Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Hey! I am trying to get an article that I maade yesterday retreieved. It was delteted -- Basketball2024 ( talk) 19:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Basketball2024 See thread just above, I tried asking the editor who deleted it, but no response yet. You can also try reading WP:REFUND. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 19:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you! I've done everything listed. I just need the content back.. Basketball2024 ( talk) 20:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

It seems you had a reply at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#User:Basketball2024/sandbox. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 20:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC) reply

See my talk/Film ? MinorProphet ( talk) 18:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ MinorProphet The secret message can self destruct now, thanks. Damn, I haven't used that program in ages. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC) reply

How to add a picture -- Punachar ( talk) 18:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Punachar A specific picture of her you have taken yourself, or just a picture of her in general you found online like these? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC) reply

There are many public government photos of her. I also have pictures of her as well as her family. Punachar ( talk) 00:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Punachar Ok. Pictures you have actually taken yourself and US-gov pictures (as in "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties") can be uploaded on Commons, it's where WP keeps most pics. Start here If it's a picture you have actually taken yourself, you choose "Yes it's my own work", but only then. If it's a US-gov you mark it with Template:PD-USGov, or a more specific one if you can find it. See under "Usage" on that page how to write it in wikitext.

When the picture is on Commons, it can be added to the WP-article. Hope this helps. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 07:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Note however that state-government stuff may have different rules than US-gov, it's a complex area. I don't know if that's relevant here, but if it is, you can ask about it at Commons:Help desk. If there are no Commons-acceptable pics of her, we can add one on en-WP anyway, since she is no longer with us, but the process is a little different. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 10:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello!

A section in the article /info/en/?search=Muhammad_and_the_Bible was recently removed with the following rationale: "Needs decent independent secondary sources, not the religious texts themselves see WP:RSPSCRIPTURE." Sources I cited were from Baha'i interpreters ('Abdu'l-Baha, Shoghi Effendi) and not primary religious sources. However, as I don't write many articles I would like to ensure that this sections is in compliance with reliable sources. The purpose of the section is to state the Baha'i religion's perspective on the subject matter. Please let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions on how to make the article more useful. Thanks! FortisVault ( talk) 15:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I'll comment on article talk. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Bir sayfayı farklı bir dile çevirirken şablon ve kaynakça çevirmelerinde sorun çıkıyor, Sebebi nedir? -- Muhammed Şamil Özcan ( talk) 16:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Muhammed Şamil Özcan, perhaps you can find something helpful at Wikipedia:Translation. Also, on English Wikipedia you are supposed to use English, since it's the "local" language. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

For helping religious articles, I hereby award Gråbergs Gråa Sång with the “ Cool Award.” Dr Jackson is not rweal ( talk) 20:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I guess SCP can be seen as a religion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 21:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

No i mean for the hindu Christian stuff Dr Jackson is not rweal ( talk) 21:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Ah. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 21:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I would like to create an article. I can I do that? -- Xhaoshua ( talk) 18:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Xhaoshua It depends. Creating an acceptable WP-article without having done any WP-editing before is difficult. WP:TUTORIAL is a good intro on how to edit.

Start with reading WP:BACKWARDS. If you conclude "Yeah, I have those sources, no problem!" move on to Help:Your first article. Hope this helps. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I didn't understand one thing that I edited article Gaguzia conflict and gave proper citations but it got removed for some reason -- Waleed Ukranian ( talk) 14:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The first step in any WP-dispute is to try to discuss the matter on the talkpage of the article in question, in this case Talk:Gagauzia conflict. See also Help:Edit summary. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 15:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Gråbergs Gråa Sång, I am trying to improve the page on Joey Wat in conformity with WP:COI (I work for her employer). On the article's talk page, I proposed an expanded early life section for consideration. User Ipigott just approved some other additions, but said he would prefer not to be the only editor active on the page. Would you be willing to review the proposed expansion as an impartial editor? The draft adds more details about her upbringing in China and her academic background. Coreyhcooper ( talk) 01:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Replied at Talk:Joey_Wat#Proposed_expansion_of_Early_Life_and_Education_section. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 10:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒ SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 16:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

