The result was merge to Rapture (BioShock). Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This character looks a bit popular for Bioshock. But before the result shows only merchandise and costume or being cosplayed. This source is a bit good [1], but it looks like another typical listicle with a short commentary. Nothing else. I may be wrong at Google Scholar thou. Greenish Pickle! ( 🔔) 23:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of ports in the United States. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Merge with United States container ports or List of ports in the United States? Article overlaps with and isn't distinct enough from the other two. मल्ल ( talk) 14:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bible Presbyterian Church. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Micro-denomination with two churches. Citations are exclusively to primary sources or to outdated sources of questionable independence and reliability. Participants in the 2013 AfD discussion highlighted the availability of coverage in Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religions (8th edition, 2009), page 252, but the coverage is so cursory that I do not believe it qualifies as "encyclopedic" coverage for purposes of establishing notability. (Citations to the two-paragraph Melton mention were never added in the first place.) The Melton source is based on a list of Reformed entities, most of which are not notable, published in 1999 ( see here). I cannot identify other independent, secondary, reliable sources that verify the notability of this denomination. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 17:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Cairns. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
So, mayors are not inherently notable under WP:NPOL, neither in WP:NSUBPOL. They have to pass WP:GNG to qualify for a standalone entry. This is currently not the case here as this subject fails GNG as a matter of fact. The current sources, with the exception of Cairnes Post, do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV. This is supposed to be simple for someone who understands WP:NPOL works. Cairns as a city is not significantly large based on population census. Overall, mayors should simply not be kept if they do not pass WP:GNG all in the name of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just to be fair, a WP:BEFORE did not return anything useful also. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 21:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
...I contend mayors of significant population centres are notable...– If that's your belief, one which I don't believe is widely held, then you should propose an amendment to WP:NPOL. As of now, that's simply not how it works. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Super Mario. This is pretty evenly split but the informal source analysis helped tilt this to a Redirect closure rather than another relisting. My hope is that since the content remains, an editor(s) can get going on creating Super Mario Universe and later Merge this content into that new article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural listing. This was
WP:BLARed, restored, then BLARed a second time, and per that page, Most users believe that AfD should be used to settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting
. ~
A412
talk! 23:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion is divided between Keep and Redirect as implied by the nominator. A source analysis would be helpful since improvements have been made to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nom is blocked for sockpuppetry. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 22:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable actress and model. Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:BLP1E as model. Fails notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellore Aarathi ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I want to see if there is more support for a Keep. Though why the nominator is citing
WP:NPOL is beyond me.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete: No sources of her in recent times, truely unaware if she is even in the entertainment industry anymore. Delete this article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Isha.Narain (
talk •
contribs) 05:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock puppet.
PhilKnight (
talk) 11:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I tend to favor ATD but I don't think The Game of Life/Yahtzee/Payday is a likely search term for readers. I think it would be better to create separate Redirects for each game or provide a link on the main game articles to the Game Boy Advance games article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Did an extensive search, found only one review: [6] Otherwise, there's almost no coverage. Also checked print sources, only to find brief mentions of it in a couple Nintendo Power magazines. Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 22:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Also, underwent a 10Kb expansion. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
I doubt the encyclopedic value of the article, but if it must remain, I am in favor of moving it as a subheading to the " Martin Coogan" article. Redivy ( talk) 22:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP of someone known purely as an unsuccessful candidate for a state legislature. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. partially because of the lack of a compelling deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I think " Legislature of Guam" should be given as a subheading and also deleted. Redivy ( talk) 22:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be recreated as a DAB if subjects with this last name end up with articles Star Mississippi 00:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable surname. There are no articles on English Wikipedia for a person with this surname (or variant thereof), and only one article on German Wikipedia for a person with a variant of this surname ( de:Laura Ufermann). toweli ( talk) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 20:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. and Redirect to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 17. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
No notable roles, non-significant roles in two series thereby clearly failing WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. No significant coverage and sources thereby, failing WP:SIGCOV as well. Imsaneikigai ( talk) 19:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sun Life Financial#India. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 19:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable Russian producer with some of the oldest citation needed templates on Wikipedia - and no sources I could find to answer them. Not to be confused with the eponymous Dutch producer [11]. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 19:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Could be something in non-English sources but from what I see on the page and what I can find in a search, this company fails WP:ORGCRIT. Sources fail to meet WP:ORGCRIT. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. as there is opposition to a Redirect. Editors can try creating one on their own if they so choose. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Another former mayor of Cairns Region who does not meet point 2 of WP:NPOL and does not appear to meet WP:GNG. As a local elected official, they are not considered inherently notable and the coverage that I'm finding all appears to be fairly routine. This person also has a shortened term (4 months) compared to most mayors because they were appointed to the position to finish out the term of the retiring mayor and then lost re-election. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Botswana Twenty20 International cricketers. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Botswana Twenty20 International cricketers. The closest thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I found was coverage about his unique bowling action ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 17:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The location of Kern, Kirtley & Herr, site of "a century-old tradition of manufacturing and selling feeds for numerous species of farm animals and pets." This is a rail spot; the siding has been severed, but its position next to the tracks remains the same as the complex has mutated and expanded across the road, the only significant structures back into the early 1950s. There's no sign there was ever a town around it. Mangoe ( talk) 17:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Soft delete after AfD in October 2023. Undeletion requested by now blocked sock who moved to the main space. Looking closer, this needs to meet WP:NCORP and falls short based on the references not meeting WP:ORGCRIT. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Long-time unreferenced BLP. I couldn't find sources to prove notability. Boleyn ( talk) 17:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
"The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.) -- Scjessey ( talk) 01:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The most I was able to find was this profile. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 16:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This self-proclaimed 'motivational' speaker doesn't seems to meet WP:GNG. This same story also states he has "no credentials or experience." Most of the media coverage he's received stem from his controversial appointment as chairman of the Lahore Arts Council, which itself isn't a notable position or office. Additionally, while there is some press coverage on "Qasim Ali Shah" it's difficult to say if it all pertains to this same individual, given the commonality of the name in Pakistan. Moreover, considering his self-proclaimed status, it's plausible that he may have paid for promotional interviews like this one. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. I would be interested to hear from anyone who works more in this area. Boleyn ( talk) 16:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Applus+. Reliant almost entirely on primary sources. No evidence of notability per WP:NORG * Pppery * it has begun... 16:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of 1 GAME. Sources are all dead or passing mentions. No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Several refs return 404 errors. Searches reveal very little that isn't already in the article. It was a small, now failed, credit union in East Anglia. No doubt commendable in its aims but does not appear to have generated comment or review that might establish notability here. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 15:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 15:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Currently unsourced except for IMDB. Searches reveal that there were sources in the 1990s but nothing now than can be accessed. Probably needs somebody with access to a newspaper library in Manhattan to trawl through old papers. Without that, it fails WP:GNG and for the moment it is probably better to delete and re-create later if sources can be found and quoted. Velella Velella Talk 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Thanks to User:Huwmanbeing for going the extra mile on this. ( non-admin closure) Mangoe ( talk) 23:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This at first glance looks like a tiny town from the pattern of streets (namely, that there are any), but after further examination, it doesn't look right; it looks like they are really just driveways for a few properties. Anyway, every reference to it I've come across calls it a station on the Big Four, including the one cited in the article. The line is gone now, converted to a trail. Maybe someone wanted this to be a town, but I'm not finding evidence that happened. Mangoe ( talk) 14:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
A finance minister would normally pass WP:NPOL, but I assume that does not apply to the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. I could not find enough sources to fulfill WP:GNG. Broc ( talk) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to STCW Convention. Liz Read! Talk! 08:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous term. I couldn't find reliable sources to show it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As per current discussion there are two options - merging or redirect without merging. More input needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't think an additional relisting would allow us to come to a firmer consensus. Editors interested in Userfying/Draftifying or Merging can start a discussion on the article Talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS, WP:10YEARTEST, etc. This is a minor news story that spread because of social media, and will be forgotten about in ten months, never mind ten years. WP:NOTNOTABLE. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more policy based input needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A consensus was reached. Third relist was accidental. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 14:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources aside from minor mentions in lists. All other sources are self published. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 12:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "Until early 2020, she was splitting her time between her native Hong Kong and Tokyo, where she served as the driving culinary force behind a Nishiazabu restaurant backed by a Tokyo-based restaurateur and event planning consortium. When her annual contract she’d signed the year before was up for renewal, Choy found herself faced with a difficult decision: continue working as a cog in a successful, larger culinary operation or reclaim everything for herself. ... Despite the magnitude of the decision, Choy was no amateur embarking out on her own. It had been years since she had left her previous career as an office worker behind to focus on cooking, and she already had much to show for it. Choy’s 2018 cookbook, “Grace’s 60 Recipes,” earned the Best Woman Chef Book designation by the Gourmand Awards the following year, and CNN once described her private kitchen back in Hong Kong as one of that city’s best kept hidden gems. She also partners with several premium culinary brands — an explanation for all her Le Creuset cookware she puts to great use."
