The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I found a few pieces with a handful of mentions ( 1, 2, 3), but nothing significant. There are also trivial mentions in Japanese, which you can see by searching ジョシュア・スタンダー. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NCREATIVE. No in-depth coverage. Can't find anything about him online except an IMDB page. Clear friend a 💬 21:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Procedural Close. Nom is a sock. If someone wants to re-nom sooner than the typical N/C, feel free. Star Mississippi 01:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Article relies on one singular source to cover the whole article. Fails
WP:ONESOURCE and
WP:NOTABILITY. I put notability because without the citations we can't say for sure if this article is notable enough to be on Wikipedia alone. On
WP:ONESOURCE, "If an article is based on only one source, there may be copyright, original research, and notability concerns."
. Clearly, the article has more issues than the ones I presented here.
GoodHue291 (
talk)
21:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable person. While the sources provided all seem to be on the up-and-up, the overwhelming majority of them either are to websites that are now up for sale, return 404 errors, or flat-out can't be connected to. The sources that do properly function are all useless for notability - two are hits in catalogues for a book he wrote and the third is a non-sequitur. A search for sources brings up two Der Spiegel pieces about diplomatic document fraud and nothing else accessible or reliable. I will note that there is a BLP/N thread about this article (which is how I found it) but my putting it up for AfD is due to the sourcing woes and not because of the thread. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist for more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a notable topic, with most references to NPB.jp (the league website) and the Japan Professional Baseball Players Association. Lacking independent reliable sourced coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need a standalone WP article on each and every tribe that exists on this planet? Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit!
23:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 04:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:AUTHOR. Most of the sources are primary. LibStar ( talk) 19:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The three non-primary sources in this article contain only trivial coverage. A WP:BEFORE search for the event name in English and French turned up nothing usable. (In terms of precedents, there are currently no other articles on individual swing dance events, and I would expect to see one on the more significant International Lindy Hop Championships before this.) Sdkb talk 20:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Could any valid sources be added to the article? Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If you believe an editor is a sockpuppet, please file a reports at
WP:SPI. It's not a matter that can be resolved in a discussion about possibly deleting an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lyoness. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability with reliable sources being primarily about Lyoness. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyWorld. IgelRM ( talk) 21:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject's only claim to fame is that she was the first woman MLB drafted and thus, they lifted their ban on drafting women, both of which are already mentioned in Women in baseball and her dad's articles. While that may be the case, she never actually played in any MLB or even MiLB game unlike Kelsie Whitmore. Her time in high school and college are not worth mentioning as she was not a star athlete in either cases. The sources backing these claims are either dead links or only mention her briefly and I cannot find enough coverage for her in general to meet WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE anyway. The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 19:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field, and Schueler precipitated the MLB to change a rule about signing contracts for women), an enduring contribution to baseball. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 07:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro). Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Zero sources to meet the GNG. The source cited doesn't mention this station. The only others I could find list it as one among several stations [16] [17] and say nothing more. No significant coverage. Toadspike [Talk] 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still divided between Keep and Merge/Redirect. Rather than close as No Consensus, I'm relisting once more.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Characters of the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series. Thanks for identifying the specific Star Wars article that is the redirect target article. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Source analysis from reception: Of all sources that have been used, Gizmodo [25] is the only sigcov here. [26] Passing mention. [27] A trivia coverage from a listicle. [28] trivia coverage. [29] just a passing mention of Juhani being a lesbian character and can have lesbian relationship with trivia coverage [30] passing mention [31] listicle [32] just talked about her being created as a lesbian and the romance, a bit useful but this and Gizmodo isn't enough to pass the notability threshold. The rest of the sources that I didn't mention aren't reliable/situational and cannot help WP:GNG. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 10:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, if suggesting a Merge or Redirect, you must supply a target article at the same time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. And, as I said, specify a target article, by linking to the desired page, do not say things like "merge to the character list". Name the specific article. The closer probably doesn't know Star Wars and you don't want them guessing where content should be merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donkey Kong. I don't know if this IS the best Redirect target article but it seems to be the one most mentioned. Debate about a change can happen outside of this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am procedurally nominating this article for deletion, as it has been WP:BLAR'd multiple times despite clear opposition to it, which its detractors claim is pointless bureaucracy. I have no opinion on whether or not it should be kept or redirected yet, but I should note that this spin-off series has several mentions in reliable sources, which makes me think it should be put up to a real AfD discussion rather than hidden on a talk page. Despite technically being part of the Donkey Kong series, the "Vs. Mario" sub-series is long-running and its games have gotten large amounts of coverage, making it possibly undue to simply be merged. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it's not clear to me what the possible redirect target article is agreed upon here as several different "Donkey Kong" or "Mario" articles are mentioned in editors' opinions. There is agreement on the outcome of having this article Redirected, I just wish it was clearer what it was to be Redirected to. Once that is clear to a closer, this discussion can be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominators should offer deletion rationales that demonstrates a proper BEFORE has been done. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need a standalone WP article on each and every tribe that exists on this planet? Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit!
00:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. If you believe this article should be kept, please name the sources you believe establish GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. No inherent notability in the roles she held. LibStar ( talk) 19:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see an agreement that there is sufficient coverage in sources. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
this subject doesn't meet WP:GNG criteria and can't stand-alone ( WP:NLIST) as a musician ( WP:MUSIC and WP:BANDMEMBER). May this subject have to be redirect to List of JKT48 members page. Ariandi Lie Let's talk 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Digging around on this, there's nothing online that I could find but announcements of the game's development and content (mostly press release regurgiation), with zero reaction, review or critical response. The most notable aspect was a tournament being cancelled, but that was due to Yoshiyuki Sadamoto being tied to the game as a character designer and not the game itself. Game required a server connection that's since been shut down, with little commentary about that either. WP:BEFORE just shows no real indication of notability. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
16:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even though no support for deletion has arrived, both !votes say weak keep and the other commenter is only leaning keep. More discussion could help. Even if the article survives AfD, though, it will clearly need improvement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No extensive third-party coverage to meet GNG. LibStar ( talk) 16:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unconvinced that the subject of this article meets the notability guidelines for academics. The article subject is a teaching professor with limited research output. Their research has not made a significant impact in their scholarly field (they seem to publish introductions for popular presses, published reviews of their other work is critical). They have not recieved a highly prestigious academic award or honor at national/internationl level. They are not an elected member of a highly selective/prestigious society. The subject does not hold a distinguished professor position or appointment at a major institution, nor have they been named chair or equivalent. The subject has not held a highest-level administrative appointment. The person appears not to have made a signifcant impact outside of academia in their academic capacity, where they are quoted in publications it is usually promotional material for one of their porjects. The subject has not been editor/EiC of a major/well-established academic journal. Other contextual clues indicate that this page exists purely as a promotional platform for the subject. There is very little activity on this page other than IP editors vandalizing the page to introduce promotional content, and then other editors removing or clarifying these edits. The creator of this page has since been banned for their promotional activities. I mean to disrespect to the subject of this article, but I struggle to see how they meet the criteria or need for inclusion on Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong with trying to boost your platform and visibility as a junior academic, but I would suggest that this is much better accomplished through a personal website and social media channels. Having a cursory glance at the department the article subject belongs to, there are many far more senior scholars among his colleagues who are not similarly represented on this site. After spending significant time trying to improve this page, I doubt that with the available material it will rise to the level of inclusion. I welcome other editors' feedback and perspectives if I have been too harsh in my judgement. Boredintheevening ( talk) 15:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
