91.125.234.72 ( talk) 19:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)sorry that i deleted someone else's narrative the other day. did not understand the edit. my computer seems to put my response in the wrong box, or more truthfully i do.== Your Messages == How do I leave the AfD template in place.
Here you go... Okay, see if placed the statement/links at the bottom of this one correctly: http://www.spasnstuff.com/hot-tub-faq/hot-tub-history/anthology-of-the-hot-tub-a-brief-history-of-the-spa.html Please note the following is the source for both History of Water Filters and History of Spa Filters, so we only have the declarative statement once...Is that OK?): http://www.spasnstuff.com/hot-tub-faq/history-of-water-filters/history-of-water-filters.html
I am indeed the author of all three articles and was sharing the content - the release statement seems fine, but do I place it at the end of the article on the Spasnstuff.com site? Then when done - do you restore the articles - or do I place them again? just checking... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwricker ( talk • contribs) 06:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barr1331 ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you I am doing this as a College assignment and it is due Tuesday for my professor to see and I am playing around to figure out wiki. And trying to find the best information on the topic.
Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barr1331 ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I've responded on the talk page. If you could provide a comment on why the article shouldn't be moved, I'd appreciate it. The fact is that "God Bless the Ring" is a part of the games title. Calling the article simply Ehrgeiz gives it an incomplete title, which is why I requested the move. The Prince ( talk) 21:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
"Welcome to St Pancras International. This is a Network Rail owned and managed station with train services provided by First Capital Connect."
Hi there. I noticed you contributed to the debate and survey on the proposed move to St Pancras International. I saw the above static message on the platform monitor screens on the Low Level platforms (Thameslink) this very morning. I have taken a piccy and will upload as "Exhibit O" hopefully within the next 12 hours. best, Sunil060902 ( talk) 10:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Since you were one of the originals that helped keep this article, you might want to look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rolando_Gomez_(2nd_nomination)#Rolando_Gomez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.191.15.133 ( talk) 06:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Tevildo, read the guy's article and you'll see why I put those butts up there (that and the fact that I had nothing better to do than to browse around looking for guys' butts on Commons). ;) Drmies ( talk) 20:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the AfD on this article which I wrote.
I notice someone also put a COI tag on the page. I offered full explanation regarding COI on the Discussion Page of the article, but am unsure of the process for review (and hopefully removal) of the COI tag.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Stu Segal ( talk) 15:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo, With due respect to the deletion decision of the article Death and Adjustment Hypotheses, I want to request you to help me create an article on the book Quest for a New Death, the first book containing the hypotheses. Practically, I am the author of the book and it is really odd and tough for me to create a neutral article on it. But if it is worth it, I want that article to be created. Even I can supply you with the report from the Death Studies journal. Please try to help me. I will be glad if you reply me on my e-mail mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com . Shoovrow ( talk) 14:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo, I am waiting for your further response. Shoovrow ( talk) 14:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 14:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, Prince of Cats, for asking this question at WP:RD/C in the first place; I'd always wondered but not gotten around to asking it. Nyttend ( talk) 04:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
apologies for deleting the narrative of someone else when editing. I am having trouble navigating the site. however find users information invaluable. apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.234.72 ( talk) 19:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Prout patet per recordum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prout patet per recordum. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Powers T 13:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I did nnot intend to re list an old deletio page, but start a new one. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. User:Steguru? Remember to log in so that you can pick up your talk page messages. :) Tevildo ( talk) 17:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Please reput your support. We could use it in the United States Discussion.Red Wiki 03:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red ( talk • contribs)
While that may be true, there are plenty of flaws in both of the editors that I doubt any administrator would consider good. You may have been around a long time, but I promise you, change is possible, even by the smallest margin. I've been put down quite a lot, and I think a lot like you do due to these experiences, but this discussion has a chance. When I first started this, I did it more as a joke, didn't think that it would last long, maybe a day or two. But look at it now!Red Wiki 01:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red ( talk • contribs)
Many thanks for your work in correcting all the instances of the incorrect name. Bruern Crossing ( talk) 18:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Students for Economic Justice. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
In case you're interested, I have started a proposal to have Mihkaw napew banned from responding to comments on the Language reference desk. The relevant thread is WT:RD#This is not working. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 13:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
I wasted five minutes in reverting it. 89.242.102.148 ( talk) 15:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, remember my old guide for Life & Death II: The Brain? I've picked the game back up since I can run it well on DosBox now, and I'm still trying to do a proper aneurysm procedure. Now I can get it to where I can go through the whole procedure from beginning to end -- properly, as far as I can tell -- but each time, it tells me I didn't clamp off the aneurysm even though I did and paid extra attention to doing it the second time around. Did the game ever do this to you? Drop me a note on my talk page or e-mail... - furrykef ( Talk at me) 01:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
You once were involved into an article naming discussion of Chihuahua (state). There is now a new move request you might be interested in: Talk:Chihuahua#Requested move - Chihuahua (state) TopoChecker ( talk) 00:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
My apologies that this covers an edit from several months ago -- to regulate my watchlist I keep a number of articles on an 'off watch list', and check these weekly. I got rather behind with one of the lists...
