The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Originally a redirect to Neural Networks (journal). Article created in its original form by obvious COI editor Internationalneuralnetworksociety, which was reverted to a redirect. Very similar article then created by Hailneum, whose only other contribution is twice-failed AFC submission Draft:International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).
Sources cited in the article are either:
Other coverage of the organisation I was able to locate includes a few passing mentions in newspapers at the time of its founding; and a handful of passing mentions in an "oral history", which is mostly transcripts of interviews with people involved with the organisation.
In short, despite the existence of Stephen Grossberg and the journal, there does not seem sufficient inherent notability to meet either GNG or NORG. Triptothecottage ( talk) 23:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Again, Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or any applicable WP:SNG even after previous AfD. This is mostly based on WP:INHERENT and WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Below is my source assessment;
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/09/13/the-plug-topboy-entertainment-formalise-merger-announce-mohammed-as-managing-partner | Promotional piece about the merger of The Plug and TopBoy Entertainment | Even though ThisDay is reliable per WP:NGRS, No byline used in the piece. Promotional nature of this piece also affects its reliability | ~ Mostly about the merger of The Plug and TopBoy Entertainment | ✘ No |
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/10/16/oluwatobi-mohammed-the-young-entertainment-disruptor | Promotional piece that is not entirely independent | Ditto | ✘ No | |
https://tribuneonlineng.com/tobi-mohammed-a-journey-of-innovation-from-tech-to-entertainment/ | This source appears to be a promotional profile piece on Tobi Mohammed. | Even though per WP:NGRS, Nigerian Tribune is reliable, the promotional nature of this article affects its reliability. | ✘ No | |
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/11/from-dream-to-reality-the-inspiring-journey-of-topboy-entertainment/ | This source seems to be a promotional piece about TopBoy Entertainment. | Source is marginally reliable per WP:NGRS, and the promotional nature of this article affects its reliability | The article provides significant coverage of the journey of TopBoy Entertainment | ✘ No |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/news/1256 | ~ This source is a promotional piece about Tobi Mohammed’s BlockParty series. | Even though the promo from here oozes, it does not affect this context. | This is about Tobi Mohammed’s BlockParty series and not Tobi Mohammed himself | ✘ No |
https://digimillennials.com/music/offstage-alhaji-popping/ | No byline used in piece and reads promotional | ✘ No | ||
https://socialmediaweeklagos2020.sched.com/speaker/tobi27 | This source is a profile of Tobi Mohammed from the Social Media Week Lagos 2020 event. | Promotional profile | ✘ No | |
https://dailypost.ng/2023/06/09/tobi-mohammed-shares-invaluable-insights-on-soft-power/ | Obvious sponsored content | Even though Daily Post is reliable, this is an obvious sponsored content | ✘ No | |
https://notjustok.com/article/afrobeats-live-and-awards-power-players-2019/ | No byline used | Not specifically about the subject | ✘ No | |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/magazine/3rd/57 | Ditto | ~ | Ditto | ✘ No |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/news/1184 | Ditto | ~ | Ditto | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
IDK why this is even an article? It doesn't even have a corresponding Spanish article. Maybe some of this could go to Wikisource? I don't know. No sign of notability in any way. Heck it's entry on Wikisource got deleted due to WP:COPYVIO concerns. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 23:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing isn't sufficient. While I'd advocate for those who found sourcing to start over to build an article based in sourcing, I'm willing to provide the text as a draft if experienced editors think they can make something viable from this. Star Mississippi 02:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
A PROD on this expired in 2009; it should have been deleted a long time ago. The article is a weird puff piece, likely by a COI editor, and is really just promotional. I find nothing on the internet that suggests this person is notable. Drmies ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This is Architect Dave Carnivale; someone notified me that my Wikipedia page (which I've been proud to have for many years) has been suggested by someone to be deleted. I write to you because I've tried but cannot find out how to "join the discussion" and hope you will be kind enough to add my comments for me.Sounding immodest cannot be helped in listing why I should remain, forgive me. First, being the first architect in the world to have a website (affordablehouse.com) which made its debut March 15, 1996, and that at the time having been the second book anywhere on Earth printed cover-to-cover on the internet (the site was simplified and revised around 2022 after having been "on the air" so-to-speak for a quarter century is enough to warrant my page. Remember, in 1996 only 25k-30k websites were functioning at all; another 75k simply said "Under Construction."Secondly, in an 8 year federal case, pro se, which went to the del. District Court ('Carnivale v. Staub' Civ.No.08-764-SLR), the Federal Circuit (Appeal from the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office,Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 92047553 'Staub v. Carnivale) and the Third Circuit (Civil Action 1:08-cv-00764-SLR) I brought trademark law, specifically the 1948 Lanham Act regarding trademark protections into the computer age. The case is now cited throughout the country and established that tiny alterations in domain names is insufficient to protect against claims of trademark infringement. In turning to my page I see a few inaccuracies which have crept in over the years; my projects now number more than 700 across the U.S. (not 500) and my book is now self published rather than published by BookSurge. Having practiced for neary a half century (not quite but getting close) and having won nearly every preservation award there is in N.Y.C. (I am a very traditional architect with a strong interest in preserving historic architecture) I am not unknown and am, as much an architect as those listed under 'American Architects' - and on Staten Island, a place of 500,000 people, I can say that I am fairly well known.I do not know why someone moved me from "People from Staten Island" to "Artists from Staten Island"- that is inaccurate in that I am an architect, a retired college professor, a preservationist and an author - and architects, while they should be artistic, are part historians, part engineers, part mathematicians and part businessmen too- putting me in the 'artists' category is simply less accurate, if not inaccurate. I see someone called my page a "Puff Piece" which does not reflect I was the first pioneer of a major profession on the internet, and, acting pro se for 8 years in federal court, I altered trademark law regarding the internet. For these reasons, I ask that you might ne kind enough to enter my comments into the discussion for me, since I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. I may send this same message to another editor or two, but you are the first I've contacted....I thank you in advance, Sincerely yours, David Carnivale 2603:7000:6E3B:C199:B1A5:F394:7F02:6A17 ( talk) (transferred from User talk:Jevansen)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 03:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion. For the IP editors identifying themselves as "David Carnivale", if you wish to continue to participate in this discussion, please keep comments concise and related to sources and Wikipedia policies, subjects that can impact whether or not this article subject (you) is considered notable by Wikipedia standards.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that the article is based on a topic that has been discussed in reliable sources, and is thus not synth. There is also consensus that although the article may need cleanup (and a move to a new title might be appropriate), it is reliably sourced. The proposal to merge did not gain consensus, but this close is without prejudice to proposing a merge in the normal course. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Original research not suitable for an encyclopedia. A mathematical treatise with only a couple of references to basic facts the rest are heavily mathematized proofs and reasonings. Some people in the previous discussion argue that counterexamples are OK. Referenced counter-examples are OK. References demonstrate both correctness and notability of the content. The reader does not have to trust a wikipedian that the nontrivial math is correct. - Altenmann >talk 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
only a couple of references. And its content is obviously a wall of heavy original mathematical research. "Cranking through the math one finds that..." - sure thing, professor. Hold my beer. - Altenmann >talk 20:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
