The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013#July – September. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the supplied coverage is from the time of the event in July 2013. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Atari TOS. as an ATD. Another relisting is unlikely to result in more participation so I'm closing this now. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Plenty fo mentions, but mostly asking for support or capsule reviews of OSS projects and therefore not the substantial third-party coverage required to establish notability. The article isn't much more than a release history. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article about non-notable organization, created by obvious paid editor. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 20:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to earlier AFD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC). Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the coverage supplied is from November 2022. No evidence of lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the sources are from May 2017 except one other from June 2017. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 22:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft or User space, contact me or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost no reliable sourcing on the page (mostly just discogs.com). Very little sourcing on this individual appears to be available. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Javier Luis Calmell del Solar. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This topic lacks notability, as there appears to be a nearly complete lack of sources for this party's existence, and no sources for activities, dates, policy, or anything else. Ships&Space ( talk) 20:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
After 7 games in 2 years on the semi-professional level, Magaña-Rivera played 2 games (99 minutes) in the USL League One four years ago. I believe there is not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Sources in the article are exclusively primary, as is this one telling us that he became a high school soccer coach. I found a news story about him signing, which can't be accessed by me in Europe, but either way I don't see being signed as significant enough to warrant an encyclopedic biography. Geschichte ( talk) 20:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the GNG, with relatively light sourcing mostly focusing on The Finest Tree. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Nizigiyimana never played a single match in the USL League One. Short college career. Don't see this having any chance of having any independent significant coverage. There is one personal story on a local radio station, which isn't enough to grant notability through any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte ( talk) 20:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a comedian, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for comedians. As always, comedians are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing
WP:GNG on reliable source media coverage about them -- but this is referenced predominantly to
primary sources that are not support for notability, such as YouTube videos and event calendar listings.
And of the just three footnotes that represent any sort of media coverage, two of them come from university student newspapers, which would be acceptable for use if the other sourcing were better but can't carry passage of GNG all by themselves. Only one hit out of 11 represents a journalist writing about him in a real media outlet of record, and that isn't enough.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lotus Bank. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about the CEO of a bank which doesn't prove notability. It's more of inherent and not a direct entry to Wikipedia. It was proposed for deletion but was deproded for redirect /merge. When it has been redirected, another editor reverted it with reasons whatsoever. It s more to civility and consensus if it's discussed. For now, it down meets GNG, but per WP:ATD, redirect to Lotus Bank SafariScribe ( talk) 19:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Bradelykooper ( talk) 06:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Soccer player with a comprehensible fail of WP:SPORTCRIT. Played 23 minutes for Charleston Battery. He went to college after that, and his college career didn't pan out, only featuring in three games in 2023. I did find two news articles about him signing in the first place, but that is not a significant enough event to warrant an encyclopedic article. Geschichte ( talk) 19:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. No actual rationale provided beyond "this article is outdated", which is not valid and this nomination is disruptive. ( non-admin closure) λ Negative MP1 18:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Welp,looks this this article is outdated. Veyleagggjj ( talk) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Multiple searches only bring up loose references with very, very little WP:SIGCOV. Although there is no doubt this person exists and is an academic, there is very little evidence of notability. Anwegmann ( talk) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Halloween#Food. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. All this article does is demonstrate that cakes can be decorated for different events, which is already covered in cake decorating. BaduFerreira ( talk) 17:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Broken refs on the page that we're likely WP:ROUTINE newspaper coverage. I'm not seeing anything else which would appear to meet the notability criteria for inclusion JMWt ( talk) 15:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing sources which could be offered to show the notability standards are met for inclusion. JMWt ( talk) 15:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No love for deletion in this discussion. Renaming and refactoring are out of scope for the close. BusterD ( talk) 15:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a valid disambiguation page: only one even partial match, plus a bunch of related articles. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 07:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep, the dab has several things a person could plausibly expect to find for a search of "paper folding", most obviously Paper toys. Unhelpful to the reader to delete Mach61 19:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey all, I'd like to delete Talking point per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I don't think it makes sense to merge it into anything because 1. there's not much to merge. It has been a measly one-paragraph stub for the past eight years and before that, it had a few unsourced paragraphs [5] that were correctly deleted and aren't worth salvaging. And reason 2, It's a common term that doesn't need to be defined in an encyclopedia. The phrase "talking point" is used in the text of around 800 Wikipedia articles. [6] but it's only linked-to in the text of about 30 articles (I'm not counting the articles that link to it from Template:Rhetoric). An entry on talking points is totally appropriate for a dictionary (like Wiktionary for example [7] but not an encyclopedia. Thoughts? Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk) 16:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NACTOR. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- notability doesn't reside in listing acting roles, it resides in the quality and depth and volume of media coverage about him and his performances that can be shown to support the article with.