It is obvious writers from one specific country may write in any language other than their national one. This article has no purpose of existing nor potential for expansion. Super Ψ Dro 21:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like it actually meets NORG. Coverage is all your typical SERIESA stuff. History is also a little suspicious TBH but that's mostly secondary to the routineness of coverage. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 15:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Australian cricket team in England in 1948. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Continuing the assault on the Anglo-Australian cricket fanfict. Full of cruft. Duplicated infoboxes. Similar articles have been deleted before, and a large amount are currently almost deleted here (deleted on 11 June 2024). Before voting for merge, remember a lot of these articles is already on the main biography ones. Pharaoh496 ( talk) 21:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Pharaoh496 ( talk) 21:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
"We have an article about every international match played on this tour; we have an article about the series; one about the Australian team playing the series; and one about the player. Any information that doesn't already belong in those three articles is, IMHO, too much detail to be covered in an encyclopedia: it is also essentially prosified statistics that we're not a database [...] While these articles are clearly a labor of love, at some point we need to recognize that not every incident in a month-long cricket tour is worth incorporating into Wikipedia. It may be the most famous example of an Ashes series, but there's been one approximately every two years for over a century, and it's hard to argue that similar articles could not be written about every player in the more recent ones, relying on online news coverage. Not every verifiable detail is encyclopedic. I'm inclined to believe the international matches, and the tour itself, deserve articles, but it's hard to justify coverage beyond that."Aside: I suggest purging the redirects from the list now, as there will most certainly be procedural back-and-forth that will muddy the waters. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 01:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Procedural comment 2 - the Keith Miller 1948 article is a featured article and a merge proposal less than two months ago reached a consensus to merge to the main article which has yet to be actioned. A merge discussion regarding the Ricky Ponting 2008 article was started in March 2024 and remains open. JP ( Talk) 17:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable Kenyan businessman. None of the coverage is WP:SIGCOV of him, it's all focused on the companies he works for or on his father, from whom notability cannot be WP:INHERITED. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 20:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article contains no notability claim under WP:NACADEMIC. Fails WP:GNG. Melmann 20:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Lack of Notability . च҉न҉्҉द҉्҉र҉ ҉व҉र҉्҉ध҉न҉ Message 20:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Family of Donald Trump#Barron Trump. Arguments in favor of retaining this article discussed the extent of the coverage that the subject has received, while arguments in favor of redirection largely focused on the nature of that coverage as relevant to the notability of the subject's father, rather than the subject himself. We do not have a policy that directly addresses this somewhat unusual dilemma. BLP1E may not apply on its face, however, that policy reflects that the community has supported the consideration of privacy concerns in deletion discussions. Here, there is a consensus to redirect the article for this reason. I have protected the redirect, consistent with our policy on repeatedly recreated articles. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 19:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Opening this discussion to coalesce discussions of redirecting this article back to its previous target. This is not an implicit support for redirection or deletion. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
the announcement this morning that he will be an at-large delegate- but it looks like he declined that opportunity shortly after so not a lot has changed. What we have are a collection of gossipy bio-snippets - reliably sourced, but a poor foundation for notability, and really not that interesting as an encyclopedia article. I don't see any benefit to having this as a standalone article when all the relevant information can have a perfectly good home at Family_of_Donald_Trump#Third_marriage. Barnards.tar.gz ( talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.Schazjmd (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[Meeting GNG]... is not a guarantee that a topic will be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article.Which is exactly what is being proposed here. Most notable material about Barron is already included in Family of Donald Trump#Third marriage. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ my edits) 05:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
teenage child of an extremely divisive living personis really not a good argument. This makes it seem like it is a WP:IDONTLIKEIT vote. Or
he is a private person, that too is not an argument based in our guides. The reason this keeps getting recreated is because he is notable. I hope the closer considers our N guidelines and policies. and NEXIST. Looks like roughly 6k people view the article daily, so they come to us for facts and we say??? NOPAGE? I hope the closer considers that the arguments seem to be trying to invalidate our notability guide like a form of jury nullification? I am traveling but will watch this AfD because I find this extremely puzzling. Lightburst ( talk) 07:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page, and seems obvious that this is one of those cases. -- JBL ( talk) 20:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
needed context- and there is no "needed" context for Barron's notability. The relevant context can be addressed through the typical editorial process through wikilinks to articles providing such context, and/or hatnotes to articles about Donald Trump or the political processes involved. However, that context is not needed for his notability as a person. It is important to remember that as an encyclopedia we do not determine what is notable on our own - we follow what reliable sources have and are likely to consider independently notable. And the current breadth of independent coverage of Barron is such that the reliable sources are deeming him independently notable - be it because they think he is not his father, or because he is notable on his own. As such, I vehemently oppose salting the article if it is redirected, because there is no reason it should be prevented from coming to exist naturally when reliable sources continue to report on him independently. As a final note in this comment, I'll refer to User:Carrite and others who have succinctly summarized the large amount of sources that report on Barron exclusively and not on his father's politics as reason for this subject's independent notability - and nobody has refuted those claims, even with the vast amount of !votes to redirect. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( User/ say hi!) 00:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
Editors can create a redirect if they so choose. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rugby BLP. The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was this transactional announcement and a couple sentences here. A potential redirect is List of Hull Kingston Rovers players. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Peace Mala. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence of notability..
The AfD held in 2009 was about a different Pam Evans, the article was turned into a redirect and then simply edited into a new page for a different Pam Evans in 2012. This would seem to have bypassed our normal new page patrols, which would, I think have draftified this. She is an author, but I can't find any articles about her which are independent from her publisher.-- Boynamedsue ( talk) 19:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:SUSTAINED notability has not been established with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 18:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject is apparently some sort of public school teacher/pianist. I could not find any indication of notability. BLP has had no non-circular references since 2006. The result of the previous AfD in 2007 was no consensus. I am unable to apply BLPPROD due to external links. XabqEfdg ( talk) 15:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG with the article's main source being primarily about Speedy Gonzales. List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters is partially incomplete and putting the info there would help to fill out that article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 14:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable advertising puffery term coined for public relations purposes; not used by reliable sources but in press releases and tourism websites Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for fighters (highest rating is #79 in the world) and all the sources are just reporting on his bouts. HeinzMaster ( talk) 13:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 14:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced after fifteen years Orange Mike | Talk 13:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 14:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The person does not meet the GNG/ANYBIO criteria. The sources are poor, and general notability is not demonstrated BoraVoro ( talk) 13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Hits the WP:SERIESA formula pretty exactly - of the 12 citations on this article, 6 are funding announcements, 1 is a short uncritical profile of the CEO, 1 is a venturebeat article with a comment from the CEO on something unrelated to the company, 1 is a marketing release for a company, and the other 3 just acknowledge that the company launched an Autodesk CAD plugin while talking about something else.
