Welcome to my talk page. |
New messages at the bottom of the page, please. Messages placed elsewhere will be ignored and/or removed. |
Just a small edit to say thanks a ton for passing along the vandalism report today! Has now been resolved, with the vandal pages deleted. :) Cheers! — JezzaHehn ( talk) 03:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
I made an edit, and left a clear justification in the edit summary. You undid that edit without bothering to explain why, and then left me a talk page message falsely accusing me of not giving a valid reason for my edit. Kindly explain why you did this. Zqzkqzq ( talk) 11:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I was editing on MQ 9 Reaper page on which you have reverted. I was just rearranging according to alphabet. Please see to it. I ame Shears ( talk) 13:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 21:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Kleuske and MurielMary: perhaps a possible way to go forward here might be draftifying this article for while as an alternative to outright speedy deletion? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I will. For Areddu I thought it was clear: it was a blogpost. For more context, this person has been banned from italian wikipedia because he is a serial spammer. For Gigi Sanna, well he is a journalist that prints his fringe theories in a printshop. Anyway I'll be more explicit now, -- PedroPistolas ( talk) 18:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, i realised that after i made it, Wikipedia is pretty confusing at first. Reading the Tutorial page as we're speaking, Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by En svensk med kritik ( talk • contribs) 14:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I request you to hide my edit history to new users and add a semi protection to my userpage because this guy is psycho and a small kidd he is trying every sigle possibility to mess up with me. Thank you Vikassharmasafidon ( talk) 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, where from I can get the list of mods. Vikassharmasafidon ( talk) 09:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am trying to improve the University of Sheffield page. The section about Controversies includes a very subjective section relating to the Archaeology Department. I tried to rewrite this to be more objective but the original author seems to overwrite it with the previous biased entry. The original author appears to have a serious conflict of interest which is apparent in the tone of the piece. The piece includes libellous content in its wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.254.172 ( talk) 11:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
You reverted my revision as of 13:08, 14 October 2021 at Köchel catalogue and asked for a source. Well, I actually wrote the revision according to this page Church Sonatas (Mozart). Apparently it is wrong. Rômulo de Assunção Rondon Mello ( talk) 00:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up on my page for the company I have a COI with [ Life Technology Ltd]. I hopefully have declared it properly. I've not used Wikipedia in a few years and I cant remember my old email (lost account) or username so I started from scratch, but hopefully I will be able to help out the community again. Please let me know if there are any issues and i will do my best to correct them. Ultimatum020 ( talk) 12:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Paid editors must provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. If such an account is deleted or removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week.
It was on De Klerk himself, and it's not as if he's here to be offended, now is he? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.73.228.124 ( talk) 10:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, you've noted that i sourced poorly on the wikipage "Shitcoin". I agree and would like to rectify the mistakes I made, but I'm unable to do so as a semi-protection has been placed, and I can no longer edit pages. I will likely be the editor for this page for a good while, so please "unblock" me. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Weissmann ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome wagon :) Do you have an interest in animation as well? 18bwhite4 ( talk) 20:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, just a quick note to say I've undone the removal of a block notice from the talk page of ENCYCLOBOYS - not your edit, but there has been some back-and-forth that you were involved in and you were one of those who removed it. Please remember that users are more than welcome to remove messages sent to them (with few exceptions which do not cover this - it's not a declined unblock request, it's not a deletion tag, it's not a shared IP notice). This also means that (in my opinion) it's probably not the greatest idea to have used rollback to undo the removal either, as it doesn't give the opportunity for you to explain why. stwalkerster ( talk) 19:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you left a message on my talk page that I've removed Twitter link of her but in the guidelines there are social media links are don't allow that's why I've removed ... Can you explain me more about it ??? Truedboner ( talk) 10:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Kleuske so self post Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, also allowed as citation ???
At
Lynching you reverted me with the edit summary Don't lie in edit summaries. Thanks
. I think that was a clear violation of
WP:NPA as well as
WP:AGF. You self-reverted, giving Ooops
as your edit summary. That's neither an apology nor an explanation. So I asked for an explanation on that article's talk page in a discussion you had already started regarding a different issue. I'm sure that I didn't violate any rules, because a good discussion is virtually impossible while one part accuses the other of lying. That's why had to be clarified before the discussion could go on. Please remember that I wrote that before you apologized. The discussion then went on on my talk page, I made a comment that was clearly trying to end the discussion in a peaceful manner, and then you said, The "I'm not happy with your reaction" feeling is very much mutual.
I asked for an explanation, you haven't answered so far. I did nothing wrong, but you did. What is it you keep complaining about, wasting your time and mine ?
Rsk6400 (
talk) 19:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
The point of noting that dwarves, elves, goblins and trolls are also on the same list as hobbits is in response to Shippey's claim that it's a list of bodiless ghosts, which is untrue. There are many creatures on that list that are commonly held to be corporeal. Plus your claim that "The creatures mentioned are all fairly well known in various mythologies" is untrue, many of them are well-known but many are almost extremely obscure. Moreover, you claimed that the last bit, which could be taken as editorializing I admit, is what you wanted the source for. I omitted it from the second edit (which you noted), but you still reversed it even though I added a direct link to the factual statements made. So since everything written was sourced, it seems you're reversing it for relevance, but it is clearly relevance because it contextualizes the quote from Shippey. Shippey's quote cherry-picks a very small bit of the text and draws a conclusion from it. As it stands now, you're happy to have Shippey's false claim stand. The list of creatures is NOT a list of disembodied ghosts. It is a mix of corporeal and incorporeal creatures of all kinds. Ifyffe ( talk) 20:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Shippey's quote cherry-picks a very small bit of the text and draws a conclusion from it.Please read WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. We try to summarize what reliable sources say on a topic. Wikipedians do not insert their own conclusions.
