![]() |
The result was Draftify. I will draftify the article till more reviews come in and articles are made (non-admin closure) •Cyberwolf• talk? 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Future product without the requisite coverage outside of re-packaged announcements and other Churnalism. Suggest a move to draft space or redirect to Turtle_Beach_Corporation#Products_and_brands until such time as sourcing exists. PROD was contested, so we're here. Star Mississippi 23:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Diamond Creek Township, Chase County, Kansas. Owen× ☎ 14:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The first nomination really didn't go anywhere near the problem: there's no evidence this was ever anything but a post office that was put out of business by RFD. It's not even clear that the location given is where the post office was, since it's unlikely to have been in a cemetery. Most of the sources are old maps which are used to justify statements that they cannot support. I also had to prune out a great deal of padding in the form of a historical snapshot of the state. Mangoe ( talk) 23:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
it seems reasonable that this and Hymer, Kansas be merged into Diamond Creek Township, Chase County, Kansas, otherwise we'd still be putting about the same thing in the township article (q.v.). Alas that Valens 2011 is self-published and (patently) not expert-written.Diamond Creek, a township of Chase co., Kansas, Pop. 663. It contains Elmdale, Hymer, and Elk.
— Lippincott 1880, p. 572
There used to be a GNIS entry (with feature class "cem") for Elk Cemetery, by the way, which is probably how the coördinates got there.
Categories (++): (+)}}
The result was keep. Complex/ Rational 02:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable author failing GNG. Can find no significant coverage of this individual; at most he is mentioned in book reviews. The article relies on a basic directory entry and a vague link to the entire University of Leicester website because some of his books are there. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 23:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect to chip butty would be inapt as that article focuses on and is titled after a Commonwealth/UK-specific sandwich. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No reliable sources and unlikely to be any. The single citation appears to be from a Turkish blog post from 2016. Cabrils ( talk) 23:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 12:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Not enough sources/anyone talking about it. Heyandwhoa ( talk) 22:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, continuing the discussion on whether this should be a standalone article or merged with a target article (and there are several suggestions here)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see unanimity among those relying on policies and guidelines. Additional relists seem to garner no new opinions. Owen× ☎ 15:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson who doesn't satisfy any of WP:SIGCOV, WP:INDEPENDENT, or WP:SECONDARY. Article relies largely on materials that are either primary or unreliable. Does not pass WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sly Cooper#Major characters. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 12:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Doing a WP:BEFORE turned up nothing about the character in a significant capacity, heck most discussion if any is strictly about the games. Unless there's an angle I'm missing, it doesn't seem to be a notable character, let alone one with impact. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000. czar 22:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:SENSATIONAL. A case of missing white woman syndrome. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. There's a clear consensus against keeping the page as a standalone article, but views are split between Merge and Redirect. Discussion about which content, if any, is to be moved to the target can continue on the target's Talk page. Note: since International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war is a redir, the merge should proceed to its target. Owen× ☎ 15:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure there's enough here for a standalone article, it seems like it's scope can be covered by existing pages like 2023 Israel–Hamas war, International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, and Media coverage of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. This war is hugely important but not everything necessarily needs a spin off.
BuySomeApples ( talk) 22:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
not everything necessarily needs a spin off. gidonb ( talk) 10:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No indication that this system actually exists outside this article. The equivalent article was deleted on zhwiki for this reason. MSG17 ( talk) 22:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination, due to low participation. Complex/ Rational 03:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable and defunct non-profit. Orphaned for nearly a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on the sources presented would be appreciated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 22:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated without proper sourcing. None of the other language versions have better sourcing. Lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in Hindi or other languages can’t access, in which case I’m happy to withdraw this. Mccapra ( talk) 22:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Since the two relists garnered no new participation, I see no point in a third relist. Any editor is welcome to re-nominate this in six months. Owen× ☎ 15:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBLP. Very few sources, with the existing sources not being sufficient to establish notability (either being sources that are not independent of the subject or simply include the subject in a list of people killed).
There was previously an attempt by User:Zero0000 to speedily delete the page, but the author User:Eladkarmel contested the nomination. The argument for deletion points to the only sourcing being inevitable press releases mentioning the subject's death and argues that the page is a WP:MEMORIAL. In contesting this, the author made an argument against deletion by noting that the article exists in 5 languages (which counts English) and notes the subject's rank as a colonel. I am not persuaded by that counterargument. As the speedy deletion was contested without any prospect of the notability concerns being addressed, I am nominating this page at AfD as the next step per WP:DPAFD.
Vanilla Wizard 💙 23:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider additional sources in other languages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Singha Durbar (TV series). Star Mississippi 16:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
BLP which does not satisfy WP:GNG, WP:NBLP or WP:NACTOR; Google search for additional refs produces few sources outside of social media or promotional materials. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 17:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Actively being edited so would prefer not to close as soft-delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database record | 1. "Bhintuna Joshi". lensnepal. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Brief promo bio | 2. ^ "Nalekha Chithi 2013". Kathmandu Craze. 14 January 2024. |
Name mention, "...and supporting actors like Bhintuna Joshi and Alok Thapa as..." | 3. ^ "Singhadurbar tv series". thehimalayantimes. 14 January 2024. |
Database record | 4. ^ "Bhintuna Joshi Bio". Film Development Board Nepal. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Name mention, "Karma Shakya and Bhintuna Joshi are seen in..." | 5. ^ "चलचित्र 'भ्रम'को ट्रेलर". artistkhabar. 24 November 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Brief promo for films, subject is quoted. Fails WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV | 6. ^ "कर्मासँगको रोमान्समा भिन्तुनाले भुलिन् पुसको जाडो". suvadin.com. 7 January 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Q&A style interview | 7. ^ "The new face of politics on screen". thehimalayantimes.com. 18 September 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2024. |
Promo for music video | 8. ^ "यः मदन दाइ म्यूजिक भिडियो सार्वजनिक". newsnepa.com. Retrieved 25 January 2024. |
Name mention in list, "Similarly, Hisila Maharjan, Bhintuna Joshi, Rozina Suwal, Annapurnaswari Shrestha and Rajni Khadgi were the winners on the women's side." | 9. ^ "'नेवा: सुपरस्टार सिरपा' का विजेतालाई पुरस्कार वितरण". www.ratopati.com. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Name mentions in awards show recap, fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 10. ^ "Page 3 Nepalbhasha People's Choice Awards concludes". myrepublica.com. Retrieved 15 January 2024. |
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:N. An article with almost no reliable sources on a minor character. I couldn't find many reliable sources on "Harry Brighton". JooneBug37 ( talk) 21:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Conyo14 ( talk) 03:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn Just a collection of records that are kept off site at the team's website, a primary source, a pretty clear violation of
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information at 3. Excessive listings of unexplained statistics.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish·
growths)
21:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 15:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. No obvious WP:ATD. No consensus at 2022 AfD. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 08:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Epstein's associates list very similar scope to that article which was deleted for the potential of serious BLP issues. This document release can easily be covered in the main Epstein article. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
people feel sensitively about members of the Royal and Clinton families....This has absolutely nothing to do with sensitivity about certain people. This has to do with BLPs. O3000, Ret. ( talk) 17:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 22:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, or that there is an WP:ATD. 2009 AfD resulted in no consensus but standards were significantly lower then. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
It's difficult to justify this article staying any longer, about an artist in residence programme in Slovenia. It's difficult enough to find out what Villa Flora is - a search online only brings up a hotel. Article has been tagged as lacking notability since 2014, with no improvement. Sionk ( talk) 19:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found for this subject to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NSEASONS. Sources present are all short and routine game recaps. Open to a WP:ATD but I don't see any merge/redirect targets. Let'srun ( talk) 19:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chemnitz#Culture and sights. RL0919 ( talk) 19:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 19:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sysax Multi Server. RL0919 ( talk) 19:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 19:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint Kitts and Nevis national football team#CONCACAF Gold Cup. RL0919 ( talk) 19:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, no content at CONCACAF Gold Cup that would make this an appropriate WP:BLAR candidate. Note that the article itself barely even has any information actually about St Kitts and Nevis's involvement. Searching online, coverage is limited to match announcements and reports that don't offer much in the way of significant coverage of this team's participation in the CONCACAF Gold Cup. signed, Rosguill talk 18:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Elf on the Shelf. RL0919 ( talk) 19:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The awards aren't enough to meet biographic notability and it's not clear she's independently notable of her company or its famous product. A redirect to Elf on the Shelf, where her book has also been redirected and which most of the sources are actually about would be fine Star Mississippi 16:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional conversation regarding
WP:1E/
WP:BLP1E would be helpful in establishing a firmer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
18:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete per WP:BLP1E. RL0919 ( talk) 19:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This article fails Wikipedia's guideline on living persons who are notable for only one event. There's been no sustained coverage of this story as of yet, and it's too soon for an article; Wikipedia is not a news site. Additionally, although this is not an attack page and it states clearly that the charges were dropped, we should be wary of an article containing serious allegations involving child exploitation, anti-semitism, and bomb threats. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 18:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of association football players who died during their careers. czar 22:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This footballer unfortunately seems like a failure of WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:ONEEVENT. Being mentioned without a link in List of association football players who died during their careers should probably be enough. Geschichte ( talk) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 17:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 16:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable voice actor. This article was previously deleted when the only citation was to IMDb. Now, almost all of the citations are to behindthevoiceactors.com, which appears to contain user-generated content. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 16:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to David Pratt (Scottish journalist), without prejudice to early recreation if and when new sources support that. A reasonable ATD, well supported by the views expressed here. Owen× ☎ 16:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I do not believe that the content of this article is notable per Wikipedia:Notability (books), as there are only 2 potentially reliable sources; RFC: Electronic Intifada is depreciated. As I do not believe that both sources can be counted towards the notability requirement, and as the original editor is unavailable, I would suggest a deletion.
