Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. While on first glance there is significant coverage, all of it is press release, churnalism, routine announcements, or otherwise sources that fails WP:ORGCRIT. Even Forbes was generated by the company itself and the rest look like a well-run press campaign. Absent in-depth independent coverage, I do not see how this meets notability guidelines. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not belong in an encyclopedia. It appears that what is described in the article does not correlate one-to-one with the title of the article. The article describes "stability" of leave-one-out error, whereas the title of the article is leave-one-out error. The title could be changed appropriately, to "stability of leave-one-out error", but then it would be even more clear that an article like this does not belong in an encyclopedia. Looking at WP:NOT, Wikipedia is just not supposed to be a textbook or a scientific journal, where this article might belong. It is too technical, it does not sufficiently define the math terms, and is overall unreadable. Even for someone who is relatively familiar with this method, this article just does not convey anything meaningful. A reader who wants to learn about this in such detail will not look in an encyclopedia, they will look in research papers and textbooks on the method. Manyyassin ( talk) 16:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. The only thing I found was this webpage (not article) on The Salt Lake Tribune's website. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties. toweli ( talk) 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Violates many versions of WP:NOT. I could not find any mention of their name on the listed source, as well as being unable to find any RS regarding Ghosh and their campaign. A candidate for a political office is not notable in of itself and their business career has not provided any sources. Grahaml35 ( talk) 15:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No apparent signs of notability for this brand of safety footwear. The only Google results are for outlets that sell the brand, and the only news results discuss the relaunch of the brand by International Brands Group after the original manufacturer went out of business. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 14:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Only one source is independent and significant. User:Namiba 14:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. All provided sources (except perhaps NZHerald, which is directly about subject's work) are not WP:SIGCOV. Instances of WP:SYNTH and failed verification of inline sourced claims. Melmann 14:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability- in addition to the sources that describe her activities in greater depth, in total RS show she's a prominent member of multiple conversion therapy groups who's been publicly advocating in multiple countries and court systems for years.
Most of the sources are either regional publication (mainly the Otago Daily Times), university newspapers (Critic Te Arohi) and primary-sourced YouTube video. I only see two national sources. The first I can't access, and the second is a mention of a cannabis museum but does not go into detail. ― Panamitsu (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet any of the criteria for WP:ARTIST. Only 1 article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 14:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Beyond lacking a title and release date, none of the available coverage is in significant depth or particularly independent, as it comprises newspapers quoting the artists directly for vague details about their upcoming collaborative project, and one article about a concert where the artists played together (but which does not mention any upcoming album). Searching online for the artists' names only turns up coverage about prior work together. As the advertised album does not list either artist as the primary artist, and neither of their biography articles discuss the upcoming project, so the usual album ATD of redirecting to the recording artist does not apply. signed, Rosguill talk 14:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong Keep : The article's subject is notable. Thanthi one is an airing new TV channel from Daily Thanthi Group in Tamil Nadu. They already have one channel Thanthi TV. strong source from (www.dailythanthi.com, www.afaqs.com, www.medianews4u.com, cinema.vikatan.com). It deserves to be kept. in future can we add more source. This is not TV guide, only added programs broadcast by Thanthi One. Official Web ( Thanthi One, Thanthi One's channel on YouTube)-- P.Karthik.95 ( talk) 15:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The BFI source which would have been useful returns a 404 error. The other from IMDB is unreliable. Searches reveal very little, certainly nothing that adds to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Based on Talk:Richard N. Holzapfel#WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, it appears that the subject of the article is requesting deletion of the article. It doesn't appear from the current article text that he qualifies as a public figure so WP:BIODELETE could apply. FyzixFighter ( talk) 13:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and very short (4 entries) list without much context. I don't think there's much reason for it to exist as its own article, as opposed to those events being described in the Penghu article. toweli ( talk) 13:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 13:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient number of references for the significance of the article Welcome to Pandora ( talk) 11:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The current sources do not provide the required coverage about the subject, as they are either passing mentions, profiles, or not reliable. GSS 💬 10:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nt sure if this index/metric is notable. Maybe it should be merged elsewhere or just deleted BoraVoro ( talk) 12:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; merge with University of California, San Diego#Student life. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Slovakia at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Luge as ATD because I could not find enough in-depth coverage for this athlete to meet WP:GNG. I only found SME while the rest are brief mentions and profile database sources, both types of which are not independent. He was not even in the top three (?) luge winners of mentioned tournament. This might be WP:TOOSOON situation. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 10:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Routine coverage and awards; no reliable sources. Likely not meeting ANYBIO BoraVoro ( talk) 12:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. Most entries WP:UNSOURCED, or WP:ONESOURCE by Standish Hayes O'Grady from 1892 ( WP:AGEMATTERS). Follow-up to
WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN WP:UNSOURCED. Follow-up to
Not remotely notable. The only sources I could find covering these are primary sources, which don't really fulfill the notability guidelines. Additionally, the guidelines for books can't save the article as it hasn't won any awards or got any reviews. OhHaiMark ( talk) 11:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Being an Azerbaijani Deputy does not make a person encyclopedic. Not according to the criteria. -- Correspondentman ( talk) 11:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill and other insufficient sources without proper in-depth coverage of the subject. Fails GNG, NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 07:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:Delete per
WP:NCORP
104.7.152.180 (
talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely from DJ Mag which is a single source. Wikilover3509 ( talk) 7:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
TheNuggeteer ( talk) 12:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Article does not meet notability guidelines of WP:POLITICIAN TheNuggeteer ( talk) 07:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm doubting that the software is notable based on the sources cited. -- Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet NCORP; not sufficient independent media coverage; routine Run-of-the-mill announcements. BoraVoro ( talk) 07:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:Delete per
WP:NCORP
104.7.152.180 (
talk) 13:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the previous AFDs, this discussion can not be closed as "Soft Deletion".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to meet WP:NCORP due to insufficient sourcing BoraVoro ( talk) 07:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability concerns; no reliable sources; possible original research BoraVoro ( talk) 07:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nationalism in Trinidad and Tobago may well be a thing, but I struggle to see where this article even addresses it. It is written like an essay and attempts to divine nationalism from an arbitrary selection of social and cultural issues, apparently with mostly irrelevant sourcing. For example source [3] is attached to the claim that calypso music is a form of Trinbagonian nationalism... the source, besides not really being an RS, says nothing of the sort. The dispute with Barbados should more properly be in Barbados-Trinidad and Tobago relations and the entire "Evolution" section, besides mostly being SYNTH, has content that should really be in LGBT rights in Trinidad and Tobago.
There is no RS that unifies these disparate topics - Trinbagonian culture, the dispute with Barbados, and LGBT rights - into a single topic about nationalism in the country. Thus, in my view, the article should be deleted. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ my edits) 06:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NCRIC. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 04:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Thank you both for your input. JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure) JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO because the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES are all primary, including biographies and the like by related parties. No particular claim to notability is textually clear. Her one-year tenure in an apparently quickly cycling sub-national (canton) government body doesn't add anything to make this subject notable. Other than the Mont Pelerin Society which she led for a while, none of her other orgs are actually notable; see their AfD discussions. Cheers! JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO because the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES are primary, including biographies and the like by related parties. No particular claim to notability is textually clear. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. It hasn't had sources since at least 2012 if ever. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is unsourced. I don't see why this topic deserves an article as there are no sources on the Imperium series, only sources on the individual movies. MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Adding together many non-notable topics still gives you a non-notable topic. Some character articles like Sarah Jane Smith are notable but does not support having a list about every character in the series, which do not have significant coverage as required by WP:N. Jontesta ( talk) 03:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or Merge? No support so far for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
small