But this is referenced almost entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability, such as theatre roles being sourced to the
self-published websites of the theatre companies that staged them -- and while there is one footnote that appears to actually be a reliable and
WP:GNG-worthy source, one valid piece of media coverage isn't enough all by itself to pass GNG.
There's also a
conflict of interest issue here, as the article has been directly edited by the subject himself under his own name -- and while he didn't create the article himself, he began editing it within a few hours of its creation, suggesting that he likely solicited somebody to write it for him as how else would he already know it was there so quickly?
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be the subject of a lot more than just one piece of media coverage.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The article at this point and when it was moved back to mainspace only served to promote "Dr. Hemant Jaisingh". None of the 12 sources had a hit for "Nerve Therapy". And the articles that mention "Hemant Jaisingh" are websites created to look like reputable news media. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 15:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Former mayor of Cairns Region who does not meet point 2 of WP:NPOL and does not appear to meet WP:GNG. As a local elected official, they are not considered inherently notable and the coverage that I'm finding all appears to be fairly routine. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This India school article has zero references to establish notability. After searching, found no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific school. Article was created on 9 June 2008; a speedy-delete in 2008. JoeNMLC ( talk) 14:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence this film meets
WP:NFILM. The only coverage I can find of this film is listings in film catalogs and promotion for the film. EDIT: To clarify a bit here, there are seven sources in this article. After a search I was able to find one more (Varia), although it is only mentioned once. That gives us 8 candidate sources. Of these, two are promotional (brochure, and De Locomotief). Two are film catalogs (Kristanto 2007, Biran 1979) and so do not establish notability, one is a list of an actor's filmography. This leaves two sources, Vara and Kentaja. The Vara article seems to only mention the film in passing but lets assume generously it passes. The last source is... weird (describing a film released 3 years before as a "new film"?) and frankly I wouldn't trust it, especially since it is unverifiable.
Allan Nonymous (
talk) 14:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. WP:TROUT me for this one, I am apparently hilariously bad at reading cursive. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 15:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a pretty close case here, but having reviewed the sources both here and on Indonesian Wikipedia, I feel there is a case for delete.
WP:GNG is failed as only one of the cited sources (iNews.ID) seems to cover her in depth. With respect to
WP:NACTOR, I can only find her appearing in three films with billing. Two of them are not notable enough to be covered in eng-wiki, and one of them is... weird. (In Supir Istimewa, she is mentioned in the "plot" section as a major role despite not appearing on the billing). This is a pretty close case but I feel it wouldn't hurt to at least open an AfD.
Allan Nonymous (
talk) 14:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Die, irrelevant Indonesian people articles.(see here) is the spirit of these recent numerous nominations of Indonesia-related articles, I agree with you that this is not the way the Afd process should be approached. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a senior-level medal at any international competition, nor has won the U.S. national championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Port Shepstone#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Cites one dead link, fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. In South Africa, the terms "secondary" and "high" school are often used, the reason I'm bringing this up is because I also came across Port Shepstone High School which I would like nominate for deletion for the same reason as this one but I'm not familiar with multiple noms, I also fail to understand how there can be a high school and a secondary school of the same name at the same town/location. dxneo ( talk) 11:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Agnetha Fältskog discography#Compilation albums. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing any RS which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 09:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT - lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Sourcing is poor: government databases and Forex websites, much of that trivial coverage such as personnel changes per WP:ORGTRIV. Overly promotional and unencyclopedic. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of female United States presidential and vice presidential candidates. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have attracted widespread coverage to establish notability beyond the single event of entering in the 1964 Democratic presidential primaries. Suggest redirection to List of female United States presidential and vice presidential candidates. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:BAND. The only secondary coverage I can find of them in reliable sources is the Under The Radar album review already cited here, and this album review in the Jackson Free Press. They were the local warmup band for two notable bands in their home town in 2009, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited. I can find no evidence of national rotation, or significant awards. Created by SPAs and speedy deleted three times 2008-10, but for some reason not the fourth SPA in 2010. Wikishovel ( talk) 18:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[[
and ]]
and link the user name exactly as it is used, including capitalisation, e. g. for me it would be @[[User:Ouro]]
. --
Ouro (
blah blah) 07:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 11:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Subject has indeed been confirmed elected to the Tasmanian Parliament. Canley ( talk) 06:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This individual is not being projected as being elected yet, and the claim that she is "expected to be elected" is unsourced. Article made prematurely. It is entirely possible that Beswick will not be elected – article is speculative and has misinformation. J2m5 ( talk) 10:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM ( talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Source | Analysis | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