Additionally, the use of RFC: Electronic Intifada by an author who does not appear to be an authority in their respective field as the primary source for the content of the book, meaning that the content cannot be sourced well. FortunateSons ( talk) 16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Apopka, Florida. Star Mississippi 16:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The article does not pass NOTNEWS and onlY seems to have one thing that got coverage. No SIGCOV Grahaml35 ( talk) 14:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Avaya. ✗ plicit 02:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Old software almost exclusively cited to its vendor. Can't find much online. BrigadierG ( talk) 13:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotional not notable company's page; clear COI; not reliable sources (in the article on via online search) Gavrover ( talk) 11:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The book notes: "奥克斯1989年进入电表制造业,随之相继研制出环网柜、变压 器开关柜、箱式变电站等产品,全面进入电力产业。1994年涉足家 电制造业,随之相继研制出商用冰箱、空调、小家电等产品,全面 进入家电产业。2002年进入手机制造业,随之相继研制出GSM、 CDMA等产品。2002年5月进入移动通讯产业,成为国内新兴的移 动通讯终端设备的专业制造商。"
From Google Translate: "Oaks entered the electric meter manufacturing industry in 1989, and subsequently developed ring main unit cabinets, transformer switch cabinets, box-type substations and other products, fully entering the power industry. In 1994, it got involved in the home appliance manufacturing industry, and subsequently developed commercial refrigerators, air conditioners, small household appliances and other products, fully entering the home appliance industry. In 2002, it entered the mobile phone manufacturing industry and subsequently developed GSM, CDMA and other products. In May 2002, it entered the mobile communications industry and became an emerging professional manufacturer of mobile communications terminal equipment in China."
The article notes: "奧克斯集團創立于1986年,以家用電器等起家后跨界到地產、醫療健康、金融等。為了在醫療大健康領域發展,集團旗下上市公司三星電氣(11.710, -0.04, -0.34%)在2015年更名為三星醫療,形成醫療服務與電力產品雙主業格局,醫療服務被視為拉動公司未來業務發展與業績提升的主要引擎。... 資料顯示,奧克斯集團進軍大健康產業先后掛牌浙江大學明州醫院、新建南昌大學附屬撫州醫院、設立醫療投資管理公司、成立醫療並購基金等。"
From Google Translate: "AUX was founded in 1986. It started with household appliances and then crossed over to real estate, medical health, finance, etc. In order to develop in the field of medical health, the group's listed company Samsung Electric (11.710, -0.04, -0.34%) changed its name to Samsung Medical in 2015, forming a dual-main business structure of medical services and power products. Medical services are regarded as driving the company The main engine for future business development and performance improvement. ... Data shows that AUX has entered the big health industry and has successively listed Zhejiang University Mingzhou Hospital, newly built Nanchang University Affiliated Fuzhou Hospital, established a medical investment management company, established a medical M&A fund, etc."
The book notes: "宁波奥克斯集团是我国家电行业的一匹黑马,是机电行业成功运用多种营销战略开 拓市场的一把利剑,是由单一化向多元化扩展的精英,更是中国民营企业快速崛起的一个典范。从四明山下的一个牛棚起家到当今中国制造业的新秀,奥克斯15年的时间完成 了跨越1000倍的成长历程。解读奥克斯所创造的令人难以置信的奇迹,不仅可以更好 地解读浙江民营经济迅速发展之谜,更可以看到奥克斯对于事件营销的过程中战略设计 的特点和创新。"
From Google Translate: "Ningbo AUX is a dark horse in my country's home appliance industry. It is a sharp sword in the electromechanical industry that successfully uses various marketing strategies to open up the market. It is an elite that expands from singleness to diversification. It is also a model of the rapid rise of China's private enterprises. From a bullpen at the foot of Siming Mountain to a rising star in China's manufacturing industry today, AUX has completed a growth process that exceeds 1,000 times in 15 years. Interpreting the incredible miracles created by AUX can not only better understand the mystery of the rapid development of Zhejiang's private economy, but also see the characteristics and innovations of AUX's strategic design in the process of event marketing."
The book notes: "奥克斯集团的总部在浙江宁波。随着公司的发展,人越来越 多,非本地员工的比例也越来越大,在众多非本地员工中以四川 人和湖南人为主。要想让这么多人全力以赴地工作,首先要满足 员工的基本生活。俗话说:民以食为天。可偏偏四川人、湖南人 的口味和宁波人有很大的差异。为了让四川和湖南籍的员工吃得 好,公司管理层要求食堂聘请川菜师傅,增加川菜的比重。可 是,这一要求与食堂的利益无绝对联系,食堂的管理人员因此毫 不重视,一拖再拖。奥克斯集团的管理层并没有马上强制执行自 己的决定,而是采取了非常巧妙的方法。"
From Google Translate: "Oaks Group is headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang. With the development of the company, there are more and more people, and the proportion of non-local employees is also increasing. Among the many non-local employees, Sichuan and Hunan people are the main ones. If you want so many people to work with all their strength, you must first meet the basic needs of employees. As the saying goes: Food is the most important thing for people. But the tastes of Sichuan and Hunan people are very different from those of Ningbo people. In order to allow Sichuan and Hunan employees to eat well, the company management requires the canteen to hire Sichuan cuisine chefs to increase the proportion of Sichuan cuisine. However, this request has no absolute connection with the interests of the canteen, so the management of the canteen does not pay attention to it and delays it again and again. The management of Oaks Group did not immediately enforce its decision, but adopted a very clever approach."
The article notes: "Founded in 1986, Aux Group's major products include home and commercial aircons and other household appliances. It had operating income of CNY86 billion (USD12.4 billion) last year."
The article notes: "Aux Group, one of China's top 500 enterprises, has made an entry into Malaysia's consumer electrical market through a collaboration with a local partner. ... Aux Group was established in 1986, and today its activities span over several industries covering home appliances, electrical equipment, medical equipment and services, real estate and investment. Its air conditioners is ranked the number three most popular brand in China and was the exclusive air conditioning supplier to the 19th Asian 2022 Hangzhou Games."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss and evaluate the sourcing Cunard identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 17:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, independent secondary coverage appears to be nonexistent, taking into account that Hui is a BBC employee. Having received a British Empire Medal does not appear to be a strong case for WP:ANYBIO, particularly in the absence of any independent biographical coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator, with no !votes for any other outcome. Complex/ Rational 17:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for
WP:N. No obvious
WP:ATD. This has been in
CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.
