Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Hi Arms & Hearts,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 12:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I have semi-protected this talk page for 3d to limit future disruption. Please let me know on my talk page if you would like this semi-protection removed, or if you have recurring issues afterward (and I need to protect it for longer). Best, Spencer T• C 12:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I hope all is well with you. I am writing as I received a message from you about the edits made to my page. There is a long history regarding my page, but to surmise, someone, whom I do not know, created the page. There were lots of erroneous information and I worked with a Wiki writer to help alleviate some of the misinformation. You can see the transcript of our conversation. I recently made some recommendations to update the article. Is it possible to have the newly edited material added to the page? I only want to make sure that the information on the page is accurate and not as a self promotion but updated accurate information
Thank you Terrance Dean 20:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrancedean37212 ( talk • contribs)
I appreciate the response, and have viewed the section on "Conflict of Interest." I do understand the guidelines regarding making edits to one's own page, family, friends, or someone I know personally. I would only like to recommend cleaning up the page, making it more editorially readable, and to provide accurate updated information. One source, regarding my Ph.D., and research work can be found here: https://denison.edu/people/terrance-dean
I know you are extremely busy, and work tirelessly on managing pages, and ensuring updates regarding pages are following the guidelines of Wikipedia.
Again, I only wanted to edit the page to be more readable, accessible, and accurate.
Thank you for your time and patience. I look forward to your review of my recommendations.
Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrancedean37212 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
So let me tell you why i had added it in but at the same time why later on i had removed it as part of Protest against Trump. The first reason is one it is debateable as is it part of it or not. I think it's somewhat part of the Anti Trump Protest but it did not started like that. It's starts out as a anti racial and anti police brutality protest but it slowly becoming extreme as far left and black lives matter movement starts to join in and started to do riots in the country. It gets worse as far rights white supremacy and Donald Trump starts to join in on the opposite side. This gets to point when i put in the protest in it as part of the Anti Trump Protest as the protest gets worse. But then i was thinking about removed it not only for that reason but also the second reason. It's not well made it's just a short sentense i made due to being rushed just before my time on the PC is going to end. So yeah i had removed it for both reasons you can re added it in if you like but for me i think its best to do nothing and let you think about it. 15:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC) CrusaderToonamiUK ( talk)
Hi, you edited my addition to Black Bloc. Here is what your looking for? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/style/antifa-fashion.html. They confirm why ANTIFA dresses "Black Bloc". I believe this establish the truth and you correctness is anticipated (something you previously believed, suspected, or feared to not be the case). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casey92 ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I see you removed the Ngo incident. Do you think the same thing should be done for Willem van Spronsen? Because there was no consensus for that either as far as I am aware, so I do not know whether you forgot to remove it or if you believe it can stay. It currently says this:
In July 2019, 69-year-old Willem van Spronsen staged a predawn lone-wolf attack on the ICE's Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington. After hurling incendiary devices in an attempt to set fire to a commercial-size propane tank at the facility and aiming his homemade unregistered " ghost" AR-15 style rifle at first responders, he was shot dead by police. [1] The Tacoma Police Department said Van Spronsen's possible motives included his association with antifa and was reviewing his manifesto [2] in which he wrote "I am antifa". [3] Calling him a "good friend and comrade", Seattle Antifascist Action proclaimed Van Spronsen "a martyr who gave his life to the struggle against fascism". [3]
Other recent additions that may be worth verifying and discussing could be these:
In June 2020, conservative journalist Andy Ngo, whom Rolling Stone has described as a right-wing "provocateur" [1] and Vox called a "far-right sympathizer" who doxed at least one antifa activist by publishing her full name, [2] sued antifa seeking $900,000 in damages for assault and emotional distress and an injunction to prevent further harassment. The lawsuit, filed on Ngo's behalf by his attorney Harmeet Dhillon, cites Rose City Antifa, five other named defendants and additional unknown assailants. It stems from multiple alleged attacks on Ngo in Portland during 2019 and accuses Rose City Antifa in particular of a "pattern of racketeering activities". [3]
On June 5, 2020, three known members of a local antifa group were arrested for looting, burglarizing, and damaging property at a Target retail store in Austin, Texas six days earlier. [1] [2]
Let me know what you think.
