The article European Federation of Animal Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ORG. There don't appear to be sufficient independent reliable sources to warrant an article for this organisation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
gobonobo
+
c 16:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Template:WPASIA10k has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Asia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Template:WPAFR10k has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Best, — a smart kitten[ meow 17:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Are you intending to comment at these discussions? The reason they were necessary is that you opposed the merge. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 13:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Alumni by university or college in the United Kingdom on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Animal breeds by colour indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China Navigation Company, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Navigation Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am about to create an article(a biography), but i saw that the pages of the title have recently been deleted/removed, the last action was by you, so i just wanted to ask if there is any specific reason behind it(coz many articles that people tried to create about the same person have been removed), is it like they were writing incorrect and unreliable information there? or is it controversial? Just confirming with you so that i can go ahead with creating the page.
This is the page that was deleted by you. 22:34, 14 November 2023 Justlettersandnumbers talk contribs deleted page Manoj Jarange Patil (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace)
or you can just visit this link and see the log https://en.wikipedia.org/?action=edit&title=Manoj+Jarange+Patil&create=Create+page AnalyserOP ( talk) 09:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I note that you sent this for G11, which was declined. You may wish to influence its fate either way at AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Just a quick query that I’m hoping you can help me with…
Back on 2/1/24 you reverted a promo/copyvio edit on the page for Legal & General. The text of that edit is now no longer on the article history (presumably due to the copyvio).
The reverted editor has now declared a COI and has attempted to make a complete rewrite of the lead part of the current article via a request at the talk page (i.e. following the correct process).
I wonder if you could take a look and let me know if the new request bears any similarity to the material that you previously reverted.
Any assistance gratefully received. Axad12 ( talk) 09:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I edited the page after this deletion banner and I am sure this time it is not advertising. And I wanted to know page is well cited and I have added lots of refrences so, Why you delete the page. Will you please help me regarding it? Humaira28 ( talk) 16:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I am hardly a beginner, but thank you for your editing for beginners link. I do believe you have made a mistake, but I simply don't care enough to take on a battle I will lose. An editor removed a large amount of material and deleted a page, leaving a note that any of the deleted information could then be incorporated into a main article that was remaining in place. The text you do not like refers to plot lines and character traits. Anything that can only truly be confirmed by actually watching the episodes being described. There are literally THOUSANDS of wikipedia articles with plotlines and character details that are not referenced and nor can they be. They are character descriptions. Plot lines. Unreferenceable. I note you have not deleted the main article pages for the characters in Absolutely Fabulous, none of which are referenced. The edits in question you do object to are sub articles of that same page. You have merely decided to select this one page and this one attempt to reinstate text that existed for many years on wikipedia without concerning anyone. I am sure you are now working hard on every page relating to every movie and every TV series that exists on wikipedia to remove all unreferenced plot lines and character traits. A mammoth task and I wish you well with that undertaking to ensure that the guidelines are followed to the letter in every single article mentioning any fictional character. It could take years. Good luck! MWEditorial ( talk) 21:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Why did you remove my article? What factual error was there? Anponline ( talk) 13:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I have declined your G11 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Young Jimmy. It is obvious that the draft was created for the purpose of promotion, but I don't think that the actual content of the page is so blatantly promotional as to justify speedy deletion. The speedy tag was on the article for more than 2 days, which is sufficiently unusual to make me suspect that I was far from being the only administrator who was reluctant to decline the deletion because it's the kind of thing that should be deleted, but unwilling to actually delete it because it doesn't really satisfy any of the speedy criteria. JBW ( talk) 17:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you rolled back some of my alternate accounts edits. I came across said citation whilst studying and added it to the articles to help either expand them with new content or to add as a secondary citation to already sourced claims.
I don't have any affiliation with that specific textbook beyond using it in my study.
