I'm getting very, very tired of having every edit I contribute to this site reverted by someone who thinks it contains "unnecessary" detail. If you people are going to treat me with such disrespect, never again ask me to contribute money to this site. I will NOT help pay for a site whose senior members repeatedly disrespect me. Finance your site yourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Continental46 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Why exactly is it too much detail. The reason Auto closes the holo dectetor is alse a false statment. TheManTheyCallAdam ( talk) 14:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I know CC2 is still operating. The Gematsu news article/source clearly stated that its Montreal-based studio/branch of CC2 is shutting its doors by the end of July 2023. - Prince Silversaddle ( talk) 19:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm asking for your advice regarding this discussion you've been involved with. It has been two days with no further comments, and from the little experience I have with NORN, I don't expect any more editors to comment. One of the two editors involved in the dispute has apparently backed off, and the other is clearly acting in bad faith. Should I just remove the material again and reference the NORN discussion? Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 11:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
It was inevitable UltimateGamer9000 ( talk) 07:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Spacechem logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mystery Science Theater 3000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTOP.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gran Turismo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem, I noticed on the Bostock v. Clayton County Wikipedia page you do not recommend Gerald Bostock has his own page. I think he meets the notability standard as I have found a great deal of research on his story. Could you let me know why you reverted my edit? Thank you. Serenewilliams ( talk) 16:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
IT WAS NOT A GAME GUIDE SO STOP GrEgOrYiSnTaRoBoT ( talk) 12:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
If there's an issue with the sources then why don't you let me know or help out? I can't keep trying to genuinely improve the article and add sources when it's getting reverted by you for doubting sources.
Now it's back to the old version which is messier and doesn't even have one source. Sintlepond ( talk) 13:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
I have no opinion on whether this should be on the frontpage, but your rationale appears to be faulty. Presidential assent is when the bill became law; you must have conflated the content of the draft bill in March with what was on the statute book in March in coming to the conclusion that assent largely ‘maintain[s] the status quo’. ‘[A]dopted in March’ means approved by parliament in March, but the text approved did not enter law because Museveni returned it for reconsideration: see Article 91 of the Constitution of Uganda. Only now is the death penalty on the statute book.
Since I don’t care about the front page, I only ask that you should be more careful. But if you care about the frontpage, you may, if possible, wish to reopen the discussion, which appears to have been closed only on the basis of that faulty rationale. Docentation ( talk) 19:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
we happy few is a survival horror game and is shown in the articles 46.70.111.21 ( talk) 15:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
You said "in judgment" is standard, but the court uses "in the judgment". So I'm a little confused. Can you explain? Slovebz ( talk) 17:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
TheNewLayoutReallySucks ( talk) 02:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Do you have a Discord account? - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 20:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, the lead on Klete Keller was vandalized yet again :( not sure if anything can be done. 129.222.222.20 ( talk) 20:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem, just checking in. Do you have any thoughts regarding the proposed trim to the Workplace misconduct lawsuit subsection? As we discussed initially, all of the information is included in the breakaway article, so this is just a matter of keeping the main points on the page for reference, and leaving the details to the separate article. I look forward to your input. Sh-abkcomms ( talk) 22:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Exploration video games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
soibangla ( talk) 02:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to mention that I'm planning to nominate the page for GA. Is there anything you'd recommend improving before I submit? -- FlyingKangeroo ( talk) 22:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Don't revert it if it's wrong. Willbb234 14:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ghost Trick Phantom Detective screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
I think the picture might be useful to explain it. יאצקין52 ( talk) 18:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem. I would like to bring October 1 to FAC and saw that you're willing to mentor folks on film articles on the FAC mentor page. I've requested a peer review for the article and would be very grateful if you could take a look. Best, voorts ( talk/ contributions) 18:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
hey what should i cite? i have reddit post from the community manager and tweets from the official owlcat account about the subject as well. would those work? S silth ( talk) 12:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Masem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Squid Game: The Challenge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 01:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I have left a couple of discussion on Talk:List of best-selling video game franchises and wondering if you would like to get involved P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 ( talk) 22:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I think I read that statement wrong for E3. I do apologize. I also need to look at Wikipedia:Good faith. If I read the statement better, I probably would have said the statement better. Cwater1 ( talk) 14:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Convictions are nothing like what we talked about yesterday. When someone is convicted, there are clear consequences. Say the target article is a living voice actor and the crimes she committed carry a minimum eight-year prison sentence. Right there, we know we won't be hearing her in anything new (except maybe documentaries) until at least 2032. If the mandatory minimum is swift execution, that's the end of her career trajectory and everything else, definitively.
In Lack's case, she wasn't even part of it, consensually or otherwise. The settlement only affects descendants she never met and a company she hadn't heard of. The suit involved the relatively famous eponymous cells that affected her over 70 years ago, but there's absolutely nothing even suggesting their future use is or will be affected at all by whatever explicitly private agreement was reached the other day.
Anyway, I know I've been quite like a badger with you lately. I don't mean it in a malicious way, we've just run in the same circle so long that I can't help but notice you seem a bit "off" lately, relative to who I'm beginning to remember as "Classic Masem". Maybe it's a broader social problem or something entirely else pull-asides like these can't (and shouldn't try to) solve. But I'll lay off now and quietly hope you find your own way back toward those much clearer elucidations of the reasons you believe things are appropriate to blurb. Take care and have fun! InedibleHulk ( talk) 19:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I removed that sentence fragment based on the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Confusing_passage. I'd admit the discussion was shallow, but I saw one !vote for removal. If you disagree, feel free to contribute there. Cheers, Ca talk to me! 00:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
I never mentioned that Metaverse is fully connected to the US game market. The reason I included the Metaverse title was because it showed the growth of the industry and how tech companies are trying to break into the industry. I mentined mostly American tech companies. I can change the language I used there if you want, but it is not fair to ignore the metaverse topic, considering the large investments made in the US game market because of the metaverse. Ryan York ( talk) 21:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
It was written in a way to show how both used cloud gaming as tool for sales and revenue generation in the 9th gen. The remove of the first sentence makes it sounds as if just Microsoft has used cloud gaming while PlayStation has been doing it longer it just wasn't a main talking point or a compelling feature as it was a part of the stand-alone service PlayStation now GonzoBlue ( talk) 22:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Video games in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D video game.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem. I see that you reverted my list edits on Guitar Hero and Rock band, and while you didn't keep it on Guitar Hero, you did on Rock Band.
The way I see it, using a table means that there are a lot of "No" choices, and just a few with "Yes". For Guitar Hero, most of the "Yes" goes to four systems: PS2, PS3, Xbox 360, and Wii. Other platforms get four or less "Yes", and some only get one.
For Rock Band, again, the dominant platforms are: PS2, PS3, Xbox 360, and Wii. Everything else only shows up once or twice.