OK, in this edit to the BR Class 04 article you added a hatnote pointing to the "Brush Type 4". I don't understand the reasoning for your addition. The terms 'class' and 'type' would never normally be interchanged in these contexts. For diesels, 'Class' always refers to the TOPS class, while Type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 refer to groups of loco types arranged by power output. The Brush Type 4 is Class 47 and is never going to be mistaken for a Class 04 shunter... Could you explain please?
EdJogg ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I note that this draft page has been dormant for over a year. Please blank or delete it until you are ready to post the RFCU. Will Beback talk 23:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Since you took part in this before, you might like to know that there is a revived proposal under discussion at Talk:St Pancras railway station#Requested move. -- Alarics ( talk) 20:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Block message:
{{blocked proxy}} <!-- 87.117.139.78:8080 -->
ww2censor ( talk) 22:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Many, many thanks for all your work on this. The redoubtable Mrs Specer will be rescued from obscurity! As regards the New Forest ponies, I always have a tinge of nostalgia for the Epping Forest cattle who used to freely roam the streets of Leytonstone and Wanstead before the advent of BSE in the 1980s. Long may the ponies safely graze. Alansplodge ( talk) 17:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welwyn Tunnel rail crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
and your picking up my obviously off-play and drifting-away second question : among french sexologists, an intercourse is said (or rather was said some 50 years ago...) to be "eupareunique" ("nice union" in greek) when physically and psy.lly satisfactory for both partners. As for "thanatophily" , I suddenly wondered if it is correct in english after having used it in the french meaning, as "cultural tendency to love (or not to be afraid of) death, as Mexicans and Japoneses are said to be" ; in french, having sex with corpses is called "necrophilie" . T.y. , have a nice summer (& beware sun-burns, as must the boy in front of the wall, in the middle of the B.n'W. photo supra ;-) ) . T.y. Arapaima ( talk) 16:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
If you hat Silieini, I'll support it. μηδείς ( talk) 21:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I have some questions for you regarding leg crossing: 1.) No offense for asking, but are you male or female? 2.) How do you cross your legs (in what way/style)? 3.) What does it feel like?