Boleyn (
talk)
15:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. All of the Delete views are solidly anchored in policy, while none of the Keep views are. As for AI-authored views, I don't have strong feelings either way, but it behooves you to train your Large Language Model on our policies and guidelines if you want the resulting text to be taken seriously. Owen× ☎ 16:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman, fails WP:NBIO. Draftified and creator was asked not to return it to mainspace without AFC review. Previously deleted six times and salted at Kumar Parakala, now 4th time at AfD. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be very helpful to display links to previous AFDs. Also useful would be an evaluation to the sources mentioned in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AN article with this long of a history needs more policy-based input please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 23:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. No obvious WP:ATD. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for WP:NPRODUCT or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to Richard Li, though it might unbalance that article. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 15:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. With the lack of sourcing, I wouldn't propose a merge, but there could be redirect targets such as Chunsoft as a possible WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was Delete. JBW ( talk) 22:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Publications are not properly focused on the company, neither they are reliable enough to grant meeting NCORP criteria Gavrover ( talk) 11:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article for a non-notable organization. An earlier PROD was removed because of "many search hits"--well, there may be many hits, but the ones that might look helpful are just really short mentions ( [21], [22], [23]), besides a ton of just websites and non-neutral outfits. Here is the book listed in the article: a single mention; here is the LA Times article: a single mention with a brief appositive. There is no proper coverage for notability.
The article itself--well, there's a ton of name dropping, a bunch of organizational links, and an audacious claims, "CSC helped pass two new laws in California," linked to their own website. The subject does not meet our standards. Drmies ( talk) 14:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability for this intersection Fram ( talk) 14:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, sources found, unless @ QuietHere: objects Mach61 ( talk) 20:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail NALBUM. A search pulled up one Billboard review (note that the allmusic rating has no attached review) but nothing else. AfDing on the off chance someone has access to an offline source I don't Mach61 ( talk) 14:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nine Network#Local programs. IP redirected without comment; restoring. No need to take this back to AfD unless they continue to edit war about it. (non-admin closure) Nate • ( chatter) 18:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG, multiple contested BLARS, I could only find passing mentions. Suggesting reverting to redirect. Just i yaya 14:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Sources are about the film see no reason to have separate article for soundtrack.Music is not a hit. Tame Rhino ( talk) 13:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 13:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 20:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Another genealogical entry, the purpose of which appears to be showing whom the subject married and to whom she gave birth. Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. Surtsicna ( talk) 12:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
13:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Appears to have reached WP:HEY. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This was already deleted via AFD in 2020, and I see little significant coverage since then to suggest the situation has changed. The "best" sources in the article seem to be along the lines of [25], which is both a tabloid and also just an interview so not really in depth secondary significant coverage. — Amakuru ( talk) 10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn after article was nicely amended ( non-admin closure). Ouro ( blah blah) 16:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for
WP:MUSICBIO or
WP:GNG. Merge/redirect or redirect to author is a possible
WP:ATD. This has been in
CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.
Boleyn (
talk)
10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. I couldn't find relevant sources in Spanish or English. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. There doesn't seem to be a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 10:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 1. "Abu-'l-Qāsim Ibn-Aḥmad Ibn-Alī Ibn-Ibrahīm az- Zaiyānī et Octave Victor Houdas, Le Maroc de 1631 à 1812 extrait de l'ouvrage intitulé Ettordjemân elmoʻarib ʻan douel elmachriq ou ʻlmaghrib, Octave Victor Houdas, 1886". archive.wikiwix.com. Retrieved 2024-01-13. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Maximilien Antoine Cyprien Henri Poisson de La Martinière et Napoléon Lacroix, Documents pour servir à l'étude du Nord Ouest africain: Le sud-ouest algérien et les régions limitrophes. Figuig. L'oued Guir. L'oued Saoura, Gouvernement général de l'Algérie, Service des affaires indigènes, 1896. p. 36. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "Comer Plummer III, Empire of Clay: The Reign of Moulay Ismail, Sultan of Morocco (1672-1727), Lulu Publishing Services, 2020". archive.wikiwix.com. p. 336. Retrieved 2024-01-13. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 1. The Conversos and Moriscos in Late Medieval Spain and Beyond: Volume 2. The Morisco Issue. BRILL. 2012-06-22. ISBN 978-90-04-22860-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 2. ^ Haedo, Diego de; Haëdo, Diego de (1881). Histoire des rois d'Alger (in French). A. Jourdan. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 3. ^ Friedman, Ellen G. (1983). Spanish Captives in North Africa in the Early Modern Age. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-09380-8. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 4. ^ Collado, Manuel Danvila y (1889). La expulsión de los moriscos españoles: conferencias pronunciadas en el Ateneo de Madrid (in Spanish). Librería de Fernando Fé. |
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Two indifferent references fails to show any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Its sad you never engage or even want to answer my simple question, thus proving your biasness on African content! More reasons to dicolonise Wikipedia with such editos — Preceding unsigned comment added by MollelwaFahaSaBasotho ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 08:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. No obvious WP:ATD, though there are pages on some of its artists. Boleyn ( talk) 08:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to BBC Radio Ulster. Star Mississippi 04:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No independent sources that can establish notability can be found CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 13:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient coverage of this field hockey player to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that that up in my searches was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Subic Broadcasting Corporation#Stations. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient depth Star Mississippi 04:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable sources that could support the subject's notability. Israel's Son 11:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 09:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient independent coverage of the subject – a Scottish women's field hockey player – to meet WP:GNG. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this short piece from The Edinburgh Reporter with maybe five sentences of coverage, most of which is just repeating her own words. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND. Looked online and wasn't able to find anything that meets the guidelines for passing the SNS here. Also checked the newspaper archives and wasn't able to find anything. I will admit it might be hard with the band name to locate suitable material, if someone finds something obvious I missed please ping me so I can retract the nomination. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Mic Mag | ~ Magazine is also a record label. It appears to have been a small publication at first and is not also a label | ~ If a label is writing articles then I'm not sure if it can really be reliable anymore | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Broadway World | ~ I wasn't able to figure out if this outlet was independent or just a PR outlet with a few legit reviews mixed in. | ~ Came out one day before the Mic Mag article and both read very promotional | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Audio Angest | ? Site is really just one man Ian Roth | ? Site is hosted on substack and the article came out on the same day as the Broadway World article | ![]() |
? Unknown |
buzz-music.com | ~ Not sure if everything on the site is user submitted or influenced | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
punkrocks.co.uk | ~ No editorial policy page, articles mostly appear to be authored by one person Oscar Manners | ~ Lack of editorial structure makes it hard to figure out if this is reliable. Also this article was released on the same day as all the others | ~ Article is quite short compared to the others, coverage is only about them but there isn't much there/ | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Delete per nominator; they don't yet meet the notability criteria. Maybe it's just too soon, but the sources that currently exist are dodgy. JSFarman ( talk) 19:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. An ATD can be considered editorially. Star Mississippi 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Topic has little to no WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The article is an unreferenced stub that has changed little since it was created more than a decade ago. A search turned up Hellebuyck, Chuck (2008). Programming The Basic Atom Microcontroller. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-4404-7976-2., which is a self-published book, and Kelemen, Michal; et al. (2014). "Rapid Control Prototyping of Embedded Systems Based on Microcontroller". Procedia Engineering. 96: 215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.146. which is a short description in a small, defunct engineering journal. I suggest we delete. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 01:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
01:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas. Complex/ Rational 17:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This is much the same situation as Appanoose, Kansas: a short-lived post office in the mid-1800s, replaced by a township. The situation is complicated by a flood of false Ghits, as there is also a Greenwood County in the eastern part of the state, and the community center mentioned is actually over near/in Kansas City. The church is there, though, with its cemetery, and that's all there is to the place presently. Again, there is no evidence for anything otehr than a vague locale. Mangoe ( talk) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I can find no Greenwood other than the township in Franklin in the history books. Andreas 1883 only has the township (on p.621), for example. Presumably people will want to disambiguate Greenwood County, Kansas, Greenwood Township, Phillips County, Kansas, and Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas.Greenwood; village in Quincy Township, Greenwood County.
Greenwood; station on St. Louis and San Francisco Railway, in Twin Grove Township, Greenwood County; altitude, 991 feet.