Finally, what do you think of
this revert (RV, sources don't make connection to antifa or the subject of the section so basically synth/OR
) of
my edit (from Tucker Carlson (whose show has been described by the Anti-Defamation League[31] and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)[32] as well as news outlets such as Business Insider, CNN, GQ and Vox as promoting and echoing white supremacist discourse.[33][34][35][36]
)? I thought it was relevant and helpful for context. In all other cases, we describe what reliable sources say about those involved with antifa. Maybe not with those sources and this wording, but I believe it could be worth adding or mentioning somehow.
Thanks for your time.-- Davide King ( talk) 13:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
provide context for the incident(as you wrote) which I hope you can rework in the main body with those sources which relate to antifa and are not WP:SYNTH.-- Davide King ( talk) 17:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
legitimate response) and Chomsky (
a major gift to the right). I agree it is a shame to elide that discussion, so maybe a better wording could be used. That would really be useful; this article truly need more books and academic studies and research, less news sources written by non-experts, etc.
The Trump administration blamed what it called the radical left, naming antifa, a contraction of the word "anti-fascist" that has come to be associated with a diffuse movement of left-wing protesters who engage in more aggressive techniques like vandalism.So there is not even consistency in the use of far-left and in other words individuals within antifa are described as generally holding left-wing to far-left views, but the only thing certain is that antifa is anti-fascist.
Hey Arms and Hearts. Hope you're well. I'm reaching out to people who have edited [[South Wales East (Senedd Cymru electoral region)] and, in particular, people who know how to edit the table of list members. The Conservative Senedd member Mohammed Asghar has died and having tried to just enter "Vacant" underneath his name, I've got lost in a mathematical haze of rowspan=x rowspan=z rowspan=q confusion. I just can't for the life of me work out which rowspans and column spans and other numbers I have to increase by 1 to add the word "vacant" underneath his name. Could you either help or do this for me please? I had the same problems with European Parliament regions, I just get brain freeze whenever I try to work out what to do with rowspan numbers and I'm too scared to just go ahead and wish for the best!
Thanks for any assistance :) I'll post a version of this message on a few other editors pages too just in case there's someone else about. Speak soon doktorb words deeds 18:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
It appears nobody is engaging in communication in regards to why the video should be removed. Please can you engage in the talk section before you undo my revert.
Many thanks, just trying get a more balanced page here! It seems ever so one sided! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gu64rk g ( talk • contribs) 15:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Arms & Hearts,
Hope you are well. If you'll oblige my reaching out, I'm a student doing some research for a summer internship related to improving content safety online. The company I'm interning with is trying to keep the web free of misinformation. We are hoping to learn from dedicated Wikipedia editors about their motivations to spend time doing editing work online (so that we can motivate others to do the same on other platforms). I saw that you are fairly active with edits; would you be willing to chat with me about your work for about ~20 min one day? If you prefer I can give you my questions in writing, too.
Thanks for considering!
LailaAtTrustLab ( talk) 18:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Mark Duggan was lawfully killed - the information is in the article. Read it. Sweet6970 ( talk) 11:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
A quote from the RfC page: ‘Before using the RfC process to get opinions from outside editors, it's often faster and more effective to thoroughly discuss the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. Editors are normally expected to make a reasonable attempt at working out their disputes before seeking help from others. ‘ Why do you decline to discuss this matter on the Talk page? Sweet6970 ( talk) 11:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Done per request, please fix any links to the article and do any other post move cleanups. Best regards Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 21:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Watkins (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Watkins (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P-K3 ( talk) 17:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Watkins (politician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Watkins (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Thank you for your message. The reason for calling them American is the categories "from Los Angeles" and "from Athens, Georgia". I know that such categories often include people who have gone there to live and are really from some unidentified place. I have no objection if "American" is deleted.