Thanks! ;) SuperHero2111 ( talk) 04:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for this and this. My genuine edit was getting blocked by an automated filter for reasons unknown, so I wanted to test whether all edits were blocked and then forgot to delete the test edit that worked. 86.160.216.217 ( talk) 01:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Please explain why you have hatted my comment at the "Converting motor to generator" thread on the reference desk. [1] The hatnote certainly makes no sense at all unless it is you that is the banned editor (which does not seem likely) and your edit summary makes no sense either, there is no user:WickWack and the IP did not self-identify. Spinning Spark 15:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear, I rewrote a deleted article. Please help me improve it. I have informed those those who deleted it in the past. I shall be very grateful if someone experienced pen through it and help it improvise in any way. the article is Death and adjustment hypotheses. I shall wait for your kind touch. Bolton007 ( talk) 04:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
There are various drive-bys reverting something you posted on the science ref desk. This, for example. Do you want this text kept, or are you OK with that IP deleting it? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
As I gear up for my city's annual Labor Day parade, let me thank you for the blunt mention of class traitors in that discussion. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC) (President, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 91)
Thanks for the answer on the science help desk :) Retartist ( talk) 00:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
THANK. ALREADY TRY IT.EVEN TKE OUT MOBO FROM THE CASE ALSO DISCONNECT ALL CONNECTION AECEPT PSU CORD.PROBLEM STILL PERSIST. 219.94.83.162 ( talk) 03:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a test. 195.89.37.174 ( talk) 16:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, — DerHexer (Talk) 23:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Instead of leaving a trail of things like "Deleted question from banned user", just revert the edit and note in the edit summary that it's a banned user. The fewer remnants of these miscreants we have on Wikipedia, the better. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I opened an AfD, maybe you'd like to chip in. Thanks. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 08:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for replying here but someone had the idea to increase the protection level of the page so I can’t reply back.
Basically I’m just interested if I’m exempted from filing a W8_BEN. I’m afraid no french attorney will know about that. 2A02:8420:508D:CC00:56E6:FCFF:FEDB:2BBA ( talk) 16:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I must have missed something [2]. Is "WickWack" yet another refdesk sock troll? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I suggest you look at users' edit histories and consider recent edits and blocks at the ref desk before you greenlight questions about "civilised congolese". Search my user page for "negress" and "congo" as well, and draw what conclusions you like. μηδείς ( talk) 02:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
i was asking a perfectly legit question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerald williams jr. ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey there.
'[Surrounding your four tildes inside markup deemed improper] is likely to get you banned from the Reference Desks if you persist in it'. I know. That's life: you share information and reply to questions, then forces majeures interfere and you have to stop. What's funny is that Wiki prides itself on enabling anonymous editing. Neat username. See you. ~~~~
Hi!Thanks for the answer at refdesk about percent change.-- 85.121.32.1 ( talk) 11:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi.
The deletion is not a big deal. But who or what is a VoteX? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
It appears to be several of my contributions which have been deleted: I have never used VoteX as a user name, and have no idea why you should choose to remove a string of my contributions. I don't think they were offensive or irrelevant, and would appreciate an explanation. 86.191.126.192 ( talk) 11:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Please don't delete other people's contribution on the refdesk, or accuse them of being a sockpuppet without a shred of evidence. I've restored my contribution. EDIT: I see this user has done this before. Ideologically motivated, it seems. Please stop doing this or you will have to be reported. 86.28.195.109 ( talk) 16:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind words. I do love legal history and the development of the common law, so I welcomed the chance to learn a bit by answering your reference desk question! Happy editing. Neutrality talk 17:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criminal Law Act 1827, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry III. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
You seem to think I may be this previous user. My IP address was changed by my provider on May 25th - they seem to make a habit of this, as this is the third different address I have had this year, with never a warning or explanation for the changes. If it matches one previously used by a banned user, that is a coincidence, and nothing more. 86.191.126.192 ( talk) 14:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC) (previously 86.191.126.192 and 217.44.50.87 and 109.150.174.93)
I'm not really sure a question about military strategy during world war two, based on scholarly works, that has generated no controversy would be any reason to instigate disciplinary measures against me again? -- Andrew 00:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm curious, what did you prefer about the previous set of maps to the new ones? Always looking for ways to improve it (hence why I spent a year redoing it). :) -- Golbez ( talk) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:LED Annotated.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 20:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
You deleted my part of this. [3] But it's OK. :) ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that re WP:RD/C#Windows 10 N LTSB, I've raised the subject of whether what was being asked for was financial advice on the refdesk talk page - wt:Reference Desk#Financial Advice. Thanks, davidprior t/ c 22:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Why did you delete my contribution on the misc ref desk about tall buildings in Europe? There was no reason to. 86.28.195.109 ( talk) 07:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Once again, you reverted an edit by 86.131.187.216, which I can't see as fitting VoteX's disruptive pattern (not that I'm familiar with her). Before you delete refdesk edit based on it coming from an IP once upon a time used by VoteX, could you please perform due diligence, such as seeing where the IP currently geolocates to? Or did you in fact have a reason to suspect that the answers to futurist110's insurance questions did in fact come from the actual VoteX, beyond the mere IP address? Did they fit VoteX's known patterns? As I said, I'm not familiar with her, so if you have reason to think it was her, feel free to say so. 110.140.84.37 ( talk) 15:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, Regarding this [4] removal: is there a reason why you are acting against our published guidelines? They clearly state:
“ | Generally speaking, answers are more likely to be sanctioned than questions. The purpose is to minimise disruption: editors disagree over whether a question is seeking medical advice, and removing the whole question is discouraging for new contributors. Therefore, most of the time, the responsibility lies with responders not to give medical advice, regardless of the question. | ” |
[5] emphasis mine.
