The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:GNG and is a case of WP:BLP1E as a failed judicial nominee. Let'srun ( talk) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Lacks reliable sources. Much of the article appears to be a weak synthesis of published articles which do not support the main thrust of the article. Geoff | Who, me? 15:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This is not a suburb just a small neighbourhood in Edinburgh fails to meet WP:GNG 1keyhole ( talk) 13:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Parques Reunidos. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I suggest merging Palace Entertainment into Parques Reunidos, as Palace Entertainment always was or has become an unncessary spinoff. 90% of the source is already rehashed at the target. The question here is NOT NOTABILITY so there is no need to delete Palace Entertainment or to look for sources! RATHER, the question is that of information governance. Thank you all for considering how each one of our articles could become sensible to carry so articles won't overlap and insult the intelligence of the reader! gidonb ( talk) 16:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Live album which does not appear to pass WP:NALBUM. Based on a before search it does not appear to have charted, won an award, or received enough significant coverage for a stand alone article. Nominating to be redirected to Humble Pie, the band who recorded the album. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Page is written like an advertisement, which is surmountable, but there doesn't appear to be sufficient sourcing to warrant keeping the page even once it's properly rewritten. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Confessions of a Teenage Jesus Jerk. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR for only making one important role in a notable work, Confessions of a Teenage Jesus Jerk. This is not enough to satisfy NACTOR. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 23:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. If more reliable sources are found or the content is improved and passes AFC review, a move to main space can be considered. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Poorly written article about a film, not
properly referenced as having any serious claim to passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of their significance (notable awards,
WP:GNG-worthy critical analysis in reliable source media, etc.) -- but existence is about the only notability claim being made here, and the referencing is parked entirely on
blogs, directory entries (Letterboxd, IMDb), YouTube videos and
user-generated "anybody can submit any self-created 'news' they want to" platforms, with not a whit of GNG-worthy coverage in legitimate media shown at all.
In addition it warrants note that this was created in userspace, then moved by its creator into mainspace, then draftified by an established editor for the same reasons as I'm listing it now, but then got moved back into mainspace by the creator without any substantive improvement — but that's not the appropriate process, and I don't see much point in redraftifying it again if the creator is going to just keep remainspacing it himself.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this film from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ArcAngel
(talk) 23:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to see if there is more support for Draftification or Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
acceptable as signed by their authors:
Reviewers tracked by Rotten Tomatoes are not automatically reliable for their reviews, while there is no consensus on whether their "Top Critics" are generally reliable.
The result was redirect to Adrienne Bailon-Houghton. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
I could not find evidence of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources. The Billboard source currently used in the article is solid, but one source does not justify a separate article, and I could not find evidence of further coverage outside of that single source. Aoba47 ( talk) 23:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability criteria failure. Lots of one sentence trivial mention in numerous CMJ magazines, and other mentions elsewhere like "Many emo bands of the late 90s signed to indie labels including Jade Tree Records, Saddle Creek, and Big Wheel Recreation." but sources that satisfy ORGDEPTH not found. Graywalls ( talk) 22:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
this is a label that made significant and lasting impacts on musical culturethen prove it. Provide widely circulated mainstream citation that corroborates the supposed significant and lasting impact on culture. As an example, PBS states in their own voice about Thomas Edison:
Edison invented or refined devices that made a profound impact on how people lived[1]. Now, let's see something of equal caliber crediting Big Wheel Recreation for making a profound impact on music culture. Graywalls ( talk) 00:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL as it meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:ORG. Searches in English and Bengali found nothing but passing mentions and indiscriminate directory listings. Without significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, should not be a stand alone article. Worldbruce ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 22:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
As per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. All the sources are from March 2013 when the event happened. LibStar ( talk) 23:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. Could not find reliable, secondary source significant coverage. Only source cited on article that offers this is a primary source from UMass. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mossad. The previous AFD was closed as No consensus but there was a solid contingent of editors asking for a Merge/Redirect so I'm willing to close this discussion now even though there has been low participation. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Propose redirect and merge into Mossad. If you take out all the unsourced pop culture references, there are really only 3 sentences of well-sourced and additive content in this article. Would be better suited in the main Mossad article. AfD discussion was no consensus, with strong support for merging. Since then, the article has been winnowed down. Longhornsg ( talk) 21:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G4. Page was an exact copy of an article that was G4-deleted just two days ago. I've also deleted the two draft pages which were also exact copies. Creator is blocked along with their sock, Ncircle Entertainment ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and the title will be blacklisted. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 21:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Repeatedly created in the exact same manner with zero improvement. First AFD ended up in a merge to another article be this user that has been deleted because it also failed WP:NCORP. Has been moved to AFC and declined several times. I will also nominate this title be salted. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 21:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted in both 2015 and 2020 before being recreated in 2021. I don't see any significant role or significant coverage since previous deletions. Roles are minor and the references are interviews, routine coverage, or unreliable sources. Would recommend salting if deleted. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Qatif conflict#Arab Spring protests 2011–12. Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:CFORK or perhaps a spinout of 2011–2012 Saudi Arabian protests. That page covers the subject, but the spinout is not required and the events in Qatif are not independently notable. The sources in the article are WP:PRIMARY being news reports, and descriptions of the events. There was indeed a series of clashes in Qatif, but these were all part of the 2011-2012 Saudi protests and there is no evidence in sources that the Qatif clashes were given exception coverage nor particular analysis outside of that. Secondary sources do not cover this subject outside of the larger Saudi Arabian protests subject. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a Merge and, if so, to which target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Primary sources may include newspaper articles, letters, diaries, interviews, laws, reports of government commissions, and many other types of documents."A contemporary newspaper report of an event is a primary source. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
most news stories are considered primary sources. There are cases where they can be secondary, but they involve historical perspective or later synthesis of other sources (often news articles themselves). An example is an article about a battle that has just happened (primary) versus a war retrospective years later that uses that frontline reporting as a source (secondary). Your average news article, such as those linked here, are clearly of the primary variety. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 16:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or ask at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON. Draftify for now. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to see if there is additional support for Draftifying from those advocating Delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least one cap for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Since a PROD was removed without any reason given by an IP, we need to follow the AfD process. The biography covers a non-notable contestant in a non-notable pageant, Miss Exclusive. The article's single source is not a RS; see WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources which indicates world360news.com, which dubiously titles itself "Chhattisgarh News" aka chhattisgarh.news, is probably SPS. ☆ Bri ( talk) 18:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Secondary source significant coverage not found. Only sigcov is from the Harvard Crimson, a primary source as it's the school's official student newspaper. This is also primary. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 18:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article has been greatly expanded since its AFD nomination, looking for editors to assess whether changes are enough to establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. The subject has earned three caps for the Luxembourg women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Luxembourg women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. leaning Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Neologistic expanded WP:DICTDEF. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
10:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Category indicates it is an abandoned project so doesn't have any expectation of gaining any notability. Fails WP:GNG. Additionally, article was created by the creator of the topic. Perhaps a merger into another article to fulfill WP:ATD. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article has been created on both the French and Arabic Wikipedia by the same user (Cross-wiki), who appears to have a potential conflict of interest as they may be affiliated with the company or have a vested interest. They have uploaded a high-resolution picture of the journalist, the article itself seems to lack objective and comprehensive content about the journalist. Instead, the focus appears to be primarily on their nomination as the head of the channel, rather than providing a well-rounded sources about their career or accomplishments. Riad Salih ( talk) 14:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I generally don't challenge opinions in an AFD discussion, but I don't think "no enough sources" is valid here. The sources might be passing mentions and not sufficient to establish GNG but there are quite a few present in this article. Relisting in hope of a more serious review of sources present in the article and others that might be present online.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability. He never played for the senior national team. only played for the youth level teams. yes he played for some pro clubs but that's not enough to makes him notable. also you rarely can find anything about him in English or even Persian sources. Sports2021 ( talk) 14:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As we have all learned over the past year and a half, participation on a team isn't enough for a stand alone article on Wikipedia but coverage by secondary, independent sources that is required. If that doesn't exist, is there an appropriate Redirect target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Creation of a redirect to an appropriate target is at editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not really sure how to class this, a blog? An academic journal (as suggested by the infobox)? In any case, this is not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 13:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is No consensus now on what should become of this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shippo (company). Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Company she founded already has an article on Wikipedia, but the references cited for the material in this article doesn’t show any significant coverage in her name, forbes 30-30 mentioned only, entrepreneur (an interview), BBC just another mention she probably passes General Notability but there’s no independent sources maybe too soon? Autograph ( talk) 12:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess changes in the article since it was nominated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:59, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if this one passes WP:NORG. The article is completely promotional and really says very little. Checking for secondary sources finds some fluff PR pieces. Qcne (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
As Poimenlaon suggests on the talk page, this article appears to be a well-crafted hoax: Gerber, who is repeatedly cited, does not even mention a poet named Philodoppides. Neither do Callimachus frr. 439-40 or Maciver. The two important modern reference works ( Oxford Classical Dictionary and Brill's New Pauly) carry no hint of this supposed poet. Everything points to this article's being a hoax and as such it should be deleted. Modussiccandi ( talk) 18:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Former member of the hard rock band Burden Brothers but individually fails WP:NMUSIC and is not notable enough to have his own article. References all mention him a single time as a former member of said band and I could find no other sigcov. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK1, withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 12:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass notability guidelines for academics - professional career is rather standard for any professor in the field. He does have a few books, though data on them is (to my cursory look) limited. Happy to be corrected by someone with more expertise in the field, but seemingly apt for deletion. A MINOTAUR ( talk) 15:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Large number of non-IS sources. WP:TNT candidate, though likely fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, never won a medal. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 15:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a minor political fringe candidate, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to permanent notability. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles on that basis per se -- the notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates must either (a) have a valid claim of preexisting notability for other reasons independent of their candidacies (the
Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) show a credible reason why they should be seen as special cases of significantly greater and more enduring notability than other candidates (the
Christine O'Donnell test).
