![]() |
The result was redirect to Schismatrix. If you would prefer a different redirect target article, please discuss it on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and WP:OR. Little coverage of locations are found, therefore failing WP:GNG. Jontesta ( talk) 23:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 15:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. A search in Google news only found equestrian related sources which are not third party. LibStar ( talk) 18:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A merger discussion could happen to see if that gains traction as an ATD, but that does not require a relist where there's no possibility of a consensus to delete. Star Mississippi 16:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTA AND WP:GNG BryceM2001 ( talk) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion divided between Keep, Delete and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to France–Pakistan relations as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 16:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTCRIT - we don't need list of red links.. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has been mostly unsourced since its creation eight years ago. Some of it is cited to Twitter and Instagram, plus three sources that tell us that one of the characters is inspired by Martha Stewart. This fails WP:GNG (and is a fork of the equally badly sourced article List of Orange Is the New Black characters). Jontesta ( talk) 23:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G5. XOR'easter ( talk) 03:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Draftify moved unilaterally to main space when unready. I think the subject might potentially have some notability, but the article is not written to show it, nor referenced to show it. Flagged as failing WP:GNG after arriving in mainspace by the editor who moved it to mainspace. Being charitable, this feels as if the move were in some manner accidental. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 21:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. School sports isn't notable in the world of athletics, and coverage of children's athletics is not significant enough for Wikipedia. WP:TOOSOON with a few years at best. Geschichte ( talk) 19:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. School sports isn't notable in the world of athletics, and coverage of children's athletics is not significant enough for Wikipedia. WP:TOOSOON with a few years at best. Geschichte ( talk) 19:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG - non-notable office Saqib ( talk I contribs) 21:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 14:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Notabillity issue. Thewikizoomer ( talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A fuller deletion rationale would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already deleted by PROD so not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Nyttend as a G7 after author blanking. Bearcat ( talk) 13:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
This page with the typo should be merged or deleted with Karoline Leavitt, (correct spelling). - JoeK2033
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 19:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. (side of IAR, but with one silent relist there's no indication input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 16:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and what's linked in the article doesn't establish notability. Surprisingly, there isn't significant coverage of the group in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár .
I am also bundling the disk magazine European Top 20 published by Equinox in this nomination. toweli ( talk) 18:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Interactive fiction or a subsection thereof as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 17:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The game was deproded with the rationale that it won awards, but this has no bearing on notability. It lacks significant coverage from reliable sources to justify and fill out a standalone article. It cites clearly user-generated reviews in the vast majority of the reception section rather than actual critics. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
It would be helpful if other participants commented on the replies to their arguments above. -- Bensin ( talk) 15:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The Q&A already in the article is the closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found in my searches. The subject fails WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) A possible redirect is 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete This subject lacks any reliable, secondhand and thirdhand, sources that I can find. Also, the article is self-promotional, lacking any analysis that critically reviews its organization and charity efforts. Paul H. ( talk) 20:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Any user can redirect this title to a suitable target if one is found. ✗ plicit 14:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Scouting council is an organization, thus is expected to meet WP:NCORP which the organization in question fails miserably. Hyper-local branch of a larger organization. WP:BRANCH. I suggest delete, and re-direct to target if suitable one can be found. Graywalls ( talk) 16:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 18:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. Does not meet notability:events. BTW the lead is the main article and the whole lead is copyvio. I didn't zap it because then there would be no article. North8000 ( talk) 19:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Snowball chance in hell that this AfD will be sucessful, there is already sufficient consensus to keep article. ( non-admin closure) 21 Andromedae ( talk) 21:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Biting the bullet here and nominating this page for deletion a sixth time. My reasoning here is quite simple: this is not an appropriate topic for a list in the mainspace. Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia which this page plainly is. Each one of the listings is, at most, appropriate for a single line on their respective pages. The sources cited on this page are often low-quality, including television (1) shows (2), recipe aggregators like Allrecipes and Cookthink, Dotdash Meredith subsidiaries like Thoughtco ( deprecated), random blogs including at least one Wordpress-hosted site, and mainly, blatant plagiarism from Snopes (actually, this whole article is practically Snopes Wikipedia-style.) Therefore I think this page should be deleted from the mainspace, and if it must be kept, then moved to the meta namespace ala Wikipedia:Unusual articles since it does serve an educational purpose. wound theology ◈ 19:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. The link, WP:LISTPURP, says of the first,
The list may be a valuable information source... [which] would include lists... grouped by theme, or annotated lists. The list, as of this comment, is grouped by academic discipline and is arguably annotated as each entry goes beyond a definition. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 03:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 20:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find any independent sources on this artist or his work outside of a single review published in Frieze. This fails WP:ARTIST. Rocfan275 ( talk) 19:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 18:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable person. WP:BIO1E applies; the ordinary coverage of his death are the only sources. List of ETA attacks might be a redirect option. Walsh90210 ( talk) 18:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 19:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Raph Koster. toweli ( talk) 18:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Guna district. Star Mississippi 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No sources given, only one I could find with a WP:BEFORE was this, of which I'm not sure of the reliability. I don't think it meets GNG, but I'm not good at navigating Hindi-language sources so I hope to be positively surprised if there are other sources on it. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: Previously moved to draftspace as Draft:Champavati Fort Chachaura and then recreated in mainspace. Johnj1995 ( talk) 18:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to West Visayas State University where a subsection can be created should there prove to be other such publications. Forge Media is one model thereof that might be helpful here. Star Mississippi 19:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student publication. No independent references. If there's anything of value in this article, it can be merged to West Visayas State University. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zee Kannada. The history is preserved should someone want to implement the merger Star Mississippi 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST as references do not talk about the programming as a whole. In addition, these are not original programs, they are remakes or adaptions. WP:NOTTVGUIDE would apply. Possible redirect to Zee Kannada as an WP:ATD but would not suggest a merge unless any of these can be found to be original programming. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Yaaradi Nee Mohini (TV series). While consensus is split on the target, that is not an admin decision. I have chosen the one that is not currently at AfD but someone can redirect as a matter of editorial discretion. Star Mississippi 19:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Rehashing my nomination rationale listed in Kalyana Vaibhogam (TV series) - The references are WP:NEWSORGINDIA all out of the same publication. A WP:BEFORE found no better references. Attempted a redirect as an WP:ATD but it was restored by an IP. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Neopets. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
While I played this game as a child and thoroughly enjoyed it, it is sadly non-notable. I've found no sources that weren't passing mentions: if this discussion fails to turn up SIGCOV, then it should be redirected to Neopets, which it is a spinoff of (though a sourced mention should be added to the body of the Neopets article) PARAKANYAA ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't Meet WP:NCORP. All I find it self-published sources, press releases and listings. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Steps were taken to locate said sources
WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Note that this article was previously nominated for deletion nearly a decade ago on September 2015, where there was limited discourse and the outcome was speedy keep.