Is this you being WP:BOLD and applying WP:NORULES? I'm curious, because I have repeatedly pointed out on the talk page that we are encouraged to remove responses that give medical advice, rather than censor questions. I was tempted to revert your removal, but decided to ask about it instead. In my opinion there are many scholary references we could point the OP to, without giving any sort of medical advice, even broadly construed. I think ToE and User:Wnt's responses were perfectly professional and well within our scope. If you feel this needs more input, feel free to copy over to the talk page. Cheers, SemanticMantis ( talk) 16:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Who is VoteX?? Georgia guy ( talk) 23:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Since you seem to deal with this most often, just wanted to check I was right [6]. Nil Einne ( talk) 01:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of The Doctor and Student at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Doctor and Student, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that The Doctor and Student by Christopher St. Germain was used as a primer by English law students for over two centuries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Doctor and Student. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Computing Desk. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Computing Desk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 19:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, I am a bit confused about the CASEL redirect. I do not think it makes sense to redirect an abbreviation for an institute (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, American education institute) to an article about a general concept. There might also in the future be an article for the CASEL institute. Sda030 ( talk) 21:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, hope you're having a great day. I was the person who put the hatnote (back) into the Uriah Heep article. I was aware of the WP:NAMB guideline when I made the edit, but I think this is a case where it would make sense to ignore the guideline. At least in my location, a Google search for Uriah Heep returns only the band (both wiki results and otherwise) - even several pages of results in. This (a) makes it more difficult for people looking for information on the Dickens character to find the Wikipedia article (a lot of people find Wikipedia articles through google searches, not the main page) and (b) leaves a sizable number of people uninformed about the non-musical usage of the term. This might be a case where following Wikipedia legalese to the letter is at odds with informing the public. I figured a hatnote was the simplest solution short of converting the Uriah Heep article into a disambiguation page. I don't believe strongly enough in the issue to edit-war over it, though, and won't revert it if you disagree. -- Tserton ( talk) 16:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Tevildo. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC) |
Okay, I have given the “more detailed analysis” you requested. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 09:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Tevildo!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk) 15:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Thanks for updating that dab page. I’m currently in the process of adding entries, adding redirects, making sure there aren’t any duplicate dab pages (there’s been a few “x class” and “Class x” dab pages with the exact same content), and adding WikiProjects where necessary for every single class article between 1 and 99. It will take a while even with automated tools like AWB. Fork99 ( talk) 13:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Tevildo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curtiss R-1454, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Jenny N.E. Dotz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § Jenny N.E. Dotz until a consensus is reached. SilverLocust 💬 20:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaoru Ikeya (director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.91.125.234.72 ( talk) 19:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)sorry that i deleted someone else's narrative the other day. did not understand the edit. my computer seems to put my response in the wrong box, or more truthfully i do.== Your Messages == How do I leave the AfD template in place.