The paragraph is talking about binary, so I switched the qualifier "decimal" to "binary." However, it's not true that pi couldn't be written in digits of any base whatsoever. Also, I think it's inarguable that "amount" and putting it in a footnote are incorrect. Also, thank you for the welcome. Wuffuwwuf ( talk) 14:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome! I don't know how often I'll be able to be active, but I enjoy translation and hope I can find some pages on other Wikipedias that can contribute to the English Wikipedia. Copyedit & Translate ( talk) 14:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Re [1]: looks like he did do it again. I've reverted manually. Now what? Thanks. Marnanel ( talk) 13:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop restoring the edits on East Timor, they are from an abusive LTA farm. That is why they included really dumb tags. CMD ( talk) 11:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Hard to see how my opinion is any different from a number of 'proper' historians who have ignored parliamentary and other contemporary records in order to add Cromwell's name to their site. There was no military action using heavy artillery in the Eastern Borders in either 1648 or 1650, when Cromwell passed through the area. Fact. The story was generated in the nineteenth century and has been peddled ever since. Cromwell's Letters and Speeches have been course material ever since people have questioned the peddled history. Obviously, I do not have the essential academic credentials to understand Lead (or the affected 'lede') So we will just let the story stand before the thought police react. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cromwelled ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, Kleuske, this is my fault, I'm won't breaking any wikipedia rules at next time, this account is not a vandalism-only account Plutonium-244 RE 1797-84 ( talk) 09:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Fast and fair replier. RKPARAS ( talk) 10:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
looked nice and happy :( Sjobenrit ( talk) 08:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
It meets WP:A7, tag it for speedy deletion instead. Neither pass WP:POLITICIAN nor WP:GNG. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 15:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. An edit I made in the football section of the De La Salle (Concord, Calif.) High School page has been reversed for not having a source. It concerned a statement which itself is unsourced, claiming DLS played in every CIF Open Division state title game from the division’s inception in 2008 through 2019. That the Spartans run actually began in 2009 is something that can be verified on the CIF State page, among other places. ShakesTheClown46 ( talk) 07:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
{ /info/en/?search=User_talk:DwenDisciple#I_am_not_sure_if_you_are_trolling_or_just_lack_competence,_but_your_edit_to_Elder_Evils_was_unacceptable] See my comment. Doug Weller talk 11:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1110487246 Vedprakash Singh VPS ( talk) 07:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1110668287 Vedprakash Singh VPS ( talk) 13:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Yikes, I just noticed, and revised the edit and summary.... thanks for watching. It does get just a little hair-raising from time to time. Haploidavey ( talk) 10:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
I have edited several articles and would like to discuss your edits.
1. /info/en/?search=Auto_auction
I would like to supplement the sentence "There are also auctions that are open to the public in a few states like New Hampshire and Pennsylvania" with the fact that in addition to these states, open auctions for the public also operate in other states (about Canada, I agree - a new paragraph is needed ).
2. /info/en/?search=Salvage_title
Here I wanted to add information that there are relevant auctions, I think it would be interesting. After all, I didn’t even highlight any links, the information was presented, in my opinion, quite unbiased.
3. /info/en/?search=Used_car
In external links there is a site "Vincheck". At the bottom of their page there are links to other sources, I wanted to supplement the Wikipedia article with these sources.
4. /info/en/?search=Robot_welding
Very sorry for the removal of the link. ABAGY really has a lot of good materials, on the basis of which the article about robot welding was written.
Could you tell me how to fix this carefully so that my edits are not deleted?
I hope my English doesn't bother you - it's not my native language.
Ekaterina Mosolova (
talk) 11:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you stop adding back incorrect information that has been leading to the image abuse and trolling of this artist Deborah Gray. You are not an expert on this person nor have the right to add to the abuse of her reputation and information on line Edenleaf ( talk) 15:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey there! Regarding your recent revert on Edilli, did you look into the content that was removed? Azerbaijani government sources (which are not reliable) had been used as a basis to create a "Mass graves"-section for the geographic article that was twice as large as the size of the other content. I replaced the recently added material with a shorter, more neutral mention from a third-party source. AntonSamuel ( talk) 09:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
As an example of war crimes, or crimes against humanity, most of them had their legs tied with wire and rope.Strangely your edit does not mention that, even though it is, by your standards, properly sourced. I am not opposed to a rewording, even if it’s shorter, but failure to mention things like that, even though they are mentioned in your preferred source, is not acceptable. Kleuske ( talk) 10:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Correction. You find it highly problematic, because you declared all news outlets of an entire country non-reliable. Reducing this (reported by multiple sources) to “some guy reported” is WP:WHITEWASHING. If you did the same in other articles, that’s “highly problematic”. Kleuske ( talk) 15:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, if you could provide a more detailed explanation of why you are removing the "List of Exmor sensors" section that'd be great. There's no other list like this on the internet and it's a great resource when you need to look up specs of a sensor and what phones they are used in. To me it doesn't seem like there's a good reason for this to be removed. Clearly others think so also as they keep reverting it. Gamesrule 0 ( talk) 01:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you tagged an article for A7 [10] just one minute after creation. Doing so is strongly discouraged, especially for certain criteria such as A7, as the creator might still be actively working on the page and such a hasty tagging could be perceived as a WP:BITE. In general, unless a page is patent nonsense (G1), vandalism (G3), attack (G10), or copyvio (G12), it's often appropriate to wait at least 10–15 minutes, and sometimes at least an hour, before adding a speedy deletion tag. They might very well improve the page such that it no longer qualifies for A7 during this time, and won't be discouraged from doing so. Cheers, Complex/ Rational 15:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense for deletion shortly after creation may stop the creation of a good faith article and drive away a new contributor. Outside these exceptions, articles less than an hour old should not be nominated for deletion, blanked and redirected or moved to draftspace.We do have A7 for a reason – to bypass AfD/PROD for articles about subjects that have no credible claim of significance and probably can't be improved to a point that such a hypothetical AfD might close with a keep (e.g., one's own vanity page, or an "article" someone writes about their pet). Complex/ Rational 15:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello- You provided some information to me about proper posting and conflict of interest and reverted the postings I made back to the original. However, the "sports bra" page is missing information that has been there for a long time. I'm not sure who first added it, but the line is:
'"The first commercially available sports bra was the "Free Swing Tennis Bra" introduced by Glamorise Foundations, Inc. in 1975."'