a wall of heavy original mathematical research. The only part that wasn't already backed up by sources explicitly discussing the specific examples given was the "Examples with support almost everywhere in " subsection. The "Cranking through the math" part was a tone problem, not a content problem, and that was easily fixed. Right now, the page is in deletion is not cleanup territory, I think. It might need further trimming and revising for proper encyclopedic tone, but the basic complaint of the nomination is unfounded. XOR'easter ( talk) 21:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This article demonstrates that [...]is something of a heavy giveaway. The premise here is "I will make an argument", not "I will document a topic". This can be carried within an existing article because we have more leeway there to shape the structure of how information is presented, but it is quite unsuitable for a separate article. Make it a subsection under (or after) Independence (probability theory)#Examples, and it should be okay. Sentences like "it is sometimes mistakenly thought that" still require sourcing/attribution. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I see very different, opposing views of this article. Let's see if one relisting can bring a clearer consensus or another possible Merge target emerges.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Questionable for sustained notability with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 23:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Beezer. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Nothing found which suggests there is independent notability to the inclusion standards beyond The Beezer, not clear this content could be supported fully with references per WP:V even if it was to be merged. WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect. It could be redirected to The Beezer per ATD. Desertarun ( talk) 09:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Regretfully I can't find any evidence she meets WP:GNG. There is no obituary of her death in 1969 or anything about her life except for the 1928 book that has her as president of a Burbank club (not notable enough for its own article), which was not a national position. —Kaliforniyka Hi! 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Any more comments on the quality of additions since the article's nomination?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
An example is that a paragraph-long obituary of a scientist in a respected non-local national newspaper will be treated as more conducive of significant coverage than a paragraph-long obituary of an un-elected politician in a respected non-local national newspaper. A short obituary about an unelected politician in the Los Angeles Times doesn't convey as much significance as an obituary of the same length about a club woman like Jane Marks does, as such figures are less likely in general than politicians to get such obituaries at all. Also, WP:OHW guides my reading of the Women of the West entry; as a biographical dictionary, it has a compressed format
that conveys more information in fewer words. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 18:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete after a month of discussions and relistings. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an ill-defined religious "movement". I doubt anyone identifies themselves as a Reformed fundamentalist. That's not necessarily fatal, but makes it harder to identify what the group is. You can google "Reformed fundamentalism" and find lots of hits, but many of them will be using it as a pejorative and foil for something else. I think it is possible that a phenomenon called "Reformed fundamentalism" exists as something that could be defined using reliable independent sources, but it would be difficult and this article does not even begin to attempt it. I think the current Christian fundamentalism page appears to do this quite well for that group, most of which would also not self-identify. But I think there are zero independent reliable sources in this article (even Packer is not independent), so I think the best course is WP:TNT. The article is original research sourced mostly to different groups and their beliefs, almost none of which identify themselves as "Reformed fundamentalists." The closest would be Packer's Fundamentalism and the Word of God, since Packer would identify as Reformed and wrote a book on fundamentalism. But even there Packer was writing a polemic to a broader audience than the Reformed world; he was not arguing for "Reformed fundamentalism" but Christian fundamentalism. Jfhutson ( talk) 13:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It looks like this might close as No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Yury Dud#vDud. Liz Read! Talk! 08:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. This is an unusual situation; the subject is a YouTube channel. The creator (Yury Dud) is wp:notable primarily via unrelated areas. The references here barely even mention VDud much less GNG coverage and there really isn't coverage derived from them. This is basically nothing but a self-written catalog of the YouTube channel. The article on the creator seems to have encyclopedic coverage of vDud, but is also confusing, seeming to be covering unrelated things as being vD. IMO the tiny bit of enclyclopedic content here should be merged into Yury Dud. Someday if someone could get GNG references and derive content from them that might viable. North8000 ( talk) 19:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1 sentence not notable •Cyberwolf• talk? 19:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Penang Transport Master Plan. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient for a standalone Star Mississippi 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is a proposed line, it has not been given any projected completion time and is not a final concept, though for some reason the article is written like it is a completed line. No sourcing beyond the regional government has been shown to give any coverage to this concept. It is clearly too soon to have an article on this proposed line given the lack of coverage in secondary sources. A basic BEFORE search turned up no further coverage. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The line is scheduled for opening by 2045.This is not something we should be giving a dedicated article when it won't open for more than 20 years, per WP:CRYSTAL. This should be a paragraph within Penang Transport Master Plan. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please review recent changes to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dance in Cambodia. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The WP:PROD was removed, but there are still no sources (of the three links one leads to a Khmer-page language describing a particular song, second one is dead, third one is to the video). I have spend reasonable time trying to locate reliable sources in English and Khmer (second one using translation tools) and came up empty. Викидим ( talk) 20:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment I can't find anything on it even in Khmer, except this and a brief mention here . Lots of videos on YouTube, TikTok and Facebook which would indicate cultural notability but we do need sources... This is about Thai students singing a song of the same name. Perhaps try different spellings and variations in searching? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 04:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
She fails WP:GNG as there is no sources covering her in depth. The article is created based on recentism because she just received nominal coverage due to her few days arrest and she being the daughter of a notable politician Shireen Mazari. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
off topic discussion
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hurricane Hugo. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Barely intelligible. From what I've gathered, a Hurricane Hunters flight had an engine failure in flight during a mission, but was still able to return to base and land safely, see Hurricane hunters#Other incidents. This does not merit a separate article. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability - sole sources on the article are arcade database listings, KLOV is reliable per WP:VG/RS while Arcade History is unreliable. I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources demonstrating notability. Waxworker ( talk) 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already been PROD'd. Not eligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 22:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
If kept, this may need TNT'ing as it does seem promotional in places. Long-time unreferenced BLP - lots of roles, working actor, but i couldn't find the sources to show he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to previous AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient sources have been provided to prove notability. This article is regarding a company-sized sub-unit. PercyPigUK ( talk) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable topic, too many primary sources, + unreliable sources, few notable sources found online 2003 LN 6 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as far as I can tell. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an Australian rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG. Participation-based SNGs were deprecated in 2022 and BLPs require strong sourcing. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find any coverage of this locomotive in secondary sources. The source used for basically the entire article is a self-published website. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. Per nom.