How do I tag my own articles How can I change it, for some addition or to the part How can I mark heading -- Rana Muhammad Wasif Khan ( talk) 02:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Rana Muhammad Wasif Khan if you are here to try to write a WP-article about yourself, don't bother, it's a waste of time. On how to edit, start with reading WP:TUTORIAL carefully. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 08:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello how do I add citations for references on wiki page I'm creating , -- Android182003 ( talk) 01:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Android182003 See WP:TUTORIAL. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 06:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I am here to ask why you keep removing the DOB from CaseOh? There are not just one, but multiple sources present in the article that state his birthday along with the fact that he has confirmed that is his birthday on his streams before. Thanks. Antny08 ( talk) 14:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply

WP:DOB. No non-crappy ref, no DOB. They are acceptable if there is a WP:BLP-good source, but they are not gold to be mined. It's fine to have articles without them. If you have a video where he says "I was born May 9, 1998", that's fine, cite it. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 14:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please read the information and consider withdrawing the nomination, I spent so long on this article and I don’t know if I can stay on Wikipedia if it gets deleted. Antny08 ( talk) 14:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Maybe instead of deleting we could draftify the article until more sources are released? Please, I do not want this article to be permanently deleted. Antny08 ( talk) 14:58, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You can suggest it at the afd if you like (draftify). Even if it is deleted, WP:REFUND is available if useful. Deletion is not necessarily permanent, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Markle. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 15:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Okay, I suggested draftication. Antny08 ( talk) 15:07, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I commented that I don't mind. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 15:11, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I have one question, according to WP:SNG and WP:Notability, it says the subject does not need to meet WP:GNG if it meets WP:SNG. For WP:ANYBIO, it says they are notable if they won a significant award, or were nominated for multiple significant awards. CaseOh was nominated for 3 different awards at the Streamer Awards and won one of them. This event had 645,000 concurrent viewers, and was broadcasting everywhere online during its airing. It is a very popular event with many famous people attending and watching. I believe this proves the notability. Please let me know what you think. Antny08 ( talk) 16:01, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

That section says "People are likely to be notable if..." That means that if they meet those criteria, WP:GNG/ WP:BASIC sources are likely to be around. According to some afd-comments so far, they are not. Editors may have different views on if Streamer Awards counts as "well-known and significant award". For one thing, it's very new, and mainstream coverage of it, like CNN etc, seems to be somewhat lacking. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I see, but WP:Notability states "

A topic is

presumed

to merit an article if:

1. It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG); and
2. It is not excluded under the What Wikipedia is not policy."

The first one states that it can either meet the GNG guidelines or the SNG guidelines. It doesn't say it has to meet both. The article meets the SNG guidelines, so I believe that makes it notable. Antny08 ( talk) 17:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

No. It doesn't meet the SNG WP:BASIC. ANYBIO says people with, say, an Oscar or a Pulitzer, probably meets WP:BASIC, but not necessarily so. A 2022 award by QTCinderella is, IMO, quite obviously not an Oscar or Pulitzer. People can disagree on if it's close enough, but it seems to have failed to generate any WP-good coverage so far. Feel free to seek other views. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The WP:BASIC is for the general notability guideline. To meet SNG, all you need to do is prove that they won a significant or well-known award. The creator of the Streamer Awards doesn't really matter, its the event that matters. Once again, the awards reached 645,000 concurrent viewers this year, so obviously it is pretty popular. I also noticed that WP:ANYBIO says significant OR well-known award. Wouldn't the gold playbutton fall under the well-known category? It is very well known, and it might not be as rare as a nobel prize, but it is pretty significant. And once again, WP:ANYBIO does not specify how large an award has to be, it doesn't say it needs to be as major as a noble prize or an oscar or a pulitzer. Antny08 ( talk) 19:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