But the only real claim of significance on offer here is the quirkiness of his platform, which is not of enduring importance in and of itself (a lot of "oddball" candidates run on platforms that could be seen as weird), and the referencing isn't really cutting it in terms of getting him over
WP:GNG: four of the seven footnotes are just raw tables of election results (which aren't support for the notability of losing candidates at all), and two more are Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person (which are acceptable as supplementary sourcing for stray facts after GNG has already been covered off by third-party coverage, but are not in and of themselves bringers of the GNG as they aren't independent of the subject.) So there's only one footnote that represents a journalist writing about him in the third person, which isn't enough coverage to get him over the bar all by itself.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleted by ComplexRational after moving back to its original title, Chandni FC, in moving without leaving a redirect. Procedurally closing this AfD, as the article is deleted. (non-admin closure) Tartar Torte 19:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
I was going to tag this for WP:G4, but at this point it seems a bit controversial to do so as this page was already deleted via WP:G4 in July by ComplexRational after a nomination per myself, the deletion log is here. This page was located at Chandni FC until 20 August 2023, which would have at certain points made either Al Madeena Cherpulassery in its previous form from July or Chandni FC (but unsure which of the two) eligible for deletion due to WP:A10; however, there are no specific speedy deletion criteria here. There is a Draft:Al Madeena Cherpulassery which appears to be about the same topic as this article which was dratified right after the page was deleted via G4 in July. With all of that information out of the way, it seems that the issues about this article from the AfD back in 2022 are still an issue. This team does not appear to pass WP:GNG. It seems that given some of the issues with indeffed/socked participants in the previous AfD pointed out by others since the close of the previous AfD to regain consensus on this article. Tartar Torte 13:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Mayor of a small municipality in Denmark with a population of ~26,000. Does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. This realistically should have been a speedy keep under criterion #1, as "I am losing a content dispute" is not a rationale for deletion. But certainly as it stands, the result here is clearly that this subject is notable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This article is often being used as an attack page on "Vishwananda", which a disrespectful way to address Paramahamsa Vishwananda. Many of the citations are linked to tabloid-like websites and websites that have a personal bias towards a Hindu Guru (e.g. Evangelical Church in Germany). I have been trying to edit this article by being objective, hence I have not removed the sexual allegations about "Vishwananda", but I have tried added factual events, such as him being the first person born outside of India to be initiated as a "Mahamandaleshwar" and have linked to the news article about this. The other editors, namely Hanumandas, have undone all the objective facts about this due to their own motive of attack. The tone of the article is also very questionable, specifically, those of Hanumandas. I can add more clarification if necessary and more information to state my case if needed. Shiva is Love ( talk) 12:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
non-notable soft drink from sweden, cannot find sources that is unrelated to the british version — Karnataka talk 12:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eugene Tssui#Proposals and city planning projects. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for sources since 2010, and still relies on a single blog post and one SPS page; does not satisfy WP:GNG. François Robere ( talk) 12:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Has been tagged for sources since 2017, and still unsourced. François Robere ( talk) 12:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
SourcesAll universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)
The article notes from Google Translate: "In fact, Yucai High School has already established its status as a "famous school for curriculum reform" across the country. As early as 2004, Yucai became one of the two "National Curriculum Reform Model Schools of the Ministry of Education" in Shenzhen, and made a lot of explorations in curriculum reconstruction and classroom reform. For example, in 2004, the school proposed the education model of "three teachers in one" (the three teachers refer to the teacher, class teacher and tutor), and then continued to innovate, and successively implemented the off-campus brain bank plan, independent study plan, primary school teacher plan, "excellent teachers""
The article notes from Google Translate: "Yucai High School, it is one of the earliest schools in the special zone after the establishment of the Shenzhen special zone; it is a school that "dare to be the first" founded by Mr. Yuan Geng, a pioneer of reform and a pioneer of the special zone; The birthplace of "Flower Season and Rainy Season" and the filming location of the film of the same name; it is the first school in the country to offer mental health courses and adolescent sex education courses; the first school in the country to operate a literature club (Chunyun website) on the Internet; It is also the network base school of the National Chinese Campus Literature Alliance, the first overseas Chinese training base school for high schools; the first school in the country to introduce Hong Kong version of English textbooks into the classroom; the first school to introduce "Western Great Originals""
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Article about non-notable physicist created by an WP:SPA. Mostly expounds his crackpot theories and lists his fringe publications. Reference 5 looked at first sight to give him a sliver of notability, but it turns out its a newspaper column written by himself. Tercer ( talk) 12:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of the Month. Spartaz Humbug! 04:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This list has been unsourced for over 10 years, and I see no hope of it ever becoming appropriately-sourced without extensive original research. There is significant concern that this list violates WP:BLP as well; see WP:DEL-REASON 7 and 9.
Related lists for other decades have been redirected to List of Playboy Playmates of the Month, which seems like a good solution to me. The exception to that is List of people in Playboy 1970–1979, where the BLAR was reverted (just as it was here). Consider this a WP:BUNDLE nom, as the exact same concerns apply. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Locally-known educator with no substantial publications or national awards; does not satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. François Robere ( talk) 09:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Maybe next time check the sources before you nominate the article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND. Case of WP:PROMO / WP:ADMASQ. Reference are routine business news. scope_creep Talk 09:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 12:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Foreign relations of Gagauzia. Not wedded to merge target but there is consensus this isn't better off as a standalone article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Relations articles between sovereign states and subnational regions are somewhat uncommon, but could be viable, given good references. This, however, seems like a WP:COATRACK WP:POV article for grievances about Moldovan policy towards Gagauzia, where the actual substance on relations with Turkey is razor thin. Geschichte ( talk) 16:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. As noted by nom, the previous AFD was for a different subject, so soft deletion can be applied here. ✗ plicit 12:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable rugby league player. Fails WP:GNG (previous AFD was for another Ben Gray). J Mo 101 ( talk) 17:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the topic is notable, but that significant areas of the article in its current state fail WP:V and should be removed. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Motionless in White. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable outside the band. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
A very short-lived title where neither the baronetcy nor the sole baronet seem to have done anything noteworthy, they just existed, and are noted as such in a few very exhaustive lists of British nobility. 90% of the article is not about the baronet or the baronetcy, but about their extended family. Perhaps a redirect to a list of 17th c. baronetcies or some such would be the best here, and if no good target is found then deletion. Fram ( talk) 07:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If the article creator wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or request this at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability requirements; WP:NCORP. Sources rely on press releases masquerading as legitimate sources. Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY. RPSkokie ( talk) 06:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Adams political family#Members. ✗ plicit 06:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability isn't inherited. Probably best to just redirect to Adams political family#Members. Clarityfiend ( talk) 06:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
A lot of databases come up to clutter results, so it is hard to tell if I missed anything, but only one article seems to exist about him, which is just a short interview. Seems non-notable. DemonDays64 ( talk• contribs) 06:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tally Hall. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
"Andrew Horowitz" musician
and Andrew Horowitz Tally Hall
both have very few results on Google search. There is only one profile specifically about him
[50]. Nothing else appears to come up focusing on him. Definitely fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMUSICIAN imo.