Greenwood; southeast county […]
Greenwood; township in Franklin County; area, 30 square miles; population, 712.
Greenwood; township in Phllips County; area, 36 square miles; population, 303.
— Gannett 1898, pp. 101–102
Once again we are victim of the "A post office implies a village/town; so a defunct post office with no town implies a ghost town." double fallacy on the parts of people who don't know how post offices and townships worked. There is zero evidence beyond what the one source actually says, which is that this is a post office that used to be run by the Sac and Fox Agency Stage Company. Another source confirms that it was run by postmaster Elijah S. Buckner and changed names in 1861.
Finally, returning to Andreas 1883, p. 621 we find that the Sac and Fox reservation in Franklin County was moved to Osage County in 1863, which is why the post office changed, so that Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas could be settled in the reservation's place in 1863 and organized in 1865.
It's an old Indian agency post office, that got renamed per the Greenwood Township. Ironically, Sac and Fox#History skips over Kansas in the 1850s and 1860s entirely without a mention, and goes straight to Iowa.
The result was redirect to Fonterra. Given the disruption during the AFD, I will E/C the redirect Star Mississippi 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Though this product is covered in scientific papers, this does not indicate its notability. In line with the guidelines at WP:PRODUCTS an article about a product should have significant coverage in secondary sources to indicate notability. A search for specifically "Probiotic Probio DR10" or for the shorter phrase "Probio DR10" returns no results from either google books or google scholar. DR10 is covered, as cited, in research papers, but this coverage is not significant. Therefore I propose that the article be turned into a redirect either to the company that created the product Fonterra or to the more general article probiotic. 🌿MtBotany ( talk) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Could not find extensive indepth coverage, a mere 5 gnews hits which are mainly small mentions. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Page was turned down two times in page review and then put to mainspace anyways by the article's creator. Ziad as a squash player has no significant coverage specific to them; beside passing mentions in other articles. They are currently ranked 182 by the PSA (squash tour), which is also not a notable ranking. Their current rankings mean they are limited in the tournaments they may enter. On the PSA website on Ziad Sakr's which lists news and video specific to the player no listings are specific to Ziad Sakr. On the Wiki page there listed notable win in 2012 is the British Open which was for the U-13 category. A junior tournament win of that caliber while impressive is not enough to meet notability requirements. KeepItGoingForward ( talk) 01:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep -Thank you for your comments; I appreciate the time you are taking to address them. Let's begin by addressing your concerns. The British Junior Open stands as one of the biggest and most prestigious tournaments in squash juniors' careers. Winning it is akin to securing a world championship. Moreover, this individual has clinched multiple significant international titles, including the Arabian Championship three times with the Egyptian national team and the 17th national championship for Trinity College. Since squash lacks a standardized league, the College Squash National Championship holds immense importance. For aspiring professional squash players, winning it is a pivotal goal, attracting sponsors and providing an advantage for promoters to grant access to wild cards and satellite tournaments in the professional circuit, a crucial step in starting a professional career.
Regarding the second point, Ziad Sakr moved from 800 to 182 in the rankings within a year. I respectfully disagree with your assertion that this is not notable. Achieving such a feat—climbing over 500 places in under 12 months at the beginning of a professional squash career—is a commendable and significant accomplishment. Ziad now qualifies to compete in major tournaments, and within the squash community, he is well-known. After conducting an interview with him, I am convinced he deserves to have a Wikipedia page so more people can learn about his achievements.
This has nothing to do with promotion, as you said. I am trying to give him the recognition he deserves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namexre ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting we really need to hear from more than 2 editors on this situation. Just a reminder that each edito can cast a single bolded "vote" so please do not post votes repeatedly. I might come back and hat some of these tangent discussions. I think they would discourage editors from joining in the conversation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in BEFORE are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 1. Metcalfe, Alex (2014-03-11). Muslims of Medieval Italy. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-8843-2. |
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 2. ^ Barbera, Henry. The Military Factor in Social Change Vol. 2. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-3781-1. |
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 3. ^ Barbera, Henry (1994). Medieval Sicily: The First Absolute State. Legas. ISBN 978-1-881901-05-1. |
// Timothy :: talk 03:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Calpe#History. seems to have slightly more consensus than Barbary slave trade. That can be fine tuned when the merge is performed as target is not an admin decision Star Mississippi 03:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV. Article event took place in 1637, book covers 1735-1830, has one sentence mention | 1. Bekkaoui, K. (2010-11-24). White Women Captives in North Africa: Narratives of Enslavement, 1735-1830. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-230-29449-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a one sentence mention | 2. ^ Street, Lucie (1986). An Uncommon Sailor: A Portrait of Admiral Sir William Penn, English Naval Supremacy. Kensal Press. ISBN 978-0-946041-47-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a one sentence mention | 3. ^ Friedman, Ellen G. (1983). Spanish Captives in North Africa in the Early Modern Age. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-09380-8. |
Fails SIGCOV, again a mention, nothing about the event | 4. ^ Hershenzon, Daniel (2018-08-01). The Captive Sea: Slavery, Communication, and Commerce in Early Modern Spain and the Mediterranean. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-9536-8. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 09:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Moved to draft but brought back into mainspace by the creator, this article lacks in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in Bengali or other languages I can’t access, but on present showing it’s not notable. Mccapra ( talk) 03:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 09:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This biography of an Olympic athlete was created by Lugnuts under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only references are two database entries.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced footballer BLP which fails WP:GNG. All I found were passing mentions of the subject ( 2018, 2020, 2022, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Munchkin#Welfare concerns or another section thereof Star Mississippi 03:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
WP:Notability (breeds) requires recognition from a major registry which the Bambino currently lacks (it's only experimental). There are many Munchkin derived breeds and I do not believe that they meet notability without the recognition as there's nothing special about them, other issues in the article include poor sources such as generic pet care websites and many of the references are about the Munchkin itself (as health issues and legal issues relate to the breed) To add on to notability issues the breed doesn't even seem to be mentioned on TICA's website. Have mentioned deletion on Wikiproject Cats too. Traumnovelle ( talk) 02:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:NSPORT; in Korean, when searched there are no significant articles covering their career. Few games on record. toobigtokale ( talk) 01:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. However if an editor is aware of a way to keep it current and helpful in a manner complementary to the existing seasonal ones, happy to provide it as a draft. Star Mississippi 03:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTSTATS, WP:V and possibly WP:BLP. In general, lists of "current" things are of dubious notability, because they will, in all likelihood, become empty at some point in the future (see the recent USFL AfD, for example).
This is a largely unreferenced list of living people which is terminally out of date. Some of the sublists haven't been updated since 2015. The page is a collection of career statistics which lack context, and it's unclear how the numbers are derived (e.g. do they include stats from multiple NASCAR series?) They may even be original calculations. Even if the list were well-referenced and updated regularly, it's unclear why the career statistics of this WP:CROSSCAT of drivers (i.e. currently active in any NASCAR series) are notable.
Actually current and verifiable information about the current roster of NASCAR drivers can be found on the per-season pages, such as 2023 NASCAR Cup Series. Because these pages refer to specific years, we can be assured that notability will persist indefinitely.
No consensus to delete last summer, but no compelling arguments to keep, either. pburka ( talk) 00:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Draftify. I will draftify the article till more reviews come in and articles are made (non-admin closure) •Cyberwolf• talk? 00:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Future product without the requisite coverage outside of re-packaged announcements and other Churnalism. Suggest a move to draft space or redirect to Turtle_Beach_Corporation#Products_and_brands until such time as sourcing exists. PROD was contested, so we're here. Star Mississippi 23:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Diamond Creek Township, Chase County, Kansas. Owen× ☎ 14:58, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The first nomination really didn't go anywhere near the problem: there's no evidence this was ever anything but a post office that was put out of business by RFD. It's not even clear that the location given is where the post office was, since it's unlikely to have been in a cemetery. Most of the sources are old maps which are used to justify statements that they cannot support. I also had to prune out a great deal of padding in the form of a historical snapshot of the state. Mangoe ( talk) 23:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
it seems reasonable that this and Hymer, Kansas be merged into Diamond Creek Township, Chase County, Kansas, otherwise we'd still be putting about the same thing in the township article (q.v.). Alas that Valens 2011 is self-published and (patently) not expert-written.Diamond Creek, a township of Chase co., Kansas, Pop. 663. It contains Elmdale, Hymer, and Elk.