I get that the list format can take some time to get used to, but I think it's the best format for Rock Band. Guitar Hero has a little more variance in terms of platform availability, but a list format should work there, too. What do you think? LABcrabs ( talk) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
This seems excessive, but? [1]. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
hello,
I think that you've removed one of the additions on this page Blockchain , as you said it's a promotional addition, may I know the reason that you specify this addition as a promotional? Noha Mokhtar ( talk) 09:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Supergiant games logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia ( u t c m l ) 🔒 ALL IN 🧿 18:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, recently you reverted my cities skylines 2 info. How exactly is it too much detail? What, should I put them into subcategories? I thought Wikipedia was for, you know, providing information. And also, you said I didn't use "encyclopaedic writing", please tell me how this is not like, ok. Also you reverted the grammar improvements I made. Please elaborate why you did this?in addition you stated I used too many 1st party sources, I don't see how this is bad. SK55555 ( talk) 13:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
On 25 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article OSIRIS-REx, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Andrew🐉( talk) 09:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Loot box, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, how are you? I recently re-expanded all articles related to singer Madonna's first album with more relevant, previously missing information. I'd like to take "Borderline", my favorite song from said albun, to FA status. It would be my first FAC, so I'm looking for a mentor who can assist me :) If you're interested, please let me know Thanks in advance! Christian ( talk) 13:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Dear Masem, I recently made edits to the Atari 2600 page to reflect the continuation of the Atari 2600 series with the introduction of the 2600+ model in 2023. These edits were based on official sources, specifically from the Atari company itself and the developer's statements. The primary basis for this edit is the official announcement by Atari: "The legendary console that started it all - the grandfather of living room arcade gaming - is back and better than ever! With over 40 million units sold globally" This statement from Atari clearly indicates that the 2600+ is a continuation of the original Atari 2600 series. I understand the importance of maintaining the accuracy and integrity of Wikipedia. Therefore, I want to open this discussion to ensure that all perspectives are considered. The intention is not to mislead or provide false information but to accurately represent the evolution and continuation of the Atari 2600 series. Given that the 2600+ is described as an "updated version of the iconic Atari 2600," it seems fitting to consider it within the same lineage, much like how updated or "slim" variants of other consoles are still considered part of their respective series. I welcome feedback and insights from the community. If there are additional sources or perspectives that should be considered, please share them. Together, let's ensure that the Atari 2600 page accurately reflects the rich history and ongoing legacy of this iconic gaming console. Sources:
[1] https://discord.com/channels/866714430208213002/866715614687789056/1143534227820916897 [2] https://atari.com/products/atari-2600-plus?_pos=1&_fid=6a6b44687&_ss=c [3] https://forums.atariage.com/topic/354609-atariage-atari/ ItIsNERD ( talk) 15:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I hope you are doing well. It seems there is some discussion going on regarding adding blurbs to recent deaths, and another discussion to include non-human recent deaths. Do you think if it would be a good idea to start a formal discussion, or an RfC to change MOS of ITN entries with regards to the archive bot? The proposed changes in my head are not actually visible, and they would be inside the invisible html comments. That way, nothing visible is actually changed from what it is currently, but it would make it pretty straight forward to the bot to distinguish entries from events/news blurbs, recent deaths, and ongoing events. I am thinking adding invisible comments similar to:
*<!--OE Mar 09 2022--> [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]]
(OE for "ongoing event", or CE for "current event")*<!--RD--> <blurb if required> [[Dianne Feinstein]]
*<!--RD--> {{nowrap|[[M. S. Swaminathan]]}}
Kindly let me know what you think. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WFLA.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Any chance you will be able to dig in for a detailed file by file image review regarding Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#FUR_issues_at_Campbell's_Soup_Cans.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
My name is Laura and I work for Joanna Shields, Baroness Shields, a baron, businessperson, and former British politician. The page about her was recently tagged for COI and advert issues due to some poor edits made years ago. I posted here regarding my desire to address the substance of the tags with a re-write or heavy trims, to remove the promotional content. I was hoping you might be willing to chime in on the proposed trims and/or the suggestion for a rewrite. Let me know. Best regards.~~~~ LauTad89 ( talk) 14:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
On 7 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jon Fosse, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 19:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
I have been trying to get this on here for a good few weeks and that was probably the best the page had been written. There are other examples of YouTube videos being included as sources such as for YouTubers coryxkenshin markiplier and penguinz0. And secondly all of the videos included on the page have atleast over a million views. 2603:6000:B800:EB4:5D85:A65F:224D:E373 ( talk) 04:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
At which point does Andrew’s behavior begin to become less simply annoying and more genuinely disruptive? It’s a constant parade from him of misrepresentation, blatant disregard for guidelines (including the classic “but it’s got massive readership!!!”), bad faith arguments, and in general very few positive contributions to ITNC.
When would be appropriate to bring it to ANI or similar and try to get a TBAN? The Kip 17:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem,
There have been a handful of times that I have removed something saaying SCOTUS "certified" a case (where it granted certiorari), and it seems that you were the one who wrote that in each instance. Note that certification is a different procedure than certiorari, and I don't think grants of certiorari by SCOTUS are referred to as certification. If you can find some source saying that is correct terminology, I would be interested to see it. I would suggest instead "granted review", "agreed to hear", etc. SilverLocust 💬 18:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem. Do you think the first three logos (the red and yellow ones) in Beijing Guoan F.C.#Crest history are simple enough to be {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} for local use on Wikipedia? Otherwise, I can't see how they can be kept as non-free per WP:NFC#cite_note-4 or WP:NFG. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey alright so this is probably going to be the last attempt to get this mentioned on the page (Unless for example a article gets published on AV club or something.) There is a 2 articles that mentions the video I'm trying to put in (If it appears black you have to scroll down.) https://chattymatters.com/9761/previous-articles-videos/the-rise-of-the-video-essay/ and another one https://thesciencesurvey.com/arts-entertainment/2020/06/19/bored-try-watching-some-youtube-video-essays/ Both mention the creator of the video. Now I understand TV tropes is user generated however I have found examples of it being used on other pages ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_and_TV_programs_containing_corporal_punishment_scenes The TV tropes source is on the third reference link.) And the cult following it has received is also mentioned here ( https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/VindicatedByHistory/AnimatedFilms Click on "dreamworks animation." And it will show you it.) ( https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Trivia/SchaffrillasProductions When you find the words "Sleeper hit." It will mention the video.) The creator is mentioned on both IMDB and ironically av club ( https://www.avclub.com/tv/reviews/schaffrillas-productions-2015) ( https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15028658/) here are the memes it has received aswell https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Memes/Megamind 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 ( talk) 16:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Read this and it will give you a idea of what I tried to make the page like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Megamind&oldid=1180201171 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 ( talk) 21:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
On 29 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Roundtree, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I've posted an edit request over on Talk:Vimeo and see that you've typically responded to past requests about the article. If you're available, I'd welcome your feedback. Cheers! BINK Robin ( talk) 21:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
When you have a moment, could you head over to this article (it’s Dutch Survivor) and weigh in on the never-ending rigamarole with the colors on the voting table. Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
BangJan1999 22:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello there. I noticed that this IP appears to have been blocked indef. It appears to be unintentional as this page states, and I quote, “IP addresses should almost never be indefinitely blocked.”, especially when the IPs get reassigned to different users. Also, the IP[v6] address mentioned in the block reason (the one beginning with 2603:6000) is blocked 366 days, so the same length could also be applied to the former as well. - Genius Workbench 4622 14:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your valued contribution to the Five Nights at Freddy's (franchise) Article. ^w^ Keagen J. Cole ( talk) 19:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC) |
Hello. I noticed that in this edit in Pong you added the book source, but not the page numbers. Could you please add page number? Thank you! 深鸣 ( talk) 04:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem! I was looking through the FAC mentors list and apparently you are the only one with a specific interest in video games. I've just opened a PR for OneShot, currently a GA, to possibly make it my first FA. Any kind of help would be appreciated! Skyshifter talk 19:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Can you create a page for PUBG Global Championship. like this https://liquipedia.net/pubg/PUBG_Global_Championship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:56A0:8A3:43A:EF58:2328:DBC9:197A ( talk) 18:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. So you know, the UK & Ireland and Europe were all split Nindendo/Sega across secondary schools and colleges in late 80s/early 90s. There was rivalry way way way beyond US & Canada. -- Dock Mock ( talk) 23:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
On 6 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Norman Lear, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
I was surprised to find you were the main contributor behind Mandatory Fun. I've been using this article as a point of reference for my endeavors in writing about music, such as how to structure them and how to present the information. So thanks for that article! Panini! • 🥪 06:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hi, Masem. You recently reverted one of my edits on the page 2023 in video games. I added the New York Game Awards to the sub-section "Major awards", and you removed it on the grounds that they weren't significant enough. However, the New York Game Awards have been included on every "20xx in video games" page since 2013, and I see no reason why they should be excluded here. If you have no further argument, I'll soon be re-adding it. Thank you. ThanatosApprentice ( talk) 23:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Masem.