Reviewing the history of this article, there also appears to be a running content dispute over the origin and application of this phrase. While this may be a plausible search term on the internet, I do not see valid sourcing to support this as an article or redirect on Wikipedia, hence my recommendation for deletion.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 16:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Oreshkovo airfield. Star Mississippi 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is about a non-notable animal. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV - press reporting was fleeting and fairly trivial. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. It appears that the issues can be resolved via editing. Star Mississippi 16:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Although this article has existed for a long time, I believe it should be deleted for for reasons of notability and being promotional in nature.
The article recently came under scrutiny due to a COI discussion about the User:RRichie (who is probably Rob Richie of FairVote).
- FairVote is in the top hits for democracy terms like "ranked choice voting", "instant runoff", "voter turnout"" statewide recounts" and so on
- CSPAN frequently has the organization and its co-founder on the program over the years. See https://www.c-span.org/search/basic/?query=fairvote https://www.c-span.org/search/basic/?query=%22rob+richie%22
- New York Times & Washington Post have multiple hits for FairVote and stories citing it resources, quoting its staff or publishing its staff (not all hits are the org, but most) https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=fairvote https://www.washingtonpost.com/search/?query=fairvote
- Charity Navigator, the nonprofit rating entity, gives it a 100%, 4-star rating: https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/541635649
This is just the tip of the iceberg. 173.66.181.85 ( talk) 17:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable pizza chain; doesn't satisfy WP:NORG or WP:SIGCOV. The current references are trivial and/or repeated from press releases and I can find nothing else. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A bit early but a pretty clear SNOW conclusion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. "Stats only" sources and a stats-only article with stats about a football club's 1985-1986 season. North8000 ( talk) 14:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Closing early. But to correct the nominator, I don't see that any editor who worked on this article is blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability. The sources are just either announcements (e.g. on securing funding) or republishing of their press releases/self-bio. Same for the content of the article,. Creator is indeffed for COI promotional creation. North8000 ( talk) 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
sure!when asked if he has
at least two deep or significant sourcesas per the previous AfD. Jay 💬 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Some days ago, Wikilover3509 ( talk · contribs) tried to nominate this article for deletion, but ended up editing a previous nomination for a previous article at this title. Their rationale follows:
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, just press releases and blog posts.
This is mostly procedural on my part; I offer no opinion or further comment beyond noting that this has been tagged as, among other things, a possible WP:CORP failure since 2012. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
13:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous relist has not cleared things up.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. Contested CSD. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Murree#History. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Well it has needed more sourcing since 2014, much of the content seems to be about other events, and there is no real; evidence of notable coverage.
As well as some of the sources being a bit iffy. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
13:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
...Murree had played a small and insignificant role [in the Indian rebellion of 1857, and goes on to detail minor disorganized skirmishes. This seems appropriate to mention in the location's history as its local, minor participation in a major historical event (and it already is mentioned there), but it doesn't seem to be DUE for more than a sentence at Indian rebellion of 1857 and currently isn't mentioned there at all. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Obscure businessman, lacks direct and in-depth coverage as a person (not as a business). Fails WP:GNG. FinnPanda ( talk) 12:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the article does not seem to be notable. The article has not been edited in 3 years and only contains two independent sources. PercyPigUK ( talk) 12:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 11:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There are a couple of marginal reviews of the band's album Nightmares, but not much else, nothing that suggests WP:BAND is satisfied. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket writer. Article was previously deleted in 2007, but there is still no evidence of the subject's notability. – Pee Jay 11:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 11:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The article has no non-dead sources and searches for "Union Stadium south africa" return real information (i.e. not maps or directions). The only search results on JSTOR are a university paper in Wisconsin and a local paper in Ohio, both of which are hardly reliable sources for a stadium in South Africa. For this reason, I feel the article does not meet general notability guidelines. WikipediaNMP ( talk) 09:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 11:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I took a some time to dig sources and find the reason why this article meets WP:NSONG but can't find either. The song topped a non notable chart and hasn't been covered significantly in reliable news sources. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not have references even though it is a biography, the only thing I could find were news outlets talking about his son, Demetrio Cortes Jr. TheNuggeteer ( talk) 08:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aydoh8 (
talk |
contribs)
09:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 01:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Nonnotable parody travel guide. I found only a single reasonable ref -
Altenmann
>talk
09:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: "Travel writers Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Stich are at it again. In their new guide to the fictional land of San Sombrero (San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC, 2006) they serve up a tantalising platter of tropicalizations, exoticized culinary fixations, superficial politico-economic analyses and a hefty dose of feel-good in-group reinforcement, all for 'the undiscerning traveller' (cover). But before you rush out to buy San Sombrero: A Land of Carnivals, Cocktails and Coups, you might take a moment to consider why this type of work is considered humorous. Although you may be tickled by its approach and impressed by its slick appearance, the guide is no less problematic for taking on a fictionalized topic."
