The result was redirect to Survivor: One World. There is consensus that there is insufficient sourcing for Spradlin to have a standalone page, however there is no clear consensus on target nor any indication further input is forthcoming. Since she won this season, I went with that as the target but this element of the close is an editorial decision and a new target can be chosen through the same process, if needed. Star Mississippi 14:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Notable for only winning Survivor: One World. Everything else she has done since seems resume-building, not indication of notability, and probably fan-titillating. The Jeopardy reference is just mere reference to her One World win.
Should be redirected to either (preferably) Survivor: One World or (alternatively) List of Survivor (American TV series) contestants. If WP:BLP1E doesn't apply, how about WP:BIO1E or WP:PAGEDECIDE instead? George Ho ( talk) 03:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
In terms of what might be valuable in a merge, a general bio might include where a contestant is from, their occupation, and any personal details that were significant in how they played the game.That's something that Fandom can do, can't it?
inaccessible to the people who come to Wikipedia for information—because deleted articles are removed from Wikipedia and Internet search results.I apppreciate your concerns about effects on accessibility, but being removed from search results doesn't mean info is valuable. Sometimes, being part of search engine results, like Google, is more like... clickbait?
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
13:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There seems to be consensus that a redirect would not work due to other films by the same name, and nor would a DAB as those are also non notable therefore, no ATD available. Should that change down the road, happy to restore the history under a redirect. Star Mississippi 14:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFF and WP:NFSOURCES as non-notable, incomplete, unreleased film, lacking significant coverage to establish notability. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 09:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:PLACEOUTCOMES, same xls source as the other Iran AfDs. Hongsy ( talk) 14:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
No independent notability; brief one sentence mentions of managed properties in top listings and changes in management/hiring/layoffs does not qualify; see WP:SERIESA and WP:CORPDEPTH lizthegrey ( talk) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet notability standards, sources are all just press releases and one is a job listing. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Geoff | Who, me? 22:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. Relies on primary and self-published sources rather than
independent, third party publications. Reads like a resume and/or listing of projects and prizes.
Primarily promotional in tone.
Geoff |
Who, me?
22:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space yvanyblog (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Article on a non-notable, seemingly long-defunct website, originally created by the editor of the site. Only one of the external links is actually still active, and it would not be considered significant coverage in a reliable source. Searches turned up no additional coverage on the website, making it a failure of the WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. The article was WP:PRODed shortly after its creation in 2006, but that was contested by the article creator, so I am bringing it to AFD now. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Despite all the subjects achievement there seems to be little written about him by reliable sources. His books get him close to WP:AUTHOR but there is still a significant gap. So many of the sources are by him or are interviews of him and these do not count for notability. Before searches here in Europe have failed to find anything which really stacks up. As it stands it fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 18:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 23:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
There seems to be a number of sources that use information from the Index, but virtually no sources about the Index, indicating that the Cook Partisan Voting Index is not independently notable. Cortador ( talk) 21:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
References
HudecEmil ( talk) 22:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This article was previously deleted and still does not pass WP:BIO. FULBERT ( talk) 21:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to the next episode of "not every two teams that have ever played each other are rivals". The page is based mostly on primary sources of match data sheets. Only one source, from 2006, mentions a rivalry but it is now lost to time after Eurosport was amalgamated into TNT. We need to remember that journalists and media throw the "rivalry" word around, look here at a recent news headline calling Everton and Luton rivals, two teams and cities with zero connection to each other. [6] Wikipedia is WP:NOTSTATS for a comparison between these two teams or what players have played the most times in this random pairing of teams. There are rivalries that exist because the teams every so often meet at tournaments, but the Argentina–England football rivalry is so because of the jingoistic nature of both countries' media, rather than simply playing each other at high stakes a lot. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 20:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
"not every two teams that have ever played each other are rivals"- These types of comments aren't necessary, helpful or wiki-like. KatoKungLee ( talk) 21:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. The subject made three appearances for his respective national team as a teenager. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Acute accent. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Cyrillic letters marked with the acute accent for syllabic stress (as used in dictionaries and readers) are not distinct letters or “stressed variants” of letters, and don’t belong to any national alphabet. The articles about them are not notable subjects meeting WP:GNG, but merely the cross-section of the subject of the respective base letter with Acute accent or Stress (linguistics).
These articles were all previously AFD’d and soft deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A with acute (Cyrillic). New edits didn’t discuss nor address the reasons for deletion. — Michael Z. 18:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Other nominees are:
— Michael Z. 18:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hip Hop Pantsula. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This is an extended version of
O Mang?. If I'm not mistaken, a deluxe or extended version is not eligible for a standalone article therefore this should be merged into O Mang?. dxneo (
talk)
17:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is only one article included in this AFD deletion discussion. To do a bundled nomination, please see guidelines at
WP:AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a footballer with just two seasons of experience in the lower ranks professional football. He fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV ( [10]), all sources in the article are non-independent (transfer reports from his clubs at the time, and name mentions from Football League reports). I could not find anything relevant or even close to noteworthy by searching for the subject around the Web. Angelo ( talk) 17:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. In addition to being a clear minority, arguments in favor of keeping the argument did not provide evidence to refute the core claims of the deletion argument, which is that lasting notability for the session in itself, independent of the notable matters that were discussed in it, has not been demonstrated. signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
In India, Parliament sits at least three times a year - in the Budget, Monsoon, and Winter sessions. These sessions last for months, and discuss and promulgate many pieces of legislation, similar to the sessions of other countries. When even the Budget sessions, arguably the most important parliamentary sessions, do not get their own individual articles, I fail to see how this five-day session, that passed one single piece of legislation, is notable.
Most of the article is either a list of individual statements and minor speeches made by politicians or a load of media speculation that turned out to be nothingburgers. We shouldn't include these since WP is NOTNEWS (nor is it the Hansard).
There are two, and only two, notable things in this article, and none are inherent to this special session - Parliament started functioning in a new building, and the Women's Reservation Bill was passed as the 106th Amendment. The Amendment already has its own article, and the information about the inauguration of the building more properly belongs to the New Parliament House, New Delhi article. Other articles that can absorb info from here include 17th Lok Sabha and second Modi ministry.
The article subject - the special session itself - shows no enduring relevance; searches for "special session" dropped sharply after the close of the session, and even the sources themselves talk less about the importance of the special session and more about the Amendment. Thus, in my view, the article should be deleted. W. Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ c) 15:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I leave the suggested page move to regular editing. RL0919 ( talk) 21:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable short film, unsourced since October 2007. Newspapers.com only turned up advertisements or theater schedules with no significant coverage and I could not find mentions elsewhere.
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)
Talk to Me!
18:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The book notes: "Our Country Cousins [KC-240] (June 6, 1914) Ir (943/1000 ft.). D: Mack Sennett. C: Unknown. WT: Rube Elopement. A country boy elopes with a farmer's niece pursued by cops, who must rescue the girl when she falls down a cliff. Keystone releases list, NYMPC negative and release records and Motion Picture News all give title as above. Contrary to previous secondary source speculation, Dell Henderson did not direct this film. Previous speculation on the presence of Rube Miller and Charley Chase in the cast is unverified but unlikely, and comes from a secondary source that has proven inaccurate with regard to verifiable Keystone credits. [Filmed 5/8/14-5/18/14; Finished/ Shipped 5/24/14; Rec'd in NY 6/1/14.]"
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins." (Keystone. Sat., June C.) — The arrival of the cousin at the farm causes a lot of trouble between two of the farm hands. She decides to elope with one and the two go over a precipice. The remainder of the reel is employed in their efforts to get up again. The comedy is sure to produce a laugh, but is not equal to the usual Keystone."
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins (Keystone), June 6.— Farm characters and an elopement that has the Keystone flavor and is sure to make laughter. It has unexpected and very funny incidents and will surely make an excellent offering,"
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins (C). The farmer's niece arrives on a visit and everyone falls in love with her, more so the farmer's two sons. One of the sons decides to kidnap the maiden. He does so, but the priest refuses to marry them, and the Keystone police are forced to give assistance. This they succeed in doing only too well, and the whole thing ends in a glorious scrimmage. Released Dec. 14th, length 1000 ft."
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins.—The farmer's niece is carried off by one of his sons and the Keystone police are called in to the pursuit. The niece falls down a cliff, and most of the rest fall down a great number of times in the attempt to rescue her, their antics being certain to cause tumultuous laughter. (December 14th. 1,000 ft.)"
The review notes: "The big Keystone comedy "Our Country Cousins" was clever and amusing, the audience being impelled to laughter by the extraordinary antics of "Fatty and Mabel." The comics were good, and the orchestral music with special effects proved an enjoyable feature of the evening."
The review notes: ""Our country cousins," a Keystone comedy, was like many comic films, somewhat overdone, but it was most successful as a mirth producer."
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins" is another of those screaming Keystone comedies only this is said to be even better than a good many of them."
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins" was a very funny Keystone release featuring the famous Keystone Police."
The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 19:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Unreleased film. All sources talk about Dhanya Ramkumar, not anything else. Draft till release. DareshMohan ( talk) 17:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. Consensus is that NPSL teams do not have the presumption of notability, and that page is at Boston Aztec already. A cursory search returned no significant coverage of the organization, just lots of routine local coverage. Jay eyem ( talk) 16:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The article is little more than a database entry and my searches didn't yield anything that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources were FMF and NOI, both trivial mentions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 19:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Article does not pass GNG Iljhgtn ( talk) 15:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Passes NPOL as Minister in national cabinet. (non-admin closure) 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 06:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
The person is not notable (per politics or general notability), and the page is too promotional and flattering. Lulakayd ( talk) 15:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Working journalist and author, but doesn't meet WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 15:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It exists but I couldn't establish that it meets notability. Boleyn ( talk) 15:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G5. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject fails as Politician, fails WP:NPOL and also fails notability as a Businessman. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 14:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Failed WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, and WP:SINGER with WP:BEFORE on Google/Bing (English) and Daum/Naver (Korean) showing lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. While, she has released couple of songs, none of it charted on the Circle Digital Chart, the national chart of South Korea. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 14:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chink#United Kingdom. The history remains for a merge, which can be done editorially. Star Mississippi 14:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Uncle G ( talk) 12:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Low number of casualties. Not notable. We have a dozen of articles of massacres about the 7 October attack. We shouldn't give an article to every village where civilians were killed. That's a very low and unprecedented threshold of notability. This article is also pretty similar to most of the articles of that dozen. It can easily be merged and covered in another one as it is short. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 10:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a clear split here, relisting for more discussion as opposed to a simple NC close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references I can find meet the criteria for notability. HighKing ++ 14:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 1. "Al Maryah Community Bank appoints steering committee members". The National. Retrieved Apr 18, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 2. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank appoints board of directors". TrendsMENA. |
Fails SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth, promotional | 3. ^ "Seventh Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians - Post-COVID-19 recovery: A youth-responsive approach - Provisional Programme". Inter-Parliamentary Union ( https://www.ipu.org). |
Dead link | 4. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank completes Technology Architectural Design of its Digital Banking Platform". WAM. |
Database | 5. ^ "CBUAE Licensing Register". CBUAE. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 6. ^ "'Al Maryah Community Bank' becomes UAE's first licensed digital-only bank". Gulf News. April 13, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 7. ^ "Central Bank of the UAE grants licence to new digital bank". The National. Apr 12, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 8. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank opens its Smart Banking Hub in ADNOC Abu Dhabi". Zawya. |
Primary | 9. ^ "Branches & ATMs". www.mbank.ae. Al Maryah Community Bank. |
Google Play | 10. ^ "MBank UAE". Google Play. |
App store | 11. ^ "MBank UAE". Apple App Store. |
Primary | 12. ^ "IPO". Al Marayah Community Bank. |
Primary | 13. ^ "About". www.mbank.ae. Al Maryah Community Bank. |
The result was keep. Complex/ Rational 14:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Only source is a single Washington Post article, fails WP:SIGCOV DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 11:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Burn Notice characters. Viable ATD. History remains should sourcing eventuate for a re-spin out. Star Mississippi 14:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The vast majority of this article is overly specific WP:FANCRUFT that is not cited. The provided sources do not focus on the character much, and the article fails WP:GNG DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 11:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the discussion below @ Piotrus and TheBeachBro::
The result was merge to Tucheng (disambiguation). A majority of editors favor merging; arguments for keep were an argument from inertia, and an argument that there is an entry that could not be merged to the suggsted title. This was rebutted with reference to WP:ONEOTHER signed, Rosguill talk 16:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The entries in 土城 have a major transliteration "Tucheng" and additionally most of the entries in Tucheng (disambiguation) correspond to the Chinese characters "土城". Therefore, these dab pages could be merged, like that in Nanchan Temple (disambiguation) (from a RfD outcome) and Ni Hao. Because it's unnecessary to keep separate dab pages in the similar case, I also propose to disambiguate entries in CJKV dab pages together with their major translation if the Chinese characters also hold the major place in dab page of this translation. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 10:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Note: I choose to remove all of the bundled nominated articles per
WP:BUNDLE that An article with a fair or better chance of standing on its own merits should not be bundled—nominate it separately
.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk)
17:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