The article notes: "脫離打工束縛夢想不再是夢出生於新界的Grace曾於英國修讀秘書課程,畢業回港很不習慣香港急促的步伐,其後在一九九八年與丈夫Ken結婚,便隨丈夫北上打拼 ,在廣東、東北兩邊走。 二〇〇六年返港後,她要再次適應香港都市生活,她坦言仍不習慣,直至二〇〇八年她加入著名廚具品牌Miele當行政人員,仍無法綁住她一顆驛動的心 。"
From Google Translate: "The dream of escaping from the shackles of working is no longer a dream. Grace was born in the New Territories and studied secretarial courses in the UK. After graduating, she returned to Hong Kong and was not used to the fast pace of Hong Kong. Later, she married her husband Ken in 1998 and followed him north to work hard. , walking on both sides of Guangdong and Northeast China. After returning to Hong Kong in 2006, she had to adapt to urban life in Hong Kong again. She admitted that she was still not used to it. Until 2008, when she joined Miele, a famous kitchenware brand, as an administrator, she still could not restrain her heart."
The article notes: "Grace蔡孫美華非餐飲科班出身,她在英國求學時念的是祕書資料管理相關科系,畢業後也是從事祕書工作,2011年她決定創業、在元朗開了家小餐廳賣早餐與輕食,有16個座位,用餐的都是過路客。後來,她將菜色調整並將餐廳改為預約制,經《東方日報》採訪報導並給了極佳評價,自此〈蔡菜館〉打開了知名度,其後並有不同媒體跟進報導,Grace與〈蔡菜館〉成了名廚與名店。CNN將〈蔡菜館〉列入「香港十大最佳私房菜」榜單,Grace撰寫的60道菜式食譜被世界美食家大獎(Gourmand International)評為「最佳女廚師食譜」。"
From Google Translate: "Grace Cai Sun Meihua is not a catering major. When she was studying in the UK, she majored in secretarial information management. After graduation, she also worked as a secretary. In 2011, she decided to start a business and opened a small restaurant in Yuen Long selling breakfast and light meals. There are 16 seats, and the diners are all passers-by. Later, she adjusted the dishes and changed the restaurant to a reservation system. After being interviewed and reported by "Oriental Daily News" and giving excellent reviews, "Cai Cai Restaurant" became famous. Later, different media followed up and reported that Grace and "Cai Cai Restaurant" has become a famous chef and famous restaurant. CNN included "Cai Restaurant" in the "Top Ten Best Private Kitchens in Hong Kong" list, and the 60-dish recipe written by Grace was named "Best Female Chef Cookbook" by Gourmand International."
The article notes: "Grace雖沒替人把脈,卻好像中醫師一樣,很注重客人的健康,主張客人要品嚐食材原味,菜式均以簡單方法烹調,全無味精,讓客人吃得安心。 在新界長大的Grace,自小熱愛入廚,但從沒有想過將自己的事業跟興趣掛鉤,在英國讀書回港後,她一直從事文職工作十年,之後在內地幫丈夫打理生意, 回港後在廚具公司Miele工作兩年。"
From Google Translate: "Although Grace is not checking someone's pulse, she is like a Chinese medicine practitioner who pays great attention to the health of her guests and advises her guests to taste the original flavors of the ingredients. The dishes are all cooked using simple methods and contain no MSG, so that guests can eat with peace of mind. Grace, who grew up in the New Territories, has loved cooking since she was a child, but she never thought of linking her career to her hobby. After studying in the UK and returning to Hong Kong, she has been working as a clerical worker for ten years, and then helped her husband manage his business in the Mainland. After returning to Hong Kong, he worked for Miele, a kitchenware company, for two years."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to evaluate @Cunard's analyses.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 12:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get an assessment of these newly found sources? Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 14:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:ANYBIO WP:NBASIC, references are obscure running mentions or even unrelated. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination failed to establish notability. HarshalDhotre06 ( talk) 13:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Being a failed political candidate and wife of a notable politician doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. The current sourcing is totally inadequate, and I couldn't find any better. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Govvy ( talk) 13:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I merged some content into Beni Ebeid article. At the moment I don't see enough WP:SIGCOV for this football club to have it's own article. Unless I am proven wrong, I fail to see how this needs it's own page. Suggest a redirect to Beni Ebeid. Govvy ( talk) 10:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 10:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)The result was no consensus. A Merger discussion can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 09:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:BLAR. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Poast. The contention is that it is a non-notable message board. (Administrative nomination: I have no opinion on whether the article should be kept.) Anarchyte ( talk) 07:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. The sources in the Equipment section are about the vehicles in the movie in general, while the character creation section is just two bullet points trivia. In other words, no substantial information to warrant an article. He's just a supporting character after all. Neocorelight ( Talk) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Many listed are not called "Genocides". Simply not a topic/article for mainspace creation in its current state.....should at least be moved to draft because of the contentious nature of the topic that has no sources elevating many items here to genocide. Article scope is all over the place under a very contentious title that is simple not ready for public viewing in any manner. Moxy🍁 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. If editors wish to explore a rename of this article, please start a discussion on the article talk page or go to RM and make your case there. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This should be a renaming to Kurumbathur ; It can be seen that it includes all the information of Kurumbathur village in Malappuram district under the Kerala State Village Department, no source is available here that there is a village with the current name (Vettichira), Vettichira is a small town so some of this information is written here without source,, it fails WP:GEOLAND ~ Spworld2 ( talk) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. AfD is not a place for accusing others of being Sockspuppets. I am closing as no-consensus due to the lack of policy-based discussion about the article. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 14:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete or redirect to Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa. Out of the 5 sources on this page, only 2 are reliable; Hari Ram Gupta and Rishi Singh. The two other sources: "Journal of the United Service Institution of India" as well as "Selections from the records of the government of Punjab" are WP:RAJ era sources written in the 1800s, so under no circumstances can we use them. The last source is a Google books snapshot with no preview available either on Google books or anywhere else on the Internet. Such snapshots have been deprecated in the reliable sources noticeboard.