The review notes: "This guide to a land whose main attraction is its lack of extradition treaties is the latest offering in the Jet Lag series which brought us the hilarious Molvania and Phaic Tan. I don't think it's quite as funny as its predecessors - though that may be because having chuckled my way through both I knew what to expect - but it's still a delight to read. ... Bad taste? Sure. That's the point."
The review notes: "If you're not taking a vacation this summer, then you're dreaming of taking one. Either way, you'll get a lot of laughs out of the Jetlag Travel Guide series. ... Of course, it is all these things — and more — making this sun drenched republic one of the most exciting travel destinations in all of Central America." Go to www.jetlagtravel.com and get a taste of these books for yourself. Just be prepared to laugh. A lot."
The review notes: "First there was Molvania, followed by Phaic Tan. Now, welcome to San Sombrero, a land of carnivals, cocktails and coups. The third Jetlag Travel Guide comes once again from the fertile minds of the Working Dog Productions team. Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Sitch have come up with the definitive guide to what you can expect if you go to South America. Well, sort of. San Sombrero, like Molvania and Phaic Tan, doesn't exist, but, in line with the first two, it can give you a definitive taste of a people and their culture. San Sombrero could be a smattering of Brazil mixed in with a pinch of Cuba and a dash of Mexico."
The review notes: "San Sombrero, which is a follow-up to previous guides on Molvania and Phaic Tan, is promoted as a "land of carnivals, cocktails and coups". The guide, which comes with a convincing array of photographs, describes San Sombrerans as essentially laid-back people, so much so that the inaugural marathon race had to be abandoned as most of the field were still chatting several hours after the official start."
The review notes: "This is a hilarious spoof travel guide to a fictional Central American country. Extremely lightheartedly, it satirises eco- and adventure-travellers and the way many guides gloss over negative aspects of a place. As well as ludicrous detailed descriptions of San Sombrero's culture, history and politics ('it boasts the only Nobel Peace Prize winner to be accused of war crimes'), there are useful symbols denoting everything from 'military installation' to 'illegal wildlife for sale'."
The review notes: "From the authors of Molvania and Phaic Tan comes San Sombrro: A Land Of Carnivals, Cocktails and Coups (Jetlag, $29.95). Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Sitch explore Central America's most politically incorrect nation. Its attractions include "tropical charms, an exotic lifestyle and lack of extradition treaties". San Sombrro is a place where the church permits animal sacrifice, school canteens sell rum and its most famous war criminal won a Nobel Prize. There are useful chapters on cigarette brands, bull fighting, feminism and the telephone system. Totally hilarious - even the contributor profiles are funny. Available at all silly bookshops."
The result was delete. The keep arguments do not have policy behind them making this not as close as it appears Star Mississippi 16:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming comedian not notable for a page. References from unreliable sources and mostly trivial mentions Runmastery ( talk) 07:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aydoh8 (
talk |
contribs)
09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per tagging for WP:G4 -- article previously deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chioma Rowland . — CactusWriter (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Being a wife of a notable person doesn't mean the wife should be notable. No! It's WP:INHERITED. Besides, celebrities can be influential but not notable. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep No good arguments provided to delete this article. Discussion of a merge can continue outside of an AfD if editors still think it might be worth doing. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
already have Li Keqiang Government & China under Xi Jinping Coddlebean ( talk) 08:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
the Central People's Government of China from 15 March 2013, when Premier Li Keqiang took office, until March 2023, while Xi Jinping–Li Keqiang Administration is
the administration of China from 2013 to 2023. Both articles list the State Council members, and do little else; it's not obvious that the articles should not be merged. (I agree that China under Xi Jinping is clearly very different). Walsh90210 ( talk) 01:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
details about the distribution of power between Xi and Licannot be included in Li Keqiang Government.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No independent significant coverage anywhere, seems to just be WP:TRIVIAL coverage online. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 08:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP as well as WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 07:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable location within Mamaroneck, New York. Only thing I can find out about the place is that a 2021 trench collapse that killed a worker occurred there, but I doubt that alone would pass the notability criteria. Procyon117 ( talk) 15:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Censorship in Turkey. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable YouTuber Runmastery ( talk) 07:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 14:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt ( talk) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eastport–Kingsgate Border Crossing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There's not a single reliable source online to put in this article, and it seems like nothing more than a small stub. NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 03:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1998 Asian Games – Men's team squads#North Korea. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Per WP:SNOW there is no chance this discussion will arrive at any other outcome. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This article describes social concerns about the exposure of drag to children as "hysteria," "moral panic," and "extremism." Regardless of whether one might be inclined to agree with such statements, there is not sufficient evidence to call one side of a very polarized political divide "hysterical." This article thus claims a seriously contested assertion to be fact, something which has a strong prohibition on it in WP:VOICE. JustAPoliticsNerd ( talk) 02:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I will note that sometimes an article is so Broken that deletion is the only way to fix it (or to put it another way, there is nothing worth saving), but this is not one such article. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
this is heading for a snow close. Slatersteven ( talk) 08:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thank you to the editors who did their due diligence, looking for actual sources about this middle school and evaluating Chinese sources. When AFD works, it is because of contributions like yours. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Pure vandalism, cross-wiki abuse, the article with the same name in Chinese Wikipedia was deleted by a sysop. Allervous ( talk) 02:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The block discussion is here. Here is a Google Translate of that discussion:
Extended content
|
---|
鸡景行 ( Discussion · Contributions · Log [Ban · Filter] · Global Account Information) zh:灵山县灵城第三中学 (Edit | Discussion | History | Links | Monitor | Log) Just making it up.