124.148.210.252 (
talk) 21:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE –
dudhhr
talk
contribssheher 22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
8-year orphaned permastub on a "technology entrepreneur" with a single middling reference. BD2412 T 20:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am having a hard time finding anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable Russian physicist. The article was created by its subject ( Okulov99 ( talk · contribs)), contains no references or sources confirming the subject's notability (expect of the publication list of the subject). It is basically a promotional page. Ruslik_ Zero 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. SNOW. And, to the IP editor, a "soft delete" is not possible if there is a single Keep vote and the discussion is unanimously Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. Agusmagni ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 6 Regiment Army Air Corps. Sandstein 20:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion, the article is not notable. Only one reference is listed and it is not independent of the topic of the article. In the case of this article, the squadron is company-sized. PercyPigUK ( talk) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination.Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Of the current sources, the first was written by the subject himself, and the second is a brief mention quoted from a press release. A BEFORE check revealed some quotes and namedrops but little else. Let'srun ( talk) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
As a Soft Deletion, this article could be restored if this absent chessplayer ever pops back up on the competitive chess radar. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:GNG. The sources in the article are all databases, and a WP:BEFORE check only comes up with passing mentions such as [ [11]]. Let'srun ( talk) 18:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Notes. Not voting one way or the other at this stage, just noting that he represented a large country (Canada) at chess, and most of his activity was in the 1960s where sources are not so easy to find on the internet. He played in 3 Canadian Championships. His Elo rating on the first FIDE list in 1970 was 2260, and it seems he didn't play any rated games after that. MaxBrowne2 ( talk) 07:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a relevant subject for an article. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. This could well be regarded as suitable for deletion under speedy deletion criterion G4 (re-creation of a page previously deleted as the outcome of a deletion discussion), but it unambiguously qualifies under criterion G11 (advertising or promotion). JBW ( talk) 18:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NGO. Can't find any reliable or independent sources. Page was previously deleted as well. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. SNOW Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Violates WP:DICDEF. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ T/ C] 17:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:MILL journalist, non-notable. Broc ( talk) 09:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 16:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
My PROD tag was removed, so here we are. This is an older duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance. As this award was divided into two categories from 2014 to 2023, the article is also partly a duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Male and Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Female. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 06:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG. Technically meets the requirements at WP:NTENNIS through his wildcard in a local tournament but has no accomplishments as a tennis player that indicate notability. Adamtt9 ( talk) 15:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The page has a single source, and none of these are legitimate clubs. They are only teams that happened to be registered with that name, and seemingly never operated at any capacity outside of amateur tournaments that took place years ago. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 15:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:NACTOR or WP:NSPORT, all film roles appear to have been minor roles so far. He's been in teams of several performers at the openings of national sports events, but this doesn't bring him over the line for WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Couldn't find any significant secondary coverage of him in English or Khmer, just passing mentions and social media. Declined three times at draft. Wikishovel ( talk) 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
— Songha_Mao ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Papaursa ( talk) 01:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was no discussion of the sources provided during the discussions, the delete rationales are not paritcularly strong, and there were a couple of merge suggestions. A merge discussion can be handled on the talk page. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nothing in the article suggests this meets WP:NSOFT/ WP:GNG, and my BEFORE did not find anything useful ( WP:SIGCOV-compliant). Can anyone save this? Otherwise we can consider a redirect target, perhaps? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm WP:AGF here and following the assessment of the people who say they're subject matter specialists - not that there's anybody contradicting them or asking to keep the article. Sandstein 19:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This page is a reinvention under a different name of established metallurgy and materials science by a scientist at UCLA in 2018. Well before nanotechnology became a buzzword, metallurgists and material scientists were using structure at the nano size scale (mainly) deliberately in commercial materials, for instance steels and more recently superalloys. There is nothing in this article which is not already covered better elsewhere, both within Wikipedia and outside. Beyond this the article also has structural problems with much of it a list that is not expanded upon, and many parts are written as WP:CRYSTAL and/or WP:OR, although I think much (most?) of what is here is already established science. Neither Wikipedia nor scientists should be reinventing the wheel. (Yup, this page does annoy me!) Ldm1954 ( talk) 06:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Discussion about splitting may continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 23:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Grossly out-of-date and incomplete. Even if the list WERE complete AND up-to-date, there is no lead section, no cited sources, AND no explanation why this list is encyclopedically notable. In the current form, it will never meet the requirements of a quality list article on Wikipedia. I also don't really get the purpose of this article. For searching figure skaters, we have the category "figure skaters", which has the big advantage that newly-created biographies are automatically added there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article created by a clear WP:COI editor and fails WP:GNG, and WP:NSCHOOL. Redirect to British Schools foundation may be on the cards, but that article has notability concerns as well. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 14:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability standards in WP:NSPORT. In addition, no non-trivial sources are provided, and I could not find any. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 14:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:NSPORT, the existence of stat pages is not enough to prove notability. There are no other sources referenced, and nothing shows up in a search for news articles or other sourceable media. This article clearly doesn't meet the notability requirements. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 14:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was convert to disambiguation page. Sandstein 19:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing substantial coverage of the topic in independent reliable sources needed for consideration against the inclusion criteria. JMWt ( talk) 14:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be just an Arabic dictionary definition for Nation. Both sources used are just for the English word. At one stage this was a redirect to Nation, but this doesn't meet the usual expectation for cross-language redirects of specific relevance. Also of note is that the ar.wiki article ar:قوم is not about Nation, but a short stub about something else. Originally this article was a redirect to Qawm, but it is not mentioned there and I'm unsure if that is also a cross-language redirect. CMD ( talk) 07:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 12:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years and claims on the page can be removed per WP:V. Not seeing notability outside of the author William S. Burroughs JMWt ( talk) 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL as he never won a national or provincial election, merely running for an election does not make one notable. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The author was a blocked sock (G5), and it's snowing down below anyway. Girth Summit (blether) 12:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:GNG / WP:BIO.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about an individual that doesn't meet out
general notability guidelines for inclusion of
musicians,
actors and as the case may be. The sources doesn't seem to be significantly covered and per se, have more of PR and paid writing.