-- Johnsoniensis ( talk) 19:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your post at Talk:Daily Mail will go nowhere. Just as all previous well argued and factual complaints registered there have gone nowhere. Some are still visible on that very page. Lots more have been purposefully removed by Administrators for their potential to expose the truth. That truth being, the vast majority of Wikipedia editors are all in on the idea that it is Wikipedia's mission to be as biased as possible against their political enemies, the Mail being the perfect target, as the most widely read and most right wing newspaper in Britain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChinaDaniel ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, For avoidance of doubt, you might want to update your comment on Talk:Demonstrations_in_support_of_Donald_Trump#Discussion_about_a_merge_into_this_article since it looks like there is support for your proposal. Cheers, Albertaont ( talk) 20:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw this, but I declined your request to block UnguidedEmperor
[1]. See the diff for the reasoning. I would also like to point out that saying "...if you're able, try to write edit summaries that make sense"
[2] towards UnguidedEmperor can be construed as uncivil. Text based communication has its limits, and the phrasing you used could easily be misinterpreted. Thanks, --
Hammersoft (
talk) 21:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
I asked Editor Alex2021 to revert his edits as he works for them but I see although he's declared on the talk page he hasn't done that. I was going to but you've edited since. Doug Weller talk 16:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me Why did you remove it!!!!! Ngyk198 ( talk) 10:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
How can the protestors be considered peaceful, when in the same opening paragraph it says "Ashburton House (the church's parish house), which had been damaged by a fire [arson] during protests the night before"? Why not just say protestors, not peaceful, not violent, just protestors. Teh 14:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I see all you do with your life is camp wikipedia articles to ensure everything has a maximally leftist slant. Your parents must be very proud. 207.32.162.22 ( talk) 17:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Nice work. Feel free to have at it in all the other UK police force articles, as I have on a lot of the fire service articles. I'll happily support your efforts to remove indiscriminate unencyclopaeidic guff. 10mmsocket ( talk) 20:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
If you fancy a bit of banality trimming - this whole section West_Yorkshire_Police#Former_Divisions. I think it needs deleting completely, or reducing to just a couple of paragraphs. The tables & map are way too detailed for former structures. -- 10mmsocket ( talk) 10:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Arms & Hearts, thank you for your message. I think you made a mistake. I can add reliable sources to confirm informations presented. As for the list of photographie series I don’t understand how it can be identified as copyright infringment? I’m going to read the rules on how to write about living people to help me, but if it could be possible to give me acces to my text back it would be very helpfull. Clotse ( talk) 07:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
You "welcomed" me yesterday after I made an edit without logging in. Thanks for respecting IP editors! :) SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Organisation and structure of the Metropolitan Police - Have you seen this? It's horrendous. Fancy a bit of a cleanup / merger into the main article? 10mmsocket ( talk) 15:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
If you think the gallery in WMP is pointless (which I fully support) then check out List of police stations in the West Midlands. I PROD'ed it and was told not to be stupid. Definitely worthy of an AfD as utterly pointless, especially as no other such article exists for police and fire stations in the UK. 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You welcomed a user I already welcomed. Don't know if you meant to do this or not but I just wanted to make sure you knew ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not wholesale revert copyright violation removals like you did at George Floyd protests in Portland. Close paraphrasing (or close para) is still one, please see WP:Close paraphrasing for more information, and WP:Contributor copyright investigations/Albertaont for why I removed the content I did. I've rewritten it like you've asked, but I know very little about this topic and would ask that you ask someone who at least is familiar with the details from hereon out. Sennecaster ( Chat) 02:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
I removed an unverifiable claim. The "source", a free online news article, does not state where exactly it got this information from, how, or prove in any way that it was actually said ("encrypted social media channels"). Moreover, it is gossip. Someone's "Personal Life", should be more than antagonistic gossip. Why are these random, anonymous views so notable that they make up the final line of, essentially, her mini autobiography? I could have removed a lot more. I hope you set ideology aside before you attempt to undo it again.
In a more general view, "Personal Life" sections on less notable individuals should be a basic set of facts (birthplace etc.) or done away with entirely.