Discovered by: Kcx36 (Message) 17:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC) zh:Special:Diff/82824332/83166384, suspected to be imitating Zhemao. --Kcx36 (Message) 17:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
zh:User:鸡景行/钟娟章, seems to be pranking his teacher. --Kcx36 (Message) 17:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) pages.dev is Cloudflare Pages. It is hard to believe that this is the official website of the school. --HeihaHeihaHa-Muggle... (Message) 17:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC) |
The result was redirect to List of Hindi films of 1977. I don't see a strict consensus for any outcome but this closure would accommodate the opinions of the most participants. I would have closed this AFD discussion as "No consensus" if the references had included page numbers, ensuring that the article subject was actually discussed in them, but just listing books doesn't give me confidence this is the case. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. search only turns up a song of the same name and the phrase "kali raat". ltb d l ( talk) 01:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please review recently added sources to article to see if this satisfies the need for sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough significant coverage of this subject, an American rugby league footballer, to meet WP:GNG. My searches yielded a few trivial mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to British Rail departmental locomotives. I see a consensus to retain the content here but move it to a different article and turn this page into a redirect. I hope an editor knowledgeable on the subject will undertake this project of merging this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Wholly unsourced article since 2009 Danners430 ( talk) 16:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
22:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are the two sources enough to establish notability? Are there more sources we are missing?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
01:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, no consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No significant and independent coverage. Northern Moonlight 00:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jimmy Merchant. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I could find no secondary sources, ie reviews or commentary, about this book. Merge to Jimmy Merchant (as it is a memoir)? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard ( talk) 08:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Participants have brought up some additional sources that would address the nominator's concerns. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. Apart from a momentary controversy six years ago which was written up in the New York Times, the only independent coverage is from brief articles in local media, which per WP:AUD are not an indication of notability. Astaire ( talk) 00:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The editorial notes: "You might not have heard of the Oregon Battle of the Books, but for kids from 37 public and private schools in Deschutes County, it’s a big deal, and it’s coming up soon. ... Students across the state get lists of books geared to the competition’s three divisions, third through fifth grades, sixth through eighth grades and high school. There are 16 books on each of the lists for the younger two groups, and a dozen on the one for high schools. ... So I hope the Battle of the Books draws not only confirmed readers but also kids who’ve never really discovered the pleasure that comes from reading."
The article notes: "OBOB was initiated in 2006 and modeled on Battle of the Books programs that have been operating in other states for up to 25 years. The first competitions in Oregon were during the 2007-08 school year. ... Each team comes up with a name (Read S'more, Moustache Winners and Slightly Radioactive Gummy Bears are just a few of this year's examples), and some wear team T-shirts or colors to their battles. Many use strategies such as dividing the required reading up amongst the team members to create subject matter experts, while others take extensive notes and get together after school to quiz one another."
The article notes: "Emotions ran high at the fifth annual Oregon Battle of the Books, a statewide reading and literacy competition for students grades 3 through 12 Saturday at Chemeketa Community College in Salem. The tournament, sponsored by the Oregon Association of School Libraries, was the culmination of nearly a year of preparation by dedicated students and librarians. Competitors were in three categories, third through fifth grade, sixth through eighth and ninth through 12th. Each group had a reading list of 16 books, from which questions were selected. In all, there were 45 student teams from both public and private schools throughout Oregon."
The article notes: "This year marks the first time that the popular reading competition, which made its name in middle and elementary schools across the state, has expanded to the high school level. During this weekend's regional competition at Springfield High School, The Bibliophiles will compete against winning teams from 12 high schools in Lane, Douglas and Coos counties. ... Most teams split the reading load of 16 books among their members, with each member becoming an "expert" on four or five books. Members of both The Bibliophiles and It's a Secret were required to participate for their honors literature course - but they insisted they would have taken part anyway."
The article notes: "Students read 12 books to get ready — from John Green’s “The Fault in Our Stars” to Gaby Rodriguez’s “The Pregnancy Project.” During the round-robin, “quiz bowl” type contest, the bookworms had to answer “In which book...?” and content questions. Teams huddled together, whispering excitedly to get the answer within 15 seconds. Their teammates mouthed the answers to each other in the audience."
The Oregonian and The Register-Guard are the largest and second largest newspapers in the American state of Oregon. These two sources, which provide significant coverage about the subject, meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Audience. Cunard ( talk) 09:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)The source's audience must also be considered. Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least regional audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability. Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability. At least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
The result was keep. Discussions about moving the article can occur on the article talk page.
The nominator, who has been active for just 2 weeks, is advised to acquire more editing experience and policy knowledge before nominating articles for AFD discussions. That's my opinion, not consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV because it's singularly sourced to meet WP:NOTABILITY. I have notability concerns for this article; it must either be deleted or moved to a general article that lists this play. I've looked on the news, Google, books, and scholars but couldn't find anything. Normanhunter2 ( talk) 00:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Schismatrix. If you would prefer a different redirect target article, please discuss it on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Unsourced and WP:OR. Little coverage of locations are found, therefore failing WP:GNG. Jontesta ( talk) 23:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
23:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 15:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. A search in Google news only found equestrian related sources which are not third party. LibStar ( talk) 18:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
21:34, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A merger discussion could happen to see if that gains traction as an ATD, but that does not require a relist where there's no possibility of a consensus to delete. Star Mississippi 16:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTA AND WP:GNG BryceM2001 ( talk) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion divided between Keep, Delete and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to France–Pakistan relations as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 16:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:LISTCRIT - we don't need list of red links.. Saqib ( talk I contribs) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
This article has been mostly unsourced since its creation eight years ago. Some of it is cited to Twitter and Instagram, plus three sources that tell us that one of the characters is inspired by Martha Stewart. This fails WP:GNG (and is a fork of the equally badly sourced article List of Orange Is the New Black characters). Jontesta ( talk) 23:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:G5. XOR'easter ( talk) 03:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Draftify moved unilaterally to main space when unready. I think the subject might potentially have some notability, but the article is not written to show it, nor referenced to show it. Flagged as failing WP:GNG after arriving in mainspace by the editor who moved it to mainspace. Being charitable, this feels as if the move were in some manner accidental. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 21:00, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. School sports isn't notable in the world of athletics, and coverage of children's athletics is not significant enough for Wikipedia. WP:TOOSOON with a few years at best. Geschichte ( talk) 19:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 05:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. School sports isn't notable in the world of athletics, and coverage of children's athletics is not significant enough for Wikipedia. WP:TOOSOON with a few years at best. Geschichte ( talk) 19:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG - non-notable office Saqib ( talk I contribs) 21:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 14:41, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Notabillity issue. Thewikizoomer ( talk) 18:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A fuller deletion rationale would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already deleted by PROD so not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Nyttend as a G7 after author blanking. Bearcat ( talk) 13:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
This page with the typo should be merged or deleted with Karoline Leavitt, (correct spelling). - JoeK2033
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:N. Boleyn ( talk) 19:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. (side of IAR, but with one silent relist there's no indication input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 16:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources and what's linked in the article doesn't establish notability. Surprisingly, there isn't significant coverage of the group in Freax: The Brief History of the Demoscene, Volume 1 (2005) by Tamás Polgár .