If adding similar content like that to multiple articles is disallowed under another policy I will refrain from it but I don't see it as being ref spam. Traumnovelle ( talk) 09:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
i observe my page had a delete request by you @ Justlettersandnumbersj and was eventually deleted. i would like to inquire the reason for this actoin Coding4kidshub ( talk) 20:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Could you please stop rejecting every edit for my Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.48.187.197 ( talk) 13:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
What would it take for you to leave a page alone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcangel27 ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Justlettersandnumbers, you recently deleted my article from my user page claiming that I am using Wikipedia as a free web-hosting service.But if you would have took the effort to translate a little bit of it, you might have realised that it is a draft for a translation I was making for the actual article " David Goggins" . I was still working on the translation of the article. Kindly remove the ban or whatever it is, as i invested a lot of time in translating the article. You can contact me if you need to talk to me. Thanks AkProto ( talk) 04:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, several of my very old articles have been deleted in a very short timespan. I have done lots of hard work to make these articles. They have stood the test of time for 10 years. Then they have been promoted for speedy deletion, and are gone in seconds. It would be better to mark them as undersourced and give a timely deadline for when they must be improved, e.g. a week. It is unreasonable to require editors to make such improvements within this short amount of time. I think you are misunderstanding Wikipedia's guidelines. The requirements you refer to for notability are sufficient, but not necessary for an article to be notable. Your selective choice of articles that you promote for deletion makes it appear that you are on a crusade against the IPSC. Sauer202 ( talk) 11:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I think this is the totally wrong way forward if we are going to encourage to improve articles. It is a cumbersome process involves so many persons on Wikipedia nominating, deleting, requesting, not restoring, justifying, restoring anyway but to draftspace, drafting, reviewing, not good enough despite how many sources, draft again, wait 6 months, and the contributor is not interested in contributing anymore because life. Why is it so hard to give contributors an opportunity, e.g. mark an article as undersourced etc. and give like 7 days to improve it? I am not interested in Draft space, that is the black hole of Wikipedia. What goes in there takes half a year to get out again, if ever, no matter how good the article is. It seems some patrollers or whatever functions they are lose eyesight and go on power trips now and then. Then again they don't last many years here in Wikipedia. I'm not going to bother. Do whatever you want. Sauer202 ( talk) 20:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I would argue that a photo of the bull-breeding brothers who run Miura and have for decades, indeed the only one of the brothers with their matador nephew, and more importantly the only one at all of their bull-ring on their ranch in the background, is not tangential in its relevance but central. Best, LG LucyGould ( talk) 15:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you delete my user page and lock it from being created again please, as you did here on 23 April 2023? Someone created a user page for me without me wanting it. Helper201 ( talk) 07:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Please undelete File talk:Influencegraph.PNG. As far as I can tell it isn't eligible for G8 as the base page exists. There's a version with actual content in the history to revert to. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I restored what you had deleted, as the article has been reverted to draft status. Background: the creating editor had converted this from draft to mainspace, draftified by New Pages Patrol, creating editor did it again, and again draftified. Given current draft status, creating editor should be allowed to attempt to add references. In my opinion, Abbas does not meet GNG, and if creating editor goes for mainspace again, deserves AfD. David notMD ( talk) 21:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Justlettersandnumbers, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Kavya Kishor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G5: substantive contributions from other editors. This is the fourth time removing a CSD tag from this page, do not tag it again. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
See [1]. Your edit summary mentioned "better images," but nothing about the removal of this cited and linked source. What was the reason for its removal? Thanks, -- Ooligan ( talk) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ Justlettersandnumbers Hope you are doing well.
I created a draft in the public space so that if there is any other editor who want's to work on the subject could improve... I did submit a draft before and it was rejected, and I wanted to be extra careful with the Arcadia School's draft. I was also thinking of getting help from teahouse as well. I do know that the draft had promotional language, all I did there was gathered the information from different sources and structured them. I didn't even cite any of the sources.
I have talked to the person who nominated the Draft, he says that I should ask you for the recovery of the page. Would you please restore the Draft, so I can work on it. I promise you I won't submit it till it is in accordance to the Wikipedia policies.
Also, if their is any advice you can give me in accordance, I will be utterly grateful.
Thank you. Annika59 ( talk) 00:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The whole article Ralf Schwarzer is copied from https://en.everybodywiki.com/Ralf_Schwarzer, I am unable to tag this page for copyright violation as everybodywiki is blocked on Wikipedia. Grabup ( talk) 08:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
You recently deleted the article stated above for not being notable enough yet I provided multiple articles which indicate the channel’s claim of significance. ( Discopleasant ( talk) 22:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC))
Hello, I've found what I believe may be a copyright violation (The user's other, very similar edit involved copying). I do not have access to the source to verify if the content is a copy right violation or not. I'm unsure of what to do in this situation and I know you are familiar with dealing with copyright violations.
Here's the edit/diff in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Veterinary_dentistry&diff=prev&oldid=1083867824 Traumnovelle ( talk) 21:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Subvalvular_aortic_stenosis_(canine)&diff=prev&oldid=932080046
Pl lease forgive me if this is not the right way to contact you or if I'm breaking some faux pax but what happened to the Veterinary Dentistry article? It's completely gutted. The only thing remainiare headings. Are you currently working on this? Am I just jumping the gun and you'll put it back together? Can you let me know when you're done with changes? I am upset because I've invested many hours over the course of 6 years in this article and it appears to be poofed info oblivion. n. MarialeegRVT ( talk) 15:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
MarialeegRVT, you are simply being informed that Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously, that such violations must be removed promptly when discovered, and that all editors must comply with copyright policy. Cullen328 ( talk) 22:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you please advise how to get this page deleted, it is talking about me without authorization Ahmaddarwish74 ( talk) 13:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
The article European Federation of Animal Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ORG. There don't appear to be sufficient independent reliable sources to warrant an article for this organisation.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
gobonobo
+
c 16:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Template:WPASIA10k has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Asia. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Template:WPAFR10k has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Best, — a smart kitten[ meow 17:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Are you intending to comment at these discussions? The reason they were necessary is that you opposed the merge. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 13:03, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 6 § Category:Alumni by university or college in the United Kingdom on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Animal breeds by colour indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article China Navigation Company, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Navigation Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am about to create an article(a biography), but i saw that the pages of the title have recently been deleted/removed, the last action was by you, so i just wanted to ask if there is any specific reason behind it(coz many articles that people tried to create about the same person have been removed), is it like they were writing incorrect and unreliable information there? or is it controversial? Just confirming with you so that i can go ahead with creating the page.