You recently reverted my edit where I used Forbes Contributor as a source. Would it be acceptable to repost the edit citing the youtuber's video as a source, as I am talking about findings he claims on the topic, not ascribing any validity to them. Domedusa ( talk) 17:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Masem. You recently reverted an edit I made last night on the Rock Band 3 Setlist page. I only added that one category on the table for the Rock Band 3 setlist because the export has been expired since 2020, and it helps newcomers who don't have the patience to sift through the list of downloadable content for the Rock Band series due to it having repeated entries and over 2000+ entries, especially since Rock Band's database on Rewind DLC has not been updated since 2020. It might not be necessary for people who already exported the setlist, but it is necessary for newcomers and latecomers who missed out on the export period, and want to see what songs are still available as DLC if they missed their chance with the export period or just got started on the series as of Rock Band 4. Would like to hear a reply on why you believe it is unnecessary. Thanks 2601:647:8100:B7B0:30F9:1FCE:CDF1:2BD7 ( talk) 20:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please clarify your reversion of my edit on Brain Age? Of course the source given was academic, but not secondary (at least, for the methodology and results of the study). Guidelines such as WP:SCHOLARSHIP advise "extreme caution" when citing primary sources, and to me it seems like directly citing a study that has (seemingly) not been discussed in any reliable secondary sources over the past decade is somewhat undue. Do you think my reasoning is off-base? ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs) 00:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Masem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hi! Thanks for adding Warcraft to the highest grossing franchise page but are sure the $17 billion video game revenue figure from The Motley Fool [2] isn't just a case of WP:CITOGENESIS? They probably got the figure from the earlier version of the page which had the inflated figures. I think we should use this source [3] since it almost predates the article itself. Timur9008 ( talk) 17:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
On 20 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of free Epic Games Store games. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Undeletion requested at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 January 24, with a plausible list of sources presented. Restoring and moving to draft as the original deleting admin.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. RoySmith (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am reaching out to you for to please reconsider the categories for winners of the D.I.C.E. Awards. I also like to address the following categories: Category:Award-winning video games, Category:BAFTA winners (video games), Category:Golden Joystick Award winners, Category:Game Developers Choice Award winners, Category:New York Game Award winners. The British Academy Game Awards winners is the big I have to point out. Now I understand how some of them may be irrelevant, and I may have gotten carried away with creating categories for each category. I am hoping we can find a reasonable compromise. MR.RockGamer17 ( talk) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
On 26 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ingenuity (helicopter), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 10:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seventh Amendment.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Do you have any thoughts regarding the claims that there's an existing consensus that's in use on many TV episode articles regarding the formatting of the short description? Unless anyone else chimes in or those claims are substantiated, I'm inclined to disregard them. Thanks for your help! DonIago ( talk) 16:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 21:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you have a link I can look at? Polygnotus ( talk) 16:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I see you reverted this edit [5] saying "too soon". Actually, I don't believe they will ever manage to distribute it outside Italy (4 years have passed), so maybe it's not "too soon"...
They only recovered 1% of the expenses on that movie, and it wasn't a homemade production, they had international stars acting... so I believe it could be listed, or maybe mentioned outside the list.
Please reply here because my IP will likely change.
-- 85.159.196.157 ( talk) 12:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Masem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
On 11 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 96th Academy Awards, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Smurrayinchester 15:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I asked a Wikipedia-mod to direct me to a Wikipedia-admin, so here I am. The topic is the article about the currently ongoing situation with the consultant company "Sweet Baby Inc".
The currently published Wikipedia-article creates the illusion that SBI is a victim and its critics are harassers (and all the other worst things that I don't wanna spell out). In discussion with mods, it became clear that they're not willing to include important facts and information due to the given reason that social media posts and similar are not accepted as sources on Wikipedia.
So, there's two issues with that: For one, when the entire traditional news media has decided to one-sidedly support SBI, ignoring what's actually happening and what happened to begin with, and the side of critics can only point to the original tweets and such of SBI employees and CEOs (where stuff like "I want to erase all white leads from gaming"), then this naturally leads to one-sided Wikipedia-article that certainly tells a story, just not one based in reality. For two, even if there's absolutely no way to incorporate social media posts as a source (which I personally find weird in a day and age where social media is where official news is being reported), then shouldn't the entire article be taken down for the time being? If there are not enough sources to give a complete picture of the situation, then rather than misrepresenting the situation, Wikipedia should go for the "wait and see"-approach, shouldn't it? The result as of now is that the people defending SBI are using Wikipedia's authority to even strengthen their position; I don't think Wikipedia exists to work as someone's ammunition in a strongly contended debate.
I hope you can bring about some positive change to the situation, either allowing sources that give a full picture of the situation OR removing the article entirely until reputable sources decide to include everything.