DemonDays64 (
talk•
contribs) 05:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete Tangential connections to notable artists fails under NOTINHERITED. Delete based on a lack of RS recognition. Largely written and maintained by 2 SPA accounts and unregistered IP addresses, it seems suspiciously self-promotional by the subject himself.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least three caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least four caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
a WP:BIASed selection of purported war crimes conducted largely by the West. The "war crimes" were either not War crimes at the relevant time or were conducted by countries that were not signatories to the relevant international convention(s). This selective retrospective application is non-encyclopaedic and does not belong here. We already have a detailed page on War crimes and specific pages for various events and countries, where all relevant events should be listed. Mztourist ( talk) 04:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
2- I agree that events have a specific page and specific pages and I tried to list all of these on one page. We can change the name of the article to The list of uses of unconventional weapons. M1nhm ( talk) 11:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 04:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "你看過Wikipedia(維基百科)嗎? 12月14日下午政大原民中心邀請到清大物理學系陳柏中副教授、大漢技術學院資訊管理學系楊允言助理教授和台東大學華語文學系張學謙副教授, 分享Wikipedia (維基百科) 台語版本的建置與經營經過, 這是第一次從資訊科學、語言社會學、資訊管理學跨領 ... 陳柏中首先提到,2003年他在美國唸書就參與維基百科的繁體中文與簡體中文之爭,到最後自力更 ... 生成立「Holopedia」的過程,他們從三人創始元老團隊草創爭取Wikipedia中Holo話成為獨立語言的故事。除了努力寫詞條叩關,還面臨技術面的問題與挑戰,最後是還有來自懂網路但不懂母語的寫手,以及其他台語運動低度結合等社群動員面的問題,但是在Holo話以白話字首先扣關維基百科成功後,目前維基百科漢語系下已有粵語、贛語、吳語、文言、客家話、閩東語和潮洲話等8個版本。"
From Google Translate: "Have you read Wikipedia (Wikipedia)? On the afternoon of December 14, the Indigenous Peoples Center of National Chengchi University invited Associate Professor Chen Baizhong, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Assistant Professor Yang Yunyan, Department of Information Management, Dahan Institute of Technology, and Associate Professor Zhang Xueqian, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Taitung University to share about Wikipedia, the establishment and operation of the Taiwanese version [Holopedia]. This is the first time that information science, linguistic sociology, and information management have crossed fields... Chen Baizhong first mentioned that he participated in Wikipedia in 2003 when he was studying in the United States. The struggle between Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, and finally the process of establishing "Holopedia" by self-reliance. They started from the three-person founding veteran team to strive for the Holo language in Wikipedia to become an independent language. In addition to working hard to write entries, there are also technical problems and challenges. Finally, there are writers who understand the Internet but do not understand their mother tongue, and other community mobilization problems such as low integration of Taiwanese language movements, but after the Holo dialect was first linked to Wikipedia with vernacular characters, Wikipedia currently has 8 versions under the Chinese department, including Cantonese, Gan, Wu, Classical, Hakka, Hokkien and Teochew."
The book notes: "Significantly, the second strongest Sinitic language, comprising more than 200,000 articles, is identified as Bân-lâm-gú/Hō-ló-oē, which includes Taiwanese. Even more importantly, since the overwhelming majority of articles are written entirely in the Roman alphabet, the Bân-lâm-gú Wikipedia (also known as Holopedia) is the only Sinitic Wikipedia with virtually no Chinese characters. Obviously, this seems to confirm my previous impression that advocates of an alphabetic Taiwanese orthography have been most active in spreading their aspired standard. Figure 12.1 shows the beginning of the entry ‘Republic of China’ on Holopedia. ... If we take the Holopedia not only as a sign of the vitality of alphabetically written Taiwanese, it turns out that today, like 20 years ago, governmental and non-governmental language planners still do not pull together, in terms of both intensity and substance. It has to be emphasised that individual non-governmental agency in language planning cannot be limited to the Holopedia community."
The book notes: "台文人士在網路商業公司未大量開設類似服務之前,就開始試驗 blog 跟 wiki。在2003 年「暗光鳥ê厝」開始試寫個人 blog( http://lomaji.com/oldblog)。 同時,陳柏中試驗經營「台語文 Weblog 中心」( http://weblog.holopedia.org),軟體則使用時興的 Movable Type。這提供免費的blog 帳號空間給有興趣寫台語文的人士書寫用,最熱鬧之時會吸引數十人。同 (2003) 年,戴凱序跟陳 柏中兩人規劃、設立 Holopedia.net。Holopedia 是一個用wiki技術編寫百科全 書的數位事工,試驗一年後遷移到相同性質的 Wikipedia,變成其台文版(http:// nan.wikipedia.org),到2008年2月已累計有兩千九百多篇文章。"
From Google Translate: "Taiwanese people began to experiment with blogs and wikis before Internet business companies opened a large number of similar services. In 2003, "Dark Light Bird ê Cuo" began to try to write a personal blog ( http://lomaji.com/oldblog). At the same time, Chen Bozhong tried to operate the "Taiwanese Weblog Center" ( http://weblog.holopedia.org), and the software used the fashionable Movable Type. This provides free blog account space for those who are interested in writing Taiwanese language, and it will attract dozens of people at the most lively time. In the same year (2003), Dai Kaixu and Chen Baizhong planned and established Holopedia.net. Holopedia is a digital ministry that uses wiki technology to write encyclopedias. After a year of experimentation, it migrated to Wikipedia of the same nature and became its Taiwanese version ( http://nan.wikipedia.org). By February 2008, it had accumulated There are more than 2,900 articles."
The book notes: "二、台語維基百科: 台語線頂百科全書是2003 年設立,叫做 Holopedia , 2004 年加入維基百科 (Wikipedia) ,到 2013 年 12 月,已經有 11,000 外篇詞條,是用 POJ 寫。當初用POJ 用漢字寫,是經過真濟討論得著結果,主要是若用漢字寫,寫法可能會真無一致。網址 " http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/"。因為是維基百科一部分若是所看這个詞條有其它語言版本,詞條頁面倒爿有選項 ,會使直接連結去語言版本。"
From Google Translate: "2. Taiwanese Wikipedia: The Taiwanese online top encyclopedia was established in 2003, called Holopedia, and joined Wikipedia in 2004. By December 2013, there were already 11,000 foreign entries written in POJ. At the beginning, POJ was written in Chinese characters, which was the result of Zhenji's discussion. The main reason is that if it is written in Chinese characters, the writing method may not be consistent. URL " http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/". Because it is part of Wikipedia, if the entry you are looking at has other language versions, there is an option on the entry page, which will directly link to the language version."
The doctoral dissertation notes: "(b) Taiwanese Wikipedia: Taiwanese Wikipedia (aka Holopedia), which was established in 2003 and included in Wikipedia in 2004, could also be considered as a POJ corpus. There are more than 4,000 articles so far (Wikimedia Foundation, 2004)."
The article notes: "例如: 中文維基百科全書 http://zh.wikipedia.org/、閩南語維基百科 http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/。中文維基百科可做線上繁簡體轉換,解決了兩岸華人輸入和閱讀的問題。除了中文之外,還有使用拼音的閩南語維基百科哦!除了維基百科全書以外, ..."
From Google Translate: "For example: Chinese Wikipedia http://zh.wikipedia.org/, Hokkien Wikipedia http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/. Chinese Wikipedia can do online traditional and simplified conversion, which solves the input and reading problems of Chinese on both sides of the strait. In addition to Chinese, there is also a Hokkien Wikipedia that uses pinyin! In addition to Wikipedia, ..."
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. ✗ plicit 06:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local business that do not satisfy WP:NCORP. Graywalls ( talk) 04:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only one primary source. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Papua New Guinea women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Organization for the Support of Democratic Movement in Taiwan. ✗ plicit 03:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The source 1 is worldcat website, source 2 merely mentioned the magazine's name, source 3 is an interview with the magazine editor, source 4 is a list showcasing the magazine itself, source 5 is a database on a university webpage, and sources 6-8 are all websites of the magazine publisher. In summary, the article lacks reliable third-party sources for an effective introduction. 日期20220626 ( talk) 02:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
After some thought, despite this being a station in Los Angeles, one of the biggest television markets in the US, I cannot see how this low-power station — a former TBN relay turned into another DTV America/HC2/Innovate operation — actually meets the GNG. It appears to have only ever really been a repeater of other networks or stations, with neither the adequate sourcing nor any sort of local content or coverage that would get it anywhere near actual notability; the article also tends to attract unsourced edits of dubious quality, another reason why our old overpresumption of "notability" (based on an essay, which seemed to have these all-diginet stations slip through the cracks pre-2021, rather than GNG) was a bit of an error in hindsight. (This is another station that was part of the failed bulk nomination of HC2/Innovate station articles that intermingled stations like this one with facilities that have slightly more substantial histories; the history here isn't quite as threadbare as some of the newer DTV America stations that went from application to license surrender in about a decade, but it isn't much better.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting subject to a previous AFD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K04QR-D so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of The Book of Boba Fett characters. Merge is a common outcome from AFD Spartaz Humbug! 04:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Garsa Fwip is an extremely minor character whose reception consists of only three sources, two of which are simple lists. I'm not even sure why she has a page to begin with. Unnamed anon ( talk) 01:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is currently no consensus and certainly no consensus to Delete. I encourage the nominator,
User:Unnamed anon to refrain from commenting on every remark in this AFD discussion or you could be blocked from participating in this discussion due to bludgeoning. You've made your nomination and views known, you don't need to counter every opinion that disagrees with your own. It certainly won't convince anyone to agree with your perspective.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NJUDGE as a failed judicial nominee. Perhaps redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies? Let'srun ( talk) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Gael Baudino. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
A bit of a large one - I'm wondering if *any* of these books as well as this "series" page should have pages. From what I can tell this is a minor fantasy series with very little engagement over time. Every book as well as the "series" page cites the same 2 references, both of which come from the same niche journal. Most all content on these pages is summarizing plot events rather than denoting any particular notability of the works. While not a formal metric, searching the books today results in "fan groups" of <100 people, suggesting the books also don't carry much widespread consumer notability.
If the consensus is to delete - I am unclear on if an XfD must be made for each book, as it seems to be an "all or nothing" situation. A MINOTAUR ( talk) 16:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting to
Gael Baudino?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 01:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject lacks any secondary sources here to meet the WP:GNG, and there doesn't appear to be much elsewhere. Perhaps redirect this to List of Sirius XM Radio channels? Let'srun ( talk) 01:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not meet WP:GNG or any subject specific notability criteria. Let'srun ( talk) 01:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Taking Out The Trash (
talk) 15:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
international [or] national [...] office? ( WP:NPOL) Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 20:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete – Ambassadors are inherently un-notable. sarcasm Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 16:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notabilityand that is all that has been demonstrated so far. SportingFlyer T· C 12:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I debated on whether to relist this or close it as a keep and I chose to relist it. We're on the keep side of things right now but it's really a weak keep in my opinion. Relisting so hopefully another week sparks a good round of discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 00:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced, stat-only page about a minor event. The best source I found is [54], but WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NEVENT, etc. Is this rescuable? Or merge/redirectable? Note: I am nominating this here after a request at pl wikipedia's AfD at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:08:19:Puchar Chicago 1992, where a number of similar weak articles were nominated, and several have English Wikipedia entries (but very poor, as the one seen herel the two others that may merit discussion on English Wikipedia are Umbro Cup and 1985 Azteca 2000 Tournament). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion include an apparent breach of the biographies of living persons policy, and because this article appears to be contrary to the What Wikipedia is not policy that discourages scandal mongering, so should also be excluded according to the second prong of the notability guideline.
This article was created on 22 December 2022 [55], after the subject began to receive Ottawa-based coverage related to a variety of serious misconduct allegations, including allegations described in an article source headline in terms that can be commonly understood as allegations of criminal conduct. An Ontario-based legal industry publication also reported on allegations in December 2022. Coverage of allegations appears to have begun in November 2022.
This article was brought to AfD on 18 February 2023, and NAC-closed as keep on 4 March 2023 by a now-blocked sock. Since then, the article subject has been criminally charged.
I have tried to find reliable sources to help establish this subject was well-known before and/or independent of 'lawyer is subject to bar disciplinary investigation and license suspension,' 'lawyer is accused of serious misconduct,' 'lawyer is facing criminal charges,' and 'lawyer is relatedly getting sued in a civil action.' With an assist from the prior AfD and article, I have found:
pre-November 2022 sources
|
---|
|
Based on available sources, compliance with WP:BLPSTYLE and WP:BLPBALANCE does not appear possible at this time - specifically writing a biography that is not primarily based on recent coverage related to allegations, investigations, and criminal charges. Since coverage of the allegations began, there are some brief mentions in Ottawa news about his past Freedom Convoy-related social media activity, e.g.
post-November 2022 sources
|
---|
|
Basic biographical and career information also appears to be limited, with the Ottawa Citizen mentioning on 2 Feb 2023 "Born in 1983, Bowie was licensed in 2015 and has worked as a sole practitioner since 2020 in Ottawa" and the general location of his residence. If his own representations about his media activity are included, he seems to have made some appearances in news media to offer comment on Freedom Convoy court proceedings in 2022, but there do not appear to be sources describing him as a well-known news commentator or pundit.
According to more recent sources, he "became known on Twitter"/"known for garnering Twitter followers"/"rose to prominence on social media by chronicling the court appearances of various 'Freedom Convoy' organizers" in 2022, but does not appear to have received contemporary, independent, reliable, in-depth coverage of this. I think WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG notability would not be supported based on what appears to otherwise be available about his career, commentary, and social media activity, and this limited available coverage does not offer a lot to help develop a balanced biography.
In advance of this AfD, I removed content from the article based on WP:BLP policy. Sources remaining in the article are primarily coverage of allegations. So I am bringing this article here for further discussion, because notability does not appear to be well-supported, and it appears BLP policy further supports deletion of this article at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 00:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. The votes to keep at the first AFD were not plentiful, but they were unanimous, User:Loewstisch pointed out how WP:GNG was met and I made the same argument citing news from 2020, 2022 and 2023:
heard through the grapevine. The article is cited. We should not delete content just because the content is scandalous if it is reported in reliable sources. See Category:Scandals for the many dozens of article specifically on scandals.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:GNG and is a case of WP:BLP1E as a failed judicial nominee. Let'srun ( talk) 23:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Lacks reliable sources. Much of the article appears to be a weak synthesis of published articles which do not support the main thrust of the article. Geoff | Who, me? 15:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This is not a suburb just a small neighbourhood in Edinburgh fails to meet WP:GNG 1keyhole ( talk) 13:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Parques Reunidos. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I suggest merging Palace Entertainment into Parques Reunidos, as Palace Entertainment always was or has become an unncessary spinoff. 90% of the source is already rehashed at the target. The question here is NOT NOTABILITY so there is no need to delete Palace Entertainment or to look for sources! RATHER, the question is that of information governance. Thank you all for considering how each one of our articles could become sensible to carry so articles won't overlap and insult the intelligence of the reader! gidonb ( talk) 16:44, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Live album which does not appear to pass WP:NALBUM. Based on a before search it does not appear to have charted, won an award, or received enough significant coverage for a stand alone article. Nominating to be redirected to Humble Pie, the band who recorded the album. Hey man im josh ( talk) 18:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Page is written like an advertisement, which is surmountable, but there doesn't appear to be sufficient sourcing to warrant keeping the page even once it's properly rewritten. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Confessions of a Teenage Jesus Jerk. Liz Read! Talk! 07:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR for only making one important role in a notable work, Confessions of a Teenage Jesus Jerk. This is not enough to satisfy NACTOR. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 23:38, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was Draftify. If more reliable sources are found or the content is improved and passes AFC review, a move to main space can be considered. Liz Read! Talk! 21:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Poorly written article about a film, not
properly referenced as having any serious claim to passing
WP:NFILM. As always, films are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of their significance (notable awards,
WP:GNG-worthy critical analysis in reliable source media, etc.) -- but existence is about the only notability claim being made here, and the referencing is parked entirely on
blogs, directory entries (Letterboxd, IMDb), YouTube videos and
user-generated "anybody can submit any self-created 'news' they want to" platforms, with not a whit of GNG-worthy coverage in legitimate media shown at all.