This is the page that was deleted by you. 22:34, 14 November 2023 Justlettersandnumbers talk contribs deleted page Manoj Jarange Patil (R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace)
or you can just visit this link and see the log https://en.wikipedia.org/?action=edit&title=Manoj+Jarange+Patil&create=Create+page AnalyserOP ( talk) 09:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
I note that you sent this for G11, which was declined. You may wish to influence its fate either way at AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi,
Just a quick query that I’m hoping you can help me with…
Back on 2/1/24 you reverted a promo/copyvio edit on the page for Legal & General. The text of that edit is now no longer on the article history (presumably due to the copyvio).
The reverted editor has now declared a COI and has attempted to make a complete rewrite of the lead part of the current article via a request at the talk page (i.e. following the correct process).
I wonder if you could take a look and let me know if the new request bears any similarity to the material that you previously reverted.
Any assistance gratefully received. Axad12 ( talk) 09:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I edited the page after this deletion banner and I am sure this time it is not advertising. And I wanted to know page is well cited and I have added lots of refrences so, Why you delete the page. Will you please help me regarding it? Humaira28 ( talk) 16:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I am hardly a beginner, but thank you for your editing for beginners link. I do believe you have made a mistake, but I simply don't care enough to take on a battle I will lose. An editor removed a large amount of material and deleted a page, leaving a note that any of the deleted information could then be incorporated into a main article that was remaining in place. The text you do not like refers to plot lines and character traits. Anything that can only truly be confirmed by actually watching the episodes being described. There are literally THOUSANDS of wikipedia articles with plotlines and character details that are not referenced and nor can they be. They are character descriptions. Plot lines. Unreferenceable. I note you have not deleted the main article pages for the characters in Absolutely Fabulous, none of which are referenced. The edits in question you do object to are sub articles of that same page. You have merely decided to select this one page and this one attempt to reinstate text that existed for many years on wikipedia without concerning anyone. I am sure you are now working hard on every page relating to every movie and every TV series that exists on wikipedia to remove all unreferenced plot lines and character traits. A mammoth task and I wish you well with that undertaking to ensure that the guidelines are followed to the letter in every single article mentioning any fictional character. It could take years. Good luck! MWEditorial ( talk) 21:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Why did you remove my article? What factual error was there? Anponline ( talk) 13:56, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I have declined your G11 speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Young Jimmy. It is obvious that the draft was created for the purpose of promotion, but I don't think that the actual content of the page is so blatantly promotional as to justify speedy deletion. The speedy tag was on the article for more than 2 days, which is sufficiently unusual to make me suspect that I was far from being the only administrator who was reluctant to decline the deletion because it's the kind of thing that should be deleted, but unwilling to actually delete it because it doesn't really satisfy any of the speedy criteria. JBW ( talk) 17:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk ( talk) 08:00, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you rolled back some of my alternate accounts edits. I came across said citation whilst studying and added it to the articles to help either expand them with new content or to add as a secondary citation to already sourced claims.
I don't have any affiliation with that specific textbook beyond using it in my study.
