looked for sources in several places that discuss the firm, but found nothing of use. yes, they are cited widely but to my knowledge that itself doesn't warrant notability without any sort of sig coverage of themselves. X ( talk) 05:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - @ Rehman:, I looked hard for sources but unfortunately am only finding websites that write content based on releases they have made. Nothing in-depth about the company which would be a requirement of WP:ORGCRIT. It is unfortunate as it is one of the more well-known press release distribution platforms. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 00:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Robert McGee
- Robert McGee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm usually sympathetic to pages on perpetual students but I couldn't find enough reliable sources for this person besides that he got a bunch of degrees and is a professor. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Sportspeople, Martial arts, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Interesting human interest story and I'm amazed he hasn't been featured in NPR or something... I don't see anything we'd use, no news coverage, nothing, for sourcing. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Other than mentions of his degrees and being a professor, I cannot find anything to convince GNG.-- Tumbuka Arch ( talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Independent sigcov appears in the Fayetteville Observer ( more, book review) and Miami Herald ( cont., later). His Google Scholar may suggest an NPROF pass too but I don't know the field well enough. Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 14:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- I think the multiple sources with SIGCOV provided by Hameltion are enough for a GNG pass. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per GNG and per WP:NPROF#1 based on his GS profile, he seems to be highly cited for his field in ethics/philosophy. Also there is enough evidence for a GNG pass.-- hroest 07:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
WNCR-LD
- WNCR-LD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina#LPTV stations: The article at least claims that there at least was some local programming (a newscast), but that statement has been there since the article's creation, and the only real "expansion" since then has been to the usual solely-database-sourced permastub of the type that is finally being rejected in this topic area. Maybe there's more significant coverage out there, but by and large this is another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006 that no longer warrants anything more than an {{ R to list entry}} as an alternative to deletion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
WHFL-CD
- WHFL-CD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Christianity, and North Carolina. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina#LPTV stations: It isn't quite the type of all-national programming service so many LPTVs are, but I'm not convinced this likely- run-of-the-mill religious station has much significant coverage either. Likely a remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus and no indicaiton further input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 02:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Gregg Henriques
- Gregg Henriques ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Given that most external links go to either gregghenriques.com or unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org and not to very many well-known independent sources that would significantly cover him, I have a suspicion that this article might not survive the AfD test in its current state. – MrPersonHumanGuy ( talk) 23:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Psychology, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- the article is a mess, but the subject has a credible claim at notability as a full professor of psychiatry at a well-known university, with a pretty good citation trail. The impact does, however, look a little bit low for the field; if someone with more domain-specific knowledge could weigh it I'd appreciate it. (Adding signature -- -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC))
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relistiing due to low participation. Please remember to sign all comments made in a deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
| Points of interest related to
North Carolina on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to North Carolina. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|North Carolina|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove links to other discussions ( prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to North Carolina.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:| watch |
Goodnight Scholars Program
- Goodnight Scholars Program ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not independently notable (and notability is not inherited from its unquestionably notable parent organization). ElKevbo ( talk) 21:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Technology, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just do a WP:BOLD redirect to James_Goodnight#Wealth_and_philanthropy, where this is already mentioned; no need to have an AFD for this obvious ATD. Reywas92 Talk 01:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 10:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like the redirect ATD proposed by Reywas92. I guess there's some benefit in having it the result of a AfD (now that we're already here) in that it's harder to revert. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 10:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Park Scholarships
- Park Scholarships ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is not independently notable (and notability is not inherited from its unquestionably notable parent organization). ElKevbo ( talk) 21:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 10:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Jaars-Townsend Airport
- Jaars-Townsend Airport ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable private airport. Coverage in secondary sources is nil. Could be redirected to JAARS. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and North Carolina. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- redirect to JAARS#JAARS Base per nom. There's no independent notability. Mangoe ( talk) 02:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- If this article does not meet the notability criteria then I second Mangoe’s suggestion L.arlanda27 ( talk) 06:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Accesswire
- Accesswire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP a before finds no significant coverage in independent sources, the article has only primary sources, seems like there is nothing else. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- They claim to lead the industry but according to customers they just spam press releases to some obscure websites. Polygnotus ( talk) 06:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong ( talk) 06:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Would need a major overhaul with proper sourcing to meet GNG.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 07:32, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This is one of the largest press release companies, it is well-known, so it's very very hard to find coverage that is independent from Accesswire. I've spent 15 minutes looking and I can't see anything. If someone can find and send over a few links that are, I am quite willing to change my vote to keep. Cleo Cooper ( talk) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment as creator: Echoing Cleo. I created this page as it is a widely known company in the PR world, and ( referenced quite extensively). I started this article as stub, to eventually work on it, but I never had the time. If someone can save it, please do. But as the creator, I remain neutral. Cheers, Reh man 10:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Looked for sources in several places that discuss the firm, but found nothing of use. yes, they are cited widely but to my knowledge that itself doesn't warrant notability without any sort of sig coverage of themselves. X ( talk) 05:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - @ Rehman:, I looked hard for sources but unfortunately am only finding websites that write content based on releases they have made. Nothing in-depth about the company which would be a requirement of WP:ORGCRIT. It is unfortunate as it is one of the more well-known press release distribution platforms. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 00:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Robert McGee
- Robert McGee ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm usually sympathetic to pages on perpetual students but I couldn't find enough reliable sources for this person besides that he got a bunch of degrees and is a professor. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Sportspeople, Martial arts, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Interesting human interest story and I'm amazed he hasn't been featured in NPR or something... I don't see anything we'd use, no news coverage, nothing, for sourcing. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:12, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Other than mentions of his degrees and being a professor, I cannot find anything to convince GNG.-- Tumbuka Arch ( talk) 11:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Independent sigcov appears in the Fayetteville Observer ( more, book review) and Miami Herald ( cont., later). His Google Scholar may suggest an NPROF pass too but I don't know the field well enough. Hameltion ( talk | contribs) 14:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- I think the multiple sources with SIGCOV provided by Hameltion are enough for a GNG pass. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per GNG and per WP:NPROF#1 based on his GS profile, he seems to be highly cited for his field in ethics/philosophy. Also there is enough evidence for a GNG pass.-- hroest 07:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
WNCR-LD
- WNCR-LD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and North Carolina. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina#LPTV stations: The article at least claims that there at least was some local programming (a newscast), but that statement has been there since the article's creation, and the only real "expansion" since then has been to the usual solely-database-sourced permastub of the type that is finally being rejected in this topic area. Maybe there's more significant coverage out there, but by and large this is another remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006 that no longer warrants anything more than an {{ R to list entry}} as an alternative to deletion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
WHFL-CD
- WHFL-CD ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Christianity, and North Carolina. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of television stations in North Carolina#LPTV stations: It isn't quite the type of all-national programming service so many LPTVs are, but I'm not convinced this likely- run-of-the-mill religious station has much significant coverage either. Likely a remnant of the looser inclusion "standards" of 2006. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus and no indicaiton further input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 02:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Gregg Henriques
- Gregg Henriques ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Given that most external links go to either gregghenriques.com or unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org and not to very many well-known independent sources that would significantly cover him, I have a suspicion that this article might not survive the AfD test in its current state. – MrPersonHumanGuy ( talk) 23:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Psychology, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- the article is a mess, but the subject has a credible claim at notability as a full professor of psychiatry at a well-known university, with a pretty good citation trail. The impact does, however, look a little bit low for the field; if someone with more domain-specific knowledge could weigh it I'd appreciate it. (Adding signature -- -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 10:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC))
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relistiing due to low participation. Please remember to sign all comments made in a deletion discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.