For full disclosure, I'm a member of the Steam group and all it does is list games with SBI's involvement. Without any judgement on the Steam page. As for WHY people join, it's to oppose "forced" diversity. This is in contrast to "natural" diversity. So the people criticizing SBI are not against diversity per se, as the currently sourced articles claim, but is only against the amateurish inclusion of ideology in video games and other media, resulting in worse games and movies. A popular example is an npc that you meet right after leaving the space ship in the beginning of Mass Effect Andromeda and the first thing this character tells you, a total stranger, "btw I'm trans". This is "forced" diversity. It adds nothing, it only makes the game feel less immersive, like someone put that in just to force it down people's throats. An example of "natural" diversity would be Olivier from "Trails in the Sky", who is bisexual and constantly hits on both female and male characters, but it never feels forced, because it's befitting his character as an easy-going, charming bard. So again, we are FOR diversity, but against forced diversity based on ideology. And nothing about the group has to do with altright, racism, bigotry or any of the terrible claims they make. Yes, there's a lot of unhinged idiots flinging around insults, too, but that's what happens when one side basically controls the entire industry and for years has pushed big game publishers to abide by their "consultation". And really, any bigger group (the Steam group alone has over 200k followers now) has a sizeable number of idiots. So please update the SBI entry to make clear that there is no organized harassment against the company going on, that it's a wider anti-DEI movement with "anti-forced diversity driven by ideology" at its core. Thx 2003:D8:8F3C:E000:B8F6:2724:3492:FC17 ( talk) 20:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
(I'm sure you're already aware of how it all works, just making sure every editor on the Talk:Sweet Baby Inc. page who hasn't received the alert gets an opportunity to see it; and based on the system log you haven't previously been alerted on this topic). ⇒ SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 00:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding state of Sweet Baby Inc. article. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
Sweet Baby Inc.".The discussion is about the topic
Sweet Baby Inc..
This notification was issued considering your recent contributions to the related talk page.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
-- Moon darker ( talk) 06:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings,
I am looking for a mentor to try to push the Wii Sports Resort article to FA status. Would you agree to help me ? Maxime12346 ( talk) 09:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Addendum : Please disregard my last inquiry, somee events will not allow to give the time required. Maxime12346 ( talk) 08:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
You said i need a source i wanted to add the source but i couldnt because the visual editor didnt let me and the source editor is hard Totallynotmwa ( talk) 16:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
https://vault.fbi.gov/gamergate
if you're talkinga bout evidence out in the open. why don't you mention SPJ Airplay? Why not mention Deep Freeze?
https://reason.com/2015/08/18/bomb-threat-disrupts-spj-airplay-gamer/
Why is it you ascribe a lot of this to "right wing" conspiricy theories when what's out in the open is different from what you assert? Let's say you're right. at what point do we disbelieve people saying the sky is blue because of how left or right leaning they are?
"
MisteOsoTruth ( talk) 11:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey Masem,
surely you're still trying your hardest to protect the SBI-article from displaying key information like who started with the harassment and such. That's sarcasm, ofc, because we both know you and the other admins have gone through no effort to change the article to actually reflect reality.
Maybe this latest development from today is at long last worthy of being added to the article: A BBC-journalist calling for a "final purge" against gamers in the context of the SBI-debate. The following website exists since 2014 and makes an effort to report only on facts, so maybe this is source enough: https://boundingintocomics.com/2024/03/26/bbc-gaming-presenter-jules-hardy-calls-for-current-sweet-baby-inc-discourse-to-end-with-a-final-purge-of-ideological-opponents-from-the-medium/
If this is yet again dismissed as "not reliable" and such, I guess I'll give up. Then I have to accept that Wikipedia exists in a different reality from the real one. Which is a bummer, as I've always trusted Wikipedia, but here I know it's in the wrong. Whatever. Pls take a look at the source, and if you dislike it, try to find one yourself. The call for a "final purge" by a BBC-journalist is too serious to be ignored. Have a good day. 2003:D8:8F17:F000:2A30:6B9F:C8DD:9679 ( talk) 22:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
On 29 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eli Noyes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 13:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Masem
I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.
Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna ( talk) 18:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
I put (stylized as NEO: The World Ends with You) is that okay? as that is the official way to stylize the name? StarStorm10 ( talk) 13:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I think we're getting trolled on that talk page. Instead of responding, I would start removing general questions like this one as disruptive spam that wastes the community's time. This IP in particular has posted at least 8 other similar threads since August 2023. There are a few other repeat offenders! My 2¢ -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 06:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Are you still interested on working on a stand-alone page for the British Royal family and the media? Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 17:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
On 9 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Peter Higgs, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Please don't undo the changes I've made on this page. It's a lot of work to make the page legally accurate, and cut out the fluff, if you read. If you have specific suggestions, please put them on the talk page. BarrySpinno ( talk) 12:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I saw this morning (my time) that you had raised an issue with me posting an O. J. Simpson blurb to ITN. I now have a chance to respond but the page was archived an hour ago. It's not that I was ignoring you but simply didn't know that you had raised an issue. WP:ITN/C is not on my watchlist ( WT:DYK is and that brings my watchlist beyond what's easily manageable) but you obviously can't know that. For future reference, if you'd like to discuss an ITN admin action, please give me a ping.
The way I deal with ITN is that every now and then, I go to the page and look from the bottom up whether there's something that requires action. Schwede 66 01:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Social game (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
If I just change the wording of the Super FX section, and just do the regular sourcing (I was going to originally, but the page for the sales of Star Fox on Argonaut Game's page got deleted, so I just used the Wikipedia article listing the best-selling SNES games to cover that), can it come back? The Miracle Girls ( talk) 22:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Masem, I'd like you to know that there's no hard feelings on my end. Loyalty-heart ( talk) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi there Masem. I'm taking this offline, as my intent is not to single you out at ITN. We all know it needs improvement. However, your ITN-related comments sometimes conflate what's codified at WP:ITN, versus your personal preferences for ITN, and the reality of what the community actually has decided to post at ITN. Particularly, fame and popularity fall under ITN's sui generis allowance. I assume you disagree with past postings like Betty White, Carrie Fisher and now OJ, but the fact is that an uninvolved admin decided there was consensus to post them.
My past replies to you were probably around the nuance that your comments sometimes come off that !voters and posters are somehow violating the existing WP:ITNRDBLURB, as opposed to framing it as an actual improvement you are seeking for ITN. I'd like to see "sui generis" give way to more objective criteria, but I haven't found a way to achieve consensus for it. Per WP:PROPOSAL:
Most commonly, a new policy or guideline documents existing practices, rather than proposing a change to what experienced editors already choose to do.
People seem to like their "free pass" to blurb "their" RD. — Bagumba ( talk) 06:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Archives
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm getting very, very tired of having every edit I contribute to this site reverted by someone who thinks it contains "unnecessary" detail. If you people are going to treat me with such disrespect, never again ask me to contribute money to this site. I will NOT help pay for a site whose senior members repeatedly disrespect me. Finance your site yourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Continental46 ( talk • contribs) 16:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Why exactly is it too much detail. The reason Auto closes the holo dectetor is alse a false statment. TheManTheyCallAdam ( talk) 14:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I know CC2 is still operating. The Gematsu news article/source clearly stated that its Montreal-based studio/branch of CC2 is shutting its doors by the end of July 2023. - Prince Silversaddle ( talk) 19:29, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm asking for your advice regarding this discussion you've been involved with. It has been two days with no further comments, and from the little experience I have with NORN, I don't expect any more editors to comment. One of the two editors involved in the dispute has apparently backed off, and the other is clearly acting in bad faith. Should I just remove the material again and reference the NORN discussion? Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 11:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
It was inevitable UltimateGamer9000 ( talk) 07:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Spacechem logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mystery Science Theater 3000, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WTOP.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gran Turismo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Top-chef-season-4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem, I noticed on the Bostock v. Clayton County Wikipedia page you do not recommend Gerald Bostock has his own page. I think he meets the notability standard as I have found a great deal of research on his story. Could you let me know why you reverted my edit? Thank you. Serenewilliams ( talk) 16:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
IT WAS NOT A GAME GUIDE SO STOP GrEgOrYiSnTaRoBoT ( talk) 12:14, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
If there's an issue with the sources then why don't you let me know or help out? I can't keep trying to genuinely improve the article and add sources when it's getting reverted by you for doubting sources.