Wikipedia should be neutral. I don't expect that ever to be the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LosingBattle ( talk • contribs) 22:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no suggestion in the article that she has ever left the USA. Musicians from Athens, Georgia are clearly American. Rathfelder ( talk) 19:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
how about we just remove Category:Musicians from Athens, Georgia?If you don't respond I'll probably just go ahead and do it and we can leave this there. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 16:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
I was going to revert or tag your addition to City of London police as having undue weight. But then I see your user page that your response would be. And guess what, I get it. Thanks to you I'm now a fellow DGAFfer. Thanks for introducing me to a way to express my Wikiattitude. I don't set out to upset people, but DGAF when I do. Your contribution may have been a bit long in words, but it was well-sourced, new information to me, and interesting to read, so why should I GAF about whether it stays or goes? TBH I think it now shows perhaps the article doesn't have enough of these sort of things. And your response to this post? DILLIGAF! 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you're absolutely right. That redirect was completely wrong. I corrected it . Can you check ? Regards, Filiep ( talk) 16:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Arms & Hearts. It seems you have inadevertently put all the RfDs created before yours in a Template:Collapse. Could you fix this or ask an admin to fix this? Veverve ( talk) 15:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Yes, a FB page has usually no outside source, but 5k users are reliable and significant source. The fact that kiwi.com has disgusting business behaviors are good reasons to make this public. Peteruetz ( talk) 01:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021 United States Capitol attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 17:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
On 6 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sophie Freud, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Please join the discussion at Talk:Swash regarding the brand's ownership. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 00:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I replied at Talk:Tina Peters. I didn't want to explain this there, but i am prevented by an editing restriction from putting an article directly into mainspace. If it were up to me I would put a very short innocuous article that would have no contoversy or BLP problems in place right now. Going through AFC, it is effectively required that an article has to be longer and more complete, and to address and deal in a balanced way with any controversy or BLP issues that i would rather avoid for now. I'm just explaining i cannot immediately respond as you might wish/expect to your pressure.
Right now I would prefer, in order:
Sincerely, Doncram ( talk) 17:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I created the category and support your proposed change, so I don't think the discussion is necessary, you have my consensus. CT55555( talk) 18:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Stop deleting the compilations of Against All Authority, a notable punk band from the 1990s that is still active. They are notable releases and I will file for a page lock if you don't stop deleting almost 5,000 characters off this wiki page. Whatever grief you have against the band will need to be saved for off of an information website. There are countless, literally tens of thousands, of bands with their compilation appearances on their wikipedia. I understand you are a frustrated musician but you need to leave other musicians' public information alone. 2600:1700:8140:29C0:8033:6C89:E253:CE4E ( talk) 22:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The redirect LGBT activists has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 18 § LGBT activists until a consensus is reached. user:A smart kitten meow 10:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Hi Arms & Hearts,
I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 12:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I have semi-protected this talk page for 3d to limit future disruption. Please let me know on my talk page if you would like this semi-protection removed, or if you have recurring issues afterward (and I need to protect it for longer). Best, Spencer T• C 12:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I hope all is well with you. I am writing as I received a message from you about the edits made to my page. There is a long history regarding my page, but to surmise, someone, whom I do not know, created the page. There were lots of erroneous information and I worked with a Wiki writer to help alleviate some of the misinformation. You can see the transcript of our conversation. I recently made some recommendations to update the article. Is it possible to have the newly edited material added to the page? I only want to make sure that the information on the page is accurate and not as a self promotion but updated accurate information
Thank you Terrance Dean 20:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrancedean37212 ( talk • contribs)
I appreciate the response, and have viewed the section on "Conflict of Interest." I do understand the guidelines regarding making edits to one's own page, family, friends, or someone I know personally. I would only like to recommend cleaning up the page, making it more editorially readable, and to provide accurate updated information. One source, regarding my Ph.D., and research work can be found here: https://denison.edu/people/terrance-dean
I know you are extremely busy, and work tirelessly on managing pages, and ensuring updates regarding pages are following the guidelines of Wikipedia.
Again, I only wanted to edit the page to be more readable, accessible, and accurate.
Thank you for your time and patience. I look forward to your review of my recommendations.
Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrancedean37212 ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
So let me tell you why i had added it in but at the same time why later on i had removed it as part of Protest against Trump. The first reason is one it is debateable as is it part of it or not. I think it's somewhat part of the Anti Trump Protest but it did not started like that. It's starts out as a anti racial and anti police brutality protest but it slowly becoming extreme as far left and black lives matter movement starts to join in and started to do riots in the country. It gets worse as far rights white supremacy and Donald Trump starts to join in on the opposite side. This gets to point when i put in the protest in it as part of the Anti Trump Protest as the protest gets worse. But then i was thinking about removed it not only for that reason but also the second reason. It's not well made it's just a short sentense i made due to being rushed just before my time on the PC is going to end. So yeah i had removed it for both reasons you can re added it in if you like but for me i think its best to do nothing and let you think about it. 15:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC) CrusaderToonamiUK ( talk)
Hi, you edited my addition to Black Bloc. Here is what your looking for? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/style/antifa-fashion.html. They confirm why ANTIFA dresses "Black Bloc". I believe this establish the truth and you correctness is anticipated (something you previously believed, suspected, or feared to not be the case). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casey92 ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I see you removed the Ngo incident. Do you think the same thing should be done for Willem van Spronsen? Because there was no consensus for that either as far as I am aware, so I do not know whether you forgot to remove it or if you believe it can stay. It currently says this:
In July 2019, 69-year-old Willem van Spronsen staged a predawn lone-wolf attack on the ICE's Northwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington. After hurling incendiary devices in an attempt to set fire to a commercial-size propane tank at the facility and aiming his homemade unregistered " ghost" AR-15 style rifle at first responders, he was shot dead by police. [1] The Tacoma Police Department said Van Spronsen's possible motives included his association with antifa and was reviewing his manifesto [2] in which he wrote "I am antifa". [3] Calling him a "good friend and comrade", Seattle Antifascist Action proclaimed Van Spronsen "a martyr who gave his life to the struggle against fascism". [3]
Other recent additions that may be worth verifying and discussing could be these:
In June 2020, conservative journalist Andy Ngo, whom Rolling Stone has described as a right-wing "provocateur" [1] and Vox called a "far-right sympathizer" who doxed at least one antifa activist by publishing her full name, [2] sued antifa seeking $900,000 in damages for assault and emotional distress and an injunction to prevent further harassment. The lawsuit, filed on Ngo's behalf by his attorney Harmeet Dhillon, cites Rose City Antifa, five other named defendants and additional unknown assailants. It stems from multiple alleged attacks on Ngo in Portland during 2019 and accuses Rose City Antifa in particular of a "pattern of racketeering activities". [3]
On June 5, 2020, three known members of a local antifa group were arrested for looting, burglarizing, and damaging property at a Target retail store in Austin, Texas six days earlier. [1] [2]
Let me know what you think.
Finally, what do you think of
this revert (RV, sources don't make connection to antifa or the subject of the section so basically synth/OR
) of
my edit (from Tucker Carlson (whose show has been described by the Anti-Defamation League[31] and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)[32] as well as news outlets such as Business Insider, CNN, GQ and Vox as promoting and echoing white supremacist discourse.[33][34][35][36]
)? I thought it was relevant and helpful for context. In all other cases, we describe what reliable sources say about those involved with antifa. Maybe not with those sources and this wording, but I believe it could be worth adding or mentioning somehow.
Thanks for your time.-- Davide King ( talk) 13:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
provide context for the incident(as you wrote) which I hope you can rework in the main body with those sources which relate to antifa and are not WP:SYNTH.-- Davide King ( talk) 17:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
legitimate response) and Chomsky (
a major gift to the right). I agree it is a shame to elide that discussion, so maybe a better wording could be used. That would really be useful; this article truly need more books and academic studies and research, less news sources written by non-experts, etc.
The Trump administration blamed what it called the radical left, naming antifa, a contraction of the word "anti-fascist" that has come to be associated with a diffuse movement of left-wing protesters who engage in more aggressive techniques like vandalism.So there is not even consistency in the use of far-left and in other words individuals within antifa are described as generally holding left-wing to far-left views, but the only thing certain is that antifa is anti-fascist.
Hey Arms and Hearts. Hope you're well. I'm reaching out to people who have edited [[South Wales East (Senedd Cymru electoral region)] and, in particular, people who know how to edit the table of list members. The Conservative Senedd member Mohammed Asghar has died and having tried to just enter "Vacant" underneath his name, I've got lost in a mathematical haze of rowspan=x rowspan=z rowspan=q confusion. I just can't for the life of me work out which rowspans and column spans and other numbers I have to increase by 1 to add the word "vacant" underneath his name. Could you either help or do this for me please? I had the same problems with European Parliament regions, I just get brain freeze whenever I try to work out what to do with rowspan numbers and I'm too scared to just go ahead and wish for the best!
Thanks for any assistance :) I'll post a version of this message on a few other editors pages too just in case there's someone else about. Speak soon doktorb words deeds 18:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
It appears nobody is engaging in communication in regards to why the video should be removed. Please can you engage in the talk section before you undo my revert.