As an alternative option, Tucheng (disambiguation) has to be expanded to entries which was actually transliterated from "土城" and Tucheng District, the primary topic of "Tucheng" will also be that of "土城". Thus, 土城 will be moved to 土城 (disambiguation) and the base name will be turned into a primary redirect. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 14:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Cunard ( talk) 11:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: THere doesn't appear to be a pressing need to close this, so relisting for more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Editors are divided on whether the level of coverage rises above the WP:BLP1E level. signed, Rosguill talk 16:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. The primary basis for notability seems to be the section of the article titled "Legal issues." If that section was removed, the article would be more or less simply a promotional piece, written like a resume. See also the recent discussion at the BLP Noticeboard. Geoff | Who, me? 13:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see strong and persuasive views on both sides, but I don’t feel comfortable closing as No Consensus just yet, so I’d like more input. Do the BLP concerns trump the demonstrated notability?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NBIO. I think this is a case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL. If sources meeting WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, no objection to Drafting until it is ready for mainspace. // Timothy :: talk 10:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:Speedy keep#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no new delete rationale has been put forward in the deletion discussion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This is pure unreferenced WP:OR (the only source - single footnote - is to an 11th century poem). The topic may or may not be notable (my BEFORE gives some passing mentions, but maybe something more could be found), but I fear what we have needs WP:TNT, given the lack of sources. WP:V is a major concern, as is the possibility of WP:HOAXex or at least pure WP:OR in this. Possible ATD redirect targets, if this cannot be salvaged now, include District of Arfon and Kingdom of Gwynedd. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as a live draft already exists at Draft:Swarna Pandey which can still be worked on. Nick Moyes ( talk) 20:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space yvanyblog (talk) 08:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moved to Draftspace. (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 17:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space. yvanyblog (talk) 08:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nash Entertainment#Television programs. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2019 DonaldD23 talk to me 12:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
09:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
07:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Auction results for paintings and not much else don't add up to enough to satisfy WP:ARTIST. (From what I can see from other, non-paywalled sources, his works sell in the range of hundreds of dollars only.) Clarityfiend ( talk) 12:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The creator seems to have a possible COI with the subject. Article about a lesser-known entrepreneur, with routine/promotional sources cited as sources. Does not meet WP:GNG Thilsebatti ( talk) 07:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable law firm. Very limited sources. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability, the guy actually exists but those info showing him winning an Asian Games silver or an Asian Cup gold is completely false. he is just a bench player in some non-notable team. never played for the national team. absolutely non-notable. Sports2021 ( talk) 03:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't want to close this as a Merge to Ruslan Shostak as this article is also being considered for deletion at an AFD discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like the organization doesn't have enough notability and reliable sources to support its credibility, as well as insufficient media coverage from third-party sources on the given topic. 19 pick ups bought for the army is circulating in the news, but it's not about notability. possible promotion of the Ruslan Shostak persona as the author is the same for both pages DreamlarT ( talk) 12:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would help if any of these translated sources (or a summary of their content) was brought into this discussion or added to the article. Right now, there have been no changes to the article since it was nominated so that's what editors are judging it on.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Shiva temples in India. No participation here after two relistings so rather than a Soft Deletion, I'm redirecting this article to where the subject is mentioned. Liz Read! Talk! 00:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Generic name for Shiva temples. Covered in List of Shiva temples in India Redtigerxyz Talk 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 14:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Sourcing is of insufficient depth Star Mississippi 14:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 04:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
07:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
I suggest a redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 14:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Carcassonne (board game)#World Team Carcassonne Online Championshi. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
It does not appear that any sources outside of carcassonne.cat, the championship organizers, have written about this topic, making each of its editions fall short of WP:GNG. I attempted to search for sources online in English, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. In my searches, I did not come across anything suggesting that they or their organizers would meet GNG if considered in aggregate. signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It seems like, aside from Deletion, there are opinions to Redirect or Merge but I'd like to see a more conclusive consensus before taking action on a bundled nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Liz's last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND. No significant coverage in reliable sources. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
2023-10 ✍️ create
← 2015-10 ✗
A7
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 14:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This unsourced article has been tagged as such since 2020 and features a darts player who, according to the article itself, "never featured in the final stages of a major event". WP:BEFORE yielded a Dutch article in which he is described as an amateur ("There is no room for Bert Vlaardingerbroek is written in every darts book." Google did struggle with this one) and a piece on Forgotten Darters. It's not enough for WP:GNG and having reached the last 32 of the Winmau World Masters as the pinnacle of his career, he is not notable per WP:NSPORT. However, I did learn that there is a condition called 'Dartitis', similar to Dystonia and for that I am grateful. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
14:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
One independent source, one passing mention on Google News. Can't see how this is notable in any way. Also fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
There is one local newspaper mention: https://www.valleycenter.com/articles/water-board-to-seek-re-bids-on-reservoir-liner-project/ OmegaMantis ( talk) 22:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I think the subject is notable enough, as she is a CEO of a company and has been mentioned by multiple sources. OmegaMantis ( talk) 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
User:OmegaMantis, I assume your are arguing to Keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:SNG, WP:BASIC. Existing media citations serve as a form of promotion. Charlie ( talk) 16:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep- She is the same person Oaktree b mentioned in the sources. Masri is the one of the first women from her country to hold such a key position in Google and is known for her contributions to the technology industry. She has been also the subject of a documentary. There are also sources in Arabic language. Jabralgi ( talk) 04:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs on ESPN Radio. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG. A possible ATD is redirecting this to List of programs on ESPN Radio. Let'srun ( talk) 14:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
14:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discussion of the available sources clearly favored deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable per WP:GNG. Sources don't show significant coverage (most of them are about how he has a facial resemblance to another famous actor) and some of them are simple trivial mentions. Possible paid editing (since the original editor has created similar articles for non-notable people) Other articles by this user should be checked out as well. Arian ( talk) 18:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 1. "آیا بازیگر قدیمی تلویزیون پسر اکبر عبدی است؟". Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 2. ^ "همه زندگیام با تلویزیون عجین شده". jamejamonline. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "فردی که به خاطر شباهتش به اکبر عبدی بازیگر شد". YJC. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
A quote from subject about a film. Fails WP:IS, WP:SIGCOV | 4. ^ "یادی از سریال نوستالژی و محبوب دهه 60". Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 5. ^ "خاطره بازی آقای بازیگر از بازی با شهلا ریاحی". tabnak. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Dup of #3 above | 6. ^ "فردی که به خاطر شباهتش به اکبر عبدی بازیگر شد". asriran. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 7. ^ ""پورمحمدی" پرداخت زیاد برای دعوت مهمانان را ممنوع کرد/برنامه تحویل سال شبکه یک موفقتر عمل کرد". yjc. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 8. ^ Jump up to:a b "بچههای فیلمها و سریالهای دهه ۶۰ کجا هستند؟ +تصاویر". cinemapress. 29 April 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Database page | 9. ^ "ليست كامل عوامل فيلم سفر جادويي (1369)". sourehcinema. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 10. ^ "فردانیوز". fardanews. |