Now it's back to the old version which is messier and doesn't even have one source. Sintlepond ( talk) 13:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
I have no opinion on whether this should be on the frontpage, but your rationale appears to be faulty. Presidential assent is when the bill became law; you must have conflated the content of the draft bill in March with what was on the statute book in March in coming to the conclusion that assent largely ‘maintain[s] the status quo’. ‘[A]dopted in March’ means approved by parliament in March, but the text approved did not enter law because Museveni returned it for reconsideration: see Article 91 of the Constitution of Uganda. Only now is the death penalty on the statute book.
Since I don’t care about the front page, I only ask that you should be more careful. But if you care about the frontpage, you may, if possible, wish to reopen the discussion, which appears to have been closed only on the basis of that faulty rationale. Docentation ( talk) 19:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
we happy few is a survival horror game and is shown in the articles 46.70.111.21 ( talk) 15:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
You said "in judgment" is standard, but the court uses "in the judgment". So I'm a little confused. Can you explain? Slovebz ( talk) 17:25, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
TheNewLayoutReallySucks ( talk) 02:22, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Do you have a Discord account? - Cukie Gherkin ( talk) 20:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, the lead on Klete Keller was vandalized yet again :( not sure if anything can be done. 129.222.222.20 ( talk) 20:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem, just checking in. Do you have any thoughts regarding the proposed trim to the Workplace misconduct lawsuit subsection? As we discussed initially, all of the information is included in the breakaway article, so this is just a matter of keeping the main points on the page for reference, and leaving the details to the separate article. I look forward to your input. Sh-abkcomms ( talk) 22:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Category:Exploration video games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 21:05, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
soibangla ( talk) 02:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to mention that I'm planning to nominate the page for GA. Is there anything you'd recommend improving before I submit? -- FlyingKangeroo ( talk) 22:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Don't revert it if it's wrong. Willbb234 14:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ghost Trick Phantom Detective screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
I think the picture might be useful to explain it. יאצקין52 ( talk) 18:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem. I would like to bring October 1 to FAC and saw that you're willing to mentor folks on film articles on the FAC mentor page. I've requested a peer review for the article and would be very grateful if you could take a look. Best, voorts ( talk/ contributions) 18:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
hey what should i cite? i have reddit post from the community manager and tweets from the official owlcat account about the subject as well. would those work? S silth ( talk) 12:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Masem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Squid Game: The Challenge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 01:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I have left a couple of discussion on Talk:List of best-selling video game franchises and wondering if you would like to get involved P+T Fan Of Lion King 🦁 ( talk) 22:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
I think I read that statement wrong for E3. I do apologize. I also need to look at Wikipedia:Good faith. If I read the statement better, I probably would have said the statement better. Cwater1 ( talk) 14:14, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Convictions are nothing like what we talked about yesterday. When someone is convicted, there are clear consequences. Say the target article is a living voice actor and the crimes she committed carry a minimum eight-year prison sentence. Right there, we know we won't be hearing her in anything new (except maybe documentaries) until at least 2032. If the mandatory minimum is swift execution, that's the end of her career trajectory and everything else, definitively.
In Lack's case, she wasn't even part of it, consensually or otherwise. The settlement only affects descendants she never met and a company she hadn't heard of. The suit involved the relatively famous eponymous cells that affected her over 70 years ago, but there's absolutely nothing even suggesting their future use is or will be affected at all by whatever explicitly private agreement was reached the other day.
Anyway, I know I've been quite like a badger with you lately. I don't mean it in a malicious way, we've just run in the same circle so long that I can't help but notice you seem a bit "off" lately, relative to who I'm beginning to remember as "Classic Masem". Maybe it's a broader social problem or something entirely else pull-asides like these can't (and shouldn't try to) solve. But I'll lay off now and quietly hope you find your own way back toward those much clearer elucidations of the reasons you believe things are appropriate to blurb. Take care and have fun! InedibleHulk ( talk) 19:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I removed that sentence fragment based on the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Confusing_passage. I'd admit the discussion was shallow, but I saw one !vote for removal. If you disagree, feel free to contribute there. Cheers, Ca talk to me! 00:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
I never mentioned that Metaverse is fully connected to the US game market. The reason I included the Metaverse title was because it showed the growth of the industry and how tech companies are trying to break into the industry. I mentined mostly American tech companies. I can change the language I used there if you want, but it is not fair to ignore the metaverse topic, considering the large investments made in the US game market because of the metaverse. Ryan York ( talk) 21:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
It was written in a way to show how both used cloud gaming as tool for sales and revenue generation in the 9th gen. The remove of the first sentence makes it sounds as if just Microsoft has used cloud gaming while PlayStation has been doing it longer it just wasn't a main talking point or a compelling feature as it was a part of the stand-alone service PlayStation now GonzoBlue ( talk) 22:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Video games in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D video game.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem. I see that you reverted my list edits on Guitar Hero and Rock band, and while you didn't keep it on Guitar Hero, you did on Rock Band.
The way I see it, using a table means that there are a lot of "No" choices, and just a few with "Yes". For Guitar Hero, most of the "Yes" goes to four systems: PS2, PS3, Xbox 360, and Wii. Other platforms get four or less "Yes", and some only get one.
For Rock Band, again, the dominant platforms are: PS2, PS3, Xbox 360, and Wii. Everything else only shows up once or twice.