In addition it warrants note that this was created in userspace, then moved by its creator into mainspace, then draftified by an established editor for the same reasons as I'm listing it now, but then got moved back into mainspace by the creator without any substantive improvement — but that's not the appropriate process, and I don't see much point in redraftifying it again if the creator is going to just keep remainspacing it himself.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt this film from having to have better referencing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 14:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ArcAngel
(talk) 23:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist to see if there is more support for Draftification or Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
acceptable as signed by their authors:
Reviewers tracked by Rotten Tomatoes are not automatically reliable for their reviews, while there is no consensus on whether their "Top Critics" are generally reliable.
The result was redirect to Adrienne Bailon-Houghton. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
I could not find evidence of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources. The Billboard source currently used in the article is solid, but one source does not justify a separate article, and I could not find evidence of further coverage outside of that single source. Aoba47 ( talk) 23:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:15, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability criteria failure. Lots of one sentence trivial mention in numerous CMJ magazines, and other mentions elsewhere like "Many emo bands of the late 90s signed to indie labels including Jade Tree Records, Saddle Creek, and Big Wheel Recreation." but sources that satisfy ORGDEPTH not found. Graywalls ( talk) 22:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
this is a label that made significant and lasting impacts on musical culturethen prove it. Provide widely circulated mainstream citation that corroborates the supposed significant and lasting impact on culture. As an example, PBS states in their own voice about Thomas Edison:
Edison invented or refined devices that made a profound impact on how people lived[1]. Now, let's see something of equal caliber crediting Big Wheel Recreation for making a profound impact on music culture. Graywalls ( talk) 00:57, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSCHOOL as it meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:ORG. Searches in English and Bengali found nothing but passing mentions and indiscriminate directory listings. Without significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources, should not be a stand alone article. Worldbruce ( talk) 21:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 22:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
As per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. All the sources are from March 2013 when the event happened. LibStar ( talk) 23:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:GNG. Could not find reliable, secondary source significant coverage. Only source cited on article that offers this is a primary source from UMass. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 22:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mossad. The previous AFD was closed as No consensus but there was a solid contingent of editors asking for a Merge/Redirect so I'm willing to close this discussion now even though there has been low participation. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Propose redirect and merge into Mossad. If you take out all the unsourced pop culture references, there are really only 3 sentences of well-sourced and additive content in this article. Would be better suited in the main Mossad article. AfD discussion was no consensus, with strong support for merging. Since then, the article has been winnowed down. Longhornsg ( talk) 21:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per criterion G4. Page was an exact copy of an article that was G4-deleted just two days ago. I've also deleted the two draft pages which were also exact copies. Creator is blocked along with their sock, Ncircle Entertainment ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), and the title will be blacklisted. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 21:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Repeatedly created in the exact same manner with zero improvement. First AFD ended up in a merge to another article be this user that has been deleted because it also failed WP:NCORP. Has been moved to AFC and declined several times. I will also nominate this title be salted. McMatter ( talk)/( contrib) 21:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 17:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted in both 2015 and 2020 before being recreated in 2021. I don't see any significant role or significant coverage since previous deletions. Roles are minor and the references are interviews, routine coverage, or unreliable sources. Would recommend salting if deleted. CNMall41 ( talk) 20:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 21:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Qatif conflict#Arab Spring protests 2011–12. Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:CFORK or perhaps a spinout of 2011–2012 Saudi Arabian protests. That page covers the subject, but the spinout is not required and the events in Qatif are not independently notable. The sources in the article are WP:PRIMARY being news reports, and descriptions of the events. There was indeed a series of clashes in Qatif, but these were all part of the 2011-2012 Saudi protests and there is no evidence in sources that the Qatif clashes were given exception coverage nor particular analysis outside of that. Secondary sources do not cover this subject outside of the larger Saudi Arabian protests subject. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is additional support for a Merge and, if so, to which target article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Primary sources may include newspaper articles, letters, diaries, interviews, laws, reports of government commissions, and many other types of documents."A contemporary newspaper report of an event is a primary source. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 18:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
most news stories are considered primary sources. There are cases where they can be secondary, but they involve historical perspective or later synthesis of other sources (often news articles themselves). An example is an article about a battle that has just happened (primary) versus a war retrospective years later that uses that frontline reporting as a source (secondary). Your average news article, such as those linked here, are clearly of the primary variety. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 16:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 20:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or ask at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON. Draftify for now. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 19:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to see if there is additional support for Draftifying from those advocating Delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least one cap for the Zimbabwe women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Since a PROD was removed without any reason given by an IP, we need to follow the AfD process. The biography covers a non-notable contestant in a non-notable pageant, Miss Exclusive. The article's single source is not a RS; see WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources which indicates world360news.com, which dubiously titles itself "Chhattisgarh News" aka chhattisgarh.news, is probably SPS. ☆ Bri ( talk) 18:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Secondary source significant coverage not found. Only sigcov is from the Harvard Crimson, a primary source as it's the school's official student newspaper. This is also primary. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 18:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Article has been greatly expanded since its AFD nomination, looking for editors to assess whether changes are enough to establish notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. The subject has earned three caps for the Luxembourg women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Redirect to List of Luxembourg women's international footballers. The subject has earned at least three caps for the Luxembourg women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 19:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. leaning Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Neologistic expanded WP:DICTDEF. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
Mark viking}} {
Talk}
10:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:32, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Category indicates it is an abandoned project so doesn't have any expectation of gaining any notability. Fails WP:GNG. Additionally, article was created by the creator of the topic. Perhaps a merger into another article to fulfill WP:ATD. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The article has been created on both the French and Arabic Wikipedia by the same user (Cross-wiki), who appears to have a potential conflict of interest as they may be affiliated with the company or have a vested interest. They have uploaded a high-resolution picture of the journalist, the article itself seems to lack objective and comprehensive content about the journalist. Instead, the focus appears to be primarily on their nomination as the head of the channel, rather than providing a well-rounded sources about their career or accomplishments. Riad Salih ( talk) 14:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I generally don't challenge opinions in an AFD discussion, but I don't think "no enough sources" is valid here. The sources might be passing mentions and not sufficient to establish GNG but there are quite a few present in this article. Relisting in hope of a more serious review of sources present in the article and others that might be present online.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability. He never played for the senior national team. only played for the youth level teams. yes he played for some pro clubs but that's not enough to makes him notable. also you rarely can find anything about him in English or even Persian sources. Sports2021 ( talk) 14:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. As we have all learned over the past year and a half, participation on a team isn't enough for a stand alone article on Wikipedia but coverage by secondary, independent sources that is required. If that doesn't exist, is there an appropriate Redirect target article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Creation of a redirect to an appropriate target is at editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Not really sure how to class this, a blog? An academic journal (as suggested by the infobox)? In any case, this is not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 13:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is No consensus now on what should become of this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 19:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Shippo (company). Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Company she founded already has an article on Wikipedia, but the references cited for the material in this article doesn’t show any significant coverage in her name, forbes 30-30 mentioned only, entrepreneur (an interview), BBC just another mention she probably passes General Notability but there’s no independent sources maybe too soon? Autograph ( talk) 12:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to assess changes in the article since it was nominated.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 18:59, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Not sure if this one passes WP:NORG. The article is completely promotional and really says very little. Checking for secondary sources finds some fluff PR pieces. Qcne (talk) 18:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
As Poimenlaon suggests on the talk page, this article appears to be a well-crafted hoax: Gerber, who is repeatedly cited, does not even mention a poet named Philodoppides. Neither do Callimachus frr. 439-40 or Maciver. The two important modern reference works ( Oxford Classical Dictionary and Brill's New Pauly) carry no hint of this supposed poet. Everything points to this article's being a hoax and as such it should be deleted. Modussiccandi ( talk) 18:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Former member of the hard rock band Burden Brothers but individually fails WP:NMUSIC and is not notable enough to have his own article. References all mention him a single time as a former member of said band and I could find no other sigcov. Sgubaldo ( talk) 16:48, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. SK1, withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 12:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass notability guidelines for academics - professional career is rather standard for any professor in the field. He does have a few books, though data on them is (to my cursory look) limited. Happy to be corrected by someone with more expertise in the field, but seemingly apt for deletion. A MINOTAUR ( talk) 15:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Large number of non-IS sources. WP:TNT candidate, though likely fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:37, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Not notable, never won a medal. InvadingInvader ( userpage, talk) 15:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a minor political fringe candidate, not
properly sourced as having any strong claim to permanent notability. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles on that basis per se -- the notability test at
WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates must either (a) have a valid claim of preexisting notability for other reasons independent of their candidacies (the
Cynthia Nixon test), or (b) show a credible reason why they should be seen as special cases of significantly greater and more enduring notability than other candidates (the
Christine O'Donnell test).
