| Welcome to my
talk page.
Click here to leave me a message.
If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist. |
 | Jtrrs0 uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken. |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
 | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him! |
 Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Hello, you told me that my edits made to the Markos Botsaris page have been reverted, due to them not being constructive. I am sure that you must be talking about the fact that I labeled him as an Arbanite, and changed his name to the Albanian way (Marko Boçari). You call my edits unconstructive, but you and many other editors make his page so that he may seem like he was a Greek, but when you look st what he was, it says that he was a Suliote. The first sentence when I opened that page was: "The Souliotes were an Orthodox Christian Albanian tribal community in the area of Souli in Epirus from the 16th century to the beginning of the 19th century, who via their participation in the Greek War of Independence came to identify with the Greek nation.". He was a Suliote, and Suliotes were an Albanian tribal community. Now this is enough evidence that you have made a mistake reverting my edits on the page of Markos Botsaris, I hope you will anwser. Andi Atdhetari ( talk) 14:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. First of all, I have no interest or desire in making it seem that he was a Greek or anything else. Frankly, I don’t care one way or the other. Please don’t assume that other editors are being malicious.
- I have reviewed the edits I reverted and read the article’s Talk page and I am convinced I did the right thing in reverting your edits. You should not make changes that are contrary to the consensus in the Talk Page of an article. In my view, the consensus is that the current version of his name is correct. If you really think this is wrong I’d encourage you to try and convince other editors of your point of view with good, reliable sources. Jtrrs0 ( talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello.
Whilst I somehwat agree I did not phase it in the nicest way possible my point still stands so may I re add it nicer. Regent001 ( talk) 13:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. If you do please make sure your comments adhere to the policy on being neutral and that they don’t constitute Vandalism Jtrrs0 ( talk) 14:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Jtrrs0, I hope you are doing well. I'm not particularly experienced with rfc closures, that's why I'm reaching out to you. If I'm not mistaken, an editor who opens an rfc is normally capable of closing it as well. As we discussed at the talkpage, an rfc closure might be the best solution at the moment considering that no major dispute arose prior to it, and this discussion could (re-)open old or newer disputes. Piccco ( talk) 00:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks. I hope you're doing well too. I am also not very experienced on closures but I agree that the RfC is premature. I will leave it be for today and close it tonight/tomorrow if the consensus still seems to be for a close with no action. Thanks and apologies for the mistake on my part! Jtrrs0 ( talk) 08:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Israel–Hamas war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Djong (ship) has an RfC
Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin ( talk) 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Estonia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
| Welcome to my
talk page.
Click here to leave me a message.
If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there; I am watching it. If you leave a message here I will usually reply here, so please click the 'watch' tab at the top of your page in order to add my talk page to your watchlist. |
|
| Jtrrs0 uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken. |
|
| This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
|
| Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him! |
Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Hello, you told me that my edits made to the Markos Botsaris page have been reverted, due to them not being constructive. I am sure that you must be talking about the fact that I labeled him as an Arbanite, and changed his name to the Albanian way (Marko Boçari). You call my edits unconstructive, but you and many other editors make his page so that he may seem like he was a Greek, but when you look st what he was, it says that he was a Suliote. The first sentence when I opened that page was: "The Souliotes were an Orthodox Christian Albanian tribal community in the area of Souli in Epirus from the 16th century to the beginning of the 19th century, who via their participation in the Greek War of Independence came to identify with the Greek nation.". He was a Suliote, and Suliotes were an Albanian tribal community. Now this is enough evidence that you have made a mistake reverting my edits on the page of Markos Botsaris, I hope you will anwser. Andi Atdhetari ( talk) 14:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. First of all, I have no interest or desire in making it seem that he was a Greek or anything else. Frankly, I don’t care one way or the other. Please don’t assume that other editors are being malicious.
- I have reviewed the edits I reverted and read the article’s Talk page and I am convinced I did the right thing in reverting your edits. You should not make changes that are contrary to the consensus in the Talk Page of an article. In my view, the consensus is that the current version of his name is correct. If you really think this is wrong I’d encourage you to try and convince other editors of your point of view with good, reliable sources. Jtrrs0 ( talk) 15:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello.
Whilst I somehwat agree I did not phase it in the nicest way possible my point still stands so may I re add it nicer. Regent001 ( talk) 13:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. If you do please make sure your comments adhere to the policy on being neutral and that they don’t constitute Vandalism Jtrrs0 ( talk) 14:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Jtrrs0, I hope you are doing well. I'm not particularly experienced with rfc closures, that's why I'm reaching out to you. If I'm not mistaken, an editor who opens an rfc is normally capable of closing it as well. As we discussed at the talkpage, an rfc closure might be the best solution at the moment considering that no major dispute arose prior to it, and this discussion could (re-)open old or newer disputes. Piccco ( talk) 00:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks. I hope you're doing well too. I am also not very experienced on closures but I agree that the RfC is premature. I will leave it be for today and close it tonight/tomorrow if the consensus still seems to be for a close with no action. Thanks and apologies for the mistake on my part! Jtrrs0 ( talk) 08:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Israel–Hamas war on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Djong (ship) has an RfC
Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin ( talk) 14:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Estonia on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem