![]() |
The result was redirect to Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's individual. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
He competed at the 2004 Summer Olympics but did not win a medal. A WP:BEFORE search didn't bring up sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. An alternative to deletion could be Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's individual as he didn't compete in more than one event. Suonii180 ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Coverage is routine about funding. WP:CORP does not seem to be met. SmartSE ( talk) 23:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Neither recognized as the most trusted astrologer (it's the real Indian award), nor as a businessperson BoraVoro ( talk) 13:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
13:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This person simply does not exist. A total WP:HOAX. Thanks to @ Oceanh for bringing it to light.
Worst of all, the creator has edited lots of other articles, vandalizing some, at least including the subject's alleged brother. Most of the ensuing discussion should adress the actions of this user. Geschichte ( talk) 19:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and organization-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and music maker-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Children's Theatre Company. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a stub. Content should be merged into Children's Theatre Company and Theatre for Young Audiences The Savage Norwegian 21:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to North Carolina Court of Appeals#Former judges as a viable ATD since no further input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 03:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
the subject fails GNG, notability under NPOL is questionable but I could not find any RS with SIGCOV of the subject. The page was mainly a copy-paste job from official press releases and still reads like a promo piece. The only sources are a campaign website, a press release and ballotopedia. hroest 19:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Star Wars: Jedi Knight. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and Notability, probably the sources mostly based on rankings/listicles only I think. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 21:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. The subject has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Latvian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like this. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Macedonian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus which does not preclude a redirect if sourcing is found to be insufficient Star Mississippi 03:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 23:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A second opinion on these newly located sources would be helpful as well as an assessment if they provide adequate SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: third relist in hopes of more discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
20:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pikmin#Protagonists. Complex/ Rational 22:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and Notability, relying on RefBombing to try and give the semblance of some bulk to the article. There's little discussion about him as an actual character, and even the sources acknowledge he's essentially a blank canvas. It has the hallmarks of the same problems facing many other Smash Bros. character articles that were previously redirected, just with less overall salvageable information. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Atlus games , which has a consensus slight edge. Target can be adjusted as a matter of editorial judgement and doesn't require a relist Star Mississippi 03:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
There does not appear to have any sources about it, even after over a decade being tagged as having no citations. For a Japanese exclusive game it also having no Japanese article seems very indicative there is no notability to the game. GamerPro64 18:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to F-Zero#Plot which can be re-visited, target wise, as a matter of editorial judgement should a character list come into existence Star Mississippi 03:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and notability, relying on mostly small quick statements to try and give it any semblance of a body via WP:REFBOMB. We have a situation here where the sources *themselves* point out there's nothing to say about the character outside of the old meme regarding his voice lines, and even then trying to turn up discussion regarding them has been fruitless.
In the end, it's the same problem as many other Smash Bros. focused character articles. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No clear indications that sourcing or notability requirements are met; the additional sources presented in the keep !votes are similar to those already present. Complex/ Rational 22:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Aside from UPE concerns, the articles seems to be filled with articles that are paid for. Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the Governor of Lagos State; which does not pass the bar for WP:NPOL. As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL. Neither does Olayinka meet the general notability guidelines independently. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as sourcing is found to be insufficient. However, if someone wants this as a draft to rename and scope, just ping me. Star Mississippi 03:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable organization. I'm not seeing coverage that isn't PR-Newswire posts or first party. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late proposal to rename and re-scope the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep as it appears sourcing questions have been addressed Star Mississippi 03:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy G4 declined as one of the refs is newer than those in the original article - that's one of precisely two refs and is an obit in the South Whidbey Record - so an obituary in a newspaper that "serves the south end of Whidbey Island, beginning with the Island gateway of Clinton, where Washington State ferries dock after crossing Puget Sound from the mainland and Seattle" is the only additional claim of notability to that which was deemed insufficient in 2017. Still fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR with minor roles throughout. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 15:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Mentions in footnotes, nothing close to WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 1. Stephen J. Bottoms: The Theatre of Sam Shepard: States of Crisis. Cambridge University Press, 1998, ISBN 978-0-521-58791-4 (google.de [abgerufen am 6. Juni 2020]). |
IMDB entry | 2. ↑ Jim Haynie (IMDb). Abgerufen am 6. Juni 2020. |
Obit with the normal problems associated with obits. | 3. ↑ Jim Haynie: Feb. 6, 1940 - April 3, 2021. 2. Juli 2021, abgerufen am 27. Juli 2021 (amerikanisches Englisch). |
4. ↑ Post von seiner Ehefrau Maggie Causey auf Facebook. Abgerufen am 15. Juni 2021 (englisch). | |
Title indicates this is an obit, but not able to find anything on subject from the article or above link is blank. Editor above states "also listed him" and a mention in a list also fails WP:SIGCOV. | 5. ↑ Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: In Memoriam. Abgerufen am 15. Juni 2021 (englisch). |
The main reason why he did not get so many obituarys at the time of his death is that obviously this information wasn't given to the press for a long time.shows the problem with obits regarding WP:NPOV, WP:IS. // Timothy :: talk 08:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Why the page should be deleted: 1. No citations, exclusively primary sources, aside from a single metal.de review ( https://www.metal.de/reviews/underdark-in-the-name-of-chaos-14520/) I couldn't find anything abt this band. 2. There is a more notable band called Underdark from the UK which would better suit this page, albeit I can't just replace the content on the page y'know. So unless this gets the deletion go-ahead I can't write about the band. That is all. Chchcheckit ( talk) 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This overly bloated article on an obscure set of design principles followed by the Maharishi cult is bizarre to say the least, but it is more problematically being propped up by sources which are published in low-quality journals without outside notice we would normally require for tests of fringe notability. The one-off comments in mainstream sources that are quotemined in the article seem to be present for one purpose only: to make it seem like this is an encyclopedic topic when really it's just thinly veiled propaganda. We need to start weeding this WP:Walled garden, and I think starting with this article makes sense. jps ( talk) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was kept per comments. Recipients of Padma Shri are notable. The article has been vandalized. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NARTIST an autobiography whose only claim to notability is a failed verification to an award. Theroadislong ( talk) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Very unclear topic or notability. Draftifying to give the creator a chance to correct this had no result. Basically, we have an infobox and background section about a different event, we have one source which when one actually checks it out doesn't even mention the event, and another source not about this attack at all. So this is an unsourced and due to the lack of concrete info for me unverifiable article. If it can be verified, shown to be notable, and cleaned, fine (that's why I draftified it), but if not it needs to be deleted. Fram ( talk) 16:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
I searched and it does not seem to be notable (by the way there is a card game which I assume is not related as this article mentions tiles) Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails to general and company-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Richard Menta. as a viable ATD as at the moment Menta is not up foe deletion. Star Mississippi 03:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
It would appear to me that this website - it is online when I checked as part of WP:BEFORE is still active - fails any number of notability tests, including but not limited to WP:WEBPAGE, and WP:NCORP for relation to its parent companies or subsidiaries, such as they may be.
I note that
As always, please do prove me wrong about this!
Shirt58 ( talk) 🦘 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Zero third party coverage. Sohom ( talk) 14:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
yvanyblog (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
stub on an unnotable sportsperson. fails general notability guideline. sourced to databases (note: second source is completely dead). preliminary search for sources turns up nothing but unreliable sources and whatever this is. ltb d l ( talk) 12:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "謝天佑與曾文輝同是20歲,同是從小便希望可以成為職業足球員,還憧憬如外國球星般賺取豐厚報酬;可是入行後便發覺,現實與理想有很大距離,但兩人仍咬緊牙關,希望可在球圈踢出成績。... 5歲接觸足球,中一已夢想做職業球員的謝天佑,在流浪經過兩年青年軍時代後,獲提升到甲組,開始全職踢波,月薪4,000元;就算後來加到5,000元,間中有點獎金,只是從屯門乘車到市區練波已月花過千。 ... 從流浪轉會到港菁的謝天佑(左),今季操練較以往積極。"
From Google Translate: "Tse Tin Yau and Tsang Man Fai are both 20 years old. They both dreamed of becoming professional footballers since they were young, and they also dreamed of earning huge rewards like foreign stars. However, after entering the industry, they discovered that reality and ideals are very different. Although the distance was huge, the two still gritted their teeth and hoped to achieve results in the football circle. ... Tse Tin Yau, who started playing football at the age of 5 and had already dreamed of becoming a professional player in the first grade of secondary school, won the title of Wan after two years of wandering in the youth army. He was promoted to Group A and started playing wave full-time, with a monthly salary of NT$4,000. Even if it was later increased to NT$5,000, with occasional bonuses, just taking the bus from Tuen Mun to the city to practice wave already cost more than 1,000 yuan a month. ... Transferred from Wandering Tse Tin Yau (left), who arrived in Hong Kong, is training more actively this season than before.
The article notes: "昨晚在九龍灣公園上演的 1 場甲組聯賽又演 「全武行」,比賽末段流浪右閘謝天佑襲擊 大中球員盧俊傑後又與燕鳴昊 「肉搏」,結 果雙雙被逐。... 由於謝天佑言語上辱及盧俊傑的母親,盧母賽後大聲指罵流浪總監李輝立之餘又在 "
From Google Translate: "Last night, a League A match played at Kowloon Bay Park was another "all-out show". At the end of the game, the wandering right-backer Tse Tin Yau attacked the big player Lu Junjie and then had a "hand-to-hand" fight with Yan Minghao. [more discussion about Tse's involvement in the fight] ... Because Tse Tin Yau verbally insulted Lu Junjie's mother, Lu's mother loudly criticized the wandering director Li Huili after the game."
The article notes: "谢天佑 TSE Tin Yau 中场 31-07-1991"
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
American biomedical company fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH and basically WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
11:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete- Rather than having in-depth details about the organisation, the "coverage" usually consists of mentioning the research that was done. I fail to see the consistent, noteworthy coverage to meet subject-specific notability guideline for businesses and organisations demands. Fails NCORP. 2409:40F3:A:3510:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 03:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NACTOR. Google reveals various hits on another person of the same name who is a crypto CEO of some sort, and various other actors with the same first name, before this person even shows up (and it's a passing mention in a gossip rag). Sources in the article are gossip or primary. Previously deleted as A7 and G5, though I of course can't see why that is. Fermiboson ( talk) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eritrean Premier League. Star Mississippi 03:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No sources since 2011. It doesn't seem like it can be improved. When sources are available it can be recreated. Dl.thinker ( talk) 11:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Greenman ( talk) 17:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Minimally sourced. Reads like product advertisement. Kleuske ( talk) 10:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Hardly sourced. Reads like product advertisement. Kleuske ( talk) 10:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Canadian not notable diplomat with no indication of reliable sources. Delete Tls9-me ( talk) 10:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Chinese not notable chess player with no indication of reliable sources. Delete Tls9-me ( talk) 10:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "黄仁杰一直被称作中国国象界的新锐,是山东队重点培养的年轻棋手。作为2004年后出生的小将,黄仁杰的成绩也足够优秀,曾获得2018年世界青少年锦标赛超快棋赛14岁组第一名,2019年第四届全国智力运动会获国际象棋少年组个人及团体双料冠军,以及2021年获男子国象世界冠军分区赛中国区冠军。本次常规赛前八轮比赛中,黄仁杰取得5胜2平1负的不俗战绩,也是山东队的主要得分手。"
From Google Translate: "Huang Renjie has always been called a rising star in China's national chess world and is a young chess player that the Shandong team focuses on training. As a young player born after 2004, Huang Renjie's performance is also good enough. He won the first place in the 14-year-old group of the 2018 World Youth Championship Blitz, and won both the individual and team awards in the chess youth group at the 4th National Mind Games in 2019. Champion, and the China Champion of the Men's National Physics World Championship Division in 2021. In the first eight rounds of this regular season, Huang Renjie achieved a good record of 5 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, and is also the main scorer of the Shandong team."
The article notes: "尚不满16岁的黄仁杰是一位下棋认真、吃饭“不够认真”的少年。1月16日,第二届“滨海新区杯”国际象棋中国公开赛在天津结束了第六轮的争夺,赛后和小伙伴一起吃小火锅时,两人并不是面对面坐着边聊边吃,在火锅开锅前黄仁杰也没有像大多数同龄人那样拿出手机玩游戏,而是打开手机里的国际象棋棋局认真研究起来,... 在去年的第四届全国智力运动会上,黄仁杰代表山东队获得了少年男子个人和少年男子团体两枚金牌。"
From Google Translate: "Huang Renjie, who is not yet 16 years old, is a young man who plays chess seriously but is not serious enough about eating. On January 16, the second "Binhai New Area Cup" China Chess Open ended in the sixth round in Tianjin. After the game, when eating hotpot with friends, the two did not sit face to face and chat while eating. Before the hot pot started, Huang Renjie did not take out his mobile phone to play games like most of his peers. Instead, he opened the chess game on his mobile phone and studied it carefully... At the Fourth National Mind Games last year, Huang Renjie represented Shandong The team won two gold medals for the Junior Men's Individual and Junior Men's Team."