Database page | 11. ^ Dressage - Fajr Film Festival |
Brief promo for upcoming appearance | 12. ^ "یکی از مجریان نوروزی شبکه یک مشخص شد". jamejamonline. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Name mention related to another subject, fails WP:SIGCOV | 13. ^ "انيميشن "نوازنده" آماده پخش از تلويزيون شد". farsnews. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious ( talk) 08:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like the person's notability is in question, as the page is filled with press releases and other paid news. Additionally, there is a possibility that the author of the page may be a UPEditor (nature of their edits speaks by itself). DreamlarT ( talk) 12:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While it was initially asserted that the subject meets WP:NACTOR, this was called into question on the basis that sourcing was promotional in nature, and discussion of sources strongly favored deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. Charlie ( talk) 16:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo interview | 1. "Naina Sarwar makes a mark in all South Indian languages". New Indian Express. 8 April 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Promo interview | 2. ^ "Naina is Destiny's Favourite Child". New Indian Express. 4 August 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Name listed, nothing meeting SIGCOV | 3. ^ "Kolanji movie review: Father-son bonding, lacks strong story". Deccan Chronicle. 27 July 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Name listed, nothing meeting SIGCOV | 4. ^ "Eeswar's second film 'Suryapet Junction' completes the shoot!". The Times of India. 22 September 2022. |
Promo interview | 5. ^ "Naina Sarwar is set for her Telugu film debut". The Times of India. 23 August |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Yet another unsourced place-stub in Louisiana, this one is shown by the topos to be a siding just north of Lauderdale, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 03:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While some potentially-usable coverage was identified, rebuttals regarding the quality of the cited sources were not refuted, delete has a slight numerical majority, and late momentum. signed, Rosguill talk 16:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This article discusses a rivalry between teams that are not traditional rivals and do not have enough coverage for a separate article. As a result, the article doesn't meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 03:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, since there is disagreement over notability here, a source analysis would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. I was unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG. The only thing I found that comes close is this 2023 interview. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as I am unable to find sufficient independent coverage of the footballer. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Student essay. The sources are to a high school textbook, community college course notes, and StackExchange. The content itself is little more than a compilation of the ledes of the relevant main articles, where they exist, and OR (even if obviously factually correct) where they don't. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NPROF. Only criterion subject could possibly pass is prestigious national awards, but I haven't been able to find much information on the prizes even in their native languages, and hence doubt it counts as prestigious. The sources in the article currently are both primary. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure this person is notable. He is only apparently notable for his translation to Bulgarian/Slavic Macedonian of Daniel Moscopolites's dictionary (which can easily be covered in Daniel's article) and for his connection to the Miladinov brothers. There is not much else that I see that is relevant. I've been reading about the Aromanians for years and I had never seen this figure mentioned before. I also struggle to find English-language sources about him. I do not believe the article's writer has a firm grasp of our notability policy. They had previously created a separate article for Daniel's dictionary, which is the only thing that actually makes him notable in the first place. I would like the assessment of some other editors, I am not 100% sure myself what the outcome should be. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 02:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is a rough consensus to Delete this article, given
User:Brooklynlegv's comments, it would be helpful to see a source analysis from editors that have the proper language background.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Автор на македонскиот превод, поп Стефан од Охрид, за кого буквално немаме никакви податоци ... (Author of the Macedonian translation, Pop Stefan from Ohrid, about whom we literally have no information ...). What you wrote also really only confirms that he's only notable for the translation. Authors mentioning him in passing does not indicate any notability. Your contribution is appreciated, but you should find a notable subject next time. I'd also advise you to not make unfounded accusations against other editors. Focus on the content. Thank you. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Lexicon Tetraglosson is a quadrilingual lexicon of Greek, Albanian, Vlach (Aromanian), and “Bulgarian” (Macedonian dialect of Ohrid) written by Daniel Moscopolites, an Aromanian priest from Moscopole. It is assumed that the Slavic version was translated from Greek by Stefan, an Ohrid priest of Aromanian descent (Nichev, 1997).- Mentions him in passing like most sources and also solely about his translation.
With a letter from 13 April 1793, the Moscopole Sakellarios and priest Daniil informed the Ohrid Sakellarios Pop Stefan (the progenitor of the current Ohrid family, Pop Stefanievi), that he was sending him the Greek dictionary with his student to translate it into Bulgarian within a week, because after Easter he wanted to send it to Venice for printing. At the same time, he asks him to listen to the speech of his parents, so that there is no mistake ...- Simply repeats what other and newer sources know him for - his translation. Koneski, Lunt and Friedman also mention him solely for that reason. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 14:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) Eternal Shadow Talk 04:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:VICTIM. Hundreds of firefighters have died in 9/11, not all of them merit a separate article. The conditions of his death don't seem to be all that special. At best I think we could redirect this to Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks#Deaths by jumping or falling, given that this page is getting 6k views a month and its creator already wrote about Suhr there. SparklyNights ( t) 01:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRIMINAL. This person is notable for only one event, that being the crime he was convicted for, and the crime in question ( sextortion on Facebook) also seems to be relatively WP:ROUTINE in the news. People get convicted for that basically every day, that doesn't make them notable. SparklyNights ( t) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete Mach61 ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER. Searches turned up absolutely nothing and provided sources are Spotify and apple music with one other source that does not lend much to notability as well. Seems to be almost borderline A7. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 00:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a minor league footballer with a marginal professional career and no WP:SIGCOV apart from a couple transfer reports and some stats pages, therefore failing WP:GNG. [61] Angelo ( talk) 23:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally WP:PROD, the subject is a footballer with no professional career [62] and little to no coverage at all, therefore failing WP:GNG. [63] Angelo ( talk) 23:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Survivor: One World. There is consensus that there is insufficient sourcing for Spradlin to have a standalone page, however there is no clear consensus on target nor any indication further input is forthcoming. Since she won this season, I went with that as the target but this element of the close is an editorial decision and a new target can be chosen through the same process, if needed. Star Mississippi 14:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Notable for only winning Survivor: One World. Everything else she has done since seems resume-building, not indication of notability, and probably fan-titillating. The Jeopardy reference is just mere reference to her One World win.
Should be redirected to either (preferably) Survivor: One World or (alternatively) List of Survivor (American TV series) contestants. If WP:BLP1E doesn't apply, how about WP:BIO1E or WP:PAGEDECIDE instead? George Ho ( talk) 03:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
In terms of what might be valuable in a merge, a general bio might include where a contestant is from, their occupation, and any personal details that were significant in how they played the game.That's something that Fandom can do, can't it?
inaccessible to the people who come to Wikipedia for information—because deleted articles are removed from Wikipedia and Internet search results.I apppreciate your concerns about effects on accessibility, but being removed from search results doesn't mean info is valuable. Sometimes, being part of search engine results, like Google, is more like... clickbait?