No coverage which goes deeper than stating that a particular business deal took place. BrigadierG ( talk) 12:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of significant coverage about the company. Let'srun ( talk) 12:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed coverage to meet the WP:NCORP. One possible WP:ATD is redirecting to LIN TV. Let'srun ( talk) 12:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced WP:FANCRUFT; WP:OR. Characters aleady included in their own article. -- wooden superman 12:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Jasrasar. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Resubmitted with no improvement. I feel this is a list too far, or perhaps WP:TOOSOON insofar as almost none of this list have articles. If and when they do I will reach a different view 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable. Otherwise, we'd have to scrap all of Category:Lists of minor planets.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 12:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Online book stores are not independent or reliable. The authors website is a primary source. Dan arndt ( talk) 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 10:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Not seeing anything that really satisfies WP:BIO. She lived, died, and left a lot of money to charity. Only one source, presumably in Swedish. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Emanuel o Rosa N: TU 7:81, KB; Bouppt 1897-691noo 1917-70-rII,SSA; Mosaiska förs:s i Sthlm donationsfonder ... (1924); J Sachs, Mitt livs sal-do, 1 (1949),s92o217;SMoK; Sthlms konserthus, Minnesskr vid invign den 7 april (1926), s 23; H Valentin, aa 1919, s 89.Now, I can't decode this, but presumably it refers to some sources that could be used. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 12:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article only cites unreliable sources, and there does not appear to be significant coverage of the coat of arms, if one even exists. toweli ( talk) 09:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication that this person is notable. Count Count ( talk) 08:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominator withdrew their previous objections [57]. — CactusWriter (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:SIGCOV. In the article, sources are greatly lacking, and the ones seems unreliable. Applicable to WP:INTERVIEW. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 20:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
CactusWriter
(talk)
22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopening discussion per a request made by the nom at my talk page. I had previously closed this as "keep" (as you can see
here).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2011 NEAFL season selectively. Owen× ☎ 14:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG: references are all database or WP:ROUTINE coverage by non-independent sources (e.g. the league, the clubs within it, and the online database where scores are entered. This also fails any reasonable 'pub test' of notability: it's a routine season article for a league which itself has no article and – as the reserves league for an already fairly minor competition – would also fail GNG. Aspirex ( talk) 07:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The extensive sourcing provided by Cunard and Prince of Erebor have resulted in a consensus to keep and clearly addressed the concerns of the nominator and two Delete !voters. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 08:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has only 1 source in 18 years of existence. Google News comes up with PR type stories or routine coverage of a staff member doing something. Nothing in-depth and third party to meet GNG. LibStar ( talk) 04:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The review notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店的英文全名頗長,叫GRAND HYATT BEIJING AT ORIENTAL PLAZA,在二○○一年十月開幕。 位置北京的心臟王府井。 七八棟高層大廈匯集在一起,蔚為奇觀。 飯店是中國最大的商務建築群東方廣場的一部分,旁邊有一棟一棟的高級公寓和辦公大樓。 從這裡走出去就是全北京最熱鬧的王府井大街,再遠一點可以步行到故宮和天安門去。 整間飯店,官方宣傳文字上說像傳統四合院的格局,其實是一個U字形的建築,分成東翼和西翼。 這次陪著金庸先生下榻,他住一六○一房,我住一○一六房,剛好是一頭一尾。"
From Google Translate: "The full English name of Grand Hyatt Beijing is quite long, called GRAND HYATT BEIJING AT ORIENTAL PLAZA. It opened in October 2001. Location Wangfujing, the heart of Beijing. Seven or eight high-rise buildings come together to form a spectacle. The hotel is part of Oriental Plaza, the largest business building complex in China, and is adjacent to high-end apartments and office buildings. Walking out from here is Wangfujing Street, the busiest street in Beijing. A little further away, you can walk to the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square. The entire hotel, according to the official promotional text, is shaped like a traditional courtyard house, but it is actually a U-shaped building, divided into an east wing and a west wing. This time I stayed with Mr. Jin Yong. He lived in room 1601 and I lived in room 1016, which happened to be one end of the room."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅酒店自去年底試行營業以來,至今已屆滿一年,住房率屢創新高,成為北京和中國飯店市場的新話題。位在北京王府井大街上,現是中國最大的商務建築群猁北京東方廣場內的東方君悅大酒店,是現代西方酒店和超級商場的綜合性產物。"
From Google Translate: "It has been one year since the Grand Hyatt Beijing Oriental opened on a trial basis at the end of last year. The occupancy rate has reached record highs and has become a new topic in Beijing and the Chinese hotel market. Located on Wangfujing Street in Beijing, it is now the largest business building complex in China and the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Beijing Oriental Plaza. It is a comprehensive product of modern Western hotels and super shopping malls."
The article notes: "走進東方君悅酒店,第一眼的感覺是它不太像凱悅集團酒店的格調,倒有點像香港的海逸酒店,最代表性的該是大廳內獨一無二的那顆水柱型風水球,配合精心的流水設計,創造東方式的流動平衡感。中國人那種講求「流水聚財」的觀念,在東方君悅表現很明顯。"
From Google Translate: "When you walk into the Grand Hyatt Oriental, your first impression is that it doesn’t quite resemble the style of a Hyatt hotel, but rather resembles the Harbor Plaza Hotel in Hong Kong. The most representative one is the unique water column-shaped Feng Shui ball in the lobby. Combined with the careful flowing water design, it creates an oriental flow and balance. The Chinese concept of "gathering wealth by flowing water" is very obvious in Grand Hyatt Oriental."
The review notes: "坐落於中國最大的商務建築群東方廣場之中,呈新月形、門外設有偌大噴泉的北京東方君悅大酒店給人非一般豪華感覺。... 由在亞洲居住了20 年的美國攝影師George Mitchell 所拍攝的黑白照片與陳設摩登的客房配合起來,不但沒有格格不入的感覺,好像筆者這種對老北京文化還未深切認識,但又充滿好奇的 遊人看起來,反而另有趣味。... 最喜歡吃的筆者在這數天裡,可謂大快朵頤。 設於飯店大廳中樓層,配備了一個開放式廚房的凱菲廳 (右下圖) 更是筆者的心頭愛。 "
From Google Translate: "Located in the Oriental Plaza, the largest business building complex in China, the Grand Hyatt Beijing Oriental Hotel, which is crescent-shaped and has a huge fountain outside the door, gives people an extraordinary sense of luxury. ... The black-and-white photos taken by George Mitchell, an American photographer who has lived in Asia for 20 years, match the modernly furnished guest rooms. Not only do they not feel out of place, it seems like the author, who has not yet deeply understood the culture of old Beijing, but is full of curiosity. From the perspective of tourists, it is actually something else interesting. ... The author, who loves to eat the most, had a great time in these few days. Located on the middle floor of the hotel lobby and equipped with an open kitchen, the Kaffi Hall (pictured below right) is my favorite."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店位於東長安街一號,位處北京中心地區,集時尚商舖與辦公室於一隅,旁邊是著名鋪與辦公室於一隅,旁邊是著名鋪的公屋大王府。酒店建成後才交由君悅管理,"
From Google Translate: "Grand Hyatt Beijing is located at No. 1 East Chang'an Street, in the central area of Beijing. It has fashionable shops and offices in one corner. Next to it are famous shops and offices in the same corner. Next to it is the famous public housing estate Grand Palace. After the hotel was completed, it was handed over to Grand Hyatt for management."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店自○一年開業以來,先後在多個國內外的酒店評選中奪魁,共獲頒三十項殊榮,踏入○六年僅兩個月,亦已獲頒五項殊榮 ,其中最新獲著名旅遊雜誌「亞洲目的地」(Destin Asian)評選為本年度北京最受歡迎飯店。 至於今年已獲得之獎項分別為:獲「胡潤百富———富豪之選」選為本年度富豪最喜愛的品牌酒店、「私家地理」選為五百家世界最佳酒店、「Conde Nast Traveler」(美國)選為亞洲五十家最佳飯店等。"
From Google Translate: "Since its opening in 2001, Grand Hyatt Beijing has won the first place in many domestic and foreign hotel selections, and has been awarded a total of 30 awards. In just two months since 2006, it has also been awarded five awards. , which was recently selected as the most popular hotel in Beijing this year by the famous travel magazine "Destin Asian". As for the awards received this year, they are: selected as this year's favorite brand hotel by the rich by "Hurun Report - Rich People's Choice", selected as one of the 500 best hotels in the world by "Private Geography", "Conde Nast Traveler" "(U.S.A.) was selected as one of Asia's 50 Best Hotels, etc."
The article notes: "香港特首林鄭月娥率兩百四十人觀禮團抵北京,出席中共建政七十周年活動。以港府官員、建制派成員、商界為主體的香港代表團,獲安排住東長安街的東方君悅大酒店,酒店保安嚴密。"
From Google Translate: "Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor led a viewing group of 240 people to Beijing to attend the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. The Hong Kong delegation, which is composed of Hong Kong government officials, members of the pro-establishment camp, and the business community, was arranged to stay at the Grand Hyatt Hotel on East Chang'an Street. The hotel has tight security."
The article notes: "在北京東方君悅大酒店舉辦簽書會上,小布為他親自撰寫的圖書「科比24」召開媒體見面會暨新書簽售活動。"
From Google Translate: "Lakers star Kobe Bryant embarked on a business trip to China on the 26th. In the evening, he held a book signing event at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Beijing. Bryant held a media meeting for his personally written book "Kobe Bryant 24". and book signing event."
The article notes: "今晚的北京東方君悅大酒店「高人林立」,中國男、女籃球隊教練員、隊員悉數現身出席姚明、葉莉的宴會。王治郅、易建聯、隋菲菲等人組成的「巨人陣」外加「中國高度」姚明,今晚的宴會有望成為中國歷史上平均海拔最高的「私人聚會」。"
From Google Translate: "Tonight, Beijing's Grand Hyatt Oriental Hotel is "full of distinguished people". The coaches and players of the Chinese men's and women's basketball teams all showed up to attend Yao Ming and Ye Li's banquet. The "Giant Formation" composed of Wang Zhizhi, Yi Jianlian, Sui Feifei and others plus "Chinese Height" Yao Ming, tonight's banquet is expected to become the "private party" with the highest average altitude in Chinese history."