#1 | not significant ("Suster also founded LaunchPad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#2 | dead link, not on the wayback machine. | ✗ |
#3 | note that this is a blog hosted by the NYT, not the NYT proper. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#4 | blog on medium dot com. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#5 | forbes contributor, not reliable. | ✗ |
#6 | own website, not independent. | ✗ |
#7 | A real source! But a local one. | ~ |
#8 | the noticeboard doesn't have a clear consensus on pando as a source. Dubious. | ~ |
#9 | techcrunch "may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability". | ✗ |
#10 | another forbes contributor. | ✗ |
#11 | not significant ("went on [...] to become a partner at a tech accelerator, Launchpad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#12 | not independent ("customer stories" section) | ✗ |
#13 | another real but local source. | ~ |
#14 | plausibly real, local. | ~ |
#15 | blog and not independent. | ✗ |
#16 | business insider syndicated content "should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher." this is syndicated from a medium blog. not reliable. | ✗ |
#17 | local and not significant ("I applied to LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#18 | business insider is dubiously reliable, and it's a passing mention anyway ("Incubated at the SoCal tech accelerator Launchpad LA") | ✗ |
#19 | Passing mention ("which was part of incubator Launchpad LA") in a dubiously reliable source. | ✗ |
#20 | Local source again, focused on the company they funded. | ✗ |
#21 | Not actually mentioned in this source. | ✗ |
#22 | passing mention ("came out of the accelerator program LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#23 | Not significant, reliable, or independent (podcast by someone whose company was funded) | ✗ |
Keep . Per the evaluation above sources 7, 13 and 14 are reliable sources. LA Business Journal is a notable publication. Z3r0h3r000 ( talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This will eventually be an unwieldy list of all digital devices (cameras, phones, scales, light bulbs...) Sean Brunnock ( talk) 12:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. I can find no such sources that describe a timeline, as envisaged here, about everything analogue to digital. I can find evidence in specific domains, such as the evolution of music recording, but even there, the information is not generally presented as a standalone timeline without any context. I think this list is misconceived. If we consider the reader, the question is what information might they want or need to know, and how would we best provide that information? An incomplete context free list is not going to help an information need. Instead an article on this wide ranging subject should be written in prose, and may then contain relevant timelines. For instance, would Comparison of analog and digital recording benefit from a timeline? Such a timeline is typically presented as a diagram in sources, rather than as a list. Finally I am unconvinced by the argument above that the page will not become unwieldy simply because no one has edited it. Sure, the lack of interest in touching this page might mean it remains short, but it also means it is very incomplete, and what it contains is editor selected, and thus WP:OR. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was procedural keep. Title is no longer an article, since it was moved by the nom. Should be nominated at RfD instead. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The title is incorrect and does not match the content. The page is moved to Rayavaram (Markapur mandal). Hence the old page should be deleted. Arjunaraoc ( talk) 09:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, sourced to reprints of press releases and partnership announcements. ~ A412 talk! 08:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Alshowkan doesn't seem to meet any of the WP:NACADEMIC criteria, having reached Assistant Professor before leaving for industry. His current post (from the references) is "postdoctoral scholar". His important work seems to have been done as part of a team at Oak Ridge. Considering WP:BIO, there are some prizes ('top 100' listing in an industry magazine), but this doesn't seem sufficiently notable. My searches don't find more to add to the notability argument (including looking at Scopus and Google Scholar listings, which are linked). Klbrain ( talk) 07:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009#July – September. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the supplied sources are from July 2009. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 07:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Problematic smartphone use. I'm not sure that this is the most appropriate Merge/Redirect target but it's the option that seems to carry the most opinions for it. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not notable enough for its own article, considering we have many articles on the broader subject. Worth merging into a section in another article, maybe Problematic smartphone use § Prevalence. Dan • ✉ 13:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This is moreorless a term describing an event that is happening during a certain point in history. there are many notable sources just about describing the details the impact of what is behimd the term. this is lookijg towqrds being a very prevelant thing that prevails in gen alpha kids. in my opinion, keep for now and let the article be expanded from the sources provided. another suggestion i have is to expand if with sources using the term "brainrot", a new word meaning content presumably of poor value and supposedly could hinder development of adolescent minds
right now the article is very bare and it would benefjr greatly from an expanaion, which i believe contributed greatly to the inititiation of the afd discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.179.162.206 ( talk) 14:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
* This could probably be merged to the
Generation Alpha article (if reliable sources are describing Generation Alpha as 'iPad kids' that is). I see that it's already in there at
Generation Alpha#iPad Kids, so delete this standalone article.