— Lippincott 1880, p. 572
There used to be a GNIS entry (with feature class "cem") for Elk Cemetery, by the way, which is probably how the coördinates got there.
Categories (++): (+)}}
The result was keep. Complex/ Rational 02:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable author failing GNG. Can find no significant coverage of this individual; at most he is mentioned in book reviews. The article relies on a basic directory entry and a vague link to the entire University of Leicester website because some of his books are there. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 23:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirect to chip butty would be inapt as that article focuses on and is titled after a Commonwealth/UK-specific sandwich. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:21, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No reliable sources and unlikely to be any. The single citation appears to be from a Turkish blog post from 2016. Cabrils ( talk) 23:23, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 12:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Not enough sources/anyone talking about it. Heyandwhoa ( talk) 22:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, continuing the discussion on whether this should be a standalone article or merged with a target article (and there are several suggestions here)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see unanimity among those relying on policies and guidelines. Additional relists seem to garner no new opinions. Owen× ☎ 15:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessperson who doesn't satisfy any of WP:SIGCOV, WP:INDEPENDENT, or WP:SECONDARY. Article relies largely on materials that are either primary or unreliable. Does not pass WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 22:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found for this subject to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun ( talk) 22:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Sly Cooper#Major characters. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 12:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Doing a WP:BEFORE turned up nothing about the character in a significant capacity, heck most discussion if any is strictly about the games. Unless there's an angle I'm missing, it doesn't seem to be a notable character, let alone one with impact. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of solved missing person cases: post-2000. czar 22:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:SENSATIONAL. A case of missing white woman syndrome. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 22:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to International reactions to the Israel–Hamas war. There's a clear consensus against keeping the page as a standalone article, but views are split between Merge and Redirect. Discussion about which content, if any, is to be moved to the target can continue on the target's Talk page. Note: since International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war is a redir, the merge should proceed to its target. Owen× ☎ 15:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure there's enough here for a standalone article, it seems like it's scope can be covered by existing pages like 2023 Israel–Hamas war, International reactions to the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, and Media coverage of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. This war is hugely important but not everything necessarily needs a spin off.
BuySomeApples ( talk) 22:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
not everything necessarily needs a spin off. gidonb ( talk) 10:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No indication that this system actually exists outside this article. The equivalent article was deleted on zhwiki for this reason. MSG17 ( talk) 22:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination, due to low participation. Complex/ Rational 03:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable and defunct non-profit. Orphaned for nearly a decade. PepperBeast (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Further thoughts on the sources presented would be appreciated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 22:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated without proper sourcing. None of the other language versions have better sourcing. Lack of in depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in Hindi or other languages can’t access, in which case I’m happy to withdraw this. Mccapra ( talk) 22:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Since the two relists garnered no new participation, I see no point in a third relist. Any editor is welcome to re-nominate this in six months. Owen× ☎ 15:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBLP. Very few sources, with the existing sources not being sufficient to establish notability (either being sources that are not independent of the subject or simply include the subject in a list of people killed).
There was previously an attempt by User:Zero0000 to speedily delete the page, but the author User:Eladkarmel contested the nomination. The argument for deletion points to the only sourcing being inevitable press releases mentioning the subject's death and argues that the page is a WP:MEMORIAL. In contesting this, the author made an argument against deletion by noting that the article exists in 5 languages (which counts English) and notes the subject's rank as a colonel. I am not persuaded by that counterargument. As the speedy deletion was contested without any prospect of the notability concerns being addressed, I am nominating this page at AfD as the next step per WP:DPAFD.
Vanilla Wizard 💙 23:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider additional sources in other languages.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Singha Durbar (TV series). Star Mississippi 16:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
BLP which does not satisfy WP:GNG, WP:NBLP or WP:NACTOR; Google search for additional refs produces few sources outside of social media or promotional materials. Sims2aholic8 ( talk) 17:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Actively being edited so would prefer not to close as soft-delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
21:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Database record | 1. "Bhintuna Joshi". lensnepal. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Brief promo bio | 2. ^ "Nalekha Chithi 2013". Kathmandu Craze. 14 January 2024. |
Name mention, "...and supporting actors like Bhintuna Joshi and Alok Thapa as..." | 3. ^ "Singhadurbar tv series". thehimalayantimes. 14 January 2024. |
Database record | 4. ^ "Bhintuna Joshi Bio". Film Development Board Nepal. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Name mention, "Karma Shakya and Bhintuna Joshi are seen in..." | 5. ^ "चलचित्र 'भ्रम'को ट्रेलर". artistkhabar. 24 November 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Brief promo for films, subject is quoted. Fails WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV | 6. ^ "कर्मासँगको रोमान्समा भिन्तुनाले भुलिन् पुसको जाडो". suvadin.com. 7 January 2017. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Q&A style interview | 7. ^ "The new face of politics on screen". thehimalayantimes.com. 18 September 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2024. |
Promo for music video | 8. ^ "यः मदन दाइ म्यूजिक भिडियो सार्वजनिक". newsnepa.com. Retrieved 25 January 2024. |
Name mention in list, "Similarly, Hisila Maharjan, Bhintuna Joshi, Rozina Suwal, Annapurnaswari Shrestha and Rajni Khadgi were the winners on the women's side." | 9. ^ "'नेवा: सुपरस्टार सिरपा' का विजेतालाई पुरस्कार वितरण". www.ratopati.com. Retrieved 14 January 2024. |
Name mentions in awards show recap, fails WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 10. ^ "Page 3 Nepalbhasha People's Choice Awards concludes". myrepublica.com. Retrieved 15 January 2024. |
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:N. An article with almost no reliable sources on a minor character. I couldn't find many reliable sources on "Harry Brighton". JooneBug37 ( talk) 21:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Conyo14 ( talk) 03:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn Just a collection of records that are kept off site at the team's website, a primary source, a pretty clear violation of
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information at 3. Excessive listings of unexplained statistics.
microbiologyMarcus (
petri dish·
growths)
21:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 15:37, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. No obvious WP:ATD. No consensus at 2022 AfD. Boleyn ( talk) 20:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) asilvering ( talk) 08:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:34, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Epstein's associates list very similar scope to that article which was deleted for the potential of serious BLP issues. This document release can easily be covered in the main Epstein article. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 20:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
people feel sensitively about members of the Royal and Clinton families....This has absolutely nothing to do with sensitivity about certain people. This has to do with BLPs. O3000, Ret. ( talk) 17:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 22:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG, or that there is an WP:ATD. 2009 AfD resulted in no consensus but standards were significantly lower then. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 20:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
It's difficult to justify this article staying any longer, about an artist in residence programme in Slovenia. It's difficult enough to find out what Villa Flora is - a search online only brings up a hotel. Article has been tagged as lacking notability since 2014, with no improvement. Sionk ( talk) 19:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No WP:SIGCOV found for this subject to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NSEASONS. Sources present are all short and routine game recaps. Open to a WP:ATD but I don't see any merge/redirect targets. Let'srun ( talk) 19:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Chemnitz#Culture and sights. RL0919 ( talk) 19:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 19:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Sysax Multi Server. RL0919 ( talk) 19:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 19:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint Kitts and Nevis national football team#CONCACAF Gold Cup. RL0919 ( talk) 19:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, no content at CONCACAF Gold Cup that would make this an appropriate WP:BLAR candidate. Note that the article itself barely even has any information actually about St Kitts and Nevis's involvement. Searching online, coverage is limited to match announcements and reports that don't offer much in the way of significant coverage of this team's participation in the CONCACAF Gold Cup. signed, Rosguill talk 18:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Elf on the Shelf. RL0919 ( talk) 19:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The awards aren't enough to meet biographic notability and it's not clear she's independently notable of her company or its famous product. A redirect to Elf on the Shelf, where her book has also been redirected and which most of the sources are actually about would be fine Star Mississippi 16:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional conversation regarding
WP:1E/
WP:BLP1E would be helpful in establishing a firmer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest)
18:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete per WP:BLP1E. RL0919 ( talk) 19:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This article fails Wikipedia's guideline on living persons who are notable for only one event. There's been no sustained coverage of this story as of yet, and it's too soon for an article; Wikipedia is not a news site. Additionally, although this is not an attack page and it states clearly that the charges were dropped, we should be wary of an article containing serious allegations involving child exploitation, anti-semitism, and bomb threats. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 18:03, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of association football players who died during their careers. czar 22:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This footballer unfortunately seems like a failure of WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:ONEEVENT. Being mentioned without a link in List of association football players who died during their careers should probably be enough. Geschichte ( talk) 17:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 17:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 16:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Ganesha811 ( talk) 14:14, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable voice actor. This article was previously deleted when the only citation was to IMDb. Now, almost all of the citations are to behindthevoiceactors.com, which appears to contain user-generated content. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 16:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to David Pratt (Scottish journalist), without prejudice to early recreation if and when new sources support that. A reasonable ATD, well supported by the views expressed here. Owen× ☎ 16:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I do not believe that the content of this article is notable per Wikipedia:Notability (books), as there are only 2 potentially reliable sources; RFC: Electronic Intifada is depreciated. As I do not believe that both sources can be counted towards the notability requirement, and as the original editor is unavailable, I would suggest a deletion.