If adding similar content like that to multiple articles is disallowed under another policy I will refrain from it but I don't see it as being ref spam. Traumnovelle ( talk) 09:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
i observe my page had a delete request by you @ Justlettersandnumbersj and was eventually deleted. i would like to inquire the reason for this actoin Coding4kidshub ( talk) 20:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Could you please stop rejecting every edit for my Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.48.187.197 ( talk) 13:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
What would it take for you to leave a page alone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcangel27 ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Justlettersandnumbers, you recently deleted my article from my user page claiming that I am using Wikipedia as a free web-hosting service.But if you would have took the effort to translate a little bit of it, you might have realised that it is a draft for a translation I was making for the actual article " David Goggins" . I was still working on the translation of the article. Kindly remove the ban or whatever it is, as i invested a lot of time in translating the article. You can contact me if you need to talk to me. Thanks AkProto ( talk) 04:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, several of my very old articles have been deleted in a very short timespan. I have done lots of hard work to make these articles. They have stood the test of time for 10 years. Then they have been promoted for speedy deletion, and are gone in seconds. It would be better to mark them as undersourced and give a timely deadline for when they must be improved, e.g. a week. It is unreasonable to require editors to make such improvements within this short amount of time. I think you are misunderstanding Wikipedia's guidelines. The requirements you refer to for notability are sufficient, but not necessary for an article to be notable. Your selective choice of articles that you promote for deletion makes it appear that you are on a crusade against the IPSC. Sauer202 ( talk) 11:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
I think this is the totally wrong way forward if we are going to encourage to improve articles. It is a cumbersome process involves so many persons on Wikipedia nominating, deleting, requesting, not restoring, justifying, restoring anyway but to draftspace, drafting, reviewing, not good enough despite how many sources, draft again, wait 6 months, and the contributor is not interested in contributing anymore because life. Why is it so hard to give contributors an opportunity, e.g. mark an article as undersourced etc. and give like 7 days to improve it? I am not interested in Draft space, that is the black hole of Wikipedia. What goes in there takes half a year to get out again, if ever, no matter how good the article is. It seems some patrollers or whatever functions they are lose eyesight and go on power trips now and then. Then again they don't last many years here in Wikipedia. I'm not going to bother. Do whatever you want. Sauer202 ( talk) 20:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I would argue that a photo of the bull-breeding brothers who run Miura and have for decades, indeed the only one of the brothers with their matador nephew, and more importantly the only one at all of their bull-ring on their ranch in the background, is not tangential in its relevance but central. Best, LG LucyGould ( talk) 15:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Can you delete my user page and lock it from being created again please, as you did here on 23 April 2023? Someone created a user page for me without me wanting it. Helper201 ( talk) 07:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Please undelete File talk:Influencegraph.PNG. As far as I can tell it isn't eligible for G8 as the base page exists. There's a version with actual content in the history to revert to. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:03, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I restored what you had deleted, as the article has been reverted to draft status. Background: the creating editor had converted this from draft to mainspace, draftified by New Pages Patrol, creating editor did it again, and again draftified. Given current draft status, creating editor should be allowed to attempt to add references. In my opinion, Abbas does not meet GNG, and if creating editor goes for mainspace again, deserves AfD. David notMD ( talk) 21:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Justlettersandnumbers, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Kavya Kishor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G5: substantive contributions from other editors. This is the fourth time removing a CSD tag from this page, do not tag it again. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 17:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
See [1]. Your edit summary mentioned "better images," but nothing about the removal of this cited and linked source. What was the reason for its removal? Thanks, -- Ooligan ( talk) 18:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ Justlettersandnumbers Hope you are doing well.
I created a draft in the public space so that if there is any other editor who want's to work on the subject could improve... I did submit a draft before and it was rejected, and I wanted to be extra careful with the Arcadia School's draft. I was also thinking of getting help from teahouse as well. I do know that the draft had promotional language, all I did there was gathered the information from different sources and structured them. I didn't even cite any of the sources.
I have talked to the person who nominated the Draft, he says that I should ask you for the recovery of the page. Would you please restore the Draft, so I can work on it. I promise you I won't submit it till it is in accordance to the Wikipedia policies.
Also, if their is any advice you can give me in accordance, I will be utterly grateful.
Thank you. Annika59 ( talk) 00:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The whole article Ralf Schwarzer is copied from https://en.everybodywiki.com/Ralf_Schwarzer, I am unable to tag this page for copyright violation as everybodywiki is blocked on Wikipedia. Grabup ( talk) 08:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
You recently deleted the article stated above for not being notable enough yet I provided multiple articles which indicate the channel’s claim of significance. ( Discopleasant ( talk) 22:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC))
Hello, I've found what I believe may be a copyright violation (The user's other, very similar edit involved copying). I do not have access to the source to verify if the content is a copy right violation or not. I'm unsure of what to do in this situation and I know you are familiar with dealing with copyright violations.
Here's the edit/diff in question: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Veterinary_dentistry&diff=prev&oldid=1083867824 Traumnovelle ( talk) 21:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
::
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Subvalvular_aortic_stenosis_(canine)&diff=prev&oldid=932080046
Pl lease forgive me if this is not the right way to contact you or if I'm breaking some faux pax but what happened to the Veterinary Dentistry article? It's completely gutted. The only thing remainiare headings. Are you currently working on this? Am I just jumping the gun and you'll put it back together? Can you let me know when you're done with changes? I am upset because I've invested many hours over the course of 6 years in this article and it appears to be poofed info oblivion. n. MarialeegRVT ( talk) 15:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
MarialeegRVT, you are simply being informed that Wikipedia takes copyright violations seriously, that such violations must be removed promptly when discovered, and that all editors must comply with copyright policy. Cullen328 ( talk) 22:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Could you please advise how to get this page deleted, it is talking about me without authorization Ahmaddarwish74 ( talk) 13:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)