21:1921:19, 27 April 2024diffhist−939
Mansplaining
This whole sentence is pretty iffy, but the bit about "Damonsplaining" is beyond
WP:UNDUE. It's a one-off jokey coinage that someone used once, not even remotely parallel with other uses. It would still be undue in the body of the article, let alone the lead, which is supposed to summarize the rest, and is additionally useless to those who don't recognize the name anyway.currentTag: references removed
16:2916:29, 3 April 2024diffhist−229
Steganography
re-reverting the addition...the user who added has a history of self-promo, which I've been trying to clean up (see my recent edits); moreover, it's unclear how this image relates to the topic. Sure, the current image isn't great, but it's also not animated (another strike against a lead image), but it doesn't have to be for article identification purpose
21:1021:10, 25 March 2024diffhist−1,212
Methylamine
Undid revision
1215546625 by
Heyallkatehere (
talk) This one doesn't...see
WP:IPC. See my original removal, that this adds nothing to the article other than reiterating what was immediately above it. Again, something lthat amounts to "this one chemical was mentioned in this one tv show" adds no understanding to the articleTags: UndoRevertedsection blanking
18:5018:50, 23 March 2024diffhist−1,247
Otherkin
cripes, didn't this awful infobox get deleted? regardless, it's especially useless and inappropriate here anyway
21:1921:19, 27 April 2024diffhist−939
Mansplaining
This whole sentence is pretty iffy, but the bit about "Damonsplaining" is beyond
WP:UNDUE. It's a one-off jokey coinage that someone used once, not even remotely parallel with other uses. It would still be undue in the body of the article, let alone the lead, which is supposed to summarize the rest, and is additionally useless to those who don't recognize the name anyway.currentTag: references removed
16:2916:29, 3 April 2024diffhist−229
Steganography
re-reverting the addition...the user who added has a history of self-promo, which I've been trying to clean up (see my recent edits); moreover, it's unclear how this image relates to the topic. Sure, the current image isn't great, but it's also not animated (another strike against a lead image), but it doesn't have to be for article identification purpose
21:1021:10, 25 March 2024diffhist−1,212
Methylamine
Undid revision
1215546625 by
Heyallkatehere (
talk) This one doesn't...see
WP:IPC. See my original removal, that this adds nothing to the article other than reiterating what was immediately above it. Again, something lthat amounts to "this one chemical was mentioned in this one tv show" adds no understanding to the articleTags: UndoRevertedsection blanking
18:5018:50, 23 March 2024diffhist−1,247
Otherkin
cripes, didn't this awful infobox get deleted? regardless, it's especially useless and inappropriate here anyway