The coverage in both Hari Ram Gupta's and Rishi Singh's work, the extent of which are only small, singular paragraphs does not justify an entire Wikipedia article and fails Wikipedia's standards for notability- [23] Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 10:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
"Having failed at Peshawar, Sayyid Ahmad planned to seize Attock fort from the Sikhs. Its possession by him would automatically clear Hazara and Peshawar from the Sikhs, and it would open the gateway for the invasion of the Panjab. Khadi Khan of Hund secretly alerted the Sikh commander of the fort, and the plan fell through. Sayyid Ahmad, in anger attacked the village Haidru, and put to the sword all the inhabitants, both Hindus and Muslims. On hearing this news Hari Singh Nalwa suddenly appeared on the scene and massacred nearly three-fourths of Khalifa's Ghazis. Sayyid Ahmad managed to escape to the west of the Indus."
"It appears that even when he seemed successful, Syed Ahmad began losing his control over the tribal leadership. Many tribal chiefs began betraying him. For instance, at the time of taking over the fort of Attock, Khadi Khan of Hund alerted the Sikh commander, Hari Singh Nalwa, who with his 20,000 men attacked Syed Ahmad’s forces and killed three-fourths of the Khalifa’s Ghazis".
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It is not appropriate to accuse an editor of being a sockpuppet in an AFD discussion. If you have concerns, file a case at SPI. If there is no confirmation of sockpuppetry through an SPI, then you are just trying to tarnish the reputation of an editor which is a personal attack. Please conduct a discussion elsewhere.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
A very popular singer, but a Non-notable album. The article was deleted twice in the Russian Wikipedia [27] [28].-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 07:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd and at AFD before so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd and at AFD (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse (Valery Leontiev album)) so Soft Deletion is not an option. This AFD page actually has to be moved as it links to the first AFD, not its own page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
He's a TV host but he fails to meet relevant WP:JOURNALIST as well basic WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 09:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NORG due to a lack of significant coverage discussing the organization. Let'srun ( talk) 02:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced since its creation in 2002. Couldn't find sources using the term in the programming sense used here. Doesn't seem notable. jlwoodwa ( talk) 01:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. Looks like an advert, and the sourcing I found is mainly PR like stories. The industry recognition hardly adds to notability. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar ( talk) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. Limited google news hits and article solely based on primary sources. LibStar ( talk) 04:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable turkish actress in non notable tv shows, does not meet WP:ENT - blue link shows are also not notable LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 20:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The only alternative would be no consensus, which still keeps the article. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
A large majority of this page is not cited. The only citation is from the website of the subject. The other archived citation does not appear to mention or be related to the subject. I believe this biography has been self published as it is largely plagiarised from the subject's own event listings: https://www.eventfinda.com.au/2020/gwyn-ashton/melbourne/thornbury
This article has other multiple issues: The topic of this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music. (May 2023)
This biography of a living person needs citations for verification, as its only attribution is to self-published sources; articles should not be based solely on such sources. (May 2023)
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V260z ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 06:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Upon an attempt to find out more on artist, found a post on subject's Facebook page asking for help to save this page, asking others to edit page and nominate page for keeping on his behalf, in addition to comments mentioning he wrote his own article. I suggest this article be marked as a COI, whilst being considered for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V260z ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this page for deletion for not establishing its notability in 2022 and I've now realised it has been recreated. Admittedly, the article now has more sources than it did then but as can be seen from the table below, there are still no sources that count towards GNG or ORGCRIT. They are almost all either small local newspapers or specialist trade publications. In any case, the sources either largely depend on quotes or read like press releases. It should be deleted.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pitchbook ( https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/128856-34#overview) | ? Unknown where Pitchbook gets their info from but doubtful it is independent. | WP:ORGTRIV Merely an entry into a database | ✘ No | |
International Bakery Article ( https://in-bakery.com/lesserevil-collaborates-with-rind-snacks/) | The article consists largely (though) not entirely of quotes | IB seems to be an indutry blog largely publishing press releases, not a secondary source as such | barely | ✘ No |
The Journal News, White Plains NY article ( https://www.newspapers.com/image/166431624/?clipping_id=131265720&fcfToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJmcmVlLXZpZXctaWQiOjE2NjQzMTYyNCwiaWF0IjoxNzEyMDc2MjcyLCJleHAiOjE3MTIxNjI2NzJ9.p5UIjOhpxTsTgxJjWAhxUUrtn66o7Rfk9j7GFrpgnRA) | Consists largely of quotes and reads like a press release | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | WP:AUD the newspaper's audience is too local | ✘ No |
Stamford Advocate article ( https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/judges-like-what-they-savor-in-lesserevil-3442484.php) | Consists largely of quotes and reads like a press release | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | In any event, WP:AUD the newspaper's audience is too local | ✘ No |
Own company website history | Obviously the co's own coverage is not independent | ✘ No | ||
Hatford Business Journal article ( https://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article/nearing-100m-in-annual-revenues-cts-lesserevil-expands-organic-snack-foods-line-readies-new) | Large quotes and the article simply rattles off facts that likely came from the company, not much evidence of their own journalism but not as quote-heavy as some of the others | ? The HBJ seems to largely publish press releases, but I am unsure about its journalistic practices | Very doubtful about its circulation per WP:AUD but the coverage is more in-depth than the other articles | ✘ No |
Danbury daily voice article ( https://dailyvoice.com/connecticut/danbury/business/lesserevil-snacks-opens-a-new-factory-in-danbury/580408/) | Largely quotes | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | WP:AUD local newspaper | ✘ No |
Danbury's Financial Report | Presumable | I presume it is | The City of Danbury's financial report is not significant is a primary source | ✘ No |
Nosh article ( https://www.nosh.com/news/2020/lesserevil-moves-into-new-categories-expands-distribution/) | Many quotes; reads like a press release | Reads like a press release | It's a specialist trade blog/magazine | ✘ No |
Foodbusiness news article ( https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/21129-lesserevil-enters-bar-category-with-acquisition-of-redd-bar) | Mostly quotes | Reads like a press release | It's a specialist trade blog/magazine | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
At least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary. ~ A412 talk! 18:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Companies do not inherit notability from their products.