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
13:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:46, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. There seems to be consensus that a redirect would not work due to other films by the same name, and nor would a DAB as those are also non notable therefore, no ATD available. Should that change down the road, happy to restore the history under a redirect. Star Mississippi 14:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFF and WP:NFSOURCES as non-notable, incomplete, unreleased film, lacking significant coverage to establish notability. The Doom Patrol ( talk) 09:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:39, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:PLACEOUTCOMES, same xls source as the other Iran AfDs. Hongsy ( talk) 14:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
20:35, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
No independent notability; brief one sentence mentions of managed properties in top listings and changes in management/hiring/layoffs does not qualify; see WP:SERIESA and WP:CORPDEPTH lizthegrey ( talk) 18:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet notability standards, sources are all just press releases and one is a job listing. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 20:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:50, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:24, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Geoff | Who, me? 22:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. Relies on primary and self-published sources rather than
independent, third party publications. Reads like a resume and/or listing of projects and prizes.
Primarily promotional in tone.
Geoff |
Who, me?
22:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space yvanyblog (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Article on a non-notable, seemingly long-defunct website, originally created by the editor of the site. Only one of the external links is actually still active, and it would not be considered significant coverage in a reliable source. Searches turned up no additional coverage on the website, making it a failure of the WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. The article was WP:PRODed shortly after its creation in 2006, but that was contested by the article creator, so I am bringing it to AFD now. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Despite all the subjects achievement there seems to be little written about him by reliable sources. His books get him close to WP:AUTHOR but there is still a significant gap. So many of the sources are by him or are interviews of him and these do not count for notability. Before searches here in Europe have failed to find anything which really stacks up. As it stands it fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 18:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
21:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 23:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
There seems to be a number of sources that use information from the Index, but virtually no sources about the Index, indicating that the Cook Partisan Voting Index is not independently notable. Cortador ( talk) 21:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
References
HudecEmil ( talk) 22:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yeshiva Gedola of Carteret. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This article was previously deleted and still does not pass WP:BIO. FULBERT ( talk) 21:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to the next episode of "not every two teams that have ever played each other are rivals". The page is based mostly on primary sources of match data sheets. Only one source, from 2006, mentions a rivalry but it is now lost to time after Eurosport was amalgamated into TNT. We need to remember that journalists and media throw the "rivalry" word around, look here at a recent news headline calling Everton and Luton rivals, two teams and cities with zero connection to each other. [6] Wikipedia is WP:NOTSTATS for a comparison between these two teams or what players have played the most times in this random pairing of teams. There are rivalries that exist because the teams every so often meet at tournaments, but the Argentina–England football rivalry is so because of the jingoistic nature of both countries' media, rather than simply playing each other at high stakes a lot. Unknown Temptation ( talk) 20:58, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
"not every two teams that have ever played each other are rivals"- These types of comments aren't necessary, helpful or wiki-like. KatoKungLee ( talk) 21:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. RL0919 ( talk) 21:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of New Caledonia international footballers. The subject made three appearances for his respective national team as a teenager. I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Acute accent. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Cyrillic letters marked with the acute accent for syllabic stress (as used in dictionaries and readers) are not distinct letters or “stressed variants” of letters, and don’t belong to any national alphabet. The articles about them are not notable subjects meeting WP:GNG, but merely the cross-section of the subject of the respective base letter with Acute accent or Stress (linguistics).
These articles were all previously AFD’d and soft deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A with acute (Cyrillic). New edits didn’t discuss nor address the reasons for deletion. — Michael Z. 18:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Other nominees are:
— Michael Z. 18:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hip Hop Pantsula. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This is an extended version of
O Mang?. If I'm not mistaken, a deluxe or extended version is not eligible for a standalone article therefore this should be merged into O Mang?. dxneo (
talk)
17:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There is only one article included in this AFD deletion discussion. To do a bundled nomination, please see guidelines at
WP:AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a footballer with just two seasons of experience in the lower ranks professional football. He fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV ( [10]), all sources in the article are non-independent (transfer reports from his clubs at the time, and name mentions from Football League reports). I could not find anything relevant or even close to noteworthy by searching for the subject around the Web. Angelo ( talk) 17:25, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. In addition to being a clear minority, arguments in favor of keeping the argument did not provide evidence to refute the core claims of the deletion argument, which is that lasting notability for the session in itself, independent of the notable matters that were discussed in it, has not been demonstrated. signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
In India, Parliament sits at least three times a year - in the Budget, Monsoon, and Winter sessions. These sessions last for months, and discuss and promulgate many pieces of legislation, similar to the sessions of other countries. When even the Budget sessions, arguably the most important parliamentary sessions, do not get their own individual articles, I fail to see how this five-day session, that passed one single piece of legislation, is notable.
Most of the article is either a list of individual statements and minor speeches made by politicians or a load of media speculation that turned out to be nothingburgers. We shouldn't include these since WP is NOTNEWS (nor is it the Hansard).
There are two, and only two, notable things in this article, and none are inherent to this special session - Parliament started functioning in a new building, and the Women's Reservation Bill was passed as the 106th Amendment. The Amendment already has its own article, and the information about the inauguration of the building more properly belongs to the New Parliament House, New Delhi article. Other articles that can absorb info from here include 17th Lok Sabha and second Modi ministry.
The article subject - the special session itself - shows no enduring relevance; searches for "special session" dropped sharply after the close of the session, and even the sources themselves talk less about the importance of the special session and more about the Amendment. Thus, in my view, the article should be deleted. W. Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ c) 15:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
18:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. I leave the suggested page move to regular editing. RL0919 ( talk) 21:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable short film, unsourced since October 2007. Newspapers.com only turned up advertisements or theater schedules with no significant coverage and I could not find mentions elsewhere.
ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)
Talk to Me!
18:08, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The book notes: "Our Country Cousins [KC-240] (June 6, 1914) Ir (943/1000 ft.). D: Mack Sennett. C: Unknown. WT: Rube Elopement. A country boy elopes with a farmer's niece pursued by cops, who must rescue the girl when she falls down a cliff. Keystone releases list, NYMPC negative and release records and Motion Picture News all give title as above. Contrary to previous secondary source speculation, Dell Henderson did not direct this film. Previous speculation on the presence of Rube Miller and Charley Chase in the cast is unverified but unlikely, and comes from a secondary source that has proven inaccurate with regard to verifiable Keystone credits. [Filmed 5/8/14-5/18/14; Finished/ Shipped 5/24/14; Rec'd in NY 6/1/14.]"
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins." (Keystone. Sat., June C.) — The arrival of the cousin at the farm causes a lot of trouble between two of the farm hands. She decides to elope with one and the two go over a precipice. The remainder of the reel is employed in their efforts to get up again. The comedy is sure to produce a laugh, but is not equal to the usual Keystone."