Safari Scribe
Edits!
Talk! 09:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Midnight's Children. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this topic is notable enough to have it's own page but the information would be useful as a small section in Midnight's Children. Perhaps under style or reception. (I hope this is the right way to go about this) Moritoriko ( talk) 04:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 09:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This camp seems to have received no significant coverage over its long history. A google brings up nothing but a couple of blogs and a press release, and a search of the newspapers.com archive only brings up advertisements in local newspapers, nothing that would contribute to GNG. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 06:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 09:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely self-sourced to the website of purported DNS blacklists. I was unable to find much sourcing specifically about comparison of different blacklists, so I believe WP:LISTN is not met even if the NOR issues (i.e. categorization of different blacklists into reputable and "suspect" lists based on primary sources) could be overcome. I don't see any content with sufficient sourcing to preserve. ( t · c) buidhe 08:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aranmanai 4. as an ATD. If you strongly object to this Redirection, feel free to take it to WP:RFD. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The sources are all about Aranmanai 4, but make no mention of "Baakghost" or "Baak" (except in one source "Baak" is mentioned but it appears to be a character from Aranmanai 4." A hoax? Cleo Cooper ( talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Book of Mormon places. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Wp:gng. This is an in universe location with little attention inside LDS circles, and none in independent reliable sources - especially no indepth coverage we could use to build an article
Big Money Threepwood (
talk) 05:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 05:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet and there are no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Per wp:notdict and wp:gng, this is a definition of an in universe phrase using only in universe sources. No secondary sources seem to have spent time writing anything in depth about the use of the phrase secret combination in Mormon culture
Big Money Threepwood (
talk) 04:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC) the nominator has been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
No secondary sources seem to have spent time writing anything in depth about the use of the phrase secret combinationis not quite accurate. Looking through Google Scholar reveals the following:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No indication this meets WP:GNG. Sources provided are primary/promotional in nature. Most substantial source I have been able to locate is this brief fluff interview with the editor. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This has been unsourced and has notability issues for over a decade. Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG ZimZalaBim talk 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 04:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-ha. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:NBIO, and I do not believe being a producer for a notable band is an automatic WP:NMUSIC pass either. I could not locate sources with substantial coverage of Ratcliff. All sources cover him only peripherally, as a producer for a-Ha. The article is now primarily an autobiography. Would accept a redirect to a-Ha as an alternative to deletion. Jfire ( talk) 03:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I will take legal action if you have the cheek to remove this article", "
My lawyers will only reveal their legal expertise", "
before I wake up my lawyer and we can sort this out legally", and "
It will be very easy for me to find out who you really are" is not okay here. You need to avoid making statements that can be construed as legal threats or threats to reveal someone's identity.
Why am I having to justify facts that are common knowledge in my industry?" is a valid question. The answer is that one of the pillars of Wikipedia is that information here is verifiable: readers must be able to check that any information is not just made up. That means we can't rely on what's "common knowledge" in any industry unless it's been published in reliable sources somewhere. When your autobiography is published, we may be able to use it as a source in a-ha (depending on whether it is self-published or not). But we can't just rely on your own personal statements here, even if we believe them. Jfire ( talk) 04:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Sirfurboy
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.johnratcliff.com/john--a-ha | "In his own words". His own website. WP:SPS | ? Reliable but self promotional | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20220521024623/https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/ha-take-me | I believe it is. Didn't actually check. | He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him | ✘ No | |
https://thequietus.com/articles/18805-aha-hunting-high-and-low-take-on-me-review-anniversary | He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him | ✘ No | ||
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01727601 | A primary source that says nothing about Ratcliffe in any case | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
However the redirect is reasonable as this is clearly someone who gets a mention regarding a-ha and is borderline notable. Although the above assessment covers what is in the page, there could be more secondary sources on him. However the name is quite common and searching is complicated by finding other notable Jonh Ratcliffes. I was not able to find any suitable coverage, but if multiple independent reliable secondary sources with sigificant coverage can be found, then, of course, this would be a notable subject for a page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK2/SK4, sock nom. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 04:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This article has many wrong and disputed information like IkkJutt Jammu is different organisation in Jammu And ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal is different from it. Both organisation have officially different different social accounts and websites.pls delete it. Nishalover — Preceding undated comment added 10:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 01:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I tried to do WP:BEFORE, but it seems like this is the only sigcov [27] for this character. Meanwhile, others were just from game reviews with the same name, including the current sources used in the receptions section. Unfortunately, we need more to pass WP:GNG threshold. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 02:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
a distinctly Jewish gentleman. " Three best sources" is an essay rather than a guideline or policy, but for what it's worth this demonstrates there are three solid sources for the character's notability. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 07:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The 2 sources provided are from time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers as I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint Louis University (Philippines)#Academics. Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable subject. May need to be redirected to Saint Louis University (Philippines). Sanglahi86 ( talk) 01:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Originally a redirect to Neural Networks (journal). Article created in its original form by obvious COI editor Internationalneuralnetworksociety, which was reverted to a redirect. Very similar article then created by Hailneum, whose only other contribution is twice-failed AFC submission Draft:International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).
Sources cited in the article are either:
Other coverage of the organisation I was able to locate includes a few passing mentions in newspapers at the time of its founding; and a handful of passing mentions in an "oral history", which is mostly transcripts of interviews with people involved with the organisation.