The review notes: "The wow factor at this top-notch hotel—close to Tiananmen Square and the Forbidden City—comes from its huge glass facade and extraordinary lagoon-like swimming area: above its lush vegetation, waterfalls, and statues, a "virtual sky" ceiling imitates different weather patterns. "
The review notes: "From the lobby, the Grand Hyatt Beijing is another grand hotel with soaring ceilings and windows, polished marble floors, and an attentive staff. Two levels below the lobby, however, is one of the most unique and spectacular wonders ever seen in a hotel: an enormous grotto!"
The article notes: "Hyatt International Corp., which runs six hotels in China, is opening its first one in Beijing, complete with parking for 12,000 bicycles. About 200 of the 591 rooms at the Grand Hyatt Beijing have been opened; the rest are to open by April."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It was probably open to me to close this as no consensus or keep considering Cunard's sourcing (and subsequent pings to those who !voted delete). However, to produce a firmer consensus and allow for a re-evaluation of their position for the nominator and two delete !voters, as well as potential outside input also, relisting for another seven days. Without foreshadowing the future, this will be unlikely to need another 7 beyond this, and may even be able to be closed prior to this extra 7 if consensus becomes clearer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TISM. Owen× ☎ 14:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject; the most I've found is just "[...] with the news that the group’s new physical releases will be released through former Shock Records head David Williams’ David Roy Williams Entertainment under TISM’s Genre B. Goode imprint." ( 1). A redirect to TISM would make sense as an alternative to deletion. toweli ( talk) 05:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BAND. Also, There are not enough sources to determine notability.
The ref used in the article is irrelevant to the page's subject. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 05:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Neither being a county supervisor in a largely rural county of less than 100,000 people nor running for the US House of Representatives give automatic notability, and as far as I can tell she received only WP:ROTM local coverage throughout her career. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:NBOOK, the work of a non-notable author. Has been tagged as such since Feb 2023 without any improvement. Was de-prodded without establishing how it was notable. Dan arndt ( talk) 04:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Never held any office that makes them inherently pass NPOL and not enough sources to pass GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This page was first deleted in 2019 and despite being a WP:REFBOMB this new incarnation shows no additional evidence of notability under GNG or NBIO. Coverage is in school publications; WP:TRADES publications like local business journals and magazines (and without feature-length coverage that would permit the use of trade pubs to establish notability); self-published sources; or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs in longer lists of people. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 15:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Based on all the above, significant coverage exists and he meets notability guidelines. Lionsonny ( talk) 06:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The references presented by Lionsonny for GNG purposes have been disputed by two editors, and endorsed by another. Relisting for further analysis of these sources by other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, same comment as Daniel.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
is mostly copy and paste; not notable enough. most sources are notifications of the vulnerability under discussion Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 16:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
04:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted via A7. With thanks to Bbb23. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, no coverage to speak of. There's some confusing connection between this company and probably-notable HeroEngine, but I can't discern what it might be, and RS haven't covered it in any case. ~ A412 talk! 04:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 14:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Tone seems improved but there does not seem to be any ORGCRIT eligible sources since the previous AFD. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
01:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please assess new sources,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I cant find any mention of this school in reliable secondary sources, fails notability requirements for school ( WP:NSCHOOL). Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) SL93 ( talk) 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability per WP:AUTHOR. SL93 ( talk) 01:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Owen× ☎ 14:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Most likely fails WP:NLIST, consists of 60% red links. WP:NOTDIRECTORY also applies, and I didn't find WP:RS describing this list besides third-party directories. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. "There is a huge literature on such clubs"....it would help, of course, if examples were provided.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Once we discard the clearly canvassed votes, and give due weight to the version of source analysis that is supported by P&G, there is a rough consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 13:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This appears to fail WP:NFILM. This was a short film which was submitted to a 2013 Dailymotion contest connected with Annecy ("+ de courts"), but which did not win the judging ( [77]). I can't find any mention of it in the archived Annecy web site, nor can I find any substantial coverage online, just a lot of entries in film databases and an unusual amount of media on Commons (for now, at least: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by REDƎYE). Omphalographer ( talk) 00:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have several less experienced editors participating here and I urge them to review
Wikipedia:Notability (films) which is Wikipedia's guideline on how to judge notability regarding films and it doesn't include consideration by IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes. The nominator pointed out this page but I don't think some editors here are familiar with it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:hinnk
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
IMDb | WP:IMDB | ? | ✘ No | |
C2S Network | Press kit | ✘ No | ||
Dailymotion contest | ? | Just the title listed as a contest winner, although "More infos" section lists a different winner | ✘ No | |
AllMovie | ~ WP:ALLMUSIC, AllMovie ratings seem unreliable since they're included even on upcoming/lost films | Mostly facts imported from Wikidata, otherwise just the numerical rating | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ? | ? | ? Dead link, failed verification, Internet Archive page is also empty | ? Unknown |
Monkey Bread Tree | ~ | Offers coverage as a paid service | ✘ No | |
fiffest | ~ | Offers coverage as a paid service | ✘ No | |
Paris à contre-jour | Interview | ? | ? Dead link, failed verification | ✘ No |
Oniros Film Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Sea & Beach Film Festival | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Druk International Film Festival | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Cult Critic Movie Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Rome International Movie Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
In a short time, this is all I find; I don't have time to look further but all this (including comments above) seem really more than enough to me -- Streets4rage ( talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Supersonic888
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
IMDb | WP:IMDB | ✘ No | ||
C2S Network | Press kit | ✘ No | ||
Dailymotion contest | They are the organizers of the contest | It's clear: the film was chosen by the public, and the jury chose another one |
✔ Yes | |
AllMovie | ~ WP:ALLMUSIC, AllMovie ratings seem unreliable since they're included even on upcoming/lost films | Mostly facts imported from Wikidata, otherwise just the numerical rating | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ~ I was able to access the link a few days ago, but the page loads endlessly today. Maybe the site is under maintenance? I don't know how Internet Archive works, so I'm not validating it at this time. |
~ Partial | ||
Monkey Bread Tree | WP:AGF we should assume good faith: creators said they didn't pay for it |
✔ Yes | ||
fiffest | WP:AGF we should assume good faith: creators said they didn't pay for it |
✔ Yes | ||
Paris à contre-jour | Interview | link ok with Internet Archive, only video does not load and can be accessed here |
✘ No | |
Cult Critic | Interview | ✘ No | ||
Oniros Film Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Sea & Beach Film Festival | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Druk International Film Festival | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Cult Critic Movie Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Rome International Movie Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Dailymotion 120 Success Secrets | Emereo Publishing republishes content that mirrors Wikipedia content | Page 10 | ✘ No | |
World Book of Short Films | self-published book | Page 49 | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
On Google, I actually see only few people with these trophies.Yeah, that's because they charge extra for those. I'm not even kidding - for example, the rules for the Oniros Film Awards state that "Trophies are optional, are not included in the submission fee and all Winners may order the trophy by paying production costs and shipping costs". Omphalographer ( talk) 18:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. I found a few pieces with a handful of mentions ( 1, 2, 3), but nothing significant. There are also trivial mentions in Japanese, which you can see by searching ジョシュア・スタンダー. JTtheOG ( talk) 22:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 01:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NCREATIVE. No in-depth coverage. Can't find anything about him online except an IMDB page. Clear friend a 💬 21:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Procedural Close. Nom is a sock. If someone wants to re-nom sooner than the typical N/C, feel free. Star Mississippi 01:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Article relies on one singular source to cover the whole article. Fails
WP:ONESOURCE and
WP:NOTABILITY. I put notability because without the citations we can't say for sure if this article is notable enough to be on Wikipedia alone. On
WP:ONESOURCE, "If an article is based on only one source, there may be copyright, original research, and notability concerns."