In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article. This article can be the name of the company or the name of its product, depending on which is the primary topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More analysis of the sources that have been added would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Invader Zim#Characters. This will have to be a Merge, not a Redirect, as this section of this article is empty save a link to the article under discussion here. There might be calls for a split later but that debate can happen after a Merge takes place. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability in what appears to be simply fan-cruft. Sources are blogs, IMDB, a single fanzine and a 404 error. Little value in merging into Invader Zim as no evidence of any encyclopaedic value here. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There seems to be consensus forming for merge or redirect as an ATD, but no consensus for either yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 01:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. / Nom withdrawn per my note here. We don't need to spend a week on this. Star Mississippi 02:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
I would normally redirect this to Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Charleston#Education as an ATD, but it survived AfD at a very different time for school discussions. I do not see evidence the school meets current guidelines as sourcing is neither in depth nor fully independent. No objection with a redirect, but didn't think it to be BLAR appropriate. Star Mississippi 01:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
... Cardinal Newman, successor to famed Ursuline Academy, began classes in spring of 1961...That is a passing mention in itself but it indicates there will be more. The writer believed that Ursuline Academy was famous, and thus, presumably, notable. I also found a self published document which has a description of the history alluded to above, although sources are not given. This is a WP:SPS so not reliable as it stands. Indeed, when I tried to link it, the edit was refused as it is on a blacklisted site. So definitely not a WP:RS in that form. The blacklisted document is a Word doc, filename zc+The+Ursulines+during+the+Civil+War+Article+34+(1) - no author given. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)URSULINE CONVENT.
All records, from the date of foundation by Rev. J. J. O'Conndl in Columbia in 1858 to the burning of Columbia by Sherman in 1865, when the Convent was burned, were destroyed. Shortly after the war steps were taken to rebuild and refurnish the school, and now the Convent stands on the corner of Assembly Street and Hampton Avenue, a monument to their devotion to education by the Catholics of the State. It is a commodious and handsome building, furnished with all modem equipments and the best sanitary arrangements, thoroughly heated and well ventilated. The grounds are ample for outdoor exercise, which is required by the rules of the Academy to take, and which the delightful climate renders pleasant I throughout the year. In point of health and beauty, Columbia does not yield to any Southern city; hence the Academy is URSULINE ACADEMY. ideally situated and attracts students from other sections. In admission of students no distinction is made on account of creed, nor is any undue influence used over their religious principles. The institution is chartered by the Legislature of South Carolina, and is empowered to confer degrees and diplomas. The Convent is under control of the Right Rev. Bishop Northrop and the Mother Superior, Mother Angela Broomfield, and a high class of education is furnished.
I hope that the nominator is not on some sort of crusade to delete articles on high schools.I think this picks up all of my AfD noms of late. I think you'll see I'm not on a crusade to delete anything although I'm sure I've nominated schools along with every topic in my time here. I simply found it when looking at some other SC schools and wasn't convinced on notability. Nothing more, nothing less. While Necrothesp and Sirfurboy and I sometimes see content from a different POV, I think they'd both tell you anything I put forward is in good faith. Star Mississippi 12:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what a school in a Massachusetts suburb has to do with anything- what does that refer to? I found a different Ursuline Academy in Texas, but I think all the sources I mentioned were for South Carolina. Have I mixed any up? As to good faith - definitely no concerns on that score. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 13:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
It should be obvious that a Catholic high school dating back to 1858 in the American South, where Catholics were rare and were sometimes lynched, isn't going to be like a run-of-the-mill high school founded in 1958 in a suburb of Boston.Maybe something lost in translation on my end. Anyway, thanks for your research and note @ Sirfurboy. Withdrawing on the grounds that sufficient sourcing exists to indicate there is more not as easily accessible but 99.99% confirmed to exist. Star Mississippi 02:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 00:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Articles about a film and its director, not
properly sourced as having strong claims to passing
WP:NFILM. The attempted notability claim is that it was one of the first films (according to the film article) and/or the very first film (according to the BLP) to feature a lead actor with Down syndrome, but this isn't properly sourced, and isn't "inherently" notable without sourcing -- but the film article otherwise stacks a bunch of student film awards that do not receive media coverage for the purposes of being able to make their winners notable for winning them, while the BLP doesn't actually make any other notability claims at all besides the existence of this film. Meanwhile, the film's article is "referenced" entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, while the BLP is entirely unsourced -- and there are
conflict of interest issues, as the director has edited the film's article in the past and was the creator of his own BLP in defiance of
WP:AUTOBIO.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt either the film or the director from having to pass
WP:GNG on their sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk) 00:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is against this article remaining. @ BD2412: if you want to work on this in draft space (nor or down the road) feel free to ping me for it. No need to go through REFUND. I just don't want this to die a G13 if no one is able now. Star Mississippi 00:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This "list of unicorns in modern popular culture, chiefly literature, film and television" is an
INDISCRIMINATE collection of
TRIVIA which doesn't meet standalone list notability standards. The article lacks citations, and contains no indication this list topic has ever been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
as required per
NLIST.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC) See also
MOS:TRIVIA and
WP:POPCULTURE.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just giving this discussion a bit more time. But I have no idea what "wp:not redirects" refers to as it doesn't correspond to a policy page/section, at least none I could find.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Antenna TV affiliates#West Virginia. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 00:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref BLP. When looking for sources, I couldn't find sufficient to indicate he is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 21:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to EBSA European Under-18 Snooker Championship. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. All refs are affiliated. Under 18 sporting events are rarely notable and this one fails WP:GNG searches revealed next to nothing. Velella Velella Talk 22:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep, as no one has challenged (5 days) the sources used to improve the article. This moves consensus to keep per strength of arguments. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable salad that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 23:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Zero notability whatsoever InDimensional ( talk) 22:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ju-jitsu at the 2001 World Games – Men's fighting −77 kg. as an ATD. Personally, I won't do IAR AFD closures. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (sports) LouisOrr27 ( talk) 21:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Lacking secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Current sources are the FCC, radio-locator.com, and Broadcasting Yearbook. These do not demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (Sources should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability) AusLondonder ( talk) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to get more feedback on additions to this article since the nomination. I don't see more support for Deletion here so it looks like the realistic options are Keep or Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced, lack of notability, was unable to find any reliable sources discussing this game. Article has been tagged for notability concerns since 2013. Waxworker ( talk) 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Rapture (BioShock). Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This character looks a bit popular for Bioshock. But before the result shows only merchandise and costume or being cosplayed. This source is a bit good [1], but it looks like another typical listicle with a short commentary. Nothing else. I may be wrong at Google Scholar thou. Greenish Pickle! ( 🔔) 23:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of ports in the United States. Liz Read! Talk! 20:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Merge with United States container ports or List of ports in the United States? Article overlaps with and isn't distinct enough from the other two. मल्ल ( talk) 14:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Bible Presbyterian Church. Liz Read! Talk! 20:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Micro-denomination with two churches. Citations are exclusively to primary sources or to outdated sources of questionable independence and reliability. Participants in the 2013 AfD discussion highlighted the availability of coverage in Melton's Encyclopedia of American Religions (8th edition, 2009), page 252, but the coverage is so cursory that I do not believe it qualifies as "encyclopedic" coverage for purposes of establishing notability. (Citations to the two-paragraph Melton mention were never added in the first place.) The Melton source is based on a list of Reformed entities, most of which are not notable, published in 1999 ( see here). I cannot identify other independent, secondary, reliable sources that verify the notability of this denomination. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 17:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of mayors of Cairns. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
So, mayors are not inherently notable under WP:NPOL, neither in WP:NSUBPOL. They have to pass WP:GNG to qualify for a standalone entry. This is currently not the case here as this subject fails GNG as a matter of fact. The current sources, with the exception of Cairnes Post, do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV. This is supposed to be simple for someone who understands WP:NPOL works. Cairns as a city is not significantly large based on population census. Overall, mayors should simply not be kept if they do not pass WP:GNG all in the name of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just to be fair, a WP:BEFORE did not return anything useful also. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 21:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