In short, despite the existence of Stephen Grossberg and the journal, there does not seem sufficient inherent notability to meet either GNG or NORG. Triptothecottage ( talk) 23:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Again, Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or any applicable WP:SNG even after previous AfD. This is mostly based on WP:INHERENT and WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Below is my source assessment;
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/09/13/the-plug-topboy-entertainment-formalise-merger-announce-mohammed-as-managing-partner | Promotional piece about the merger of The Plug and TopBoy Entertainment | Even though ThisDay is reliable per WP:NGRS, No byline used in the piece. Promotional nature of this piece also affects its reliability | ~ Mostly about the merger of The Plug and TopBoy Entertainment | ✘ No |
https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/10/16/oluwatobi-mohammed-the-young-entertainment-disruptor | Promotional piece that is not entirely independent | Ditto | ✘ No | |
https://tribuneonlineng.com/tobi-mohammed-a-journey-of-innovation-from-tech-to-entertainment/ | This source appears to be a promotional profile piece on Tobi Mohammed. | Even though per WP:NGRS, Nigerian Tribune is reliable, the promotional nature of this article affects its reliability. | ✘ No | |
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/11/from-dream-to-reality-the-inspiring-journey-of-topboy-entertainment/ | This source seems to be a promotional piece about TopBoy Entertainment. | Source is marginally reliable per WP:NGRS, and the promotional nature of this article affects its reliability | The article provides significant coverage of the journey of TopBoy Entertainment | ✘ No |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/news/1256 | ~ This source is a promotional piece about Tobi Mohammed’s BlockParty series. | Even though the promo from here oozes, it does not affect this context. | This is about Tobi Mohammed’s BlockParty series and not Tobi Mohammed himself | ✘ No |
https://digimillennials.com/music/offstage-alhaji-popping/ | No byline used in piece and reads promotional | ✘ No | ||
https://socialmediaweeklagos2020.sched.com/speaker/tobi27 | This source is a profile of Tobi Mohammed from the Social Media Week Lagos 2020 event. | Promotional profile | ✘ No | |
https://dailypost.ng/2023/06/09/tobi-mohammed-shares-invaluable-insights-on-soft-power/ | Obvious sponsored content | Even though Daily Post is reliable, this is an obvious sponsored content | ✘ No | |
https://notjustok.com/article/afrobeats-live-and-awards-power-players-2019/ | No byline used | Not specifically about the subject | ✘ No | |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/magazine/3rd/57 | Ditto | ~ | Ditto | ✘ No |
https://www.turntablecharts.com/news/1184 | Ditto | ~ | Ditto | ✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
IDK why this is even an article? It doesn't even have a corresponding Spanish article. Maybe some of this could go to Wikisource? I don't know. No sign of notability in any way. Heck it's entry on Wikisource got deleted due to WP:COPYVIO concerns. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 23:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing isn't sufficient. While I'd advocate for those who found sourcing to start over to build an article based in sourcing, I'm willing to provide the text as a draft if experienced editors think they can make something viable from this. Star Mississippi 02:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
A PROD on this expired in 2009; it should have been deleted a long time ago. The article is a weird puff piece, likely by a COI editor, and is really just promotional. I find nothing on the internet that suggests this person is notable. Drmies ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This is Architect Dave Carnivale; someone notified me that my Wikipedia page (which I've been proud to have for many years) has been suggested by someone to be deleted. I write to you because I've tried but cannot find out how to "join the discussion" and hope you will be kind enough to add my comments for me.Sounding immodest cannot be helped in listing why I should remain, forgive me. First, being the first architect in the world to have a website (affordablehouse.com) which made its debut March 15, 1996, and that at the time having been the second book anywhere on Earth printed cover-to-cover on the internet (the site was simplified and revised around 2022 after having been "on the air" so-to-speak for a quarter century is enough to warrant my page. Remember, in 1996 only 25k-30k websites were functioning at all; another 75k simply said "Under Construction."Secondly, in an 8 year federal case, pro se, which went to the del. District Court ('Carnivale v. Staub' Civ.No.08-764-SLR), the Federal Circuit (Appeal from the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office,Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 92047553 'Staub v. Carnivale) and the Third Circuit (Civil Action 1:08-cv-00764-SLR) I brought trademark law, specifically the 1948 Lanham Act regarding trademark protections into the computer age. The case is now cited throughout the country and established that tiny alterations in domain names is insufficient to protect against claims of trademark infringement. In turning to my page I see a few inaccuracies which have crept in over the years; my projects now number more than 700 across the U.S. (not 500) and my book is now self published rather than published by BookSurge. Having practiced for neary a half century (not quite but getting close) and having won nearly every preservation award there is in N.Y.C. (I am a very traditional architect with a strong interest in preserving historic architecture) I am not unknown and am, as much an architect as those listed under 'American Architects' - and on Staten Island, a place of 500,000 people, I can say that I am fairly well known.I do not know why someone moved me from "People from Staten Island" to "Artists from Staten Island"- that is inaccurate in that I am an architect, a retired college professor, a preservationist and an author - and architects, while they should be artistic, are part historians, part engineers, part mathematicians and part businessmen too- putting me in the 'artists' category is simply less accurate, if not inaccurate. I see someone called my page a "Puff Piece" which does not reflect I was the first pioneer of a major profession on the internet, and, acting pro se for 8 years in federal court, I altered trademark law regarding the internet. For these reasons, I ask that you might ne kind enough to enter my comments into the discussion for me, since I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. I may send this same message to another editor or two, but you are the first I've contacted....I thank you in advance, Sincerely yours, David Carnivale 2603:7000:6E3B:C199:B1A5:F394:7F02:6A17 ( talk) (transferred from User talk:Jevansen)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 03:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this discussion. For the IP editors identifying themselves as "David Carnivale", if you wish to continue to participate in this discussion, please keep comments concise and related to sources and Wikipedia policies, subjects that can impact whether or not this article subject (you) is considered notable by Wikipedia standards.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There is consensus that the article is based on a topic that has been discussed in reliable sources, and is thus not synth. There is also consensus that although the article may need cleanup (and a move to a new title might be appropriate), it is reliably sourced. The proposal to merge did not gain consensus, but this close is without prejudice to proposing a merge in the normal course. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Original research not suitable for an encyclopedia. A mathematical treatise with only a couple of references to basic facts the rest are heavily mathematized proofs and reasonings. Some people in the previous discussion argue that counterexamples are OK. Referenced counter-examples are OK. References demonstrate both correctness and notability of the content. The reader does not have to trust a wikipedian that the nontrivial math is correct. - Altenmann >talk 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
only a couple of references. And its content is obviously a wall of heavy original mathematical research. "Cranking through the math one finds that..." - sure thing, professor. Hold my beer. - Altenmann >talk 20:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
a wall of heavy original mathematical research. The only part that wasn't already backed up by sources explicitly discussing the specific examples given was the "Examples with support almost everywhere in " subsection. The "Cranking through the math" part was a tone problem, not a content problem, and that was easily fixed. Right now, the page is in deletion is not cleanup territory, I think. It might need further trimming and revising for proper encyclopedic tone, but the basic complaint of the nomination is unfounded. XOR'easter ( talk) 21:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