So, you have to get other people to agree with you that the awards you consider significant are significant. And again, significant awards, per Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Additional_criteria, only means that BASIC-sources are likely to be around. A Pulitzer-winner doesn't necessarily merit an article either, the in-depth RS sources have to be there. And if someone has a Pulitzer, they probably will be. Personally, I don't consider automatic YT-marks like play buttons significant for WP:N either. 645,000 concurrent viewers this year doesn't matter, an article about the event in Washington Post or The New Yorker does. If those articles consider 645,000 concurrent viewers this year to be interesting, then that number may be interesting in the WP-context. Without context, it's just a number. You mean it to sound impressive, but what are people supposed to think it's impressive compared to?

Those are my thoughts on this, and this discussion is quite irrelevant for the afd. I suggest you make your arguments there, the afd-closer is the one you need to convince. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 19:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello I did an article edit for a manga artists/writer but it was considered a stub. I was wondering if databases would be credible sources to add since I cross-refrenced two different ones to add to her article. -- ObssesivlyAnalytical ( talk) 06:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ ObssesivlyAnalytical Hello! Context matters a lot, and it will depend on what databases and what you intend to use them for in the article. In general, databases will not help the argument for WP:N, but they may have some use anyway, as a WP:EL if nothing else. Manga is not really my area, in your shoes I'd try asking for input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga or Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics. Hope this helps some. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 06:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Gråbergs Gråa Sång, many thanks for your help with the Jonathan Jacoby article. I'd like to ask you a couple of questions if I may:

• Could I get ProQuest access? If so, how?
• Do all academic qualifications mentioned in a Wikipedia article require a citation? In either case, how does one obtain evidence of such qualifications?

Thanks Misha Wolf ( talk) 12:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Misha Wolf Can you access [1]? If so, ProQuest is there. And a lot more.

Rule of thumb, in a WP:BLP you should cite everything. In a case like this, something WP:ABOUTSELF is probably good enough, like [2]. It's not perfect, people pad their CV:s, and it does NOT help with WP:N, but you can use it and if someone complains, deal with it then. One can also argue that if there is no independent RS, should it be in the WP-article per WP:PROPORTION? It's a judgement call. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 13:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks Misha Wolf ( talk) 13:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello! I am new here and very overwhelmed. The task I am seeking to accomplish is the creation of a Wikipedia page for my wife, Julie Reiber, who is a well regarded and recognized Broadway performer.

Can you tell me if the draft I submitted was correct? I honestly don't even know where to find it. I made sure to disclose my COI and to highly cite references. -- Wackypedia00 ( talk) 16:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Wackypedia00 Hello and welcome! So: as the first thing you do on Wikipedia, you want create an acceptable article (difficult)... about your wife (difficult squared). This is theoretically possible.

Very much to your credit, you've done an unusual amount of things right. There's a COI-declaration at User:Wackypedia00 (I will put one at Draft talk:Julie Reiber as well), you've put citations in the right places, MOSTLY avoided WP:PUFFERY (this is hard when you're writing about family etc) and you started and submitted the article as a draft. Basically, you're behaving just as "we" want you to in your situation, and that doesn't happen often.

A reviewer will, sooner or later, look at your draft and compare your sources to WP:N and WP:BIO. That is the fundamental difficulty to getting an article accepted, if the required sources aren't there, that's it.

Some suggestions:

• Check WP:LEAD. The lead is supposed to be a summary of the rest of the article, so rethink that part and move everything that is not that.
• MOS:DATED. Basically... Ok. I see now that another editor, @ ForsythiaJo, is working on the draft. I'll stop writing now, we'll see what happens.

Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi again, @ Gråbergs Gråa Sång. I've got on my screen three ProQuest hits you mentioned in relation to Jonathan Jacoby:

• NEW AGE REVOLUTIONARY
• Barak's Favorite Peace Group Loses Its Founder
• CQ News

When citing any of them, should I link to their ProQuest Web pages or do I need to (try to) find them out in the open?