Many thanks, just trying get a more balanced page here! It seems ever so one sided! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gu64rk g ( talk • contribs) 15:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Arms & Hearts,
Hope you are well. If you'll oblige my reaching out, I'm a student doing some research for a summer internship related to improving content safety online. The company I'm interning with is trying to keep the web free of misinformation. We are hoping to learn from dedicated Wikipedia editors about their motivations to spend time doing editing work online (so that we can motivate others to do the same on other platforms). I saw that you are fairly active with edits; would you be willing to chat with me about your work for about ~20 min one day? If you prefer I can give you my questions in writing, too.
Thanks for considering!
LailaAtTrustLab ( talk) 18:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Mark Duggan was lawfully killed - the information is in the article. Read it. Sweet6970 ( talk) 11:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
A quote from the RfC page: ‘Before using the RfC process to get opinions from outside editors, it's often faster and more effective to thoroughly discuss the matter with any other parties on the related talk page. Editors are normally expected to make a reasonable attempt at working out their disputes before seeking help from others. ‘ Why do you decline to discuss this matter on the Talk page? Sweet6970 ( talk) 11:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Done per request, please fix any links to the article and do any other post move cleanups. Best regards Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 21:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Watkins (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Watkins (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P-K3 ( talk) 17:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Watkins (politician), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Watkins (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Thank you for your message. The reason for calling them American is the categories "from Los Angeles" and "from Athens, Georgia". I know that such categories often include people who have gone there to live and are really from some unidentified place. I have no objection if "American" is deleted.-- Johnsoniensis ( talk) 19:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Your post at Talk:Daily Mail will go nowhere. Just as all previous well argued and factual complaints registered there have gone nowhere. Some are still visible on that very page. Lots more have been purposefully removed by Administrators for their potential to expose the truth. That truth being, the vast majority of Wikipedia editors are all in on the idea that it is Wikipedia's mission to be as biased as possible against their political enemies, the Mail being the perfect target, as the most widely read and most right wing newspaper in Britain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChinaDaniel ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, For avoidance of doubt, you might want to update your comment on Talk:Demonstrations_in_support_of_Donald_Trump#Discussion_about_a_merge_into_this_article since it looks like there is support for your proposal. Cheers, Albertaont ( talk) 20:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if you saw this, but I declined your request to block UnguidedEmperor
[1]. See the diff for the reasoning. I would also like to point out that saying "...if you're able, try to write edit summaries that make sense"
[2] towards UnguidedEmperor can be construed as uncivil. Text based communication has its limits, and the phrasing you used could easily be misinterpreted. Thanks, --
Hammersoft (
talk) 21:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
I asked Editor Alex2021 to revert his edits as he works for them but I see although he's declared on the talk page he hasn't done that. I was going to but you've edited since. Doug Weller talk 16:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me Why did you remove it!!!!! Ngyk198 ( talk) 10:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
How can the protestors be considered peaceful, when in the same opening paragraph it says "Ashburton House (the church's parish house), which had been damaged by a fire [arson] during protests the night before"? Why not just say protestors, not peaceful, not violent, just protestors. Teh 14:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I see all you do with your life is camp wikipedia articles to ensure everything has a maximally leftist slant. Your parents must be very proud. 207.32.162.22 ( talk) 17:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Nice work. Feel free to have at it in all the other UK police force articles, as I have on a lot of the fire service articles. I'll happily support your efforts to remove indiscriminate unencyclopaeidic guff. 10mmsocket ( talk) 20:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
If you fancy a bit of banality trimming - this whole section West_Yorkshire_Police#Former_Divisions. I think it needs deleting completely, or reducing to just a couple of paragraphs. The tables & map are way too detailed for former structures. -- 10mmsocket ( talk) 10:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello Arms & Hearts, thank you for your message. I think you made a mistake. I can add reliable sources to confirm informations presented. As for the list of photographie series I don’t understand how it can be identified as copyright infringment? I’m going to read the rules on how to write about living people to help me, but if it could be possible to give me acces to my text back it would be very helpfull. Clotse ( talk) 07:13, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
You "welcomed" me yesterday after I made an edit without logging in. Thanks for respecting IP editors! :) SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Organisation and structure of the Metropolitan Police - Have you seen this? It's horrendous. Fancy a bit of a cleanup / merger into the main article? 10mmsocket ( talk) 15:04, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
If you think the gallery in WMP is pointless (which I fully support) then check out List of police stations in the West Midlands. I PROD'ed it and was told not to be stupid. Definitely worthy of an AfD as utterly pointless, especially as no other such article exists for police and fire stations in the UK. 10mmsocket ( talk) 12:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You welcomed a user I already welcomed. Don't know if you meant to do this or not but I just wanted to make sure you knew ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#0001 18:09, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Please do not wholesale revert copyright violation removals like you did at George Floyd protests in Portland. Close paraphrasing (or close para) is still one, please see WP:Close paraphrasing for more information, and WP:Contributor copyright investigations/Albertaont for why I removed the content I did. I've rewritten it like you've asked, but I know very little about this topic and would ask that you ask someone who at least is familiar with the details from hereon out. Sennecaster ( Chat) 02:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
I removed an unverifiable claim. The "source", a free online news article, does not state where exactly it got this information from, how, or prove in any way that it was actually said ("encrypted social media channels"). Moreover, it is gossip. Someone's "Personal Life", should be more than antagonistic gossip. Why are these random, anonymous views so notable that they make up the final line of, essentially, her mini autobiography? I could have removed a lot more. I hope you set ideology aside before you attempt to undo it again.
In a more general view, "Personal Life" sections on less notable individuals should be a basic set of facts (birthplace etc.) or done away with entirely.
Wikipedia should be neutral. I don't expect that ever to be the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LosingBattle ( talk • contribs) 22:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
There is no suggestion in the article that she has ever left the USA. Musicians from Athens, Georgia are clearly American. Rathfelder ( talk) 19:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
how about we just remove Category:Musicians from Athens, Georgia?If you don't respond I'll probably just go ahead and do it and we can leave this there. – Arms & Hearts ( talk) 16:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
I was going to revert or tag your addition to City of London police as having undue weight. But then I see your user page that your response would be. And guess what, I get it. Thanks to you I'm now a fellow DGAFfer. Thanks for introducing me to a way to express my Wikiattitude. I don't set out to upset people, but DGAF when I do. Your contribution may have been a bit long in words, but it was well-sourced, new information to me, and interesting to read, so why should I GAF about whether it stays or goes? TBH I think it now shows perhaps the article doesn't have enough of these sort of things. And your response to this post? DILLIGAF! 10mmsocket ( talk) 17:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you're absolutely right. That redirect was completely wrong. I corrected it . Can you check ? Regards, Filiep ( talk) 16:00, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Arms & Hearts. It seems you have inadevertently put all the RfDs created before yours in a Template:Collapse. Could you fix this or ask an admin to fix this? Veverve ( talk) 15:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Yes, a FB page has usually no outside source, but 5k users are reliable and significant source. The fact that kiwi.com has disgusting business behaviors are good reasons to make this public. Peteruetz ( talk) 01:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021 United States Capitol attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 20:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NewsAndEventsGuy ( talk) 17:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
On 6 June 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Sophie Freud, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 11:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Please join the discussion at Talk:Swash regarding the brand's ownership. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 00:19, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I replied at Talk:Tina Peters. I didn't want to explain this there, but i am prevented by an editing restriction from putting an article directly into mainspace. If it were up to me I would put a very short innocuous article that would have no contoversy or BLP problems in place right now. Going through AFC, it is effectively required that an article has to be longer and more complete, and to address and deal in a balanced way with any controversy or BLP issues that i would rather avoid for now. I'm just explaining i cannot immediately respond as you might wish/expect to your pressure.
Right now I would prefer, in order:
Sincerely, Doncram ( talk) 17:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I created the category and support your proposed change, so I don't think the discussion is necessary, you have my consensus. CT55555( talk) 18:17, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Stop deleting the compilations of Against All Authority, a notable punk band from the 1990s that is still active. They are notable releases and I will file for a page lock if you don't stop deleting almost 5,000 characters off this wiki page. Whatever grief you have against the band will need to be saved for off of an information website. There are countless, literally tens of thousands, of bands with their compilation appearances on their wikipedia. I understand you are a frustrated musician but you need to leave other musicians' public information alone. 2600:1700:8140:29C0:8033:6C89:E253:CE4E ( talk) 22:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
The redirect LGBT activists has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 18 § LGBT activists until a consensus is reached. user:A smart kitten meow 10:54, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)