I get that the list format can take some time to get used to, but I think it's the best format for Rock Band. Guitar Hero has a little more variance in terms of platform availability, but a list format should work there, too. What do you think? LABcrabs ( talk) 17:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
This seems excessive, but? [1]. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
hello,
I think that you've removed one of the additions on this page Blockchain , as you said it's a promotional addition, may I know the reason that you specify this addition as a promotional? Noha Mokhtar ( talk) 09:41, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Supergiant games logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia ( u t c m l ) 🔒 ALL IN 🧿 18:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC) |
Hey, recently you reverted my cities skylines 2 info. How exactly is it too much detail? What, should I put them into subcategories? I thought Wikipedia was for, you know, providing information. And also, you said I didn't use "encyclopaedic writing", please tell me how this is not like, ok. Also you reverted the grammar improvements I made. Please elaborate why you did this?in addition you stated I used too many 1st party sources, I don't see how this is bad. SK55555 ( talk) 13:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
On 25 September 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article OSIRIS-REx, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Andrew🐉( talk) 09:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Loot box, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:26, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, how are you? I recently re-expanded all articles related to singer Madonna's first album with more relevant, previously missing information. I'd like to take "Borderline", my favorite song from said albun, to FA status. It would be my first FAC, so I'm looking for a mentor who can assist me :) If you're interested, please let me know Thanks in advance! Christian ( talk) 13:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Dear Masem, I recently made edits to the Atari 2600 page to reflect the continuation of the Atari 2600 series with the introduction of the 2600+ model in 2023. These edits were based on official sources, specifically from the Atari company itself and the developer's statements. The primary basis for this edit is the official announcement by Atari: "The legendary console that started it all - the grandfather of living room arcade gaming - is back and better than ever! With over 40 million units sold globally" This statement from Atari clearly indicates that the 2600+ is a continuation of the original Atari 2600 series. I understand the importance of maintaining the accuracy and integrity of Wikipedia. Therefore, I want to open this discussion to ensure that all perspectives are considered. The intention is not to mislead or provide false information but to accurately represent the evolution and continuation of the Atari 2600 series. Given that the 2600+ is described as an "updated version of the iconic Atari 2600," it seems fitting to consider it within the same lineage, much like how updated or "slim" variants of other consoles are still considered part of their respective series. I welcome feedback and insights from the community. If there are additional sources or perspectives that should be considered, please share them. Together, let's ensure that the Atari 2600 page accurately reflects the rich history and ongoing legacy of this iconic gaming console. Sources:
[1] https://discord.com/channels/866714430208213002/866715614687789056/1143534227820916897 [2] https://atari.com/products/atari-2600-plus?_pos=1&_fid=6a6b44687&_ss=c [3] https://forums.atariage.com/topic/354609-atariage-atari/ ItIsNERD ( talk) 15:11, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I hope you are doing well. It seems there is some discussion going on regarding adding blurbs to recent deaths, and another discussion to include non-human recent deaths. Do you think if it would be a good idea to start a formal discussion, or an RfC to change MOS of ITN entries with regards to the archive bot? The proposed changes in my head are not actually visible, and they would be inside the invisible html comments. That way, nothing visible is actually changed from what it is currently, but it would make it pretty straight forward to the bot to distinguish entries from events/news blurbs, recent deaths, and ongoing events. I am thinking adding invisible comments similar to:
*<!--OE Mar 09 2022--> [[Russian invasion of Ukraine]]
(OE for "ongoing event", or CE for "current event")*<!--RD--> <blurb if required> [[Dianne Feinstein]]
*<!--RD--> {{nowrap|[[M. S. Swaminathan]]}}
Kindly let me know what you think. —usernamekiran (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moody v. NetChoice, LLC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WFLA.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Any chance you will be able to dig in for a detailed file by file image review regarding Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#FUR_issues_at_Campbell's_Soup_Cans.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
My name is Laura and I work for Joanna Shields, Baroness Shields, a baron, businessperson, and former British politician. The page about her was recently tagged for COI and advert issues due to some poor edits made years ago. I posted here regarding my desire to address the substance of the tags with a re-write or heavy trims, to remove the promotional content. I was hoping you might be willing to chime in on the proposed trims and/or the suggestion for a rewrite. Let me know. Best regards.~~~~ LauTad89 ( talk) 14:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
On 7 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jon Fosse, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede 66 19:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
I have been trying to get this on here for a good few weeks and that was probably the best the page had been written. There are other examples of YouTube videos being included as sources such as for YouTubers coryxkenshin markiplier and penguinz0. And secondly all of the videos included on the page have atleast over a million views. 2603:6000:B800:EB4:5D85:A65F:224D:E373 ( talk) 04:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
At which point does Andrew’s behavior begin to become less simply annoying and more genuinely disruptive? It’s a constant parade from him of misrepresentation, blatant disregard for guidelines (including the classic “but it’s got massive readership!!!”), bad faith arguments, and in general very few positive contributions to ITNC.
When would be appropriate to bring it to ANI or similar and try to get a TBAN? The Kip 17:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem,
I’m reaching out as part of a Cornell University academic study investigating the potential for user-facing tools to help improve discussion quality within Wikipedia discussion spaces (such as talk pages, noticeboards, etc.). We chose to reach out to you because you have been highly active on various discussion pages.
The study centers around a prototype tool, ConvoWizard, which is designed to warn Wikipedia editors when a discussion they are replying to is getting tense and at risk of derailing into personal attacks or incivility. More information about ConvoWizard and the study can be found at our research project page on meta-wiki.
If this sounds like it might be interesting to you, you can use this link to sign up and install ConvoWizard. Of course, if you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message.
If you have any questions or thoughts about the study, our team is happy to discuss! You may direct such comments to me or to my collaborator, Cristian_at_CornellNLP.
Thank you for your consideration.
--- Jonathan at CornellNLP ( talk) 17:41, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem,
There have been a handful of times that I have removed something saaying SCOTUS "certified" a case (where it granted certiorari), and it seems that you were the one who wrote that in each instance. Note that certification is a different procedure than certiorari, and I don't think grants of certiorari by SCOTUS are referred to as certification. If you can find some source saying that is correct terminology, I would be interested to see it. I would suggest instead "granted review", "agreed to hear", etc. SilverLocust 💬 18:07, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Masem. Do you think the first three logos (the red and yellow ones) in Beijing Guoan F.C.#Crest history are simple enough to be {{ PD-ineligible-USonly}} for local use on Wikipedia? Otherwise, I can't see how they can be kept as non-free per WP:NFC#cite_note-4 or WP:NFG. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey alright so this is probably going to be the last attempt to get this mentioned on the page (Unless for example a article gets published on AV club or something.) There is a 2 articles that mentions the video I'm trying to put in (If it appears black you have to scroll down.) https://chattymatters.com/9761/previous-articles-videos/the-rise-of-the-video-essay/ and another one https://thesciencesurvey.com/arts-entertainment/2020/06/19/bored-try-watching-some-youtube-video-essays/ Both mention the creator of the video. Now I understand TV tropes is user generated however I have found examples of it being used on other pages ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_and_TV_programs_containing_corporal_punishment_scenes The TV tropes source is on the third reference link.) And the cult following it has received is also mentioned here ( https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/VindicatedByHistory/AnimatedFilms Click on "dreamworks animation." And it will show you it.) ( https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Trivia/SchaffrillasProductions When you find the words "Sleeper hit." It will mention the video.) The creator is mentioned on both IMDB and ironically av club ( https://www.avclub.com/tv/reviews/schaffrillas-productions-2015) ( https://m.imdb.com/title/tt15028658/) here are the memes it has received aswell https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Memes/Megamind 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 ( talk) 16:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Read this and it will give you a idea of what I tried to make the page like https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Megamind&oldid=1180201171 2603:6000:B800:EB4:7DEA:F575:1ACB:A534 ( talk) 21:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
On 29 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard Roundtree, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I've posted an edit request over on Talk:Vimeo and see that you've typically responded to past requests about the article. If you're available, I'd welcome your feedback. Cheers! BINK Robin ( talk) 21:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
When you have a moment, could you head over to this article (it’s Dutch Survivor) and weigh in on the never-ending rigamarole with the colors on the voting table. Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
BangJan1999 22:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello there. I noticed that this IP appears to have been blocked indef. It appears to be unintentional as this page states, and I quote, “IP addresses should almost never be indefinitely blocked.”, especially when the IPs get reassigned to different users. Also, the IP[v6] address mentioned in the block reason (the one beginning with 2603:6000) is blocked 366 days, so the same length could also be applied to the former as well. - Genius Workbench 4622 14:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your valued contribution to the Five Nights at Freddy's (franchise) Article. ^w^ Keagen J. Cole ( talk) 19:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC) |
Hello. I noticed that in this edit in Pong you added the book source, but not the page numbers. Could you please add page number? Thank you! 深鸣 ( talk) 04:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Masem! I was looking through the FAC mentors list and apparently you are the only one with a specific interest in video games. I've just opened a PR for OneShot, currently a GA, to possibly make it my first FA. Any kind of help would be appreciated! Skyshifter talk 19:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Can you create a page for PUBG Global Championship. like this https://liquipedia.net/pubg/PUBG_Global_Championship — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:56A0:8A3:43A:EF58:2328:DBC9:197A ( talk) 18:32, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. So you know, the UK & Ireland and Europe were all split Nindendo/Sega across secondary schools and colleges in late 80s/early 90s. There was rivalry way way way beyond US & Canada. -- Dock Mock ( talk) 23:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
On 6 December 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Norman Lear, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
I was surprised to find you were the main contributor behind Mandatory Fun. I've been using this article as a point of reference for my endeavors in writing about music, such as how to structure them and how to present the information. So thanks for that article! Panini! • 🥪 06:11, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hi, Masem. You recently reverted one of my edits on the page 2023 in video games. I added the New York Game Awards to the sub-section "Major awards", and you removed it on the grounds that they weren't significant enough. However, the New York Game Awards have been included on every "20xx in video games" page since 2013, and I see no reason why they should be excluded here. If you have no further argument, I'll soon be re-adding it. Thank you. ThanatosApprentice ( talk) 23:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Masem.