I looked for CQ News in Wikipedia and found a CQ News but it doesn't seem to be the right CQ News. Oh, I've just found Congressional Quarterly and Roll Call. Should I be using one of those as the name of the publication? If so, which one? I see that ProQuest shows the publication title as "CQ News & Schedules". Is that what I should use? If so, which Wikipedia page should I link it to?

The CQ News article doesn't seem to have a title, unless the title is "CQ News". Is that correct?

Thanks! Misha Wolf ( talk) 13:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Not paywalled url:s are of course more reader-friendly if you can find them, but WP:PAYWALLED url:s are very much allowed.

It seems Congressional Quarterly is the one, or close enough. It does not seem to have a title, which, tbh, is a little weird. Also, you never have to ping someone at their own talkpage, it has no extra effect. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 16:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks Misha Wolf ( talk) 21:59, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Grabergs! I'm working on an article and I wanted to now your opinion. It's in my sandbox, but I'm not sure how to send it to you. Thank you and hope you're having a great day! -- Mismedios ( talk) 18:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Mismedios If you have published something in your sandbox/userspace I should be able to see it here [3], but I don't. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 18:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Gråbergs Gråa Sång, I wanted to check-in on Talk:Joey_Wat#Proposed_expansion_of_Early_Life_and_Education_section. I disclosed a COI and proposed an expanded Early life section. You had responded with a couple tweaks, which I have incorporated into the draft. I wanted to see if you felt the expanded draft was ready or had more feedback. No rush, just checking in. Coreyhcooper ( talk) 04:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi Gråbergs Gråa Sång, I wanted to check-in on this from last month. I disclosed a COI, proposed an expanded early life section, and made some small changes based on your feedback. Would love to know if you have any other feedback and/or if it's ready to go in the article. Many thanks. Coreyhcooper ( talk) 13:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi! Hope you're well, My name is Miguel and I've been using Wikipedia since forever but I'm a beginner when it comes to editing and making an article. I'm making an article for a international school I work for In Japan and I was tasked to make an article of the school in wikipedia. I've just started, my account is more than 5 days old, but I can't seem to move what I made to the main page. I hope you can help me. Thanks! -- Lovinternationalschool ( talk) 19:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Lovinternationalschool, welcome! Moving an article to mainspace requires WP:AUTOCONFIRM, and you haven't made the number of edits.

However, looking at your draft, you've made some very usual mistakes for someone in your position, and "we have" is a minor one. If you were to move it to mainspace, it would quickly be moved back or deleted. Some initial reading:

• WP:BACKWARDS
• Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing
• WP:NORG
• WP:COI

Hope this helps some. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 22:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi! Got it! Quick question, When you say "number of edits", does that mean edits done in the article I created? or edits in any article? Lovinternationalschool ( talk) 23:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Edits to any WP-page counts. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 07:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I was going to respond there with:

Isn't it difficult to get a herb into a cell? Perhaps if you buy it a couple of drinks...

but thought better of it. JoJo Anthrax ( talk) 10:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

"A virus is what we doctors call "Very, very small." So small it could not possibly have made off with the whole leg." Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 10:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello! I'm a newcomer to this side of WP, so I'm overly cautious when making major edits. I just wanted to ask regarding WP's verifiability policy.

One of the issues flagged on my favorite WP article is how it "may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject." I understand this is to prevent people from just quoting themselves and advertising opinions as fact.

However, does that policy apply to the history of an institution only the institution has records for? Suppose, no local historians bothered to publish an independent historical account of some provincial ABC institution. Can we cite, in reference, ABC's self-published historical record?