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins (Keystone), June 6.— Farm characters and an elopement that has the Keystone flavor and is sure to make laughter. It has unexpected and very funny incidents and will surely make an excellent offering,"
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins (C). The farmer's niece arrives on a visit and everyone falls in love with her, more so the farmer's two sons. One of the sons decides to kidnap the maiden. He does so, but the priest refuses to marry them, and the Keystone police are forced to give assistance. This they succeed in doing only too well, and the whole thing ends in a glorious scrimmage. Released Dec. 14th, length 1000 ft."
The article notes: "Our Country Cousins.—The farmer's niece is carried off by one of his sons and the Keystone police are called in to the pursuit. The niece falls down a cliff, and most of the rest fall down a great number of times in the attempt to rescue her, their antics being certain to cause tumultuous laughter. (December 14th. 1,000 ft.)"
The review notes: "The big Keystone comedy "Our Country Cousins" was clever and amusing, the audience being impelled to laughter by the extraordinary antics of "Fatty and Mabel." The comics were good, and the orchestral music with special effects proved an enjoyable feature of the evening."
The review notes: ""Our country cousins," a Keystone comedy, was like many comic films, somewhat overdone, but it was most successful as a mirth producer."
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins" is another of those screaming Keystone comedies only this is said to be even better than a good many of them."
The article notes: ""Our Country Cousins" was a very funny Keystone release featuring the famous Keystone Police."
The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 19:29, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Unreleased film. All sources talk about Dhanya Ramkumar, not anything else. Draft till release. DareshMohan ( talk) 17:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. Consensus is that NPSL teams do not have the presumption of notability, and that page is at Boston Aztec already. A cursory search returned no significant coverage of the organization, just lots of routine local coverage. Jay eyem ( talk) 16:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The article is little more than a database entry and my searches didn't yield anything that would satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC. Best sources were FMF and NOI, both trivial mentions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 19:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Article does not pass GNG Iljhgtn ( talk) 15:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Passes NPOL as Minister in national cabinet. (non-admin closure) 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙♂️ Let's Talk ! 06:14, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
The person is not notable (per politics or general notability), and the page is too promotional and flattering. Lulakayd ( talk) 15:35, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Working journalist and author, but doesn't meet WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 15:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It exists but I couldn't establish that it meets notability. Boleyn ( talk) 15:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G5. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject fails as Politician, fails WP:NPOL and also fails notability as a Businessman. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 14:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:34, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Failed WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, and WP:SINGER with WP:BEFORE on Google/Bing (English) and Daum/Naver (Korean) showing lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable sources. While, she has released couple of songs, none of it charted on the Circle Digital Chart, the national chart of South Korea. — Paper9oll ( 🔔 • 📝) 14:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chink#United Kingdom. The history remains for a merge, which can be done editorially. Star Mississippi 14:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Uncle G ( talk) 12:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Low number of casualties. Not notable. We have a dozen of articles of massacres about the 7 October attack. We shouldn't give an article to every village where civilians were killed. That's a very low and unprecedented threshold of notability. This article is also pretty similar to most of the articles of that dozen. It can easily be merged and covered in another one as it is short. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 10:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a clear split here, relisting for more discussion as opposed to a simple NC close.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:35, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a company therefore GNG/ WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references I can find meet the criteria for notability. HighKing ++ 14:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 1. "Al Maryah Community Bank appoints steering committee members". The National. Retrieved Apr 18, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 2. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank appoints board of directors". TrendsMENA. |
Fails SIGCOV, does not address the subject directly and indepth, promotional | 3. ^ "Seventh Global Conference of Young Parliamentarians - Post-COVID-19 recovery: A youth-responsive approach - Provisional Programme". Inter-Parliamentary Union ( https://www.ipu.org). |
Dead link | 4. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank completes Technology Architectural Design of its Digital Banking Platform". WAM. |
Database | 5. ^ "CBUAE Licensing Register". CBUAE. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 6. ^ "'Al Maryah Community Bank' becomes UAE's first licensed digital-only bank". Gulf News. April 13, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 7. ^ "Central Bank of the UAE grants licence to new digital bank". The National. Apr 12, 2021. |
Routine business news, promotional, seems to be sourced from a press release or company provided info | 8. ^ "Al Maryah Community Bank opens its Smart Banking Hub in ADNOC Abu Dhabi". Zawya. |
Primary | 9. ^ "Branches & ATMs". www.mbank.ae. Al Maryah Community Bank. |
Google Play | 10. ^ "MBank UAE". Google Play. |
App store | 11. ^ "MBank UAE". Apple App Store. |
Primary | 12. ^ "IPO". Al Marayah Community Bank. |
Primary | 13. ^ "About". www.mbank.ae. Al Maryah Community Bank. |
The result was keep. Complex/ Rational 14:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Only source is a single Washington Post article, fails WP:SIGCOV DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 11:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Burn Notice characters. Viable ATD. History remains should sourcing eventuate for a re-spin out. Star Mississippi 14:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The vast majority of this article is overly specific WP:FANCRUFT that is not cited. The provided sources do not focus on the character much, and the article fails WP:GNG DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 11:12, 18 November 2023 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the discussion below @ Piotrus and TheBeachBro::
The result was merge to Tucheng (disambiguation). A majority of editors favor merging; arguments for keep were an argument from inertia, and an argument that there is an entry that could not be merged to the suggsted title. This was rebutted with reference to WP:ONEOTHER signed, Rosguill talk 16:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The entries in 土城 have a major transliteration "Tucheng" and additionally most of the entries in Tucheng (disambiguation) correspond to the Chinese characters "土城". Therefore, these dab pages could be merged, like that in Nanchan Temple (disambiguation) (from a RfD outcome) and Ni Hao. Because it's unnecessary to keep separate dab pages in the similar case, I also propose to disambiguate entries in CJKV dab pages together with their major translation if the Chinese characters also hold the major place in dab page of this translation. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 10:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Note: I choose to remove all of the bundled nominated articles per
WP:BUNDLE that An article with a fair or better chance of standing on its own merits should not be bundled—nominate it separately
.