...I contend mayors of significant population centres are notable...– If that's your belief, one which I don't believe is widely held, then you should propose an amendment to WP:NPOL. As of now, that's simply not how it works. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Super Mario. This is pretty evenly split but the informal source analysis helped tilt this to a Redirect closure rather than another relisting. My hope is that since the content remains, an editor(s) can get going on creating Super Mario Universe and later Merge this content into that new article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Procedural listing. This was
WP:BLARed, restored, then BLARed a second time, and per that page, Most users believe that AfD should be used to settle controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting
. ~
A412
talk! 23:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion is divided between Keep and Redirect as implied by the nominator. A source analysis would be helpful since improvements have been made to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nom is blocked for sockpuppetry. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 22:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Article about a non-notable actress and model. Doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:BLP1E as model. Fails notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vellore Aarathi ( talk • contribs) 16:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I want to see if there is more support for a Keep. Though why the nominator is citing
WP:NPOL is beyond me.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete: No sources of her in recent times, truely unaware if she is even in the entertainment industry anymore. Delete this article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Isha.Narain (
talk •
contribs) 05:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Blocked sock puppet.
PhilKnight (
talk) 11:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I tend to favor ATD but I don't think The Game of Life/Yahtzee/Payday is a likely search term for readers. I think it would be better to create separate Redirects for each game or provide a link on the main game articles to the Game Boy Advance games article. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Did an extensive search, found only one review: [6] Otherwise, there's almost no coverage. Also checked print sources, only to find brief mentions of it in a couple Nintendo Power magazines. Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 22:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. Also, underwent a 10Kb expansion. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
I doubt the encyclopedic value of the article, but if it must remain, I am in favor of moving it as a subheading to the " Martin Coogan" article. Redivy ( talk) 22:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
BLP of someone known purely as an unsuccessful candidate for a state legislature. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. AusLondonder ( talk) 22:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. partially because of the lack of a compelling deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I think " Legislature of Guam" should be given as a subheading and also deleted. Redivy ( talk) 22:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be recreated as a DAB if subjects with this last name end up with articles Star Mississippi 00:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable surname. There are no articles on English Wikipedia for a person with this surname (or variant thereof), and only one article on German Wikipedia for a person with a variant of this surname ( de:Laura Ufermann). toweli ( talk) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 20:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. and Redirect to Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) season 17. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
No notable roles, non-significant roles in two series thereby clearly failing WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. No significant coverage and sources thereby, failing WP:SIGCOV as well. Imsaneikigai ( talk) 19:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sun Life Financial#India. Liz Read! Talk! 23:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This company page fails to meet WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH, as most of its citations focus on trivial coverage according to WP:ORGTRIV. TCBT1CSI ( talk) 12:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 19:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable Russian producer with some of the oldest citation needed templates on Wikipedia - and no sources I could find to answer them. Not to be confused with the eponymous Dutch producer [11]. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 19:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Could be something in non-English sources but from what I see on the page and what I can find in a search, this company fails WP:ORGCRIT. Sources fail to meet WP:ORGCRIT. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. as there is opposition to a Redirect. Editors can try creating one on their own if they so choose. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Another former mayor of Cairns Region who does not meet point 2 of WP:NPOL and does not appear to meet WP:GNG. As a local elected official, they are not considered inherently notable and the coverage that I'm finding all appears to be fairly routine. This person also has a shortened term (4 months) compared to most mayors because they were appointed to the position to finish out the term of the retiring mayor and then lost re-election. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Botswana Twenty20 International cricketers. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Botswana Twenty20 International cricketers. The closest thing approaching WP:SIGCOV that I found was coverage about his unique bowling action ( 1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 17:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The location of Kern, Kirtley & Herr, site of "a century-old tradition of manufacturing and selling feeds for numerous species of farm animals and pets." This is a rail spot; the siding has been severed, but its position next to the tracks remains the same as the complex has mutated and expanded across the road, the only significant structures back into the early 1950s. There's no sign there was ever a town around it. Mangoe ( talk) 17:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Soft delete after AfD in October 2023. Undeletion requested by now blocked sock who moved to the main space. Looking closer, this needs to meet WP:NCORP and falls short based on the references not meeting WP:ORGCRIT. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Long-time unreferenced BLP. I couldn't find sources to prove notability. Boleyn ( talk) 17:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
"The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.) -- Scjessey ( talk) 01:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. The most I was able to find was this profile. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 16:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 16:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This self-proclaimed 'motivational' speaker doesn't seems to meet WP:GNG. This same story also states he has "no credentials or experience." Most of the media coverage he's received stem from his controversial appointment as chairman of the Lahore Arts Council, which itself isn't a notable position or office. Additionally, while there is some press coverage on "Qasim Ali Shah" it's difficult to say if it all pertains to this same individual, given the commonality of the name in Pakistan. Moreover, considering his self-proclaimed status, it's plausible that he may have paid for promotional interviews like this one. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 16:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. I would be interested to hear from anyone who works more in this area. Boleyn ( talk) 16:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of Applus+. Reliant almost entirely on primary sources. No evidence of notability per WP:NORG * Pppery * it has begun... 16:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Salt evasion of 1 GAME. Sources are all dead or passing mentions. No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. Several refs return 404 errors. Searches reveal very little that isn't already in the article. It was a small, now failed, credit union in East Anglia. No doubt commendable in its aims but does not appear to have generated comment or review that might establish notability here. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 15:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 15:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Currently unsourced except for IMDB. Searches reveal that there were sources in the 1990s but nothing now than can be accessed. Probably needs somebody with access to a newspaper library in Manhattan to trawl through old papers. Without that, it fails WP:GNG and for the moment it is probably better to delete and re-create later if sources can be found and quoted. Velella Velella Talk 14:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn. Thanks to User:Huwmanbeing for going the extra mile on this. ( non-admin closure) Mangoe ( talk) 23:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
This at first glance looks like a tiny town from the pattern of streets (namely, that there are any), but after further examination, it doesn't look right; it looks like they are really just driveways for a few properties. Anyway, every reference to it I've come across calls it a station on the Big Four, including the one cited in the article. The line is gone now, converted to a trail. Maybe someone wanted this to be a town, but I'm not finding evidence that happened. Mangoe ( talk) 14:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
A finance minister would normally pass WP:NPOL, but I assume that does not apply to the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. I could not find enough sources to fulfill WP:GNG. Broc ( talk) 14:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to STCW Convention. Liz Read! Talk! 08:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Ambiguous term. I couldn't find reliable sources to show it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As per current discussion there are two options - merging or redirect without merging. More input needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't think an additional relisting would allow us to come to a firmer consensus. Editors interested in Userfying/Draftifying or Merging can start a discussion on the article Talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS, WP:10YEARTEST, etc. This is a minor news story that spread because of social media, and will be forgotten about in ten months, never mind ten years. WP:NOTNOTABLE. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: more policy based input needed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Less Unless (
talk) 14:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A consensus was reached. Third relist was accidental. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 14:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources aside from minor mentions in lists. All other sources are self published. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 12:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "Until early 2020, she was splitting her time between her native Hong Kong and Tokyo, where she served as the driving culinary force behind a Nishiazabu restaurant backed by a Tokyo-based restaurateur and event planning consortium. When her annual contract she’d signed the year before was up for renewal, Choy found herself faced with a difficult decision: continue working as a cog in a successful, larger culinary operation or reclaim everything for herself. ... Despite the magnitude of the decision, Choy was no amateur embarking out on her own. It had been years since she had left her previous career as an office worker behind to focus on cooking, and she already had much to show for it. Choy’s 2018 cookbook, “Grace’s 60 Recipes,” earned the Best Woman Chef Book designation by the Gourmand Awards the following year, and CNN once described her private kitchen back in Hong Kong as one of that city’s best kept hidden gems. She also partners with several premium culinary brands — an explanation for all her Le Creuset cookware she puts to great use."