Could this please be added back to the posting as it was before I made any changes? Thanks for your help! Sremo44 ( talk) 20:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to leave you a note about why I declined the U5 on User:DutchTB. U5 was recently revised in this edit as a result of this discussion. The key part of U5 at issue is that it requires that the editor have "few or no edits outside of user pages". DutchTB has 26 edits outside userspace here on EN, and quite a few on other projects such as nl and commons.
That said, that userpage is concerning, and more concerning is the comments he made about it which, if we take them at face value, indicate an inappropriate ownership attitude and an admission that the content is "not related to the purpose Wikipedia serves" (although I'm wondering if that's an error due to missing words or language barriers).
I did do a bit of a search to see if Tom de Beer is a real person who ran in the 2022 Municipal Council Elections in Laarbeek or not, and I couldn't find any confirmation, but given I was searching English language media I'm not surprised.
At any rate, I would suggest you consider taking the page to WP:MFD, as it may need discussion by the broader community. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 21:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I understand that I didn't write it in a equal or third person perspective but the sources i gave where pretty much reliable.. It was his own youtube page....okay i could understand the reddit part not being reliable, But the youtube page were Floppyboppy ( talk) 16:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Please have a look at the Chekavar page as well, there's a lot of paragraphs there saying that they were:
A "warrior surname", "exceptionally talented martial artists", "they were a warrior caste who fought for their rulers", "formed the army of the Chera Empire", "During the British rule, seeing their chivalric fighting skills which can be attributed to their Chekavar lineages," etc.
Seems like many unsourced sentences there, kindly remove these to improve the article.
Warm regards TheWanderer9 ( talk) 13:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I have an Wikipedia account. I already downloaded Wikipedia app. I have approx. 250 EDITS on wikipedia. I am "logged on" in wikipedia mobile app, I wanted to create a page but I was having some trouble editing in the app, so when I tried to log in to create some pages in the web browser, I got a warning in red letters above, so I read it. I went to log out of my account in the app, but in no time I got a message that I have been blocked. I am innocent, now you say that my only mistake was to help create a Wikipedia page. I already sent an appeal for unblock.
Help me Kleuske! Akashkumar39 ( talk) 14:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske! As per your suggestion on my talk page within the welcome message, I decided to turn to you for help. A month ago (more or less) I created a draft dedicated to Dario Scannapieco, the CEO of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti ( here), starting from the translation of the existing Italian article. I was wondering if you could give me an opinion, whether it would be okay or what needs to be improved. I would like to do everything I can to improve the draft and to be fully compliant with Wikipedia rules, since I have a conflict of interest with the topic. Thanks in advance! Silvifan ( talk) 15:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you reverted some of my edits on the Bending Spoons page because of WP:PROMO. While I could improve on this edit, yesterday's diff is merely an updated on outdated company information, and not promotional by any means. I'd work on the edits to fix them, and revert to this version in the meantime if you're fine with it. What do you think? FarewellTransmission ( talk) 11:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello there,
I have been attempting to update the page for Sense Scotland as I had noticed the information is out of date. Would you possibly be able to proofread this and publish if you agree with the changes? You can find the draft here.
Apologies, I am new to editing on Wikipedia so I may not be using the right process to request this.
GabeWiki2023 ( talk) 14:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dear, you have undone my edits about malegaon, as there is no reliable source as per your decision, no worries i just wanted to add missing info so i have added the data, i was born and brought up in malegaon and i am also owner of malegaon live news channel ( https://malegaonlive.com) so i think i have better knowledge of city. anyways its all up to you ! thanks Jayyogeshpagare ( talk) 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske
I would like to ask, if you don't mind, why you undid my revert in the above named article. A simple and quick analysis of the cited sourced shows two of them, Curta and Madgearu do not say what the editor claimed they said, and a third one, Transylvania and the Hungarian-Romanian problem it's not even written by the author the editor claimed. Aristeus01 ( talk) 18:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Exmor".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
— AP 499D25 (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of AMD Ryzen processors § Inclusion of prices in the tables. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello there! I'm pretty new to Wikipedia editing in general, and was browsing Bruno Peres' page, and noticed the link to his FIFA stats is down, so just updated that to a new link, and thought the small paragraph about his FIFA card was a nice addition so went ahead and added it to a few more players. All of them were reverted so I assume I did something wrong. Just wanted to reach out and check what it was so that I can work on it in the future. Thanks! Andyabihaidar ( talk) 15:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ruthika, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac ( talk) 15:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I am trying to update his biography. You are constantly undoing it without any particular reason. May I know what's wrong with it? StallinEditor ( talk) 12:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Under Mittal's leadership, RGU has grown to include a community of over 3.9 million gamers and has distributed over $251 million in winnings annually.That's WP:PROMO. Kleuske ( talk) 12:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, I'm MichaelBotts. I tried to edit the history of the Kirtland Temple on the list of temples, including a reference. Why was this deleted? The present reference to the Kirtland Temple implies that the temple belongs to the LDS church, although the temple is owned and operated by the Community of Christ. MichaelBotts ( talk) 08:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
It’s like playing whack a mole on that page. He is notable enough to warrant one, but he’s treating it like his personal resume. Talk page notices have been ignored. Afheather ( talk) 16:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Is AIV on you watchlist? How did you know i did that? 208.184.20.249 ( talk) 15:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlake High School (Texas), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kyle Adams and Scott Spann. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske,
We are Youngsters wanting to bring work of good NGOs in limelight. This NGO is doing remarkable work and this article is written after visiting their workshops and seeing their work as a neutral person. 
If you just point out the words or sentences which you feel is a misrepresentation or 'marketing', we can remove that text.
You have removed the entire work without any explanation. 
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards, 
Saurabh SDhivar ( talk) 10:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
“Don’t take your organs to the heaven for God know they are needed here”is promotion and it's far from the only example I could cite. I wish the NGO all kinds of success, but Wikipedia is not the place for that. Kleuske ( talk) 10:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Enlightenment fan ( talk) 02:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
...Pmnedus criticized your writing style. It took it upon myself to reply that in the face of obtuse persistance, "Just stop it" was a valid comment. David notMD ( talk) 11:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
What I'm adding is from the transcript of the source. 94.66.59.9 ( talk) 18:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Apologies. My favourite site, Fragrantica, which I used for refs, has a little section called "great deals at EBay" which I tend to overlook (since it's Ebay, not Fragrantica itself). After a little argue, I was told there is an issue with that and therefore, my edits looked as some kind of promotion. I accept that point. I am going to revert my edits only to carve away unnecessary links for modern fragnances - and leave Fragrantica entries for older, mostly discontinued fragnances like Fumee or 1937 feminine Old Spice. 81.89.66.133 ( talk) 11:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
You removed most of my edits to sections Significance and Relativity in the page Electromagnetic tensor ( /info/en/?search=Electromagnetic_tensor#Significance).
Those were nothing but generalizations of math already available in page Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime ( /info/en/?search=Maxwell's_equations_in_curved_spacetime#Electromagnetic_field).
Elementary math of covariant differentiation means that one of Maxwell's laws in tensor notation is always homogeneous ().
I think that it is very important to draw a conclusion here. Physically, that means that the classic (not quantized) EM field theory leaves no room for magnetic monopoles or currents of such to act as sources of the field. That is because the EM tensor is an exterior derivative of the EM four-potential.
I recall my high-shool teacher saying that the classic Maxwell equations written in terms of 3-vectors permit non-zero density of magnetic monopoles and non-zero current density of those, but we haven't found such experimentally (yet).
Four-tensor formulation and the nature of the EM four-tensor guarantees that there cannot be magnetic monopoles or currents of such.
Another important remark that I had added was that the expression relating the EM tensor to the EM four-potential is preserved in curved spacetime (the covariant derivatives are reduced to partial derivatives as in the Minkovskian case, yet the expression transforms as an absolute four-tensor). That means that the components of the curved spacetime (the connection coefficient terms from the covariant derivatives that cancel each other) do not affect the values of the EM tensor; those are defined solely by the underlying four-potential field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.yordanov ( talk • contribs) 14:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
References
You reported the user for their username just thought you should know the username is part of an LTA pattern: WP:LTA/HOY. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 12:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
You have reverted most of the edits I have made over the last month or so. The information that I had updated the Marina Centre page can be retrieved from the official government agency website responsible for zoning in Singapore.
As such, I would like to reup my edits on the Wikipedia page. Please let me know what the issue was for the edits to be reverted. Placemaker joshua ( talk) 07:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
I had edited the introduction section keeping the wikipedia guidelines on puffery and neutrality in mind but I see that any changes I do you only undo the efforts without any explanation. What is the point on having a wikipedia page when it is not allowed to add relevent information as time progresses. I feel this is more of a personal attack and has nothing to do with the credibility of the information that I add. I am unable to find any common ground for discussion on the way I add information. If you could elaborate on what is going wrong here... SDhivar ( talk) 04:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske. This was mistakenly posted at the Commons Help Desk, and it appears to be related to a {{ welcome-coi}} template you added to the OP's English Wikipedia talk page about a month ago. Just notifying you as a courtesy just in case you want to follow up with the OP on their user talk page. My guess is that the OP hadn't logged in until yesterday, perhaps to add another photo to Commons, and only then saw your post. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please consider switching to the new Move To Draft script. It is fork of the script that you are using, but has some bug fixes, important warnings, and some feature enhancements. Happy editing! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
why was edit removed? WillLikesScience ( talk) 17:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I did a ton of editing on Energy medicine including adding a lot of government sources and citations, and you delete these in favor of one or two sentences you favored. Is that worth reverting over 3,000 words? There was a whole lot I did to that page and I ask for this to be reviewed. Also, I did not delete the "pseudoscience claptrap." I added more to it actually and added more citations to the proper section. Please stop being so hasty to annihilate a substantive edit in its entirety. Be respectful, please. DivineReality ( talk) 04:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
About the 1930/31 football season. I could cite the evidence from Everton's club history sources, but this is easily verifiable because every season has had its final tables published on Wikipedia. I don't mind including a source, but isn't there a policy about LEADCITE? Hope a Dope a Rope ( talk) 14:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Why are you draftifying ( Draft:Martha Tracy Owler) an article on a notable woman journalist that I just started? Please revert yourself. Thank you. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi sorry for that just I want to know why you change my edit in the us state of oregon. I just want to add land borders. Neonbanana ( talk) 01:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Kleuske wikipedia black lists links to Kickstarter campaigns. So not sure how I’m supposed to source his collection on over $25,000.00 and failed to produce a book or return money. Here is one of the photographers posting about her disappointment in Anthony and his failure to return the money to all of the pet parents. 📸 Look at this post on Facebook https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02GMsD6eh6mhMFq8foWRD65ma9cH9vtfKDnVLUQKMxBrNbhfQYu1GZpToUnxrZcQPql&id=645017438&mibextid=xXumFJ Dogsarebetterthanpeople ( talk) 08:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Kleuske
You banned my topic about KushScan - mobile app that recognizes weed by photo. There are a lot of references on independent sources regarding KushScan in my article. What should I fix so you accept the article? Yulika13 ( talk) 16:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi I just wanted to talk about haplgroup F. Someone edited it recently just to remove text and changed the orgins of haplgroup F to west Asia with older sources.
purposly targeting to remove South Asia from the text
also originally you see it says South Asia orgins. With sources https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diff=prev&oldid=1156823998&title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diffonly=1
these are nationalist from iran purposly not wanting to expose to the world that haplgroup F orgins being in South Asia.
as you can see in this edit sources that mention South Asia where removed which you reverted
Here you can see recently they edited by another user into west Asia to remove South Asia on purpose using older sources.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diff=prev&oldid=1199832344&title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diffonly=1
Zishan12345 (
talk) 08:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page. |
New messages at the bottom of the page, please. Messages placed elsewhere will be ignored and/or removed. |
Just a small edit to say thanks a ton for passing along the vandalism report today! Has now been resolved, with the vandal pages deleted. :) Cheers! — JezzaHehn ( talk) 03:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
I made an edit, and left a clear justification in the edit summary. You undid that edit without bothering to explain why, and then left me a talk page message falsely accusing me of not giving a valid reason for my edit. Kindly explain why you did this. Zqzkqzq ( talk) 11:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
I was editing on MQ 9 Reaper page on which you have reverted. I was just rearranging according to alphabet. Please see to it. I ame Shears ( talk) 13:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 21:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Kleuske and MurielMary: perhaps a possible way to go forward here might be draftifying this article for while as an alternative to outright speedy deletion? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 10:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I will. For Areddu I thought it was clear: it was a blogpost. For more context, this person has been banned from italian wikipedia because he is a serial spammer. For Gigi Sanna, well he is a journalist that prints his fringe theories in a printshop. Anyway I'll be more explicit now, -- PedroPistolas ( talk) 18:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, i realised that after i made it, Wikipedia is pretty confusing at first. Reading the Tutorial page as we're speaking, Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by En svensk med kritik ( talk • contribs) 14:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
I request you to hide my edit history to new users and add a semi protection to my userpage because this guy is psycho and a small kidd he is trying every sigle possibility to mess up with me. Thank you Vikassharmasafidon ( talk) 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, where from I can get the list of mods. Vikassharmasafidon ( talk) 09:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am trying to improve the University of Sheffield page. The section about Controversies includes a very subjective section relating to the Archaeology Department. I tried to rewrite this to be more objective but the original author seems to overwrite it with the previous biased entry. The original author appears to have a serious conflict of interest which is apparent in the tone of the piece. The piece includes libellous content in its wording. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.167.254.172 ( talk) 11:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
You reverted my revision as of 13:08, 14 October 2021 at Köchel catalogue and asked for a source. Well, I actually wrote the revision according to this page Church Sonatas (Mozart). Apparently it is wrong. Rômulo de Assunção Rondon Mello ( talk) 00:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up on my page for the company I have a COI with [ Life Technology Ltd]. I hopefully have declared it properly. I've not used Wikipedia in a few years and I cant remember my old email (lost account) or username so I started from scratch, but hopefully I will be able to help out the community again. Please let me know if there are any issues and i will do my best to correct them. Ultimatum020 ( talk) 12:34, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Paid editors must provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise, solicit or obtain paid Wikipedia-editing services. If such an account is deleted or removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week.
It was on De Klerk himself, and it's not as if he's here to be offended, now is he? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.73.228.124 ( talk) 10:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, you've noted that i sourced poorly on the wikipage "Shitcoin". I agree and would like to rectify the mistakes I made, but I'm unable to do so as a semi-protection has been placed, and I can no longer edit pages. I will likely be the editor for this page for a good while, so please "unblock" me. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Weissmann ( talk • contribs) 16:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome wagon :) Do you have an interest in animation as well? 18bwhite4 ( talk) 20:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, just a quick note to say I've undone the removal of a block notice from the talk page of ENCYCLOBOYS - not your edit, but there has been some back-and-forth that you were involved in and you were one of those who removed it. Please remember that users are more than welcome to remove messages sent to them (with few exceptions which do not cover this - it's not a declined unblock request, it's not a deletion tag, it's not a shared IP notice). This also means that (in my opinion) it's probably not the greatest idea to have used rollback to undo the removal either, as it doesn't give the opportunity for you to explain why. stwalkerster ( talk) 19:08, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you left a message on my talk page that I've removed Twitter link of her but in the guidelines there are social media links are don't allow that's why I've removed ... Can you explain me more about it ??? Truedboner ( talk) 10:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Kleuske so self post Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, also allowed as citation ???
At
Lynching you reverted me with the edit summary Don't lie in edit summaries. Thanks
. I think that was a clear violation of
WP:NPA as well as
WP:AGF. You self-reverted, giving Ooops
as your edit summary. That's neither an apology nor an explanation. So I asked for an explanation on that article's talk page in a discussion you had already started regarding a different issue. I'm sure that I didn't violate any rules, because a good discussion is virtually impossible while one part accuses the other of lying. That's why had to be clarified before the discussion could go on. Please remember that I wrote that before you apologized. The discussion then went on on my talk page, I made a comment that was clearly trying to end the discussion in a peaceful manner, and then you said, The "I'm not happy with your reaction" feeling is very much mutual.
I asked for an explanation, you haven't answered so far. I did nothing wrong, but you did. What is it you keep complaining about, wasting your time and mine ?
Rsk6400 (
talk) 19:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
The point of noting that dwarves, elves, goblins and trolls are also on the same list as hobbits is in response to Shippey's claim that it's a list of bodiless ghosts, which is untrue. There are many creatures on that list that are commonly held to be corporeal. Plus your claim that "The creatures mentioned are all fairly well known in various mythologies" is untrue, many of them are well-known but many are almost extremely obscure. Moreover, you claimed that the last bit, which could be taken as editorializing I admit, is what you wanted the source for. I omitted it from the second edit (which you noted), but you still reversed it even though I added a direct link to the factual statements made. So since everything written was sourced, it seems you're reversing it for relevance, but it is clearly relevance because it contextualizes the quote from Shippey. Shippey's quote cherry-picks a very small bit of the text and draws a conclusion from it. As it stands now, you're happy to have Shippey's false claim stand. The list of creatures is NOT a list of disembodied ghosts. It is a mix of corporeal and incorporeal creatures of all kinds. Ifyffe ( talk) 20:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Shippey's quote cherry-picks a very small bit of the text and draws a conclusion from it.Please read WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. We try to summarize what reliable sources say on a topic. Wikipedians do not insert their own conclusions.
The paragraph is talking about binary, so I switched the qualifier "decimal" to "binary." However, it's not true that pi couldn't be written in digits of any base whatsoever. Also, I think it's inarguable that "amount" and putting it in a footnote are incorrect. Also, thank you for the welcome. Wuffuwwuf ( talk) 14:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome! I don't know how often I'll be able to be active, but I enjoy translation and hope I can find some pages on other Wikipedias that can contribute to the English Wikipedia. Copyedit & Translate ( talk) 14:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Re [1]: looks like he did do it again. I've reverted manually. Now what? Thanks. Marnanel ( talk) 13:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Please stop restoring the edits on East Timor, they are from an abusive LTA farm. That is why they included really dumb tags. CMD ( talk) 11:53, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Hard to see how my opinion is any different from a number of 'proper' historians who have ignored parliamentary and other contemporary records in order to add Cromwell's name to their site. There was no military action using heavy artillery in the Eastern Borders in either 1648 or 1650, when Cromwell passed through the area. Fact. The story was generated in the nineteenth century and has been peddled ever since. Cromwell's Letters and Speeches have been course material ever since people have questioned the peddled history. Obviously, I do not have the essential academic credentials to understand Lead (or the affected 'lede') So we will just let the story stand before the thought police react. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cromwelled ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, Kleuske, this is my fault, I'm won't breaking any wikipedia rules at next time, this account is not a vandalism-only account Plutonium-244 RE 1797-84 ( talk) 09:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
Fast and fair replier. RKPARAS ( talk) 10:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
looked nice and happy :( Sjobenrit ( talk) 08:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
It meets WP:A7, tag it for speedy deletion instead. Neither pass WP:POLITICIAN nor WP:GNG. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 15:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello. An edit I made in the football section of the De La Salle (Concord, Calif.) High School page has been reversed for not having a source. It concerned a statement which itself is unsourced, claiming DLS played in every CIF Open Division state title game from the division’s inception in 2008 through 2019. That the Spartans run actually began in 2009 is something that can be verified on the CIF State page, among other places. ShakesTheClown46 ( talk) 07:09, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
{ /info/en/?search=User_talk:DwenDisciple#I_am_not_sure_if_you_are_trolling_or_just_lack_competence,_but_your_edit_to_Elder_Evils_was_unacceptable] See my comment. Doug Weller talk 11:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1110487246 Vedprakash Singh VPS ( talk) 07:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1110668287 Vedprakash Singh VPS ( talk) 13:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Yikes, I just noticed, and revised the edit and summary.... thanks for watching. It does get just a little hair-raising from time to time. Haploidavey ( talk) 10:45, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello!
I have edited several articles and would like to discuss your edits.
1. /info/en/?search=Auto_auction
I would like to supplement the sentence "There are also auctions that are open to the public in a few states like New Hampshire and Pennsylvania" with the fact that in addition to these states, open auctions for the public also operate in other states (about Canada, I agree - a new paragraph is needed ).
2. /info/en/?search=Salvage_title
Here I wanted to add information that there are relevant auctions, I think it would be interesting. After all, I didn’t even highlight any links, the information was presented, in my opinion, quite unbiased.
3. /info/en/?search=Used_car
In external links there is a site "Vincheck". At the bottom of their page there are links to other sources, I wanted to supplement the Wikipedia article with these sources.
4. /info/en/?search=Robot_welding
Very sorry for the removal of the link. ABAGY really has a lot of good materials, on the basis of which the article about robot welding was written.
Could you tell me how to fix this carefully so that my edits are not deleted?
I hope my English doesn't bother you - it's not my native language.
Ekaterina Mosolova (
talk) 11:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you stop adding back incorrect information that has been leading to the image abuse and trolling of this artist Deborah Gray. You are not an expert on this person nor have the right to add to the abuse of her reputation and information on line Edenleaf ( talk) 15:14, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey there! Regarding your recent revert on Edilli, did you look into the content that was removed? Azerbaijani government sources (which are not reliable) had been used as a basis to create a "Mass graves"-section for the geographic article that was twice as large as the size of the other content. I replaced the recently added material with a shorter, more neutral mention from a third-party source. AntonSamuel ( talk) 09:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
As an example of war crimes, or crimes against humanity, most of them had their legs tied with wire and rope.Strangely your edit does not mention that, even though it is, by your standards, properly sourced. I am not opposed to a rewording, even if it’s shorter, but failure to mention things like that, even though they are mentioned in your preferred source, is not acceptable. Kleuske ( talk) 10:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Correction. You find it highly problematic, because you declared all news outlets of an entire country non-reliable. Reducing this (reported by multiple sources) to “some guy reported” is WP:WHITEWASHING. If you did the same in other articles, that’s “highly problematic”. Kleuske ( talk) 15:56, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, if you could provide a more detailed explanation of why you are removing the "List of Exmor sensors" section that'd be great. There's no other list like this on the internet and it's a great resource when you need to look up specs of a sensor and what phones they are used in. To me it doesn't seem like there's a good reason for this to be removed. Clearly others think so also as they keep reverting it. Gamesrule 0 ( talk) 01:36, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you tagged an article for A7 [10] just one minute after creation. Doing so is strongly discouraged, especially for certain criteria such as A7, as the creator might still be actively working on the page and such a hasty tagging could be perceived as a WP:BITE. In general, unless a page is patent nonsense (G1), vandalism (G3), attack (G10), or copyvio (G12), it's often appropriate to wait at least 10–15 minutes, and sometimes at least an hour, before adding a speedy deletion tag. They might very well improve the page such that it no longer qualifies for A7 during this time, and won't be discouraged from doing so. Cheers, Complex/ Rational 15:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Tagging anything other than attack pages, copyvios, vandalism or complete nonsense for deletion shortly after creation may stop the creation of a good faith article and drive away a new contributor. Outside these exceptions, articles less than an hour old should not be nominated for deletion, blanked and redirected or moved to draftspace.We do have A7 for a reason – to bypass AfD/PROD for articles about subjects that have no credible claim of significance and probably can't be improved to a point that such a hypothetical AfD might close with a keep (e.g., one's own vanity page, or an "article" someone writes about their pet). Complex/ Rational 15:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello- You provided some information to me about proper posting and conflict of interest and reverted the postings I made back to the original. However, the "sports bra" page is missing information that has been there for a long time. I'm not sure who first added it, but the line is:
'"The first commercially available sports bra was the "Free Swing Tennis Bra" introduced by Glamorise Foundations, Inc. in 1975."'
Could this please be added back to the posting as it was before I made any changes? Thanks for your help! Sremo44 ( talk) 20:10, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to leave you a note about why I declined the U5 on User:DutchTB. U5 was recently revised in this edit as a result of this discussion. The key part of U5 at issue is that it requires that the editor have "few or no edits outside of user pages". DutchTB has 26 edits outside userspace here on EN, and quite a few on other projects such as nl and commons.
That said, that userpage is concerning, and more concerning is the comments he made about it which, if we take them at face value, indicate an inappropriate ownership attitude and an admission that the content is "not related to the purpose Wikipedia serves" (although I'm wondering if that's an error due to missing words or language barriers).
I did do a bit of a search to see if Tom de Beer is a real person who ran in the 2022 Municipal Council Elections in Laarbeek or not, and I couldn't find any confirmation, but given I was searching English language media I'm not surprised.
At any rate, I would suggest you consider taking the page to WP:MFD, as it may need discussion by the broader community. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 21:30, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
I understand that I didn't write it in a equal or third person perspective but the sources i gave where pretty much reliable.. It was his own youtube page....okay i could understand the reddit part not being reliable, But the youtube page were Floppyboppy ( talk) 16:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Please have a look at the Chekavar page as well, there's a lot of paragraphs there saying that they were:
A "warrior surname", "exceptionally talented martial artists", "they were a warrior caste who fought for their rulers", "formed the army of the Chera Empire", "During the British rule, seeing their chivalric fighting skills which can be attributed to their Chekavar lineages," etc.
Seems like many unsourced sentences there, kindly remove these to improve the article.
Warm regards TheWanderer9 ( talk) 13:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I have an Wikipedia account. I already downloaded Wikipedia app. I have approx. 250 EDITS on wikipedia. I am "logged on" in wikipedia mobile app, I wanted to create a page but I was having some trouble editing in the app, so when I tried to log in to create some pages in the web browser, I got a warning in red letters above, so I read it. I went to log out of my account in the app, but in no time I got a message that I have been blocked. I am innocent, now you say that my only mistake was to help create a Wikipedia page. I already sent an appeal for unblock.
Help me Kleuske! Akashkumar39 ( talk) 14:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske! As per your suggestion on my talk page within the welcome message, I decided to turn to you for help. A month ago (more or less) I created a draft dedicated to Dario Scannapieco, the CEO of Cassa Depositi e Prestiti ( here), starting from the translation of the existing Italian article. I was wondering if you could give me an opinion, whether it would be okay or what needs to be improved. I would like to do everything I can to improve the draft and to be fully compliant with Wikipedia rules, since I have a conflict of interest with the topic. Thanks in advance! Silvifan ( talk) 15:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you reverted some of my edits on the Bending Spoons page because of WP:PROMO. While I could improve on this edit, yesterday's diff is merely an updated on outdated company information, and not promotional by any means. I'd work on the edits to fix them, and revert to this version in the meantime if you're fine with it. What do you think? FarewellTransmission ( talk) 11:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello there,
I have been attempting to update the page for Sense Scotland as I had noticed the information is out of date. Would you possibly be able to proofread this and publish if you agree with the changes? You can find the draft here.
Apologies, I am new to editing on Wikipedia so I may not be using the right process to request this.
GabeWiki2023 ( talk) 14:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Dear, you have undone my edits about malegaon, as there is no reliable source as per your decision, no worries i just wanted to add missing info so i have added the data, i was born and brought up in malegaon and i am also owner of malegaon live news channel ( https://malegaonlive.com) so i think i have better knowledge of city. anyways its all up to you ! thanks Jayyogeshpagare ( talk) 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske
I would like to ask, if you don't mind, why you undid my revert in the above named article. A simple and quick analysis of the cited sourced shows two of them, Curta and Madgearu do not say what the editor claimed they said, and a third one, Transylvania and the Hungarian-Romanian problem it's not even written by the author the editor claimed. Aristeus01 ( talk) 18:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Exmor".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
— AP 499D25 (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of AMD Ryzen processors § Inclusion of prices in the tables. — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello there! I'm pretty new to Wikipedia editing in general, and was browsing Bruno Peres' page, and noticed the link to his FIFA stats is down, so just updated that to a new link, and thought the small paragraph about his FIFA card was a nice addition so went ahead and added it to a few more players. All of them were reverted so I assume I did something wrong. Just wanted to reach out and check what it was so that I can work on it in the future. Thanks! Andyabihaidar ( talk) 15:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ruthika, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac ( talk) 15:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
I am trying to update his biography. You are constantly undoing it without any particular reason. May I know what's wrong with it? StallinEditor ( talk) 12:13, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Under Mittal's leadership, RGU has grown to include a community of over 3.9 million gamers and has distributed over $251 million in winnings annually.That's WP:PROMO. Kleuske ( talk) 12:23, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske, I'm MichaelBotts. I tried to edit the history of the Kirtland Temple on the list of temples, including a reference. Why was this deleted? The present reference to the Kirtland Temple implies that the temple belongs to the LDS church, although the temple is owned and operated by the Community of Christ. MichaelBotts ( talk) 08:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
It’s like playing whack a mole on that page. He is notable enough to warrant one, but he’s treating it like his personal resume. Talk page notices have been ignored. Afheather ( talk) 16:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Is AIV on you watchlist? How did you know i did that? 208.184.20.249 ( talk) 15:55, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Westlake High School (Texas), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kyle Adams and Scott Spann. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske,
We are Youngsters wanting to bring work of good NGOs in limelight. This NGO is doing remarkable work and this article is written after visiting their workshops and seeing their work as a neutral person. 
If you just point out the words or sentences which you feel is a misrepresentation or 'marketing', we can remove that text.
You have removed the entire work without any explanation. 
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Regards, 
Saurabh SDhivar ( talk) 10:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
“Don’t take your organs to the heaven for God know they are needed here”is promotion and it's far from the only example I could cite. I wish the NGO all kinds of success, but Wikipedia is not the place for that. Kleuske ( talk) 10:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Enlightenment fan ( talk) 02:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
...Pmnedus criticized your writing style. It took it upon myself to reply that in the face of obtuse persistance, "Just stop it" was a valid comment. David notMD ( talk) 11:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
What I'm adding is from the transcript of the source. 94.66.59.9 ( talk) 18:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Apologies. My favourite site, Fragrantica, which I used for refs, has a little section called "great deals at EBay" which I tend to overlook (since it's Ebay, not Fragrantica itself). After a little argue, I was told there is an issue with that and therefore, my edits looked as some kind of promotion. I accept that point. I am going to revert my edits only to carve away unnecessary links for modern fragnances - and leave Fragrantica entries for older, mostly discontinued fragnances like Fumee or 1937 feminine Old Spice. 81.89.66.133 ( talk) 11:20, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
You removed most of my edits to sections Significance and Relativity in the page Electromagnetic tensor ( /info/en/?search=Electromagnetic_tensor#Significance).
Those were nothing but generalizations of math already available in page Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime ( /info/en/?search=Maxwell's_equations_in_curved_spacetime#Electromagnetic_field).
Elementary math of covariant differentiation means that one of Maxwell's laws in tensor notation is always homogeneous ().
I think that it is very important to draw a conclusion here. Physically, that means that the classic (not quantized) EM field theory leaves no room for magnetic monopoles or currents of such to act as sources of the field. That is because the EM tensor is an exterior derivative of the EM four-potential.
I recall my high-shool teacher saying that the classic Maxwell equations written in terms of 3-vectors permit non-zero density of magnetic monopoles and non-zero current density of those, but we haven't found such experimentally (yet).
Four-tensor formulation and the nature of the EM four-tensor guarantees that there cannot be magnetic monopoles or currents of such.
Another important remark that I had added was that the expression relating the EM tensor to the EM four-potential is preserved in curved spacetime (the covariant derivatives are reduced to partial derivatives as in the Minkovskian case, yet the expression transforms as an absolute four-tensor). That means that the components of the curved spacetime (the connection coefficient terms from the covariant derivatives that cancel each other) do not affect the values of the EM tensor; those are defined solely by the underlying four-potential field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G.yordanov ( talk • contribs) 14:25, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
References
You reported the user for their username just thought you should know the username is part of an LTA pattern: WP:LTA/HOY. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 12:52, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
You have reverted most of the edits I have made over the last month or so. The information that I had updated the Marina Centre page can be retrieved from the official government agency website responsible for zoning in Singapore.
As such, I would like to reup my edits on the Wikipedia page. Please let me know what the issue was for the edits to be reverted. Placemaker joshua ( talk) 07:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
I had edited the introduction section keeping the wikipedia guidelines on puffery and neutrality in mind but I see that any changes I do you only undo the efforts without any explanation. What is the point on having a wikipedia page when it is not allowed to add relevent information as time progresses. I feel this is more of a personal attack and has nothing to do with the credibility of the information that I add. I am unable to find any common ground for discussion on the way I add information. If you could elaborate on what is going wrong here... SDhivar ( talk) 04:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Kleuske. This was mistakenly posted at the Commons Help Desk, and it appears to be related to a {{ welcome-coi}} template you added to the OP's English Wikipedia talk page about a month ago. Just notifying you as a courtesy just in case you want to follow up with the OP on their user talk page. My guess is that the OP hadn't logged in until yesterday, perhaps to add another photo to Commons, and only then saw your post. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please consider switching to the new Move To Draft script. It is fork of the script that you are using, but has some bug fixes, important warnings, and some feature enhancements. Happy editing! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:43, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
why was edit removed? WillLikesScience ( talk) 17:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I did a ton of editing on Energy medicine including adding a lot of government sources and citations, and you delete these in favor of one or two sentences you favored. Is that worth reverting over 3,000 words? There was a whole lot I did to that page and I ask for this to be reviewed. Also, I did not delete the "pseudoscience claptrap." I added more to it actually and added more citations to the proper section. Please stop being so hasty to annihilate a substantive edit in its entirety. Be respectful, please. DivineReality ( talk) 04:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
About the 1930/31 football season. I could cite the evidence from Everton's club history sources, but this is easily verifiable because every season has had its final tables published on Wikipedia. I don't mind including a source, but isn't there a policy about LEADCITE? Hope a Dope a Rope ( talk) 14:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Why are you draftifying ( Draft:Martha Tracy Owler) an article on a notable woman journalist that I just started? Please revert yourself. Thank you. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi sorry for that just I want to know why you change my edit in the us state of oregon. I just want to add land borders. Neonbanana ( talk) 01:40, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
@ Kleuske wikipedia black lists links to Kickstarter campaigns. So not sure how I’m supposed to source his collection on over $25,000.00 and failed to produce a book or return money. Here is one of the photographers posting about her disappointment in Anthony and his failure to return the money to all of the pet parents. 📸 Look at this post on Facebook https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02GMsD6eh6mhMFq8foWRD65ma9cH9vtfKDnVLUQKMxBrNbhfQYu1GZpToUnxrZcQPql&id=645017438&mibextid=xXumFJ Dogsarebetterthanpeople ( talk) 08:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Kleuske
You banned my topic about KushScan - mobile app that recognizes weed by photo. There are a lot of references on independent sources regarding KushScan in my article. What should I fix so you accept the article? Yulika13 ( talk) 16:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi I just wanted to talk about haplgroup F. Someone edited it recently just to remove text and changed the orgins of haplgroup F to west Asia with older sources.
purposly targeting to remove South Asia from the text
also originally you see it says South Asia orgins. With sources https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diff=prev&oldid=1156823998&title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diffonly=1
these are nationalist from iran purposly not wanting to expose to the world that haplgroup F orgins being in South Asia.
as you can see in this edit sources that mention South Asia where removed which you reverted
Here you can see recently they edited by another user into west Asia to remove South Asia on purpose using older sources.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diff=prev&oldid=1199832344&title=Haplogroup_F-M89&diffonly=1
Zishan12345 (
talk) 08:35, 1 March 2024 (UTC)