The article notes: "小将黄仁杰近来势头大好,2019年便帮助青岛城阳队以冠军之姿冲进甲级联赛。2021年初,黄仁杰代表兄弟队济南银丰队出战,夺取了第一届中国城市国际象棋联赛总冠军。今年五月底,黄仁杰在“华颐杯”2021年国际象棋男子世界冠军 分区赛(中国区)中,击败各路强手,登上冠军宝座,成功闯进世界杯。有诸多成绩在前,本次黄仁杰夺取新人王赛冠军,是意外之喜,也在情理之中。"
From Google Translate: "The young player Huang Renjie has been gaining momentum recently. In 2019, he helped the Qingdao Chengyang team enter the First Division as a champion. At the beginning of 2021, Huang Renjie played on behalf of his brothers team Jinan Yinfeng and won the first China City Chess League championship. At the end of May this year, Huang Renjie defeated various strong players in the "Huayi Cup" 2021 Men's World Chess Championship Division (China Region), ascended to the championship, and successfully entered the World Cup. With many achievements ahead of him, Huang Renjie's victory in the Rookie of the Year Championship is an unexpected surprise and is reasonable."
The article notes: "中国国际象棋协会消息,“瑞贝卡杯”2023年第三届中国国际象棋新锐赛23日在南京结束全部九轮争夺,最终黄仁杰夺得冠军,赵晨曦位列第二,奚奇获得季军。"
From Google Translate: "According to the China Chess Association, the "Rebecca Cup" 2023 Third China Chess Emerging Competition concluded all nine rounds of competition in Nanjing on the 23rd. In the end, Huang Renjie won the championship, Zhao Chenxi ranked second, and Xi Qi won the third place."
The article notes: "英伦和“00后”小将黄仁杰都需要从首轮打起。不过黄仁杰的对手美国棋手刘宇镇缺席首轮比赛,黄仁杰不战而胜,顺利进入第二轮。"
From Google Translate: "Both England and the "post-00s" young player Huang Renjie need to start from the first round. However, Huang Renjie's opponent, American chess player Liu Yuzhen, was absent from the first round. Huang Renjie won without a fight and successfully entered the second round."
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about a person that does not meet WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Not much about the subject to confer notability. Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable poet or writer, no mentions in Books other than being father of Abdul Qavi Desnavi. Just a father of notable person does not make him notable. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 09:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Promo piece on a non-notable private biz school. Published years ago, but IMO should never have got through AfC (accepted by a since-blocked sock). Cites only primary sources, and BEFORE finds nothing beyond the usual rankings, directory listings, sponsored content and social media. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT by some margin. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources are mostly not about the portal. Extremely poor and superficial coverage, delete. Tls9-me ( talk) 08:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
*Delete article based on passing mentions and lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.
Mccapra (
talk)
20:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Clear promotion, I've already removed not referenced parts with links to PR.com and other not reliable press-releases; the remaining few sources are not reliable and routine. Delete per not WP:NCORP Tls9-me ( talk) 08:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Brochure advertising article in the GRAITEC series. See coi report. No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 08:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The IP editor (or IP editors, but it looks like one) has put some work into defending the article, but providing more references which mention her and her books but do not give substantial coverage to her does not outweigh the policy-based arguments given by other editors for deletion. JBW ( talk) 20:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Every single reference in this article is a link to one of the many itemised published articles in the Literature and Bibliography section. A writer writes articles, so we really don't have notability. Everything else in here is WP:NOTCV. We have the publication of a book on Bali, but the grounds for notability for the work or its author are scant - vide being shortlisted for a redlinked prize. In total, we fail WP:GNG - despite the polish that has been invested here. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear sir/madam,
With all respect, the argument she has only written one book I believe doesn’t hold. She worked on it for seven years and was chosen as one of the best 5 history books of 2022 of the Netherlands. There is a fiction prize (Libris) and a non-fiction prize (Libris History Prize). In addition she writes for national newspapers. The fact there are translations of articles is not to blow things up but because a well known publisher in Belgium (de lage landen) has published those articles in multiple languages due to their significance. It makes them also accessible to people from multiple countries. In case you have more questions please let me know.
Kind regards and thank you for your non-paid effort to optimize Wikipedia!
Kind regards, Ewout — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.245.233.60 ( talk) 13:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
the argument she has only written one bookdoes hold. It would not hold if she had published a number of books different from one. The long work on the book was mostly the author's PhD studies and her dissertation research/writing. A well-received book is a career accomplishment. Let's appreciate that and not make it more than it is! gidonb ( talk) 01:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged for BLP sources since 2020, the only citation used is a self-published website. I wasn’t able to find any RS sources to fulfill WP:GNG PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 07:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 22:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates per se — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one. The office held is a local office and while some local officeholders can meet notability for a variety of reasons, including time in office (e.g. Robert L. Butler or Hilmar Moore) or being a local officeholder who qualifies under some other criteria (e.g. Rita Crundwell, Betty Loren-Maltese for crime). Notability is not inherited from Pramila Jayapal or Maya Jayapal. Possible redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Oregon.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist as this is looking like a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors interested in a possible Merge can start a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This attack has no need to be a standalone page outside of 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, where the three paragraphs on the attack can be easily accommodated, and where the material would sit in it broader context ( WP:PAGEDECIDE). Some of the detail here is poorly supported by the in-line citation and needs reworking. The only statement providing a firm casualty count at the time of this nomination, for example, actually failed verification, with the citation containing only a trivial mention of the attack. The number of injured is then a question mark: "many", and there is no count of the attackers either. Overall, between the thin detail / other content issues, and the lack of an obvious need for a standalone page, the page should be merged. Iskandar323 ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
In theory, this should meet WP:GEOLAND. However, I couldn't find the sources to confirm this or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Last AfD was 15 years ago and WP has developed stronger ideas of notability since then. There is no significant coverage of these relations which previous keep votes failed to address. Any relations can be covered in British Western Pacific Territories and History of Nauru. LibStar ( talk) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 06:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This article cites no sources and has no evidence of notability other than having a museum (which has its own article). The location itself is not notable. DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 02:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Datangshan is a hill and village in Xiaotangshan, Beijing, where it is mentioned. Xiaotangshan, Beijing is a possible redirect target if Datangshan found to be non-notable. Here are two sources I found:
The article notes: "北京城北约40里,有一座由三个山峰组成的独立小山,山形如笔架,因有温泉泉眼,被古人命名为“大汤山”。大汤山以西约一千米处,有三个低矮山丘,也有温泉,被称为“小汤山”。在因抗疫而被载入史册之前,小汤山就是著名的疗愈之地,并受到多位皇帝青睐,也是民国时的旅游胜地。"
From Google Translate: "About 40 miles north of Beijing, there is an independent hill composed of three peaks. The mountain is shaped like a pen stand. It was named "Datang Mountain" by the ancients because of its hot springs. About one thousand meters west of Datang Mountain, there are three low hills and hot springs, which are called "Xiaotang Mountain". Before it was recorded in history for its anti-epidemic work, Xiaotangshan was a famous healing place and was favored by many emperors. It was also a tourist attraction during the Republic of China."
The article notes:
From Google Translate:小湯山村發展成小湯山鎮,幾乎人所共知;殊不知還有一個鮮為人知的大湯山村,明代已經形成村落。村北有一個一百三十餘米高的山丘,與小湯山村一樣因山丘得名。原來大湯山村水資源豐富,山腳下有多處泉眼,泉水常年流淌不斷,溫度攝氏二十度左右,足以供村民生活和灌溉附近的農田所用。
曾有諺語說:「大湯山好地方,山清水秀好風光。蔬菜四季有,花果滿山崗;池塘黑泥藕兒白,山下熱水稻兒香。」自然資源並非無窮盡,一九六○年代水源枯竭。大湯山村隸屬小湯山鎮,距小湯山村很近,雖然也有些企業單位入住,但村的境況遠不如小湯山村。
Xiaotangshan Village developed into Xiaotangshan Town, which is almost known to everyone; but little-known is that there is also a little-known Datangshan Village, which was already formed as a village in the Ming Dynasty. There is a hill more than 130 meters high in the north of the village. Like Xiaotangshan Village, it is named after the hill. It turns out that Datangshan Village is rich in water resources. There are many springs at the foot of the mountain. The spring water flows continuously all year round. The temperature is about 20 degrees Celsius, which is enough for the villagers to live and irrigate nearby farmland.
A proverb once said: "Datang Mountain is a good place, with clear mountains and beautiful scenery. Vegetables are available all year round, and the hills are full of flowers and fruits; the ponds are black and the mud is white, and the rice is fragrant in the hot water at the foot of the mountain." Natural resources are not endless. In the 1960s, Water sources dry up. Datangshan Village is affiliated to Xiaotangshan Town and is very close to Xiaotangshan Village. Although some corporate units have moved in, the village's situation is far inferior to that of Xiaotangshan Village.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be nice to get a second opinion on these new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Liberia–United States relations. ✗ plicit 06:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Most of the history section of this article is about Liberia–United States relations and not the embassy. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 05:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E - Notable for only a single WP:RECENT event, and references are only related to that event. She could be a line in OpenAI about the circumstances. ZimZalaBim talk 04:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Inadequate deletion rationale, I hope editors here can add sources they found to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
It's just a high school. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 04:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Sources are either passing mention, or stunt pulling caused by the company paying lots of money, from sources of questionable reliability. Fermiboson ( talk) 03:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:NBASIC. The only sources found are databases and passing mentions. Tails Wx 03:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't see a consensus here and with no comments coming after the second relisting, I doubt a third one would be productive. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG since there is almost no coverage of this failed legislation in any media outlet.
Perhaps this article could be rescued into a longer article about the various national efforts to establish the heritage month, but that would require significant improvements. — BillHPike ( talk, contribs) 11:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While this looks like a keep/N/C the delete !votes have policy with them Star Mississippi 03:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject is an amateur footballer with close to no professional career experience. He fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - nothing more than the usual stuff of transfer reports, mostly automatically generated and unreliable stats pages and the occasional Facebook post - none of them qualifying as a reliable source. [62] Angelo ( talk) 22:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep Appears to meet content requirements.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analyzing the arguments above against our P&Gs, I'm not terribly moved by the keep !votes. Relisting to establish further consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Reopening this deletion request as its been over 2 years since the first deletion request resulted in no consensus waiting for additional sources to prove sufficient notability and no such sources have been found. Dazzling4 ( talk) 16:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider Johnlp's addition and the suggested potential redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep as it appears the issues re: GEOLAND qualification have been resolved. If it and Heiner/Hiner need merging or other renaming, it can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 03:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "Trace Fork" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Fails WP:NPLACE. Nagol0929 ( talk) 15:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
-- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 20:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Obvious GNG failure. All sources are self sources, not a single hit otherwise on Google. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I have copyedited this article to improve readability, accuracy and compliance with Wikipedia quality standards. I also added some relevant details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillaumeroy ( talk • contribs) 14:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Proving Liberland occupation is already useful now, eg concerning the informations published on Wikipedia.A clear and unambiguous admission that Liberland's publicity machine is actively seeking to manipulate article content. Not news of course, given the WP:CoI violations, socking, partisan spin, and outright misrepresentation of sources we have seen in the past, but nice to see it confirmed in writing from the participants.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The page seemed to fail SIGCOV. Only 3 references: first was the archive of mall owner's page, the other two about the buses that pass the center did not even show as such. No reliable secondary referencing on the page. Tagged for notability concerns for almost 1 year. Slothades ( talk) 02:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Despite the extra 7 days, no further arguments regarding a potential rename have been advanced. Daniel ( talk) 10:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This article fails on notability per WP:BIO. At this point, I have done extensive searching of the minister's name beyond what is expected in WP:BEFORE, and have not found a single source supporting their notability (or even their existence, for that matter). In addition, the one source on the article only contains a passing mention of the minister among a list of other names. This directly goes against the notion of presumed notability as the subject is not significantly covered in multiple published sources, yet it has been claimed that the article should still be kept per WP:POLITICIAN. However, that policy specifically states that the person being a minister is a "secondary criterion" to notability, and I have found no evidence thus far supporting that the subject of this article is notable to begin with. Leafy46 ( talk) 01:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it looks like this is a probably Keep but I thought I'd relist so that editors could consider a possible rename. Those discussions typically happen after an AFD closure but I think if this discussion is closed, editors will quickly move on to other discussions and this article will likely be forgotten. So, allow me delay this closure to solicit more opinions on this possible article page move.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Not sure how this has survived almost 3 months in mainspace. There is literally nothing online. It's just a random person. ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 00:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This genus is only described in thesis, [66] and this is not considered as valid taxa. (See [67]) Ta-tea-two-te-to ( talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Arkansas state agencies#Department of Commerce. ✗ plicit 00:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This page only has 1 reference. I argue that this page is not notable enough. Therefore, I think it should be merged into the "Government and Military" section of "Aviation in Arkansas". A.FLOCK ( talk) 18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was redirect to Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's individual. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
He competed at the 2004 Summer Olympics but did not win a medal. A WP:BEFORE search didn't bring up sufficient sources to pass WP:GNG. An alternative to deletion could be Archery at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's individual as he didn't compete in more than one event. Suonii180 ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Coverage is routine about funding. WP:CORP does not seem to be met. SmartSE ( talk) 23:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
23:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Neither recognized as the most trusted astrologer (it's the real Indian award), nor as a businessperson BoraVoro ( talk) 13:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
RL0919 (
talk)
13:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This person simply does not exist. A total WP:HOAX. Thanks to @ Oceanh for bringing it to light.
Worst of all, the creator has edited lots of other articles, vandalizing some, at least including the subject's alleged brother. Most of the ensuing discussion should adress the actions of this user. Geschichte ( talk) 19:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:36, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and organization-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general and music maker-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Children's Theatre Company. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a stub. Content should be merged into Children's Theatre Company and Theatre for Young Audiences The Savage Norwegian 21:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to North Carolina Court of Appeals#Former judges as a viable ATD since no further input is forthcoming Star Mississippi 03:25, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
the subject fails GNG, notability under NPOL is questionable but I could not find any RS with SIGCOV of the subject. The page was mainly a copy-paste job from official press releases and still reads like a promo piece. The only sources are a campaign website, a press release and ballotopedia. hroest 19:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Star Wars: Jedi Knight. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and Notability, probably the sources mostly based on rankings/listicles only I think. GreenishPickle! ( 🔔) 21:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Moldova women's international footballers. The subject has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All that came up in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Latvian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like this. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Macedonian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 22:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, has not received enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. All I found in my searches were passing mentions like 1, 2, and 3. JTtheOG ( talk) 20:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus which does not preclude a redirect if sourcing is found to be insufficient Star Mississippi 03:27, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 23:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A second opinion on these newly located sources would be helpful as well as an assessment if they provide adequate SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: third relist in hopes of more discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891
Talk
Work
20:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Pikmin#Protagonists. Complex/ Rational 22:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and Notability, relying on RefBombing to try and give the semblance of some bulk to the article. There's little discussion about him as an actual character, and even the sources acknowledge he's essentially a blank canvas. It has the hallmarks of the same problems facing many other Smash Bros. character articles that were previously redirected, just with less overall salvageable information. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Atlus games , which has a consensus slight edge. Target can be adjusted as a matter of editorial judgement and doesn't require a relist Star Mississippi 03:28, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
There does not appear to have any sources about it, even after over a decade being tagged as having no citations. For a Japanese exclusive game it also having no Japanese article seems very indicative there is no notability to the game. GamerPro64 18:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to F-Zero#Plot which can be re-visited, target wise, as a matter of editorial judgement should a character list come into existence Star Mississippi 03:30, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Fails SIGCOV and notability, relying on mostly small quick statements to try and give it any semblance of a body via WP:REFBOMB. We have a situation here where the sources *themselves* point out there's nothing to say about the character outside of the old meme regarding his voice lines, and even then trying to turn up discussion regarding them has been fruitless.
In the end, it's the same problem as many other Smash Bros. focused character articles. Kung Fu Man ( talk) 18:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. No clear indications that sourcing or notability requirements are met; the additional sources presented in the keep !votes are similar to those already present. Complex/ Rational 22:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Aside from UPE concerns, the articles seems to be filled with articles that are paid for. Olayinka holds the post of a special adviser to the Governor of Lagos State; which does not pass the bar for WP:NPOL. As an aspirant, sadly, Olayinka could not make it to the House of Representatives; again, fails NPOL. Neither does Olayinka meet the general notability guidelines independently. Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 17:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete as sourcing is found to be insufficient. However, if someone wants this as a draft to rename and scope, just ping me. Star Mississippi 03:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable organization. I'm not seeing coverage that isn't PR-Newswire posts or first party. The Squirrel Conspiracy ( talk) 09:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
22:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late proposal to rename and re-scope the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep as it appears sourcing questions have been addressed Star Mississippi 03:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy G4 declined as one of the refs is newer than those in the original article - that's one of precisely two refs and is an obit in the South Whidbey Record - so an obituary in a newspaper that "serves the south end of Whidbey Island, beginning with the Island gateway of Clinton, where Washington State ferries dock after crossing Puget Sound from the mainland and Seattle" is the only additional claim of notability to that which was deemed insufficient in 2017. Still fails WP:GNG; WP:NACTOR with minor roles throughout. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 15:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
22:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments | Source |
---|---|
Mentions in footnotes, nothing close to WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. | 1. Stephen J. Bottoms: The Theatre of Sam Shepard: States of Crisis. Cambridge University Press, 1998, ISBN 978-0-521-58791-4 (google.de [abgerufen am 6. Juni 2020]). |
IMDB entry | 2. ↑ Jim Haynie (IMDb). Abgerufen am 6. Juni 2020. |
Obit with the normal problems associated with obits. | 3. ↑ Jim Haynie: Feb. 6, 1940 - April 3, 2021. 2. Juli 2021, abgerufen am 27. Juli 2021 (amerikanisches Englisch). |
4. ↑ Post von seiner Ehefrau Maggie Causey auf Facebook. Abgerufen am 15. Juni 2021 (englisch). | |
Title indicates this is an obit, but not able to find anything on subject from the article or above link is blank. Editor above states "also listed him" and a mention in a list also fails WP:SIGCOV. | 5. ↑ Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences: In Memoriam. Abgerufen am 15. Juni 2021 (englisch). |
The main reason why he did not get so many obituarys at the time of his death is that obviously this information wasn't given to the press for a long time.shows the problem with obits regarding WP:NPOV, WP:IS. // Timothy :: talk 08:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Why the page should be deleted: 1. No citations, exclusively primary sources, aside from a single metal.de review ( https://www.metal.de/reviews/underdark-in-the-name-of-chaos-14520/) I couldn't find anything abt this band. 2. There is a more notable band called Underdark from the UK which would better suit this page, albeit I can't just replace the content on the page y'know. So unless this gets the deletion go-ahead I can't write about the band. That is all. Chchcheckit ( talk) 16:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This overly bloated article on an obscure set of design principles followed by the Maharishi cult is bizarre to say the least, but it is more problematically being propped up by sources which are published in low-quality journals without outside notice we would normally require for tests of fringe notability. The one-off comments in mainstream sources that are quotemined in the article seem to be present for one purpose only: to make it seem like this is an encyclopedic topic when really it's just thinly veiled propaganda. We need to start weeding this WP:Walled garden, and I think starting with this article makes sense. jps ( talk) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was kept per comments. Recipients of Padma Shri are notable. The article has been vandalized. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NARTIST an autobiography whose only claim to notability is a failed verification to an award. Theroadislong ( talk) 16:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Very unclear topic or notability. Draftifying to give the creator a chance to correct this had no result. Basically, we have an infobox and background section about a different event, we have one source which when one actually checks it out doesn't even mention the event, and another source not about this attack at all. So this is an unsourced and due to the lack of concrete info for me unverifiable article. If it can be verified, shown to be notable, and cleaned, fine (that's why I draftified it), but if not it needs to be deleted. Fram ( talk) 16:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
I searched and it does not seem to be notable (by the way there is a card game which I assume is not related as this article mentions tiles) Chidgk1 ( talk) 13:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails to general and company-specific notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Richard Menta. as a viable ATD as at the moment Menta is not up foe deletion. Star Mississippi 03:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
It would appear to me that this website - it is online when I checked as part of WP:BEFORE is still active - fails any number of notability tests, including but not limited to WP:WEBPAGE, and WP:NCORP for relation to its parent companies or subsidiaries, such as they may be.
I note that
As always, please do prove me wrong about this!
Shirt58 ( talk) 🦘 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
13:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Zero third party coverage. Sohom ( talk) 14:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 11:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
yvanyblog (talk) 09:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
stub on an unnotable sportsperson. fails general notability guideline. sourced to databases (note: second source is completely dead). preliminary search for sources turns up nothing but unreliable sources and whatever this is. ltb d l ( talk) 12:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "謝天佑與曾文輝同是20歲,同是從小便希望可以成為職業足球員,還憧憬如外國球星般賺取豐厚報酬;可是入行後便發覺,現實與理想有很大距離,但兩人仍咬緊牙關,希望可在球圈踢出成績。... 5歲接觸足球,中一已夢想做職業球員的謝天佑,在流浪經過兩年青年軍時代後,獲提升到甲組,開始全職踢波,月薪4,000元;就算後來加到5,000元,間中有點獎金,只是從屯門乘車到市區練波已月花過千。 ... 從流浪轉會到港菁的謝天佑(左),今季操練較以往積極。"
From Google Translate: "Tse Tin Yau and Tsang Man Fai are both 20 years old. They both dreamed of becoming professional footballers since they were young, and they also dreamed of earning huge rewards like foreign stars. However, after entering the industry, they discovered that reality and ideals are very different. Although the distance was huge, the two still gritted their teeth and hoped to achieve results in the football circle. ... Tse Tin Yau, who started playing football at the age of 5 and had already dreamed of becoming a professional player in the first grade of secondary school, won the title of Wan after two years of wandering in the youth army. He was promoted to Group A and started playing wave full-time, with a monthly salary of NT$4,000. Even if it was later increased to NT$5,000, with occasional bonuses, just taking the bus from Tuen Mun to the city to practice wave already cost more than 1,000 yuan a month. ... Transferred from Wandering Tse Tin Yau (left), who arrived in Hong Kong, is training more actively this season than before.
The article notes: "昨晚在九龍灣公園上演的 1 場甲組聯賽又演 「全武行」,比賽末段流浪右閘謝天佑襲擊 大中球員盧俊傑後又與燕鳴昊 「肉搏」,結 果雙雙被逐。... 由於謝天佑言語上辱及盧俊傑的母親,盧母賽後大聲指罵流浪總監李輝立之餘又在 "
From Google Translate: "Last night, a League A match played at Kowloon Bay Park was another "all-out show". At the end of the game, the wandering right-backer Tse Tin Yau attacked the big player Lu Junjie and then had a "hand-to-hand" fight with Yan Minghao. [more discussion about Tse's involvement in the fight] ... Because Tse Tin Yau verbally insulted Lu Junjie's mother, Lu's mother loudly criticized the wandering director Li Huili after the game."
The article notes: "谢天佑 TSE Tin Yau 中场 31-07-1991"
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
American biomedical company fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH and basically WP:NOTCRUNCHBASE. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NotAGenious (
talk)
11:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete- Rather than having in-depth details about the organisation, the "coverage" usually consists of mentioning the research that was done. I fail to see the consistent, noteworthy coverage to meet subject-specific notability guideline for businesses and organisations demands. Fails NCORP. 2409:40F3:A:3510:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 03:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NACTOR. Google reveals various hits on another person of the same name who is a crypto CEO of some sort, and various other actors with the same first name, before this person even shows up (and it's a passing mention in a gossip rag). Sources in the article are gossip or primary. Previously deleted as A7 and G5, though I of course can't see why that is. Fermiboson ( talk) 11:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eritrean Premier League. Star Mississippi 03:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
No sources since 2011. It doesn't seem like it can be improved. When sources are available it can be recreated. Dl.thinker ( talk) 11:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Greenman ( talk) 17:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Minimally sourced. Reads like product advertisement. Kleuske ( talk) 10:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Hardly sourced. Reads like product advertisement. Kleuske ( talk) 10:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 10:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Canadian not notable diplomat with no indication of reliable sources. Delete Tls9-me ( talk) 10:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Chinese not notable chess player with no indication of reliable sources. Delete Tls9-me ( talk) 10:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
SourcesPeople are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
- If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability.
The article notes: "黄仁杰一直被称作中国国象界的新锐,是山东队重点培养的年轻棋手。作为2004年后出生的小将,黄仁杰的成绩也足够优秀,曾获得2018年世界青少年锦标赛超快棋赛14岁组第一名,2019年第四届全国智力运动会获国际象棋少年组个人及团体双料冠军,以及2021年获男子国象世界冠军分区赛中国区冠军。本次常规赛前八轮比赛中,黄仁杰取得5胜2平1负的不俗战绩,也是山东队的主要得分手。"
From Google Translate: "Huang Renjie has always been called a rising star in China's national chess world and is a young chess player that the Shandong team focuses on training. As a young player born after 2004, Huang Renjie's performance is also good enough. He won the first place in the 14-year-old group of the 2018 World Youth Championship Blitz, and won both the individual and team awards in the chess youth group at the 4th National Mind Games in 2019. Champion, and the China Champion of the Men's National Physics World Championship Division in 2021. In the first eight rounds of this regular season, Huang Renjie achieved a good record of 5 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, and is also the main scorer of the Shandong team."
The article notes: "尚不满16岁的黄仁杰是一位下棋认真、吃饭“不够认真”的少年。1月16日,第二届“滨海新区杯”国际象棋中国公开赛在天津结束了第六轮的争夺,赛后和小伙伴一起吃小火锅时,两人并不是面对面坐着边聊边吃,在火锅开锅前黄仁杰也没有像大多数同龄人那样拿出手机玩游戏,而是打开手机里的国际象棋棋局认真研究起来,... 在去年的第四届全国智力运动会上,黄仁杰代表山东队获得了少年男子个人和少年男子团体两枚金牌。"
From Google Translate: "Huang Renjie, who is not yet 16 years old, is a young man who plays chess seriously but is not serious enough about eating. On January 16, the second "Binhai New Area Cup" China Chess Open ended in the sixth round in Tianjin. After the game, when eating hotpot with friends, the two did not sit face to face and chat while eating. Before the hot pot started, Huang Renjie did not take out his mobile phone to play games like most of his peers. Instead, he opened the chess game on his mobile phone and studied it carefully... At the Fourth National Mind Games last year, Huang Renjie represented Shandong The team won two gold medals for the Junior Men's Individual and Junior Men's Team."
The article notes: "小将黄仁杰近来势头大好,2019年便帮助青岛城阳队以冠军之姿冲进甲级联赛。2021年初,黄仁杰代表兄弟队济南银丰队出战,夺取了第一届中国城市国际象棋联赛总冠军。今年五月底,黄仁杰在“华颐杯”2021年国际象棋男子世界冠军 分区赛(中国区)中,击败各路强手,登上冠军宝座,成功闯进世界杯。有诸多成绩在前,本次黄仁杰夺取新人王赛冠军,是意外之喜,也在情理之中。"
From Google Translate: "The young player Huang Renjie has been gaining momentum recently. In 2019, he helped the Qingdao Chengyang team enter the First Division as a champion. At the beginning of 2021, Huang Renjie played on behalf of his brothers team Jinan Yinfeng and won the first China City Chess League championship. At the end of May this year, Huang Renjie defeated various strong players in the "Huayi Cup" 2021 Men's World Chess Championship Division (China Region), ascended to the championship, and successfully entered the World Cup. With many achievements ahead of him, Huang Renjie's victory in the Rookie of the Year Championship is an unexpected surprise and is reasonable."
The article notes: "中国国际象棋协会消息,“瑞贝卡杯”2023年第三届中国国际象棋新锐赛23日在南京结束全部九轮争夺,最终黄仁杰夺得冠军,赵晨曦位列第二,奚奇获得季军。"
From Google Translate: "According to the China Chess Association, the "Rebecca Cup" 2023 Third China Chess Emerging Competition concluded all nine rounds of competition in Nanjing on the 23rd. In the end, Huang Renjie won the championship, Zhao Chenxi ranked second, and Xi Qi won the third place."
The article notes: "英伦和“00后”小将黄仁杰都需要从首轮打起。不过黄仁杰的对手美国棋手刘宇镇缺席首轮比赛,黄仁杰不战而胜,顺利进入第二轮。"
From Google Translate: "Both England and the "post-00s" young player Huang Renjie need to start from the first round. However, Huang Renjie's opponent, American chess player Liu Yuzhen, was absent from the first round. Huang Renjie won without a fight and successfully entered the second round."
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 07:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Article about a person that does not meet WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Not much about the subject to confer notability. Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable poet or writer, no mentions in Books other than being father of Abdul Qavi Desnavi. Just a father of notable person does not make him notable. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk) 09:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Promo piece on a non-notable private biz school. Published years ago, but IMO should never have got through AfC (accepted by a since-blocked sock). Cites only primary sources, and BEFORE finds nothing beyond the usual rankings, directory listings, sponsored content and social media. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT by some margin. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 08:11, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The sources are mostly not about the portal. Extremely poor and superficial coverage, delete. Tls9-me ( talk) 08:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
*Delete article based on passing mentions and lacking in depth coverage in reliable independent sources.
Mccapra (
talk)
20:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Clear promotion, I've already removed not referenced parts with links to PR.com and other not reliable press-releases; the remaining few sources are not reliable and routine. Delete per not WP:NCORP Tls9-me ( talk) 08:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This article needs additional citations for
verification. |
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Brochure advertising article in the GRAITEC series. See coi report. No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 08:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. The IP editor (or IP editors, but it looks like one) has put some work into defending the article, but providing more references which mention her and her books but do not give substantial coverage to her does not outweigh the policy-based arguments given by other editors for deletion. JBW ( talk) 20:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Every single reference in this article is a link to one of the many itemised published articles in the Literature and Bibliography section. A writer writes articles, so we really don't have notability. Everything else in here is WP:NOTCV. We have the publication of a book on Bali, but the grounds for notability for the work or its author are scant - vide being shortlisted for a redlinked prize. In total, we fail WP:GNG - despite the polish that has been invested here. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
08:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear sir/madam,
With all respect, the argument she has only written one book I believe doesn’t hold. She worked on it for seven years and was chosen as one of the best 5 history books of 2022 of the Netherlands. There is a fiction prize (Libris) and a non-fiction prize (Libris History Prize). In addition she writes for national newspapers. The fact there are translations of articles is not to blow things up but because a well known publisher in Belgium (de lage landen) has published those articles in multiple languages due to their significance. It makes them also accessible to people from multiple countries. In case you have more questions please let me know.
Kind regards and thank you for your non-paid effort to optimize Wikipedia!
Kind regards, Ewout — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.245.233.60 ( talk) 13:56, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
the argument she has only written one bookdoes hold. It would not hold if she had published a number of books different from one. The long work on the book was mostly the author's PhD studies and her dissertation research/writing. A well-received book is a career accomplishment. Let's appreciate that and not make it more than it is! gidonb ( talk) 01:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Article has been tagged for BLP sources since 2020, the only citation used is a self-published website. I wasn’t able to find any RS sources to fulfill WP:GNG PigeonChickenFish ( talk) 07:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Daniel ( talk) 22:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates per se — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one. The office held is a local office and while some local officeholders can meet notability for a variety of reasons, including time in office (e.g. Robert L. Butler or Hilmar Moore) or being a local officeholder who qualifies under some other criteria (e.g. Rita Crundwell, Betty Loren-Maltese for crime). Notability is not inherited from Pramila Jayapal or Maya Jayapal. Possible redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Oregon.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
03:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist as this is looking like a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
07:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Editors interested in a possible Merge can start a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This attack has no need to be a standalone page outside of 2023 Hamas attack on Israel, where the three paragraphs on the attack can be easily accommodated, and where the material would sit in it broader context ( WP:PAGEDECIDE). Some of the detail here is poorly supported by the in-line citation and needs reworking. The only statement providing a firm casualty count at the time of this nomination, for example, actually failed verification, with the citation containing only a trivial mention of the attack. The number of injured is then a question mark: "many", and there is no count of the attackers either. Overall, between the thin detail / other content issues, and the lack of an obvious need for a standalone page, the page should be merged. Iskandar323 ( talk) 07:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
In theory, this should meet WP:GEOLAND. However, I couldn't find the sources to confirm this or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 06:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Last AfD was 15 years ago and WP has developed stronger ideas of notability since then. There is no significant coverage of these relations which previous keep votes failed to address. Any relations can be covered in British Western Pacific Territories and History of Nauru. LibStar ( talk) 05:20, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 06:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This article cites no sources and has no evidence of notability other than having a museum (which has its own article). The location itself is not notable. DirtyHarry991 ( talk) 02:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Datangshan is a hill and village in Xiaotangshan, Beijing, where it is mentioned. Xiaotangshan, Beijing is a possible redirect target if Datangshan found to be non-notable. Here are two sources I found:
The article notes: "北京城北约40里,有一座由三个山峰组成的独立小山,山形如笔架,因有温泉泉眼,被古人命名为“大汤山”。大汤山以西约一千米处,有三个低矮山丘,也有温泉,被称为“小汤山”。在因抗疫而被载入史册之前,小汤山就是著名的疗愈之地,并受到多位皇帝青睐,也是民国时的旅游胜地。"
From Google Translate: "About 40 miles north of Beijing, there is an independent hill composed of three peaks. The mountain is shaped like a pen stand. It was named "Datang Mountain" by the ancients because of its hot springs. About one thousand meters west of Datang Mountain, there are three low hills and hot springs, which are called "Xiaotang Mountain". Before it was recorded in history for its anti-epidemic work, Xiaotangshan was a famous healing place and was favored by many emperors. It was also a tourist attraction during the Republic of China."