The article notes: "脫離打工束縛夢想不再是夢出生於新界的Grace曾於英國修讀秘書課程,畢業回港很不習慣香港急促的步伐,其後在一九九八年與丈夫Ken結婚,便隨丈夫北上打拼 ,在廣東、東北兩邊走。 二〇〇六年返港後,她要再次適應香港都市生活,她坦言仍不習慣,直至二〇〇八年她加入著名廚具品牌Miele當行政人員,仍無法綁住她一顆驛動的心 。"
From Google Translate: "The dream of escaping from the shackles of working is no longer a dream. Grace was born in the New Territories and studied secretarial courses in the UK. After graduating, she returned to Hong Kong and was not used to the fast pace of Hong Kong. Later, she married her husband Ken in 1998 and followed him north to work hard. , walking on both sides of Guangdong and Northeast China. After returning to Hong Kong in 2006, she had to adapt to urban life in Hong Kong again. She admitted that she was still not used to it. Until 2008, when she joined Miele, a famous kitchenware brand, as an administrator, she still could not restrain her heart."
The article notes: "Grace蔡孫美華非餐飲科班出身,她在英國求學時念的是祕書資料管理相關科系,畢業後也是從事祕書工作,2011年她決定創業、在元朗開了家小餐廳賣早餐與輕食,有16個座位,用餐的都是過路客。後來,她將菜色調整並將餐廳改為預約制,經《東方日報》採訪報導並給了極佳評價,自此〈蔡菜館〉打開了知名度,其後並有不同媒體跟進報導,Grace與〈蔡菜館〉成了名廚與名店。CNN將〈蔡菜館〉列入「香港十大最佳私房菜」榜單,Grace撰寫的60道菜式食譜被世界美食家大獎(Gourmand International)評為「最佳女廚師食譜」。"
From Google Translate: "Grace Cai Sun Meihua is not a catering major. When she was studying in the UK, she majored in secretarial information management. After graduation, she also worked as a secretary. In 2011, she decided to start a business and opened a small restaurant in Yuen Long selling breakfast and light meals. There are 16 seats, and the diners are all passers-by. Later, she adjusted the dishes and changed the restaurant to a reservation system. After being interviewed and reported by "Oriental Daily News" and giving excellent reviews, "Cai Cai Restaurant" became famous. Later, different media followed up and reported that Grace and "Cai Cai Restaurant" has become a famous chef and famous restaurant. CNN included "Cai Restaurant" in the "Top Ten Best Private Kitchens in Hong Kong" list, and the 60-dish recipe written by Grace was named "Best Female Chef Cookbook" by Gourmand International."
The article notes: "Grace雖沒替人把脈,卻好像中醫師一樣,很注重客人的健康,主張客人要品嚐食材原味,菜式均以簡單方法烹調,全無味精,讓客人吃得安心。 在新界長大的Grace,自小熱愛入廚,但從沒有想過將自己的事業跟興趣掛鉤,在英國讀書回港後,她一直從事文職工作十年,之後在內地幫丈夫打理生意, 回港後在廚具公司Miele工作兩年。"
From Google Translate: "Although Grace is not checking someone's pulse, she is like a Chinese medicine practitioner who pays great attention to the health of her guests and advises her guests to taste the original flavors of the ingredients. The dishes are all cooked using simple methods and contain no MSG, so that guests can eat with peace of mind. Grace, who grew up in the New Territories, has loved cooking since she was a child, but she never thought of linking her career to her hobby. After studying in the UK and returning to Hong Kong, she has been working as a clerical worker for ten years, and then helped her husband manage his business in the Mainland. After returning to Hong Kong, he worked for Miele, a kitchenware company, for two years."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be helpful to evaluate @Cunard's analyses.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 12:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we get an assessment of these newly found sources? Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 14:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun ( talk) 12:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
non-notable per WP:ANYBIO WP:NBASIC, references are obscure running mentions or even unrelated. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits ( T) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination failed to establish notability. HarshalDhotre06 ( talk) 13:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Being a failed political candidate and wife of a notable politician doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. The current sourcing is totally inadequate, and I couldn't find any better. Clarityfiend ( talk) 10:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Govvy ( talk) 13:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I merged some content into Beni Ebeid article. At the moment I don't see enough WP:SIGCOV for this football club to have it's own article. Unless I am proven wrong, I fail to see how this needs it's own page. Suggest a redirect to Beni Ebeid. Govvy ( talk) 10:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 10:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)The result was no consensus. A Merger discussion can occur on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 09:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested WP:BLAR. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 3#Poast. The contention is that it is a non-notable message board. (Administrative nomination: I have no opinion on whether the article should be kept.) Anarchyte ( talk) 07:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Not notable. The sources in the Equipment section are about the vehicles in the movie in general, while the character creation section is just two bullet points trivia. In other words, no substantial information to warrant an article. He's just a supporting character after all. Neocorelight ( Talk) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Many listed are not called "Genocides". Simply not a topic/article for mainspace creation in its current state.....should at least be moved to draft because of the contentious nature of the topic that has no sources elevating many items here to genocide. Article scope is all over the place under a very contentious title that is simple not ready for public viewing in any manner. Moxy🍁 05:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. If editors wish to explore a rename of this article, please start a discussion on the article talk page or go to RM and make your case there. Liz Read! Talk! 20:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
This should be a renaming to Kurumbathur ; It can be seen that it includes all the information of Kurumbathur village in Malappuram district under the Kerala State Village Department, no source is available here that there is a village with the current name (Vettichira), Vettichira is a small town so some of this information is written here without source,, it fails WP:GEOLAND ~ Spworld2 ( talk) 15:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. AfD is not a place for accusing others of being Sockspuppets. I am closing as no-consensus due to the lack of policy-based discussion about the article. (non-admin closure) Shadow311 ( talk) 14:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete or redirect to Military campaigns of Hari Singh Nalwa. Out of the 5 sources on this page, only 2 are reliable; Hari Ram Gupta and Rishi Singh. The two other sources: "Journal of the United Service Institution of India" as well as "Selections from the records of the government of Punjab" are WP:RAJ era sources written in the 1800s, so under no circumstances can we use them. The last source is a Google books snapshot with no preview available either on Google books or anywhere else on the Internet. Such snapshots have been deprecated in the reliable sources noticeboard.