Here you go... Okay, see if placed the statement/links at the bottom of this one correctly: http://www.spasnstuff.com/hot-tub-faq/hot-tub-history/anthology-of-the-hot-tub-a-brief-history-of-the-spa.html Please note the following is the source for both History of Water Filters and History of Spa Filters, so we only have the declarative statement once...Is that OK?): http://www.spasnstuff.com/hot-tub-faq/history-of-water-filters/history-of-water-filters.html
I am indeed the author of all three articles and was sharing the content - the release statement seems fine, but do I place it at the end of the article on the Spasnstuff.com site? Then when done - do you restore the articles - or do I place them again? just checking... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwricker ( talk • contribs) 06:00, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barr1331 ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you I am doing this as a College assignment and it is due Tuesday for my professor to see and I am playing around to figure out wiki. And trying to find the best information on the topic.
Thanks again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Barr1331 ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
I've responded on the talk page. If you could provide a comment on why the article shouldn't be moved, I'd appreciate it. The fact is that "God Bless the Ring" is a part of the games title. Calling the article simply Ehrgeiz gives it an incomplete title, which is why I requested the move. The Prince ( talk) 21:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
"Welcome to St Pancras International. This is a Network Rail owned and managed station with train services provided by First Capital Connect."
Hi there. I noticed you contributed to the debate and survey on the proposed move to St Pancras International. I saw the above static message on the platform monitor screens on the Low Level platforms (Thameslink) this very morning. I have taken a piccy and will upload as "Exhibit O" hopefully within the next 12 hours. best, Sunil060902 ( talk) 10:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Since you were one of the originals that helped keep this article, you might want to look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rolando_Gomez_(2nd_nomination)#Rolando_Gomez —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.191.15.133 ( talk) 06:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Tevildo, read the guy's article and you'll see why I put those butts up there (that and the fact that I had nothing better to do than to browse around looking for guys' butts on Commons). ;) Drmies ( talk) 20:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the AfD on this article which I wrote.
I notice someone also put a COI tag on the page. I offered full explanation regarding COI on the Discussion Page of the article, but am unsure of the process for review (and hopefully removal) of the COI tag.
Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Stu Segal ( talk) 15:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo, With due respect to the deletion decision of the article Death and Adjustment Hypotheses, I want to request you to help me create an article on the book Quest for a New Death, the first book containing the hypotheses. Practically, I am the author of the book and it is really odd and tough for me to create a neutral article on it. But if it is worth it, I want that article to be created. Even I can supply you with the report from the Death Studies journal. Please try to help me. I will be glad if you reply me on my e-mail mohammadsamirhossain@yahoo.com . Shoovrow ( talk) 14:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo, I am waiting for your further response. Shoovrow ( talk) 14:04, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 14:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, Prince of Cats, for asking this question at WP:RD/C in the first place; I'd always wondered but not gotten around to asking it. Nyttend ( talk) 04:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
apologies for deleting the narrative of someone else when editing. I am having trouble navigating the site. however find users information invaluable. apologies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.234.72 ( talk) 19:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Prout patet per recordum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prout patet per recordum. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Powers T 13:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I did nnot intend to re list an old deletio page, but start a new one. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. User:Steguru? Remember to log in so that you can pick up your talk page messages. :) Tevildo ( talk) 17:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Please reput your support. We could use it in the United States Discussion.Red Wiki 03:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red ( talk • contribs)
While that may be true, there are plenty of flaws in both of the editors that I doubt any administrator would consider good. You may have been around a long time, but I promise you, change is possible, even by the smallest margin. I've been put down quite a lot, and I think a lot like you do due to these experiences, but this discussion has a chance. When I first started this, I did it more as a joke, didn't think that it would last long, maybe a day or two. But look at it now!Red Wiki 01:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red ( talk • contribs)
Many thanks for your work in correcting all the instances of the incorrect name. Bruern Crossing ( talk) 18:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Students for Economic Justice. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.