Additionally, the use of RFC: Electronic Intifada by an author who does not appear to be an authority in their respective field as the primary source for the content of the book, meaning that the content cannot be sourced well. FortunateSons ( talk) 16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Apopka, Florida. Star Mississippi 16:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
The article does not pass NOTNEWS and onlY seems to have one thing that got coverage. No SIGCOV Grahaml35 ( talk) 14:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Avaya. ✗ plicit 02:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Old software almost exclusively cited to its vendor. Can't find much online. BrigadierG ( talk) 13:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotional not notable company's page; clear COI; not reliable sources (in the article on via online search) Gavrover ( talk) 11:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
The book notes: "奥克斯1989年进入电表制造业,随之相继研制出环网柜、变压 器开关柜、箱式变电站等产品,全面进入电力产业。1994年涉足家 电制造业,随之相继研制出商用冰箱、空调、小家电等产品,全面 进入家电产业。2002年进入手机制造业,随之相继研制出GSM、 CDMA等产品。2002年5月进入移动通讯产业,成为国内新兴的移 动通讯终端设备的专业制造商。"
From Google Translate: "Oaks entered the electric meter manufacturing industry in 1989, and subsequently developed ring main unit cabinets, transformer switch cabinets, box-type substations and other products, fully entering the power industry. In 1994, it got involved in the home appliance manufacturing industry, and subsequently developed commercial refrigerators, air conditioners, small household appliances and other products, fully entering the home appliance industry. In 2002, it entered the mobile phone manufacturing industry and subsequently developed GSM, CDMA and other products. In May 2002, it entered the mobile communications industry and became an emerging professional manufacturer of mobile communications terminal equipment in China."
The article notes: "奧克斯集團創立于1986年,以家用電器等起家后跨界到地產、醫療健康、金融等。為了在醫療大健康領域發展,集團旗下上市公司三星電氣(11.710, -0.04, -0.34%)在2015年更名為三星醫療,形成醫療服務與電力產品雙主業格局,醫療服務被視為拉動公司未來業務發展與業績提升的主要引擎。... 資料顯示,奧克斯集團進軍大健康產業先后掛牌浙江大學明州醫院、新建南昌大學附屬撫州醫院、設立醫療投資管理公司、成立醫療並購基金等。"
From Google Translate: "AUX was founded in 1986. It started with household appliances and then crossed over to real estate, medical health, finance, etc. In order to develop in the field of medical health, the group's listed company Samsung Electric (11.710, -0.04, -0.34%) changed its name to Samsung Medical in 2015, forming a dual-main business structure of medical services and power products. Medical services are regarded as driving the company The main engine for future business development and performance improvement. ... Data shows that AUX has entered the big health industry and has successively listed Zhejiang University Mingzhou Hospital, newly built Nanchang University Affiliated Fuzhou Hospital, established a medical investment management company, established a medical M&A fund, etc."
The book notes: "宁波奥克斯集团是我国家电行业的一匹黑马,是机电行业成功运用多种营销战略开 拓市场的一把利剑,是由单一化向多元化扩展的精英,更是中国民营企业快速崛起的一个典范。从四明山下的一个牛棚起家到当今中国制造业的新秀,奥克斯15年的时间完成 了跨越1000倍的成长历程。解读奥克斯所创造的令人难以置信的奇迹,不仅可以更好 地解读浙江民营经济迅速发展之谜,更可以看到奥克斯对于事件营销的过程中战略设计 的特点和创新。"
From Google Translate: "Ningbo AUX is a dark horse in my country's home appliance industry. It is a sharp sword in the electromechanical industry that successfully uses various marketing strategies to open up the market. It is an elite that expands from singleness to diversification. It is also a model of the rapid rise of China's private enterprises. From a bullpen at the foot of Siming Mountain to a rising star in China's manufacturing industry today, AUX has completed a growth process that exceeds 1,000 times in 15 years. Interpreting the incredible miracles created by AUX can not only better understand the mystery of the rapid development of Zhejiang's private economy, but also see the characteristics and innovations of AUX's strategic design in the process of event marketing."
The book notes: "奥克斯集团的总部在浙江宁波。随着公司的发展,人越来越 多,非本地员工的比例也越来越大,在众多非本地员工中以四川 人和湖南人为主。要想让这么多人全力以赴地工作,首先要满足 员工的基本生活。俗话说:民以食为天。可偏偏四川人、湖南人 的口味和宁波人有很大的差异。为了让四川和湖南籍的员工吃得 好,公司管理层要求食堂聘请川菜师傅,增加川菜的比重。可 是,这一要求与食堂的利益无绝对联系,食堂的管理人员因此毫 不重视,一拖再拖。奥克斯集团的管理层并没有马上强制执行自 己的决定,而是采取了非常巧妙的方法。"
From Google Translate: "Oaks Group is headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang. With the development of the company, there are more and more people, and the proportion of non-local employees is also increasing. Among the many non-local employees, Sichuan and Hunan people are the main ones. If you want so many people to work with all their strength, you must first meet the basic needs of employees. As the saying goes: Food is the most important thing for people. But the tastes of Sichuan and Hunan people are very different from those of Ningbo people. In order to allow Sichuan and Hunan employees to eat well, the company management requires the canteen to hire Sichuan cuisine chefs to increase the proportion of Sichuan cuisine. However, this request has no absolute connection with the interests of the canteen, so the management of the canteen does not pay attention to it and delays it again and again. The management of Oaks Group did not immediately enforce its decision, but adopted a very clever approach."
The article notes: "Founded in 1986, Aux Group's major products include home and commercial aircons and other household appliances. It had operating income of CNY86 billion (USD12.4 billion) last year."
The article notes: "Aux Group, one of China's top 500 enterprises, has made an entry into Malaysia's consumer electrical market through a collaboration with a local partner. ... Aux Group was established in 1986, and today its activities span over several industries covering home appliances, electrical equipment, medical equipment and services, real estate and investment. Its air conditioners is ranked the number three most popular brand in China and was the exclusive air conditioning supplier to the 19th Asian 2022 Hangzhou Games."
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To discuss and evaluate the sourcing Cunard identified
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Complex/ Rational 17:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG, independent secondary coverage appears to be nonexistent, taking into account that Hui is a BBC employee. Having received a British Empire Medal does not appear to be a strong case for WP:ANYBIO, particularly in the absence of any independent biographical coverage. signed, Rosguill talk 16:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator, with no !votes for any other outcome. Complex/ Rational 17:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for
WP:N. No obvious
WP:ATD. This has been in
CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.