HTML tag that caused display problems on pages transcluding this AfD. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄) 07:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:FILMMAKER. The majority of sources either aren't independent or provide only a passing mention. I found two sources that may contribute to notability ( [21] [22]). I am not 100% sure about the reliability of the latter source. GMH Melbourne ( talk) 03:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. It hasn't had sources since at least 2017 if ever. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software. A PROD was removed in 2012. SL93 ( talk) 02:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant and random list of pageant contestants has stood unreferenced for going on a decade. (Last referenced version was November 2015). Better to start over, if someone cares to. ☆ Bri ( talk) 02:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article has been PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Not satisfied with the reliability of sources. I could not find anything else online either. GMH Melbourne ( talk) 02:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: if you are arguing to Keep this article, please share source that can be used to establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. References are trivial mentions or don't mention subject. Can't find anything on Google/news about him. C F A 💬 02:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely unsourced and out-of-date. Insufficiently distinct from Mathematics education in the United States. Possibly could be redirected to New York Regents Examinations. Walsh90210 ( talk) 02:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 16:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 03:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep. Patuawa-Nathan and her work have been the subject of PhD research: report here and doctoral thesis available here. Paora ( talk) 05:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; most sources are from the FCC. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I'll admit that I'm a bit unsure about this article. There are a lot of citations in the article, but all of them are routine and/or match reports. There seems to be little or no WP:SIGCOV here. Anwegmann ( talk) 00:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Years ago this term was circulated once on social media by right wing trolls, but there is no significant coverage of this non-notable term in any reliable sources. Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rugby BLP. All I found were transactional announcements ( 1, 2). Possible redirect targets include List of Widnes Vikings players and List of Wigan Warriors players. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Coverage is mainly local and not wider as per WP:AUD. Only one article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Sample of the 1968 Cass Elliot/Mamas & Papas cover recording not an improvement to understanding a 1930s classic song previously sung by other artists before the cover recording. Doesn't contextually signify the song in question. George Ho ( talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Not "own work"; can't be CC0 Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
There's already an album cover at the article, a second one doesn't significantly improve contextual understanding per
WP:NFCC8. —Matrix(!) {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely typo. Created by same user as #Geegle Earth below. Mia Mahey ( talk) 17:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Target no longer untitled. After almost 2 months since the previous nomination, the page views for both redirects are incredibly minimal. Delete both per WP:UFILM. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:UFILM. The target subject no longer untitled, and the article was moved to its current title in February 2024, 4 months ago, which is greater than WP:UFILM's 30-day minimum. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
See page history. It's clearly not the creator's intention but this redirect implies Wikipedia considers the title to be an alternative term for LGBT, which is extremely undesirable to say the least. J 947 ‡ edits 02:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
References
Unlikely typo. Created by same user as Geegle earth, which was deleted in 2020. Mia Mahey ( talk) 02:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox has only three blue links and only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox has only three blue links and only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 10:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused Iranian map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused citation template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused table. ATP Challenger Tour#Prize money and ranking points uses a different table. Gonnym ( talk) 10:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused external link template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused external link template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as the table was subst into article. Gonnym ( talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as the bracket is used directly in 2023–24 College Football Playoff. Gonnym ( talk) 10:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as Template:2024–25 Ligue 1 table is the one used. Gonnym ( talk) 10:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
An unused empty table template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused fraternity templates. See also Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024 May 25#FratChapter2 template set deletion. Gonnym ( talk) 09:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2006. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Hoax draft. William Graham talk 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Created by blocked IP user. Incorrect information and hoax logo. Any true information already exists in WWE Raw. William Graham talk 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC) What's the criteria for deletion of unpublished pages because, despite my contribution to the page, I couldn't publish it.