NmWTfs85lXusaybq (
talk)
17:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
As an alternative option, Tucheng (disambiguation) has to be expanded to entries which was actually transliterated from "土城" and Tucheng District, the primary topic of "Tucheng" will also be that of "土城". Thus, 土城 will be moved to 土城 (disambiguation) and the base name will be turned into a primary redirect. NmWTfs85lXusaybq ( talk) 14:12, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Cunard ( talk) 11:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: THere doesn't appear to be a pressing need to close this, so relisting for more discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Black Kite (talk)
11:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Editors are divided on whether the level of coverage rises above the WP:BLP1E level. signed, Rosguill talk 16:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. The primary basis for notability seems to be the section of the article titled "Legal issues." If that section was removed, the article would be more or less simply a promotional piece, written like a resume. See also the recent discussion at the BLP Noticeboard. Geoff | Who, me? 13:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I see strong and persuasive views on both sides, but I don’t feel comfortable closing as No Consensus just yet, so I’d like more input. Do the BLP concerns trump the demonstrated notability?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
10:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Mojo Hand ( talk) 17:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NBIO. I think this is a case of WP:NOTMEMORIAL. If sources meeting WP:IS, WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, no objection to Drafting until it is ready for mainspace. // Timothy :: talk 10:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:Speedy keep#1. The nominator has withdrawn the nomination and no new delete rationale has been put forward in the deletion discussion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This is pure unreferenced WP:OR (the only source - single footnote - is to an 11th century poem). The topic may or may not be notable (my BEFORE gives some passing mentions, but maybe something more could be found), but I fear what we have needs WP:TNT, given the lack of sources. WP:V is a major concern, as is the possibility of WP:HOAXex or at least pure WP:OR in this. Possible ATD redirect targets, if this cannot be salvaged now, include District of Arfon and Kingdom of Gwynedd. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as a live draft already exists at Draft:Swarna Pandey which can still be worked on. Nick Moyes ( talk) 20:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space yvanyblog (talk) 08:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was Moved to Draftspace. (non-admin closure) BangJan1999 17:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Should be moved to draft space. yvanyblog (talk) 08:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nash Entertainment#Television programs. Liz Read! Talk! 08:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2019 DonaldD23 talk to me 12:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
09:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
07:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Auction results for paintings and not much else don't add up to enough to satisfy WP:ARTIST. (From what I can see from other, non-paywalled sources, his works sell in the range of hundreds of dollars only.) Clarityfiend ( talk) 12:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The creator seems to have a possible COI with the subject. Article about a lesser-known entrepreneur, with routine/promotional sources cited as sources. Does not meet WP:GNG Thilsebatti ( talk) 07:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:59, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable law firm. Very limited sources. Orphaned for a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 08:04, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability, the guy actually exists but those info showing him winning an Asian Games silver or an Asian Cup gold is completely false. he is just a bench player in some non-notable team. never played for the national team. absolutely non-notable. Sports2021 ( talk) 03:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:54, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't want to close this as a Merge to Ruslan Shostak as this article is also being considered for deletion at an AFD discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like the organization doesn't have enough notability and reliable sources to support its credibility, as well as insufficient media coverage from third-party sources on the given topic. 19 pick ups bought for the army is circulating in the news, but it's not about notability. possible promotion of the Ruslan Shostak persona as the author is the same for both pages DreamlarT ( talk) 12:45, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
05:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would help if any of these translated sources (or a summary of their content) was brought into this discussion or added to the article. Right now, there have been no changes to the article since it was nominated so that's what editors are judging it on.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Shiva temples in India. No participation here after two relistings so rather than a Soft Deletion, I'm redirecting this article to where the subject is mentioned. Liz Read! Talk! 00:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Generic name for Shiva temples. Covered in List of Shiva temples in India Redtigerxyz Talk 06:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Liz Read! Talk! 08:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 14:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Sourcing is of insufficient depth Star Mississippi 14:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources in the article are primary, a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Law & Order characters. Spinixster (chat!) 04:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
07:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
I suggest a redirect to List of Law & Order characters. Micheal Kaluba ( talk) 14:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Carcassonne (board game)#World Team Carcassonne Online Championshi. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
It does not appear that any sources outside of carcassonne.cat, the championship organizers, have written about this topic, making each of its editions fall short of WP:GNG. I attempted to search for sources online in English, Catalan, Spanish, Portuguese, and French. In my searches, I did not come across anything suggesting that they or their organizers would meet GNG if considered in aggregate. signed, Rosguill talk 15:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It seems like, aside from Deletion, there are opinions to Redirect or Merge but I'd like to see a more conclusive consensus before taking action on a bundled nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per Liz's last relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND. No significant coverage in reliable sources. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:08, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
2023-10 ✍️ create
← 2015-10 ✗
A7
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
11:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 14:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This unsourced article has been tagged as such since 2020 and features a darts player who, according to the article itself, "never featured in the final stages of a major event". WP:BEFORE yielded a Dutch article in which he is described as an amateur ("There is no room for Bert Vlaardingerbroek is written in every darts book." Google did struggle with this one) and a piece on Forgotten Darters. It's not enough for WP:GNG and having reached the last 32 of the Winmau World Masters as the pinnacle of his career, he is not notable per WP:NSPORT. However, I did learn that there is a condition called 'Dartitis', similar to Dystonia and for that I am grateful. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 05:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
14:25, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
One independent source, one passing mention on Google News. Can't see how this is notable in any way. Also fails WP:GNG. Uhooep ( talk) 23:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
There is one local newspaper mention: https://www.valleycenter.com/articles/water-board-to-seek-re-bids-on-reservoir-liner-project/ OmegaMantis ( talk) 22:07, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I think the subject is notable enough, as she is a CEO of a company and has been mentioned by multiple sources. OmegaMantis ( talk) 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
User:OmegaMantis, I assume your are arguing to Keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:47, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:45, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:SNG, WP:BASIC. Existing media citations serve as a form of promotion. Charlie ( talk) 16:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep- She is the same person Oaktree b mentioned in the sources. Masri is the one of the first women from her country to hold such a key position in Google and is known for her contributions to the technology industry. She has been also the subject of a documentary. There are also sources in Arabic language. Jabralgi ( talk) 04:24, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of programs on ESPN Radio. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG. A possible ATD is redirecting this to List of programs on ESPN Radio. Let'srun ( talk) 14:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
14:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Discussion of the available sources clearly favored deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable per WP:GNG. Sources don't show significant coverage (most of them are about how he has a facial resemblance to another famous actor) and some of them are simple trivial mentions. Possible paid editing (since the original editor has created similar articles for non-notable people) Other articles by this user should be checked out as well. Arian ( talk) 18:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Maliner (