I am also bundling the disk magazine European Top 20 published by Equinox in this nomination. toweli ( talk) 18:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Interactive fiction or a subsection thereof as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 17:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The game was deproded with the rationale that it won awards, but this has no bearing on notability. It lacks significant coverage from reliable sources to justify and fill out a standalone article. It cites clearly user-generated reviews in the vast majority of the reception section rather than actual critics. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 18:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
It would be helpful if other participants commented on the replies to their arguments above. -- Bensin ( talk) 15:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The Q&A already in the article is the closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found in my searches. The subject fails WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC) A possible redirect is 2017 Rugby League World Cup squads. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:51, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV; written like an advertisement. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 17:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete This subject lacks any reliable, secondhand and thirdhand, sources that I can find. Also, the article is self-promotional, lacking any analysis that critically reviews its organization and charity efforts. Paul H. ( talk) 20:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Any user can redirect this title to a suitable target if one is found. ✗ plicit 14:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Scouting council is an organization, thus is expected to meet WP:NCORP which the organization in question fails miserably. Hyper-local branch of a larger organization. WP:BRANCH. I suggest delete, and re-direct to target if suitable one can be found. Graywalls ( talk) 16:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
19:57, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 18:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. Does not meet notability:events. BTW the lead is the main article and the whole lead is copyvio. I didn't zap it because then there would be no article. North8000 ( talk) 19:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Snowball chance in hell that this AfD will be sucessful, there is already sufficient consensus to keep article. ( non-admin closure) 21 Andromedae ( talk) 21:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Biting the bullet here and nominating this page for deletion a sixth time. My reasoning here is quite simple: this is not an appropriate topic for a list in the mainspace. Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia which this page plainly is. Each one of the listings is, at most, appropriate for a single line on their respective pages. The sources cited on this page are often low-quality, including television (1) shows (2), recipe aggregators like Allrecipes and Cookthink, Dotdash Meredith subsidiaries like Thoughtco ( deprecated), random blogs including at least one Wordpress-hosted site, and mainly, blatant plagiarism from Snopes (actually, this whole article is practically Snopes Wikipedia-style.) Therefore I think this page should be deleted from the mainspace, and if it must be kept, then moved to the meta namespace ala Wikipedia:Unusual articles since it does serve an educational purpose. wound theology ◈ 19:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. The link, WP:LISTPURP, says of the first,
The list may be a valuable information source... [which] would include lists... grouped by theme, or annotated lists. The list, as of this comment, is grouped by academic discipline and is arguably annotated as each entry goes beyond a definition. Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs) 03:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 20:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I cannot find any independent sources on this artist or his work outside of a single review published in Frieze. This fails WP:ARTIST. Rocfan275 ( talk) 19:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 18:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Not a notable person. WP:BIO1E applies; the ordinary coverage of his death are the only sources. List of ETA attacks might be a redirect option. Walsh90210 ( talk) 18:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 19:17, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion is a redirect to Raph Koster. toweli ( talk) 18:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Guna district. Star Mississippi 20:45, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No sources given, only one I could find with a WP:BEFORE was this, of which I'm not sure of the reliability. I don't think it meets GNG, but I'm not good at navigating Hindi-language sources so I hope to be positively surprised if there are other sources on it. Chaotic Enby ( talk · contribs) 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Note: Previously moved to draftspace as Draft:Champavati Fort Chachaura and then recreated in mainspace. Johnj1995 ( talk) 18:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to West Visayas State University where a subsection can be created should there prove to be other such publications. Forge Media is one model thereof that might be helpful here. Star Mississippi 19:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable student publication. No independent references. If there's anything of value in this article, it can be merged to West Visayas State University. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 18:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Zee Kannada. The history is preserved should someone want to implement the merger Star Mississippi 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NLIST as references do not talk about the programming as a whole. In addition, these are not original programs, they are remakes or adaptions. WP:NOTTVGUIDE would apply. Possible redirect to Zee Kannada as an WP:ATD but would not suggest a merge unless any of these can be found to be original programming. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Yaaradi Nee Mohini (TV series). While consensus is split on the target, that is not an admin decision. I have chosen the one that is not currently at AfD but someone can redirect as a matter of editorial discretion. Star Mississippi 19:04, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Rehashing my nomination rationale listed in Kalyana Vaibhogam (TV series) - The references are WP:NEWSORGINDIA all out of the same publication. A WP:BEFORE found no better references. Attempted a redirect as an WP:ATD but it was restored by an IP. CNMall41 ( talk) 18:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Neopets. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 17:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
While I played this game as a child and thoroughly enjoyed it, it is sadly non-notable. I've found no sources that weren't passing mentions: if this discussion fails to turn up SIGCOV, then it should be redirected to Neopets, which it is a spinoff of (though a sourced mention should be added to the body of the Neopets article) PARAKANYAA ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't Meet WP:NCORP. All I find it self-published sources, press releases and listings. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 17:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Steps were taken to locate said sources
WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Note that this article was previously nominated for deletion nearly a decade ago on September 2015, where there was limited discourse and the outcome was speedy keep.