Some1 (
talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus to merge, but to what?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 13:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need a merge target
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There was no support for redirecting to any other article. ✗ plicit 01:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Note to closing admin. I ask please that if it comes to the stage where this may be deleted, we could look at the alternative of redirecting it to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create another page such as Channel 25 low-power TV stations in California or similar, thus preserving the history. I've also noticed that KSPK-LD, KBRO-LD and KJCS-LD are up for Deletion Nomination. Could we please look at doing similar for those. Perhaps redirect to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create Low-power TV stations in Colorado. It would be a shame as there was work put into them by others and a redirect and merge is always a good alternative consideration. Thanks Karl Twist ( talk) 12:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A discussion of possible redirect targets would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 10:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Persecution of Ahmadis#2014. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
3 of the sources are actually dated from before this event. The remaining sources are all from the time of event. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:BASIC. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf ( talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. If you want a Keep vote to be taken seriously, bring the reliable sources you found into this discussion so they can be evaluated, don't just do a web search.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, I don't see any consensus here for any particular outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember to sign all comments in a discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 07:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Promotional article from an editor with possible COI. BEFORE does not help. In short, non-notable journalist. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No notable pro wrestling title. A regional title active for a few years. Lack of third party reliable sources focusing on the title besides a few WP:ROUTINE results. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Street dog#India. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Quite obviously fails WP:GNG. Unencyclopedic, essay-like article. Do we really need a Wikipedia article on stray dogs in India? 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 05:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Everything on this page can all fit in Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis so it would simply be best to redirect it and merge. Okmrman ( talk) 04:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable location. Per reference 3 (the only source of information that could be found) this was just a rural station with a nearby school and (for a big fat six years) a post office. These features could commonly be found in remote areas during the 19th century and do not amount to a "community", let alone one that is still recognized as such. No other information could be found and satellite view shows just a railroad track with a single farm nearby: [17]. Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lacey, Washington. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. This place is just a non-notable intersection. It was possibly once known as "Mushroom Corner" for a nearby mushroom farm, but that's an informal designation and does not amount to a "community". Today this is a busy intersection in a residential area of Lacey, WA, not a community in its own right, if it ever was. Furthermore, the article's second section is unsourced and WP:NOTNEWS applies even if it were. This place fails WP:GEOLAND. Thurston County does recognize a Mushroom Corner voting precinct: [18] but otherwise nothing could be found. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. I'm closing this as Delete as I do not care for a Merge tagging from a main space article to a User page. Just my preference. If any editor would like to work with this article, it can be restored to Draft space on request. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Only passing mentions of this place could be found: [20], [21], [22]. All of these indicate this was just a sawmill and never a "community". The existence of a post office is not significant, since in the pre-automobile era factory workers often lived at the facilities where they worked, so a post office would be necessary. And according to an article found by another user ( [23]), the post office was barely a post office. Current satellite view just shows an industrial building surrounded by residential areas. Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Military organization#Commands, formations, and units. There is no real consensus for any outcome but I'm going to use administrative/closer's discretion and close this as a Redirect. Content is in the page history if anyone cares to Merge its content. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced stub, with a request for references since 2011. One broken footnote to a general search. My BEFORE suggests this is a generic term used in various fields, and I can't confirm that there is a specific use of this in military. Our article fails WP:OR, WP:GNG and WP:V. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, nobody wants to keep, so this is probably going to be deleted if nobody can come up with an alternative such as merging or redirecting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
a suitable glossary article. BusterD ( talk) 14:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Soft tennis at the 2022 Asian Games. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Falls very short on the relevant SNG criteria. And that guidance pretty clearly says why it has noot GNG coverage or even is likely to possibly have it. Has only one source with is stats-only by the folks who ran it. North8000 ( talk) 18:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. Stub about a planned future television series that does not exist yet. No sources except ope brief announcement. North8000 ( talk) 18:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of car manufacturers of the United Kingdom#Former manufacturers. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing RS which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 18:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus split between redirect and delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article is thinly sourced and has only been marginally improved since 2011. Unclear to me if the company was ever significant. William Graham talk 01:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable company GraziePrego ( talk) 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2013#July – September. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the supplied coverage is from the time of the event in July 2013. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Atari TOS. as an ATD. Another relisting is unlikely to result in more participation so I'm closing this now. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Plenty fo mentions, but mostly asking for support or capsule reviews of OSS projects and therefore not the substantial third-party coverage required to establish notability. The article isn't much more than a release history. Mikeblas ( talk) 15:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article about non-notable organization, created by obvious paid editor. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 20:56, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to earlier AFD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Inspection Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC). Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the coverage supplied is from November 2022. No evidence of lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 23:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the sources are from May 2017 except one other from June 2017. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 22:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 21:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft or User space, contact me or make a request at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Almost no reliable sourcing on the page (mostly just discogs.com). Very little sourcing on this individual appears to be available. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Javier Luis Calmell del Solar. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This topic lacks notability, as there appears to be a nearly complete lack of sources for this party's existence, and no sources for activities, dates, policy, or anything else. Ships&Space ( talk) 20:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
After 7 games in 2 years on the semi-professional level, Magaña-Rivera played 2 games (99 minutes) in the USL League One four years ago. I believe there is not enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Sources in the article are exclusively primary, as is this one telling us that he became a high school soccer coach. I found a news story about him signing, which can't be accessed by me in Europe, but either way I don't see being signed as significant enough to warrant an encyclopedic biography. Geschichte ( talk) 20:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the GNG, with relatively light sourcing mostly focusing on The Finest Tree. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Nizigiyimana never played a single match in the USL League One. Short college career. Don't see this having any chance of having any independent significant coverage. There is one personal story on a local radio station, which isn't enough to grant notability through any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte ( talk) 20:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a comedian, not
properly sourced as passing notability criteria for comedians. As always, comedians are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing
WP:GNG on reliable source media coverage about them -- but this is referenced predominantly to
primary sources that are not support for notability, such as YouTube videos and event calendar listings.
And of the just three footnotes that represent any sort of media coverage, two of them come from university student newspapers, which would be acceptable for use if the other sourcing were better but can't carry passage of GNG all by themselves. Only one hit out of 11 represents a journalist writing about him in a real media outlet of record, and that isn't enough.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lotus Bank. Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about the CEO of a bank which doesn't prove notability. It's more of inherent and not a direct entry to Wikipedia. It was proposed for deletion but was deproded for redirect /merge. When it has been redirected, another editor reverted it with reasons whatsoever. It s more to civility and consensus if it's discussed. For now, it down meets GNG, but per WP:ATD, redirect to Lotus Bank SafariScribe ( talk) 19:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Bradelykooper ( talk) 06:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Soccer player with a comprehensible fail of WP:SPORTCRIT. Played 23 minutes for Charleston Battery. He went to college after that, and his college career didn't pan out, only featuring in three games in 2023. I did find two news articles about him signing in the first place, but that is not a significant enough event to warrant an encyclopedic article. Geschichte ( talk) 19:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't find sources to show he meets WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 18:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. No actual rationale provided beyond "this article is outdated", which is not valid and this nomination is disruptive. ( non-admin closure) λ Negative MP1 18:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Welp,looks this this article is outdated. Veyleagggjj ( talk) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:ENT / WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 17:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 17:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Multiple searches only bring up loose references with very, very little WP:SIGCOV. Although there is no doubt this person exists and is an academic, there is very little evidence of notability. Anwegmann ( talk) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Halloween#Food. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cake that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. All this article does is demonstrate that cakes can be decorated for different events, which is already covered in cake decorating. BaduFerreira ( talk) 17:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Broken refs on the page that we're likely WP:ROUTINE newspaper coverage. I'm not seeing anything else which would appear to meet the notability criteria for inclusion JMWt ( talk) 15:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing sources which could be offered to show the notability standards are met for inclusion. JMWt ( talk) 15:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. No love for deletion in this discussion. Renaming and refactoring are out of scope for the close. BusterD ( talk) 15:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Not a valid disambiguation page: only one even partial match, plus a bunch of related articles. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:47, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 07:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 17:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep, the dab has several things a person could plausibly expect to find for a search of "paper folding", most obviously Paper toys. Unhelpful to the reader to delete Mach61 19:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey all, I'd like to delete Talking point per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. I don't think it makes sense to merge it into anything because 1. there's not much to merge. It has been a measly one-paragraph stub for the past eight years and before that, it had a few unsourced paragraphs [5] that were correctly deleted and aren't worth salvaging. And reason 2, It's a common term that doesn't need to be defined in an encyclopedia. The phrase "talking point" is used in the text of around 800 Wikipedia articles. [6] but it's only linked-to in the text of about 30 articles (I'm not counting the articles that link to it from Template:Rhetoric). An entry on talking points is totally appropriate for a dictionary (like Wiktionary for example [7] but not an encyclopedia. Thoughts? Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk) 16:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an actor, not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NACTOR. As always, actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- notability doesn't reside in listing acting roles, it resides in the quality and depth and volume of media coverage about him and his performances that can be shown to support the article with.