Boleyn (
talk)
15:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. All of the Delete views are solidly anchored in policy, while none of the Keep views are. As for AI-authored views, I don't have strong feelings either way, but it behooves you to train your Large Language Model on our policies and guidelines if you want the resulting text to be taken seriously. Owen× ☎ 16:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman, fails WP:NBIO. Draftified and creator was asked not to return it to mainspace without AFC review. Previously deleted six times and salted at Kumar Parakala, now 4th time at AfD. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 04:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 20:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. It would be very helpful to display links to previous AFDs. Also useful would be an evaluation to the sources mentioned in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AN article with this long of a history needs more policy-based input please
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
15:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Perfectstrangerz ( talk) 23:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. No obvious WP:ATD. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 15:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for WP:NPRODUCT or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect or redirect to Richard Li, though it might unbalance that article. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn ( talk) 15:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 15:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:N. With the lack of sourcing, I wouldn't propose a merge, but there could be redirect targets such as Chunsoft as a possible WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 15:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was Delete. JBW ( talk) 22:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Publications are not properly focused on the company, neither they are reliable enough to grant meeting NCORP criteria Gavrover ( talk) 11:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Promotional article for a non-notable organization. An earlier PROD was removed because of "many search hits"--well, there may be many hits, but the ones that might look helpful are just really short mentions ( [21], [22], [23]), besides a ton of just websites and non-neutral outfits. Here is the book listed in the article: a single mention; here is the LA Times article: a single mention with a brief appositive. There is no proper coverage for notability.
The article itself--well, there's a ton of name dropping, a bunch of organizational links, and an audacious claims, "CSC helped pass two new laws in California," linked to their own website. The subject does not meet our standards. Drmies ( talk) 14:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of notability for this intersection Fram ( talk) 14:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn, sources found, unless @ QuietHere: objects Mach61 ( talk) 20:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Appears to fail NALBUM. A search pulled up one Billboard review (note that the allmusic rating has no attached review) but nothing else. AfDing on the off chance someone has access to an offline source I don't Mach61 ( talk) 14:40, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nine Network#Local programs. IP redirected without comment; restoring. No need to take this back to AfD unless they continue to edit war about it. (non-admin closure) Nate • ( chatter) 18:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG, multiple contested BLARS, I could only find passing mentions. Suggesting reverting to redirect. Just i yaya 14:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Sources are about the film see no reason to have separate article for soundtrack.Music is not a hit. Tame Rhino ( talk) 13:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn ( talk) 13:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ferdinand IV, Grand Duke of Tuscany. (non-admin closure) Schminnte [ talk to me 20:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Another genealogical entry, the purpose of which appears to be showing whom the subject married and to whom she gave birth. Wikipedia is not a genealogy website. Surtsicna ( talk) 12:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
13:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Appears to have reached WP:HEY. Mojo Hand ( talk) 14:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
This was already deleted via AFD in 2020, and I see little significant coverage since then to suggest the situation has changed. The "best" sources in the article seem to be along the lines of [25], which is both a tabloid and also just an interview so not really in depth secondary significant coverage. — Amakuru ( talk) 10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn after article was nicely amended ( non-admin closure). Ouro ( blah blah) 16:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Some coverage, but I don't think it is enough for
WP:MUSICBIO or
WP:GNG. Merge/redirect or redirect to author is a possible
WP:ATD. This has been in
CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.
Boleyn (
talk)
10:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that they meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. I couldn't find relevant sources in Spanish or English. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. There doesn't seem to be a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn ( talk) 10:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 1. "Abu-'l-Qāsim Ibn-Aḥmad Ibn-Alī Ibn-Ibrahīm az- Zaiyānī et Octave Victor Houdas, Le Maroc de 1631 à 1812 extrait de l'ouvrage intitulé Ettordjemân elmoʻarib ʻan douel elmachriq ou ʻlmaghrib, Octave Victor Houdas, 1886". archive.wikiwix.com. Retrieved 2024-01-13. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Maximilien Antoine Cyprien Henri Poisson de La Martinière et Napoléon Lacroix, Documents pour servir à l'étude du Nord Ouest africain: Le sud-ouest algérien et les régions limitrophes. Figuig. L'oued Guir. L'oued Saoura, Gouvernement général de l'Algérie, Service des affaires indigènes, 1896. p. 36. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "Comer Plummer III, Empire of Clay: The Reign of Moulay Ismail, Sultan of Morocco (1672-1727), Lulu Publishing Services, 2020". archive.wikiwix.com. p. 336. Retrieved 2024-01-13. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth. Source eval:
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 1. The Conversos and Moriscos in Late Medieval Spain and Beyond: Volume 2. The Morisco Issue. BRILL. 2012-06-22. ISBN 978-90-04-22860-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 2. ^ Haedo, Diego de; Haëdo, Diego de (1881). Histoire des rois d'Alger (in French). A. Jourdan. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 3. ^ Friedman, Ellen G. (1983). Spanish Captives in North Africa in the Early Modern Age. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-09380-8. |
Fails SIGCOV, a brief mention, no details | 4. ^ Collado, Manuel Danvila y (1889). La expulsión de los moriscos españoles: conferencias pronunciadas en el Ateneo de Madrid (in Spanish). Librería de Fernando Fé. |
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Two indifferent references fails to show any notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:29, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Its sad you never engage or even want to answer my simple question, thus proving your biasness on African content! More reasons to dicolonise Wikipedia with such editos — Preceding unsigned comment added by MollelwaFahaSaBasotho ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 08:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. No obvious WP:ATD, though there are pages on some of its artists. Boleyn ( talk) 08:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to BBC Radio Ulster. Star Mississippi 04:04, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No independent sources that can establish notability can be found CactiStaccingCrane ( talk) 13:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:19, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient coverage of this field hockey player to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that that up in my searches was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 08:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:15, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Subic Broadcasting Corporation#Stations. Consensus is sourcing is of insufficient depth Star Mississippi 04:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I can't find any reliable sources that could support the subject's notability. Israel's Son 11:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
06:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 09:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find sufficient independent coverage of the subject – a Scottish women's field hockey player – to meet WP:GNG. The closest to WP:SIGCOV that came up in my searches was this short piece from The Edinburgh Reporter with maybe five sentences of coverage, most of which is just repeating her own words. JTtheOG ( talk) 06:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Wordsmith Talk to me 22:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND. Looked online and wasn't able to find anything that meets the guidelines for passing the SNS here. Also checked the newspaper archives and wasn't able to find anything. I will admit it might be hard with the band name to locate suitable material, if someone finds something obvious I missed please ping me so I can retract the nomination. Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Mic Mag | ~ Magazine is also a record label. It appears to have been a small publication at first and is not also a label | ~ If a label is writing articles then I'm not sure if it can really be reliable anymore | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Broadway World | ~ I wasn't able to figure out if this outlet was independent or just a PR outlet with a few legit reviews mixed in. | ~ Came out one day before the Mic Mag article and both read very promotional | ![]() |
~ Partial |
Audio Angest | ? Site is really just one man Ian Roth | ? Site is hosted on substack and the article came out on the same day as the Broadway World article | ![]() |
? Unknown |
buzz-music.com | ~ Not sure if everything on the site is user submitted or influenced | ![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
punkrocks.co.uk | ~ No editorial policy page, articles mostly appear to be authored by one person Oscar Manners | ~ Lack of editorial structure makes it hard to figure out if this is reliable. Also this article was released on the same day as all the others | ~ Article is quite short compared to the others, coverage is only about them but there isn't much there/ | ~ Partial |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Delete per nominator; they don't yet meet the notability criteria. Maybe it's just too soon, but the sources that currently exist are dodgy. JSFarman ( talk) 19:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:10, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. An ATD can be considered editorially. Star Mississippi 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Topic has little to no WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. The article is an unreferenced stub that has changed little since it was created more than a decade ago. A search turned up Hellebuyck, Chuck (2008). Programming The Basic Atom Microcontroller. Createspace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 978-1-4404-7976-2., which is a self-published book, and Kelemen, Michal; et al. (2014). "Rapid Control Prototyping of Embedded Systems Based on Microcontroller". Procedia Engineering. 96: 215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.146. which is a short description in a small, defunct engineering journal. I suggest we delete. 〈 Forbes72 | Talk 〉 01:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Arbitrarily0 (
talk)
01:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
05:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas. Complex/ Rational 17:39, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This is much the same situation as Appanoose, Kansas: a short-lived post office in the mid-1800s, replaced by a township. The situation is complicated by a flood of false Ghits, as there is also a Greenwood County in the eastern part of the state, and the community center mentioned is actually over near/in Kansas City. The church is there, though, with its cemetery, and that's all there is to the place presently. Again, there is no evidence for anything otehr than a vague locale. Mangoe ( talk) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I can find no Greenwood other than the township in Franklin in the history books. Andreas 1883 only has the township (on p.621), for example. Presumably people will want to disambiguate Greenwood County, Kansas, Greenwood Township, Phillips County, Kansas, and Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas.Greenwood; village in Quincy Township, Greenwood County.