Reviewing the history of this article, there also appears to be a running content dispute over the origin and application of this phrase. While this may be a plausible search term on the internet, I do not see valid sourcing to support this as an article or redirect on Wikipedia, hence my recommendation for deletion.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should appropriate sources be located during the course of this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 16:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Oreshkovo airfield. Star Mississippi 16:42, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article is about a non-notable animal. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV - press reporting was fleeting and fairly trivial. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. It appears that the issues can be resolved via editing. Star Mississippi 16:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Although this article has existed for a long time, I believe it should be deleted for for reasons of notability and being promotional in nature.
The article recently came under scrutiny due to a COI discussion about the User:RRichie (who is probably Rob Richie of FairVote).
- FairVote is in the top hits for democracy terms like "ranked choice voting", "instant runoff", "voter turnout"" statewide recounts" and so on
- CSPAN frequently has the organization and its co-founder on the program over the years. See https://www.c-span.org/search/basic/?query=fairvote https://www.c-span.org/search/basic/?query=%22rob+richie%22
- New York Times & Washington Post have multiple hits for FairVote and stories citing it resources, quoting its staff or publishing its staff (not all hits are the org, but most) https://www.nytimes.com/search?query=fairvote https://www.washingtonpost.com/search/?query=fairvote
- Charity Navigator, the nonprofit rating entity, gives it a 100%, 4-star rating: https://www.charitynavigator.org/ein/541635649
This is just the tip of the iceberg. 173.66.181.85 ( talk) 17:28, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable pizza chain; doesn't satisfy WP:NORG or WP:SIGCOV. The current references are trivial and/or repeated from press releases and I can find nothing else. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. A bit early but a pretty clear SNOW conclusion. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 23:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. "Stats only" sources and a stats-only article with stats about a football club's 1985-1986 season. North8000 ( talk) 14:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Closing early. But to correct the nominator, I don't see that any editor who worked on this article is blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of wp:notability. The sources are just either announcements (e.g. on securing funding) or republishing of their press releases/self-bio. Same for the content of the article,. Creator is indeffed for COI promotional creation. North8000 ( talk) 14:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
sure!when asked if he has
at least two deep or significant sourcesas per the previous AfD. Jay 💬 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Some days ago, Wikilover3509 ( talk · contribs) tried to nominate this article for deletion, but ended up editing a previous nomination for a previous article at this title. Their rationale follows:
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, just press releases and blog posts.
This is mostly procedural on my part; I offer no opinion or further comment beyond noting that this has been tagged as, among other things, a possible WP:CORP failure since 2012. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
13:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous relist has not cleared things up.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
14:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB. Contested CSD. Mdann52 ( talk) 14:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Murree#History. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Well it has needed more sourcing since 2014, much of the content seems to be about other events, and there is no real; evidence of notable coverage.
As well as some of the sources being a bit iffy. Slatersteven ( talk) 15:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
19:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Owen×
☎
13:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
...Murree had played a small and insignificant role [in the Indian rebellion of 1857, and goes on to detail minor disorganized skirmishes. This seems appropriate to mention in the location's history as its local, minor participation in a major historical event (and it already is mentioned there), but it doesn't seem to be DUE for more than a sentence at Indian rebellion of 1857 and currently isn't mentioned there at all. signed, Rosguill talk 14:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 16:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Obscure businessman, lacks direct and in-depth coverage as a person (not as a business). Fails WP:GNG. FinnPanda ( talk) 12:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject of the article does not seem to be notable. The article has not been edited in 3 years and only contains two independent sources. PercyPigUK ( talk) 12:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 11:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There are a couple of marginal reviews of the band's album Nightmares, but not much else, nothing that suggests WP:BAND is satisfied. Clarityfiend ( talk) 11:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 14:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable cricket writer. Article was previously deleted in 2007, but there is still no evidence of the subject's notability. – Pee Jay 11:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Owen× ☎ 11:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The article has no non-dead sources and searches for "Union Stadium south africa" return real information (i.e. not maps or directions). The only search results on JSTOR are a university paper in Wisconsin and a local paper in Ohio, both of which are hardly reliable sources for a stadium in South Africa. For this reason, I feel the article does not meet general notability guidelines. WikipediaNMP ( talk) 09:17, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 11:06, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I took a some time to dig sources and find the reason why this article meets WP:NSONG but can't find either. The song topped a non notable chart and hasn't been covered significantly in reliable news sources. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Does not have references even though it is a biography, the only thing I could find were news outlets talking about his son, Demetrio Cortes Jr. TheNuggeteer ( talk) 08:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aydoh8 (
talk |
contribs)
09:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ARandomName123 ( talk)Ping me! 01:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
Nonnotable parody travel guide. I found only a single reasonable ref -
Altenmann
>talk
09:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
SourcesA book is presumed notable if it verifiably meets, through reliable sources, at least one of the following criteria:
- The book has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself. This can include published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries, bestseller lists, and reviews. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, flap copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the book.
The review notes: "Travel writers Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Stich are at it again. In their new guide to the fictional land of San Sombrero (San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC, 2006) they serve up a tantalising platter of tropicalizations, exoticized culinary fixations, superficial politico-economic analyses and a hefty dose of feel-good in-group reinforcement, all for 'the undiscerning traveller' (cover). But before you rush out to buy San Sombrero: A Land of Carnivals, Cocktails and Coups, you might take a moment to consider why this type of work is considered humorous. Although you may be tickled by its approach and impressed by its slick appearance, the guide is no less problematic for taking on a fictionalized topic."