In case you're interested, I have started a proposal to have Mihkaw napew banned from responding to comments on the Language reference desk. The relevant thread is WT:RD#This is not working. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 13:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
I wasted five minutes in reverting it. 89.242.102.148 ( talk) 15:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey, remember my old guide for Life & Death II: The Brain? I've picked the game back up since I can run it well on DosBox now, and I'm still trying to do a proper aneurysm procedure. Now I can get it to where I can go through the whole procedure from beginning to end -- properly, as far as I can tell -- but each time, it tells me I didn't clamp off the aneurysm even though I did and paid extra attention to doing it the second time around. Did the game ever do this to you? Drop me a note on my talk page or e-mail... - furrykef ( Talk at me) 01:54, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
You once were involved into an article naming discussion of Chihuahua (state). There is now a new move request you might be interested in: Talk:Chihuahua#Requested move - Chihuahua (state) TopoChecker ( talk) 00:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
My apologies that this covers an edit from several months ago -- to regulate my watchlist I keep a number of articles on an 'off watch list', and check these weekly. I got rather behind with one of the lists...
OK, in this edit to the BR Class 04 article you added a hatnote pointing to the "Brush Type 4". I don't understand the reasoning for your addition. The terms 'class' and 'type' would never normally be interchanged in these contexts. For diesels, 'Class' always refers to the TOPS class, while Type 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 refer to groups of loco types arranged by power output. The Brush Type 4 is Class 47 and is never going to be mistaken for a Class 04 shunter... Could you explain please?
EdJogg ( talk) 13:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I note that this draft page has been dormant for over a year. Please blank or delete it until you are ready to post the RFCU. Will Beback talk 23:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Since you took part in this before, you might like to know that there is a revived proposal under discussion at Talk:St Pancras railway station#Requested move. -- Alarics ( talk) 20:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Block message:
{{blocked proxy}} <!-- 87.117.139.78:8080 -->
ww2censor ( talk) 22:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Many, many thanks for all your work on this. The redoubtable Mrs Specer will be rescued from obscurity! As regards the New Forest ponies, I always have a tinge of nostalgia for the Epping Forest cattle who used to freely roam the streets of Leytonstone and Wanstead before the advent of BSE in the 1980s. Long may the ponies safely graze. Alansplodge ( talk) 17:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welwyn Tunnel rail crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
and your picking up my obviously off-play and drifting-away second question : among french sexologists, an intercourse is said (or rather was said some 50 years ago...) to be "eupareunique" ("nice union" in greek) when physically and psy.lly satisfactory for both partners. As for "thanatophily" , I suddenly wondered if it is correct in english after having used it in the french meaning, as "cultural tendency to love (or not to be afraid of) death, as Mexicans and Japoneses are said to be" ; in french, having sex with corpses is called "necrophilie" . T.y. , have a nice summer (& beware sun-burns, as must the boy in front of the wall, in the middle of the B.n'W. photo supra ;-) ) . T.y. Arapaima ( talk) 16:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
If you hat Silieini, I'll support it. μηδείς ( talk) 21:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I have some questions for you regarding leg crossing: 1.) No offense for asking, but are you male or female? 2.) How do you cross your legs (in what way/style)? 3.) What does it feel like?