The coverage in both Hari Ram Gupta's and Rishi Singh's work, the extent of which are only small, singular paragraphs does not justify an entire Wikipedia article and fails Wikipedia's standards for notability- [23] Southasianhistorian8 ( talk) 10:51, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
"Having failed at Peshawar, Sayyid Ahmad planned to seize Attock fort from the Sikhs. Its possession by him would automatically clear Hazara and Peshawar from the Sikhs, and it would open the gateway for the invasion of the Panjab. Khadi Khan of Hund secretly alerted the Sikh commander of the fort, and the plan fell through. Sayyid Ahmad, in anger attacked the village Haidru, and put to the sword all the inhabitants, both Hindus and Muslims. On hearing this news Hari Singh Nalwa suddenly appeared on the scene and massacred nearly three-fourths of Khalifa's Ghazis. Sayyid Ahmad managed to escape to the west of the Indus."
"It appears that even when he seemed successful, Syed Ahmad began losing his control over the tribal leadership. Many tribal chiefs began betraying him. For instance, at the time of taking over the fort of Attock, Khadi Khan of Hund alerted the Sikh commander, Hari Singh Nalwa, who with his 20,000 men attacked Syed Ahmad’s forces and killed three-fourths of the Khalifa’s Ghazis".
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It is not appropriate to accuse an editor of being a sockpuppet in an AFD discussion. If you have concerns, file a case at SPI. If there is no confirmation of sockpuppetry through an SPI, then you are just trying to tarnish the reputation of an editor which is a personal attack. Please conduct a discussion elsewhere.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
A very popular singer, but a Non-notable album. The article was deleted twice in the Russian Wikipedia [27] [28].-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 07:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Already PROD'd and at AFD before so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd and at AFD (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse (Valery Leontiev album)) so Soft Deletion is not an option. This AFD page actually has to be moved as it links to the first AFD, not its own page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
He's a TV host but he fails to meet relevant WP:JOURNALIST as well basic WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 09:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NORG due to a lack of significant coverage discussing the organization. Let'srun ( talk) 02:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced since its creation in 2002. Couldn't find sources using the term in the programming sense used here. Doesn't seem notable. jlwoodwa ( talk) 01:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 20:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Created by a single purpose editor. Looks like an advert, and the sourcing I found is mainly PR like stories. The industry recognition hardly adds to notability. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar ( talk) 01:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 03:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. Limited google news hits and article solely based on primary sources. LibStar ( talk) 04:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non notable turkish actress in non notable tv shows, does not meet WP:ENT - blue link shows are also not notable LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 20:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The only alternative would be no consensus, which still keeps the article. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
A large majority of this page is not cited. The only citation is from the website of the subject. The other archived citation does not appear to mention or be related to the subject. I believe this biography has been self published as it is largely plagiarised from the subject's own event listings: https://www.eventfinda.com.au/2020/gwyn-ashton/melbourne/thornbury
This article has other multiple issues: The topic of this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music. (May 2023)
This biography of a living person needs citations for verification, as its only attribution is to self-published sources; articles should not be based solely on such sources. (May 2023)
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V260z ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 06:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Upon an attempt to find out more on artist, found a post on subject's Facebook page asking for help to save this page, asking others to edit page and nominate page for keeping on his behalf, in addition to comments mentioning he wrote his own article. I suggest this article be marked as a COI, whilst being considered for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V260z ( talk • contribs) 16:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 04:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I nominated this page for deletion for not establishing its notability in 2022 and I've now realised it has been recreated. Admittedly, the article now has more sources than it did then but as can be seen from the table below, there are still no sources that count towards GNG or ORGCRIT. They are almost all either small local newspapers or specialist trade publications. In any case, the sources either largely depend on quotes or read like press releases. It should be deleted.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pitchbook ( https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/128856-34#overview) | ? Unknown where Pitchbook gets their info from but doubtful it is independent. | WP:ORGTRIV Merely an entry into a database | ✘ No | |
International Bakery Article ( https://in-bakery.com/lesserevil-collaborates-with-rind-snacks/) | The article consists largely (though) not entirely of quotes | IB seems to be an indutry blog largely publishing press releases, not a secondary source as such | barely | ✘ No |
The Journal News, White Plains NY article ( https://www.newspapers.com/image/166431624/?clipping_id=131265720&fcfToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJmcmVlLXZpZXctaWQiOjE2NjQzMTYyNCwiaWF0IjoxNzEyMDc2MjcyLCJleHAiOjE3MTIxNjI2NzJ9.p5UIjOhpxTsTgxJjWAhxUUrtn66o7Rfk9j7GFrpgnRA) | Consists largely of quotes and reads like a press release | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | WP:AUD the newspaper's audience is too local | ✘ No |
Stamford Advocate article ( https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/judges-like-what-they-savor-in-lesserevil-3442484.php) | Consists largely of quotes and reads like a press release | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | In any event, WP:AUD the newspaper's audience is too local | ✘ No |
Own company website history | Obviously the co's own coverage is not independent | ✘ No | ||
Hatford Business Journal article ( https://www.hartfordbusiness.com/article/nearing-100m-in-annual-revenues-cts-lesserevil-expands-organic-snack-foods-line-readies-new) | Large quotes and the article simply rattles off facts that likely came from the company, not much evidence of their own journalism but not as quote-heavy as some of the others | ? The HBJ seems to largely publish press releases, but I am unsure about its journalistic practices | Very doubtful about its circulation per WP:AUD but the coverage is more in-depth than the other articles | ✘ No |
Danbury daily voice article ( https://dailyvoice.com/connecticut/danbury/business/lesserevil-snacks-opens-a-new-factory-in-danbury/580408/) | Largely quotes | ? I assume the Newspaper in question is reliable but I don't know | WP:AUD local newspaper | ✘ No |
Danbury's Financial Report | Presumable | I presume it is | The City of Danbury's financial report is not significant is a primary source | ✘ No |
Nosh article ( https://www.nosh.com/news/2020/lesserevil-moves-into-new-categories-expands-distribution/) | Many quotes; reads like a press release | Reads like a press release | It's a specialist trade blog/magazine | ✘ No |
Foodbusiness news article ( https://www.foodbusinessnews.net/articles/21129-lesserevil-enters-bar-category-with-acquisition-of-redd-bar) | Mostly quotes | Reads like a press release | It's a specialist trade blog/magazine | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
At least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary. ~ A412 talk! 18:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Companies do not inherit notability from their products.