. Clearly, the article has more issues than the ones I presented here.
GoodHue291 (
talk)
21:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable person. While the sources provided all seem to be on the up-and-up, the overwhelming majority of them either are to websites that are now up for sale, return 404 errors, or flat-out can't be connected to. The sources that do properly function are all useless for notability - two are hits in catalogues for a book he wrote and the third is a non-sequitur. A search for sources brings up two Der Spiegel pieces about diplomatic document fraud and nothing else accessible or reliable. I will note that there is a BLP/N thread about this article (which is how I found it) but my putting it up for AfD is due to the sourcing woes and not because of the thread. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
17:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist for more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This does not appear to be a notable topic, with most references to NPB.jp (the league website) and the Japan Professional Baseball Players Association. Lacking independent reliable sourced coverage. – Muboshgu ( talk) 19:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need a standalone WP article on each and every tribe that exists on this planet? Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit!
23:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:39, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. Contested PROD. JTtheOG ( talk) 17:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 04:33, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ARTIST and WP:AUTHOR. Most of the sources are primary. LibStar ( talk) 19:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
The three non-primary sources in this article contain only trivial coverage. A WP:BEFORE search for the event name in English and French turned up nothing usable. (In terms of precedents, there are currently no other articles on individual swing dance events, and I would expect to see one on the more significant International Lindy Hop Championships before this.) Sdkb talk 20:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Could any valid sources be added to the article? Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If you believe an editor is a sockpuppet, please file a reports at
WP:SPI. It's not a matter that can be resolved in a discussion about possibly deleting an article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Lyoness. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails notability with reliable sources being primarily about Lyoness. Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MyWorld. IgelRM ( talk) 21:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject's only claim to fame is that she was the first woman MLB drafted and thus, they lifted their ban on drafting women, both of which are already mentioned in Women in baseball and her dad's articles. While that may be the case, she never actually played in any MLB or even MiLB game unlike Kelsie Whitmore. Her time in high school and college are not worth mentioning as she was not a star athlete in either cases. The sources backing these claims are either dead links or only mention her briefly and I cannot find enough coverage for her in general to meet WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE anyway. The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 19:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field, and Schueler precipitated the MLB to change a rule about signing contracts for women), an enduring contribution to baseball. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 07:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Line 3 (Hanoi Metro). Liz Read! Talk! 21:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Zero sources to meet the GNG. The source cited doesn't mention this station. The only others I could find list it as one among several stations [16] [17] and say nothing more. No significant coverage. Toadspike [Talk] 15:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still divided between Keep and Merge/Redirect. Rather than close as No Consensus, I'm relisting once more.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Characters of the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic series. Thanks for identifying the specific Star Wars article that is the redirect target article. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Source analysis from reception: Of all sources that have been used, Gizmodo [25] is the only sigcov here. [26] Passing mention. [27] A trivia coverage from a listicle. [28] trivia coverage. [29] just a passing mention of Juhani being a lesbian character and can have lesbian relationship with trivia coverage [30] passing mention [31] listicle [32] just talked about her being created as a lesbian and the romance, a bit useful but this and Gizmodo isn't enough to pass the notability threshold. The rest of the sources that I didn't mention aren't reliable/situational and cannot help WP:GNG. 🍕 Boneless Pizza!🍕 ( 🔔) 10:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, if suggesting a Merge or Redirect, you must supply a target article at the same time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. And, as I said, specify a target article, by linking to the desired page, do not say things like "merge to the character list". Name the specific article. The closer probably doesn't know Star Wars and you don't want them guessing where content should be merged.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donkey Kong. I don't know if this IS the best Redirect target article but it seems to be the one most mentioned. Debate about a change can happen outside of this AFD. Liz Read! Talk! 21:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am procedurally nominating this article for deletion, as it has been WP:BLAR'd multiple times despite clear opposition to it, which its detractors claim is pointless bureaucracy. I have no opinion on whether or not it should be kept or redirected yet, but I should note that this spin-off series has several mentions in reliable sources, which makes me think it should be put up to a real AfD discussion rather than hidden on a talk page. Despite technically being part of the Donkey Kong series, the "Vs. Mario" sub-series is long-running and its games have gotten large amounts of coverage, making it possibly undue to simply be merged. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 23:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it's not clear to me what the possible redirect target article is agreed upon here as several different "Donkey Kong" or "Mario" articles are mentioned in editors' opinions. There is agreement on the outcome of having this article Redirected, I just wish it was clearer what it was to be Redirected to. Once that is clear to a closer, this discussion can be closed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominators should offer deletion rationales that demonstrates a proper BEFORE has been done. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Do we really need a standalone WP article on each and every tribe that exists on this planet? Fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Toadette
Edit!
00:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. If you believe this article should be kept, please name the sources you believe establish GNG is met.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
21:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. No inherent notability in the roles she held. LibStar ( talk) 19:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. I see an agreement that there is sufficient coverage in sources. (non-admin closure) Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 22:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
this subject doesn't meet WP:GNG criteria and can't stand-alone ( WP:NLIST) as a musician ( WP:MUSIC and WP:BANDMEMBER). May this subject have to be redirect to List of JKT48 members page. Ariandi Lie Let's talk 17:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Digging around on this, there's nothing online that I could find but announcements of the game's development and content (mostly press release regurgiation), with zero reaction, review or critical response. The most notable aspect was a tournament being cancelled, but that was due to Yoshiyuki Sadamoto being tied to the game as a character designer and not the game itself. Game required a server connection that's since been shut down, with little commentary about that either. WP:BEFORE just shows no real indication of notability. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
16:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even though no support for deletion has arrived, both !votes say weak keep and the other commenter is only leaning keep. More discussion could help. Even if the article survives AfD, though, it will clearly need improvement.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
No extensive third-party coverage to meet GNG. LibStar ( talk) 16:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unconvinced that the subject of this article meets the notability guidelines for academics. The article subject is a teaching professor with limited research output. Their research has not made a significant impact in their scholarly field (they seem to publish introductions for popular presses, published reviews of their other work is critical). They have not recieved a highly prestigious academic award or honor at national/internationl level. They are not an elected member of a highly selective/prestigious society. The subject does not hold a distinguished professor position or appointment at a major institution, nor have they been named chair or equivalent. The subject has not held a highest-level administrative appointment. The person appears not to have made a signifcant impact outside of academia in their academic capacity, where they are quoted in publications it is usually promotional material for one of their porjects. The subject has not been editor/EiC of a major/well-established academic journal. Other contextual clues indicate that this page exists purely as a promotional platform for the subject. There is very little activity on this page other than IP editors vandalizing the page to introduce promotional content, and then other editors removing or clarifying these edits. The creator of this page has since been banned for their promotional activities. I mean to disrespect to the subject of this article, but I struggle to see how they meet the criteria or need for inclusion on Wikipedia. There is nothing wrong with trying to boost your platform and visibility as a junior academic, but I would suggest that this is much better accomplished through a personal website and social media channels. Having a cursory glance at the department the article subject belongs to, there are many far more senior scholars among his colleagues who are not similarly represented on this site. After spending significant time trying to improve this page, I doubt that with the available material it will rise to the level of inclusion. I welcome other editors' feedback and perspectives if I have been too harsh in my judgement. Boredintheevening ( talk) 15:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