Greenwood; station on St. Louis and San Francisco Railway, in Twin Grove Township, Greenwood County; altitude, 991 feet.
Greenwood; southeast county […]
Greenwood; township in Franklin County; area, 30 square miles; population, 712.
Greenwood; township in Phllips County; area, 36 square miles; population, 303.
— Gannett 1898, pp. 101–102
Once again we are victim of the "A post office implies a village/town; so a defunct post office with no town implies a ghost town." double fallacy on the parts of people who don't know how post offices and townships worked. There is zero evidence beyond what the one source actually says, which is that this is a post office that used to be run by the Sac and Fox Agency Stage Company. Another source confirms that it was run by postmaster Elijah S. Buckner and changed names in 1861.
Finally, returning to Andreas 1883, p. 621 we find that the Sac and Fox reservation in Franklin County was moved to Osage County in 1863, which is why the post office changed, so that Greenwood Township, Franklin County, Kansas could be settled in the reservation's place in 1863 and organized in 1865.
It's an old Indian agency post office, that got renamed per the Greenwood Township. Ironically, Sac and Fox#History skips over Kansas in the 1850s and 1860s entirely without a mention, and goes straight to Iowa.
The result was redirect to Fonterra. Given the disruption during the AFD, I will E/C the redirect Star Mississippi 03:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Though this product is covered in scientific papers, this does not indicate its notability. In line with the guidelines at WP:PRODUCTS an article about a product should have significant coverage in secondary sources to indicate notability. A search for specifically "Probiotic Probio DR10" or for the shorter phrase "Probio DR10" returns no results from either google books or google scholar. DR10 is covered, as cited, in research papers, but this coverage is not significant. Therefore I propose that the article be turned into a redirect either to the company that created the product Fonterra or to the more general article probiotic. 🌿MtBotany ( talk) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Could not find extensive indepth coverage, a mere 5 gnews hits which are mainly small mentions. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar ( talk) 04:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Page was turned down two times in page review and then put to mainspace anyways by the article's creator. Ziad as a squash player has no significant coverage specific to them; beside passing mentions in other articles. They are currently ranked 182 by the PSA (squash tour), which is also not a notable ranking. Their current rankings mean they are limited in the tournaments they may enter. On the PSA website on Ziad Sakr's which lists news and video specific to the player no listings are specific to Ziad Sakr. On the Wiki page there listed notable win in 2012 is the British Open which was for the U-13 category. A junior tournament win of that caliber while impressive is not enough to meet notability requirements. KeepItGoingForward ( talk) 01:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep -Thank you for your comments; I appreciate the time you are taking to address them. Let's begin by addressing your concerns. The British Junior Open stands as one of the biggest and most prestigious tournaments in squash juniors' careers. Winning it is akin to securing a world championship. Moreover, this individual has clinched multiple significant international titles, including the Arabian Championship three times with the Egyptian national team and the 17th national championship for Trinity College. Since squash lacks a standardized league, the College Squash National Championship holds immense importance. For aspiring professional squash players, winning it is a pivotal goal, attracting sponsors and providing an advantage for promoters to grant access to wild cards and satellite tournaments in the professional circuit, a crucial step in starting a professional career.
Regarding the second point, Ziad Sakr moved from 800 to 182 in the rankings within a year. I respectfully disagree with your assertion that this is not notable. Achieving such a feat—climbing over 500 places in under 12 months at the beginning of a professional squash career—is a commendable and significant accomplishment. Ziad now qualifies to compete in major tournaments, and within the squash community, he is well-known. After conducting an interview with him, I am convinced he deserves to have a Wikipedia page so more people can learn about his achievements.
This has nothing to do with promotion, as you said. I am trying to give him the recognition he deserves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Namexre ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting we really need to hear from more than 2 editors on this situation. Just a reminder that each edito can cast a single bolded "vote" so please do not post votes repeatedly. I might come back and hat some of these tangent discussions. I think they would discourage editors from joining in the conversation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 09:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in BEFORE are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 1. Metcalfe, Alex (2014-03-11). Muslims of Medieval Italy. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-8843-2. |
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 2. ^ Barbera, Henry. The Military Factor in Social Change Vol. 2. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-3781-1. |
Fails SIGCOV, generally discusses events in the time from but nothing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth | 3. ^ Barbera, Henry (1994). Medieval Sicily: The First Absolute State. Legas. ISBN 978-1-881901-05-1. |
// Timothy :: talk 03:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Calpe#History. seems to have slightly more consensus than Barbary slave trade. That can be fine tuned when the merge is performed as target is not an admin decision Star Mississippi 03:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and NEVENT. Sources in article and found in before are not WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth.
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Fails SIGCOV. Article event took place in 1637, book covers 1735-1830, has one sentence mention | 1. Bekkaoui, K. (2010-11-24). White Women Captives in North Africa: Narratives of Enslavement, 1735-1830. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 978-0-230-29449-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a one sentence mention | 2. ^ Street, Lucie (1986). An Uncommon Sailor: A Portrait of Admiral Sir William Penn, English Naval Supremacy. Kensal Press. ISBN 978-0-946041-47-3. |
Fails SIGCOV, a one sentence mention | 3. ^ Friedman, Ellen G. (1983). Spanish Captives in North Africa in the Early Modern Age. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-09380-8. |
Fails SIGCOV, again a mention, nothing about the event | 4. ^ Hershenzon, Daniel (2018-08-01). The Captive Sea: Slavery, Communication, and Commerce in Early Modern Spain and the Mediterranean. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN 978-0-8122-9536-8. |
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 09:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Moved to draft but brought back into mainspace by the creator, this article lacks in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources. There may be sources in Bengali or other languages I can’t access, but on present showing it’s not notable. Mccapra ( talk) 03:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 09:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This biography of an Olympic athlete was created by Lugnuts under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only references are two database entries.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:38, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Poorly sourced footballer BLP which fails WP:GNG. All I found were passing mentions of the subject ( 2018, 2020, 2022, etc.) JTtheOG ( talk) 02:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Munchkin#Welfare concerns or another section thereof Star Mississippi 03:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
WP:Notability (breeds) requires recognition from a major registry which the Bambino currently lacks (it's only experimental). There are many Munchkin derived breeds and I do not believe that they meet notability without the recognition as there's nothing special about them, other issues in the article include poor sources such as generic pet care websites and many of the references are about the Munchkin itself (as health issues and legal issues relate to the breed) To add on to notability issues the breed doesn't even seem to be mentioned on TICA's website. Have mentioned deletion on Wikiproject Cats too. Traumnovelle ( talk) 02:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 01:36, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:NSPORT; in Korean, when searched there are no significant articles covering their career. Few games on record. toobigtokale ( talk) 01:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. However if an editor is aware of a way to keep it current and helpful in a manner complementary to the existing seasonal ones, happy to provide it as a draft. Star Mississippi 03:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTSTATS, WP:V and possibly WP:BLP. In general, lists of "current" things are of dubious notability, because they will, in all likelihood, become empty at some point in the future (see the recent USFL AfD, for example).
This is a largely unreferenced list of living people which is terminally out of date. Some of the sublists haven't been updated since 2015. The page is a collection of career statistics which lack context, and it's unclear how the numbers are derived (e.g. do they include stats from multiple NASCAR series?) They may even be original calculations. Even if the list were well-referenced and updated regularly, it's unclear why the career statistics of this WP:CROSSCAT of drivers (i.e. currently active in any NASCAR series) are notable.
Actually current and verifiable information about the current roster of NASCAR drivers can be found on the per-season pages, such as 2023 NASCAR Cup Series. Because these pages refer to specific years, we can be assured that notability will persist indefinitely.
No consensus to delete last summer, but no compelling arguments to keep, either. pburka ( talk) 00:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)