But the only real claim of significance on offer here is the quirkiness of his platform, which is not of enduring importance in and of itself (a lot of "oddball" candidates run on platforms that could be seen as weird), and the referencing isn't really cutting it in terms of getting him over
WP:GNG: four of the seven footnotes are just raw tables of election results (which aren't support for the notability of losing candidates at all), and two more are Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person (which are acceptable as supplementary sourcing for stray facts after GNG has already been covered off by third-party coverage, but are not in and of themselves bringers of the GNG as they aren't independent of the subject.) So there's only one footnote that represents a journalist writing about him in the third person, which isn't enough coverage to get him over the bar all by itself.
Bearcat (
talk) 13:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 14:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleted by ComplexRational after moving back to its original title, Chandni FC, in moving without leaving a redirect. Procedurally closing this AfD, as the article is deleted. (non-admin closure) Tartar Torte 19:33, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
I was going to tag this for WP:G4, but at this point it seems a bit controversial to do so as this page was already deleted via WP:G4 in July by ComplexRational after a nomination per myself, the deletion log is here. This page was located at Chandni FC until 20 August 2023, which would have at certain points made either Al Madeena Cherpulassery in its previous form from July or Chandni FC (but unsure which of the two) eligible for deletion due to WP:A10; however, there are no specific speedy deletion criteria here. There is a Draft:Al Madeena Cherpulassery which appears to be about the same topic as this article which was dratified right after the page was deleted via G4 in July. With all of that information out of the way, it seems that the issues about this article from the AfD back in 2022 are still an issue. This team does not appear to pass WP:GNG. It seems that given some of the issues with indeffed/socked participants in the previous AfD pointed out by others since the close of the previous AfD to regain consensus on this article. Tartar Torte 13:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Mayor of a small municipality in Denmark with a population of ~26,000. Does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. This realistically should have been a speedy keep under criterion #1, as "I am losing a content dispute" is not a rationale for deletion. But certainly as it stands, the result here is clearly that this subject is notable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This article is often being used as an attack page on "Vishwananda", which a disrespectful way to address Paramahamsa Vishwananda. Many of the citations are linked to tabloid-like websites and websites that have a personal bias towards a Hindu Guru (e.g. Evangelical Church in Germany). I have been trying to edit this article by being objective, hence I have not removed the sexual allegations about "Vishwananda", but I have tried added factual events, such as him being the first person born outside of India to be initiated as a "Mahamandaleshwar" and have linked to the news article about this. The other editors, namely Hanumandas, have undone all the objective facts about this due to their own motive of attack. The tone of the article is also very questionable, specifically, those of Hanumandas. I can add more clarification if necessary and more information to state my case if needed. Shiva is Love ( talk) 12:51, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:05, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 ( talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America 1000 16:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
non-notable soft drink from sweden, cannot find sources that is unrelated to the british version — Karnataka talk 12:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eugene Tssui#Proposals and city planning projects. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 23:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for sources since 2010, and still relies on a single blog post and one SPS page; does not satisfy WP:GNG. François Robere ( talk) 12:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Has been tagged for sources since 2017, and still unsourced. François Robere ( talk) 12:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
SourcesAll universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy the notability guidelines for organizations, the general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES)
The article notes from Google Translate: "In fact, Yucai High School has already established its status as a "famous school for curriculum reform" across the country. As early as 2004, Yucai became one of the two "National Curriculum Reform Model Schools of the Ministry of Education" in Shenzhen, and made a lot of explorations in curriculum reconstruction and classroom reform. For example, in 2004, the school proposed the education model of "three teachers in one" (the three teachers refer to the teacher, class teacher and tutor), and then continued to innovate, and successively implemented the off-campus brain bank plan, independent study plan, primary school teacher plan, "excellent teachers""
The article notes from Google Translate: "Yucai High School, it is one of the earliest schools in the special zone after the establishment of the Shenzhen special zone; it is a school that "dare to be the first" founded by Mr. Yuan Geng, a pioneer of reform and a pioneer of the special zone; The birthplace of "Flower Season and Rainy Season" and the filming location of the film of the same name; it is the first school in the country to offer mental health courses and adolescent sex education courses; the first school in the country to operate a literature club (Chunyun website) on the Internet; It is also the network base school of the National Chinese Campus Literature Alliance, the first overseas Chinese training base school for high schools; the first school in the country to introduce Hong Kong version of English textbooks into the classroom; the first school to introduce "Western Great Originals""
The result was delete. Complex/ Rational 15:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Article about non-notable physicist created by an WP:SPA. Mostly expounds his crackpot theories and lists his fringe publications. Reference 5 looked at first sight to give him a sliver of notability, but it turns out its a newspaper column written by himself. Tercer ( talk) 12:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of the Month. Spartaz Humbug! 04:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This list has been unsourced for over 10 years, and I see no hope of it ever becoming appropriately-sourced without extensive original research. There is significant concern that this list violates WP:BLP as well; see WP:DEL-REASON 7 and 9.
Related lists for other decades have been redirected to List of Playboy Playmates of the Month, which seems like a good solution to me. The exception to that is List of people in Playboy 1970–1979, where the BLAR was reverted (just as it was here). Consider this a WP:BUNDLE nom, as the exact same concerns apply. Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 11:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 12:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Locally-known educator with no substantial publications or national awards; does not satisfy WP:NACADEMIC. François Robere ( talk) 09:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Maybe next time check the sources before you nominate the article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND. Case of WP:PROMO / WP:ADMASQ. Reference are routine business news. scope_creep Talk 09:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR applies. ✗ plicit 12:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:32, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Foreign relations of Gagauzia. Not wedded to merge target but there is consensus this isn't better off as a standalone article. Spartaz Humbug! 04:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Relations articles between sovereign states and subnational regions are somewhat uncommon, but could be viable, given good references. This, however, seems like a WP:COATRACK WP:POV article for grievances about Moldovan policy towards Gagauzia, where the actual substance on relations with Turkey is razor thin. Geschichte ( talk) 16:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 16:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. As noted by nom, the previous AFD was for a different subject, so soft deletion can be applied here. ✗ plicit 12:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable rugby league player. Fails WP:GNG (previous AFD was for another Ben Gray). J Mo 101 ( talk) 17:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 17:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛
𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 08:53, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus is that the topic is notable, but that significant areas of the article in its current state fail WP:V and should be removed. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced WP:BLP. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Motionless in White. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable outside the band. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep Talk 07:35, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. ✗ plicit 12:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
A very short-lived title where neither the baronetcy nor the sole baronet seem to have done anything noteworthy, they just existed, and are noted as such in a few very exhaustive lists of British nobility. 90% of the article is not about the baronet or the baronetcy, but about their extended family. Perhaps a redirect to a list of 17th c. baronetcies or some such would be the best here, and if no good target is found then deletion. Fram ( talk) 07:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. If the article creator wants to work on this article in Draft space, let me know or request this at WP:REFUND. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability requirements; WP:NCORP. Sources rely on press releases masquerading as legitimate sources. Nevertheless, I am willing to withdraw the nomination if any enhancements are made to the article per the guidelines outlined in WP:HEY. RPSkokie ( talk) 06:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
References
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Adams political family#Members. ✗ plicit 06:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Notability isn't inherited. Probably best to just redirect to Adams political family#Members. Clarityfiend ( talk) 06:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
A lot of databases come up to clutter results, so it is hard to tell if I missed anything, but only one article seems to exist about him, which is just a short interview. Seems non-notable. DemonDays64 ( talk• contribs) 06:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 06:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tally Hall. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
"Andrew Horowitz" musician
and Andrew Horowitz Tally Hall
both have very few results on Google search. There is only one profile specifically about him
[50]. Nothing else appears to come up focusing on him. Definitely fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMUSICIAN imo.