Thanks! ;) SuperHero2111 ( talk) 04:36, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for this and this. My genuine edit was getting blocked by an automated filter for reasons unknown, so I wanted to test whether all edits were blocked and then forgot to delete the test edit that worked. 86.160.216.217 ( talk) 01:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Please explain why you have hatted my comment at the "Converting motor to generator" thread on the reference desk. [1] The hatnote certainly makes no sense at all unless it is you that is the banned editor (which does not seem likely) and your edit summary makes no sense either, there is no user:WickWack and the IP did not self-identify. Spinning Spark 15:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear, I rewrote a deleted article. Please help me improve it. I have informed those those who deleted it in the past. I shall be very grateful if someone experienced pen through it and help it improvise in any way. the article is Death and adjustment hypotheses. I shall wait for your kind touch. Bolton007 ( talk) 04:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
There are various drive-bys reverting something you posted on the science ref desk. This, for example. Do you want this text kept, or are you OK with that IP deleting it? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:04, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
As I gear up for my city's annual Labor Day parade, let me thank you for the blunt mention of class traitors in that discussion. -- Orange Mike | Talk 20:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC) (President, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 91)
Thanks for the answer on the science help desk :) Retartist ( talk) 00:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC) |
THANK. ALREADY TRY IT.EVEN TKE OUT MOBO FROM THE CASE ALSO DISCONNECT ALL CONNECTION AECEPT PSU CORD.PROBLEM STILL PERSIST. 219.94.83.162 ( talk) 03:54, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
This is a test. 195.89.37.174 ( talk) 16:11, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, — DerHexer (Talk) 23:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Instead of leaving a trail of things like "Deleted question from banned user", just revert the edit and note in the edit summary that it's a banned user. The fewer remnants of these miscreants we have on Wikipedia, the better. The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I opened an AfD, maybe you'd like to chip in. Thanks. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 08:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for replying here but someone had the idea to increase the protection level of the page so I can’t reply back.
Basically I’m just interested if I’m exempted from filing a W8_BEN. I’m afraid no french attorney will know about that. 2A02:8420:508D:CC00:56E6:FCFF:FEDB:2BBA ( talk) 16:26, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I must have missed something [2]. Is "WickWack" yet another refdesk sock troll? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
I suggest you look at users' edit histories and consider recent edits and blocks at the ref desk before you greenlight questions about "civilised congolese". Search my user page for "negress" and "congo" as well, and draw what conclusions you like. μηδείς ( talk) 02:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
i was asking a perfectly legit question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerald williams jr. ( talk • contribs) 22:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hey there.
'[Surrounding your four tildes inside markup deemed improper] is likely to get you banned from the Reference Desks if you persist in it'. I know. That's life: you share information and reply to questions, then forces majeures interfere and you have to stop. What's funny is that Wiki prides itself on enabling anonymous editing. Neat username. See you. ~~~~
Hi!Thanks for the answer at refdesk about percent change.-- 85.121.32.1 ( talk) 11:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi.
The deletion is not a big deal. But who or what is a VoteX? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:17, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
It appears to be several of my contributions which have been deleted: I have never used VoteX as a user name, and have no idea why you should choose to remove a string of my contributions. I don't think they were offensive or irrelevant, and would appreciate an explanation. 86.191.126.192 ( talk) 11:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Please don't delete other people's contribution on the refdesk, or accuse them of being a sockpuppet without a shred of evidence. I've restored my contribution. EDIT: I see this user has done this before. Ideologically motivated, it seems. Please stop doing this or you will have to be reported. 86.28.195.109 ( talk) 16:55, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind words. I do love legal history and the development of the common law, so I welcomed the chance to learn a bit by answering your reference desk question! Happy editing. Neutrality talk 17:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Criminal Law Act 1827, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry III. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
You seem to think I may be this previous user. My IP address was changed by my provider on May 25th - they seem to make a habit of this, as this is the third different address I have had this year, with never a warning or explanation for the changes. If it matches one previously used by a banned user, that is a coincidence, and nothing more. 86.191.126.192 ( talk) 14:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC) (previously 86.191.126.192 and 217.44.50.87 and 109.150.174.93)
I'm not really sure a question about military strategy during world war two, based on scholarly works, that has generated no controversy would be any reason to instigate disciplinary measures against me again? -- Andrew 00:44, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
I'm curious, what did you prefer about the previous set of maps to the new ones? Always looking for ways to improve it (hence why I spent a year redoing it). :) -- Golbez ( talk) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:LED Annotated.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 20:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