NOTWEBHOST - this is a blatant attempt to share their CV on WP Gbawden ( talk) 07:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTABLE Rah io 1234 05:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was this. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. While on first glance there is significant coverage, all of it is press release, churnalism, routine announcements, or otherwise sources that fails WP:ORGCRIT. Even Forbes was generated by the company itself and the rest look like a well-run press campaign. Absent in-depth independent coverage, I do not see how this meets notability guidelines. CNMall41 ( talk) 17:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This article does not belong in an encyclopedia. It appears that what is described in the article does not correlate one-to-one with the title of the article. The article describes "stability" of leave-one-out error, whereas the title of the article is leave-one-out error. The title could be changed appropriately, to "stability of leave-one-out error", but then it would be even more clear that an article like this does not belong in an encyclopedia. Looking at WP:NOT, Wikipedia is just not supposed to be a textbook or a scientific journal, where this article might belong. It is too technical, it does not sufficiently define the math terms, and is overall unreadable. Even for someone who is relatively familiar with this method, this article just does not convey anything meaningful. A reader who wants to learn about this in such detail will not look in an encyclopedia, they will look in research papers and textbooks on the method. Manyyassin ( talk) 16:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. The only thing I found was this webpage (not article) on The Salt Lake Tribune's website. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Demoscene#List of demoparties. toweli ( talk) 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Violates many versions of WP:NOT. I could not find any mention of their name on the listed source, as well as being unable to find any RS regarding Ghosh and their campaign. A candidate for a political office is not notable in of itself and their business career has not provided any sources. Grahaml35 ( talk) 15:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No apparent signs of notability for this brand of safety footwear. The only Google results are for outlets that sell the brand, and the only news results discuss the relaunch of the brand by International Brands Group after the original manufacturer went out of business. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 14:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Only one source is independent and significant. User:Namiba 14:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. All provided sources (except perhaps NZHerald, which is directly about subject's work) are not WP:SIGCOV. Instances of WP:SYNTH and failed verification of inline sourced claims. Melmann 14:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability- in addition to the sources that describe her activities in greater depth, in total RS show she's a prominent member of multiple conversion therapy groups who's been publicly advocating in multiple countries and court systems for years.
Most of the sources are either regional publication (mainly the Otago Daily Times), university newspapers (Critic Te Arohi) and primary-sourced YouTube video. I only see two national sources. The first I can't access, and the second is a mention of a cannabis museum but does not go into detail. ― Panamitsu (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet any of the criteria for WP:ARTIST. Only 1 article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 14:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 14:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Beyond lacking a title and release date, none of the available coverage is in significant depth or particularly independent, as it comprises newspapers quoting the artists directly for vague details about their upcoming collaborative project, and one article about a concert where the artists played together (but which does not mention any upcoming album). Searching online for the artists' names only turns up coverage about prior work together. As the advertised album does not list either artist as the primary artist, and neither of their biography articles discuss the upcoming project, so the usual album ATD of redirecting to the recording artist does not apply. signed, Rosguill talk 14:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; written like a TV guide. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong Keep : The article's subject is notable. Thanthi one is an airing new TV channel from Daily Thanthi Group in Tamil Nadu. They already have one channel Thanthi TV. strong source from (www.dailythanthi.com, www.afaqs.com, www.medianews4u.com, cinema.vikatan.com). It deserves to be kept. in future can we add more source. This is not TV guide, only added programs broadcast by Thanthi One. Official Web ( Thanthi One, Thanthi One's channel on YouTube)-- P.Karthik.95 ( talk) 15:07, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The BFI source which would have been useful returns a 404 error. The other from IMDB is unreliable. Searches reveal very little, certainly nothing that adds to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Based on Talk:Richard N. Holzapfel#WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, it appears that the subject of the article is requesting deletion of the article. It doesn't appear from the current article text that he qualifies as a public figure so WP:BIODELETE could apply. FyzixFighter ( talk) 13:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and very short (4 entries) list without much context. I don't think there's much reason for it to exist as its own article, as opposed to those events being described in the Penghu article. toweli ( talk) 13:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 13:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan ( talk) 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient number of references for the significance of the article Welcome to Pandora ( talk) 11:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Lacks significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The current sources do not provide the required coverage about the subject, as they are either passing mentions, profiles, or not reliable. GSS 💬 10:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nt sure if this index/metric is notable. Maybe it should be merged elsewhere or just deleted BoraVoro ( talk) 12:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; merge with University of California, San Diego#Student life. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 12:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Slovakia at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Luge as ATD because I could not find enough in-depth coverage for this athlete to meet WP:GNG. I only found SME while the rest are brief mentions and profile database sources, both types of which are not independent. He was not even in the top three (?) luge winners of mentioned tournament. This might be WP:TOOSOON situation. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 10:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Hey man im josh (