The review notes: "This guide to a land whose main attraction is its lack of extradition treaties is the latest offering in the Jet Lag series which brought us the hilarious Molvania and Phaic Tan. I don't think it's quite as funny as its predecessors - though that may be because having chuckled my way through both I knew what to expect - but it's still a delight to read. ... Bad taste? Sure. That's the point."
The review notes: "If you're not taking a vacation this summer, then you're dreaming of taking one. Either way, you'll get a lot of laughs out of the Jetlag Travel Guide series. ... Of course, it is all these things — and more — making this sun drenched republic one of the most exciting travel destinations in all of Central America." Go to www.jetlagtravel.com and get a taste of these books for yourself. Just be prepared to laugh. A lot."
The review notes: "First there was Molvania, followed by Phaic Tan. Now, welcome to San Sombrero, a land of carnivals, cocktails and coups. The third Jetlag Travel Guide comes once again from the fertile minds of the Working Dog Productions team. Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Sitch have come up with the definitive guide to what you can expect if you go to South America. Well, sort of. San Sombrero, like Molvania and Phaic Tan, doesn't exist, but, in line with the first two, it can give you a definitive taste of a people and their culture. San Sombrero could be a smattering of Brazil mixed in with a pinch of Cuba and a dash of Mexico."
The review notes: "San Sombrero, which is a follow-up to previous guides on Molvania and Phaic Tan, is promoted as a "land of carnivals, cocktails and coups". The guide, which comes with a convincing array of photographs, describes San Sombrerans as essentially laid-back people, so much so that the inaugural marathon race had to be abandoned as most of the field were still chatting several hours after the official start."
The review notes: "This is a hilarious spoof travel guide to a fictional Central American country. Extremely lightheartedly, it satirises eco- and adventure-travellers and the way many guides gloss over negative aspects of a place. As well as ludicrous detailed descriptions of San Sombrero's culture, history and politics ('it boasts the only Nobel Peace Prize winner to be accused of war crimes'), there are useful symbols denoting everything from 'military installation' to 'illegal wildlife for sale'."
The review notes: "From the authors of Molvania and Phaic Tan comes San Sombrro: A Land Of Carnivals, Cocktails and Coups (Jetlag, $29.95). Santo Cilauro, Tom Gleisner and Rob Sitch explore Central America's most politically incorrect nation. Its attractions include "tropical charms, an exotic lifestyle and lack of extradition treaties". San Sombrro is a place where the church permits animal sacrifice, school canteens sell rum and its most famous war criminal won a Nobel Prize. There are useful chapters on cigarette brands, bull fighting, feminism and the telephone system. Totally hilarious - even the contributor profiles are funny. Available at all silly bookshops."
The result was delete. The keep arguments do not have policy behind them making this not as close as it appears Star Mississippi 16:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Upcoming comedian not notable for a page. References from unreliable sources and mostly trivial mentions Runmastery ( talk) 07:36, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Aydoh8 (
talk |
contribs)
09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per tagging for WP:G4 -- article previously deleted per discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chioma Rowland . — CactusWriter (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Being a wife of a notable person doesn't mean the wife should be notable. No! It's WP:INHERITED. Besides, celebrities can be influential but not notable. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep No good arguments provided to delete this article. Discussion of a merge can continue outside of an AfD if editors still think it might be worth doing. Malinaccier ( talk) 15:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
already have Li Keqiang Government & China under Xi Jinping Coddlebean ( talk) 08:59, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
the Central People's Government of China from 15 March 2013, when Premier Li Keqiang took office, until March 2023, while Xi Jinping–Li Keqiang Administration is
the administration of China from 2013 to 2023. Both articles list the State Council members, and do little else; it's not obvious that the articles should not be merged. (I agree that China under Xi Jinping is clearly very different). Walsh90210 ( talk) 01:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
details about the distribution of power between Xi and Licannot be included in Li Keqiang Government.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No independent significant coverage anywhere, seems to just be WP:TRIVIAL coverage online. Aydoh8 ( talk | contribs) 08:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP as well as WP:GNG. Twinkle1990 ( talk) 07:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable location within Mamaroneck, New York. Only thing I can find out about the place is that a 2021 trench collapse that killed a worker occurred there, but I doubt that alone would pass the notability criteria. Procyon117 ( talk) 15:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Censorship in Turkey. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable YouTuber Runmastery ( talk) 07:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ✗ plicit 14:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt ( talk) 02:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eastport–Kingsgate Border Crossing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:08, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
There's not a single reliable source online to put in this article, and it seems like nothing more than a small stub. NoobThreePointOh ( talk) 03:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Football at the 1998 Asian Games – Men's team squads#North Korea. Liz Read! Talk! 02:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Per WP:SNOW there is no chance this discussion will arrive at any other outcome. Thryduulf ( talk) 13:35, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This article describes social concerns about the exposure of drag to children as "hysteria," "moral panic," and "extremism." Regardless of whether one might be inclined to agree with such statements, there is not sufficient evidence to call one side of a very polarized political divide "hysterical." This article thus claims a seriously contested assertion to be fact, something which has a strong prohibition on it in WP:VOICE. JustAPoliticsNerd ( talk) 02:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I will note that sometimes an article is so Broken that deletion is the only way to fix it (or to put it another way, there is nothing worth saving), but this is not one such article. Slatersteven ( talk) 13:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
this is heading for a snow close. Slatersteven ( talk) 08:53, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Thank you to the editors who did their due diligence, looking for actual sources about this middle school and evaluating Chinese sources. When AFD works, it is because of contributions like yours. Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Pure vandalism, cross-wiki abuse, the article with the same name in Chinese Wikipedia was deleted by a sysop. Allervous ( talk) 02:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The block discussion is here. Here is a Google Translate of that discussion:
Extended content
|
---|
鸡景行 ( Discussion · Contributions · Log [Ban · Filter] · Global Account Information) zh:灵山县灵城第三中学 (Edit | Discussion | History | Links | Monitor | Log) Just making it up.
