The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM ( talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Source | Analysis | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
#1 | not significant ("Suster also founded LaunchPad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#2 | dead link, not on the wayback machine. | ✗ |
#3 | note that this is a blog hosted by the NYT, not the NYT proper. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#4 | blog on medium dot com. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#5 | forbes contributor, not reliable. | ✗ |
#6 | own website, not independent. | ✗ |
#7 | A real source! But a local one. | ~ |
#8 | the noticeboard doesn't have a clear consensus on pando as a source. Dubious. | ~ |
#9 | techcrunch "may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability". | ✗ |
#10 | another forbes contributor. | ✗ |
#11 | not significant ("went on [...] to become a partner at a tech accelerator, Launchpad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#12 | not independent ("customer stories" section) | ✗ |
#13 | another real but local source. | ~ |
#14 | plausibly real, local. | ~ |
#15 | blog and not independent. | ✗ |
#16 | business insider syndicated content "should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher." this is syndicated from a medium blog. not reliable. | ✗ |
#17 | local and not significant ("I applied to LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#18 | business insider is dubiously reliable, and it's a passing mention anyway ("Incubated at the SoCal tech accelerator Launchpad LA") | ✗ |
#19 | Passing mention ("which was part of incubator Launchpad LA") in a dubiously reliable source. | ✗ |
#20 | Local source again, focused on the company they funded. | ✗ |
#21 | Not actually mentioned in this source. | ✗ |
#22 | passing mention ("came out of the accelerator program LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#23 | Not significant, reliable, or independent (podcast by someone whose company was funded) | ✗ |
Keep . Per the evaluation above sources 7, 13 and 14 are reliable sources. LA Business Journal is a notable publication. Z3r0h3r000 ( talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 12:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM ( talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Source | Analysis | Conclusion |
---|---|---|
#1 | not significant ("Suster also founded LaunchPad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#2 | dead link, not on the wayback machine. | ✗ |
#3 | note that this is a blog hosted by the NYT, not the NYT proper. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#4 | blog on medium dot com. Not reliable. | ✗ |
#5 | forbes contributor, not reliable. | ✗ |
#6 | own website, not independent. | ✗ |
#7 | A real source! But a local one. | ~ |
#8 | the noticeboard doesn't have a clear consensus on pando as a source. Dubious. | ~ |
#9 | techcrunch "may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability". | ✗ |
#10 | another forbes contributor. | ✗ |
#11 | not significant ("went on [...] to become a partner at a tech accelerator, Launchpad LA", end coverage). | ✗ |
#12 | not independent ("customer stories" section) | ✗ |
#13 | another real but local source. | ~ |
#14 | plausibly real, local. | ~ |
#15 | blog and not independent. | ✗ |
#16 | business insider syndicated content "should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher." this is syndicated from a medium blog. not reliable. | ✗ |
#17 | local and not significant ("I applied to LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#18 | business insider is dubiously reliable, and it's a passing mention anyway ("Incubated at the SoCal tech accelerator Launchpad LA") | ✗ |
#19 | Passing mention ("which was part of incubator Launchpad LA") in a dubiously reliable source. | ✗ |
#20 | Local source again, focused on the company they funded. | ✗ |
#21 | Not actually mentioned in this source. | ✗ |
#22 | passing mention ("came out of the accelerator program LaunchpadLA"). | ✗ |
#23 | Not significant, reliable, or independent (podcast by someone whose company was funded) | ✗ |
Keep . Per the evaluation above sources 7, 13 and 14 are reliable sources. LA Business Journal is a notable publication. Z3r0h3r000 ( talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 11:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 09:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)