talk) 12:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Routine coverage and awards; no reliable sources. Likely not meeting ANYBIO BoraVoro ( talk) 12:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 12:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN. Most entries WP:UNSOURCED, or WP:ONESOURCE by Standish Hayes O'Grady from 1892 ( WP:AGEMATTERS). Follow-up to
WP:MILMOS#BATTLESIN WP:UNSOURCED. Follow-up to
Not remotely notable. The only sources I could find covering these are primary sources, which don't really fulfill the notability guidelines. Additionally, the guidelines for books can't save the article as it hasn't won any awards or got any reviews. OhHaiMark ( talk) 11:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Being an Azerbaijani Deputy does not make a person encyclopedic. Not according to the criteria. -- Correspondentman ( talk) 11:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Run-of-the-mill and other insufficient sources without proper in-depth coverage of the subject. Fails GNG, NCORP BoraVoro ( talk) 07:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:Delete per
WP:NCORP
104.7.152.180 (
talk) 13:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 08:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely from DJ Mag which is a single source. Wikilover3509 ( talk) 7:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
TheNuggeteer ( talk) 12:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Article does not meet notability guidelines of WP:POLITICIAN TheNuggeteer ( talk) 07:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm doubting that the software is notable based on the sources cited. -- Beland ( talk) 07:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails to meet NCORP; not sufficient independent media coverage; routine Run-of-the-mill announcements. BoraVoro ( talk) 07:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:Delete per
WP:NCORP
104.7.152.180 (
talk) 13:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the previous AFDs, this discussion can not be closed as "Soft Deletion".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely to meet WP:NCORP due to insufficient sourcing BoraVoro ( talk) 07:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:16, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Notability concerns; no reliable sources; possible original research BoraVoro ( talk) 07:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Nationalism in Trinidad and Tobago may well be a thing, but I struggle to see where this article even addresses it. It is written like an essay and attempts to divine nationalism from an arbitrary selection of social and cultural issues, apparently with mostly irrelevant sourcing. For example source [3] is attached to the claim that calypso music is a form of Trinbagonian nationalism... the source, besides not really being an RS, says nothing of the sort. The dispute with Barbados should more properly be in Barbados-Trinidad and Tobago relations and the entire "Evolution" section, besides mostly being SYNTH, has content that should really be in LGBT rights in Trinidad and Tobago.
There is no RS that unifies these disparate topics - Trinbagonian culture, the dispute with Barbados, and LGBT rights - into a single topic about nationalism in the country. Thus, in my view, the article should be deleted. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/ my edits) 06:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NCRIC. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 04:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Thank you both for your input. JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure) JFHJr ( ㊟) 04:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO because the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES are all primary, including biographies and the like by related parties. No particular claim to notability is textually clear. Her one-year tenure in an apparently quickly cycling sub-national (canton) government body doesn't add anything to make this subject notable. Other than the Mont Pelerin Society which she led for a while, none of her other orgs are actually notable; see their AfD discussions. Cheers! JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO because the WP:LOTSOFSOURCES are primary, including biographies and the like by related parties. No particular claim to notability is textually clear. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. It hasn't had sources since at least 2012 if ever. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The article is unsourced. I don't see why this topic deserves an article as there are no sources on the Imperium series, only sources on the individual movies. MKsLifeInANutshell ( talk) 05:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST. Adding together many non-notable topics still gives you a non-notable topic. Some character articles like Sarah Jane Smith are notable but does not support having a list about every character in the series, which do not have significant coverage as required by WP:N. Jontesta ( talk) 03:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or Merge? No support so far for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
small