But this is referenced almost entirely to
primary sources that are not support for notability, such as theatre roles being sourced to the
self-published websites of the theatre companies that staged them -- and while there is one footnote that appears to actually be a reliable and
WP:GNG-worthy source, one valid piece of media coverage isn't enough all by itself to pass GNG.
There's also a
conflict of interest issue here, as the article has been directly edited by the subject himself under his own name -- and while he didn't create the article himself, he began editing it within a few hours of its creation, suggesting that he likely solicited somebody to write it for him as how else would he already know it was there so quickly?
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be the subject of a lot more than just one piece of media coverage.
Bearcat (
talk) 15:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
The article at this point and when it was moved back to mainspace only served to promote "Dr. Hemant Jaisingh". None of the 12 sources had a hit for "Nerve Therapy". And the articles that mention "Hemant Jaisingh" are websites created to look like reputable news media. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 15:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Former mayor of Cairns Region who does not meet point 2 of WP:NPOL and does not appear to meet WP:GNG. As a local elected official, they are not considered inherently notable and the coverage that I'm finding all appears to be fairly routine. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This India school article has zero references to establish notability. After searching, found no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific school. Article was created on 9 June 2008; a speedy-delete in 2008. JoeNMLC ( talk) 14:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence this film meets
WP:NFILM. The only coverage I can find of this film is listings in film catalogs and promotion for the film. EDIT: To clarify a bit here, there are seven sources in this article. After a search I was able to find one more (Varia), although it is only mentioned once. That gives us 8 candidate sources. Of these, two are promotional (brochure, and De Locomotief). Two are film catalogs (Kristanto 2007, Biran 1979) and so do not establish notability, one is a list of an actor's filmography. This leaves two sources, Vara and Kentaja. The Vara article seems to only mention the film in passing but lets assume generously it passes. The last source is... weird (describing a film released 3 years before as a "new film"?) and frankly I wouldn't trust it, especially since it is unverifiable.
Allan Nonymous (
talk) 14:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. WP:TROUT me for this one, I am apparently hilariously bad at reading cursive. ( non-admin closure) Allan Nonymous ( talk) 15:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a pretty close case here, but having reviewed the sources both here and on Indonesian Wikipedia, I feel there is a case for delete.
WP:GNG is failed as only one of the cited sources (iNews.ID) seems to cover her in depth. With respect to
WP:NACTOR, I can only find her appearing in three films with billing. Two of them are not notable enough to be covered in eng-wiki, and one of them is... weird. (In Supir Istimewa, she is mentioned in the "plot" section as a major role despite not appearing on the billing). This is a pretty close case but I feel it wouldn't hurt to at least open an AfD.
Allan Nonymous (
talk) 14:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Die, irrelevant Indonesian people articles.(see here) is the spirit of these recent numerous nominations of Indonesia-related articles, I agree with you that this is not the way the Afd process should be approached. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSKATE; has neither won a senior-level medal at any international competition, nor has won the U.S. national championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:21, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Port Shepstone#Education. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Cites one dead link, fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. In South Africa, the terms "secondary" and "high" school are often used, the reason I'm bringing this up is because I also came across Port Shepstone High School which I would like nominate for deletion for the same reason as this one but I'm not familiar with multiple noms, I also fail to understand how there can be a high school and a secondary school of the same name at the same town/location. dxneo ( talk) 11:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Agnetha Fältskog discography#Compilation albums. Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing any RS which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 09:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT - lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Sourcing is poor: government databases and Forex websites, much of that trivial coverage such as personnel changes per WP:ORGTRIV. Overly promotional and unencyclopedic. AusLondonder ( talk) 13:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of female United States presidential and vice presidential candidates. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to have attracted widespread coverage to establish notability beyond the single event of entering in the 1964 Democratic presidential primaries. Suggest redirection to List of female United States presidential and vice presidential candidates. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:BAND. The only secondary coverage I can find of them in reliable sources is the Under The Radar album review already cited here, and this album review in the Jackson Free Press. They were the local warmup band for two notable bands in their home town in 2009, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited. I can find no evidence of national rotation, or significant awards. Created by SPAs and speedy deleted three times 2008-10, but for some reason not the fourth SPA in 2010. Wikishovel ( talk) 18:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[[
and ]]
and link the user name exactly as it is used, including capitalisation, e. g. for me it would be @[[User:Ouro]]
. --
Ouro (
blah blah) 07:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no! 11:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Subject has indeed been confirmed elected to the Tasmanian Parliament. Canley ( talk) 06:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