DemonDays64 (
talk•
contribs) 05:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete Tangential connections to notable artists fails under NOTINHERITED. Delete based on a lack of RS recognition. Largely written and maintained by 2 SPA accounts and unregistered IP addresses, it seems suspiciously self-promotional by the subject himself.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 05:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:49, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least three caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:37, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least four caps for the Liechtenstein women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 05:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 05:50, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
a WP:BIASed selection of purported war crimes conducted largely by the West. The "war crimes" were either not War crimes at the relevant time or were conducted by countries that were not signatories to the relevant international convention(s). This selective retrospective application is non-encyclopaedic and does not belong here. We already have a detailed page on War crimes and specific pages for various events and countries, where all relevant events should be listed. Mztourist ( talk) 04:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
2- I agree that events have a specific page and specific pages and I tried to list all of these on one page. We can change the name of the article to The list of uses of unconventional weapons. M1nhm ( talk) 11:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 04:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "你看過Wikipedia(維基百科)嗎? 12月14日下午政大原民中心邀請到清大物理學系陳柏中副教授、大漢技術學院資訊管理學系楊允言助理教授和台東大學華語文學系張學謙副教授, 分享Wikipedia (維基百科) 台語版本的建置與經營經過, 這是第一次從資訊科學、語言社會學、資訊管理學跨領 ... 陳柏中首先提到,2003年他在美國唸書就參與維基百科的繁體中文與簡體中文之爭,到最後自力更 ... 生成立「Holopedia」的過程,他們從三人創始元老團隊草創爭取Wikipedia中Holo話成為獨立語言的故事。除了努力寫詞條叩關,還面臨技術面的問題與挑戰,最後是還有來自懂網路但不懂母語的寫手,以及其他台語運動低度結合等社群動員面的問題,但是在Holo話以白話字首先扣關維基百科成功後,目前維基百科漢語系下已有粵語、贛語、吳語、文言、客家話、閩東語和潮洲話等8個版本。"
From Google Translate: "Have you read Wikipedia (Wikipedia)? On the afternoon of December 14, the Indigenous Peoples Center of National Chengchi University invited Associate Professor Chen Baizhong, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Assistant Professor Yang Yunyan, Department of Information Management, Dahan Institute of Technology, and Associate Professor Zhang Xueqian, Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Taitung University to share about Wikipedia, the establishment and operation of the Taiwanese version [Holopedia]. This is the first time that information science, linguistic sociology, and information management have crossed fields... Chen Baizhong first mentioned that he participated in Wikipedia in 2003 when he was studying in the United States. The struggle between Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, and finally the process of establishing "Holopedia" by self-reliance. They started from the three-person founding veteran team to strive for the Holo language in Wikipedia to become an independent language. In addition to working hard to write entries, there are also technical problems and challenges. Finally, there are writers who understand the Internet but do not understand their mother tongue, and other community mobilization problems such as low integration of Taiwanese language movements, but after the Holo dialect was first linked to Wikipedia with vernacular characters, Wikipedia currently has 8 versions under the Chinese department, including Cantonese, Gan, Wu, Classical, Hakka, Hokkien and Teochew."
The book notes: "Significantly, the second strongest Sinitic language, comprising more than 200,000 articles, is identified as Bân-lâm-gú/Hō-ló-oē, which includes Taiwanese. Even more importantly, since the overwhelming majority of articles are written entirely in the Roman alphabet, the Bân-lâm-gú Wikipedia (also known as Holopedia) is the only Sinitic Wikipedia with virtually no Chinese characters. Obviously, this seems to confirm my previous impression that advocates of an alphabetic Taiwanese orthography have been most active in spreading their aspired standard. Figure 12.1 shows the beginning of the entry ‘Republic of China’ on Holopedia. ... If we take the Holopedia not only as a sign of the vitality of alphabetically written Taiwanese, it turns out that today, like 20 years ago, governmental and non-governmental language planners still do not pull together, in terms of both intensity and substance. It has to be emphasised that individual non-governmental agency in language planning cannot be limited to the Holopedia community."
The book notes: "台文人士在網路商業公司未大量開設類似服務之前,就開始試驗 blog 跟 wiki。在2003 年「暗光鳥ê厝」開始試寫個人 blog( http://lomaji.com/oldblog)。 同時,陳柏中試驗經營「台語文 Weblog 中心」( http://weblog.holopedia.org),軟體則使用時興的 Movable Type。這提供免費的blog 帳號空間給有興趣寫台語文的人士書寫用,最熱鬧之時會吸引數十人。同 (2003) 年,戴凱序跟陳 柏中兩人規劃、設立 Holopedia.net。Holopedia 是一個用wiki技術編寫百科全 書的數位事工,試驗一年後遷移到相同性質的 Wikipedia,變成其台文版(http:// nan.wikipedia.org),到2008年2月已累計有兩千九百多篇文章。"
From Google Translate: "Taiwanese people began to experiment with blogs and wikis before Internet business companies opened a large number of similar services. In 2003, "Dark Light Bird ê Cuo" began to try to write a personal blog ( http://lomaji.com/oldblog). At the same time, Chen Bozhong tried to operate the "Taiwanese Weblog Center" ( http://weblog.holopedia.org), and the software used the fashionable Movable Type. This provides free blog account space for those who are interested in writing Taiwanese language, and it will attract dozens of people at the most lively time. In the same year (2003), Dai Kaixu and Chen Baizhong planned and established Holopedia.net. Holopedia is a digital ministry that uses wiki technology to write encyclopedias. After a year of experimentation, it migrated to Wikipedia of the same nature and became its Taiwanese version ( http://nan.wikipedia.org). By February 2008, it had accumulated There are more than 2,900 articles."
The book notes: "二、台語維基百科: 台語線頂百科全書是2003 年設立,叫做 Holopedia , 2004 年加入維基百科 (Wikipedia) ,到 2013 年 12 月,已經有 11,000 外篇詞條,是用 POJ 寫。當初用POJ 用漢字寫,是經過真濟討論得著結果,主要是若用漢字寫,寫法可能會真無一致。網址 " http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/"。因為是維基百科一部分若是所看這个詞條有其它語言版本,詞條頁面倒爿有選項 ,會使直接連結去語言版本。"
From Google Translate: "2. Taiwanese Wikipedia: The Taiwanese online top encyclopedia was established in 2003, called Holopedia, and joined Wikipedia in 2004. By December 2013, there were already 11,000 foreign entries written in POJ. At the beginning, POJ was written in Chinese characters, which was the result of Zhenji's discussion. The main reason is that if it is written in Chinese characters, the writing method may not be consistent. URL " http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/". Because it is part of Wikipedia, if the entry you are looking at has other language versions, there is an option on the entry page, which will directly link to the language version."
The doctoral dissertation notes: "(b) Taiwanese Wikipedia: Taiwanese Wikipedia (aka Holopedia), which was established in 2003 and included in Wikipedia in 2004, could also be considered as a POJ corpus. There are more than 4,000 articles so far (Wikimedia Foundation, 2004)."
The article notes: "例如: 中文維基百科全書 http://zh.wikipedia.org/、閩南語維基百科 http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/。中文維基百科可做線上繁簡體轉換,解決了兩岸華人輸入和閱讀的問題。除了中文之外,還有使用拼音的閩南語維基百科哦!除了維基百科全書以外, ..."