In cases where a company is mainly known for a single series of products or services, it is usually better to cover the company and its products/services in the same article. This article can be the name of the company or the name of its product, depending on which is the primary topic.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More analysis of the sources that have been added would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Invader Zim#Characters. This will have to be a Merge, not a Redirect, as this section of this article is empty save a link to the article under discussion here. There might be calls for a split later but that debate can happen after a Merge takes place. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability in what appears to be simply fan-cruft. Sources are blogs, IMDB, a single fanzine and a 404 error. Little value in merging into Invader Zim as no evidence of any encyclopaedic value here. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There seems to be consensus forming for merge or redirect as an ATD, but no consensus for either yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
voorts (
talk/
contributions) 01:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. / Nom withdrawn per my note here. We don't need to spend a week on this. Star Mississippi 02:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
I would normally redirect this to Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Charleston#Education as an ATD, but it survived AfD at a very different time for school discussions. I do not see evidence the school meets current guidelines as sourcing is neither in depth nor fully independent. No objection with a redirect, but didn't think it to be BLAR appropriate. Star Mississippi 01:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
... Cardinal Newman, successor to famed Ursuline Academy, began classes in spring of 1961...That is a passing mention in itself but it indicates there will be more. The writer believed that Ursuline Academy was famous, and thus, presumably, notable. I also found a self published document which has a description of the history alluded to above, although sources are not given. This is a WP:SPS so not reliable as it stands. Indeed, when I tried to link it, the edit was refused as it is on a blacklisted site. So definitely not a WP:RS in that form. The blacklisted document is a Word doc, filename zc+The+Ursulines+during+the+Civil+War+Article+34+(1) - no author given. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)URSULINE CONVENT.
All records, from the date of foundation by Rev. J. J. O'Conndl in Columbia in 1858 to the burning of Columbia by Sherman in 1865, when the Convent was burned, were destroyed. Shortly after the war steps were taken to rebuild and refurnish the school, and now the Convent stands on the corner of Assembly Street and Hampton Avenue, a monument to their devotion to education by the Catholics of the State. It is a commodious and handsome building, furnished with all modem equipments and the best sanitary arrangements, thoroughly heated and well ventilated. The grounds are ample for outdoor exercise, which is required by the rules of the Academy to take, and which the delightful climate renders pleasant I throughout the year. In point of health and beauty, Columbia does not yield to any Southern city; hence the Academy is URSULINE ACADEMY. ideally situated and attracts students from other sections. In admission of students no distinction is made on account of creed, nor is any undue influence used over their religious principles. The institution is chartered by the Legislature of South Carolina, and is empowered to confer degrees and diplomas. The Convent is under control of the Right Rev. Bishop Northrop and the Mother Superior, Mother Angela Broomfield, and a high class of education is furnished.
I hope that the nominator is not on some sort of crusade to delete articles on high schools.I think this picks up all of my AfD noms of late. I think you'll see I'm not on a crusade to delete anything although I'm sure I've nominated schools along with every topic in my time here. I simply found it when looking at some other SC schools and wasn't convinced on notability. Nothing more, nothing less. While Necrothesp and Sirfurboy and I sometimes see content from a different POV, I think they'd both tell you anything I put forward is in good faith. Star Mississippi 12:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not sure what a school in a Massachusetts suburb has to do with anything- what does that refer to? I found a different Ursuline Academy in Texas, but I think all the sources I mentioned were for South Carolina. Have I mixed any up? As to good faith - definitely no concerns on that score. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 13:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
It should be obvious that a Catholic high school dating back to 1858 in the American South, where Catholics were rare and were sometimes lynched, isn't going to be like a run-of-the-mill high school founded in 1958 in a suburb of Boston.Maybe something lost in translation on my end. Anyway, thanks for your research and note @ Sirfurboy. Withdrawing on the grounds that sufficient sourcing exists to indicate there is more not as easily accessible but 99.99% confirmed to exist. Star Mississippi 02:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗ plicit 00:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Articles about a film and its director, not
properly sourced as having strong claims to passing
WP:NFILM. The attempted notability claim is that it was one of the first films (according to the film article) and/or the very first film (according to the BLP) to feature a lead actor with Down syndrome, but this isn't properly sourced, and isn't "inherently" notable without sourcing -- but the film article otherwise stacks a bunch of student film awards that do not receive media coverage for the purposes of being able to make their winners notable for winning them, while the BLP doesn't actually make any other notability claims at all besides the existence of this film. Meanwhile, the film's article is "referenced" entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability at all, while the BLP is entirely unsourced -- and there are
conflict of interest issues, as the director has edited the film's article in the past and was the creator of his own BLP in defiance of
WP:AUTOBIO.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt either the film or the director from having to pass
WP:GNG on their sourcing.
Bearcat (
talk) 00:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is against this article remaining. @ BD2412: if you want to work on this in draft space (nor or down the road) feel free to ping me for it. No need to go through REFUND. I just don't want this to die a G13 if no one is able now. Star Mississippi 00:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This "list of unicorns in modern popular culture, chiefly literature, film and television" is an
INDISCRIMINATE collection of
TRIVIA which doesn't meet standalone list notability standards. The article lacks citations, and contains no indication this list topic has ever been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources
as required per
NLIST.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC) See also
MOS:TRIVIA and
WP:POPCULTURE.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 17:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just giving this discussion a bit more time. But I have no idea what "wp:not redirects" refers to as it doesn't correspond to a policy page/section, at least none I could find.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Antenna TV affiliates#West Virginia. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 00:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unref BLP. When looking for sources, I couldn't find sufficient to indicate he is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 21:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to EBSA European Under-18 Snooker Championship. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. All refs are affiliated. Under 18 sporting events are rarely notable and this one fails WP:GNG searches revealed next to nothing. Velella Velella Talk 22:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Closing as keep, as no one has challenged (5 days) the sources used to improve the article. This moves consensus to keep per strength of arguments. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable salad that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. BaduFerreira ( talk) 23:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Zero notability whatsoever InDimensional ( talk) 22:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ju-jitsu at the 2001 World Games – Men's fighting −77 kg. as an ATD. Personally, I won't do IAR AFD closures. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (sports) LouisOrr27 ( talk) 21:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Geschichte ( talk) 09:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Lacking secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Current sources are the FCC, radio-locator.com, and Broadcasting Yearbook. These do not demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (Sources should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability) AusLondonder ( talk) 19:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to get more feedback on additions to this article since the nomination. I don't see more support for Deletion here so it looks like the realistic options are Keep or Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced, lack of notability, was unable to find any reliable sources discussing this game. Article has been tagged for notability concerns since 2013. Waxworker ( talk) 00:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)