This article demonstrates that [...]is something of a heavy giveaway. The premise here is "I will make an argument", not "I will document a topic". This can be carried within an existing article because we have more leeway there to shape the structure of how information is presented, but it is quite unsuitable for a separate article. Make it a subsection under (or after) Independence (probability theory)#Examples, and it should be okay. Sentences like "it is sometimes mistakenly thought that" still require sourcing/attribution. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 06:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I see very different, opposing views of this article. Let's see if one relisting can bring a clearer consensus or another possible Merge target emerges.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Questionable for sustained notability with WP:RS Amigao ( talk) 23:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Beezer. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Nothing found which suggests there is independent notability to the inclusion standards beyond The Beezer, not clear this content could be supported fully with references per WP:V even if it was to be merged. WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt ( talk) 07:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Redirect. It could be redirected to The Beezer per ATD. Desertarun ( talk) 09:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Regretfully I can't find any evidence she meets WP:GNG. There is no obituary of her death in 1969 or anything about her life except for the 1928 book that has her as president of a Burbank club (not notable enough for its own article), which was not a national position. —Kaliforniyka Hi! 17:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 00:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Any more comments on the quality of additions since the article's nomination?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
An example is that a paragraph-long obituary of a scientist in a respected non-local national newspaper will be treated as more conducive of significant coverage than a paragraph-long obituary of an un-elected politician in a respected non-local national newspaper. A short obituary about an unelected politician in the Los Angeles Times doesn't convey as much significance as an obituary of the same length about a club woman like Jane Marks does, as such figures are less likely in general than politicians to get such obituaries at all. Also, WP:OHW guides my reading of the Women of the West entry; as a biographical dictionary, it has a compressed format
that conveys more information in fewer words. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 18:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete after a month of discussions and relistings. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:35, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is an ill-defined religious "movement". I doubt anyone identifies themselves as a Reformed fundamentalist. That's not necessarily fatal, but makes it harder to identify what the group is. You can google "Reformed fundamentalism" and find lots of hits, but many of them will be using it as a pejorative and foil for something else. I think it is possible that a phenomenon called "Reformed fundamentalism" exists as something that could be defined using reliable independent sources, but it would be difficult and this article does not even begin to attempt it. I think the current Christian fundamentalism page appears to do this quite well for that group, most of which would also not self-identify. But I think there are zero independent reliable sources in this article (even Packer is not independent), so I think the best course is WP:TNT. The article is original research sourced mostly to different groups and their beliefs, almost none of which identify themselves as "Reformed fundamentalists." The closest would be Packer's Fundamentalism and the Word of God, since Packer would identify as Reformed and wrote a book on fundamentalism. But even there Packer was writing a polemic to a broader audience than the Reformed world; he was not arguing for "Reformed fundamentalism" but Christian fundamentalism. Jfhutson ( talk) 13:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It looks like this might close as No consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Yury Dud#vDud. Liz Read! Talk! 08:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. This is an unusual situation; the subject is a YouTube channel. The creator (Yury Dud) is wp:notable primarily via unrelated areas. The references here barely even mention VDud much less GNG coverage and there really isn't coverage derived from them. This is basically nothing but a self-written catalog of the YouTube channel. The article on the creator seems to have encyclopedic coverage of vDud, but is also confusing, seeming to be covering unrelated things as being vD. IMO the tiny bit of enclyclopedic content here should be merged into Yury Dud. Someday if someone could get GNG references and derive content from them that might viable. North8000 ( talk) 19:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
1 sentence not notable •Cyberwolf• talk? 19:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Penang Transport Master Plan. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient for a standalone Star Mississippi 02:34, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
This is a proposed line, it has not been given any projected completion time and is not a final concept, though for some reason the article is written like it is a completed line. No sourcing beyond the regional government has been shown to give any coverage to this concept. It is clearly too soon to have an article on this proposed line given the lack of coverage in secondary sources. A basic BEFORE search turned up no further coverage. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
The line is scheduled for opening by 2045.This is not something we should be giving a dedicated article when it won't open for more than 20 years, per WP:CRYSTAL. This should be a paragraph within Penang Transport Master Plan. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please review recent changes to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Dance in Cambodia. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The WP:PROD was removed, but there are still no sources (of the three links one leads to a Khmer-page language describing a particular song, second one is dead, third one is to the video). I have spend reasonable time trying to locate reliable sources in English and Khmer (second one using translation tools) and came up empty. Викидим ( talk) 20:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment I can't find anything on it even in Khmer, except this and a brief mention here . Lots of videos on YouTube, TikTok and Facebook which would indicate cultural notability but we do need sources... This is about Thai students singing a song of the same name. Perhaps try different spellings and variations in searching? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 04:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
She fails WP:GNG as there is no sources covering her in depth. The article is created based on recentism because she just received nominal coverage due to her few days arrest and she being the daughter of a notable politician Shireen Mazari. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
off topic discussion
|
---|
|
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Hurricane Hugo. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Barely intelligible. From what I've gathered, a Hurricane Hunters flight had an engine failure in flight during a mission, but was still able to return to base and land safely, see Hurricane hunters#Other incidents. This does not merit a separate article. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 21:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Lack of notability - sole sources on the article are arcade database listings, KLOV is reliable per WP:VG/RS while Arcade History is unreliable. I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources demonstrating notability. Waxworker ( talk) 20:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already been PROD'd. Not eligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 22:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
If kept, this may need TNT'ing as it does seem promotional in places. Long-time unreferenced BLP - lots of roles, working actor, but i couldn't find the sources to show he meets WP:NACTOR / WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion due to previous AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 22:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 7 Aviation Support Battalion REME. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Insufficient sources have been provided to prove notability. This article is regarding a company-sized sub-unit. PercyPigUK ( talk) 22:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable topic, too many primary sources, + unreliable sources, few notable sources found online 2003 LN 6 22:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT as far as I can tell. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV that I found was this transactional announcement. JTtheOG ( talk) 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, an Australian rugby league player, to meet WP:GNG. Participation-based SNGs were deprecated in 2022 and BLPs require strong sourcing. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of preserved Southern Pacific Railroad rolling stock#Preserved steam locomotives. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I am unable to find any coverage of this locomotive in secondary sources. The source used for basically the entire article is a self-published website. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
*Delete. Per nom.