From Google Translate: "For example: Chinese Wikipedia http://zh.wikipedia.org/, Hokkien Wikipedia http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/. Chinese Wikipedia can do online traditional and simplified conversion, which solves the input and reading problems of Chinese on both sides of the strait. In addition to Chinese, there is also a Hokkien Wikipedia that uses pinyin! In addition to Wikipedia, ..."
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. ✗ plicit 06:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable local business that do not satisfy WP:NCORP. Graywalls ( talk) 04:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 04:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:46, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only one primary source. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Wikipedias. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 06:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unnotable wiki citing only primary sources. That is to say Wikipedia/other Wikimedia projects.
Perhaps this is also considered circular referencing? QuickQuokka [ talk • contribs 03:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The subject has earned at least two caps for the Papua New Guinea women's national football team. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage from third-party sources, failing WP:GNG. JTtheOG ( talk) 02:40, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Organization for the Support of Democratic Movement in Taiwan. ✗ plicit 03:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
The source 1 is worldcat website, source 2 merely mentioned the magazine's name, source 3 is an interview with the magazine editor, source 4 is a list showcasing the magazine itself, source 5 is a database on a university webpage, and sources 6-8 are all websites of the magazine publisher. In summary, the article lacks reliable third-party sources for an effective introduction. 日期20220626 ( talk) 02:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
After some thought, despite this being a station in Los Angeles, one of the biggest television markets in the US, I cannot see how this low-power station — a former TBN relay turned into another DTV America/HC2/Innovate operation — actually meets the GNG. It appears to have only ever really been a repeater of other networks or stations, with neither the adequate sourcing nor any sort of local content or coverage that would get it anywhere near actual notability; the article also tends to attract unsourced edits of dubious quality, another reason why our old overpresumption of "notability" (based on an essay, which seemed to have these all-diginet stations slip through the cracks pre-2021, rather than GNG) was a bit of an error in hindsight. (This is another station that was part of the failed bulk nomination of HC2/Innovate station articles that intermingled stations like this one with facilities that have slightly more substantial histories; the history here isn't quite as threadbare as some of the newer DTV America stations that went from application to license surrender in about a decade, but it isn't much better.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting subject to a previous AFD,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K04QR-D so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 02:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of The Book of Boba Fett characters. Merge is a common outcome from AFD Spartaz Humbug! 04:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Garsa Fwip is an extremely minor character whose reception consists of only three sources, two of which are simple lists. I'm not even sure why she has a page to begin with. Unnamed anon ( talk) 01:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is currently no consensus and certainly no consensus to Delete. I encourage the nominator,
User:Unnamed anon to refrain from commenting on every remark in this AFD discussion or you could be blocked from participating in this discussion due to bludgeoning. You've made your nomination and views known, you don't need to counter every opinion that disagrees with your own. It certainly won't convince anyone to agree with your perspective.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 02:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NJUDGE as a failed judicial nominee. Perhaps redirect to Donald Trump judicial appointment controversies? Let'srun ( talk) 01:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Gael Baudino. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
A bit of a large one - I'm wondering if *any* of these books as well as this "series" page should have pages. From what I can tell this is a minor fantasy series with very little engagement over time. Every book as well as the "series" page cites the same 2 references, both of which come from the same niche journal. Most all content on these pages is summarizing plot events rather than denoting any particular notability of the works. While not a formal metric, searching the books today results in "fan groups" of <100 people, suggesting the books also don't carry much widespread consumer notability.
If the consensus is to delete - I am unclear on if an XfD must be made for each book, as it seems to be an "all or nothing" situation. A MINOTAUR ( talk) 16:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on redirecting to
Gael Baudino?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 01:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Sirius XM Radio channels#Former channels. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Subject lacks any secondary sources here to meet the WP:GNG, and there doesn't appear to be much elsewhere. Perhaps redirect this to List of Sirius XM Radio channels? Let'srun ( talk) 01:11, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 02:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This subject does not meet WP:GNG or any subject specific notability criteria. Let'srun ( talk) 01:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 01:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Could not find significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Hey man im josh ( talk) 20:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Taking Out The Trash (
talk) 15:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
international [or] national [...] office? ( WP:NPOL) Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 20:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete – Ambassadors are inherently un-notable. sarcasm Actualcpscm scrutinize, talk 16:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notabilityand that is all that has been demonstrated so far. SportingFlyer T· C 12:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I debated on whether to relist this or close it as a keep and I chose to relist it. We're on the keep side of things right now but it's really a weak keep in my opinion. Relisting so hopefully another week sparks a good round of discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Dusti
*Let's talk!* 00:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Unreferenced, stat-only page about a minor event. The best source I found is [54], but WP:NOTNEWS, WP:NEVENT, etc. Is this rescuable? Or merge/redirectable? Note: I am nominating this here after a request at pl wikipedia's AfD at pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2023:08:19:Puchar Chicago 1992, where a number of similar weak articles were nominated, and several have English Wikipedia entries (but very poor, as the one seen herel the two others that may merit discussion on English Wikipedia are Umbro Cup and 1985 Azteca 2000 Tournament). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion include an apparent breach of the biographies of living persons policy, and because this article appears to be contrary to the What Wikipedia is not policy that discourages scandal mongering, so should also be excluded according to the second prong of the notability guideline.
This article was created on 22 December 2022 [55], after the subject began to receive Ottawa-based coverage related to a variety of serious misconduct allegations, including allegations described in an article source headline in terms that can be commonly understood as allegations of criminal conduct. An Ontario-based legal industry publication also reported on allegations in December 2022. Coverage of allegations appears to have begun in November 2022.
This article was brought to AfD on 18 February 2023, and NAC-closed as keep on 4 March 2023 by a now-blocked sock. Since then, the article subject has been criminally charged.
I have tried to find reliable sources to help establish this subject was well-known before and/or independent of 'lawyer is subject to bar disciplinary investigation and license suspension,' 'lawyer is accused of serious misconduct,' 'lawyer is facing criminal charges,' and 'lawyer is relatedly getting sued in a civil action.' With an assist from the prior AfD and article, I have found:
pre-November 2022 sources
|
---|
|
Based on available sources, compliance with WP:BLPSTYLE and WP:BLPBALANCE does not appear possible at this time - specifically writing a biography that is not primarily based on recent coverage related to allegations, investigations, and criminal charges. Since coverage of the allegations began, there are some brief mentions in Ottawa news about his past Freedom Convoy-related social media activity, e.g.
post-November 2022 sources
|
---|
|
Basic biographical and career information also appears to be limited, with the Ottawa Citizen mentioning on 2 Feb 2023 "Born in 1983, Bowie was licensed in 2015 and has worked as a sole practitioner since 2020 in Ottawa" and the general location of his residence. If his own representations about his media activity are included, he seems to have made some appearances in news media to offer comment on Freedom Convoy court proceedings in 2022, but there do not appear to be sources describing him as a well-known news commentator or pundit.
According to more recent sources, he "became known on Twitter"/"known for garnering Twitter followers"/"rose to prominence on social media by chronicling the court appearances of various 'Freedom Convoy' organizers" in 2022, but does not appear to have received contemporary, independent, reliable, in-depth coverage of this. I think WP:BASIC/ WP:GNG notability would not be supported based on what appears to otherwise be available about his career, commentary, and social media activity, and this limited available coverage does not offer a lot to help develop a balanced biography.
In advance of this AfD, I removed content from the article based on WP:BLP policy. Sources remaining in the article are primarily coverage of allegations. So I am bringing this article here for further discussion, because notability does not appear to be well-supported, and it appears BLP policy further supports deletion of this article at this time. Beccaynr ( talk) 00:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page. The votes to keep at the first AFD were not plentiful, but they were unanimous, User:Loewstisch pointed out how WP:GNG was met and I made the same argument citing news from 2020, 2022 and 2023:
heard through the grapevine. The article is cited. We should not delete content just because the content is scandalous if it is reported in reliable sources. See Category:Scandals for the many dozens of article specifically on scandals.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 ( talk) 00:18, 21 August 2023 (UTC)