It is obvious writers from one specific country may write in any language other than their national one. This article has no purpose of existing nor potential for expansion. Super Ψ Dro 21:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't seem like it actually meets NORG. Coverage is all your typical SERIESA stuff. History is also a little suspicious TBH but that's mostly secondary to the routineness of coverage. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 15:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
21:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Australian cricket team in England in 1948. Liz Read! Talk! 21:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Continuing the assault on the Anglo-Australian cricket fanfict. Full of cruft. Duplicated infoboxes. Similar articles have been deleted before, and a large amount are currently almost deleted here (deleted on 11 June 2024). Before voting for merge, remember a lot of these articles is already on the main biography ones. Pharaoh496 ( talk) 21:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Pharaoh496 ( talk) 21:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
"We have an article about every international match played on this tour; we have an article about the series; one about the Australian team playing the series; and one about the player. Any information that doesn't already belong in those three articles is, IMHO, too much detail to be covered in an encyclopedia: it is also essentially prosified statistics that we're not a database [...] While these articles are clearly a labor of love, at some point we need to recognize that not every incident in a month-long cricket tour is worth incorporating into Wikipedia. It may be the most famous example of an Ashes series, but there's been one approximately every two years for over a century, and it's hard to argue that similar articles could not be written about every player in the more recent ones, relying on online news coverage. Not every verifiable detail is encyclopedic. I'm inclined to believe the international matches, and the tour itself, deserve articles, but it's hard to justify coverage beyond that."Aside: I suggest purging the redirects from the list now, as there will most certainly be procedural back-and-forth that will muddy the waters. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 01:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Procedural comment 2 - the Keith Miller 1948 article is a featured article and a merge proposal less than two months ago reached a consensus to merge to the main article which has yet to be actioned. A merge discussion regarding the Ricky Ponting 2008 article was started in March 2024 and remains open. JP ( Talk) 17:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable Kenyan businessman. None of the coverage is WP:SIGCOV of him, it's all focused on the companies he works for or on his father, from whom notability cannot be WP:INHERITED. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 20:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article contains no notability claim under WP:NACADEMIC. Fails WP:GNG. Melmann 20:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Lack of Notability . च҉न҉्҉द҉्҉र҉ ҉व҉र҉्҉ध҉न҉ Message 20:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Family of Donald Trump#Barron Trump. Arguments in favor of retaining this article discussed the extent of the coverage that the subject has received, while arguments in favor of redirection largely focused on the nature of that coverage as relevant to the notability of the subject's father, rather than the subject himself. We do not have a policy that directly addresses this somewhat unusual dilemma. BLP1E may not apply on its face, however, that policy reflects that the community has supported the consideration of privacy concerns in deletion discussions. Here, there is a consensus to redirect the article for this reason. I have protected the redirect, consistent with our policy on repeatedly recreated articles. Jake Wartenberg ( talk) 19:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Opening this discussion to coalesce discussions of redirecting this article back to its previous target. This is not an implicit support for redirection or deletion. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
the announcement this morning that he will be an at-large delegate- but it looks like he declined that opportunity shortly after so not a lot has changed. What we have are a collection of gossipy bio-snippets - reliably sourced, but a poor foundation for notability, and really not that interesting as an encyclopedia article. I don't see any benefit to having this as a standalone article when all the relevant information can have a perfectly good home at Family_of_Donald_Trump#Third_marriage. Barnards.tar.gz ( talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included.Schazjmd (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
[Meeting GNG]... is not a guarantee that a topic will be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article.Which is exactly what is being proposed here. Most notable material about Barron is already included in Family of Donald Trump#Third marriage. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ my edits) 05:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
teenage child of an extremely divisive living personis really not a good argument. This makes it seem like it is a WP:IDONTLIKEIT vote. Or
he is a private person, that too is not an argument based in our guides. The reason this keeps getting recreated is because he is notable. I hope the closer considers our N guidelines and policies. and NEXIST. Looks like roughly 6k people view the article daily, so they come to us for facts and we say??? NOPAGE? I hope the closer considers that the arguments seem to be trying to invalidate our notability guide like a form of jury nullification? I am traveling but will watch this AfD because I find this extremely puzzling. Lightburst ( talk) 07:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page, and seems obvious that this is one of those cases. -- JBL ( talk) 20:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
needed context- and there is no "needed" context for Barron's notability. The relevant context can be addressed through the typical editorial process through wikilinks to articles providing such context, and/or hatnotes to articles about Donald Trump or the political processes involved. However, that context is not needed for his notability as a person. It is important to remember that as an encyclopedia we do not determine what is notable on our own - we follow what reliable sources have and are likely to consider independently notable. And the current breadth of independent coverage of Barron is such that the reliable sources are deeming him independently notable - be it because they think he is not his father, or because he is notable on his own. As such, I vehemently oppose salting the article if it is redirected, because there is no reason it should be prevented from coming to exist naturally when reliable sources continue to report on him independently. As a final note in this comment, I'll refer to User:Carrite and others who have succinctly summarized the large amount of sources that report on Barron exclusively and not on his father's politics as reason for this subject's independent notability - and nobody has refuted those claims, even with the vast amount of !votes to redirect. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez ( User/ say hi!) 00:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
Editors can create a redirect if they so choose. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rugby BLP. The closest to WP:SIGCOV I found was this transactional announcement and a couple sentences here. A potential redirect is List of Hull Kingston Rovers players. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Peace Mala. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence of notability..
The AfD held in 2009 was about a different Pam Evans, the article was turned into a redirect and then simply edited into a new page for a different Pam Evans in 2012. This would seem to have bypassed our normal new page patrols, which would, I think have draftified this. She is an author, but I can't find any articles about her which are independent from her publisher.-- Boynamedsue ( talk) 19:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:SUSTAINED notability has not been established with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 18:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The subject is apparently some sort of public school teacher/pianist. I could not find any indication of notability. BLP has had no non-circular references since 2006. The result of the previous AfD in 2007 was no consensus. I am unable to apply BLPPROD due to external links. XabqEfdg ( talk) 15:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG with the article's main source being primarily about Speedy Gonzales. List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters is partially incomplete and putting the info there would help to fill out that article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 14:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable advertising puffery term coined for public relations purposes; not used by reliable sources but in press releases and tourism websites Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet notability for fighters (highest rating is #79 in the world) and all the sources are just reporting on his bouts. HeinzMaster ( talk) 13:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 14:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced after fifteen years Orange Mike | Talk 13:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 14:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The person does not meet the GNG/ANYBIO criteria. The sources are poor, and general notability is not demonstrated BoraVoro ( talk) 13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Hits the WP:SERIESA formula pretty exactly - of the 12 citations on this article, 6 are funding announcements, 1 is a short uncritical profile of the CEO, 1 is a venturebeat article with a comment from the CEO on something unrelated to the company, 1 is a marketing release for a company, and the other 3 just acknowledge that the company launched an Autodesk CAD plugin while talking about something else.