Discovered by: Kcx36 (Message) 17:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC) zh:Special:Diff/82824332/83166384, suspected to be imitating Zhemao. --Kcx36 (Message) 17:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
zh:User:鸡景行/钟娟章, seems to be pranking his teacher. --Kcx36 (Message) 17:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC) pages.dev is Cloudflare Pages. It is hard to believe that this is the official website of the school. --HeihaHeihaHa-Muggle... (Message) 17:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC) |
The result was redirect to List of Hindi films of 1977. I don't see a strict consensus for any outcome but this closure would accommodate the opinions of the most participants. I would have closed this AFD discussion as "No consensus" if the references had included page numbers, ensuring that the article subject was actually discussed in them, but just listing books doesn't give me confidence this is the case. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
fails general notability guideline. search only turns up a song of the same name and the phrase "kali raat". ltb d l ( talk) 01:17, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:13, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please review recently added sources to article to see if this satisfies the need for sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough significant coverage of this subject, an American rugby league footballer, to meet WP:GNG. My searches yielded a few trivial mentions. JTtheOG ( talk) 01:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to British Rail departmental locomotives. I see a consensus to retain the content here but move it to a different article and turn this page into a redirect. I hope an editor knowledgeable on the subject will undertake this project of merging this article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Wholly unsourced article since 2009 Danners430 ( talk) 16:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
22:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Are the two sources enough to establish notability? Are there more sources we are missing?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Malinaccier (
talk)
01:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, no consensus here yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
No significant and independent coverage. Northern Moonlight 00:42, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Jimmy Merchant. Liz Read! Talk! 00:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
I could find no secondary sources, ie reviews or commentary, about this book. Merge to Jimmy Merchant (as it is a memoir)? PARAKANYAA ( talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow editors to selectively merge any content that can be reliably sourced to the target article. A redirect with the history preserved under the redirect will allow the redirect to be undone if significant coverage in reliable sources is found in the future. Cunard ( talk) 08:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Participants have brought up some additional sources that would address the nominator's concerns. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NORG. Apart from a momentary controversy six years ago which was written up in the New York Times, the only independent coverage is from brief articles in local media, which per WP:AUD are not an indication of notability. Astaire ( talk) 00:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
The editorial notes: "You might not have heard of the Oregon Battle of the Books, but for kids from 37 public and private schools in Deschutes County, it’s a big deal, and it’s coming up soon. ... Students across the state get lists of books geared to the competition’s three divisions, third through fifth grades, sixth through eighth grades and high school. There are 16 books on each of the lists for the younger two groups, and a dozen on the one for high schools. ... So I hope the Battle of the Books draws not only confirmed readers but also kids who’ve never really discovered the pleasure that comes from reading."
The article notes: "OBOB was initiated in 2006 and modeled on Battle of the Books programs that have been operating in other states for up to 25 years. The first competitions in Oregon were during the 2007-08 school year. ... Each team comes up with a name (Read S'more, Moustache Winners and Slightly Radioactive Gummy Bears are just a few of this year's examples), and some wear team T-shirts or colors to their battles. Many use strategies such as dividing the required reading up amongst the team members to create subject matter experts, while others take extensive notes and get together after school to quiz one another."
The article notes: "Emotions ran high at the fifth annual Oregon Battle of the Books, a statewide reading and literacy competition for students grades 3 through 12 Saturday at Chemeketa Community College in Salem. The tournament, sponsored by the Oregon Association of School Libraries, was the culmination of nearly a year of preparation by dedicated students and librarians. Competitors were in three categories, third through fifth grade, sixth through eighth and ninth through 12th. Each group had a reading list of 16 books, from which questions were selected. In all, there were 45 student teams from both public and private schools throughout Oregon."
The article notes: "This year marks the first time that the popular reading competition, which made its name in middle and elementary schools across the state, has expanded to the high school level. During this weekend's regional competition at Springfield High School, The Bibliophiles will compete against winning teams from 12 high schools in Lane, Douglas and Coos counties. ... Most teams split the reading load of 16 books among their members, with each member becoming an "expert" on four or five books. Members of both The Bibliophiles and It's a Secret were required to participate for their honors literature course - but they insisted they would have taken part anyway."
The article notes: "Students read 12 books to get ready — from John Green’s “The Fault in Our Stars” to Gaby Rodriguez’s “The Pregnancy Project.” During the round-robin, “quiz bowl” type contest, the bookworms had to answer “In which book...?” and content questions. Teams huddled together, whispering excitedly to get the answer within 15 seconds. Their teammates mouthed the answers to each other in the audience."
The Oregonian and The Register-Guard are the largest and second largest newspapers in the American state of Oregon. These two sources, which provide significant coverage about the subject, meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Audience. Cunard ( talk) 09:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)The source's audience must also be considered. Significant coverage in media with an international, national, or at least regional audience (e.g., the biggest daily newspaper in any US state) is a strong indication of notability. Attention solely from local media (e.g., the weekly newspaper for a small town), or media of limited interest and circulation (e.g., a newsletter exclusively for people with a very unusual job), is not an indication of notability. At least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary.
The result was keep. Discussions about moving the article can occur on the article talk page.
The nominator, who has been active for just 2 weeks, is advised to acquire more editing experience and policy knowledge before nominating articles for AFD discussions. That's my opinion, not consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
It doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV because it's singularly sourced to meet WP:NOTABILITY. I have notability concerns for this article; it must either be deleted or moved to a general article that lists this play. I've looked on the news, Google, books, and scholars but couldn't find anything. Normanhunter2 ( talk) 00:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)