You deleted my part of this. [3] But it's OK. :) ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:04, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know that re WP:RD/C#Windows 10 N LTSB, I've raised the subject of whether what was being asked for was financial advice on the refdesk talk page - wt:Reference Desk#Financial Advice. Thanks, davidprior t/ c 22:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Why did you delete my contribution on the misc ref desk about tall buildings in Europe? There was no reason to. 86.28.195.109 ( talk) 07:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Once again, you reverted an edit by 86.131.187.216, which I can't see as fitting VoteX's disruptive pattern (not that I'm familiar with her). Before you delete refdesk edit based on it coming from an IP once upon a time used by VoteX, could you please perform due diligence, such as seeing where the IP currently geolocates to? Or did you in fact have a reason to suspect that the answers to futurist110's insurance questions did in fact come from the actual VoteX, beyond the mere IP address? Did they fit VoteX's known patterns? As I said, I'm not familiar with her, so if you have reason to think it was her, feel free to say so. 110.140.84.37 ( talk) 15:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, Regarding this [4] removal: is there a reason why you are acting against our published guidelines? They clearly state:
“ | Generally speaking, answers are more likely to be sanctioned than questions. The purpose is to minimise disruption: editors disagree over whether a question is seeking medical advice, and removing the whole question is discouraging for new contributors. Therefore, most of the time, the responsibility lies with responders not to give medical advice, regardless of the question. | ” |
[5] emphasis mine.
Is this you being WP:BOLD and applying WP:NORULES? I'm curious, because I have repeatedly pointed out on the talk page that we are encouraged to remove responses that give medical advice, rather than censor questions. I was tempted to revert your removal, but decided to ask about it instead. In my opinion there are many scholary references we could point the OP to, without giving any sort of medical advice, even broadly construed. I think ToE and User:Wnt's responses were perfectly professional and well within our scope. If you feel this needs more input, feel free to copy over to the talk page. Cheers, SemanticMantis ( talk) 16:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Who is VoteX?? Georgia guy ( talk) 23:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Since you seem to deal with this most often, just wanted to check I was right [6]. Nil Einne ( talk) 01:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tevildo,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of The Doctor and Student at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Doctor and Student, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that The Doctor and Student by Christopher St. Germain was used as a primer by English law students for over two centuries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Doctor and Student. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 12:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Computing Desk. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 8#Computing Desk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 19:05, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, I am a bit confused about the CASEL redirect. I do not think it makes sense to redirect an abbreviation for an institute (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning, American education institute) to an article about a general concept. There might also in the future be an article for the CASEL institute. Sda030 ( talk) 21:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Tevildo, hope you're having a great day. I was the person who put the hatnote (back) into the Uriah Heep article. I was aware of the WP:NAMB guideline when I made the edit, but I think this is a case where it would make sense to ignore the guideline. At least in my location, a Google search for Uriah Heep returns only the band (both wiki results and otherwise) - even several pages of results in. This (a) makes it more difficult for people looking for information on the Dickens character to find the Wikipedia article (a lot of people find Wikipedia articles through google searches, not the main page) and (b) leaves a sizable number of people uninformed about the non-musical usage of the term. This might be a case where following Wikipedia legalese to the letter is at odds with informing the public. I figured a hatnote was the simplest solution short of converting the Uriah Heep article into a disambiguation page. I don't believe strongly enough in the issue to edit-war over it, though, and won't revert it if you disagree. -- Tserton ( talk) 16:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Tevildo. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC) |
Okay, I have given the “more detailed analysis” you requested. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 09:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Tevildo!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Mattdaviesfsic (
talk) 15:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
Thanks for updating that dab page. I’m currently in the process of adding entries, adding redirects, making sure there aren’t any duplicate dab pages (there’s been a few “x class” and “Class x” dab pages with the exact same content), and adding WikiProjects where necessary for every single class article between 1 and 99. It will take a while even with automated tools like AWB. Fork99 ( talk) 13:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Tevildo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curtiss R-1454, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Jenny N.E. Dotz has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 11 § Jenny N.E. Dotz until a consensus is reached. SilverLocust 💬 20:55, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaoru Ikeya (director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.