No coverage which goes deeper than stating that a particular business deal took place. BrigadierG ( talk) 12:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NCORP because of a lack of significant coverage about the company. Let'srun ( talk) 12:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject lacks the needed coverage to meet the WP:NCORP. One possible WP:ATD is redirecting to LIN TV. Let'srun ( talk) 12:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Unreferenced WP:FANCRUFT; WP:OR. Characters aleady included in their own article. -- wooden superman 12:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Jasrasar. Elli ( talk | contribs) 23:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Disputed draftification. Resubmitted with no improvement. I feel this is a list too far, or perhaps WP:TOOSOON insofar as almost none of this list have articles. If and when they do I will reach a different view 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable. Otherwise, we'd have to scrap all of Category:Lists of minor planets.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 12:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBOOK, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Online book stores are not independent or reliable. The authors website is a primary source. Dan arndt ( talk) 11:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. ltb d l ( talk) 10:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 12:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Not seeing anything that really satisfies WP:BIO. She lived, died, and left a lot of money to charity. Only one source, presumably in Swedish. Clarityfiend ( talk) 09:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Emanuel o Rosa N: TU 7:81, KB; Bouppt 1897-691noo 1917-70-rII,SSA; Mosaiska förs:s i Sthlm donationsfonder ... (1924); J Sachs, Mitt livs sal-do, 1 (1949),s92o217;SMoK; Sthlms konserthus, Minnesskr vid invign den 7 april (1926), s 23; H Valentin, aa 1919, s 89.Now, I can't decode this, but presumably it refers to some sources that could be used. Jähmefyysikko ( talk) 12:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The article only cites unreliable sources, and there does not appear to be significant coverage of the coat of arms, if one even exists. toweli ( talk) 09:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication that this person is notable. Count Count ( talk) 08:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nominator withdrew their previous objections [57]. — CactusWriter (talk) 20:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NMUSICIAN and WP:SIGCOV. In the article, sources are greatly lacking, and the ones seems unreliable. Applicable to WP:INTERVIEW. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 20:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
CactusWriter
(talk)
22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Reopening discussion per a request made by the nom at my talk page. I had previously closed this as "keep" (as you can see
here).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
07:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2011 NEAFL season selectively. Owen× ☎ 14:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG: references are all database or WP:ROUTINE coverage by non-independent sources (e.g. the league, the clubs within it, and the online database where scores are entered. This also fails any reasonable 'pub test' of notability: it's a routine season article for a league which itself has no article and – as the reserves league for an already fairly minor competition – would also fail GNG. Aspirex ( talk) 07:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. The extensive sourcing provided by Cunard and Prince of Erebor have resulted in a consensus to keep and clearly addressed the concerns of the nominator and two Delete !voters. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 08:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has only 1 source in 18 years of existence. Google News comes up with PR type stories or routine coverage of a staff member doing something. Nothing in-depth and third party to meet GNG. LibStar ( talk) 04:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The review notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店的英文全名頗長,叫GRAND HYATT BEIJING AT ORIENTAL PLAZA,在二○○一年十月開幕。 位置北京的心臟王府井。 七八棟高層大廈匯集在一起,蔚為奇觀。 飯店是中國最大的商務建築群東方廣場的一部分,旁邊有一棟一棟的高級公寓和辦公大樓。 從這裡走出去就是全北京最熱鬧的王府井大街,再遠一點可以步行到故宮和天安門去。 整間飯店,官方宣傳文字上說像傳統四合院的格局,其實是一個U字形的建築,分成東翼和西翼。 這次陪著金庸先生下榻,他住一六○一房,我住一○一六房,剛好是一頭一尾。"
From Google Translate: "The full English name of Grand Hyatt Beijing is quite long, called GRAND HYATT BEIJING AT ORIENTAL PLAZA. It opened in October 2001. Location Wangfujing, the heart of Beijing. Seven or eight high-rise buildings come together to form a spectacle. The hotel is part of Oriental Plaza, the largest business building complex in China, and is adjacent to high-end apartments and office buildings. Walking out from here is Wangfujing Street, the busiest street in Beijing. A little further away, you can walk to the Forbidden City and Tiananmen Square. The entire hotel, according to the official promotional text, is shaped like a traditional courtyard house, but it is actually a U-shaped building, divided into an east wing and a west wing. This time I stayed with Mr. Jin Yong. He lived in room 1601 and I lived in room 1016, which happened to be one end of the room."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅酒店自去年底試行營業以來,至今已屆滿一年,住房率屢創新高,成為北京和中國飯店市場的新話題。位在北京王府井大街上,現是中國最大的商務建築群猁北京東方廣場內的東方君悅大酒店,是現代西方酒店和超級商場的綜合性產物。"
From Google Translate: "It has been one year since the Grand Hyatt Beijing Oriental opened on a trial basis at the end of last year. The occupancy rate has reached record highs and has become a new topic in Beijing and the Chinese hotel market. Located on Wangfujing Street in Beijing, it is now the largest business building complex in China and the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Beijing Oriental Plaza. It is a comprehensive product of modern Western hotels and super shopping malls."
The article notes: "走進東方君悅酒店,第一眼的感覺是它不太像凱悅集團酒店的格調,倒有點像香港的海逸酒店,最代表性的該是大廳內獨一無二的那顆水柱型風水球,配合精心的流水設計,創造東方式的流動平衡感。中國人那種講求「流水聚財」的觀念,在東方君悅表現很明顯。"
From Google Translate: "When you walk into the Grand Hyatt Oriental, your first impression is that it doesn’t quite resemble the style of a Hyatt hotel, but rather resembles the Harbor Plaza Hotel in Hong Kong. The most representative one is the unique water column-shaped Feng Shui ball in the lobby. Combined with the careful flowing water design, it creates an oriental flow and balance. The Chinese concept of "gathering wealth by flowing water" is very obvious in Grand Hyatt Oriental."
The review notes: "坐落於中國最大的商務建築群東方廣場之中,呈新月形、門外設有偌大噴泉的北京東方君悅大酒店給人非一般豪華感覺。... 由在亞洲居住了20 年的美國攝影師George Mitchell 所拍攝的黑白照片與陳設摩登的客房配合起來,不但沒有格格不入的感覺,好像筆者這種對老北京文化還未深切認識,但又充滿好奇的 遊人看起來,反而另有趣味。... 最喜歡吃的筆者在這數天裡,可謂大快朵頤。 設於飯店大廳中樓層,配備了一個開放式廚房的凱菲廳 (右下圖) 更是筆者的心頭愛。 "
From Google Translate: "Located in the Oriental Plaza, the largest business building complex in China, the Grand Hyatt Beijing Oriental Hotel, which is crescent-shaped and has a huge fountain outside the door, gives people an extraordinary sense of luxury. ... The black-and-white photos taken by George Mitchell, an American photographer who has lived in Asia for 20 years, match the modernly furnished guest rooms. Not only do they not feel out of place, it seems like the author, who has not yet deeply understood the culture of old Beijing, but is full of curiosity. From the perspective of tourists, it is actually something else interesting. ... The author, who loves to eat the most, had a great time in these few days. Located on the middle floor of the hotel lobby and equipped with an open kitchen, the Kaffi Hall (pictured below right) is my favorite."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店位於東長安街一號,位處北京中心地區,集時尚商舖與辦公室於一隅,旁邊是著名鋪與辦公室於一隅,旁邊是著名鋪的公屋大王府。酒店建成後才交由君悅管理,"
From Google Translate: "Grand Hyatt Beijing is located at No. 1 East Chang'an Street, in the central area of Beijing. It has fashionable shops and offices in one corner. Next to it are famous shops and offices in the same corner. Next to it is the famous public housing estate Grand Palace. After the hotel was completed, it was handed over to Grand Hyatt for management."
The article notes: "北京東方君悅大酒店自○一年開業以來,先後在多個國內外的酒店評選中奪魁,共獲頒三十項殊榮,踏入○六年僅兩個月,亦已獲頒五項殊榮 ,其中最新獲著名旅遊雜誌「亞洲目的地」(Destin Asian)評選為本年度北京最受歡迎飯店。 至於今年已獲得之獎項分別為:獲「胡潤百富———富豪之選」選為本年度富豪最喜愛的品牌酒店、「私家地理」選為五百家世界最佳酒店、「Conde Nast Traveler」(美國)選為亞洲五十家最佳飯店等。"
From Google Translate: "Since its opening in 2001, Grand Hyatt Beijing has won the first place in many domestic and foreign hotel selections, and has been awarded a total of 30 awards. In just two months since 2006, it has also been awarded five awards. , which was recently selected as the most popular hotel in Beijing this year by the famous travel magazine "Destin Asian". As for the awards received this year, they are: selected as this year's favorite brand hotel by the rich by "Hurun Report - Rich People's Choice", selected as one of the 500 best hotels in the world by "Private Geography", "Conde Nast Traveler" "(U.S.A.) was selected as one of Asia's 50 Best Hotels, etc."
The article notes: "香港特首林鄭月娥率兩百四十人觀禮團抵北京,出席中共建政七十周年活動。以港府官員、建制派成員、商界為主體的香港代表團,獲安排住東長安街的東方君悅大酒店,酒店保安嚴密。"
From Google Translate: "Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor led a viewing group of 240 people to Beijing to attend the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. The Hong Kong delegation, which is composed of Hong Kong government officials, members of the pro-establishment camp, and the business community, was arranged to stay at the Grand Hyatt Hotel on East Chang'an Street. The hotel has tight security."
The article notes: "在北京東方君悅大酒店舉辦簽書會上,小布為他親自撰寫的圖書「科比24」召開媒體見面會暨新書簽售活動。"
From Google Translate: "Lakers star Kobe Bryant embarked on a business trip to China on the 26th. In the evening, he held a book signing event at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Beijing. Bryant held a media meeting for his personally written book "Kobe Bryant 24". and book signing event."