You recently reverted my edit where I used Forbes Contributor as a source. Would it be acceptable to repost the edit citing the youtuber's video as a source, as I am talking about findings he claims on the topic, not ascribing any validity to them. Domedusa ( talk) 17:50, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Hey Masem. You recently reverted an edit I made last night on the Rock Band 3 Setlist page. I only added that one category on the table for the Rock Band 3 setlist because the export has been expired since 2020, and it helps newcomers who don't have the patience to sift through the list of downloadable content for the Rock Band series due to it having repeated entries and over 2000+ entries, especially since Rock Band's database on Rewind DLC has not been updated since 2020. It might not be necessary for people who already exported the setlist, but it is necessary for newcomers and latecomers who missed out on the export period, and want to see what songs are still available as DLC if they missed their chance with the export period or just got started on the series as of Rock Band 4. Would like to hear a reply on why you believe it is unnecessary. Thanks 2601:647:8100:B7B0:30F9:1FCE:CDF1:2BD7 ( talk) 20:14, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Could you please clarify your reversion of my edit on Brain Age? Of course the source given was academic, but not secondary (at least, for the methodology and results of the study). Guidelines such as WP:SCHOLARSHIP advise "extreme caution" when citing primary sources, and to me it seems like directly citing a study that has (seemingly) not been discussed in any reliable secondary sources over the past decade is somewhat undue. Do you think my reasoning is off-base? ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs) 00:29, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Masem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hi! Thanks for adding Warcraft to the highest grossing franchise page but are sure the $17 billion video game revenue figure from The Motley Fool [2] isn't just a case of WP:CITOGENESIS? They probably got the figure from the earlier version of the page which had the inflated figures. I think we should use this source [3] since it almost predates the article itself. Timur9008 ( talk) 17:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
On 20 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 03:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to List of free Epic Games Store games. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Undeletion requested at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 January 24, with a plausible list of sources presented. Restoring and moving to draft as the original deleting admin.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. RoySmith (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am reaching out to you for to please reconsider the categories for winners of the D.I.C.E. Awards. I also like to address the following categories: Category:Award-winning video games, Category:BAFTA winners (video games), Category:Golden Joystick Award winners, Category:Game Developers Choice Award winners, Category:New York Game Award winners. The British Academy Game Awards winners is the big I have to point out. Now I understand how some of them may be irrelevant, and I may have gotten carried away with creating categories for each category. I am hoping we can find a reasonable compromise. MR.RockGamer17 ( talk) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
On 26 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ingenuity (helicopter), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 10:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seventh Amendment.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 17:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Do you have any thoughts regarding the claims that there's an existing consensus that's in use on many TV episode articles regarding the formatting of the short description? Unless anyone else chimes in or those claims are substantiated, I'm inclined to disregard them. Thanks for your help! DonIago ( talk) 16:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 21:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Do you have a link I can look at? Polygnotus ( talk) 16:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I see you reverted this edit [5] saying "too soon". Actually, I don't believe they will ever manage to distribute it outside Italy (4 years have passed), so maybe it's not "too soon"...
They only recovered 1% of the expenses on that movie, and it wasn't a homemade production, they had international stars acting... so I believe it could be listed, or maybe mentioned outside the list.
Please reply here because my IP will likely change.
-- 85.159.196.157 ( talk) 12:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Masem! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC) |
On 11 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 96th Academy Awards, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Smurrayinchester 15:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
I asked a Wikipedia-mod to direct me to a Wikipedia-admin, so here I am. The topic is the article about the currently ongoing situation with the consultant company "Sweet Baby Inc".
The currently published Wikipedia-article creates the illusion that SBI is a victim and its critics are harassers (and all the other worst things that I don't wanna spell out). In discussion with mods, it became clear that they're not willing to include important facts and information due to the given reason that social media posts and similar are not accepted as sources on Wikipedia.
So, there's two issues with that: For one, when the entire traditional news media has decided to one-sidedly support SBI, ignoring what's actually happening and what happened to begin with, and the side of critics can only point to the original tweets and such of SBI employees and CEOs (where stuff like "I want to erase all white leads from gaming"), then this naturally leads to one-sided Wikipedia-article that certainly tells a story, just not one based in reality. For two, even if there's absolutely no way to incorporate social media posts as a source (which I personally find weird in a day and age where social media is where official news is being reported), then shouldn't the entire article be taken down for the time being? If there are not enough sources to give a complete picture of the situation, then rather than misrepresenting the situation, Wikipedia should go for the "wait and see"-approach, shouldn't it? The result as of now is that the people defending SBI are using Wikipedia's authority to even strengthen their position; I don't think Wikipedia exists to work as someone's ammunition in a strongly contended debate.
I hope you can bring about some positive change to the situation, either allowing sources that give a full picture of the situation OR removing the article entirely until reputable sources decide to include everything.