talk)
19:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus right now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 1. "آیا بازیگر قدیمی تلویزیون پسر اکبر عبدی است؟". Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 2. ^ "همه زندگیام با تلویزیون عجین شده". jamejamonline. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 3. ^ "فردی که به خاطر شباهتش به اکبر عبدی بازیگر شد". YJC. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
A quote from subject about a film. Fails WP:IS, WP:SIGCOV | 4. ^ "یادی از سریال نوستالژی و محبوب دهه 60". Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 5. ^ "خاطره بازی آقای بازیگر از بازی با شهلا ریاحی". tabnak. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Dup of #3 above | 6. ^ "فردی که به خاطر شباهتش به اکبر عبدی بازیگر شد". asriran. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 7. ^ ""پورمحمدی" پرداخت زیاد برای دعوت مهمانان را ممنوع کرد/برنامه تحویل سال شبکه یک موفقتر عمل کرد". yjc. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 8. ^ Jump up to:a b "بچههای فیلمها و سریالهای دهه ۶۰ کجا هستند؟ +تصاویر". cinemapress. 29 April 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Database page | 9. ^ "ليست كامل عوامل فيلم سفر جادويي (1369)". sourehcinema. |
Promo Interview, primary, fails WP:IS | 10. ^ "فردانیوز". fardanews. |
Database page | 11. ^ Dressage - Fajr Film Festival |
Brief promo for upcoming appearance | 12. ^ "یکی از مجریان نوروزی شبکه یک مشخص شد". jamejamonline. Retrieved 16 August 2023. |
Name mention related to another subject, fails WP:SIGCOV | 13. ^ "انيميشن "نوازنده" آماده پخش از تلويزيون شد". farsnews. |
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
04:29, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) NotAGenious ( talk) 08:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
It seems like the person's notability is in question, as the page is filled with press releases and other paid news. Additionally, there is a possibility that the author of the page may be a UPEditor (nature of their edits speaks by itself). DreamlarT ( talk) 12:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk)
14:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While it was initially asserted that the subject meets WP:NACTOR, this was called into question on the basis that sourcing was promotional in nature, and discussion of sources strongly favored deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 16:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR. Charlie ( talk) 16:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯
Raydann
(Talk)
04:25, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Promo interview | 1. "Naina Sarwar makes a mark in all South Indian languages". New Indian Express. 8 April 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Promo interview | 2. ^ "Naina is Destiny's Favourite Child". New Indian Express. 4 August 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Name listed, nothing meeting SIGCOV | 3. ^ "Kolanji movie review: Father-son bonding, lacks strong story". Deccan Chronicle. 27 July 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2023. |
Name listed, nothing meeting SIGCOV | 4. ^ "Eeswar's second film 'Suryapet Junction' completes the shoot!". The Times of India. 22 September 2022. |
Promo interview | 5. ^ "Naina Sarwar is set for her Telugu film debut". The Times of India. 23 August |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Yet another unsourced place-stub in Louisiana, this one is shown by the topos to be a siding just north of Lauderdale, not a settlement. Mangoe ( talk) 03:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:NFILM DonaldD23 talk to me 14:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While some potentially-usable coverage was identified, rebuttals regarding the quality of the cited sources were not refuted, delete has a slight numerical majority, and late momentum. signed, Rosguill talk 16:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This article discusses a rivalry between teams that are not traditional rivals and do not have enough coverage for a separate article. As a result, the article doesn't meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 03:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, since there is disagreement over notability here, a source analysis would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Kosovo women's international footballers. I was unable to find sufficient coverage of the subject, failing WP:GNG. The only thing I found that comes close is this 2023 interview. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 07:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as I am unable to find sufficient independent coverage of the footballer. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:42, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Student essay. The sources are to a high school textbook, community college course notes, and StackExchange. The content itself is little more than a compilation of the ledes of the relevant main articles, where they exist, and OR (even if obviously factually correct) where they don't. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NPROF. Only criterion subject could possibly pass is prestigious national awards, but I haven't been able to find much information on the prizes even in their native languages, and hence doubt it counts as prestigious. The sources in the article currently are both primary. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
I am not sure this person is notable. He is only apparently notable for his translation to Bulgarian/Slavic Macedonian of Daniel Moscopolites's dictionary (which can easily be covered in Daniel's article) and for his connection to the Miladinov brothers. There is not much else that I see that is relevant. I've been reading about the Aromanians for years and I had never seen this figure mentioned before. I also struggle to find English-language sources about him. I do not believe the article's writer has a firm grasp of our notability policy. They had previously created a separate article for Daniel's dictionary, which is the only thing that actually makes him notable in the first place. I would like the assessment of some other editors, I am not 100% sure myself what the outcome should be. Super Dromaeosaurus ( talk) 02:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is a rough consensus to Delete this article, given
User:Brooklynlegv's comments, it would be helpful to see a source analysis from editors that have the proper language background.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Автор на македонскиот превод, поп Стефан од Охрид, за кого буквално немаме никакви податоци ... (Author of the Macedonian translation, Pop Stefan from Ohrid, about whom we literally have no information ...). What you wrote also really only confirms that he's only notable for the translation. Authors mentioning him in passing does not indicate any notability. Your contribution is appreciated, but you should find a notable subject next time. I'd also advise you to not make unfounded accusations against other editors. Focus on the content. Thank you. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 22:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
The Lexicon Tetraglosson is a quadrilingual lexicon of Greek, Albanian, Vlach (Aromanian), and “Bulgarian” (Macedonian dialect of Ohrid) written by Daniel Moscopolites, an Aromanian priest from Moscopole. It is assumed that the Slavic version was translated from Greek by Stefan, an Ohrid priest of Aromanian descent (Nichev, 1997).- Mentions him in passing like most sources and also solely about his translation.
With a letter from 13 April 1793, the Moscopole Sakellarios and priest Daniil informed the Ohrid Sakellarios Pop Stefan (the progenitor of the current Ohrid family, Pop Stefanievi), that he was sending him the Greek dictionary with his student to translate it into Bulgarian within a week, because after Easter he wanted to send it to Venice for printing. At the same time, he asks him to listen to the speech of his parents, so that there is no mistake ...- Simply repeats what other and newer sources know him for - his translation. Koneski, Lunt and Friedman also mention him solely for that reason. StephenMacky1 ( talk) 14:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) (non-admin closure) Eternal Shadow Talk 04:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:VICTIM. Hundreds of firefighters have died in 9/11, not all of them merit a separate article. The conditions of his death don't seem to be all that special. At best I think we could redirect this to Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks#Deaths by jumping or falling, given that this page is getting 6k views a month and its creator already wrote about Suhr there. SparklyNights ( t) 01:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:26, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:CRIMINAL. This person is notable for only one event, that being the crime he was convicted for, and the crime in question ( sextortion on Facebook) also seems to be relatively WP:ROUTINE in the news. People get convicted for that basically every day, that doesn't make them notable. SparklyNights ( t) 00:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete Mach61 ( talk) 03:14, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER. Searches turned up absolutely nothing and provided sources are Spotify and apple music with one other source that does not lend much to notability as well. Seems to be almost borderline A7. Seawolf35 ( talk - email) 00:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Subject is a minor league footballer with a marginal professional career and no WP:SIGCOV apart from a couple transfer reports and some stats pages, therefore failing WP:GNG. [61] Angelo ( talk) 23:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:04, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Originally WP:PROD, the subject is a footballer with no professional career [62] and little to no coverage at all, therefore failing WP:GNG. [63] Angelo ( talk) 23:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
00:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)