HTML tag that caused display problems on pages transcluding this AfD. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄) 07:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:FILMMAKER. The majority of sources either aren't independent or provide only a passing mention. I found two sources that may contribute to notability ( [21] [22]). I am not 100% sure about the reliability of the latter source. GMH Melbourne ( talk) 03:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. It hasn't had sources since at least 2017 if ever. JFHJr ( ㊟) 03:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable software. A PROD was removed in 2012. SL93 ( talk) 02:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Irrelevant and random list of pageant contestants has stood unreferenced for going on a decade. (Last referenced version was November 2015). Better to start over, if someone cares to. ☆ Bri ( talk) 02:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article has been PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Not satisfied with the reliability of sources. I could not find anything else online either. GMH Melbourne ( talk) 02:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: if you are arguing to Keep this article, please share source that can be used to establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BASIC. References are trivial mentions or don't mention subject. Can't find anything on Google/news about him. C F A 💬 02:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely unsourced and out-of-date. Insufficiently distinct from Mathematics education in the United States. Possibly could be redirected to New York Regents Examinations. Walsh90210 ( talk) 02:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) LibStar ( talk) 16:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BIO. LibStar ( talk) 03:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep. Patuawa-Nathan and her work have been the subject of PhD research: report here and doctoral thesis available here. Paora ( talk) 05:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; most sources are from the FCC. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
I'll admit that I'm a bit unsure about this article. There are a lot of citations in the article, but all of them are routine and/or match reports. There seems to be little or no WP:SIGCOV here. Anwegmann ( talk) 00:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Years ago this term was circulated once on social media by right wing trolls, but there is no significant coverage of this non-notable term in any reliable sources. Ratnahastin ( talk) 02:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced rugby BLP. All I found were transactional announcements ( 1, 2). Possible redirect targets include List of Widnes Vikings players and List of Wigan Warriors players. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORG. Coverage is mainly local and not wider as per WP:AUD. Only one article links to this. LibStar ( talk) 01:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Sample of the 1968 Cass Elliot/Mamas & Papas cover recording not an improvement to understanding a 1930s classic song previously sung by other artists before the cover recording. Doesn't contextually signify the song in question. George Ho ( talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Not "own work"; can't be CC0 Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 14:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
There's already an album cover at the article, a second one doesn't significantly improve contextual understanding per
WP:NFCC8. —Matrix(!) {
user -
talk? -
uselesscontributions} 18:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely typo. Created by same user as #Geegle Earth below. Mia Mahey ( talk) 17:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Target no longer untitled. After almost 2 months since the previous nomination, the page views for both redirects are incredibly minimal. Delete both per WP:UFILM. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete per WP:UFILM. The target subject no longer untitled, and the article was moved to its current title in February 2024, 4 months ago, which is greater than WP:UFILM's 30-day minimum. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
See page history. It's clearly not the creator's intention but this redirect implies Wikipedia considers the title to be an alternative term for LGBT, which is extremely undesirable to say the least. J 947 ‡ edits 02:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
References
Unlikely typo. Created by same user as Geegle earth, which was deleted in 2020. Mia Mahey ( talk) 02:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox has only three blue links and only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox has only three blue links and only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Navbox only transcluded onto three articles, does not warrant existence of this navigation template. No prejudice against recreation once enough articles have been created related to this topic. Eagles 24/7 (C) 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 10:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused Iranian map. Gonnym ( talk) 10:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused citation template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused table. ATP Challenger Tour#Prize money and ranking points uses a different table. Gonnym ( talk) 10:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused external link template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused external link template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused route template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as the table was subst into article. Gonnym ( talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as the bracket is used directly in 2023–24 College Football Playoff. Gonnym ( talk) 10:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused as Template:2024–25 Ligue 1 table is the one used. Gonnym ( talk) 10:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
An unused empty table template. Gonnym ( talk) 10:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused fraternity templates. See also Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024 May 25#FratChapter2 template set deletion. Gonnym ( talk) 09:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Unused module. Gonnym ( talk) 08:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No transclusions or incoming links. Created in 2006. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 02:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Hoax draft. William Graham talk 14:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Created by blocked IP user. Incorrect information and hoax logo. Any true information already exists in WWE Raw. William Graham talk 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC) What's the criteria for deletion of unpublished pages because, despite my contribution to the page, I couldn't publish it.
NOTWEBHOST - this is a blatant attempt to share their CV on WP Gbawden ( talk) 07:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability and fails WP:NOTDIR. Additionally, I call into question WP:NOTWEBHOST, since there's been no edits displaying any intent to add any sources to this draft for meeting main space requirements. All edits by the contributing author have thus far been to add each week's latest aired episode titles, a pattern going on 9+ months now. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
WP:NOTABLE Rah io 1234 05:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)