For full disclosure, I'm a member of the Steam group and all it does is list games with SBI's involvement. Without any judgement on the Steam page. As for WHY people join, it's to oppose "forced" diversity. This is in contrast to "natural" diversity. So the people criticizing SBI are not against diversity per se, as the currently sourced articles claim, but is only against the amateurish inclusion of ideology in video games and other media, resulting in worse games and movies. A popular example is an npc that you meet right after leaving the space ship in the beginning of Mass Effect Andromeda and the first thing this character tells you, a total stranger, "btw I'm trans". This is "forced" diversity. It adds nothing, it only makes the game feel less immersive, like someone put that in just to force it down people's throats. An example of "natural" diversity would be Olivier from "Trails in the Sky", who is bisexual and constantly hits on both female and male characters, but it never feels forced, because it's befitting his character as an easy-going, charming bard. So again, we are FOR diversity, but against forced diversity based on ideology. And nothing about the group has to do with altright, racism, bigotry or any of the terrible claims they make. Yes, there's a lot of unhinged idiots flinging around insults, too, but that's what happens when one side basically controls the entire industry and for years has pushed big game publishers to abide by their "consultation". And really, any bigger group (the Steam group alone has over 200k followers now) has a sizeable number of idiots. So please update the SBI entry to make clear that there is no organized harassment against the company going on, that it's a wider anti-DEI movement with "anti-forced diversity driven by ideology" at its core. Thx 2003:D8:8F3C:E000:B8F6:2724:3492:FC17 ( talk) 20:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
(I'm sure you're already aware of how it all works, just making sure every editor on the Talk:Sweet Baby Inc. page who hasn't received the alert gets an opportunity to see it; and based on the system log you haven't previously been alerted on this topic). ⇒ SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 00:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding state of Sweet Baby Inc. article. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
Sweet Baby Inc.".The discussion is about the topic
Sweet Baby Inc..
This notification was issued considering your recent contributions to the related talk page.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
-- Moon darker ( talk) 06:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Greetings,
I am looking for a mentor to try to push the Wii Sports Resort article to FA status. Would you agree to help me ? Maxime12346 ( talk) 09:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Addendum : Please disregard my last inquiry, somee events will not allow to give the time required. Maxime12346 ( talk) 08:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
You said i need a source i wanted to add the source but i couldnt because the visual editor didnt let me and the source editor is hard Totallynotmwa ( talk) 16:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
https://vault.fbi.gov/gamergate
if you're talkinga bout evidence out in the open. why don't you mention SPJ Airplay? Why not mention Deep Freeze?
https://reason.com/2015/08/18/bomb-threat-disrupts-spj-airplay-gamer/
Why is it you ascribe a lot of this to "right wing" conspiricy theories when what's out in the open is different from what you assert? Let's say you're right. at what point do we disbelieve people saying the sky is blue because of how left or right leaning they are?
"
MisteOsoTruth ( talk) 11:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hey Masem,
surely you're still trying your hardest to protect the SBI-article from displaying key information like who started with the harassment and such. That's sarcasm, ofc, because we both know you and the other admins have gone through no effort to change the article to actually reflect reality.
Maybe this latest development from today is at long last worthy of being added to the article: A BBC-journalist calling for a "final purge" against gamers in the context of the SBI-debate. The following website exists since 2014 and makes an effort to report only on facts, so maybe this is source enough: https://boundingintocomics.com/2024/03/26/bbc-gaming-presenter-jules-hardy-calls-for-current-sweet-baby-inc-discourse-to-end-with-a-final-purge-of-ideological-opponents-from-the-medium/
If this is yet again dismissed as "not reliable" and such, I guess I'll give up. Then I have to accept that Wikipedia exists in a different reality from the real one. Which is a bummer, as I've always trusted Wikipedia, but here I know it's in the wrong. Whatever. Pls take a look at the source, and if you dislike it, try to find one yourself. The call for a "final purge" by a BBC-journalist is too serious to be ignored. Have a good day. 2003:D8:8F17:F000:2A30:6B9F:C8DD:9679 ( talk) 22:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
On 29 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eli Noyes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 13:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Masem
I am reaching out to you because of your previous participation in one of the discussions regarding the reliability and neutrality of HuffPost/Pink News/ProPublica as sources used on Wikipedia.
Currently, there is an ongoing issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Wikipedia article. The section appears to be biased and lacks a balanced representation of the foundation's activities, as it primarily focuses on a single controversial donation while neglecting to mention the organization's numerous other significant contributions to various causes.
I would like to invite you to participate in the discussion on the BLP Noticeboard to address the concerns surrounding the section's neutrality and explore ways to improve its content. Llama Tierna ( talk) 18:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
I put (stylized as NEO: The World Ends with You) is that okay? as that is the official way to stylize the name? StarStorm10 ( talk) 13:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I think we're getting trolled on that talk page. Instead of responding, I would start removing general questions like this one as disruptive spam that wastes the community's time. This IP in particular has posted at least 8 other similar threads since August 2023. There are a few other repeat offenders! My 2¢ -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 06:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Are you still interested on working on a stand-alone page for the British Royal family and the media? Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 17:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
On 9 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Peter Higgs, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Ingenuity ( talk • contribs) 20:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Please don't undo the changes I've made on this page. It's a lot of work to make the page legally accurate, and cut out the fluff, if you read. If you have specific suggestions, please put them on the talk page. BarrySpinno ( talk) 12:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
I saw this morning (my time) that you had raised an issue with me posting an O. J. Simpson blurb to ITN. I now have a chance to respond but the page was archived an hour ago. It's not that I was ignoring you but simply didn't know that you had raised an issue. WP:ITN/C is not on my watchlist ( WT:DYK is and that brings my watchlist beyond what's easily manageable) but you obviously can't know that. For future reference, if you'd like to discuss an ITN admin action, please give me a ping.
The way I deal with ITN is that every now and then, I go to the page and look from the bottom up whether there's something that requires action. Schwede 66 01:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Social game (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 13:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
If I just change the wording of the Super FX section, and just do the regular sourcing (I was going to originally, but the page for the sales of Star Fox on Argonaut Game's page got deleted, so I just used the Wikipedia article listing the best-selling SNES games to cover that), can it come back? The Miracle Girls ( talk) 22:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Masem, I'd like you to know that there's no hard feelings on my end. Loyalty-heart ( talk) 16:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi there Masem. I'm taking this offline, as my intent is not to single you out at ITN. We all know it needs improvement. However, your ITN-related comments sometimes conflate what's codified at WP:ITN, versus your personal preferences for ITN, and the reality of what the community actually has decided to post at ITN. Particularly, fame and popularity fall under ITN's sui generis allowance. I assume you disagree with past postings like Betty White, Carrie Fisher and now OJ, but the fact is that an uninvolved admin decided there was consensus to post them.
My past replies to you were probably around the nuance that your comments sometimes come off that !voters and posters are somehow violating the existing WP:ITNRDBLURB, as opposed to framing it as an actual improvement you are seeking for ITN. I'd like to see "sui generis" give way to more objective criteria, but I haven't found a way to achieve consensus for it. Per WP:PROPOSAL:
Most commonly, a new policy or guideline documents existing practices, rather than proposing a change to what experienced editors already choose to do.
People seem to like their "free pass" to blurb "their" RD. — Bagumba ( talk) 06:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)