124.148.210.252 (
talk) 21:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:SOCKSTRIKE –
dudhhr
talk
contribssheher 22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
8-year orphaned permastub on a "technology entrepreneur" with a single middling reference. BD2412 T 20:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am having a hard time finding anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable Russian physicist. The article was created by its subject ( Okulov99 ( talk · contribs)), contains no references or sources confirming the subject's notability (expect of the publication list of the subject). It is basically a promotional page. Ruslik_ Zero 20:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. SNOW. And, to the IP editor, a "soft delete" is not possible if there is a single Keep vote and the discussion is unanimously Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. Agusmagni ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Rugby BLP that fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to 6 Regiment Army Air Corps. Sandstein 20:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion, the article is not notable. Only one reference is listed and it is not independent of the topic of the article. In the case of this article, the squadron is company-sized. PercyPigUK ( talk) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination.Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Of the current sources, the first was written by the subject himself, and the second is a brief mention quoted from a press release. A BEFORE check revealed some quotes and namedrops but little else. Let'srun ( talk) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.
As a Soft Deletion, this article could be restored if this absent chessplayer ever pops back up on the competitive chess radar. Liz Read! Talk! 01:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV needed to meet the WP:GNG. The sources in the article are all databases, and a WP:BEFORE check only comes up with passing mentions such as [ [11]]. Let'srun ( talk) 18:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Notes. Not voting one way or the other at this stage, just noting that he represented a large country (Canada) at chess, and most of his activity was in the 1960s where sources are not so easy to find on the internet. He played in 3 Canadian Championships. His Elo rating on the first FIDE list in 1970 was 2260, and it seems he didn't play any rated games after that. MaxBrowne2 ( talk) 07:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not a relevant subject for an article. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. This could well be regarded as suitable for deletion under speedy deletion criterion G4 (re-creation of a page previously deleted as the outcome of a deletion discussion), but it unambiguously qualifies under criterion G11 (advertising or promotion). JBW ( talk) 18:41, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NGO. Can't find any reliable or independent sources. Page was previously deleted as well. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 20:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG as it lacks the WP:SIGCOV to meet it. BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk | contributions) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. SNOW Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Violates WP:DICDEF. Occidental𓍝Phantasmagoria [ T/ C] 17:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
WP:MILL journalist, non-notable. Broc ( talk) 09:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 16:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance. Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
My PROD tag was removed, so here we are. This is an older duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance. As this award was divided into two categories from 2014 to 2023, the article is also partly a duplicate of Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Male and Black Reel Award for Outstanding Breakthrough Performance, Female. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was draftify. ✗ plicit 06:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:GNG. Technically meets the requirements at WP:NTENNIS through his wildcard in a local tournament but has no accomplishments as a tennis player that indicate notability. Adamtt9 ( talk) 15:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The page has a single source, and none of these are legitimate clubs. They are only teams that happened to be registered with that name, and seemingly never operated at any capacity outside of amateur tournaments that took place years ago. Yoblyblob ( Talk) :) 15:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Not yet notable per WP:NACTOR or WP:NSPORT, all film roles appear to have been minor roles so far. He's been in teams of several performers at the openings of national sports events, but this doesn't bring him over the line for WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Couldn't find any significant secondary coverage of him in English or Khmer, just passing mentions and social media. Declined three times at draft. Wikishovel ( talk) 15:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
— Songha_Mao ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Papaursa ( talk) 01:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. There was no discussion of the sources provided during the discussions, the delete rationales are not paritcularly strong, and there were a couple of merge suggestions. A merge discussion can be handled on the talk page. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 02:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Nothing in the article suggests this meets WP:NSOFT/ WP:GNG, and my BEFORE did not find anything useful ( WP:SIGCOV-compliant). Can anyone save this? Otherwise we can consider a redirect target, perhaps? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More participation needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. I'm WP:AGF here and following the assessment of the people who say they're subject matter specialists - not that there's anybody contradicting them or asking to keep the article. Sandstein 19:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This page is a reinvention under a different name of established metallurgy and materials science by a scientist at UCLA in 2018. Well before nanotechnology became a buzzword, metallurgists and material scientists were using structure at the nano size scale (mainly) deliberately in commercial materials, for instance steels and more recently superalloys. There is nothing in this article which is not already covered better elsewhere, both within Wikipedia and outside. Beyond this the article also has structural problems with much of it a list that is not expanded upon, and many parts are written as WP:CRYSTAL and/or WP:OR, although I think much (most?) of what is here is already established science. Neither Wikipedia nor scientists should be reinventing the wheel. (Yup, this page does annoy me!) Ldm1954 ( talk) 06:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 07:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Shadow311 (
talk) 15:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. Discussion about splitting may continue on the article's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 23:22, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Grossly out-of-date and incomplete. Even if the list WERE complete AND up-to-date, there is no lead section, no cited sources, AND no explanation why this list is encyclopedically notable. In the current form, it will never meet the requirements of a quality list article on Wikipedia. I also don't really get the purpose of this article. For searching figure skaters, we have the category "figure skaters", which has the big advantage that newly-created biographies are automatically added there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article created by a clear WP:COI editor and fails WP:GNG, and WP:NSCHOOL. Redirect to British Schools foundation may be on the cards, but that article has notability concerns as well. Allan Nonymous ( talk) 14:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability standards in WP:NSPORT. In addition, no non-trivial sources are provided, and I could not find any. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 14:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Per WP:NSPORT, the existence of stat pages is not enough to prove notability. There are no other sources referenced, and nothing shows up in a search for news articles or other sourceable media. This article clearly doesn't meet the notability requirements. Kingsmasher678 ( talk) 14:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was convert to disambiguation page. Sandstein 19:42, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years. Not seeing substantial coverage of the topic in independent reliable sources needed for consideration against the inclusion criteria. JMWt ( talk) 14:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This appears to be just an Arabic dictionary definition for Nation. Both sources used are just for the English word. At one stage this was a redirect to Nation, but this doesn't meet the usual expectation for cross-language redirects of specific relevance. Also of note is that the ar.wiki article ar:قوم is not about Nation, but a short stub about something else. Originally this article was a redirect to Qawm, but it is not mentioned there and I'm unsure if that is also a cross-language redirect. CMD ( talk) 07:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG DonaldD23 talk to me 12:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No refs on the page for many years and claims on the page can be removed per WP:V. Not seeing notability outside of the author William S. Burroughs JMWt ( talk) 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 14:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL as he never won a national or provincial election, merely running for an election does not make one notable. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 12:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. The author was a blocked sock (G5), and it's snowing down below anyway. Girth Summit (blether) 12:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Does not pass WP:GNG / WP:BIO.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 07:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
An article about an individual that doesn't meet out
general notability guidelines for inclusion of
musicians,
actors and as the case may be. The sources doesn't seem to be significantly covered and per se, have more of PR and paid writing.