This individual is not being projected as being elected yet, and the claim that she is "expected to be elected" is unsourced. Article made prematurely. It is entirely possible that Beswick will not be elected – article is speculative and has misinformation. J2m5 ( talk) 10:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM ( talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Source | Analysis | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
#1 | not significant ("Suster also founded LaunchPad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#2 | dead link, not on the wayback machine. | ✗ |
#3 | note that this is a blog hosted by the NYT, not the NYT proper. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#4 | blog on medium dot com. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#5 | forbes contributor, not reliable. | ✗ |
#6 | own website, not independent. | ✗ |
#7 | A real source! But a local one. | ~ |
#8 | the noticeboard doesn't have a clear consensus on pando as a source. Dubious. | ~ |
#9 | techcrunch "may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability". | ✗ |
#10 | another forbes contributor. | ✗ |
#11 | not significant ("went on [...] to become a partner at a tech accelerator, Launchpad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#12 | not independent ("customer stories" section) | ✗ |
#13 | another real but local source. | ~ |
#14 | plausibly real, local. | ~ |
#15 | blog and not independent. | ✗ |
#16 | business insider syndicated content "should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher." this is syndicated from a medium blog. not reliable. | ✗ |
#17 | local and not significant ("I applied to LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#18 | business insider is dubiously reliable, and it's a passing mention anyway ("Incubated at the SoCal tech accelerator Launchpad LA") | ✗ |
#19 | Passing mention ("which was part of incubator Launchpad LA") in a dubiously reliable source. | ✗ |
#20 | Local source again, focused on the company they funded. | ✗ |
#21 | Not actually mentioned in this source. | ✗ |
#22 | passing mention ("came out of the accelerator program LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#23 | Not significant, reliable, or independent (podcast by someone whose company was funded) | ✗ |
Keep . Per the evaluation above sources 7, 13 and 14 are reliable sources. LA Business Journal is a notable publication. Z3r0h3r000 ( talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This will eventually be an unwieldy list of all digital devices (cameras, phones, scales, light bulbs...) Sean Brunnock ( talk) 12:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Notability guidelines also apply to the creation of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. I can find no such sources that describe a timeline, as envisaged here, about everything analogue to digital. I can find evidence in specific domains, such as the evolution of music recording, but even there, the information is not generally presented as a standalone timeline without any context. I think this list is misconceived. If we consider the reader, the question is what information might they want or need to know, and how would we best provide that information? An incomplete context free list is not going to help an information need. Instead an article on this wide ranging subject should be written in prose, and may then contain relevant timelines. For instance, would Comparison of analog and digital recording benefit from a timeline? Such a timeline is typically presented as a diagram in sources, rather than as a list. Finally I am unconvinced by the argument above that the page will not become unwieldy simply because no one has edited it. Sure, the lack of interest in touching this page might mean it remains short, but it also means it is very incomplete, and what it contains is editor selected, and thus WP:OR. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 08:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was procedural keep. Title is no longer an article, since it was moved by the nom. Should be nominated at RfD instead. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The title is incorrect and does not match the content. The page is moved to Rayavaram (Markapur mandal). Hence the old page should be deleted. Arjunaraoc ( talk) 09:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, sourced to reprints of press releases and partnership announcements. ~ A412 talk! 08:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Alshowkan doesn't seem to meet any of the WP:NACADEMIC criteria, having reached Assistant Professor before leaving for industry. His current post (from the references) is "postdoctoral scholar". His important work seems to have been done as part of a team at Oak Ridge. Considering WP:BIO, there are some prizes ('top 100' listing in an industry magazine), but this doesn't seem sufficiently notable. My searches don't find more to add to the notability argument (including looking at Scopus and Google Scholar listings, which are linked). Klbrain ( talk) 07:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2009#July – September. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
All the supplied sources are from July 2009. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 07:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Problematic smartphone use. I'm not sure that this is the most appropriate Merge/Redirect target but it's the option that seems to carry the most opinions for it. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Not notable enough for its own article, considering we have many articles on the broader subject. Worth merging into a section in another article, maybe Problematic smartphone use § Prevalence. Dan • ✉ 13:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
This is moreorless a term describing an event that is happening during a certain point in history. there are many notable sources just about describing the details the impact of what is behimd the term. this is lookijg towqrds being a very prevelant thing that prevails in gen alpha kids. in my opinion, keep for now and let the article be expanded from the sources provided. another suggestion i have is to expand if with sources using the term "brainrot", a new word meaning content presumably of poor value and supposedly could hinder development of adolescent minds
right now the article is very bare and it would benefjr greatly from an expanaion, which i believe contributed greatly to the inititiation of the afd discussion — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.179.162.206 ( talk) 14:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
* This could probably be merged to the
Generation Alpha article (if reliable sources are describing Generation Alpha as 'iPad kids' that is). I see that it's already in there at
Generation Alpha#iPad Kids, so delete this standalone article.