The article notes:
From Google Translate:小湯山村發展成小湯山鎮,幾乎人所共知;殊不知還有一個鮮為人知的大湯山村,明代已經形成村落。村北有一個一百三十餘米高的山丘,與小湯山村一樣因山丘得名。原來大湯山村水資源豐富,山腳下有多處泉眼,泉水常年流淌不斷,溫度攝氏二十度左右,足以供村民生活和灌溉附近的農田所用。
曾有諺語說:「大湯山好地方,山清水秀好風光。蔬菜四季有,花果滿山崗;池塘黑泥藕兒白,山下熱水稻兒香。」自然資源並非無窮盡,一九六○年代水源枯竭。大湯山村隸屬小湯山鎮,距小湯山村很近,雖然也有些企業單位入住,但村的境況遠不如小湯山村。
Xiaotangshan Village developed into Xiaotangshan Town, which is almost known to everyone; but little-known is that there is also a little-known Datangshan Village, which was already formed as a village in the Ming Dynasty. There is a hill more than 130 meters high in the north of the village. Like Xiaotangshan Village, it is named after the hill. It turns out that Datangshan Village is rich in water resources. There are many springs at the foot of the mountain. The spring water flows continuously all year round. The temperature is about 20 degrees Celsius, which is enough for the villagers to live and irrigate nearby farmland.
A proverb once said: "Datang Mountain is a good place, with clear mountains and beautiful scenery. Vegetables are available all year round, and the hills are full of flowers and fruits; the ponds are black and the mud is white, and the rice is fragrant in the hot water at the foot of the mountain." Natural resources are not endless. In the 1960s, Water sources dry up. Datangshan Village is affiliated to Xiaotangshan Town and is very close to Xiaotangshan Village. Although some corporate units have moved in, the village's situation is far inferior to that of Xiaotangshan Village.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
04:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It would be nice to get a second opinion on these new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Liberia–United States relations. ✗ plicit 06:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Most of the history section of this article is about Liberia–United States relations and not the embassy. Fails GNG. LibStar ( talk) 05:05, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP1E - Notable for only a single WP:RECENT event, and references are only related to that event. She could be a line in OpenAI about the circumstances. ZimZalaBim talk 04:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Inadequate deletion rationale, I hope editors here can add sources they found to the article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
It's just a high school. Counterfeit Purses ( talk) 04:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 06:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP. Sources are either passing mention, or stunt pulling caused by the company paying lots of money, from sources of questionable reliability. Fermiboson ( talk) 03:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSBASIC and WP:NBASIC. The only sources found are databases and passing mentions. Tails Wx 03:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I don't see a consensus here and with no comments coming after the second relisting, I doubt a third one would be productive. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG since there is almost no coverage of this failed legislation in any media outlet.
Perhaps this article could be rescued into a longer article about the various national efforts to establish the heritage month, but that would require significant improvements. — BillHPike ( talk, contribs) 11:22, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
02:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. While this looks like a keep/N/C the delete !votes have policy with them Star Mississippi 03:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Subject is an amateur footballer with close to no professional career experience. He fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV - nothing more than the usual stuff of transfer reports, mostly automatically generated and unreliable stats pages and the occasional Facebook post - none of them qualifying as a reliable source. [62] Angelo ( talk) 22:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:26, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Keep Appears to meet content requirements.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:12, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Analyzing the arguments above against our P&Gs, I'm not terribly moved by the keep !votes. Relisting to establish further consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Reopening this deletion request as its been over 2 years since the first deletion request resulted in no consensus waiting for additional sources to prove sufficient notability and no such sources have been found. Dazzling4 ( talk) 16:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider Johnlp's addition and the suggested potential redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep as it appears the issues re: GEOLAND qualification have been resolved. If it and Heiner/Hiner need merging or other renaming, it can be handled editorially. Star Mississippi 03:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Advanced search for: "Trace Fork" | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Fails WP:NPLACE. Nagol0929 ( talk) 15:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
-- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count) 20:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
{{
cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
02:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Obvious GNG failure. All sources are self sources, not a single hit otherwise on Google. Fermiboson ( talk) 02:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
I have copyedited this article to improve readability, accuracy and compliance with Wikipedia quality standards. I also added some relevant details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillaumeroy ( talk • contribs) 14:04, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Proving Liberland occupation is already useful now, eg concerning the informations published on Wikipedia.A clear and unambiguous admission that Liberland's publicity machine is actively seeking to manipulate article content. Not news of course, given the WP:CoI violations, socking, partisan spin, and outright misrepresentation of sources we have seen in the past, but nice to see it confirmed in writing from the participants.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
The page seemed to fail SIGCOV. Only 3 references: first was the archive of mall owner's page, the other two about the buses that pass the center did not even show as such. No reliable secondary referencing on the page. Tagged for notability concerns for almost 1 year. Slothades ( talk) 02:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Despite the extra 7 days, no further arguments regarding a potential rename have been advanced. Daniel ( talk) 10:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This article fails on notability per WP:BIO. At this point, I have done extensive searching of the minister's name beyond what is expected in WP:BEFORE, and have not found a single source supporting their notability (or even their existence, for that matter). In addition, the one source on the article only contains a passing mention of the minister among a list of other names. This directly goes against the notion of presumed notability as the subject is not significantly covered in multiple published sources, yet it has been claimed that the article should still be kept per WP:POLITICIAN. However, that policy specifically states that the person being a minister is a "secondary criterion" to notability, and I have found no evidence thus far supporting that the subject of this article is notable to begin with. Leafy46 ( talk) 01:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it looks like this is a probably Keep but I thought I'd relist so that editors could consider a possible rename. Those discussions typically happen after an AFD closure but I think if this discussion is closed, editors will quickly move on to other discussions and this article will likely be forgotten. So, allow me delay this closure to solicit more opinions on this possible article page move.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Not sure how this has survived almost 3 months in mainspace. There is literally nothing online. It's just a random person. ~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 00:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This genus is only described in thesis, [66] and this is not considered as valid taxa. (See [67]) Ta-tea-two-te-to ( talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Arkansas state agencies#Department of Commerce. ✗ plicit 00:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
This page only has 1 reference. I argue that this page is not notable enough. Therefore, I think it should be merged into the "Government and Military" section of "Aviation in Arkansas". A.FLOCK ( talk) 18:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:15, 23 November 2023 (UTC)