Safari Scribe
Edits!
Talk! 09:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Midnight's Children. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 13:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this topic is notable enough to have it's own page but the information would be useful as a small section in Midnight's Children. Perhaps under style or reception. (I hope this is the right way to go about this) Moritoriko ( talk) 04:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 06:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 09:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 10:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This camp seems to have received no significant coverage over its long history. A google brings up nothing but a couple of blogs and a press release, and a search of the newspapers.com archive only brings up advertisements in local newspapers, nothing that would contribute to GNG. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 06:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Desertarun (
talk) 09:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Almost entirely self-sourced to the website of purported DNS blacklists. I was unable to find much sourcing specifically about comparison of different blacklists, so I believe WP:LISTN is not met even if the NOR issues (i.e. categorization of different blacklists into reputable and "suspect" lists based on primary sources) could be overcome. I don't see any content with sufficient sourcing to preserve. ( t · c) buidhe 08:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Aranmanai 4. as an ATD. If you strongly object to this Redirection, feel free to take it to WP:RFD. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The sources are all about Aranmanai 4, but make no mention of "Baakghost" or "Baak" (except in one source "Baak" is mentioned but it appears to be a character from Aranmanai 4." A hoax? Cleo Cooper ( talk) 06:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Book of Mormon places. Liz Read! Talk! 07:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Wp:gng. This is an in universe location with little attention inside LDS circles, and none in independent reliable sources - especially no indepth coverage we could use to build an article
Big Money Threepwood (
talk) 05:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 05:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet and there are no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Per wp:notdict and wp:gng, this is a definition of an in universe phrase using only in universe sources. No secondary sources seem to have spent time writing anything in depth about the use of the phrase secret combination in Mormon culture
Big Money Threepwood (
talk) 04:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC) the nominator has been blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
No secondary sources seem to have spent time writing anything in depth about the use of the phrase secret combinationis not quite accurate. Looking through Google Scholar reveals the following:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 06:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
No indication this meets WP:GNG. Sources provided are primary/promotional in nature. Most substantial source I have been able to locate is this brief fluff interview with the editor. Triptothecottage ( talk) 04:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
This has been unsourced and has notability issues for over a decade. Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:GNG ZimZalaBim talk 03:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[
User:CanonNi]]'''
(
talk|
contribs) 04:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 04:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to A-ha. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG/ WP:NBIO, and I do not believe being a producer for a notable band is an automatic WP:NMUSIC pass either. I could not locate sources with substantial coverage of Ratcliff. All sources cover him only peripherally, as a producer for a-Ha. The article is now primarily an autobiography. Would accept a redirect to a-Ha as an alternative to deletion. Jfire ( talk) 03:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
I will take legal action if you have the cheek to remove this article", "
My lawyers will only reveal their legal expertise", "
before I wake up my lawyer and we can sort this out legally", and "
It will be very easy for me to find out who you really are" is not okay here. You need to avoid making statements that can be construed as legal threats or threats to reveal someone's identity.
Why am I having to justify facts that are common knowledge in my industry?" is a valid question. The answer is that one of the pillars of Wikipedia is that information here is verifiable: readers must be able to check that any information is not just made up. That means we can't rely on what's "common knowledge" in any industry unless it's been published in reliable sources somewhere. When your autobiography is published, we may be able to use it as a source in a-ha (depending on whether it is self-published or not). But we can't just rely on your own personal statements here, even if we believe them. Jfire ( talk) 04:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by
User:Sirfurboy
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.johnratcliff.com/john--a-ha | "In his own words". His own website. WP:SPS | ? Reliable but self promotional | ✘ No | |
https://web.archive.org/web/20220521024623/https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/ha-take-me | I believe it is. Didn't actually check. | He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him | ✘ No | |
https://thequietus.com/articles/18805-aha-hunting-high-and-low-take-on-me-review-anniversary | He is mentioned in the source several times but there is no significant information about him | ✘ No | ||
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/01727601 | A primary source that says nothing about Ratcliffe in any case | ✘ No | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
However the redirect is reasonable as this is clearly someone who gets a mention regarding a-ha and is borderline notable. Although the above assessment covers what is in the page, there could be more secondary sources on him. However the name is quite common and searching is complicated by finding other notable Jonh Ratcliffes. I was not able to find any suitable coverage, but if multiple independent reliable secondary sources with sigificant coverage can be found, then, of course, this would be a notable subject for a page. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 10:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 03:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK2/SK4, sock nom. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 04:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
This article has many wrong and disputed information like IkkJutt Jammu is different organisation in Jammu And ekam Sanatan Bharat Dal is different from it. Both organisation have officially different different social accounts and websites.pls delete it. Nishalover — Preceding undated comment added 10:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep, withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 01:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I tried to do WP:BEFORE, but it seems like this is the only sigcov [27] for this character. Meanwhile, others were just from game reviews with the same name, including the current sources used in the receptions section. Unfortunately, we need more to pass WP:GNG threshold. 🥒 Greenish Pickle!🥒 ( 🔔) 02:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
a distinctly Jewish gentleman. " Three best sources" is an essay rather than a guideline or policy, but for what it's worth this demonstrates there are three solid sources for the character's notability. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 07:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was merge to Terrorist incidents in Pakistan in 2017. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 03:08, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
The 2 sources provided are from time of event. No lasting coverage or impact to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar ( talk) 00:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 00:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk) 02:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 00:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers as I am unable to find sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Saint Louis University (Philippines)#Academics. Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable subject. May need to be redirected to Saint Louis University (Philippines). Sanglahi86 ( talk) 01:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)