Some1 (
talk) 23:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus to merge, but to what?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🍪
Cookie
Monster 13:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need a merge target
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. There was no support for redirecting to any other article. ✗ plicit 01:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG; some sources are questionable. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 04:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Note to closing admin. I ask please that if it comes to the stage where this may be deleted, we could look at the alternative of redirecting it to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create another page such as Channel 25 low-power TV stations in California or similar, thus preserving the history. I've also noticed that KSPK-LD, KBRO-LD and KJCS-LD are up for Deletion Nomination. Could we please look at doing similar for those. Perhaps redirect to Channel 25 low-power TV stations in the United States or create Low-power TV stations in Colorado. It would be a shame as there was work put into them by others and a redirect and merge is always a good alternative consideration. Thanks Karl Twist ( talk) 12:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A discussion of possible redirect targets would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎ 10:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Persecution of Ahmadis#2014. Liz Read! Talk! 05:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
3 of the sources are actually dated from before this event. The remaining sources are all from the time of event. No lasting impact or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 06:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:BASIC. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf ( talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. If you want a Keep vote to be taken seriously, bring the reliable sources you found into this discussion so they can be evaluated, don't just do a web search.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:17, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, I don't see any consensus here for any particular outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 03:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please remember to sign all comments in a discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 07:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 08:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Promotional article from an editor with possible COI. BEFORE does not help. In short, non-notable journalist. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:09, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
No notable pro wrestling title. A regional title active for a few years. Lack of third party reliable sources focusing on the title besides a few WP:ROUTINE results. HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 13:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Street dog#India. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Quite obviously fails WP:GNG. Unencyclopedic, essay-like article. Do we really need a Wikipedia article on stray dogs in India? 🐱FatCat96🐱 Chat with Cat 05:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Everything on this page can all fit in Granulomatous amoebic encephalitis so it would simply be best to redirect it and merge. Okmrman ( talk) 04:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 03:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable location. Per reference 3 (the only source of information that could be found) this was just a rural station with a nearby school and (for a big fat six years) a post office. These features could commonly be found in remote areas during the 19th century and do not amount to a "community", let alone one that is still recognized as such. No other information could be found and satellite view shows just a railroad track with a single farm nearby: [17]. Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Lacey, Washington. Liz Read! Talk! 04:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. This place is just a non-notable intersection. It was possibly once known as "Mushroom Corner" for a nearby mushroom farm, but that's an informal designation and does not amount to a "community". Today this is a busy intersection in a residential area of Lacey, WA, not a community in its own right, if it ever was. Furthermore, the article's second section is unsourced and WP:NOTNEWS applies even if it were. This place fails WP:GEOLAND. Thurston County does recognize a Mushroom Corner voting precinct: [18] but otherwise nothing could be found. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. I'm closing this as Delete as I do not care for a Merge tagging from a main space article to a User page. Just my preference. If any editor would like to work with this article, it can be restored to Draft space on request. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Only passing mentions of this place could be found: [20], [21], [22]. All of these indicate this was just a sawmill and never a "community". The existence of a post office is not significant, since in the pre-automobile era factory workers often lived at the facilities where they worked, so a post office would be necessary. And according to an article found by another user ( [23]), the post office was barely a post office. Current satellite view just shows an industrial building surrounded by residential areas. Fails WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Military organization#Commands, formations, and units. There is no real consensus for any outcome but I'm going to use administrative/closer's discretion and close this as a Redirect. Content is in the page history if anyone cares to Merge its content. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced stub, with a request for references since 2011. One broken footnote to a general search. My BEFORE suggests this is a generic term used in various fields, and I can't confirm that there is a specific use of this in military. Our article fails WP:OR, WP:GNG and WP:V. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: So far, nobody wants to keep, so this is probably going to be deleted if nobody can come up with an alternative such as merging or redirecting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:28, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
a suitable glossary article. BusterD ( talk) 14:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Soft tennis at the 2022 Asian Games. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. Falls very short on the relevant SNG criteria. And that guidance pretty clearly says why it has noot GNG coverage or even is likely to possibly have it. Has only one source with is stats-only by the folks who ran it. North8000 ( talk) 18:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 06:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. Stub about a planned future television series that does not exist yet. No sources except ope brief announcement. North8000 ( talk) 18:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of car manufacturers of the United Kingdom#Former manufacturers. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 00:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing RS which could be considered JMWt ( talk) 18:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus split between redirect and delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Article is thinly sourced and has only been marginally improved since 2011. Unclear to me if the company was ever significant. William Graham talk 01:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable company GraziePrego ( talk) 00:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)