The article notes: "今晚的北京東方君悅大酒店「高人林立」,中國男、女籃球隊教練員、隊員悉數現身出席姚明、葉莉的宴會。王治郅、易建聯、隋菲菲等人組成的「巨人陣」外加「中國高度」姚明,今晚的宴會有望成為中國歷史上平均海拔最高的「私人聚會」。"
From Google Translate: "Tonight, Beijing's Grand Hyatt Oriental Hotel is "full of distinguished people". The coaches and players of the Chinese men's and women's basketball teams all showed up to attend Yao Ming and Ye Li's banquet. The "Giant Formation" composed of Wang Zhizhi, Yi Jianlian, Sui Feifei and others plus "Chinese Height" Yao Ming, tonight's banquet is expected to become the "private party" with the highest average altitude in Chinese history."
The review notes: "The wow factor at this top-notch hotel—close to Tiananmen Square and the Forbidden City—comes from its huge glass facade and extraordinary lagoon-like swimming area: above its lush vegetation, waterfalls, and statues, a "virtual sky" ceiling imitates different weather patterns. "
The review notes: "From the lobby, the Grand Hyatt Beijing is another grand hotel with soaring ceilings and windows, polished marble floors, and an attentive staff. Two levels below the lobby, however, is one of the most unique and spectacular wonders ever seen in a hotel: an enormous grotto!"
The article notes: "Hyatt International Corp., which runs six hotels in China, is opening its first one in Beijing, complete with parking for 12,000 bicycles. About 200 of the 591 rooms at the Grand Hyatt Beijing have been opened; the rest are to open by April."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It was probably open to me to close this as no consensus or keep considering Cunard's sourcing (and subsequent pings to those who !voted delete). However, to produce a firmer consensus and allow for a re-evaluation of their position for the nominator and two delete !voters, as well as potential outside input also, relisting for another seven days. Without foreshadowing the future, this will be unlikely to need another 7 beyond this, and may even be able to be closed prior to this extra 7 if consensus becomes clearer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
06:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to TISM. Owen× ☎ 14:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject; the most I've found is just "[...] with the news that the group’s new physical releases will be released through former Shock Records head David Williams’ David Roy Williams Entertainment under TISM’s Genre B. Goode imprint." ( 1). A redirect to TISM would make sense as an alternative to deletion. toweli ( talk) 05:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BAND. Also, There are not enough sources to determine notability.
The ref used in the article is irrelevant to the page's subject. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 05:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Neither being a county supervisor in a largely rural county of less than 100,000 people nor running for the US House of Representatives give automatic notability, and as far as I can tell she received only WP:ROTM local coverage throughout her career. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse ( talk) 04:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails the requirements of WP:NBOOK, the work of a non-notable author. Has been tagged as such since Feb 2023 without any improvement. Was de-prodded without establishing how it was notable. Dan arndt ( talk) 04:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Never held any office that makes them inherently pass NPOL and not enough sources to pass GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 20:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
This page was first deleted in 2019 and despite being a WP:REFBOMB this new incarnation shows no additional evidence of notability under GNG or NBIO. Coverage is in school publications; WP:TRADES publications like local business journals and magazines (and without feature-length coverage that would permit the use of trade pubs to establish notability); self-published sources; or WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs in longer lists of people. Dclemens1971 ( talk) 15:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Based on all the above, significant coverage exists and he meets notability guidelines. Lionsonny ( talk) 06:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The references presented by Lionsonny for GNG purposes have been disputed by two editors, and endorsed by another. Relisting for further analysis of these sources by other editors.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
03:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, same comment as Daniel.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
is mostly copy and paste; not notable enough. most sources are notifications of the vulnerability under discussion Maccore Henni user talk Respond using tb, please. 16:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
04:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted via A7. With thanks to Bbb23. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, no coverage to speak of. There's some confusing connection between this company and probably-notable HeroEngine, but I can't discern what it might be, and RS haven't covered it in any case. ~ A412 talk! 04:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 14:02, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Tone seems improved but there does not seem to be any ORGCRIT eligible sources since the previous AFD. Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
01:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Please assess new sources,
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
I cant find any mention of this school in reliable secondary sources, fails notability requirements for school ( WP:NSCHOOL). Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
02:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) SL93 ( talk) 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I found nothing that shows notability per WP:AUTHOR. SL93 ( talk) 01:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Owen× ☎ 14:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Most likely fails WP:NLIST, consists of 60% red links. WP:NOTDIRECTORY also applies, and I didn't find WP:RS describing this list besides third-party directories. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. "There is a huge literature on such clubs"....it would help, of course, if examples were provided.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Once we discard the clearly canvassed votes, and give due weight to the version of source analysis that is supported by P&G, there is a rough consensus to delete. Owen× ☎ 13:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This appears to fail WP:NFILM. This was a short film which was submitted to a 2013 Dailymotion contest connected with Annecy ("+ de courts"), but which did not win the judging ( [77]). I can't find any mention of it in the archived Annecy web site, nor can I find any substantial coverage online, just a lot of entries in film databases and an unusual amount of media on Commons (for now, at least: c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by REDƎYE). Omphalographer ( talk) 00:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have several less experienced editors participating here and I urge them to review
Wikipedia:Notability (films) which is Wikipedia's guideline on how to judge notability regarding films and it doesn't include consideration by IMDb or Rotten Tomatoes. The nominator pointed out this page but I don't think some editors here are familiar with it.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:hinnk
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
IMDb | WP:IMDB | ? | ✘ No | |
C2S Network | Press kit | ✘ No | ||
Dailymotion contest | ? | Just the title listed as a contest winner, although "More infos" section lists a different winner | ✘ No | |
AllMovie | ~ WP:ALLMUSIC, AllMovie ratings seem unreliable since they're included even on upcoming/lost films | Mostly facts imported from Wikidata, otherwise just the numerical rating | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ? | ? | ? Dead link, failed verification, Internet Archive page is also empty | ? Unknown |
Monkey Bread Tree | ~ | Offers coverage as a paid service | ✘ No | |
fiffest | ~ | Offers coverage as a paid service | ✘ No | |
Paris à contre-jour | Interview | ? | ? Dead link, failed verification | ✘ No |
Oniros Film Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Sea & Beach Film Festival | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Druk International Film Festival | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Cult Critic Movie Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
Rome International Movie Awards | ? | Just the title listed | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
In a short time, this is all I find; I don't have time to look further but all this (including comments above) seem really more than enough to me -- Streets4rage ( talk) 14:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Supersonic888
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
IMDb | WP:IMDB | ✘ No | ||
C2S Network | Press kit | ✘ No | ||
Dailymotion contest | They are the organizers of the contest | It's clear: the film was chosen by the public, and the jury chose another one |
✔ Yes | |
AllMovie | ~ WP:ALLMUSIC, AllMovie ratings seem unreliable since they're included even on upcoming/lost films | Mostly facts imported from Wikidata, otherwise just the numerical rating | ✘ No | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | ~ I was able to access the link a few days ago, but the page loads endlessly today. Maybe the site is under maintenance? I don't know how Internet Archive works, so I'm not validating it at this time. |
~ Partial | ||
Monkey Bread Tree | WP:AGF we should assume good faith: creators said they didn't pay for it |
✔ Yes | ||
fiffest | WP:AGF we should assume good faith: creators said they didn't pay for it |
✔ Yes | ||
Paris à contre-jour | Interview | link ok with Internet Archive, only video does not load and can be accessed here |
✘ No | |
Cult Critic | Interview | ✘ No | ||
Oniros Film Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Sea & Beach Film Festival | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Druk International Film Festival | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
World Film Carnival Singapore | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Cult Critic Movie Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Rome International Movie Awards | IMDB qualifying | ~ This is the official announcement of the winners, there is nothing more to say |
~ Partial | |
Dailymotion 120 Success Secrets | Emereo Publishing republishes content that mirrors Wikipedia content | Page 10 | ✘ No | |
World Book of Short Films | self-published book | Page 49 | ✘ No | |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
On Google, I actually see only few people with these trophies.Yeah, that's because they charge extra for those. I'm not even kidding - for example, the rules for the Oniros Film Awards state that "Trophies are optional, are not included in the submission fee and all Winners may order the trophy by paying production costs and shipping costs". Omphalographer ( talk) 18:38, 10 June 2024 (UTC)