Thank you so much! -- RyanTahamid ( talk) 10:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ RyanTahamid Welcome! Yes... BUT. Consider WP:ABOUTSELF. You can source simple facts about an org to the org itself, but such content should not be a large part of the article. Our goal is to summarize independent WP:RS about whatever. If no independent source bothered to notice a certain fact, it's likely off-topic for WP ( WP:NPOV). Also, ABOUTSELF sources never helps the argument for WP:N. Hope this helps. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 10:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you so much! I will take this in consideration and begin asking historian friends if they know any third-person accounts of the institution. RyanTahamid ( talk) 11:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello- While I no longer find it worth wrestling with other editors in an effort to remove bias from Wikipedia, I will inform you that "most" does not mean "like about 51%": AHD, Cambridge. I find that "nearly all" adds an unnecessary tone of rejection that "most" does not, and so I saw the IP editor's change as an improvement. Eric ^talk 11:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

And I think "nearly all" is more inline with WP:FALSEBALANCE + source given. Call it an appropriate tone of rejection. It (saq) can be a fun topic though. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, just to let you know that I noted your comments undoing my previous edit and have reinstated a note of the historical inaccuracy with a smallish change to the Plot Summary, including a reference to the US Library of Congress post. Hope that meets with your approval! AlexAndrews ( talk) 19:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Replied at Talk:The_Merchant_of_Venice#Historical_error_in_plot. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 19:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Don't just throw the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to edits. If you want to take the "See Also" stuff out, fine, but there were a lot of solid minor edits that you just reverted while being too lazy to check for the good edits. Electricmaster ( talk) 05:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Actually, I did and reinserted some. The in-quote [,] punctuation was very weird IMO. I have no firm opinion on the $ thing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 09:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Further reply at Talk:Enhanced_Games#Recent_edits. Let's keep article issues at the article talkpage. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 09:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Can i do my own article about Civil air patrol -- Knoxxshyuwbduwbdw ( talk) 16:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Knoxxshyuwbduwbdw Wikipedia already has the article Civil Air Patrol, so I'm not sure what you are thinking about. That one is US-specific, are you thinking about something like Civil Air Patrol (Peru)? See WP:BACKWARDS and WP:Your first article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You do realize I hope, that now that you have stuck your ironic nose in on the recent peer review that you have let it be known you are following what's going on. It seems to me that sort of obligates you to make some actual comments. They don't have to be positive comments. If you see any problems, say so. Source checking would be a genuine gift - or punishment... But don't mess with me on this one. It's beginning to look like my life's work, and I have had headache after headache over it. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 14:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry to be annoying. Never think I don't respect your work on these articles. If I dare to read anything in it, I might do or say something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 14:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

It isn't you, it's me. I am grumpy and touchy about this frickin-frackin*#!! article. I was thrown off balance by one commenter who said the article didn't even deserve its GA, but I am now aware that he goes around making overblown claims on a regular basis. "I found a mistake! Let's delete the whole thing!" I am now better prepared for our next encounter, but I probably do still have a bit of a chip on my shoulder over it. I'm sorry. I don't mean to take out my frustrations on you. I just want to hit him about the head and shoulders until he goes away. That's all. No big deal right? You comment any way you want any time. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 16:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

That motto on your imaginary coat of arms has a lot of relevance, doesn't it? Good to talk to you, I felt I had to give a shoutout to Xover earlier today: User_talk:Xover#Hello!_I_miss_seeing_you_around. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

One of the actors who appeared in Upstart Crow as one of Shakespeare's children was in my very first class when I started teaching in London. She must be nearly twenty now, time flows on... Girth Summit _(blether) 08:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Cool! I had watched both that and Game of Thrones, but it wasn't until much later I realized that Gemma Whelan was in both. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 08:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I definitely wasn't her - I'm not that old! Girth Summit _(blether) 12:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

She wasn't Shakespeare's daughter either.

"In August 2020, on his 40th birthday, Culkin tweeted, "Hey guys, wanna feel old? I'm 40. You're welcome." The tweet became one of the most-liked tweets of all time, peaking at number 9." Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 12:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply